ON THE EVENING of May 7, 2007, 48-year-old Lata Duka was doing dishes in the kitchen of her home in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, when she heard a loud bang come from the front of the house. “It wasn’t a normal sound. I was very scared,” Lata recalls nearly a decade later.
Thinking someone was breaking in, Lata grabbed a chair from the kitchen table and hoisted it above her head, waiting for the intruder. Moments later a swarm of armed men burst through the front door and ran into her kitchen. “Put the chair down or I’ll shoot!” she says one exclaimed, pushing his gun against her chest.
The armed men were FBI agents and other law enforcement officials. As they searched the house, one of the men approached Lata. He was smiling.
“He kept asking me, where are my sons!” Lata remembers. “Just smiling and going up and down the stairs, asking me all the time, where are your sons? I told him my sons were at work. He just kept smiling at me.”
Lata didn’t know that at roughly the same time, authorities were conducting raids at separate locations in Cherry Hill to arrest her three sons, Dritan, Shain and Eljvir Duka. Over 100 officers and agents were involved in what at the time was one of the most high-profile counterterrorism arrests in the post-9/11 era.
U.S. Attorney Chris Christie speaks with the media outside Camden Federal Courthouse on May 8, 2007 in Camden, New Jersey. (Thomas Cain/Getty)
The next morning, Chris Christie, then the U.S. attorney for New Jersey, appeared at a press conference flanked by law enforcement officials to announce the arrests. “The philosophy that supports and encourages jihad around the world against Americans came to live here in New Jersey and threatened the lives of our citizens through these defendants,” he said.
Christie said that five men apprehended the previous night — the three Duka brothers along with two friends, Mohamad Shnewer and Serdar Tatar — had been planning to launch a terrorist attack against the nearby Fort Dix military base. “Fortunately, law enforcement in New Jersey was here to stop them,” he said.
The press conference and ensuing case garnered national attention, and the brothers and their friends quickly became known as the “Fort Dix Five,” characterized in the media as a terrorist cell that intended to kill servicemen and attack facilities at the base. For Christie, now a possible contender for the GOP 2016 presidential nomination, the arrests would be a career turning point, helping galvanize his eventual rise to governor of New Jersey.
Entrapped by Razan Ghalayini
For the Duka family, the arrests marked a tragic turn. They had escaped the turmoil of the former Yugoslavia and managed to start anew in the United States, only to find three sons publicly branded as terrorists. Dritan, Shain and Eljvir, seized when they were 28, 26 and 23, would be convicted of conspiring to kill U.S. military personnel and sentenced to life in prison, devastating the Duka family and putting an end to their nascent American dream.
Beyond the sensational headlines is the story of paid FBI informants with long criminal histories who spent a year working to befriend the brothers and enlist them as terrorists. This effort, both expensive and time-consuming, nevertheless failed to convince the Duka brothers to take part in a violent attack. Indeed, over the course of hundreds of hours of surveillance, the plot against Fort Dix was never even raised with them.
In the years since these events occurred, the use of dubious informants in terrorism investigations by the FBI has become almost routine. When purported terror plots are “revealed,” they almost invariably involve paid government informants at every level of their ideation, facilitation and planning. But the story of the Duka brothers is an early example of this type of case — and it still stands out because of the deliberate and brazen way the brothers were entrapped by authorities, assisted by their paid informants. Indeed, one might argue that the targeting of the Dukas was the prototype for the program of state-orchestrated terrorism plots that continues today.
IN THE 1980s, Yugoslavia was in its final chaotic decade of existence. Lata Duka and her husband, Firik, both ethnic Albanian Muslims, decided to leave their small village of Spas in search of a better life for their three young boys.
The Dukas traveled by train across Europe to a refugee camp in Latina, Italy, where they stayed for a year. From there, they boarded a plane to Mexico City and made their way to the Rio Grande, which they crossed by canoe into Texas. Once across the border, the family spent 12 hours in the back of a pickup truck to Dallas, before finally heading east toward their final destination: the Bensonhurst neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York.
None of the Dukas spoke English at the time, and they had entered the country without legal documents. Firik found a job stocking shelves at a Korean-owned fruit stand, where he was paid $175 a week. He made flashcards to learn the names of the produce he was handling, and at night, he would come home and teach his wife the words he had learned. “Our way of life was to just take care of our families, just live simply, and teach the children how to work hard,” Firik says.
Life in Brooklyn wasn’t easy, and the Duka family was only getting bigger. Lata and Firik had two more children: a girl named Naze and a boy named Burim. When their oldest child, Dritan, or Tony as he’d come to be called, turned six, they sent him to public school. Because he could barely speak English, he fell behind the other kids. When Lata got notes from his teachers, she couldn’t read them.
Bensonhurst was known, in Brooklyn and beyond, as a home for ethnic mafias. “Growing up, the Russians would be with the Russians, Italians with the Italians, and the Albanians with the Albanians,” remembers Burim, the youngest of the four brothers. “The Albanians never started nothing, but sometimes, if someone came to us, we had to fight.” It wasn’t unusual for the boys to come home with a black eye or a bleeding lip. In time, they adapted to the street life of their neighborhood, developing thick Brooklyn accents and a swagger to match.
Tony, who had a temper, frequently got into fights at school. He knew he was heading down a bad path and dropped out during his freshman year, telling his father, “If I don’t, I’m either going to end up in jail or dead.” Reluctantly, Firik got his son a job at a wholesale food distributor, where he was driving delivery trucks.Though he stopped attending classes, Tony continued to pick up his brother Shain from high school, where he eventually met a student named Jennifer Marino. The two fell in love, began dating, and a year later were engaged. Jennifer moved into the Duka family’s small apartment.
Like their older brother, Shain and Eljvir also dropped out of school to work, and spent more time hanging out on the streets. At various points, the three brothers were arrested on charges of disorderly conduct and marijuana possession.
Firik and Lata grew increasingly frustrated; they hadn’t moved their family halfway across the world to have them give up their education and get caught up in petty crime. They were at a loss for what to do, and overwhelmed by the challenges of life as immigrants in America. In an effort to keep their sons out of trouble, Firik moved the family out of Brooklyn to a two-bedroom apartment in suburban Cherry Hill, New Jersey. Tony, Jennifer and their newborn baby girl, Lejla, took one room, while Firik and Lata took the other. Shain, Eljvir, Naze and Burim all slept in the living room.
One day after leaving work, Shain and his girlfriend got into a car accident. While their injuries were minor, the experience shook Shain. “I realized that if I had died then I would have gone to hell,” Shain says of the experience, writing to The Intercept from a federal prison in Kentucky, where he’s currently incarcerated. “The accident made me realize that death can come at any moment so I better try and get right.”
Over the course of the next year, Shain began to take his Muslim identity more seriously. He stopped drinking and smoking pot, and says these changes in behavior opened up conversations about religion among the brothers. “I started to read the Quran a bit, and pray every now and then. It was a struggle because I didn’t want to be fake,” Shain says. “When I do something, I don’t want to be hypocritical. Over here praying and fasting, then over here in a nightclub smoking weed with a bunch of girls partying. No, I would try and do it wholeheartedly.”
Lata and Firik, both practicing Muslims, were overjoyed by this change. “I had tears in my eyes when they were telling me they would start praying,” says Lata. As the tumult of their early years passed, the brothers began to settle into lives revolving around family and work, pooling their money to open a restaurant, which they named Dukas Pizza. They also became more religious. Their understanding of Islam was elementary and largely self-taught, and for the first time, they began attending mosque services on Fridays, praying five times a day and growing out their beards. They incorporated Islamic phrases into their everyday lives, greeting each other with “Salaam alaikum,” or “Peace be upon you.”As the Dukas were changing, the United States was about to change, too. On September 11, 2001, hijacked planes crashed into the Word Trade Center towers and the Pentagon. “When it happened, I was driving to a job in Jersey. My kids called me from home and told me something had happened,” Firik says. “I used to deliver food in those buildings, and I would take Shain along with me. When he was a child, the Twin Towers were his favorite buildings in the city. We couldn’t believe this was happening.”
