(This is an item from our new blog: Unofficial Sources.)
Despite a decline in military spending since 2010, U.S. defense expenditures are still 45 percent higher than they were before the 9/11 terror attacks put the country on a seemingly permanent war footing.
And despite massive regional buildups spurred by conflict in the Ukraine and the Middle East, the U.S. spends more on its military than the next seven top-spending countries combined, according to new figures compiled by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
That’s nearly three times as much as China, and more than seven times as much as Russia.

The share of world military expenditure of the 15 states with the highest expenditure in 2014. (Source: SIPRI)
Saudi Arabia is now the fourth-biggest military spender on the globe, which in its case means spending nearly $80 billion last year buying weapons, mostly from the U.S., and most notably including fistfuls of F-15 fighters and top-of-the-line attack helicopters.
As Mark Mazzetti and Helene Cooper reported for The New York Times over the weekend, the new arms race in the Middle East has resulted in a “boom” for American defense contractors.
U.S. military spending has now fallen by 20 percent since its peak in 2010. But overall, the world’s arms bazaar is doing just fine, reports SIPRI, as “reductions in the United States and Western Europe were largely matched by increases in Asia and Oceania, the Middle East, Eastern Europe and Africa.”
China, Russia and Saudi Arabia all “substantially increased their military expenditures,” with the Saudis now spending a staggering 10 percent of their GDP on military expenditures — although it’s doubtful they can even feel it.
In a supplemental report, SIPRI reports on how the crisis in the Ukraine has led to “a renewed commitment by NATO members to spend at least 2 per cent of their gross domestic product (GDP) on the military.” The U.S. is spending 3.5 percent of its GDP on military expenditures.
(Photo of F-15s. Getty Images)


I agree with the argument that there are terrorist groups and other organizations out there that the United States has to be wary of, but spending $500 billion more than China, the country with the second largest military budget, is a bit ridiculous. Former top ranked Wall Street analyst Henry Blodget even stated, “U.S. military spending has soared over the past decade, and we now spend $700+ billion a year on our military.”
There is a reason the Budget Control Act was passed, even Congress realized we were spending too much! I will agree that making drastic cuts is not the answer, but I believe that maintaining or increasing the current spending is absolute ludicrous. The United States does not need to make an extreme cut, but I believe reducing military spending at a reasonable rate will be a step in the right direction.
Many people say that we need to protect ourselves from terrorist groups such as ISIS, which is a fair argument; but let us look at the numbers again. At most, ISIS made about $2 billion last year (according to http://www.slate.com); the United States on the other hand, is spending about $700 billion. That is 350x more that ISIS made in total in 2014, and they know that. Going up against the United States will bring nothing but trouble for ISIS.
In conclusion, the best path for the United States to take is to begin to decrease military spending in small increments, so that it does not get further out of hand.
-Justin
Well, great!
They must be finally getting ready to attack Russia and China and while at it they should do it at the same time.
One of the few “interesting” adage I have learned from gringos is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy's_Law
Isn’t that the “greatest ever good” they could ever seek to do?
Will they become more sensical afterwards and invest more money in public health and education?
Satyagraha,
RCL
Something is seriously suspect about Saudi Arabia spending more than France and slightly less than Russia. Saudi Arabia’s population is about 1/5th that of Russia, and Russia is supposed to be some sort of expansionist military power. The 3 most imperialistic Western countries are the US, France and the UK, and Saudi Arabia manages to spend more militarily than 2 of them, without having any military bases in foreign soil AFAIK.
The U.S. governments catering to the 0.1% will be our ultimate downfall. I wonder when this obsession with the military industrial complex will end and we can finally improve our public education and health care. We rank low on international rankings of simple academic fundamentals when it comes to math and science. We are one of the most obese countries in the world. I could go on and on…If we as a society wake up then maybe we can get to the starting line of change, but until then we are stuck in this perpetual cycle of working for corporate interests.
True strength has the following attributes, among some: a sound economic well-being; sound democratic foundations and practices; a sound security apparatus, and a sound military. Moral leadership goes a long way helping too but the US has long lost its moral leadership in the world, although it pretends that it still wields influence. Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo; the Snowden exposures; ongoing torturers of its own citizens at home and more, delivered the last nail on the coffin with regards to moral leadership. The Chinese reportedly laughed, literally, when the US President tried lecturing them on the virtues of abstaining from spying. To entertain that any nation that was spied upon is ever going to comply with directives to not engage in the activity, is living in a pipe dream.
