(This post is from our new blog: Unofficial Sources.)
There is no sign of an end to the erosion of Constitutional liberties that began under George W. Bush after the 9/11 attacks and continues under Barack Obama, a group of seven national security whistleblowers said Monday.
“The government chose in great secrecy to unchain itself,” said Thomas Drake, who was working at the National Security Agency in 2001 and said he saw lawlessness spread under the name of “exigent conditions” during the Bush presidency.
Then, as part of Obama’s war on whistleblowers, prosecutors charged Drake under the Espionage Act – a law intended to brutally punish spies – for talking to a reporter. After a four-year long ordeal that the federal judge in his case called “unconscionable,” all 10 felony charges against Drake were dropped in return for his guilty plea to a single misdemeanor.
Now, Drake said, he is throwing his weight behind H.R. 1466, the Surveillance State Repeal Act.
The bill would completely repeal the 2001 PATRIOT Act (which the NSA cites as the legal basis for its bulk phone metadata collection), repeal the FISA Amendments Act (which ostensibly legitimizes Internet spying) and otherwise protect people’s privacy.
It’s a bipartisan but dark-horse legislative gambit that Reps. Mark Pocan, D-Wisc., and Thomas Massie, R-Ky., have thrown into the mix as Congress debates over the next few weeks what to do before three key provisions of the PATRIOT Act expire — including the one used for bulk metadata.
All seven whistleblowers on the panel sponsored by the pro-accountability group ExposeFacts.org – including Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg, NSA whistleblowers William Binney and J. Kirk Wiebe, and former FBI agent Coleen Rowley – said they backed the bill.
Other legislative proposals, coming nearly two years after former NSA contractor Edward Snowden informed the world about the extent of NSA surveillance, call for considerably more minor reforms – if any at all.
Wiebe said he is increasingly frightened that the country is not “going to be able to get out of this mess.”
“We’ve become a society wiling to look the other way in the face of wrongdoing,” he said.
Ellsberg called Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning “heroes.” “We need more Snowdens, we need more Chelsea Mannings,” he said. Had there been some earlier, he said, “there would not have been an Iraq war. That would have been a very great service to the United States and the world.”
Ellsberg contrasted his two heroes with former vice president Dick Cheney.
“I’m not saying he’s a traitor,” Ellsberg said. Cheney truly wanted the best for his country, it’s just that “he believed that the best for his country was not the Constitution as written,” Ellsberg said.
Rowley said she was taken aback when she heard Obama, in remarks last week about the drone strike that killed two Western hostages in Pakistan, say that “one of the things that sets America apart from many other nations, one of the things that makes us exceptional is our willingness to confront squarely our imperfections and to learn from our mistakes.”
Said Rowley: “I wish that were true.”
Photo of (left to right) Kirk Wiebe, Coleen Rowley, Raymond McGovern, Daniel Ellsberg, William Binney, Jesselyn Radack, and Thomas Drake by Kathleen McClellan (@McClellanKM) via Twitter


All 1.18 hrs of conference now watchable & eminently worthwhile @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SV3618tLAE
A truly excellent article!
Hi Dan and others:
Back in 2011, Ray McGovern, a former CIA analyst (1963-1990) and NIE chair and briefer of the PDB, spoke to Paul Jay of the Real News Network about the imposition of martial law. At the time they were speaking hypothetically about an illegal attack by US-Israel on Iran, and there are massive casualties of US soldiers, and then there’s public outrage by Americans and family members of active-duty soldiers against US policy…
excerpt:
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=8394
see also:
Posse Comitatus, Ferguson, Missouri, and Racialized Military Policing
http://www.paulstreet.org/?p=1256
See
Thousands of national guard troops occupy Baltimore, Maryland
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/04/29/balt-a29.html
And
http://globalnews.ca/video/1964695/maryland-national-guard-adjutant-advises-baltimore-residents-to-take-cover-for-the-night
I wonder if that would have effect on ns letters.
I might have one.
I have gotten in trouble with the ann edwards gicoma matiasevich etc…
Not do they import cocaine but they are also pethofiles.
Ann edwards brother robert edward is a child toucher, he touched corina edwards, as i heard her talking with a freind of hers last name foster.
Besides the fact that the children where send to children of god cult. Flirty fishing.
However there is a video on youtube acc stephen brock 11 videos.
The video corina 0-13 is a part of a audiotape that i got on my perps.
Corina edwards is talking with her aunt Lindsey? and her boyfreind.
On an other tape that got destroyed by somebody else, a good guy told me that i was stalked by an jeffry and lindsay. And that they lived on rhe other side of the hill.
