IN THE VIDEO, Sami Osmakac is tall and gaunt, with jutting cheekbones and a scraggly beard. He sits cross-legged on the maroon carpet of the hotel room, wearing white cotton socks and pants that rise up his legs to reveal his thin, pale ankles. An AK-47 leans against the closet door behind him. What appears to be a suicide vest is strapped to his body. In his right hand is a pistol.
“Recording,” says an unseen man behind the camera.
“This video is to all the Muslim youth and to all the Muslims worldwide,” Osmakac says, looking straight into the lens. “This is a call to the truth. It is the call to help and aid in the party of Allah … and pay him back for every sister that has been raped and every brother that has been tortured and raped.”
The recording goes on for about eight minutes. Osmakac says he’ll avenge the deaths of Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and elsewhere. He refers to Americans as kuffar, an Arabic term for nonbelievers. “Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth,” he says. “Woman for a woman, child for a child.”
Osmakac was 25 years old on January 7, 2012, when he filmed what the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice would later call a “martyrdom video.” He was also broke and struggling with mental illness.
After recording this video in a rundown Days Inn in Tampa, Florida, Osmakac prepared to deliver what he thought was a car bomb to a popular Irish bar. According to the government, Osmakac was a dangerous, lone-wolf terrorist who would have bombed the Tampa bar, then headed to a local casino where he would have taken hostages, before finally detonating his suicide vest once police arrived.
But if Osmakac was a terrorist, he was only one in his troubled mind and in the minds of ambitious federal agents. The government could not provide any evidence that he had connections to international terrorists. He didn’t have his own weapons. He didn’t even have enough money to replace the dead battery in his beat-up, green 1994 Honda Accord.
Osmakac was the target of an elaborately orchestrated FBI sting that involved a paid informant, as well as FBI agents and support staff working on the setup for more than three months. The FBI provided all of the weapons seen in Osmakac’s martyrdom video. The bureau also gave Osmakac the car bomb he allegedly planned to detonate, and even money for a taxi so he could get to where the FBI needed him to go. Osmakac was a deeply disturbed young man, according to several of the psychiatrists and psychologists who examined him before trial. He became a “terrorist” only after the FBI provided the means, opportunity and final prodding necessary to make him one.
Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the FBI has arrested dozens of young men like Osmakac in controversial counterterrorism stings. One recent case involved a rudderless 20-year-old in Cincinnati, Ohio, named Christopher Cornell, who conspired with an FBI informant — seeking “favorable treatment” for his own “criminal exposure” — in a harebrained plot to build pipe bombs and attack Capitol Hill. And just last month, on February 25, the FBI arrested and charged two Brooklyn men for plotting, with the aid of a paid informant, to travel to Syria and join the Islamic State. The likelihood that the men would have stepped foot in Syria of their own accord seems low; only after they met the informant, who helped with travel applications and other hurdles, did their planning take shape.
Informant-led sting operations are central to the FBI’s counterterrorism program. Of 508 defendants prosecuted in federal terrorism-related cases in the decade after 9/11, 243 were involved with an FBI informant, while 158 were the targets of sting operations. Of those cases, an informant or FBI undercover operative led 49 defendants in their terrorism plots, similar to the way Osmakac was led in his.
In these cases, the FBI says paid informants and undercover agents are foiling attacks before they occur. But the evidence suggests — and a recent Human Rights Watch report on the subject illustrates — that the FBI isn’t always nabbing would-be terrorists so much as setting up mentally ill or economically desperate people to commit crimes they could never have accomplished on their own.
At least in Osmakac’s case, FBI agents seem to agree with that criticism, though they never intended for that admission to become public. In the Osmakac sting, the undercover FBI agent went by the pseudonym “Amir Jones.” He’s the guy behind the camera in Osmakac’s martyrdom video. Amir, posing as a dealer who could provide weapons, wore a hidden recording device throughout the sting.
The device picked up conversations, including, apparently, back at the FBI’s Tampa Field Office, a gated compound beneath the flight path of Tampa International Airport, among agents and employees who assumed their words were private and protected. These unintentional recordings offer an exclusive look inside an FBI counterterrorism sting, and suggest that, even in the eyes of the FBI agents involved, these sting targets aren’t always the threatening figures they are made out to be.
Film by Jeff Stimmel (no audio)
ON JANUARY 7, 2012, after the martyrdom video was recorded, Amir and others poked fun at Osmakac and the little movie the FBI had helped him produce.
“When he was putting stuff on, he acted like he was nervous,” one of the speakers tells Amir. “He kept backing away …”
“Yeah,” Amir agrees.
“He looked nervous on the camera,” someone else adds.
“Yeah, he got excited. I think he got excited when he saw the stuff,” Amir says, referring to the weapons that were laid out on the hotel bed.
“Oh, yeah, you could tell,” yet another person chimes in. “He was all like, like a, like a six-year-old in a toy store.”
In other recorded conservations, Richard Worms, the FBI squad supervisor, describes Osmakac as a “retarded fool” who doesn’t have “a pot to piss in.” The agents talk about the prosecutors’ eagerness for a “Hollywood ending” for their sting. They refer to Osmakac’s targets as “wishy-washy,” and his terrorist ambitions as a “pipe-dream scenario.” The transcripts show FBI agents struggled to put $500 in Osmakac’s hands so he could make a down payment on the weapons — something the Justice Department insisted on to demonstrate Osmakac’s capacity for and commitment to terrorism.
“The money represents he’s willing to do it, because if we can’t show him killing, we can show him giving money,” FBI Special Agent Taylor Reed explains in one conversation.
These transcripts were never supposed to be revealed in their entirety. The government argued that their release could harm the U.S. government by revealing “law enforcement investigative strategy and methods.” U.S. Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli not only sealed the transcripts, but also placed them under a protective order.
The files, provided by a confidential source to The Intercept in partnership with the Investigative Fund, provide a rare behind-the-scenes account of an FBI counterterrorism sting, revealing how federal agents leveraged their relationship with a paid informant and plotted for months to turn the hapless Sami Osmakac into a terrorist. Neither the FBI Tampa Field Office nor FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C. responded to requests from The Intercept for comment on the Osmakac case or the remarks made by FBI agents and employees about the sting.
SAMI OSMAKAC WAS 13 years old when he came to the United States with his family. Fleeing violence in Kosovo in 1992, they had first traveled to Germany, where they stayed until 2000, when they were granted entrance to the U.S. He was the youngest of eight children, and he and his older brother Avni struggled at first to adapt to a new land, a new language and a new culture.
“We came to Tampa, and at first we lived in this really bad neighborhood,” Avni recalls, wearing blue jeans, spotless white Nikes and a white New York Yankees Starter cap. “It was tough, but as we learned the language, things got easier. We adapted.”
The Osmakac family opened a popular bakery in St. Petersburg, across the bay from Tampa. They were Muslim, but they rarely attended the mosque. They didn’t usually fast during Ramadan, and Sami’s sisters did not cover their hair. Growing up, Sami wasn’t particularly drawn to Islam either, according to his family. He suffered the concerns many young men in the United States do, like getting a job and saving up for a car.
In July 2009, one of Sami’s older brothers had returned to Kosovo to get married, and just before Sami was to fly to the Balkans with his brother Avni for the wedding, he had a terrible dream. “An angel grabbed me by the face and pushed me into the hellfire,” he would later tell a psychologist. At the wedding, Avni took a photograph of Sami; he’s clean-shaven and wearing a pressed white suit. He looks happy. On the flight back from the wedding, during the final leg of the journey to Tampa, the plane Sami and his brother were on hit turbulence, losing altitude quickly. “I thought we were going to crash,” Avni remembers. Sami looked horrified.
That’s when something changed in him, according to his family and mental health experts hired by both the government and the defense. Osmakac began to isolate himself from his siblings and attend the mosque frequently. He spoke of dreams about killing himself, and chastised family members for being more concerned about this life than what comes after.
In December 2009, Osmakac met a red-bearded Muslim named Russell Dennison at a local mosque. Dennison, who was American-born, was described by Osmakac as a “revert.” Muslims believe that all people are born with an understanding of the unity of Allah, so when a non-Muslim embraces Islam, some Muslims refer to this as reversion rather than conversion. Dennison went by the chosen name Abdullah; he says in a YouTube video that after being introduced to Islam, his faith grew stronger during a prison term in Pennsylvania. Osmakac’s dress changed after he met Dennison. Whereas he had once saved his money to buy nice shoes and Starter caps, he suddenly began to dress like Dennison, according to family members — cutting his pants high at the ankle, buying cheap plastic sandals and sometimes wearing a keffiyeh on his head. He refused to cut his beard, which he struggled to grow with any thickness, and he wouldn’t wear deodorant that contained alcohol.
It wasn’t just his physical appearance that was changing; by the beginning of 2010, his family also believed he was deteriorating mentally. He’d become paranoid and delusional. His skin was pale. He was sleeping on the floor of his bedroom and complained about nightmares in which he burned in hell. He stopped working at the family bakery because they served pork products. Near the end of the year, his family repeatedly asked him to see a doctor. He rebuffed them, saying that the doctors would want to kill him. (Osmakac later told a psychiatrist he in fact “was scared to go to a mental home.”)
Meanwhile, Osmakac’s friendship intensified with the red-bearded revert. Dennison, whose videos on YouTube are posted under the username “Chekdamize7,” frequently preached about Islam and ranted about the corruption of nonbelievers. Osmakac’s family believed that Dennison encouraged his extreme views, often recruiting him to make videos. Among their efforts was a two-part series in which they argued combatively about religion with Christians they confronted on the sidewalk.
Over the next year, Osmakac, who was without steady employment, established a reputation as a firebrand in the local Muslim community. He was kicked out of two mosques, and lashed out at local Muslim leaders in a YouTube video, calling them kuffar and infidels. In March 2011, Osmakac made his way to Turkey, in the hopes of traveling by land to Saudi Arabia, according to his brother. He’d been told that holy water from Mecca was a cure-all, Avni says — that if he drank it, the nightmares would cease. But Osmakac never got much farther than Istanbul, after encountering multiple transportation mishaps, and getting turned away at the Syrian border by officials who refused to let him cross without a visa. He quickly ran out of money, lost his will and called home for help. His family in Tampa helped purchase a plane ticket for him to return to Florida.
