Sanaa – Yemeni President Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi, his prime minister and entire government cabinet resigned en masse today, just 24 hours after Houthi rebels occupied the presidential compound in Sanaa. The resignations give unprecedented power to the Houthis, a Shiite minority from the country’s isolated northern highlands.
The political crisis also opens the door to an all-out war over control of the Yemeni capital, involving Sunni political factions and al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, or AQAP. The conflict could also draw in Saudi Arabia, the United States and Iran.
The streets in Yemen’s capital are now a maze of checkpoints, a few still manned by government forces wearing military uniforms, but most these days are controlled by Houthis. Unlike government forces, the Houthis are typically dressed in tribal garb–a shawl wrapped around their face and a skirt known as a ma’awaz.
Armed with AK-47s, the Houthis are primarily looking for members of AQAP.
The Houthis, however, are quickly proving that the old adage, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend,” is not always true. While they are bitter enemies of AQAP, the Houthis manning the checkpoints often adorn their AK-47s with stickers bearing the group’s motto: “Death to America, death to Israel, curse on the Jews, victory to Islam.”
For the West, this labyrinth of Yemeni politics underscores the complexity of trying to find a reliable ally to fight Al Qaeda’s Yemen affiliate, which claimed credit for the deadly attack earlier this month against the offices of Charlie Hebdo in Paris. While the U.S. government had continued to back Hadi as a close partner in the war on terror, it’s the Houthis, also known as Ansar Allah, who have been battling AQAP on the streets of Sanaa.
AQAP launched a series of car bomb and suicide attacks against the Houthis starting in late September. At checkpoints around Sanaa, the Houthis are mostly searching for AQAP members trying to smuggle bombs and bomb-making materials into the city. It’s often a losing battle, since smuggling explosives can be as simple as placing a Houthi placard—which have the same motto as the stickers on the AK-47s–on a car dashboard to slip through checkpoints.
In a recent AQAP video, which The Intercept translated from Arabic to English, Nasser bin Ali al Ansi, a senior AQAP official, said the group was making steady progress against the Houthis and asserted that AQAP was working on “expanding the geographical area” of its attacks against the Houthis. The AQAP official said that group depends on “booty” it seizes from its enemies, because it lacks sufficient funds to effectively take on the Houthis. He also called on “Muslims to support those Jihadists” fighting the Houthis.
But the Houthis oppose American involvement in Yemen—even to fight al Qaeda—and this helps explain why the Obama administration is unlikely to embrace the new power structure anytime soon. Another reason is that they are seen as aligned with Iran.
For years, the Yemeni government attempted to inflate Iran’s influence over the Houthis in the hopes of winning U.S. permission to use counterterrorism funds and assistance to fight the Houthis. According to diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks, senior Bush administration officials consistently rebuffed such requests from the Yemeni government, saying the U.S. government saw the battle against the Houthis as a domestic issue.
The Obama administration has shied away from taking a clear stance on Iran’s support for the Houthis.
“We’ve remained troubled by the history of work between the Houthis and the Iranians,” State Department Thursday spokesperson Jen Psaki said Thursday. “Now we don’t assess that there is, or have, new cooperation on that front.”
Saudi Arabia has also portrayed the Houthis as an Iranian proxy, and the kingdom has carried out a number of airstrikes against the movement’s strongholds.
One clear source of support for the Houthis come from former President Ali Abdullah Saleh, who is from the same Shiite sect. Saleh is long suspected of playing a direct role in the Houthis’ stunning seizure of the capital. This week, several Arab TV networks aired a purported recording of a phone call between Saleh and a senior Houthi leader, with the former president advising on the group’s military and political operations.
During his time in power, Saleh often shifted his alliances; he waged six wars against the Houthis from 2004-2010, but at times used the Houthis to crush political opponents. Given that history, many doubt the new power structure, dominated by the Houthi-Saleh alliance, will last.
Saleh and the Houthis “are in love,” said Asham, a student at Sanaa University, who asked that his last name not be used because of the political situation. “But their marriage will end in divorce. They can’t live together forever because they both want the same thing–power.”