In the aftermath of the attacks, the national mood turned. The Dukas, like many others, were opposed to the subsequent wars launched by the Bush administration in Iraq and Afghanistan. In their view, the U.S. was waging an unfounded attack on two countries that had nothing to do with 9/11. “I was frustrated and against the wars. I believed the wars were unjust and wrong,” Shain wrote from prison. “They killed so many innocent people.”
The Dukas also began to grow increasingly disenchanted with the widespread mistreatment of Muslims. In Europe, the 2004 Madrid train bombing, believed to be carried out by an al Qaeda-inspired terror cell, was followed the next year by a series of attacks in London. Public officials in Europe and the U.S. began to warn of the threat posed by young Muslim men. “America was turning into a spy state, it used 9/11 as a stepping stone to justify this,” Shain says. “Not everyone was affected, so not everyone cared, but Muslim people felt it.”
Yet the Duka family continued to thrive. Firik had started his own roofing business, which the brothers decided to focus on full time, selling their pizzeria. By the end of 2005, the company employed a growing staff and the future seemed bright. The boys decided to do something they had done many times before as a family: take a vacation.
In January 2006, the Duka brothers and a group of friends, including Mohamad Shnewer, Eljvir Duka’s former schoolmate and future brother-in-law, took a trip to a cabin in the Poconos Mountains in Northern Pennsylvania. There, they did what any group of young men might do on vacation: they went skiing, played paintball in the woods, rode horses at the stables and went to the shooting range.Tony brought his video camera to record his brothers and friends. After the trip, Burim and Shain took the tape from Tony’s camera to a Circuit City near their home in Cherry Hill. They wanted to make copies of the video to give to everyone who went on the trip.
The Circuit City clerk processing the videotape saw a group of young bearded men in the woods, skiing, shooting guns and riding horses. The Dukas, whose daily speech was often punctuated with Arabic phrases, could occasionally be heard saying “Allahu Akbar” on and off camera. While in earlier years a group of young Muslim men at the shooting range may not have aroused the panic of employees, in the heightened paranoia after 9/11, it was enough to trigger alarm.
The employee called the police and reported the tape.
Mahmoud Omar screen grab from FBI surveillance videos. (NJ court)
THE FOOTAGE REVEALED no evidence of a crime, but the Circuit City employee’s call to the police set in motion a series of events that would soon link the Dukas and their friends to Mahmoud Omar, a 36-year-old Egyptian immigrant who was also an FBI confidential informant.
In the 1970s, when the Senate was investigating the FBI’s notorious COINTELPRO domestic counterintelligence operations, the agency employed around 1,500 confidential informants. Today, that number has ballooned to 15,000 confidential informants. Many of these individuals have long-documented criminal histories or problems with their immigration status, and their entanglement with the law is exploited to coax them into helping generate criminal cases against people who have yet to commit concrete acts.
In 2006, the FBI approached Omar, who also lived in Cherry Hill. He had moved to the U.S. in the 1990s and made a living exporting cars to Egypt; in some cases, they had been reported stolen. Convictions for fraud littered his record. “They showed me a photograph and asked me who it was in the picture,” he told The Intercept by phone. “The FBI don’t come and ask you if you know someone if they don’t already know the answer.”
The man in the photograph was Mohamad Shnewer, Eljvir Duka’s friend and future brother-in-law. Omar knew Shnewer in passing from shopping at the Shnewer family’s halal grocery store. The FBI told Omar they needed to know what Shnewer and his friends were up to and asked Omar to become an informant. He agreed.
Shnewer was a taxi driver in his early 20s whose sister was engaged to Eljivir. The Duka brothers, who describe Shnewer as immature, seemed to be his only friends. They were older and had the cachet of being tough guys from Brooklyn. Shnewer was always trying to impress them, Burim remembers. “One time, he told us that a passenger in his taxi refused to pay the fare, so he got out of the car and hit him across the head with a baseball bat,” he says.Burim believes that story, like many of the others Shnewer would tell, was a lie.
Omar began coming to the grocery store with increasing frequency to befriend Shnewer. For Shnewer, the older man quickly became a mentor and a confidant. As their relationship developed, they began to discuss politics, religion and the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
While it’s unclear how the conversations began, it’s apparent from the FBI’s recordings with the informant that Shnewer was receptive to the idea of violence. Shnewer told Omar that that he spent time on the Internet watching graphic combat footage from Iraq.
The informant encouraged his new young protégé, suggesting that Shnewer move beyond listening and talking; it was time to “do something,” Omar said, and the two began floating ideas of what that “something” might be. In August 2006, Omar and Shnewer began discussing the idea of launching an armed attack against Fort Dix military base, close to Trenton, New Jersey.
But only Omar and Shnewer were formulating plans for an attack. In a conversation recorded on August 2, 2006, Omar pressed Shnewer to come up with other recruits for their plot. “You and I are not enough, and you had told me that maybe there could be other people,” Omar said. “Otherwise, we can’t do anything.”
“No, no, no when I tell you I have people, that means I have people,” Shnewer responded. “Listen I will not talk to anyone about matters like these unless I trust them.”
In the same conversation, Shnewer brought up Serdar Tatar, also a close friend of the Dukas, whose father owned a pizzeria near the Fort Dix base. Tartar dreamed of becoming a police officer, and Shnewer knew this, according to the Burim and his parents. Nonetheless, Shnewer offered Tatar up as a possible co-conspirator, mentioning a map of Fort Dix he’d used to deliver pizza from his father’s shop to the base.
Mohamad Shnewer: You know Serdar? Who has the pizzeria close to here?
Mahmoud Omar: So, what are your thoughts about him?
Mohamad Shnewer: He is ready…. he has a map…. he used to deliver there.
Mahmoud Omar: Ready to be killed?
Mohamad Shnewer: Yes!
Two days later, Omar asked Shnewer again about possible conspirators for the attack.
“So who do you have in mind?” Omar asked.
Shnewer replied: “I have Tony, Eljvir and Shain in mind.”
IN U.S. CRIMINAL LAW, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future. It is an agreement to break the law; it doesn’t have to be a plan. Once two individuals enter into an agreement, the crime is complete, though some statutes require evidence that concrete steps have been taken. But an individual cannot enter into a conspiracy with a government informant. So unless Shnewer could convince the others to join the plan to attack Fort Dix, there would be no criminal conspiracy.
Omar apparently felt more comfortable approaching Tatar than the Duka brothers and began courting the 23-year-old. He told him of the plot to attack Fort Dix and openly asked for his help: he needed the pizza delivery map.
Tatar, who had since left his father’s pizza shop and moved to Philadelphia, was working at a 7-Eleven when Sgt. Dean Dandridge of the Philadelphia Police Department came by for his daily coffee. On November 15, 2006, Tatar told Dandridge that he believed Omar might be planning a terrorist attack. Neither Tatar, nor Dandridge, had any way of knowing that Omar was an informant.
Dandridge left Tatar’s information with the FBI, expecting the bureau’s agents would be in touch soon. For three weeks, Tatar waited for the FBI to contact him. In the meantime, he recorded at least one conversation with Omar, so that when the authorities did reach out, he would have information to give them. Eventually and inexplicably, after repeated prodding, Tatar gave Omar the map of Fort Dix.
When a Philadelphia police detective assigned to the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force spoke to Tatar, he downplayed the threat and refused the audio that Tatar had recorded. The agent asked Tatar if he had indeed given Omar the map. Suddenly scared, Tatar lied. That lie would later implicate him in the conspiracy.
Having succeeded in this haphazard way of ensnaring Tatar, Omar relentlessly tried to persuade Shnewer to set up a meeting with the Duka brothers to discuss “the plot.” But the meeting never seemed to materialize. Time and again, Shnewer found excuses to explain why this didn’t happen. For example, on September 14, 2006, Shnewer, after much hesitation, told Omar that Shain knew about the plot, but not of Omar’s involvement.