Osmakac would later tell several mental health professionals that he was in fact more interested in traveling to Afghanistan or Iraq to fight American troops, and perhaps even find a bride there. “If I got to Afghanistan or Iraq, someone would marry me to their daughter,” he mentioned to one psychologist. Osmakac got back in touch with Dennison in Florida, and would talk often of returning to a Muslim land so he could marry.
ON APRIL 16, 2011, Osmakac was outside of a Lady Gaga concert in Tampa. Larry Keffer, a Christian street preacher with short-cropped brown hair and a thick, white beard, was outside the concert as well. Keffer was wearing a fishing hat, a green camouflage shirt and blue pants.
“Sin is a slippery slope,” Keffer yelled through a megaphone to the Lady Gaga fans as someone else recorded the demonstration.
Most of the crowd ignored Keffer. A few concertgoers taunted him. He taunted them back. A police officer directing traffic refused to acknowledge the demonstration, while Keffer ranted about Lady Gaga and the devil. Osmakac finally confronted Keffer, pointing his finger in the preacher’s face.
“You infidel, I know the Bible better than you,” Osmakac told the preacher.
“What’s your message?” Keffer replied, talking into the megaphone.
“My message is, if y’all don’t accept Islam, y’all going to hell,” Osmakac said.
The men continued to provoke each other as people milled into the concert venue.
“Go have yourself a bacon sandwich,” Keffer told Osmakac.
“You infidel,” Osmakac said. “You infidel.”
As the argument escalated, Osmakac charged one of Keffer’s fellow demonstrators and head-butted him, bloodying the man’s mouth and breaking a dental cap. He then charged Keffer. Each wrapped his arms around the other, turning and twisting, until they broke free. The police officer managing traffic charged Osmakac with battery, giving him notice to appear in court. Osmakac was later arrested after failing to show up, Avni says, and his family had to bail him out; in just a few months’ time, Osmakac’s red-bearded friend would lead him straight into an FBI trap.
SAMI OSMAKAC AND Russell Dennison lived in Pinellas County, across the bay from Tampa. In September 2011, Dennison told Osmakac he knew a guy who ran a Middle Eastern market in Tampa. They should go see him, Dennison suggested. To this day, Osmakac doesn’t know why Dennison suggested this, or why he agreed to accompany him on the 45-minute drive to the store, called Java Village, near the Busch Gardens theme park.
When they arrived, Dennison introduced Osmakac to the owner, Abdul Raouf Dabus, a Palestinian. Dabus had flyers in his store promoting democracy, and he and Osmakac argued about the subject, with Osmakac contending that democracy and Islam were incompatible.
“Democracy makes the forbidden legal and the legal forbidden, and that’s greater infidelity,” Osmakac would tell Dabus. “Whoever enforces it is an infidel, is a Satan. Hamas is Satan. Muslim Brotherhood is Satan … If you don’t accept that God is the only legislator, then you become a polytheist, and that’s why I’m telling you.”
Osmakac didn’t know that Dabus would become an FBI informant. His work for the government has until now been secret.
According to the government’s version of events, Osmakac asked Dabus if he had Al Qaeda flags, or black banners. Osmakac disputes this, saying he never asked anyone for Al Qaeda flags.
Whatever the truth, the sting had just begun.
A psychologist appointed by the court later diagnosed Osmakac with schizoaffective disorder.
“He asked me if he can work a couple of hours, working and other stuff,” Dabus said in a phone interview from Gaza, where he now lives. “But it wasn’t really like a job. So basically, he was helping whenever he comes. And he got paid.” Dabus acknowledged he was paying Osmakac as the FBI was paying him.
In Tampa’s Muslim community, Dabus is well known. A former University of Mississippi math professor, Dabus was an associate of Sami Al-Arian, the University of South Florida professor who was indicted for allegedly providing material support to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, in a case prosecutors argued proved successful intelligence-gathering under the Patriot Act. Dabus had worked at the Islamic Academy of Florida, an elementary and secondary private school for Muslims that Al-Arian had helped to found in Temple Terrace, a suburb of Tampa.
Dabus was among the witnesses in the Al-Arian trial, and his testimony was damaging to the government’s case. He testified that he had known Al-Arian only to raise money for charitable purposes, not for violence. During cross-examination, Dabus told the defense that he feared that Al-Arian’s trial meant Palestinians in the United States could no longer speak openly about the occupied territories. “There is no longer any security for the dog that barks in this country,” Dabus said.
He also questioned whether Al-Arian’s indictment suggested Muslims had become a new target for the U.S. government. “Our kids, will they have a future here?” he asked. “I don’t know.”
While Al-Arian would continue to battle federal prosecutors, living under house arrest in Virginia until finally agreeing to deportation to Turkey this year, Dabus remained in Tampa, active in the local religious and business community. But he acquired a reputation during this time for running up debts. From 2005 to 2012, he faced foreclosure actions on his home and businesses, as well as breach-of-contract and small-claims cases. In fact, when Dabus met Osmakac, he was in rough financial straits, records show. In July 2011, the bank holding the mortgage on his business’s building was granted approval to sell the property through foreclosure; Dabus owed $779,447.
It’s unclear why Dabus became an FBI informant, or for how long he worked with the government. He says he was doing his civic duty in reporting Osmakac and the young man’s interest in acquiring weapons, and had not previously worked with the FBI, though an FBI affidavit in the Osmakac case described Dabus as having “provided reliable information in the past.” Money is a common motivator for FBI counterterrorism informants, who can earn $100,000 or more on a single case. Dabus estimates the FBI paid him $20,000 for his role in the Osmakac sting, though insists money did not motivate him.
On November 30, 2011, after Osmakac had begun working for Dabus, the two drove around the Tampa area together as Dabus secretly recorded their conversation for the FBI. Osmakac asked if Dabus could help him obtain guns and an explosive belt. However, transcripts suggest he was also having trouble separating reality from fantasy. “In the dream, I was shown that everywhere you go, everything you do, hush your mouth,” Osmakac says. “Don’t say nothing. So, yes, the dream is real. Allah showed me that dream for a reason. And he’s also protected me for a reason.”
A psychologist appointed by the court later diagnosed Osmakac with schizoaffective disorder.
ABOUT THREE WEEKS after this conversation, on instructions from the FBI, Dabus introduced Osmakac to “Amir Jones,” an undercover agent. He might be able to help Osmakac obtain weapons, Dabus told him.
“What are you looking for, so that I know if it’s something I can get you or not?” Amir asks Osmakac.
“I’m looking for, even if … one AK, at least,” Osmakac says.
“OK.”
“And maybe a couple of Uzi, ’cause they’re better to hide.”
“OK. OK.”
“If you can get the long extension like for the AK and the Uzi, the long magazines—”
“They’re called banana magazine,” Amir says. “OK.”
“And … couple of grenades, 10 grenades minimum, if you can,” Osmakac says.
“Now, and that’s it?” Amir asks.
“And a [explosive] belt.”
For all Osmakac’s talk, the FBI’s undercover videos suggest he was less a hardened terrorist and more a comic book villain. While driving around Tampa with Amir, a hidden FBI camera near the dashboard, Osmakac described a plot to bomb simultaneously the several large bridges that span Tampa Bay.
“That’s five bridges, man,” Osmakac says. “All you need is five more people …. This would crush everything, man. They would have no more food coming in. Nobody would have work. These people would commit suicide!”
Amir Jones, behind the wheel of the car, offered a hearty laugh.
BACK AMONG FEDERAL law enforcement agents, according to the secret transcripts of their private conversations, there were plenty of reasons to joke at Osmakac’s expense. FBI employees talked about how Osmakac didn’t have any money, how he thought the U.S. spy satellites were watching him, and how he had no concept of what weapons cost on the black market.
The source of their amusement was also their primary source of concern. Osmakac was, in the FBI’s own words, “a retarded fool” who didn’t have any capacity to plan and execute an attack on his own. That was a challenge for the FBI.
“Once [the source] gives it to him, it’s his money, whether we orchestrated it or not.”
– Special Agent Taylor Reed
“Part of the problem is they want to catch him in the act,” FBI Special Agent Steve Dixon says, referring to federal prosecutors. “The attorneys do and stuff, but the problem is you can’t show up at a nightclub with an AK-47, in the middle of a nightclub, and pretend to start shooting people, or I mean people —”
“Right,” another speaker interrupts.
“— would get killed, just a stampede, just to get away from him,” Dixon finishes.
In constructing the sting, FBI agents were in communication with prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida, the transcripts show. The prosecutors needed the FBI to show Osmakac giving Amir Jones money for the weapons. Over several conversations, the FBI agents struggled to create a situation that would allow the penniless Osmakac to hand cash to the undercover agent.
“How do we come up with enough money for them to pay for everything?” asks FBI Special Agent Taylor Reed in one recording.
“Right now, we have money issues,” Amir admits in a separate conversation.
Their advantage was that Dabus, the informant, had given Osmakac a job. If they could get Dabus to pay Osmakac, and then make sure Osmakac used his paycheck to make a payment toward the weapons, the agents could satisfy the Justice Department. “Once he gives it to him, it’s his money, whether we orchestrated it or not,” Reed says.
In conversations about this plan, FBI agents refer to Dabus as the “source,” short for confidential human source. “Jake” is FBI Special Agent Jacob Collins, who transcripts indicate worked closely with Dabus.
“The source has to tell him, ‘Hey, listen! You are gonna have to give [Amir] the three hundred bucks,’” says Richard Worms, the squad supervisor. “And that’s something Jake has the source tell him. ‘And I’ll take care of the rest … and here’s three hundred of my money for you.’ Is that something you accept?”
“That’s a feasible scenario,” Amir Jones answers.
“That’s what you’re going to do,” Worms says. “That way, the source has to be coached what to do.”
In order to avoid being vulnerable to entrapment claims, the FBI agents didn’t want their money being used to purchase their weapons in the sting. So they laundered the money through Dabus. In an interview, Dabus implicitly confirmed that arrangement, describing the $20,000 he estimates he received from the FBI as a mix of expenses and compensation.
“It also shows good intent,” Worms says of giving Osmakac the money, according to the transcripts. “He was willing to cough up almost his entire paycheck to get this thing going.”
“That does look really good,” concurs FBI Special Agent Taylor Reed.
AMIR AND OSMAKAC arranged to meet at a Days Inn in Tampa on January 7, 2012. The FBI had the room wired with two cameras, a color one facing the headboard and a black-and-white one looking over the bed and toward the closet door, in front of which Osmakac would film his martyrdom video. Just as the FBI had orchestrated, Osmakac provided the cash to Amir as a down payment on the weapons.