While the U.S. State Department initially resisted calling this week’s events in Yemen a coup, the power shift had already tilted to the Houthis. The rebel group’s control was cemented earlier this month, when Hadi quietly signed presidential decrees handing over the security apparatus, which has traditionally functioned as a source of government salaries for leaders’ families, friends and tribesmen.
After signing a power-sharing agreement late Wednesday, Hadi had effectively handed over power to the Houthis, who launched a coup earlier this week that culminated in a shootout between presidential guards and Houthi militia. The agreement was expected to make official the Houthis’ de facto control over the capital, and today’s mass resignation all but ensures the group’s takeover.
An AQAP spokesperson welcomed the fall of the government, telling The Intercept: “we operate better in such circumstances.”
“I believe that both Houthis and Saleh are picking their posts,” said Fernando Carvajal, a Yemen specialist and a long-time consultant to non-governmental organizations in the country. “By taking over the police now Houthis and Saleh can recruit militias.”
Shortly after taking over the security posts, the Houthi police chiefs used their new powers to arrest a close aide to Hadi. The government called the arrest a kidnapping.
Hadi’s government, in the meantime, was already in a state of retreat; Houthis this week secured control of Yemen state media.
Many see this week’s coup as the final culmination of a series of events that started to unfold in January 2014, when Hadi initiated a ceasefire to the months-long battle between Houthis and Sunni Salafists outside the city of Sa’dah, the provincial capital of the Houthi movement. Hadi’s mediation resulted in the eviction of about 15,000 Salafist students from Sa’dah Province—a victory for the Houthis.
The Houthis began their takeover of Sanaa in September and started filling newly vacant leadership positions at police headquarters. That was followed by this week’s coup, and what now appears to be a near total seizure of power.
While Sanaa has experienced a series of ground-shaking artillery shells, explosions, and semi-automatic gunfire in the past week, businesses outside the immediate fighting areas have remained open, and Yemenis have greeted this latest power play with equanimity. Hisham Al-Omeisy, an information and communications consultant in Sanaa, says that most Yemenis had simply lost faith in government rhetoric. “When speaking of current status quo nowadays in Yemen we say [it’s like] the blind trying to apply mascara to the unstable and agitated crazy.”
Photo: EPA/Landov
Funny how Al Qaeda is not widely recognized as a creation of the CIA and MOSSAD. It is also no surprising that anything ‘Shia’ is distasteful to Tel Aviv and Washington. Bibi will address Congress soon and we know that the ultimate goal is to send US mercenary troops the Iraq to fight Isis on behalf of ‘greater ‘ Israel. In light of the Charlie Hebdo black op , we may expect new legislation against anti-semitic speech and new restrictions on journalisim and cartoons.To hide the truth and suppress dissent is the. global ruling class agenda.
Journalistically,
1/ how does “they are seen as aligned with Iran” become “taking a clear stance on Iran’s support for the Houthis” ?
2/ in how far, if at all, did the predominant AQAP angle in this story (several quotes from AQAP spokespersons, none whatsoever on Houthi side) influence the reporting ?
“In a recent AQAP video, which The Intercept translated from Arabic to English, Nasser bin Ali al Ansi, a senior AQAP official, said the group was making steady progress against the Houthis and asserted that AQAP was working on “expanding the geographical area” of its attacks against the Houthis. The AQAP official said that group depends on “booty” it seizes from its enemies, because it lacks sufficient funds to effectively take on the Houthis. He also called on “Muslims to support those Jihadists” fighting the Houthis.”
“An AQAP spokesperson welcomed the fall of the government, telling The Intercept: “we operate better in such circumstances.” “
Well at least it’s only Al Qaeda and not the really ‘bad guys’ on the first string, ISIL (as Obama says).
While at first glance this certainly looks like another case of SNAFUBO (Situation Normal All ****ed Up By Obama) –- there’s really nothing to worry about.
Obama is sending in Victoria KAGAN Nuland with a full back-pack of cookies and a newly printed version of her husband’s PNEC (Project for a New Empire Century) strategy document (co-authored with Thomas Barnett) which goes beyond Barnett’s 2004 Naval War College, “The Pentagon’s New Map”, and promulgates a full-spectrum dominance “Global Empire’s New Map”, which Obama just assured Vice Emperor McCann would win back one for the gipper in short order.
Stand by for coming news on Nuland’s be-heading.