As months passed, Shnewer tried to assure an increasingly skeptical Omar that the Duka brothers were on board with the developing plans. When Shnewer failed to provide proof of their actual involvement, Omar pressed harder, asking Shnewer to pursue the brothers, and Eljvir Duka in particular. Between August 11 and September 19, 2006, Omar asked Shnewer about Eljvir 197 times.
Finally, after months of failed efforts, Omar told his FBI handlers that, in his estimation, Tony and Shain Duka knew nothing about the plot and seemed to be more focused on taking care of their families.
“I’m saying it again, those Dukas, they didn’t tell me nothing,” he said in a recent phone call with The Intercept. When asked how the FBI responded to his view of the Dukas, Omar replied: “They said it was none of my business. I just wear the wire and record.”
As Omar struggled to link the Duka brothers to the plot he’d developed with Shnewer, the FBI decided to introduce another informant into the case.
Besnik Bakalli, a 29-year-old undocumented immigrant from Albania, was sitting in a Philadelphia jail awaiting deportation when the FBI approached him about becoming an informant. Agents showed him pictures of the Duka brothers and told him to meet them at a Dunkin’ Donuts in Cherry Hill, where the Dukas often went after Friday prayers at the nearby Palmyra mosque.When the Dukas walked into the Dunkin’ Donuts on a Friday in July 2006, Besnik was talking on the phone loudly in Albanian. The naturally gregarious Dukas overheard him and introduced themselves, ultimately befriending the informant. The FBI’s plan to quietly integrate their second informant into the lives of the Duka brothers was unfolding successfully.
Over the course of the next ten months, Bakalli saw the Duka family often. Over dinner with the brothers, Lata and Firik, he portrayed himself as a down-on-his-luck fellow Albanian, recently divorced and in dire emotional and financial straits. “He told us a former friend of his tried to rape his sister,” Shain says. “He got out of prison, heard the news, and got in an altercation, which killed this individual. After this, he said his life was in jeopardy. He came to America illegally and now is in a foreign land, alone and homesick. This was Besnik’s story to the family.”
The family took pity on Bakalli and took him in as one of their own. Firik Duka, whose roofing business continued to grow, hired him to work a few shifts at job sites around New Jersey and Philadelphia. Lata even tried to help Bakalli find a wife with whom to settle down.
Bakalli told the Dukas that he wanted to become a better Muslim, and the brothers agreed to help him. “This is when all the questions began to roll in,” Shain says. “What is jihad? Do we have to perform jihad? Me and my brothers did not take these questions as out of the ordinary. At that time all you heard on TV was jihad, terrorism, Islam this, Islam that. We thought he was just new and trying to understand, no red flags were raised!”
As they had both penetrated the same group of friends, Omar and Bakalli occasionally bumped into one another. Neither knew the other was an informant. “I hated the guy — didn’t like the look of him at all,” Omar told The Intercept.
The boys trusted Omar and Bakalli. Omar bonded with the Dukas over cars, a topic the brothers obsessed over. Surveillance transcripts reveal conversations with both informants that ranged from food to family to work.
World events, particularly those that affected Muslims, also came up. The men often discussed their opposition to U.S. involvement in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, then at their peak. They talked about the perceived targeting of Muslim-Americans by law enforcement and debated what role, if any, Muslims living in the U.S. had in assisting other Muslims resisting American aggression. They often couched their discussions of these topics in religious terms.
Shnewer and Omar spent much of their time together watching jihadi videos and listening to radical lectures on tape, often playing them in the Dukas’ presence. The Dukas also watched these videos, sometimes responding positively. Tony got particularly riled up by a lecture called Constants of the Path of Jihad by Anwar el-Awlaki, a Yemeni-American who would later be killed in a U.S. drone attack. He played the audio for his brothers and Bakalli, and in what would later be characterized as evidence of his radical beliefs, was recorded saying, “This is the real truth, straight up, no holds barred!”
Yet the brothers never talked about an actual plan to commit an act of terrorism. Discussing the various forms of jihad, Eljvir asserted, on questioning from Bakalli, that the daily struggle against personal vices like greed and lust is the greatest form of jihad.
In a conversation on September 22, 2006, Omar told Eljvir that he and Shnewer had been working on a “plan,” without providing specific details. Eljvir told them they should seek out a fatwa, or an Islamic legal opinion. While the prosecution would attempt to frame this comment as Eljvir seeking religious authorization for the Fort Dix plot, Omar undermined this claim at trial, conceding under cross-examination that Eljvir was unaware of plans pertaining to Fort Dix.
In other conversations, Bakalli continually pressed the Dukas to “do something,” and shamed them for not taking some kind of action to defend Muslims. During one heated conversation with Bakalli, Tony was recorded saying that he was “going to start something,” and that “you can do a lot of damage, man, seven people.” This statement would later be held as a damning self-indictment of the brothers’ intentions, but again, it never translated into real follow-up action or planning.
Despite their best efforts, Omar’s and Bakalli’s attempts to get the Dukas to put radical ideas into action didn’t gain traction. A month after Tony’s angry statements, Bakalli tried to get him to firm up plans to “do something.” At this point, Tony essentially recanted his incendiary words:
“We can’t … we … the biggest Jihad for us here in America is to spread Islam … That’s the most important thing. That is war, believe me. That is Jihad. Jihad is not just, like we say, to go fight. No people misunderstand it. … The first Jihad is with yourself, when the devil tells you, do this, you try, you fight with the devil. No, no, no. I won’t do it. Then the second Jihad is with your family. To work. To teach Islam to your children. Then you should spread Islam in, to tell others, this is Islam.”
Bakalli pressed, but Tony held firm. “Our biggest obligation for us is our family, especially for me with children,” he said.
In early 2007, the Dukas were joined by Bakalli, Shnewer and Omar on another “boys weekend” in the Poconos. The informants were promised horseback riding, hikes in the woods, “an epic game of paintball” and a shooting range. While playing paintball with Tony, Omar likened the game to military training. “This is like an army exactly,” he said, according to court testimony.
This second Poconos weekend, now infiltrated by two government informants, came and went without any discussion of a plot against military personnel. Instead, the brothers and their friends mostly spent hours watching videos of Eddie Murphy and Dave Chappelle stand-up comedy, in between horse riding and paint-balling.
At this point, roughly a year into the case, despite hundreds of hours of surveillance and the employment of two paid informants, the Dukas still had not been induced to commit any criminal act. The stakes were raised and an illegal gun deal was set up.
Omar knew about the brothers’ enthusiasm, and he also knew that without proper immigration documents they couldn’t legally buy firearms in the U.S. It was a sore spot for the Duka brothers, all of whom had tried to apply or were in the process of applying for asylum status. In the Poconos, unlike other visitors who owned personal firearms, the Dukas had to wait in line for rentals at the shooting range.
In March 2007, Omar approached Tony with an offer: a friend in Baltimore with a gun shop was looking to make some under-the-counter sales of guns valued at the discounted price of $500 apiece. This offer was too good to pass up, and after being assured that this guy was “legit,” Tony agreed to take look at what Omar’s friend had in stock.
The boys knew the transaction wouldn’t be legal. “Being an illegal alien did prevent us from purchasing our own guns legally,” Shain says. “At the time, me and my family were in the immigration process. We even hired a lawyer, and we were going to do papers properly when that was done. We always believed that these guns could be transferred legally to my name once we received our papers.”
In a separate conversation that same month, Omar spoke with Shnewer without the Dukas present.
Mahmoud Omar: By the way, I want to ask you a question, I want you to tell me seriously. Eljvir and Tony, do they know, for example why we’re getting the handguns or … ?
Mohamad Shnewer: Yeah, of course.