The hotel surveillance video starts at 8:38 p.m. Osmakac is kneeling down on the floor and praying. He then stands and greets Amir, who has laid out the weapons on the bed. There are six grenades, a fully automatic AK-47 with magazines, a handgun and an explosive belt. Outside, a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device is assembled in the bed of Amir’s truck. None of the guns or explosives was functional, but Osmakac didn’t know that.
“You know, they saying they like three trillion in debt, they like 200 trillion in debt,” Osmakac had said, describing their plot. “And after all this money they’re spending for Homeland Security and all this, this is gonna be crushing them.”
Amir shows Osmakac the weapons one by one. He demonstrates how to reload the guns, and how to arm and throw the grenades, as Osmakac had never received weapons training.
“This one’s fully automatic,” Amir says, as Osmakac holds the AK-47.
Osmakac then slips on the suicide vest, as Amir showed him, and sits down in front of the closet, where he’ll record his video. Amir is seated in a chair facing Osmakac, holding the digital camera out in front of him.
The FBI was making a movie — all the agents needed was, in their words, a “Hollywood ending.” Osmakac would give them that final scene.
Osmakac had settled on an Irish bar, MacDinton’s, as his target. The supposed plan, which Osmakac dreamed up with Amir, was for Osmakac to detonate the bomb outside the bar, and then unleash a second attack at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Tampa, before finally detonating his explosive vest once the cops surrounded him.
But that didn’t happen. Instead, FBI agents arrested him in the hotel parking lot. He was charged with attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction — a weapon the FBI had assembled just for him.
After the arrest, according to the sealed transcripts, the FBI agents intended to celebrate their efforts over beers.
“The case agent usually buys,” one of the FBI employees is recorded as saying. Another adds: “That’s true — the case agent usually pops for everybody.”
HOW OSMAKAC CAME to the attention of law enforcement in the first place is still unclear. In a December 2012 Senate floor speech, Dianne Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, cited Osmakac’s case as one of nine that demonstrated the effectiveness of surveillance under the FISA Amendments Act. Senate legal counsel later walked back those comments, saying they were misconstrued. Osmakac is among terrorism defendants who were subjected to some sort of FISA surveillance, according to court records, but whether he was under individual surveillance or identified through bulk collection is unknown. Discovery material referenced in a defense motion included a surveillance log coversheet with the description, “CT-GLOBAL EXTREMIST INSPIRED.”
If he first came onto the FBI’s radar as a result of eavesdropping, then it’s plausible that as part of the sting, the FBI manufactured another explanation for his targeting. This is a long-running, if controversial process known as “parallel construction,” which has also been used by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration when drug offenders are identified through bulk collection and then prosecuted for drug crimes.
In court records, the FBI maintained that Osmakac came to agents’ attention through Dabus. The informant reached out to the FBI after meeting Osmakac, and soon offered him a job at Java Village.
At trial starting in May 2014, Osmakac’s lawyer, George Tragos, argued that the Kosovar-American was a young man suffering from mental illness, who had been entrapped by government agents.
A difficult defense to raise, entrapment requires not only that the government create the circumstances under which a crime may be committed, but also that the defendant not be “predisposed” toward the crime’s execution. “This entire case is like a Hollywood script,” Tragos told the jury, pointing out that the central piece of evidence was that Osmakac used government money to buy government weapons.
A psychologist retained by the defense, Valerie McClain, testified that Osmakac’s psychotic episodes, along with other mental health issues, made him especially easy for the government to manipulate. “When I talked to him most recently, he was still delusional,” McClain testified. “He still believed he could become a martyr.” Six mental health professionals examined Osmakac before his trial. Two hired by the defense and two appointed by the court diagnosed Osmakac with psychotic disorder or schizoaffective disorder. The pair hired by the prosecution said Osmakac suffered from milder mental problems, including depression and difficulty adapting to U.S. culture.
Tragos wasn’t able to tell the jury that FBI agents might have agreed with McClain’s assessment of Osmakac. The transcripts of the accidentally recorded conversations among FBI agents weren’t allowed into evidence, but after the trial, District Judge Mary S. Scriven did agree to unseal a number of them, which were heavily redacted by the government before being entered into the court file.
Prosecutors relied on the undercover FBI recordings and Osmakac’s own words to convict him. They played for the jury Osmakac’s so-called martyrdom video. They showed footage of Amir slipping over Osmakac’s shoulder the strap for the AK-47. They filled the courtroom with exchange after exchange of Osmakac’s hateful and violent rhetoric. Prosecutors played up Osmakac’s most ridiculous remarks, including his desire to bomb simultaneously the bridges that cross Tampa Bay. “The most powerful thing you can see are the defendant’s own words. His intent was to commit a violent act in America,” prosecutor Sara Sweeney told the jury.
Following a six-hour deliberation, jurors convicted Osmakac of possessing an unregistered AK-47 and attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction. In November 2014, he was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison.
“I wanted to go and study the religion … hoping that Allah is gonna cure me one day from the evil inside that I used to believe. But the doctors are saying it’s not evil — it’s mental illness.”
– Sami Osmakac
Entrapment has been argued in at least 12 trials following counterterrorism stings, and the defense has never been successful. Neither Abdul Raouf Dabus nor Russell Dennison testified in or provided depositions for Osmakac’s trial.
The government couldn’t produce Dabus, the FBI’s informant, because he had traveled to Gaza and Tel Aviv, where he says he was receiving treatment for cancer. He says his involvement with the FBI was limited to the Osmakac case — to reporting a suspicious man who was asking about Al Qaeda flags. Dabus disputes the FBI’s claim in court records that he was known to provide reliable information in the past.
“I did my job with them. I went away, and it is over,” Dabus says. “But I do not regret, and I would never regret to call again.”
Before Dabus left the country, the bank was granted approval to sell his Tampa home through foreclosure. His family owed $302,669, or about $50,000 more than the house was worth. Java Village is now shuttered. The signs are still on the outside of the building. Inside, the shelves are knocked over. Canned and dry goods litter the floor. Two dogs now guard the property.
Dennison, the red-bearded man who introduced Osmakac to Dabus, remains a mystery. He left the area shortly after Osmakac’s arrest, and emails he sent in late 2012 to a mutual friend he shared with Osmakac suggest he was fighting in Syria.
Osmakac’s family suspects much of Dennison’s story is a lie, and that he was, and likely still is, working with government agents. How else could Dennison have so conveniently delivered Osmakac to Dabus?
Confidential FBI reports on Dennison, copies of which were provided to The Intercept, do not address whether he’s been linked to a government agency. But the reports suggest the red-bearded man had a peculiar knack for becoming friendly with targets of FBI stings. After Osmakac’s arrest, FBI Special Agents Jacob Collins and Steve Dixon interviewed Dennison at Tampa International Airport, according to one report. Dennison was headed to Detroit, and from there, he said he hoped to go to Jordan to teach English. Dennison described how he was in contact with Abu Khalid Abdul-Latif, whose real name is Joseph Anthony Davis, a 36-year-old Seattle man who, like Osmakac, was troubled and financially struggling, lured by a paid informant into an FBI counterterrorism sting in June 2011. Abdul-Latif is serving 18 years for his crime.
Osmakac is now in USP Allenwood, a high-security prison north of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
“I was manipulated by [the FBI],” Osmakac says in a phone call from prison. He says he only wanted to move to a Muslim country, where he hoped to find a wife. Instead, he says, Dabus and the FBI exploited his mental problems and pushed him in different direction.
“I wanted to go and study the religion and get married, have children, just have nothing to do with this Western world,” Osmakac says. “I wanted to study Arabic and the religion in depth, hoping that Allah is gonna cure me one day from the evil inside that I used to believe. But the doctors are saying it’s not evil — it’s mental illness.”
Osmakac’s family is trying to raise money for an appeal.
“If my brother was truly part of a plot to kill people, I’d be the first one in line to condemn him,” Osmakac’s brother Avni says. “But my brother was mentally ill. We were trying to get him help. The FBI got to him first.”
This story was reported in partnership with the Investigative Fund at The Nation Institute.
Illustration by Jon Proctor for The Intercept
The intel courts authorize torture, forced suicide, murder. The judges should be prosecuted for crimes against humanity.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/03/429429.shtml?discuss
J. Edna Hoover would be proud of these utterly dishonourable methods used in these sting operations. There is nothing honourable or heroic about taking a mentally defective, financially vulnerable person who could not plan a picnic on his own, turning him into a would-be “terrorist” and then putting him in prison for 40 years.
Our security/intelligence agencies were cynical, misleading and often dishonest re: fighting communism. One might wonder if the same security/intelligence agencies are being similarly disingenuous re: fighting terrorism. How are we made safer from communism or terrorism by killing so many poor peasants in smaller, weaker countries?
There is a logic to these FBI would-be-terrorist entrapment/sting cases. They are not secret: I’ve read about many of them over the past few years. They serve to notify anyone who may be thinking of conspiring to commit a terrorist act, or even anyone who is approached by a terrorism recruiter, that they may in fact be talking to undercover FBI. It is a way of sowing mistrust among the would-be domestic terrorists.
So, why are we letting these people into this country, again?
This one was a half-wit who lacked the means to carry out his dreams of terrorist martyrdom. How many don’t?
Isn’t the FBI guilty of inciting terrorism with this BS?
This depraved evil shit is legal?
No wonder Conservatives claim that if American students are exposed to American history they will run off and join ISIL/Daesh.
This guy is as much of a terrorist as they get!! Thank God the FBI busted him , otherwise this guy would be another one joining Isis…wake up people!!
Maybe he needed money. Maybe he was a rapist? Tomato Tomato
https://www.emptywheel.net/2013/09/11/imagine-the-informants-you-can-coerce-when-you-spy-on-every-single-american
If 158 of 508 defendants in federal terrorism-related cases were the target of stings, it means that there were 350 that weren’t. Obviously there are terrorists out there.
Regarding this particular case, we have:
1. A Muslim zealot (Or, less politically correctly, a Muslim fanatic)/aspiring jihadi who admits to wanting to kill Americans/suicide bomber wannabe with some history of religiously-motivated violence, who;
2. After contacting a prominent Muslim who was a) not an FBI source at the time and who, in fact b) had a history of opposing U.S. policy, was clearly very determined to kill people, and who
3. Despite your attempts to minimize or excuse his actions (he was broke, not very smart, and mentally unbalanced) had been smart enough and mentally balanced enough, and above all HAD DETERMINATION AND INITIATIVE ENOUGH to be able to get enough money to get himself to the Syrian border. Obviously he could be very focused when he wanted to be.