Not to worry.
John McCain will save Nuland.
Barrett Brown serves as a warning.
His ‘crime’ reminds me of Aaron Swartz:
he downloaded too many journals.
CFAA always goes after those, who didn’t know
there was anything wrong with their actions.
CFAA is a warning to the rest of us, that we hold
a very dangerous machine in our hands.
“When speaking of current status quo nowadays in Yemen we say [it’s like] the blind trying to apply mascara to the unstable and agitated crazy.”
When someone transliterates instead of translates a foreign language, we’re left with something barely understandable. That same principle applies to our foreign policy and what appears to be a schizophrenic prosecution of that policy by not understanding centuries old tribal customs and religious enmities and the many vagaries in languages. The US is continuously left looking and acting like ignorant buffoons. We took over from the defeated French in Viet Nam(lost), Took over from the defeated USSR in Afghanistan and are still there fighting the very people we supported when they were fighting the USSR. Invaded Iraq 3 times even though we supported the now executed Saddam because he was at war with Iran. Iran is our “enemy” because they held our embassy personnel hostage for over a year, simply because we supported the brutal and repressive Shah we installed after the coup instigated by Kermit Roosevelt. We keep tripping over our own feet.
Buffoonery contrived. The puppet masters of global finance, universal war profiteering and zionist zealots derive great pleasure in manipulating their vassal automatons and promoting their imperial agenda deliniated in the infamous ‘Protocols’.
coram nobis, the government of Iran likes the Assad regime, doesn’t it?
Well, at least better than NATO taking over the world, I think.
As for the situation in Yemen, AQAP vs. the Houthis vs. US-Puppets,
—who does the US have for a puppet? Saleh was blacklisted just this past year.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/10/us-sanctions-yemen-saleh-houthi-rebel-leaders
Maybe, the US-Puppet was the outgoing leader, Hadi?
I recall years of demos, demanding that Saleh should be ousted.
But, Saleh is Shi’ite, opposed by AQAP, who are Sunni.
I do know that US supported Saleh, and let him tell lies for the US.
It so difficult to pick the side to root for, when there are so many sects.
I will pick whomever the US would least like to see take over Yemen.
Whoever that is…
What is the US going to do now?
Drone them? Oh, no that’s been done already.
Invade them? Nope, that’s been done too.
Bomb them? Been there, done that.
Choose their “president”? Already done.
Give safe harbor to their sanguine dictator? Nope. That trick was done too.
What then? Leave them alone, perhaps? Naaaw, much too much can be profited from that situation to just quit while they’re ahead.
Off-topic here, but relevant to a number of previous TI articles. “Barrett Brown sentenced to 63 months for ‘merely linking to hacked material'”.
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jan/22/barrett-brown-trial-warns-dangerous-precedent-hacking-sentencing
Federal court, which means Obama DOJ prosecution.
Coram, any idea how much of the sentence was for the threats to the FBI agent and his family, and how much was for the linking?
He previously pleaded guilty to:
(1) transmitting a threat in interstate commerce
(2) accessory after the fact in the unauthorized access to a protected computer and
(3) interference with the execution of a search warrant and aid and abet.
http://www.techworm.net/2014/12/anonymous-linked-journalist-barrett-brown-sentenced-january-15th.html
I’m still trying to get more details because the details of what they charged, and what he pleaded to, are apparently secret.
TI had a story in December on this —
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/12/17/barrett-brown-sentenced
The allegation about a threat to an FBI agent was something about a YouTube video that prosecution didn’t present in court.
TI ran a story in December on the case. The FBI allegation was something about a YouTube video that prosecution didn’t present in court, near as I can tell.
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/12/17/barrett-brown-sentenced
TI has new story up, as of an hour ago.
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/01/22/barrett-brown-sentenced-five-years-vows-keep-investigating-government-wrongdoing/
Thanks coram – just got to that. On another note: Perhaps the most on-point “movie” review of “American Sniper” penned by Matt Taibbi – compare and contrast this with the “real” Rolling Stone’s movie reviewer when done with his…
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/american-sniper-is-almost-too-dumb-to-criticize-20150121?page=2
coram – What Mona mentioned. I’ve been looking for a break-down of the sentencing as well. Thank you…
He also has to pay Stratfor ~$890K.