Sandia mountans is the hill im talking about in new mexico.
Anyways on my google search came a jeffry johnson who works in the jurisdictional system.
I was wondering of a couple things.
Most reasonable persons likely agree that H. R. 1466, if passed, would swing the pendulum back to the sensible mean. But I am concerned about a 2006 Senate Ammendment S. 494 that, while extending protections to whistleblowers, managed to take back what it gave by denying same to “…workers at the FBI, the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Imagery and Mapping Agency, and the National Security Agency…” Pls see:
http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2006/06/23/senate-approves-whistleblower-rights-breakthrough/
If the Defense Bill of 2006 in which the Amendment was buried passed, does the text of H. R. 1466 ( I have not read it yet) effectively nullify Amendment S. 494? Because if it does not, there will still be no protections for workers of these agencies…
BTW, if you read this, and if you are a member of the above-mentioned agencies, and know something about criminal activities regarding remote tortures of thousands of innocent Americans across the country, pls follow the submission recommendations to the Intercept team. Protecting the nation from enemies within as well, is part of the oath. And thank you in advance.
People were reportng besides Snowden & Manning before 9-’11-2001we were shut down. and still are.
The Era of Absolute Privacy is coming! No need in cookies or browsing history anymore.
I discovered and patented how to structure any data: Language has its own Internal parsing, indexing and statistics. For instance, there are two sentences:
a) ‘Fire!’
b) ‘Dismay and anguish were depicted on every countenance; the males turned pale, and the females fainted; Mr. Snodgrass and Mr. Winkle grasped each other by the hand, and gazed at the spot where their leader had gone down, with frenzied eagerness; while Mr. Tupman, by way of rendering the promptest assistance, and at the same time conveying to any persons who might be within hearing, the clearest possible notion of the catastrophe, ran off across the country at his utmost speed, screaming ‘Fire!’ with all his might.’
Evidently, that the phrase ‘Fire!’ has different importance into both sentences, in regard to extra information in both. This distinction is reflected as the phrase weights: the first has 1, the second – 0.02; the greater weight signifies stronger emotional ‘acuteness’.
First you need to parse obtaining phrases from clauses, for sentences and paragraphs.
Next, you calculate Internal statistics, weights; where the weight refers to the frequency that a phrase occurs in relation to other phrases.
After that data is indexed by common dictionary, like Webster, and annotated by subtexts.
This is a small sample of the structured data:
this – signify – : 333333
both – are – once : 333333
confusion – signify – : 333321
speaking – done – once : 333112
speaking – was – both : 333109
place – is – in : 250000
To see the validity of technology – pick up any sentence.
Do you have a pencil?
All other technologies depend on spying, on quires, on SQL, all of them. See IBM, Oracle, Microsoft, Google and Yahoo? Apache Hadoop and NoSQL?
Being structured information will search for users based on their profiles of structured data. Each and every user can get only specifically tailored for him information: there is no any privacy issue, nobody ever will know what the user got and read.
My technology exploits the Laws of Nature, which determine the inner construction of all Languages: I came from Analytic Philosophy, from Internal Relations Theory.
H.R. 1466? Call it CONSTITUTION ACT and I start to believe in the willingness of America to be less exeptional ;-D
In case we didn’t know the meaning of ‘exceptional’…
Thanks for the description of the photo you included at the bottom of the paragraph.
If it weren’t for that helpful description, I would not have known what this was a photo of.
Other Intercept articles should be as diligent as this one about clearly labeling photos.
With all due respect, I assume you haven’t been following events surrounding the insidious NSA debacle very long have you? Most people who have, know every single one of these peoples faces ..and their contributions to exposing the illegal NSA’s activities and the criminals who help cover it up. Moreover, there are lots of other people helping in this battle to reign in the NSA/CIA. One notable person who post daily analysis of related documents and stories, is Marcy Wheeler..aka ..emptywheel. If you really want to get to the heart of this debacle, read her blog daily here: https://www.emptywheel.net/
Thanks for the link, chronicle. Bookmarked.
Excellent Mr. Froomkin.
Full text and tracking of HR 1466 available from this link: https://www.govtrack.us/events/track-something?feed=billsearch:text=HR1466
This will work and I will certainly pressure my congressional representatives to support it (no real hope of that though).
Meanwhile…HR 1466 it will take time to get through the committees and there is no way that it will happen before 1 Jun 2015 when Section 215 will expire without further authorization. This expiration is a small….but absolutely critical step in the fight to regain rights granted UP of Amendment IV of the U.S. Constitution.
From ACLU petition posted on link to follow:
The law that that the NSA uses to collect the phone records of every single American, Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act, will expire on June 1 — unless Congress acts to extend it.”