Even if he was broke, not very smart, and mentally unbalanced, it doesn’t mean he was harmless or that he didn’t know what he was doing. He not only talked about killing people, but, as the article noted, he clearly and repeatedly took the initiative to find ways to do it. I would say we were lucky that he wanted it to do it Al Qaeda style, with bombs—it would have been much simpler (and cheaper) to steal a cab (kill the driver with a steak knife–cost $5.00?– and dump the body someplace) and drive it into a crowd at a synagogue, church, or shopping mall.
Every dirtbag caught in a sting claims entrapment. At which time, the prosecutor asks the obvious question: “Why didn’t you just say ‘No Thanks,’ and walk away?” Or in this case, just not do anything?
Sorry folks, this was a legitimate bust. Denying that fact won’t change it
I wonder if folks here have read “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” (Ambrose Bierce, 1890)
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/An_Occurrence_at_Owl_Creek_Bridge
How about The Iron Heel by Jack London?
I forgot earlier…
Maybe someone should look at the case involving Tairod Pugh.
Surprised….nope. Like local cops arresting homeless folks on technicalities to keep the private prisons full the Fed’s need
more “terrorists”to keep their budget up and the public scared enough to do what they are told. There ARE real terrorists,
we fund may of them or have created them like ISIS or al Qaeda…but don’t expect those folks to be targeted by your
local FBI joe…to dangerous.
A Failed Terrorist act on American Soul is the same as Actual Terror Act in a Foreign Country. Every couple of months FBI has to ‘Foil’ a terror act to keep the money flowing. Internationally things are different. If ISIS parades a person wearing Orange on TV then lets him go that is not fun, it does not pays the bills. I am not saying ISIS is CIA but if a Car blows up in a marketplace in Iraq and there was a person sitting on the Driver seat does not automatically means it was a suicide attack. Most of the attacks like that nobody ever clams responsibility. We all assume that it was done by a certain party. I have heard thousand time on the Media talking about a certain attack that nobody has claim responsibility but it looks like hallmark of….. In 2006-8, in Pakistan a bomb that blow up right in the middle of a political party really. CNN right away ran the news that bomb blow up near a Shai Mosque and Worshipers were going for the prayers. That was true but totally irrelevant. Problem is bomb blew up on people who were no going to Mosque so does it mean somebody wanted to kill every who did not pray? In 2005-8 A bomb blew up in Iraq outside tomb of One of companions of Prophet named ALI. Media said Sunni did it because Shai consider him (Ali) his spiritual Leader. So assumption is Sunni has something against Ali. In Christians terms if you would imagine somebody bomb tomb of Paul and say it was bombs by protesters because Catholic take lot teaching from Paul. So Protesters dont?
If people do not combine pieces of information and process it to create knowledge then it is like donkey carrying books.
Having worked with people with serious, dangerous mental illness, I can see that with the right guideance, regardless of their actual beliefs, any one of them could be turned into a terrorist. Luckily the guidance and medication thier doctors give them make them mostly harmless. It looks like the FBI is the “right” guideance. A disgusting use of the handicaped as scapegoats to advance their careers. If I did something like this to one of my consumers id be jailed for abuse.
The FBI agent is Hussein Muhammad Amir and not John Smith. That is the main problem ;-) Muslims are very happy to kill themselves. Even a million Sufis cannot help them.
Security forces in the US, over the last say 20+ years, are the “make work” ie current versions of CCC/WPA and other Federal projects 1930’s and 40’s. However they generate no lasting improvements but they do squander tax wealth to be spread lavishly, which is the main purpose and they do it quite well.
Oh no, that poor kid, all he wanted to do was bomb a couple places and shoot some people. What he needs is a hug, and a job, and he’ll completely forget his militant religion and his desire to gut America like a fish.
Oh my…
Thanks again to TI for a story that needed telling.
Explanations of why this even occurred rest solely in the offices of the FBI. But then they are part of the fascist government of the US that is trying (and largely succeeding) to make every citizen solely dependent on said government for their every need. That way they do not question anything said government says or does because it is so important to them and if that government requires them to change their morality to remain sane, then so be it. From droning innocent people in countries all over the world to entrapping delusional people here at home, we have created a government that has nothing to do with “good” and everything to do with further enriching the wealthiest among us.
It is an excellent and valuable story; my congrats to TI as well. I suppose we should look on the bright side: at least these cases are false false-flag capers — not one in which the patsy actually carries out a crime. Such things did happen historically: do a wiki on Dmitriy Bogrov, or Leonid Nikolaev, or Marinus van der Lubbe and see how that might play out.
‘What Connects the Walsall Anarchists, Nazi Pigeons and Ben Affleck? ‘
The same shit, early 20th century England:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJZ7qgsxn9U
This is the way how Kosovo Albanians is giving back credits to US for bombing Serbia in 1999. We warned you that Kosovo is terrorist cell, but Clinton administration was to involved with Albanian lobbyist money at that time.
In world that was logically consistent, and just, the FBI agents who provided the guns and bombs should also be prosecuted for conspiracy to commit terrorism. If the trivial filmed outward appearances of the manipulated sting target are credible evidence of conspiracy to commit a crime, then the outward appearance of providing guns and bombs is also grounds for prosecution and conviction.
Thing like that are why I wrote this:
————————————————-
Helpful
Ah, America
Much that is good
Much that is bad
From the 60’s: America, love it or leave it
In response: America, change it or lose it
More recently:
A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged
A liberal is a conservative who has been arrested
But you can say what you want (within limits)
So when you see something you think is wrong
That should be fixed
That can be fixed
You can protest
However, if you protest loudly, frequently, strongly
Someone may agree with you
Someone you have never seen before
Someone who says that we ought to do something about it
Someone who offers to help you do something about it
Help you get things you could never get yourself
Things you would have never thought of getting
Things that can cause damage
Damage you would have never thought of causing
If this happens
Run like hell
Because the odds are one hundred to one
That this oh-so-helpful person
Works for the FBI (or CIA or NSA or …)
With a goal of sending you to jail
For conspiring to commit a crime
That will never be committed
And that you would never have done
Or even thought of doing
By yourself
There are many lessons you can take from this
So take one
And pass it on
This is an ugly statement to make but given the culture… how many everyday teenage or young adult males (or even middle aged males… look at the militarisation of the police force) would not act like (to paraphrase the FBI) a ‘kid in a candy store’ if allowed to ‘handle’ or ‘play with’ or even own a lot of that weaponry? Without the act, how many wouldn’t think it was ‘cool’ in and of itself to handle weapons they’ve used on their playstation or xbox? I bet even the feds get excited when they get a new firearm. ‘Toys’ or not, a weapon is just an assembled set of moving parts that has been fetishised by so many cultures by now — there is nothing striking about this after you’ve seen a kid play cops and robbers at age 6, ffs…. most people don’t go around killing peple even when they have a shit ton of means to do so. There is no crime until it is USED.
Caveat, I am obviously not talking about REAL wmds.. noone should own nukes, bioweapons, or (deliberately obtained as) chemical weapons. And while ricin is messed up, even that is a grey area to some extent (assuming it is not being made to harm people. The creation of ricin just to try to make ricin no doubt increased due to Breaking Bad’s popularisation of it. People own all kinds of poisons. Any tox major will tell you anything can be a poison: it is only a matter of quantity. But that is a sidetrack).
I would argue even nationstates shouldn’t have that stuff. Or uh tanks and weaponised armored vehicles or tear gas that is actively used against demonstrations. But yeah.
(no I have never tried to make ricin :P)
Good point. I’m sure if the FBI took the average guy out to the desert and let them shoot an uzi and throw grenades, they would all have a blast doing so, agents included. Distinguishing normal enjoyment from this versus genuine intent to harm others would be difficult. It would be like calling a kid playing with fireworks an arsonist or pyromaniac. And yeah, I’m sure the feds get excited when they get a new firearm. It’s probably no different than getting a new hockey stick, or a new cordless drill, or new fishing rod. Not toys, but tools people still get excited over.
To take thisba step further I am willing to bet a lot of these kids are like a lot of people… the idea of meeting and interacting with people vastly different than them and generally villainised probably would interest a lot of people. That does not mean they will actually JOIN them. Or want to be them. So much of what I think we are seeing is playacting on BOTH sides. I bet even if you dropped most of the kids who say they want to go join up they would probably slink back pretty quickly to their own millieu, if they even made it.
It is not a game except… well, both sides are playing a game most of the time in these cases.
When will a journalist have the guts to write a story called, “How the CIA Created 9/11″ ?
Since some prosecutions for terrorism or terror related charges are legit, then the logical conclusion why there are invented plots being brought to fruition(toothless though they be) is to demonstrate the need for more funding. Follow the money, though trite, seems to apply. With most, or maybe all, the people I know. wondering whether they had a conscience has never been a consideration…until lately. Maybe lacking empathy is only a requirement if you go into government, or could be some strange mind control weapon the government uses on all recruits.
Terrorists aren’t born, they’re created. And FBI created them in this case – just for a few bucks. This is a corruption
TS lifestyle with poly probably gets some great sociopathic recruits.
On the face of it, the behavior chronicled cannot be considered honorable therefore, it must be dishonorable. It it is dishonorable, it is corruption.
Well, if you haven’t got enough terrorists to fuel the fear-monger machine, order some from the FBI.
Great job on the story, really great job! Wasn’t there a expose’ on this topic a few years ago by one of the news agencies? I remember watching it, I’m sorry I don’t remember which news agency did it.
——–
I guess my biggest concern on this issue would be the same as most of the large issues plaguing our government agencies and their alliances today; and that is, no one ever goes to jail, and most of the time get off with nothing, not even a reprimand on their permanent employment files. The corporations are let off with a fine which the corp pays, but the people who orchestrate and commit the crime are not even prosecuted and never spend a day in jail.
So knowing our government is actively engaged in the entrapment of mentally deficient people, and knowing no one will ever be punished for destroying so many lives, I have to ask: What’s the point?
The Federal Bureau of Investigation morphed into The Federal Bureau of Inquisition long ago; and much like its historical namesake/model can operate with impunity under the tutelage of the Justice Department and the complicentcy of the Courts.
I think we have a very serious home-grown “domestic terrorism” problem!