To all who are discussing this:
Read the following from Quinn Norton, and follow her on twitter to catch several conversations on this subject:
Quinn Norton – We Should All Step Back From Security Journalism … I’ll go first
A little early for things off-topic, but these facts are of interest to many here, especially in light of Obama lately laughably pretending to NOT be a corrupt corporatist/militarist war-criminal who serves the 0.1%:
*Key Democrat Offers Obama Hope On Fast Track Authority For Secretive Trade Deals*
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/22/fast-track_n_6527202.html#comments
By the way, Obama drone struck 7 people to death in Pakistan the other day. Plus there are now thousands of US troops in Iraq, and over 10,000 still in Afghanistan, and of course US airstrikes are still killing people all the time. So much for ‘ending wars.’ Oh, and:
*Pentagon Confirms US Troops Will Deploy to Ukraine in Spring* (link in reply)
Ukraine article:
http://news.antiwar.com/2015/01/21/pentagon-confirms-us-troops-will-deploy-to-ukraine-in-spring/
Also see *The Golden Age of Black Ops – Special Ops Missions Already in 105 Countries in 2015* (By Nick Turse)
Obama’s dirty wars continue…
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175945/tomgram%3A_nick_turse%2C_a_shadow_war_in_150_countries/
Meanwhile, back in Donetsk —
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/22/donetsk-trolleybus-explosion-peace-negotiations-russia-ukraine
Democrats are progressives who pass the laws that positively excite the Climate Change and Equality and gun control and immigration reform-obsessed Salon.com and the Guardian. and NYT. If you’re embarrassed by that, think about a different line of political thought.
In terms of the establishment, both Democrats and Republicans are hopeless, useless, corrupt and (not incidentally) obscenely wealthy compared to their many constituents.
In terms of voters, both Democrats and Republicans are tribalist and uneducated twits.
It isn’t my progressive or (lesser) libertarian affinities that embarrasses me. American politics – controlled as it is by the establishment and a complicit media – certainly does embarrass me, for there is no room therein for the dissolution of corporatism and militarism which have corrupted the State, and this means things will get worse and not better.
I understand that you think all things calling themselves ‘left wing’ or even sniffing of government involvement should be called progressive and damned to hell, but I don’t agree, any more than I agree that Dick Cheney and Ron Paul are from the same place.
There is much pretense in all of this theater, and I’m not for one side or the other, really. I’m for honesty, decency and moreover a government that fears the people – instead of the people fearing the government (“When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.” Thomas Jefferson*)
*For those just joining the discussion, Thomas Jefferson may have boinked his slave Sally inappropriately)
I was going to say (putting me – confusingly to all tribalists – in league with ‘those darn libertarians’) that “America should just mind its own business,” but then I remembered that corporate and military lunatics, instead of good sense, decide for us all what *is* America’s business.
America should feel free to meddle in foreign countries, if these criteria are met:
1. at least 50% of Americans can find the country on a map
2. at least 50% of Americans can spell the country’s name
3. at least 50% of Americans are, or have family members who are, serving in the US military, and
4. at least 50% of Americans are willing to buy War Bonds that will cover the full cost of the war
Trouble is, they’re probably not that well-informed. According to an unscientific poll by Jimmy Kimmel, 50% (7 of 14) of the American public think that Dr. Martin Luther King gave a speech last Monday to commemorate Martin Luther King Day. Great speech.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2919022/Californians-caught-Jimmy-Kimmel-prank-think-Martin-Luther-King-ALIVE-gave-speech-MLK-day.html
I find it particularly sad that people don’t who MLK Jr. was. As I’m sure you know, his exhortations to the US to ‘get a grip’ still ring brightly true.
“A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom.”
– Martin Luther King Jr.
We are only told (if anything) by the mainstream about his support of black rights, and even that is often reduced to watered-down saccharine platitudes that don’t even begin to address the horrors he met with astonishing dignity. His moral assertiveness was not limited to just black rights, of course, and certainly no one at all in America should be stupidly ignorant of his bold, beautiful and, above all, peaceful vision for all of America.