Some economists argue that on the economic front, the US no longer holds the numero uno spot either. This economy is a mutant, no longer sustained by a healthy dynamism of an aggregate participation of its citizens in a free market, but at the hands of the 1%, who can tweak it at will to be in any state of health they so wish it to be.
African nations are decidedly moving away from the US, after being burdened for so long by IMF and World Bank austerity programs that strangulated their growth as nations and which, unlike Greece, they were too weak, too corrupt and too timid to challenge. Ghana now has more than 70% of its trade with China. Ethiopia’s capital, Addis Ababa, is now a modern city, thanks to China. And South Africa is a member of BRICS. These are just a few…But who cares about Africans anyway right? All they have is natural resources which we shall never need and do not need to survive…
And back in what we used to derisively call our “back yard”, South and Central America are telling Iran and Russia, to come do business with them. Some offered Snowden asylum, except he can’t fly. Brazil has gone BRICS. And the Middle East? Well, what Middle East? What is not ashes and rubble already there, is in flames as I type this…
And on civil liberties, well…do you really need me to comment on that one? So what is left? Military power. All that is left to wield in the place of everything that is slowly but surely slipping away. It is now the answer to everything and a panacea to all problems. Domestic and foreign. The US is no longer a super power, but a military power that has no rival.
The enemy is EVERYONE in the world when we learn that even Ferguson protestors on US soil, were referred to as “Enermy forces”. Who knows what the patrons of this website are called? Yes, you. The US now rules by the sword. And lives by the sword. And may in the end succumb not to a foreign sword, but to a sword of its very own.
They may torture me but they can’t torture the truth into a lie. So, let the US military grow, until there is one multi-megawatt laser device and one nuclear weapon for every US citizen…while young soldiers kill themselves at the rate of 24 a day…with no one skipping a heat beat, as if they were expendables to be forgotten. May their mothers’ and fathers’ bleeding hearts heal with time for their loved ones.
It’s interesting to re-read Eisenhower on this topic. It’s not just the reliable “military-industrial complex” speech, though that’s useful as well. But there’s also this, his “Cross of Iron” (or, “Chance for Peace”) speech of April 1953:
Thought provoking. And still very relevant. Thank you. I learn something new each day.
….and then he went back to the Oval Office and signed the requisition for a new destroyer.
It was always a complex issue.
So the US govt. is presumably paying the contractors billions to develop and build all these weapons and then legislating to allow those same contractors to turn around and sell those weapons to the likes of Saudi Arabia, meaning that we, the taxpayers, are paying through the nose for all these weapons and getting basically nothing in return because all profit is going to the contractors and the contractors probably aren’t even having to return any of that money to the taxpayers because they aren’t actually having to pay any taxes on those profits. Is that about right?
Public costs, private profits.
Dysfunctional for us; highly functional for the 1%.
It’s the price we pay for our apathy and passivity.
~~~
“Numbering among the victims of imperialism are the common people of the imperial nation itself, those who pay the costs of empire with their blood and taxes. The empire feeds off the republic. The populace does without essentials so that the patricians can pursue their far-off plunder. The center is bled so that the perimeter can continue to expand. –Michael Parenti, The Face of Imperialism
Where is Israel?
Good question.
Interesting. You could argue that the US is spending too little. If your intent is total global domination, there probably isn’t any level of spending that will suffice.
Washington wants to be the Dominant Power in Europe, Africa, Asia, The Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia, The Middle East, North America, Central America, Latin America as well as the Pacific, the Atlantic, and Indian Oceans.
That costs a lot.
What the US is spending money on is military weaponry, which has a way of becoming obsolete, and when they’ve been shot up or rusted, what have you got, other than scrap metal? Meantime, China is putting its money into other things, infrastructure, capital investment and this New Silk Road which may very well mean dominion in Eurasia.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/12/chinas-new-silk-road-europe-will-leave-america-behind
They’ve gone from steam locomotives to maglev in a generation, and the US seems to lead in potholes and falling bridges, on which it does not spend. Doesn’t augur well for US domination.
They had a maglev at Walt Disney World in the 70s,it took you on a ride through an ghostly exhibit,though slow,it was cool.It’s been removed for premodernity.