Mahmoud Omar: Don’t tell me you didn’t tell them, Mohamad.
Mohamad Shnewer: Yeah, they know.
Mahmoud Omar: That we, for example, are training in anticipation for something like this in the future?
Mohamad Shnewer: Yeah!
On March 28, 2007, Omar provided Tony with a list of available weapons from his fictional Baltimore source. This list had in fact been created by the FBI. Inexplicably, in addition to AK-47s, handguns and M16 rifles, it also included heavy weapons like a rocket-propelled grenade launcher — used to destroy tanks and other armored vehicles — as well as an M-60 machine gun. Burim, who was 15 at the time, remembers Tony coming home and wondering how Omar’s guy could be “legit” if he was selling RPGs and M-60s, which are heavily regulated in the United States.
On April 6, 2007, Tony went back to Omar and told him that he was interested in the AK-47s, the M-16s and the handguns, but not the heavy weapons. In a recorded conversation, he expressed concerns:
Tony Duka: Is there something I need to know?
Mahmoud Omar: Like what?
Tony Duka: Who … that list, there was some stuff on that list that was heavy shit … the RPG …. Yeah, with rockets. That’s why if you know something I don’t know, ah, please tell me man.
Omar assured Tony that his friend in Baltimore was trustworthy.
On May 7, 2007, Tony and Shain met Omar at his apartment, which had been paid for that month by the FBI. As the brothers inspected the firearms they planned to purchase, audio recordings reveal Tony commenting, “Now we don’t have to wait in line to shoot in Poconos.”
Minutes later, police burst into the apartment and wrestled Tony, Shain and Omar to the floor. “I had no idea what was going on when it happened,” Shain wrote from prison. “I assumed we were being arrested because of the guns, which I knew we were buying from Mahmoud illegally.”
The men were put into police cars and eventually taken away to a Philadelphia detention center.
While Shain and Tony were being arrested at Omar’s apartment, Burim and Eljvir were driving home after taking Tony’s five kids to a Mister Softee for ice cream. As they pulled up to Tony’s apartment, they noticed police cruisers and SWAT vans surrounding the building. Burim got out of the car to ask an agent what was going on, and both he and his brother were handcuffed.
Eljvir was transferred to the same detention center as Shain and Tony. The teenage Burim was not arrested, but left handcuffed under a tree while officers searched Tony’s apartment. Burim recalls an armed agent telling him, “Don’t grow up to be like your brothers.” He later added, “You should think about finding yourself a new religion.”
Tony, Shain and Eljvir spent the night wondering how they were going to get out of what they assumed would be gun charges.
The next morning, the brothers, along with Tatar and Shnewer, who had been seized in separate raids, were driven in a black-tinted police van past throngs of reporters and cameramen to the federal courthouse in Camden, New Jersey.
Inside, they were presented with a criminal complaint accusing them of conspiracy to murder U.S. military personnel. “I was confused at first, but for the most part I breathed easy when I saw that,” Shain says. “I figured they mixed us up with someone else and we’d be out of here as soon as we cleared things up.”
As Shain remembers, the boys were taken to a holding cell and instructed to read through the complaint in its entirety. Shain read aloud to the group. The complaint consisted almost entirely of Mohamad Shnewer’s private conversations with Mahmoud Omar. “After reading it we all turned to Shnewer,” Shain says. “Is this really true!? You went to a military base, you said this and that!? Who the hell is Confidential Witness #1?! Mahmoud Omar was an informant? Unbelievable! We were all pissed at Shnewer.”
It became clear to the brothers that Shnewer, in his conversations with Omar, had committed them to taking part in a “plot” to attack Fort Dix without their knowledge.
The five men were charged with conspiracy to attack military personnel, as well as with weapons offenses for the guns they had attempted to purchase from Mahmoud Omar.
At a press conference announcing the indictments, U.S. Attorney Chris Christie praised law enforcement for stopping an impending threat, painting a dark portrait of the alleged plotters. “Believe me, too,” he said. “These people were ready for martyrdom. They spoke about martyrdom extensively in the tapes. They said they were to do this in the service of Allah.”
THE DUKAS WERE arrested in the spring of 2007, but not brought to court until the fall of 2008. In the interim, the brothers were held in pretrial solitary confinement at the Philadelphia Federal Detention Center. “The prison guards would ransack our cells and throw our Quran on the floor, but leave the rest of stuff alone,” Shain recalls. “We quickly realized that they were actually being serious about this.”
In opening arguments for the trial, presented in October 2008, the prosecutors’ case relied heavily on the two key informants. Omar was eventually paid $238,000 for his efforts, while Bakalli, who earned a minimum of $1,500 a week for his involvement, seems to have received additional benefits. He was facing deportation to Albania, where he had been involved in a shooting, and testified that in exchange for his cooperation with the FBI, he was allowed to remain in the U.S. The Albanian government also pardoned him.
Before proceedings commenced, New Jersey District Judge Robert B. Kugler granted a motion by prosecutors to keep the names of the jury anonymous, agreeing with the government that the trial represented an exceptional case requiring protection of the jurors’ identities.
At trial, Assistant U.S. Attorney William Fitzpatrick argued that the Duka brothers had been inspired by jihadist ideology. “Their motive was to defend Islam,” he told the jury. “Their inspiration was al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. Their intent was to attack the U.S.”
The government set out to prove that between January 2006 and May 2007, each of the Duka brothers had entered into a conspiracy to murder members of the U.S. military. Prosecutors wouldn’t necessarily find a formal, written or oral agreement spelling out the details of the understanding. They just needed to demonstrate, based on the brothers’ “state of mind,” that the Dukas had knowingly and willfully entered into an agreement, and that at least one of the brothers had performed an overt act to further the agreement.
As was written in the jury instructions:
“Often the state of mind with which a person acts at any given time cannot be proved directly, because one cannot read another person’s mind and tell what he or she is thinking. However a defendant’s state of mind can be proved indirectly from the surrounding circumstances. Thus, to determine a particular defendant’s state of mind at a particular time, you may consider evidence about what the defendant said, what he did and failed to do, how he acted, and all the other facts and circumstances shown by the evidence that may prove what was in that defendant’s mind at that time.”
Since the Dukas were never recorded agreeing to take part in Shnewer’s and Omar’s plot to attack Fort Dix, the government had to prove they were still involved in other, more indirect ways.
For example, the court allowed into evidence the recording of Tony Duka saying he was “going to start something.” In future recordings, he seemed to repudiate this statement, saying, “the biggest Jihad for us here in America is to spread Islam.” But, as mere hearsay, the judge did not allow this statement or others to be presented to the jury unless the defendants were allowed to be cross-examined, meaning Tony would have had to give up his right not to testify. Even though the brothers wanted to take the stand, their lawyers urged them not to do so.
Prosecutors for previous U.S. terrorism cases have sought to establish participation in a conspiracy by displaying videos or websites found on a defendant’s computer that show frightening Islamist propaganda. Mahmoud Omar, during the time he spent with the Dukas’ co-defendant Mohamad Shnewer, asked Shnewer to download many of these videos, which the Dukas sometimes also watched. The prosecution played these videos to the court over the course of several days.
Shain described one juror’s reaction to a lengthy video pulled from Shnewer’s computer of U.S. soldiers being killed in battle by insurgent snipers: “Juror No. 3 got up from her seat before exiting for the break, gave us all a stare of death, turned around and slammed the binder of transcripts.” Juror No. 3, whose name remained concealed, would later tell the Philadelphia Inquirer that it was difficult for her to watch the video because her own son was a marine who had served two tours of duty in Iraq. “I thought I was seeing my son getting hit,” she told the paper.
The prosecutors claimed these videos, along with the Anwar al-Awlaki tapes, which the Duka brothers listened to in the presence of government informant Mahmoud Omar, served as inspiration and guidance for the Fort Dix operation.