“According to an unscientific poll by Jimmy Kimmel, 50% (7 of 14) of the American public think that Dr. Martin Luther King gave a speech last Monday to commemorate Martin Luther King Day. Great speech.”
So far they don’t believe that Obama is the reincarnation of MLK Jr,it is ok.
Cindy –
Excellent quote there from Dr. King. His movement was in MY lifetime, and I’m still finding out how complex this towering leader was. He really sought to bring all people together who felt the need to work for justice, rights for all, economic opportunity and peace, too. The fact that he was so human shouldn’t detract, from his legacy, but should make him approachable. We don’t need a marble statue! And we should make sure that the generations born after him know the truth of the struggle and his legacy.
Mark Dice has them affirming MLK was the first African American to walk on the moon:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-znXUMp0qk
The funeral is next week:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-6RlheSQkM
You mean vis-à-vis the adventurous and transgressive and personal- and national-boundary oblivious, and busybody, progressive left–backed by its well revenue-funded armies of hyper-state enforcement muscle?
“You mean vis-à-vis the adventurous and transgressive and personal- and national-boundary oblivious, and busybody, progressive left–backed by its well revenue-funded armies of hyper-state enforcement muscle?”
Well, no, not exactly. I just find the classic liberal approach to non-interventionism far superior to corporatist militarism and imperialism.
Where is well-nourished Big Government placed in your idea of classical liberalism?
I would like to see single payer health care, clean water and air, engaging education – those sort of things government should facilitate.
Other than that, not too much. Obviously, dismantling the bloated military fixation will free up finances for more worthy projects. Removing big industry from gobbling freely at the trough of fiat currency, and (relatedly) dissolving the Federal Reserve’s sphere of domination are also certainly significant goals.
The American organization whereby corporatism/militarism ostensibly cannot corrupt the system is largely yet to be created, but I think the best minds in the truly progressive and real libertarian camps could do far better (working honestly with the Constitution and Bill of Rights) than the current unconstitutional jokers who only entrench corruption ever deeper.
Um, Cindy, big industry is all over health care. Pharmacopoeia alone is very big business–and Big Government is only too happy to accede to the market-driven, and state job-driven, hysterics and phobias of the progressive left.
The ambulance industry alone is larger by revenue than the entire U.S. movie industry.
And your reply doesn’t square with the definition of classical liberalism, if you’ll accept it (e.g., Sillyputty has a problem with “pigeon-holing”):
“Classical liberalism is a philosophy committed to the ideal of limited government and liberty of individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free markets.”
https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Classical_liberalism.html
“…your reply doesn’t square with the definition of classical liberalism.”
Well, no, it wouldn’t. I told you I’m mostly progressive, and I mentioned non-interventionism as a libertarian value I agree with, as do many progressives.
Single payer health care is not corporatist, but it is government-centric without being beholden to corporations who hold entrenched control over policy and drug costs. I did not say it was classical liberal.
You seem determined to read in my posts things that simply are not there.
Oh, I see the problem. You thought I answered your question, “Where is well-nourished Big Government placed in your idea of classical liberalism?”
I ignored that, quite deliberately, and told you what I thought some of the functions the function of government were, regardless of its relative size.
Perhaps I should have told you I ignored your question, but I didn’t think you expected a serious response to it, for I surmised you knew the question was plainly goofy, as it makes no internal sense (“Big Government in classical liberalism – ha!”), and I knew that.
Now you do; this is your first formal declaration of that using the word. But I had a suspicion.
And who do you think sells to Big Governments flush with dollars siphoned from taxpayers by progressives? Dollars which somehow always end up, crony like, in the pockets of pushers and marketers of new and improved and invented and patented product? Amplified by Big Governments beholden to special interests with vested interest in pitching their favorite pet malaises to their representation?
With no checks now, no costs controls, thanks to it being the People’s Single Payer cost center.
You just tried to answer affirmatively to it immediately above (maybe without knowing what classical liberalism meant). Plain as day for everyone to read for themselves.
Uh huh.
Just pathetic, Cindy.
Bonneville- Single payer works very well in some countries. It could here, but it wouldn’t please you, I realize.
This is not my” first formal declaration” of the word progressive, as you say, either. At 9.22 just this very evening (above in the scroll), in a response TO YOU no less, I said “It isn’t my progressive or (lesser) libertarian affinities that embarrasses me…”
The thing is, you just don’t read carefully or pay close enough attention to what is actually said.