Japan just showed off its new maglev.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32391020
The funny?part is we haven’t won a war since the big one,(where the Soviets actually won,in Europe).And noone is going to the celebration of the Red Army in Moscow,As a Russian commenter mentioned,Europe would still be going “heil”,if not for the SU.
You left out Antarctica and the Arctic Ocean,and the universe.
More on what the rest of the world is spending.
http://www.juancole.com/2015/04/pakistan-chinas-failure.html
Ukraine & Israel had wars in 2014, how much did they spend? or did the US just give them the weapons?
US foreign military aid to Israel runs at $3 billion a year, or $30 billion for the next ten years. (Haaretz says elsewhere that the cumulative total of aid so far is $100 billion). Here’s a Congressional Research Service report.
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf
The US also keeps an “emergency” munitions stockpile in Israel as well, which they can dip into if they need it before we do. And they probably did during the last unpleasantness in Gaza. That’s one way to rotate inventory.
Be Afraid – – Be Very Afraid… 57% of every tax dollar is to support WAR …. Are You Soft On Defense?? or just soft in the head.
The TERRORIST STATE is the U.S.A. – a war of terror using “drone attacks”. Look at how much inflation is eating your food dollar – – look at the
new costs to public transportation. The P.A.T.H. ( port authority trans Hudson) is raising the Bayonne Bridge to get larger ships of imported garbage…
Pay for the people is stagnant . . but WE are still supporting WALL STREET (bond purchases) but where are the bank loans??
Foreclosures – cuts to food stamps – another attempt to cut Social Security….. benefit cuts all around except “NO” tax cuts for the wealthy
TRAITORS OF WASHINGTON – – reelected. again and again
“TRAITORS OF WASHINGTON – – reelected. again and again”
Not elected….selected by the International Central Banking Cartel…those 0.01% of the elite banking class of exceptionally gifted and “chosen” self-designated rulers of humanity on Earth.
Isn’t this weapons spending just another aspect of a fascist (corporatist) government?
‘Others’ has me worried. Its 20% of the world’s military spending is more than China and Russia combined, and I’d never even heard of that country before. If those three countries were to form an alliance, their combined military expenditure would exceed the United States.
So the US must significantly increase military spending if it wants to maintain a dominant position, but it’s unclear right now if China will lend it the money to do so. The US national debt has reached such a level that other countries are becoming reluctant to buy treasury bills. So it’s doubly important to increase military spending, since a strong military is a key component of persuading other countries to lend the US money to increase military spending.
>”‘Others’ has me worried.”
If every instinct you have is wrong, then the opposite has to be right … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RerJWv5vwxc
My first post using my smart(ass) phone. Probably the last one too. Pain in the ass. As all the issues become increasingly and painfully apparent, I’m sorry to admit a creeping resignation is gaining ground. There’s a battle going on
between saying we deserve what we get and saying wake up people. The problem is I don’t know how to unknow something and knowing requires doing something about the insane course we’re on, or at least try, quixotic though that effort may be. So, wake up, and speak up, people.
US military spending is probably even higher than SIPRI indicates. Once you factor in veterans’ benefits and interest on the national debt, plus other war-related spending, total US military spending comes to about $1.3 trillion (more than double the SIPRI estimate): https://www.warresisters.org/sites/default/files/FY2016piechart_color-B.pdf
Thanks. Short, sweet and to the point (just like me).
Military “spending” is through the roof but we’re not fighting any real wars.
This “spending” is just politicians and armchair generals funneling money to some corporations which will reward them ludicrous consulting fees after they retire.
Legal? Maybe. Corrupt? Definitely.
Considering that the US has the greatest military reach of any country on the planet, it’s not surprising that this capability costs a lot of money. But we really should implement a rectification of names. The Department of Defense used to be called the Department of War, and that’s what it is. Don’t know why people are squeamish about that, unless they think that advertising works. We haven’t fought a defensive war since 1945, but offensive wars are still correctly called wars, and that’s what we do these days.
At what point is it called U.S. “offense” expenditures? It’s been a very long time since its vast majority was for defending OUR country.
That whole world domination thing is pretty damned offensive, too.
Note on the photo caption, the jet in the center is an F/A-18.
Good catch! I knew I couldn’t trust Greenwald with these stolen documents.
Yes, very suspicious how that same misleading caption somehow absolves them…