To demonstrate this connection, the prosecution called Evan Kohlmann to the stand as an expert witness on Islamic terrorism and the use of digital media to promote terrorism. Kohlmann, who in 2014 was featured in a Human Rights Watch report on dubious terrorism prosecutions, testified that the defendants had been watching “some of al Qaeda’s best work,” and that their consumption of the videos suggested “a clear, considered, and present danger to the community.”
Yet Kohlmann’s analysis has come under considerable scrutiny in recent years. Fawaz Gerges, a professor of international relations at the London School of Economics, told New York magazine, which profiled the self-styled terrorism expert, that Kohlmann was in the “guilty verdict industry.” In an email to The Intercept, Gerges explained that prosecutors consider Kohlmann a “hired hand,” willing to say “whatever it takes” in front of a jury to help secure convictions.
During his testimony, Kohlmann portrayed the acquisition of guns from Mahmoud Omar, in addition to the heated statements the Dukas made about American foreign policy, as evidence of jihadist activity. As for the dearth of evidence substantiating an actual plot, Kohlmann told the jury, “It doesn’t take a lot of sophistication to kill people. Ultimately, it comes down to intent.”
On December 22, 2008, after six days of deliberation, the jury found the Duka brothers and their two friends guilty of conspiracy to kill members of the U.S. military at Fort Dix.
In determining sentences for federal crimes, judges take into account as a starting point the guidelines issued by the U.S. Sentencing Commission. The guidelines have “adjustments” that can be enacted at the judge’s discretion, which can fundamentally change the duration of a sentence. Among these, the terrorism adjustment has the most drastic effect of lengthening sentences.
The Dukas had been found guilty of one count of conspiracy to commit murder and three counts of illegal firearm possession. On those charges alone, they might have faced sentences of up to 24.5 years. But the prosecution requested that Judge Kugler apply the terrorism adjustment, which would dramatically increase that time.
On January 26, 2009, Judge Kugler received a handwritten letter from Mohamad Shnewer, who was awaiting sentencing in solitary confinement at the Philadelphia Federal Detention Center. In his letter, Shnewer described “boastful” discussions with the government informant and confessed to making “lies and allegations” about the Duka brothers’ knowledge of the Fort Dix plot. They were “clueless” about this plan, he wrote.
In April 2009, the Dukas, Tatar and Shnewer were brought before Judge Kugler for sentencing. Shain stood before the court and spoke out against the verdict. “A lot of money has been spent. Millions have been spent on this case. As if money has brought the truth of the matter,” Shain said. “We have stressed over and over again that they’ll lock you up for nothing, they’ll build a case on you. Today we have become victims of what we stressed so very often.”
Delivering Shain’s sentence, the culmination of a terrorism case that had lasted over two years, Judge Kugler said, “It’s not my place or desire at this time to review all the evidence … Suffice to say this defendant was in the middle of this plot. I’m realistic, I remember that they weren’t being taped 24 hours a day seven days a week.”
Brushing off the lack of direct evidence, Kugler added: “That there isn’t more explicit evidence does not concern me and obviously didn’t concern the jury either … I cannot deter this defendant, because of his belief system, from further crimes.”
Shain and Tony were sentenced to life in prison, plus 30 years. Eljvir, who was not convicted of the firearms offenses, received life in prison.
In a public statement made after the Dukas’ sentencing, acting U.S. Attorney Ralph Marra said, “The hatred and contempt these young men hold for America and the rule of law was made abundantly clear.” The life sentences were appropriate, he argued, to “protect the public from them and their deeply held, radical beliefs.”
IN THE YEARS since the convictions, the lives of the Dukas and Chris Christie, the U.S. attorney who prosecuted the brothers’ case, have taken vastly different trajectories. Christie won his race for governor, and is now a likely contender for the Republican presidential nomination.
Christie often cited the Duka case as a highlight of his career. In a 2012 speech to the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Christie recalled his success in the “uncovering of a plot to kill American servicemen and women,” telling a packed audience at the New York Hilton Hotel that he helped send to prison a group of “Muslim men practicing with semi-automatic weapons and screaming about jihad against the infidels.” Today, both the Republican Governors Association and the New Jersey Republican Party list the Fort Dix case as “one of Christie’s finest moments” under his biography.
Meanwhile, the Duka family is struggling. Tony’s five children are growing up without a father. Lata and Firik are faced with raising their grandchildren on their own. Burim, the youngest Duka brother, now 24, and the only one to escape entanglement in the case, dropped out of school to become the family’s primary breadwinner. The Dukas believe they have remained under surveillance. Firik says the FBI once came to the house and threatened to take Burim away. “We lost so much, and today we are barely surviving,” he says. “We live with broken hearts.”
While Shain is imprisoned at a high-security facility in Kentucky, Tony and Eljvir are being held at the infamous ADX Supermax prison in Florence, Colorado, which houses some of the nation’s most dangerous criminals and has famously been described as “a clean version of hell.” Tony and Eljvir have both spent portions of their sentences in solitary confinement, and Eljvir remains in isolation. Despite being locked up in the same prison for years, the two have never seen one another. Without the terrorism adjustment, they might have been released as middle-aged men. With it, they will likely die in prison.
Having exhausted all appeals, the brothers are filing a 2255, or writ of habeas corpus, which is a motion to set aside a sentence on the grounds that it was imposed in violation of federal law. Their appeal hinges on the argument of ineffective performance by their public defenders, but such appeals are rarely successful.
Far away from home, Shain, Tony and Eljvir’s periodic phone calls across the country are their only remaining link with their families. They say they find strength in God and knowledge of their innocence. Eljvir ends every call home with, “God willing, we will be reunited soon, not only in the next life, but this one too.”
Years later, the brothers still look back with incredulity at the events that led to their present situation. The needy friends exposed as government informants, the high-profile arrests and terrorism charges, and finally the life sentences that permanently altered the course of their lives. “We had plans for the future, we were expanding our business just weeks before, our families were growing,” Shain says. “Now, suddenly, we have been buried alive.”
More than seven years after the trial, the person who was arguably the most critical in securing the convictions still agonizes over his role in the case. In a recent interview with The Intercept, Mahmoud Omar, the informant, maintains that while Mohamad Shnewer was involved in the Fort Dix plot, the Dukas, whom he describes as “good people,” were innocent.
“I still don’t know why the Dukas are in jail,” he says.
Sheelagh McNeill contributed research to this report.
Photo Illustration: Connie Yu; Fort Dix: Mel Evans/AP
This case was total bullshit. There was nothing factual to connect the brothers, and that the public defenders couldn’t punch holds in this farce is astounding.
Much respect to Murtaza Hussain and Razan Ghalayini.
The victims change, but the FBI’s game remains the same. J. Edna Hoover would be proud.
“… liberty and justice for all” is just a cynical sound bite.
Just want to add my thanks for a fine bit of heartbreaking reporting, Murtaza and Razan. I will add my prayers that the Duka brothers will be granted a new trial and eventually, freedom. Please keep us updated.
… and not a single banking criminal even charged with a crime.
Was it about a year ago that the British did an in depth investigation of their justice system and found deep seeded and pervasive corruption at all levels–from the prison guards to the judges? If it’s that bad in the UK, it’s just as bad in the U.S.
It’s such an overwhelming problem, it’s hard to know where to start. Perhaps a few high profile prosecutions would send the message that corruption is a serious crime, ruining someone’s life is tantamount to murder; get involved in setups or coverups and YOU risk a long prison term and working a minimum wage job at the end of it. As it is, nothing whatsoever happens to these people. They have nothing to lose and everything to gain by being corrupt. And Americans just say tsk-tsk, and maybe we mount a campaign to free the innocent, but if we don’t punish the perpetrators there will just be more victims. It’s sort of like giving a rape victim counseling, but not bothering to arrest the rapist.