Yes, Bonneville, you are pathetic.
Thanks for admitting it.
“Progressive” Comment is at 9.43. My bad.
Well, we’re really bridging the gap here, ain’t we?
The have oppressive non-health care sector unemployment problems. Have for decades, because of it.
Bonneville let me ask, if not single payer, what exactly do you propose? It’s easy to criticized the ideas of others when you don’t care to share yours, that is if you have any on the subject.
And…the Saudi Arabian king has just become deceased. Power struggle there too? Oh me, oh my. Whatever will the Obama administration do with all this chaos not instigated by them?
They’re still working through the sons of Abdul-Aziz ibn Saud (d. 1953), according to The Economist’s chart.
http://www.economist.com/node/16588422
Can’t tell the players without a scorecard.
Royal dude was 90 years old. He had to die sometime. I guess people in the ME don’t live quite as long as they used to in Biblical times.
I’m sure it won’t be very long before some ISIS faction declares itself in Yemen, or maybe some AQAP get convinced to defect for that whole enemy of my enemy thing because, you know, ISIS is at least Sunni.
Then Americans can be really afraid again and the Beltway’s War Party will immediately pass the president’s requested ISIS force authorization – which ought to marry itself quite well to the existing AUMF against “terrorism.” That, of course, will allow the MIC to not only continue using drones there and anywhere ISIS flags appear, but also at leisure decide when uncounted American boots might find Yemen (or any ISIS declared territory) occupation worthy. Not to mention, the GOP is backing Israel’s desire for war with Iran and the Houthis’ coup supported by Tehran could be as good of an excuse as any.
I’m sure there’s several MIC, IC or other covert agencies in that area can follow the FBI’s fine example, find some dumb enough poor Sunni kid in Yemen, and offer him $250,000 to make a loyalty declaration video and fly an ISIS flag for a few days…
The ISIS story is already out: http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/21/politics/isis-gaining-ground-in-yemen/ . But there’s so much I don’t know about this. How long will ISIS and al-Qaida even be on the outs? Right now al-Qaida says it owes its “bayat” to that one-eyed Taliban guy Muhammad Omar that the U.S. has been pretending to hunt since 2001. If he ever dies of old age or something, will they go along with the requests to switch loyalty? Also … the Houthis apparently control an area on the west coast which on the map I looked at is listed as Sunni majority. So are they succeeding at appealing to people across the religious divide, for more secular reasons perhaps?
Say, that story is good news for more war. Your reply though ignored the comment’s point that there’ll be reason for more U.S. involvement there even if has to be manufactured. Oh btw, you can shake a stick at all the shit the U.S. has been pretending since 2001.
“A sect (sometimes disapproving) = a small group of people who belong to a particular religion but who have some beliefs or practices which separate them from the rest of the group.”
Why do they all have so many weapons? Sorry, silly question. Do the Yemenis pay taxes? No? It will come, poor country! Sorry, silly silly silly.
“Why do they all have so many weapons?”
You ought to know, after all, it was your generosity that made it possible (provided you are USan that is).
This is one of the best articles I’ve read yet on TI. Very informative.
I am curious to know how this affects the U.S. drone program in Yemen. Before, the Administration coordinated with Saleh and then with Hadi. Maybe in the short term the Houthis won’t agree but I think the U.S. will convince them that it is worth their while ($).
It’s possible, but the administration’s distaste for anybody getting Iranian support suggests that it may be difficult for the Houthis to elicit US support. Problem is, the administration tends to form its likes and dislikes, in part, on what the Iranians like and then go the other way. It’s as confusing as in Syria, where many of the Shiite rebels are supported by Iran or its proxies, who we don’t like, who are fighting the Assad regime, whom we don’t like, who both are fighting ISIS, whom we don’t like, it seems. At least, Washington should base its likes/dislikes on realpolitik and not who Iran or Israel supports.
Speaking of the latter, it seems Mossad is bucking Bibi and telling Congress to cool it about Iran sanctions.
http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2015/01/22/the-mossad-sides-with-obama-against-aipac-and-netanyahu/
It gets confusing in DC as well, with Bibi and the Speaker on one side (the Orange One has invited Bibi to speak to Congress) and the Mossad and maybe the OWH on another. The blind are leading the blind to find the mascara all over, it seems.