Let the sun go down on Section 215.
It only takes a minute to sign the petition.
No phone call required.
https://action.aclu.org/secure/stopnsa?ms=web_150408_privacyandtechnology_surveilla…
Just signed. Less than 8,000 signatures needed to reach the magic number of 80,000. Why that number is significant is a mystery to me. I have noticed when signing petitions offered by organizations that invariably my congressperson replies, unlike when I write them on my own volition, which must get lost somewhere in the digital vacuum.
Yep. Organizations like ACLU have legal clout and keep records that can jump out to prove that one did in fact, respectfully contact his/her congressional representative regarding any given matter. I long ago quit using my private right to free speech, as the State where I presently reside is exclusively party controlled and not only do citizen’s opinions not matter to those State congressional representatives; but any expressed dissension or disagreement with the controllers (monied interests) of that party platform; could possibly get you specifically targeted as well.
But IMHO some issues, like this one, are worth the risk.
At the present historical junction; not speaking up regarding this issue is irresponsible and possibly suicidal when viewed in the larger societal pictorial context.
Thanks for signing jgreen7801.
I long ago quit using my private right to free speech, as the…where I presently reside is exclusively party controlled and not only do citizen’s opinions not matter to those…representatives; but any expressed dissension or disagreement with the controllers (monied interests) of that party platform; could possibly get you specifically targeted as well. – Lyra
Well said, and all too often it’s rule, rather than the exception. In my case, the local newspapers/radio stations are bastions of hell as well.
The only free speech phrase allowed within 20,000 square miles of me (literally, and I’m likely being ‘conservative here ;) that will not have negative consequences for employment, etc… is “I’ll pray for you.”
It’s like being surrounded by the walking brain-dead.
No problem. Thanks for linking.
Signed it!
Now I’m going to continue with my Intercept fix……
I wish them all the very best. If some kind of video discussion with these people could be made and put on The Intercept, the subject might get more play.
There’s the existing mass surveillance, and there’s the expansion of mass surveillance. I sincerely wish them good luck with their bill, but I’m lucid : they would need a miracle to push the provision through. The Snowden revelations came as a bomb to some. That bomb was probably not powerful enough, however, to blow up the entire system. But if it can’t at least contain the expansion of mass surveillance, I don’t get it… A few months ago, Google anounced it was dropping Google Glass. Now, it appears the firm, as well as several competitors, are working on an alternate version. The Orwellian nightmare would be complete should that omniscient mass surveillance tool hit the stores. And I don’t understand why TI is so quiet about it…
ANY time the cancellation of a surveillance program is announced, there is ALWAYS a replacement in place that is more far-reaching than the program was cancelled. And, alas, the spy agencies announce cancellations of their embattled and controversial programs all the time. If I read any more good news I might just scream.
If the occasional Google Glass drone walking past seems Orwellian, imagine the sorry position of idiots who buy “home security systems”. It’s amazing how many people buy their way right into 1984. Aaron Hernandez, for example – no physical evidence, but the Orwellian eye saw him carrying a “dark object” into his house, and that’s all the prosecutors needed to hear before setting up a circumstantial case. http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/04/15/hernandez-jurors-deliberate-for-seventh-day/QUaFD2uTTYn65GsKTEY26O/story.html (I don’t know if he’s guilty or not … does anyone?)
Speaking of which, home security systems are yet another thing we have yet to hear one peep about out of the Snowden files.
Thanks for the comment, Wnt. I have been watching the commercials for these security systems, thinking the exact same thing. Not only are these people willingly letting others spy on them, they’re paying them to do it. The gu…gu…guillibility of some people surpasseth all understanding.
There is some bi-partisan support for this measure(9 Dems-2 Reps). While I hold little hope in a legislative fix, I’ll use any available avenue .
quote”. It’s amazing how many people buy their way right into 1984.”unquote
Not really. Considering the US is the dumbest country on the planet. I mean, wait till the “internet of things” becomes ubiquitous. Orwell would pass out from shock. Murika doesn’t have a fucking clue.
wait till the “internet of things” becomes ubiquitous… – chronicle
Another ‘market driven solution’ searching for a problem to fix. Oh, yeah. It’s a ‘job’…errr…’income-creator’. Humans are</em the dumbest species, aren't they? Always the easy way; never the most beneficial way.
Sillyputty, it’s all about the service industry jobs. And the protect and service industry jobs too.
People are dead set on destroying people… subsconsciously believing they and their people will be the exception to said destruction.
I am so grateful to these individuals who continue to fight to save the Constitution’s liberties on behalf of all Americans. Thank you to you all.