Thanks for another well documented piece of reporting!!
“Work is love made visible.” KG
As Usual,
EA
Ethan, I agree!
So basically the FBI is creating terroist, setting them up and arresting them, for money and job security.
Brain washing, entrapping the weak and mentally ill makes us safe?
sure, they do it all the time. soooo much easier than doing real policework to find
real terrorists. also much safer!
of course some times the setup goes badly…..see oklahoma. oops1
I don’t get it. Why would any of you sympathize with this son of a bitch? We’re talking about somebody who broke somebody’s tooth because they were preaching Christianity. Who, despite claims of poverty, was perfectly capable of travelling right up to the Syrian border. All before the FBI got involved in any way, and only after he was looking for al-Qaida flags and guns and ready to plan some kind of mass terror attack. Now I’ve heard about Fred Hampton; I know the FBI isn’t always right. But a guy like this is the sort of guy they’re supposed to be getting rid of. You can’t tell me it’s too unchivalrous because he didn’t have the money or because he was “delusional” as evidenced, the article seems to suggest, by his unwillingness to eat pork on account of his Islamic beliefs (!). Not when the guy, in the end, is willing to record the martyrdom video, plant the bomb, and is ready to use the guns on us. If you excluded from consideration all the idiots in the ranks of the Islamic fundamentalists… who would be left???
You don’t have to want to befriend the subject of this article to find the FBI’s tactics completely unethical.
They groomed a mentally ill kid for an entrapment sting. Without the FBI, there would have been no fake terror plot to “save” us from.
A crime is when you do something, not when you think something, or even call for violent revolution.
You could probably find some shut-in schizophrenic right wing Christian teenager, brainwash them, and get them to put a Nerf bomb in front of a fake Abortion clinic. Or maybe you could provoke a homeless guy to stab a holographic policeman. If you think that’s a good use for law enforcement, the FBI is hiring.
Someone who walks up to the Syrian border isn’t exactly what I’d call a shut-in. A 25-year-old isn’t exactly what I’d call a teenager. Someone who has nightmares about going to hell because he believes in a false religion isn’t exactly what I’d call schizophrenic. A bomb meant to look like a real bomb, placed with real intent to kill people, isn’t exactly what I’d call Nerf. And recruiting the guy to a terror plot when he comes in to buy his al-Qaida flag isn’t what I’d call brainwashing!
The FBI seems to be proceeding from the premise that there could be some Sheikh in Saudi Arabia with $300 million to blow on explosives, weapons, documents, flying lessons … who might find losers from America and other countries and get them to agree to die for him. Gee, I wonder where they possibly could have gotten such an outrageous idea… the message they seem intent on sending, the deterrence they seem interested in creating, is that if someone comes up to you and tries to hire you to be a terrorist, you might want to think twice about it. Now maybe that’s hard, yes, maybe there’s a better way, maybe, but it’s not like Andrew Jackson rounded up all the Kosovars and marched them at gunpoint to Oklahoma, shooting the stragglers as they fell exhausted. And Americans still keep him on the $20 bill! No, in these cases the Intercept has complained about lately, the FBI just goes after people who can be talked into murder plots. Comparatively speaking, that’s pretty restrained, I think – I just wish all their operations were that restrained.
The FBI is desperate to be seen “interrupting terrorist plots” – so they make up their own.
I don’t think it’s noble, brave, or useful to crush some unstable kid under the weight of our insane justice system.
No one is being protected by this. No one.
I think that we’d get better results stopping terrorism if everyone in the military industrial complex got diagnoses, medicine, and talk therapy. This poor kid was set up.
I agree with you in general about “the weight of our insane justice system”. Norway is able to deter crime without nearly so much cruelty in its prisons, and often with shorter terms; this depends in large part on making life better for even the poorest outside prison, so that a milder prison for a shorter term is a better deterrent than even the death penalty in a country where the poor are rendered homeless, and the homeless are persecuted and criminalized. I’m all for overall reform of society, from prisons on up, to improve conditions for the people as a whole. But among those in jail, there are so very many who don’t belong there at all – in jail for drugs they would never have sold if poverty weren’t so terrible, which we never needed to ban in the first place. Kids who are locked up for five years for throwing an M-80 in a mailbox because an “M-80″ is a “bomb” and a mailbox is a “federal” location. Countless injustices. Of all the people I want let out, the one who is going to slit my throat when I draw a picture of Muhammad is way past the end of the queue.
Perfect Victim Theory: In order to care about a victim of injustice, the victim must resemble me and share all of my beliefs.
See Also: Gaza, Ferguson, Drone Casualties.
So much ignorance packed into one sentence.
1. There is no such thing as a “false” religion. (Tho granted, some argue all religion is per se false.)
2. You are not known to have the credentials or capacity to diagnose schizo-affective disorder.
In fact, religious delusions are a very common symptom of schizophrenia. http://www.sciforums.com/threads/religious-delusions-are-common-symptoms-of-schizophrenia.51361/
The article uses words like “disturbed” and “troubled”, but this is far from legally insane. I have great sympathy for those who demand the right to resist forced drugging for mental illnesses when they are capable of refraining from harmful behavior on their own — the flip side of that is that mere “disturbance” isn’t enough to excuse trying to kill people. This person had a chance to make an insanity defense but apparently that didn’t happen. When we carve out an exception for some people to get away with murder, they’d better be people who are genuinely too unreliable for any jihadist group to make productive use of, not just people who aren’t in perfect mental comfort with themselves.
Almost no one is, which is part of the reason our prisons and jails are teeming with the mentally ill.
If you think deluded, paranoid persons with schizo-affective disorder are not truly ill then I question your mental fitness. That, or you have no idea what that mental state and associated behaviors can entail.
No murder was committed here. What happened is that the FBI took a mentally ill “deluded” “retarded fool” without “a pot to piss in,” and who didn’t know how to use firearms, and turned him into a terrorist whose “plot” they foiled. So they sent this ill, “retarded” man to prison for 40 years. That is deeply immoral and disgusting.
The principle used to be that law-enforcement agencies solved crimes, not manufactured them. Or create flim-flam (con-man) schemes complete with accomplice shills to use on dim-bulb subjects.
Q: “Why would any of you sympathize with this son of a bitch?”
A: I’ve suffered from an undiagnosed mental illness the majority of my life and have only recently discovered the cause of my life’s long suffering. The inner torment which I experienced was normal for me. Until I got my diagnosis and started taking medicine, started getting treatment and psycho-education, I just assumed that everyone’s inner experience was just like mine. I’ve come to appreciate that when you look at someone with a mental illness, their body, their mind, is a vessel of emotions and experiences, suffering which from the outside is easily unappreciable. I got help. Shortly before I got help I had the bright idea that self-immolation would be a great political statement that would make a difference in the world. Take that in. Me, a mentally ill person, on a whim, decided after reading some crap on the internet that killing myself would make the world a better place. There’s so much shit in the world, so much suffering. You look at all of this death, depravity, and destruction and you just can’t live with these feeling they hurt so much. So this person, this mentally ill person with a heritage in a part of the world that’s continuously being destroyed by Western imperialism, gets it into his head that blowing shit up and shooting people will make a difference. It makes sense to me. The U.S. and its allies are commiting monstrous acts around the world. What was the number? One in four people in Afghanistan have had a significant other murdered thanks to the West? How does it ‘not’ make sense for a mentally ill person to want to lash out at that?
What I don’t sympathize with is this repulsive, abhorrent Western military mindset that is so far removed from empathy that instead of shepherding a young fragile soul into getting a diagnosis, medicine, and talk therapy, he gets set up by a government with billions of dollars in resources… resources that are being used exactly to set up an innocent and vulnerable person! Go round up every vulnerable muslim person with a mental illness with roots in a country that the West has destroyed and have the CIA turn the screws on them. Set them all up, coerce them, whisper in their ears, give them money and weapons, tease their mental illnesses. Then be sure to filmatize the successes of the counter-terrorism machine which “keeps us safe” from terrorists.
Absent empathy for this young man and people like him you are emptier for it, not better or more whole.
Well said.
Or rational, for that matter.
Any rational agency would have stepped in and provided the right sort of options or help. While still abhorrent to screw with religion and informants, chamces are the guy in this story would have responded as well or even more to a kind friend, or a gentler interpretation of his own religion. Very few mosques, certainly in the US, are going to be extremist. The problem arises when you take informants, put them in these generally peaceable places, and have them hunt out the suggestible like wolves to sheep. ANY established religion (nb, I am agnostic but well-versed) has an open-door policy, generally speaking, when it comes to questions about one’s faith, and few have been incapable of giving helpful advice about their religion to their adherents even if they do not always follow it themselves very well.
Cultural sensitivity would have mattered (do not ‘infiltrate’ houses of worship). Offering an alternate path would have mattered (can you prove intent if he has no other friends and is desperate for any social acceptance? Help him sign up for volunteer work in his community). ‘Have you discussed these questions with your Immam?’ probably would have mattered (as a confidante often does). Pushing an outcome they wanted, in this and many other cases, mattered instead… in the very wrongest direction.
Well said p&c.
Exactly. If this was really about genuine interdiction. But it’s not. Security states aren’t rational, as a matter of course. They’re fearful, and banal. Fear is a career.
‘fear is a career’
What is their established GS career path is the scarier question?
Oh for fuck’s sake. Yeah, a coupla religious nuts get into it outside a Lady Gaga concert, they physically fight, and this means the Muslim one is a danger to the world.
Impoverished, white American young people — who don’t have “a pot to piss in” — make it to Europe every year.
From the article: “Osmakac disputes this, saying he never asked anyone for Al Qaeda flags.”
And guns, yeah, sure thing. The article again:
So then. The FBI targeted a young man whom they knew to be “delusional,” and whom they also knew, in their words, “didn’t have a pot to piss in,” and they sell him some guns he hasn’t any idea how to use. Then prosecute and convict.
And the mentally ill “fool” is now in prison for forty fucking years. (Land of the free! USA! USA! USA!)
Gee, are we safe now, or what!?
“Gee, are we safe now, or what!?”
Not as long as people who adopt a prejudiced and narrow-minded mental and spiritual focus — such as that which appears to drive Wnt’s arguments — persist in pursuing ignorance.
I don’t believe he couldn’t plan and execute an attack. A fanatic with a five dollar knife can manage to slit a few throats just fine In London one of them used an ax. I mean, the guy is willing to blow people up with a bomb, ready to use any guns he’s given (I think he can find the trigger in time…) but you’re telling me that he never would have attacked unless someone helped him, so we should ignore the laws he actually broke.