These are not the best of times for Bibi it appears. Snubbed by Hollande; left waiting nervously in the streets of France for transport to the ‘Je Suis…’ march; elbowing and jostling his way through in Paris; POTUS saying he has no intention of meeting with him when he comes here to address Congress and now, outplayed by the Mossad. All in one freakin’ month…
Great observations coram and “The Orange One” – love it, gave me a good laugh.
I’m admittedly not very familiar with the nuts and bolts of what’s happening in Yemen, yet, but I think that In light of the Paris attacks, the USG will prioritize the short term threat of AQAP (I say “short term” loosely) instead of worrying about the long-term implications of further Iranian influence in the region, and therefore attempt to ally with the Houthis to continue drone operations. I think the Houthis will take all the help they can get to keep AQAP suicide bombers out of Sanaa.
I don’t get the impression that the USG is recoiling at these events and if they were, I’d at least expect more vocal response. They’ve been strangely quite. Not a single mention of “Yemen” in the State of the Union (which was undoubtedly also due to embarrassment over the sudden downfall of an established ally). I think they are monitoring the situation with the intention of working with the Houthis. The fact that the Houthis haven’t violently purged the former U.S. allied Yemen government is at least promising.
As for the long-term implications, I have no guess of what that entails.
Considering this: “The US Government is unlikely to support them.”
And this: “But the Houthis oppose American involvement in Yemen—even to fight al Qaeda—”
And the fact that drone bombing isn’t particularly useful at staving off suicide bombers or car bombs, why do you conclude that the Houthis will “take all the help they help they can get” — including from the US Government?
The situation in Yemen sounds like a good opportunity to sell arms to both sides, financed by the US taxpayer. AQAP has had some bad PR which might make supporting them directly a bit tricky. But it should be possible to provide the arms to Saudi Arabia, who in turn can provide them to AQAP.
Duce, it’s truer than ever that the enemy of my enemy is my fiend.
It appears that its time to appoint John McCain as the Yemen Ambassador; they need some “straight talk”.
As Usual,
EA
Amongst the briars and the brambles of your tangled heart, plant naught but the rose of love …
“Saleh often shifted his alliances; he waged six wars against the Houthis from 2004-2010, but at times used the Houthis to crush political opponents.”
Saleh seems to be an abusive deceitful “lover”, are Houthis so desperate or can’t find anyone better?
*never knew Scahill for a poet, but I was struck by the lyrical cadence of this article. .. Alas, it appears most Yemenis have ‘simply lost faith in government rhetoric.’ “When speaking of current status quo nowadays in Yemen we say [it’s like] the blind trying to apply mascara to the unstable and agitated crazy.”
If you read Jeremy’s writing/interviews on the matter, you’ll see how very cunning Saleh is. For as long as there are personal gains for him in it, he jumps into bed with both god and the devil at the same time. According to Jeremy, it was he (Saleh) who invited the US to start the mess in Yemen in exchange for the usual (money& guns…no lawyers though). The Wikileaks revealed that he stroke a deal with the US to cover the dronings by saying it was his military’s doings. Quite the filthy dog he is (with apologies to noble canines everywhere). Although he went after the Houthis, he now seems to be behind them. Quite telling is the story of how he came to power in the first place: by handing a suitcase to the then president of Yemen with a bomb in it. It’s really a shame that they weren’t able to totally whack him during the Arab Spring. It’s a double shame they don’t whack him now, something that should be exponentially easier.
Ssudi King just pronounced dead. Need to “groom” our new man first…
No need. Saudi Arabia always has a new reform minded octogenarian ready to step into the breach at a moment’s notice.
I’d ask why the U.S. government can’t just hand over the weapons free to the worst terrorists straight away and cut out the middleman, but I suppose the middlemen are our top priority…
It is about time the US citizen gets paid for these wars. There should be enough profit by now to go around. The arms manufacturers, dealers, shippers, and middlemen are all making a “killing”, why not everyone? If we can inflate the war big enough there might be enough for even the enemy to get rich.