When judges won’t recuse themselves when there are obvious conflicts of interest and there are no systems in place to enforce any sort of impartiality, you can’t expect much. Prior to the current criminal justice system ‘the people’ took out their punishments (or the militaries did); after a, uh, interesting experiment with ‘private business’ (eg Pinkerton), systems were supposedly put in place to encourage a more fair and just legal system and to cut down on corruption. Mostly what we’ve wound up with though is a differently corrupt system, where who gets charged and for what is willy-nilly decided by people with power who can decide whose lives to ruin before they even make it to trial — and those trials ‘by one’s peers’ are no longer accurate due to the changes that have occurred in American society over the years. When things are striated, and getting out of jury duty (or into it) is a sport (or a pain in the ass), and ‘peers’ is, to say the least, rarely accurate, bad things happen — even if the judges are ‘fair’ and the prosecutors are ‘just’. But usually people plead, and a lot of that is because of informants (who use their own informing as part of the plea process).
What do you really expect from this but a lot of heartache and ruined lives?
Incidentally, while yes, punishing those who set corrupt cases like this, and so many others, up would be wonderful, I think we need to shoot first for making them something people don’t get promotions and (work and media) awards over. Or governmental office. The problem isn’t only a lack of a stick — the bigger problem is too many carrots, inducements and rewards.
Great piece !
I do believe the article mentioned that the brothers had a public defender.
Perhaps if they had Dan Stormer (or someone like Dan) as their attorney the case would have turned out differently.
Is there no way, considering that these young men were indeed entrapped, to get them all new trials with competent representation?
More about attorney Dan Stormer:
http://pview.findlaw.com/view/1210367_1
It is conceivable, especially if they just had a PD, and since they did go to trial, that they could file for a mistrial on the basis of attorney incompetence. It’s a slippery slope, to get that, though, and generally speaking the attorney of record has to go along and say ‘why yes, I was incompetent’ for it to even be considered — or someone needs to think that incompetence was very very gross in the macro sense. A better option for an appeal may yet exist in waiting for the zeitgest to change a bit (if that even happens in a way that could benefit them) and then filing on the basis of prosecutorial and/or investigatory overreach… but to really have a chance at getting any sort of appeal at all, you basically have to have a very good lawyer willing to rack up hundreds or thousands of firm manhours and file one hell of a bang-up appeal. What’s sad is this is one of those cases where I feel an appeal really is warranted but won’t ever happen (and part of that has to do with the district these charges were brought up in and filed, with all due respect (if such respect is due) to New Jersey itself (a state that has been priding itself more and more on policing its cities via very very proactive overt and covert surveillance — hardly a venue I’d want a case like this to be tried in if I were them).
Incidentally despite cases with even overwhelming evidence of entrapment and/or provocation, the number of cases that the court has actually considered provocation and/or entrapment isn’t very far off from ‘zero’. Even though it shouldn’t be, especially considering the bizarre things that are being done nowadays to ‘build cases’, entrapment is considered one of those hail mary defenses that mostly only occur on tv shows and in movies (just like that other one about not getting your miranda rights read to you).
@Murtaza, this is a terrific and horrific article.
I do have a nit to pick that I was hoping you might be willing to address, however:
You wrote:
“For the Duka family, the arrests marked a tragic turn. They had escaped the turmoil of the former Yugoslavia and managed to start anew in the United States, only to find three sons publicly branded as terrorists. ”
But the Duka family supposedly:
“entered the United States illegally through Mexico in October 1984. In 1989, the father Ferik Duka applied for asylum with the Immigration and Naturalization Service and acknowledged the family’s illegal entry into the country.” (http://blog.nj.com/ledgerupdates/2007/05/father_of_fort_dix_suspects_ar.html via Wikipedia).
Yugoslavia wasn’t exactly in a tumultuous state of turmoil yet in the early 80s. I suspect the Dukas’ problems may instead have stemmed from their being ethnic Albanians (and secondarily, perhaps, Muslims) in Yugoslovia (in what’s now Macedonia (FYROM), a very Orthodox Christian-oriented country), but this is just speculation. Read the Wikipedia article on Breakup_of_Yugoslavia perhaps for a quick overview of the prevailing history of the times (albeit not a great link, it offers some direction). While there was indeed some tensions in the 80s after Tito died in ’81, especially along the Albanian border, it seems more likely that whatever the Dukas were experiencing was far more personal. Do you happen to know what their longer immigration history was and when they moved from Albania to Macedonia? I’m curious, since they’re Muslim and ethnic Albanian, what may have prompted them to chose to immigrate to a place that is almost totally Orthodox Christian, and knowing the time of it might be informative?
Calling Yugoslavia in a state of turmoil by the mid eighties is actually pretty accurate.
The conflict in former Yugoslavia started as early as 1981 (Pristina, see footnote). Well, actually one could state that it started at the end of WWII, but let us concentrate on what is mentioned in the article. Being “ethnic Albanian” does not refer to a state and does not have to mean “from Macedonia”, which, btw, is about two third FYROM and one third Greece. But let us keep it simple.
The conflict between ethnos started around the beginning of the 1980s, and resulted in one of the most horrible wars in the 1990s.
Technically, Albanians were pretty wide spread over former Yugoslavia. The Duka family could have fled from Kosovo. Albanians are still not very welcome there. Or from what is now Albania. Or Macedonia. Or Serbia. This is in part of what made this conflict so complicated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_protests_in_Kosovo
Make sure you read “Aftermath” as well.
The conflict between ethnos started around the beginning of the 1980s, and resulted in one of the most horrible wars on European soil in the second half of the 19th century.
Technically Albanians were all over former Yugoslavia. The Duka family could have fled from Kosovo. Albanians are still not very welcome there. Or from what is now Albania. Or Macedonia. Or Serbia. This is what made this conflict so complicated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_protests_in_Kosovo
Make sure you read “Aftermath” as well.
I am confused — are you from ex-Yugoslavia? Do you live there? What is your personal knowledge of the region in the 80s?
Your comment about Macedonia is specious btw — while there is indeed a conflict about the name itself, Macedonia itself isn’t xx part FYROM and xx part Greece. It’s a naming conflict. The region that the Dukas supposedly settled in according to Murtaza’s story and other resources show him to have been in *Yugoslavia* in the part that is now known as Macedonia.
I’d continue going through your comment piece by piece but I’m not really convinced you know much about the history of the area, and I’d like to know your background, or if you are basically quoting back things you read from Wikipedia.
Incidentally, one of those ‘most horrible wars in the 1990s’ (a) wasn’t one of the most horrible wars of the 90s, and (b) whatever it was was mostly in the 90s. Yes, there was quite a bit of tragedy but a LOT of that tragedy was US-led (and again, in the NINETIES, not the early 80s when they supposedly migrated — from a place NOWHERE NEAR Kosovo, ostensibly, which is what I was trying to find out). This includes when NATO basically bombed civilian centers far away from the (now NATO-run) Kosovo border (including ‘accidentally’ bombing a Chinese embassy in Belgrade) — and you don’t see many ethnic Albanians very happy to be living under NATO rule now, but that’s another story, so nevermind any of this.
I was trying to find out what the family’s history was. I don’t need a history lesson. :) One of the main reasons I was asking the author is because I figured he’d have access to the source materiel, and/or the people involved, and could flesh it out a bit. Nothing more ironic than coming from a country where, perhaps, they felt persecuted for religious beliefs only to wend their way through other countries and wind up in a country where they’re both persecuted AND prosecuted for them.
Regardless, none of this is immediately relevant to the fact that it was disingenuous to say there was turmoil quite yet. There was some dissatisfaction, for sure, but all of that wasn’t even building to a crescendo yet. Think what happened in Ukraine but stretched out over a long long period of time. And don’t leave out the US involvement (Otpor). And all of that really tumultuous (non-occasional-skirmish) stuff WAS in the 90s (though I’ll split it with you and say it certainly was getting there by the mid to late 80s — and by then they’d already left the region, hence my questions).