I actually am fairly liberal about some of the issues regarding drones, Gaza, and so forth, but cuddling up to terrorist fanatics who are willing to kill people because aww, they’re too dumb and helpless to really be held to blame for anything… that’s the kind of foolhardiness that gives liberals a bad name!
And this is a matter of faith, the evidence of things not seen?
From the FBI who spent all kinds of time with this kid: “Osmakac was, in the FBI’s own words, “a retarded fool” who didn’t have any capacity to plan and execute an attack on his own. ”
So, we now conduct stings on the huge male population who have the potential to commit homicide for various reasons? Or just Muslims?
Your mom loves and is proud of you.
Just fyi, I think you make really interesting and thoughtful points, Wnt. I know you take a lot of shit from the comment-eratie here (I became extraordinarily wary of them after, on more than one occasion, commenters resorted to bold-faced lies about me when they didn’t have an answer for my arguments. If they’re willing to resort to making shit up about me when it suits their purpose, odds are good they’re willing to do it at other times.), but even if they’re the ones commenting, they’re not the only ones reading.
What is that impresses you as thoughtful? Wnt’s notion that Muslims practice a “false” religion?
Have you ever seen the show “Bait Car”? The cops take a nice looking car, rig it with cameras and a way to remote-lock all the doors and shut off the engine, pretend to have an argument, leave it with the keys in it in some poor neighborhood, and before long … somebody shows up to take it. Sometimes I get some laughs out of it, sometimes it seems petty … after all, they are taking advantage sometimes of kids who ought to have known better, who were just poor and being stupid that day. Now if you want to write your Congressman and tell him to let all those kids go, I can kind of see that – after all, the worst they’re probably gonna do is steal my car. But why start the charity parade here?
Mona, you out and out lied about me in public when you tried to humiliate me by telling others that I am secretly, in disguise, some old poster who I gather you all considered a pathetic loon. So I don’t trust you, and I’m not responding to you at this point. If in the future you apologize or appear to show a change in behavior, maybe, but for now that’s where we’re at.
A surmise. Speculation — informed speculation.
Look pal, if I refused to interact with the legions who have accused me of being Glenn in drag, well, I guess I’m not the delicate flower y’all are.
I believe the standard defense is to protest that your lies are noble and good. You seem to have gone straight to Orwellianism and simply redefined what a falsehood is.
If you feel you have to be tough and resort to falsehoods because of the position you’re in, because of the important ends you’re working toward, fine. But if you accept that explanation for yourself, avoiding hypocrisy means you accept it for everyone.
The premise aside — that any of us should sympathize with him, or not — the real question is, what did the suspect do, and what was he guilty of, as opposed to his handlers’ guilt? We’re talking about suspects that may have neither had the coherent mental capacity nor the means to produce a crime — at least until the FBI provided both. You need the criminal intent — mens rea — and the act — actus reus to complete criminal guilt. I come up with the pretty Latin phrases because that’s what they teach the FBI and other law enforcement, not to mention the US prosecutors that put this charade together for a Federal judge and jury. But being a bad person isn’t in itself a crime, especially if, left alone, they’re left to their incapacity and their incoherence. The FBI used to go after real, capable bad guys, and this guy ain’t Machine Gun Kelly.
Now do you get it?
Sounds like another successful sting by the Federal Bureau of Instigation, making sure that the American Chicken Littles keep nervously looking up at the sky.
The FBI should be closed.
From Aaron Swartz to Bruce Ivins, both innocent men driven to suicide, not forgetting the sad list of publicized “suspects” later exonerated like Steven Hatfield or Richard Jewel, the FBI doesn’t solve crimes, they attack their suspects as viciously as a pack of rabid dogs in a day care center. Remember Waco? Remember Ruby Ridge?
Here’s one “sting” that didn’t get much national attention.
After the Ferguson report, it turns out they’re shocked — SHOCKED! — to discover a systematic and intentional abuses of State power. As if.
Remember too 911. The Minneapolis branch of the FBI arrested Zacarias Moussaoui a month before the 911 attacks and yet were ordered to NOT search his computer by the Washington office.
The FBI isn’t a police agency.
Its sordid history suggests a political enforcement bureau — ignoring actual crimes (mortgage crisis, torture, political corruption, etc.) and convincing distressed people to become terrorists — not to prevent terrorism but to promote their institutional image (and therefore their funding and their legal impunity.)
Shut it down.
“Shut it down.”
Seconded.
From Aaron Swartz to Bruce Ivins, both innocent men driven to suicide, not forgetting the sad list of publicized “suspects” later exonerated like Steven Hatfield or Richard Jewel, the FBI doesn’t solve crimes, they attack their suspects as viciously as a pack of rabid dogs in a day care center. Remember Waco? Remember Ruby Ridge?
And then there was/is COINTELPRO. What is it called, now?
As bad as this is — and it’s awful. There are other FBI “activities” that also need to be exposed.
COINTELPRO never died. The FBI renames it and does the same garbage over and over. The FBI tried to set me up in 1972, after COINTELPRO was allegedly over. I found the field agents ID in his sock drawer. He was a bit strange and sloppy. Too bad Sami was too mentally ill to figure out that he was being set up.
It is an injustice to compare Aaron Swartz to this guy. Sure, both might have had some ideological motivation, but… imagine you’d walked up to Aaron Swartz and asked him how about not just downloading some JSTOR documents, you have a bomb and some machine guns and can get him to JSTOR headquarters. Do you think Swartz would have said yeah sure, let’s do that, or do you think he’d look at you like you’d grown a second asshole between your lips and sprayed a wet fart in his face? I’m pretty damn sure it would be answer B. That’s because Swartz, no matter what some authoritarians claimed, was not a criminal. Prosecuting him that way was indeed a grave injustice. But it wouldn’t be for someone who’s ready to go for option A.
So when you’re mugged, the police ask you, “What did you do to deserve to be mugged?”
Do you see a problem with this?
Okay, try this:
Guy comes into a hospital with a bloody head wound, the doctor says, “Sorry pal. Go somewhere else and bleed. You’re crazy. You deserved it.”
But this doesn’t really capture the venality of the FBI.
Because the FBI actually exploits this man’s distress.
Guy comes into a hospital with a bloody head wound, the doctor says, “Sure, we’ll help you pal. First, here’s a gun … <> SECURITY, EMERGENCY in the ER … bloody patient has a gun. He’s threatening to use it.”
And this doesn’t quite capture it either because once the guy’s handcuffed and taken to the pokey, the ER doctor fills out insurance forms claiming to have treated the guy for cancer. Who’s going to challenge the report?
Sure Aaron Swartz wasn’t the same as David Koresh or Randy Weaver.
So what?
Pit bull puppies aren’t kittens. That doesn’t mean you get to torture them.
Great metaphor.
That’s what “law enforcement” is. Mugging the people who deserve it. There’s lots of people I’d say don’t deserve it, but people willing to blow me up for al Qaida? I agree that jail shouldn’t be torture, though it very often is… we should fix that. But lots of pit bull puppies spend a short life in the shelter before they get put to sleep, and I don’t feel too bad that they don’t let out into the wild either.
quote”That’s what “law enforcement” is. Mugging the people who deserve it.”unquote
hey, whattsamatta bunky, didn’t that plastic badge and G-man ring work out when you tried to mug your sister?
Son, I know it’s difficult existing in the real world, but walking around the neighborhood in a goofy homemade G-man outfit that doesn’t fit, isn’t exactly ..well..let’s just call it “normal”. Comprende? Here’s a suggestion. Next time you get a hankerin to play G-man..try banging your head against the wall a few times first. Then, slowly, say to yourself.. I am an idiot. 10 times. Do this every morning when you wake up. I garontee son, sooner or later.. you just might get a fucking grip. Meanwhile, I suggest this. Eat shit you fucking moron.
Yeah, mug those who deserve mugging and rape those that deserve rape, after all they asked for it. Mighty Christian of you.
You guys are blowing his statement out of proportion. All he said was Swartz shouldn’t be compared to this guy. Swartz was basically a good guy with noble intentions. This guy was mentally ill with less than stellar ambitions he may not have had control over.
Please read my posts.
Comparing Jesus with Barabbas isn’t the point. My post is about the Romans.
Metaphor Alert –> (The FBI = the Romans) <–Metaphor Alert.
Saying one target is better than the other doesn't refute or challenge my original post. Why not compare Richard Jewel with Wen Ho Li? What difference does it make??
Comparing Swartz with Osmakac is like comparing the victims of a rapist, arguing one was asking for it and one wasn't.
The point isn't the victims; the point is the crime.
When the FBI repeatedly trample the rights of their targets, consistently exploit their institutional power to achieve political or personal goals, and regularly engage in deceptive, abusive, and scurrilous tactics they become the story.
Further, these reported incidents don't begin to cover their clandestine acts and influence.
Above all else, a police agency like the FBI must act with integrity and honesty. Otherwise they become just another institutional faction divvying up State assets while screwing the public.
The FBI has ceased representing the interests of the State and now represent their own institutional interests — at the very least! (See Michael Grimm as an indication of possibly greater institutional dysfunction.)
He specifically brought up comparing Swartz to Osmakac, YOU brought up the FBI. This whole article is about the FBI framing people, but lumping this guy with Swartz discredits Swartz more than making the FBI look bad (they do a good job of that themselves). Swartz is a figure people could get behind in protest of FBI abuse, Osamakac doesn’t have the same mass appeal.
FFS
I don’t mind if my broccoli touches my mashed potatoes and my mashed potatoes mix with my meatloaf on my dinner plate.
Some people are more fastidious.
I don’t need to repeat myself.
Again.
FBI’s 30 Year Mafia Crime Spree Interview with Peter Lance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NomqUWXv7YU
Just extending my sincere compliments to Mr. Trevor Aaronson for this story.
It clearly demonstrates; on a case study basis, exactly how an agency (FBI being one of many) acting under the umbrella of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence deliberately plans, manufactures, and promotes the concept of “terror” in order to wage a fictional “War on Terror” upon the citizens of all international state governments.
That “war” is a disgraceful plotted farce and must be stopped. It is only enriching the coffers and greedy interests of the Central Banking Cartel and their puppets who embody the 0.01% of the world’s elite population.
It is my hope that this article will be added to the growing body of evidence that can be used as a stop measure by those brave enough to expose the extent of the control plot and call a final halt to the destructive nonsense that all wars represent.
How many millenniums of this dead-end game must humanity endure?
It is incumbent upon all individual’s in possession of conscience to reject the machinations of the few that destroy the many.
It is an individual choice and when enough individuals make that choice ( the point of critical mass); and they collectively choose to target those at the top of the pyramid, that pyramid of control will topple.
Meanwhile, I also hope that this story aids the Osmakac family to raise money for an appeal; and that they get it as well as justice for “Sami”.
This justice would include bringing the true “terrorists”; —— those within and composing the FBI (the agency itself) and the rest of those masquerading “terrorist” alphabet agencies that fall under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence —– also those individual politicians occupying positions at the upper echelons of the three branches of the Federal government —– to speedy arrests for their treasonous crimes of fabricating terror against the American people and Foreign National States.
A big thank you to Mr. Trevor and his sources.
‘Informant-led sting operations are central to the FBI’s counterterrorism program. Of 508 defendants prosecuted in federal terrorism-related cases in the decade after 9/11, 243 were involved with an FBI informant, while 158 were the targets of sting operations. Of those cases, an informant or FBI undercover operative led 49 defendants in their terrorism plots, similar to the way Osmakac was led in his.’
….and those are just the ones that we know about.
Bearing in mind that several of the 911 hijackers were closely connected to FBI informants…..oh fuck it, just read this if you are interested:
http://digwithin.net/2012/11/21/louis-freeh/
Excellent link Myers.
That should serve to open a few eyes to the truth!
Anyone with education in Aeronautics or Demolitions would have questioned the Government’s official explanation of an aircraft hitting the Pentagon.
Too bad that the FBI confiscated all of the evidence.
See: “Plane hitting Pentagon… NOT!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjCx-B6xjSY
Why post such nonsense here? There is a huge amount of evidence that it was an AA jet (just a small amount here):
You are an idiot.
Really?
Please feel free to cite a reference for your “educated” opinion. Perhaps you have written a scientific paper specifically explaining why it is aerodynamically impossible for a Boeing 757 to have flown into the Pentagon at that elevation above the ground on 9/11.
See: “9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon”
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/02/911-update-more-proof-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/
“This article explains why high-speed flight in relatively close proximity to the ground is virtually impossible – in any fixed-wing aircraft*.
[* An exception would be cruise-type missiles, whose flying surfaces are more akin to horizontal fins than wings, and thus have extremely high wing loadings (lbs/sf) — much higher even than of ground-attack fighter-bombers. NB: Commonly invoked photos of aircraft in flight close to the ground do not depict flight at anywhere near maximum speed; they are photos taken of craft flying at greatly reduced throttle settings – which is what actually happens during any landing!]
This discussion will delineate why the highly energized ground effect region beneath the wings, whose intensity is directly proportional to the lift generated by the aircraft, would prevent the craft from getting any closer to the ground than approximately one half its wingspan while flying at high speed.
In the case of a Boeing 757, given its wingspan of 124 feet, this would equate to roughly 62 feet AGL.
[NB: Sixty-two feet is a theoretical minimum; a practical minimum would actually be considerably higher. In a real-world situation (such as allegedly at the Pentagon), a pilot — especially one as demonstrably inept as Hani Hanjour who could barely fly a trainer — probably could not have got within 100 feet of the ground in a Boeing 757 flying at 400 mph.]”
I would encourage interested people to read the full paper. It is quite damning and the physical science is sound.
I think that the official Government explanation is a lie and that Americans should be provided with the truth.
Too bad for the people that refuse to acknowledge the value of transparency and truth in Governments and/or those that simply can’t handle the truth because of some perceived loss or fear associated with cognitive dissonance.
The Intercept is free to delete my comments as they are free to delete yours Mike Sulzer.
Your latest reference says:
Conservation of momentum implies that if air is diverted downward, the plane must be rising. Obviously level flight is possible, and therefore there is no net downward diversion of air in that case. This nut you refer to has attempted to make his own explanation of how an airplane wing produces lift, all for the purpose of demonstrating that a 757 did not crash into the Pentagon. If you believe nonsense such as this, why should anyone believe anything you write?
There are many, many people who do not buy the lies that the MSM shoved down the throat of world citizens on behalf of a corrupted U.S. Government in order to advance a criminal War on Terror.
It is futile to argue one point which clearly defines only one of the many dubious points of contention with the official narrative offered by the government to explain the events of 9/11….particularly within the confines of a forum.
It is also not an imperative for anyone to believe any thing that I say but it is important that each person continue to question and investigate the matter for themselves.
Your willingness to condemn my questioning, and the questioning of others, as “conspiracy theory” is telling in itself as a motive to further obscure and suppress the truth.
You have already lost.
It will be impossible to suppress all of the “conspiracy theorists” from forcing a re-opening of an independent investigation into 9/11.
See: “The 9/11 Commission Didn’t Believe the Government … So Why Should We?”
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/03/911-commissioners-didnt-believe-government.html
You are not questioning anything; you are simply believing crap for your own reasons.
@ Mike Sulzer:
You do not know me and I do not know you therefore; you are not qualified to assess my character, level of intelligence, or my motivations.
Based on your comments, inability to produce any references, and clear refusal to comprehensively read those that I have provided; I have concluded that you have a serious problem in that you believe the lies that the Federal Government has been telling.
It appears that you question nothing because you have been programmed to dance like a puppet on a string in 3D.
I might have felt sorry for you if you weren’t such an obvious ass and your pompous demeanor did not preclude that possibility.
Given that; stick it!
The conservation of momentum requires no reference, and I do not need to know you in order to understand when a reference you make violates it.
Lyra should pay more attention to Conservation of Energy, given that Mike Sulzer possesses lots of Moments of Inertia and a high Coeffcient of Adhesion to that great Dick, Richard Cheney.
Of all the events on 9/11, the one that I cannot digest is the collapse of Building 7 in the WTC complex. No plane hit it, the fire wasn’t hot enough to melt the steel, and yet it collapsed into itself at free-fall velocity. I used to be a Member of the American Society of Civil Engineers, but I have since relinquished my membership as I am of the opinion that the ASCE members who wrote the 9/11 report cowed down before the criminals and relinquished their professional ethics during their investigation into the collapse of particularly Building 7 which points to very sinister hands well removed from the caves of Tora Bora or the guilded palaces of Baghdad.
The hallmark of a delusional conspiracy theorist is latching on to a single detail whilst ignoring everything else, and bludgeoning you to death with a great Wall of Text.
The truth is out there, but you won’t find it if you think you already know.
http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/q/6187
“The truth is out there, but you won’t find it if you think you already know.”
Quite true Ben S. Merely pointing out that the US Official narrative on 9/11 is comprised of obvious lies.
Consider this other point of contention with that narrative:
“9/11: The Mysterious Collapse of WTC Building 7 was Not An Inside Job”
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/09/911-at-least-this-aspect-of-it-was-not-an-inside-job.html
As you can see there certainly are volumes of “conspiracy theorists” demanding the truth.
Kind of disappointing. I link to an article that shows (citing 70 sources of information) the same kind of extreme corruption of FBI counter terrorism operations, only to a degree that far exceeds that written about in the Intercept piece, and with far greater consequences; the only replies are about the Pentagon crash and the bankrupt label of ‘conspiracy theorist’…….FFS
Where was the critical journalism that asked the questions about the FBI pre 911, that asks how we got into this fucking mess in the first place??
The silence is telling.
You are correct Myers but I am not a journalist and I wouldn’t be too eager to invite comment from the trolling ones that frequent TI.
I am still digesting your material, some of which is familiar to me.
Go ahead.
Start with J. Edgar Hoover and Allen Dulles.
Please discuss: Operation Mockingbird.
Afterthought on Mockingbird:
“MOCKINGBIRD: The Subversion Of The Free Press By The CIA”
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/MOCK/mockingbird.php
“As terrible as it is to live in a nation where the press in known to be controlled by the government, at least one has the advantage of knowing the bias is present, and to adjust for it. In the United States of America, we are taught from birth that our press is free from such government meddling. This is an insideous lie about the very nature of the news institution in this country. One that allows the government to lie to us while denying the very fact of the lie itself. “
great read. incredible story. I remember reading about it in VOA or about some similar case. even in description by mainstream media cases like that seem dubious. to get to know how it all works is breathtaking. I pity this guy a lot. they could help him. but they used so much money and time to do just the opposite.
just to think how we could use all this money and recurses – poverty would be no more. but instead we create more miseries. its amazing
Well, it hardly seems sporting. How is a poverty stricken Muslim to know whether he is being set up by the FBI… or being offered a genuine opportunity by the CIA??
BINGO!! Give this man a prize.
“Oh, yeah, you could tell,” yet another person chimes in. “He was all like, like a, like a six-year-old in a toy store.”
“He was all like, like a, like …”
What’s the difference between an FBI agent and a 6 yr old?
One is an copycat adolescent looking for peer approval while pretending he is a G-man, and the other doesn’t wear a gun.
quote”After the arrest, according to the sealed transcripts, the FBI agents intended to celebrate their efforts over beers.
“The case agent usually buys,” one of the FBI employees is recorded as saying. Another adds: “That’s true — the case agent usually pops for everybody.”unquote
sheeezusHchrist.. if weather was incredulity, the FBI would be a fucking 5.9 hurricane.
Actually I think this whole thing reminds me of American frats, hazing, etc…
Excellent article. Sounds like the prosecutors and the FBI agents were working on their careers. They needed a counter-terrorism case for advancement. They had to work pretty hard to make their weapon-less, cash-less target look like the real thing and to hide their roles in stage-managing the production. But they got the conviction, even though they didn’t protect any citizens from any threats.
Do we know how this turned out for the producers? Bonuses? Raises? Promotions? Appointments to judgeships?
Tampa is at best a second-tier, and probably a third-tier, appointment, to an FBI agent. You do not get assigned there because you are the best of the best (the wondrous machinating New York office would be an example of a first rate posting). So you have people in Tampa who want to be promoted to offices that are well-known for confabulation and manipulation of informant-heavy setups. As Arendt said, evil is banal. These agents may or may not understand what they are doing, or why, but they almost certainly believe they do, and they most likely do it because that is the example put forward as the gold standard. The ones in Manhattan, LA, et al, then do it for the larger reasons. It’s a lifecycle of interacting systems…. Not merely a system.