And I hope that was a typo when you called the 1980’s the 19th century ;)
They didn’t immigrate, Duka’s have lived there for centuries. The village they’re from (Spas) is literally right next to the Albanian border. Furthermore, western Macedonia is (and has been) mainly inhabited by Albanians.
From Wikipedia on the London Conference of 1913:
“As a result of the decisions taken and because of pressures from Greece and Serbia, half of the predominantly native Albanian territory of Independent Albania and between 30%[4] and 40% of the Albanian population was left out of the newly established Principality of Albania.[5] In particular Kosovo Vilayet was given to Serbia and Chameria to Greece.[5]”
@Murtaza, this is a terrific and horrific article.
I do have a nit to pick that I was hoping you might be willing to address, however:
You wrote:
“For the Duka family, the arrests marked a tragic turn. They had escaped the turmoil of the former Yugoslavia and managed to start anew in the United States, only to find three sons publicly branded as terrorists. ”
But the Duka family supposedly:
“entered the United States illegally through Mexico in October 1984. In 1989, the father Ferik Duka applied for asylum with the Immigration and Naturalization Service and acknowledged the family’s illegal entry into the country.” (http://blog.nj.com/ledgerupdates/2007/05/father_of_fort_dix_suspects_ar.html via Wikipedia).
Yugoslavia wasn’t exactly in a tumultuous state of turmoil yet in the early 80s. I suspect the Dukas’ problems may instead have stemmed from their being ethnic Albanians (and secondarily, perhaps, Muslims) in Yugoslovia (in what’s now Macedonia (FYROM), a very Orthodox Christian-oriented country), but this is just speculation. Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_Yugoslavia perhaps for a quick overview of the prevailing history of the times (albeit not a great link, it offers some direction). While there was indeed some tensions in the 80s after Tito died in ’81, especially along the Albanian border, it seems more likely that whatever the Dukas were experiencing was far more personal. Do you happen to know what their longer immigration history was and when they moved from Albania to Macedonia? I’m curious, since they’re Muslim and ethnic Albanian, what may have prompted them to chose to immigrate to a place that is almost totally Orthodox Christian, and knowing the time of it might be informative?
. ‘. The man who would be president – spend the taxpayers money on everything except things that would benefit the workers…Over 200 million tax dollars for Atlantic City Casinos – to watch them declare bankruptcy… Xanadu – 350 million dollars in tax concessions… 102 million dollars to help Panasonic move from Secaucus to Newark ?? a multi billion dollar corporation?? Jobs?? How many fully trained electronic engineers do you think there are in New Jersey?? H1B work visas?? Panasonic closed their warehousng in N.J. over a decade ago… TAX CUTS for his future contributors to his Presidential Campaign coffers..
. . Meadowlands Racetrack – employee told to take benefit reductions of it is closed?? Bundled with the Monmouth Racetrack and sold to a R* * * * * party member?
Great Deal for Exxon – MISSED the Pension Payment HE AGGREED TO.. DETRIOT cut pension on those collecting them after declaring bankruptcy.. Hostess Foods gave bones and pay raises to all the executives and declared bankruptcy ( union pensions hurt). The new Republican Party Policy… Talks of raising Social Security minimum age to 70… IS HE REALLY A MINER?? HE KEEPS GIVING WORKERS THE SHAFT > > elected to represent the people????
The working class built America – It built New Jersey . Big Sign In Trenton – – New Jersey Makes – the world takes…. S H A F T ? ? from the absentee governor……knows nothing of bridge gate?? NEVER HERE – George Bush was the VACATIONIST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY- – – Christie ?.?.?.?.?
agreed – too many Gs. Hostess Foods “bonuses” not bones other than fuuny bones cakes…..
Hi there William –
Not sure I understood all of your rant, but I totally agree that this (channeling Matlock again) “jackass” is a poor stick of a Gov. and would be a HORRIBLE president. Why anyone voted for him, I know not.
I’ll bet Americans hate it when the State lives up to its worst reputation. I, myself, could get only two-thirds of the way through this sad story.
The FBI, DEA, CIA, NSA and every other agency in that national security alphabet soup need convictions in order to continue to suck on the financial resources of a state up to its nostrils in a sea of debt. And if that means entrapping minorities — whether blacks, immigrants, or illegal aliens — in a fictitious plot, so be it. Meanwhile, real terrorist plots, be they domestic or international — e.g., the Boston Marathon bombing and the Mumbai attack — glide easily to their successful goal. These are too difficult for the American agencies to discover and foil, so they concentrate on manufacturing their own “terrorists” and their own “plots” so they can make themselves look useful and heroic. It’s pathetic.
You should have read to the end. There you will see what action they took in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy. And ask yourself, What government agent could induce or intrap me into purchasing assault weapons? Do this whenever you see “entrapment” cited as an excuse or a defense. Read thoroughly, thoughtfully and critically.
Come off it. They bought firearms illegally. They didn’t sit around conspiring about how to use them to kill people in a terrorist act, and they certainly didn’t all sit around talking about shooting up Fort Dix while roasting marshmallows over a fire to make s’mores and discussing plans to blow up the Pentagon. In fact they didn’t even want the shit that COULD do that sort of damage and they thought it was sketchy as hell.
But hey, whatever lets you sleep at night, buddy.
If the government can railroad Muslim simpletons into prison, they could railroad you, and more importantly, me into prison. If the general public knew the facts of this case, they may not convict future defendants, even if they deserve to be convicted. The governments position on what happened on September 11, 2001 is also easily disproved. What will be the straw that breaks the camels back that causes Americans to not trust the United States government?
This surprises you? I knew a Hutaree Militia guy who only went on weekends to play army and his only crime was listening to a guy who said he wished he could shoot a traffic cop as a group of them passed the cop on the highway and then shoot some more cops when they went to his funeral. The “conspiracy” was a one-time 15-second rant he listened to as they passed the cop who was writing a ticket on the highway. This guy who was victimized by the FBI was a truck driver who had spoilage of hot sauce and salad dressing and the FBI tried to make a jury believe this was food stocks to be used to wage war. The actual truth is that the prosecution ended when the jury began to literally laugh at the FBI agents, DOJ prosecutors and the criminal informant they used to create this farce. This is the nation we live in and we will get more of this nonsense as they try to make their irrelevacy seem important. And knowing what a joke the FBI is, they will continue to get recruits by the thousands, each of them being good little fascists willing to do anything for thier job and justify their parasitic existence because it beats working in a US factory for wages that are more akin to tose paid by the Chinese. These agents are willing to lie, perjure, frame and conspire to create a reasofor their useless existence. I meet moronic Americans by the hundreds every day who oblivious to the nonsense the FBI perpetrates and people ignorantly give it credibility. The FBI should have no more credibility than the lying politicians at the DNC or the RNC.
LOL. If the despicable Mehdi Hasan – who is on the record, on video no less, claiming that all non-Muslims are “cattle – is “depressed, frustrated & angry” about this, it must be a good thing.
May there be many, many more “scams” like this.
Because imprisoning the innocent is a good thing? Ever consider the possibility that once priorities change you might be targeted in the same manner?
Doubt if Hasan said that. Can you offer a citation?
It’s available on youtube. Do your research, or continue living in denial.
Trolls such as this “Louise” thing are infamous for leaving out or lying about context.
Here is an excerpt from the link. As most always when I leave a link with a short snip from the link, I suggest that you read the entire article to get the full understanding and or impact of what was written.
@Kitt. But then again, what does facts matter to people like Louise? They don’t like their preconceived bigotry to be rocked by truth. ‘No, no, don’t rock my boat. I love to hate that that I don’t (want to) understand.’
Except that Mehdi Hasan is wrong about the meaning of the word, Kaafir.
It does NOT simply refer to a non-Muslim as he states.
It refers to a person who consciously and deliberately rejects something they recognize to be the truth, something no human being has the capacity to know about another person. And, therefore, it should never be used for specific persons, even for those who say they are atheists.