If you just consider the number of taxpayer dollars that went to pay government employees to conjure up a fake plot with this vulnerable doofus as its patsy, and then to push that wet noodle case through the taxpayer funded legal system, and then to incarcerate that set-up patsy at taxpayer expense — it makes me feel all Grover Norquist.
Entrapment is almost impossible to prove due to the predisposition part. It’s easy to prove the FBI provided the means to carry out an action. It is damn near impossible to prove that the person wouldn’t have acted that way if they didn’t receive the material support. It pretty much turns into a character assassination, with the prosecution smearing the defendant really badly.
Keith, I have been reading your comments, and am curious as to your (or others’) opinion on something…
If a sting is attempted once and turned down, then again with the same result then again and again and again from different angles, agencies and/or people, and eventually such people wind up almost exclusively experiencing ‘friendships’ aimed at such an end result, at what point does predisposition get ‘decided on’? ‘Oh it was just not the right carrot to dangle?’ would seem to be the fed result if/when someone finally gave in.
Another question: for someone isolated then targeted by someone being really nice to them… such an informant must seem like a tall cool glass of water on a very dry landscape… can that really be seen as predisposition? How can one differentiate when desperation for basic Maslowian needs is at all a factor?
The fact that this is not taken into account when entrapment is debated legally (and let’s be real: it’s never even considered in almost every legal case) is a terrible injustice.
Great work, and a big thank you to whoever gave this evidence to The Intercept. A couple of years ago another troubled man was entrapped by the government into attempting to carry out a bombing of the Wichita, Kansas airport, and I’d love for The Intercept to look into that case as well:
“The judge says defense claims of entrapment and outrageous government conduct cannot be determined before the trial. Loewen was arrested after a sting operation in which undercover FBI agents posed as co-conspirators and gave him the fake explosives.”
Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/news/local/crime/article12836642.html#storylink=cpy
Wow! Now that’s reporting!!! Well-done!
Why would U.S. Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli collude with part of or provide cover to these conspiratorial shenanigans?
Oh, there is this — “Federal prosecutor appointed as U.S. magistrate judge”, http://tbo.com/news/federal-prosecutor-appointed-as-us-magistrate-judge-89227
He was appointed in mid August 2009, so it wasn’t a reward for anything he did in this case. But his appointment comes up for renewal (or not) in the summer of 2016, so maybe he is acting with an eye toward that.
Can a career prosecutor ever be a reasonable or unbiased/fair judge? I am not sure a defense attorneu can, but I am almost certain a prosecutor, brought up through a prosecutorial mindset-pushing environment, cannot.
Hi, is anyone else having problems with the Audio?
Well done FBI. May you catch many more Islamofascists. These people are incompatible with civilization and must be either incarcerated or eradicated.
Truly despicable. I hate that our vaunted FBI gets away with this. I do wonder if there is a member of that jury reading this, and what their feelings are now. I know, should I ever be called to sit on a jury for something like this, I’m going to have a terrible time deciding whether I should divulge the impression this story has had on me. And, how utterly unlikely I’m going to take any of the prosecutors “evidence” at face value. Nice job, FBI. The next hung jury might be your own doing. This story leaves a really bitter taste in my mouth that is going to hang around for a very long time.
And, to echo Mona, many, many thanks to the source for this story. Without brave, principled people like yourself, we’ve absolutely no hope of addressing these travesties. I hope the family is able to mount an appeal. If ever one was deserved additional review, this case seems deserving.
Yeah, this is ridiculous:
“In order to avoid being vulnerable to entrapment claims, the FBI agents didn’t want their money being used to purchase their weapons in the sting. So they laundered the money through Dabus. In an interview, Dabus implicitly confirmed that arrangement, describing the $20,000 he estimates he received from the FBI as a mix of expenses and compensation.”
Having a paid FBI informant pay for the weapons, instead of having an FBI employee buy the government’s own fake weapons, is what is called a distinction, without a difference.
When the US police arrest people for drug and sex offences, do the police supply the money to the Johns and the addicts?
You know who would be good at coming up with this sort of scheme? Psychologists. Sounds like the most brilliant plan since they got psychologists on the US government payroll, to devise torture tactics for the CIA, …I would expect that before they rolled this tactic out, it was first formulated by experts in manipulating mentally ill people. The plan obviously works…they scour the country for the mentally ill so they can lend them money to buy fake bombs from the FBI.
“Throughout Osmakac’s trial, the defense team argued that their client was mentally ill and had been steered toward radical and violent ideas by FBI agents and a confidential informer whose identity and motive were never revealed. Moreover, Osmakac was essentially broke and would have been unable to buy weapons if the FBI had not given money to the informer, who then gave it to Osmakac, they said.
The weapons he bought were also provided by the FBI. And in the ultimate sign of the agency’s regard for Osmakac’s know-how, the car bomb came with instructions telling him how to detonate it.”
http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/criminal/sami-osmakac-gets-40-years-in-prison-for-plotting-terrorist-attacks-in/2205214
What possible excuse could the FBI have, assuming they had to answer to a real judge? …that Osmakac could, left to his own devices, in the future, possibly commit some crime? Even then, wouldn’t his paranoia, or his schizo-affective disorder mean that some form of protective medical custody was in order?
“Would the defendant have undertaken whatever they are accused of if not for the government’s involvement?
This requires a deeper level of thinking than the first two questions. As with any counterfactual, reaching a conclusive answer is difficult. But in the Newburgh case, a federal judge remarked on the record that “only the government could have made a terrorist out of Mr. Cromitie [the suspect], whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in scope.” Then, in her written decision upholding the conviction, the judge lamented the fact that “[t]he Government indisputably ‘manufactured’ the crimes of which Defendants stand convicted. The Government invented all of the details of the scheme.””
http://www.vice.com/read/three-questions-you-should-ask-when-you-hear-about-a-foiled-terrorist-plot-310
Outstanding article, and may there be more like this:
Many thanks to the source: Live long and prosper, in utter anonymity.
Also known as lying to the Court and to the defense. And, among other things, precluding a challenge based on 4th Amendment violations.
Just as only the government may legally bribe a witness, with “parallel construction” government also arrogates unto itself an exemption from the duty of truth and candor to and in the Court.
Jistice is an illusion when the system can decide which laws to enforce, or on which rules it chooses to follow and which defendents to prosecute. There IS no justice. Why hasn’t this “parallel construction” abomination been challenged in court? Because the deck is illegally stacked, and not in the people’s favor and they want to keep it that way. The lawlessness running rampant in the very entities responsible for exeuting the laws, under oath, I might add, is galling to the Nth degree.
HI there –
I seem to remember there has been some sort of challenge… tried a cursory search – this article does make mention of possible challenges…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-van-buren/parallel-construction-unc_b_5606381.html
When ‘criminals’ do this the sentencing guideline rises substantially. Lying to the opposing counsel, creating false evidence trails, committing perjury, and covering up crimes often gets more time than the original crime.
Where is NBC, MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC, NPR, PBS, CSPAN, The Washington Post, New York Times, Fox News, Wall Street Journal? too busy with Justin Bieber news? Twerking news? Kardashian news? I think WaPo and the NYT are morphing into real estate/celebrity news magazines.
Lots of news organizations, but no real news.
The Intercept has probably the smallest budget of any online news source, yet it easily out performs so-called Mainstream Media.
ALL of the organizations you mention are corporate. There is your answer. The USA! USA! USA! is a corporate monolith.
It’s unfair to judge the FBI by quality of the worst terrorists they produce. Even Picasso produced some pretty mediocre paintings. If after his first bad painting, he’d stopped and decided to become a lumberjack, there might have been fewer ruined canvases but there would have been more dead trees. So it’s a tough call.
My personal feeling is that the FBI should stick with it. The CIA also had many failures. They eventually learned that when you allow the plots to reach fruition, it garners a lot more attention. The resulting publicity assures your funding will be increased. So the FBI just needs to fiddle with the formula a bit, and they’ll eventually hit the sweet spot.
:) I laughed.
Spoken like a true fascist.
As satire goes, that’s a bit spot on. You do realize the FBI and CIA read TI and troll the comments section?!
See there Benny… they keep trying to create masterpieces on paper when they should be looking for some cloth (preferably whole). The medi[a/um] is the message, guys.
Given the resources the FBI spends on manufacturing terrorist plots, one has to wonder how much is left over for disrupting actual criminal enterprises. This is clearly being done to ensure the continual flow of $$ to the FBI and has nothing to do with keeping anyone safe. That taxpayer money is being spent for this kind of nonsense is outrageous.
So the FBI provided material support to a terrorist. I’m pretty sure that’s against the law. And because the FBI, in theory at least, uses American tax dollars to fund its operations, they have, by implication, made each American tax payer complicit in this illegal action. Wow, the FBI sure knows how to create criminals.
Wouldn’t it be great to have some way to denounce a particular action by our government, as if to say you didn’t do that in MY name, and give my taxes back. Just a goofy thought.
‘Twould be good. I guess one could stop paying taxes entirely, but that sends a rather different, less specific statement.
Hey, jgreen7801 –
This came up before, remember? Some of us thought maybe some website to do just that would indeed be a good idea. But that’s as far as it got. Any way we can get it together or get some org to do such a site – thoughts anyone??? Why can’t we do something to turn this into a reality.
I couldn’t get audio to work. Great article, though –but very sad.
horribly, horribly, horribly sad.
Incredible insight on how the U.S. intelligence services justify their high budgets by concocting these “terrorist” plots and the self congratulations that follow. Kudos to the Intercept and the author for this incredible story.
Interesting article. Could you check the link to the transcripts, I could not get it to load. Thx
Incredible story and writing, Trevor. Genuinely remarkable. Congratulations to you and your source.
It’s a pretty common claim that the FBI’s anti-terror victories are essentially entrapment plots. But this illustrates and proves it conclusively. It’s shocking how thin the bureau’s case is. They busted a confused kid for the crime of falling for a highly funded psychological operation.
The next time anyone is asked to back up the claim that the FBI fabricates its own fake terrorism to bust, send ’em to this piece.
Following a six-hour deliberation, jurors convicted Osmakac of possessing an unregistered AK-47 and attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction. In November 2014, he was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison.
he was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison.
he was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison.
he was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison.
How many years was he sentenced? Was it a state prison?
Lucky for him there won’t be social security when he is done doing his 36 years or so!
I wonder if they’ll put him in adseg, solitary or supermax?