There is an even deeper meaning of the word, Kaafir, to many Sufi Muslims. But I won’t go there at this point.
Thanks for your clarification. If this is something you’d care to or like to do, maybe you would write him about that.
You’re an incredibly callous person if you enjoy seeing people convicted of crimes they clearly did not commit, simply because they belong to an ethnicity you hate.
You are generous, but I’m a nice guy too, so I understand the mild admonishment.
After being targeted for a dozen years by the comfortable patriot-filth associated with her side — the group stalking, harassment, physical torture, etc. — I still can’t muster anything comparable to their violent malice and cynicism.
You are generous, but I’m a nice guy too, so I understand the mild admonishment.
After being targeted for a dozen years by the comfortable patriot-filth associated with her side — the group stalking, harassment, physical torture, etc. — I still can’t muster anything comparable to her violent malice and cynicism.
Stan, while we may disagree on things occasionally, I just wanted to point out that paying anybody to ‘be’ a certain way often winds up acting as its own feedback system… eventually they may not only ‘be’ a certain way but BELIEVE a certain way. When you’re the attacker, as trolls (and especially paid trolls) are, there’s rarely a disincentive to participate — or an incentive to disengage. Usually the biggest incentives come to those who run things into the ground. Expecting compassion for the falsely accused tends to go out the window along with most other compassion for those not in (a) an in-group or (b) some external group an in-group has sworn (to self or others) to ‘protect’. Expecting a paid troll to show compassion is an exercise in futility.
Heart-breaking. Humanity is aching from the injustice imposed.
“There, they did what any group of young men might do on vacation: they went skiing, played paintball in the woods, rode horses at the stables and went to the shooting range.” Why? Why, why, why? Why the bloody guns? And how the hell does it have anything to do with God? That’s absolutely backwards and if that’s what those young men learned and if that’s what they feel it means to become devout, then they are lost and those who encouraged them down that path are lost. The people are too often their own worst enemy.
Other than that, I hope that they regain their freedom. (Solitary confinement, endlessly, can have nothing to do with justice. That’s only about power. The state belongs to the Devil, clearly. God doesn’t torture anyone, on earth or in someplace beyond. He doesn’t condone it and there is no Biblical hell. There’s only this manmade hell we all live every day. Hell – the afterlife type that is supposed to never end – is a manmade concept. And people who made it and are capable of believing it are twisted.) But I don’t like them one bit. Or any out there like them.
You should get the real facts from the criminal complaint -linked from Wikipedia page about this terrorist plot
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Fort_Dix_attack_plot
– not this laughable jihadi-appeasing “journalism”.
Just count the separate instances of them going to tactical training.
And this gives you something of an idea about what sort of scum we are dealing with here:
“60. On or about March 10, 2007, CW-2 consensually recorded conversations during a meeting with DRITAN DUKA and SHAIN DUKA. When CW-2 asked DRITAN DUKA and SHAIN DUKA about SERDAR TATAR, SHAIN DUKA explained that TATAR wanted to join the U.S. Army so that he could kill U.S. soldiers from the “inside.” When CW-2 asked about TATAR again, DRITAN DUKA remarked, “He had only one mind, how to kill American soldiers.” Later during the consensually recorded conversation, DRITAN DUKA and SHAIN DUKA said that rather than waging jihad overseas, they could do so in the United States. SHAIN DUKA also stated, “Because as far as people we have enough, 7 people. And we are all crazy. That’s what is needed . . .” DRITAN DUKA later in the conversation also
stated, “For people, 7 people are a lot. We can do a lot of things with 7 people . . . We can do a lot of damage with 7 people . . . you do big things with 7 people.” Toward the end of the meeting, SHAIN DUKA suggested that they could also join the Army and “do them, we can.” “
This is the first sentence in that Wikipedia link you posted:
The 2007 Fort Dix attack plot involved a group of six radical Islamist men who conspired to stage an attack against U.S. Military personnel stationed at Fort Dix, New Jersey.[1] The alleged goal of the group was to “kill as many soldiers as possible”.[2]
I’ve seen a lot of Wikipedia posts that are less than factual, but this one seems to have been completely taken over by the prosecution team and the team of FBI who are in the business of drumming up as much funding as possible by creating their own plots and then celebrating after foiling their own plots.
But then, I’m making the mistake of bothering with the amateur propagandist calling itself “Louise Cypher,” or “LOL” for short. It’s just that it somewhat surprised me to see a wiki post that had been allowed to be totally propagandized beyond all reality. Usually some editing occurs which tempers the dishonesty, and myths built by government sources and compliant stenographic media.
You seem to lack even the most basic of ideas about how Wikipedia entries are made, dummy. Feel free to go on there and change anything you consider “propagandized”; the only thing you need is links to reputable sources.
Yeah, that’s what I said, “dummy.” I know how wiki works. This wiki post isn’t working that way. As I said, the very first sentence proves that this wiki entry has been taken over because it states as fact something which is clearly not a fact at all. If you can explain that, then do so.
Kitt, I wouldn’t bother arguing with Louise. S/he has the ‘inside scoop’ if you catch my meaning.
Louise Lame: Criminal complaints are typically a joke, and about as far from the truth as you can get. The indictment filed 30 days later is often different from the initial allegations contained in the complaint. Citing a wiki entry that contains more than likely lots of bullshit from a ‘criminal complaint’ probably should not be used to make or further any argument. You are obviously unfamiliar with federal law. Have fun trolling.
What you are quoting is the criminal complaint. It is not a finding of fact, but the opposite. Its sole purpose is to persuade the reader that the defendants are criminals. It is exactly the opposite of objective – it’s not supposed to be objective.
The prosecution can’t directly misquote anyone, but notice how they use tiny, tiny snippets of direct quotation, surrounded by their own words.
While you may be convinced by this, it is not the “real facts” and does not even pretend to be.
Hahahahaha I’m guessing your one of the prosecutors that are going crazy cause the truth came.
Wow, the crimes government will commit to stop law-breakers is horrible. I wish we could slow or stop the machine of the state. But I fear it’s too late. The irony of the obsession over the confederate flag along with the fact that children worship the American flag every morning is not lost on me. Twighlight zone here we… are?
“You should think about finding yourself a new religion”, says the fascist. In other words, you should think about becoming an American.
Hi BenjaminAP –
Thanks so much for posting that quote. John Kiriakou rocks!!!
You know, I’ve been wondering a lot about this lately — is it really ‘terrorism’ that the current American enemy is, or is it ‘Anti-Americanism’ (both in and outside of America)? Is it really so much about Americans getting blown up, or isn’t it just a cultural war deriving from a (hypocritical) lack of tolerance in general? ‘My dog’s better than your dog’?
The FBI is corrupt. All intelligence agencies are corrupt. All of law enforcement is corrupt.
And here’s the crux of the issue–it’s an industry; a huge, money making industry. If you can’t round up terrorists, you’re not earning your keep. If the masses are not afraid, you’re obsolete. They have to manufacture danger in order to keep their jobs and maintain a robust surveillance industry, not to mention a thriving arms industry. They need a few *scary* high profile cases now and then to keep the masses on edge and make themselves look like heroes. Wake up, America!
I think you’re onto something, WUA.
The moment I tweeted this article twiiter locked my account. Anyone else experience this?
The Intercept is really great and this article too, but… I’ve seen this story, along with similar ones (which have been published here as well recently) on french television and in the french press… 2 years ago I think.
Not saying that French media are better, that’s not my point : how come this only gets out in the US now ?!
Thank you for this article.
A horrible horrible tragedy. The FBI is out of control. Thank you for this piece.
I forgot Christie was attorney-general, when this happened.He was also proud of ’44 corrupted-some-of-them rabbis’ case.I think he governor by time Tony Mack got convicted. Hoboken’s new mayor took a bribe–was Christie the governor then?
They all involved some type of entrapment.The crime would not have occurred, without this entrapment.
What court is hearing the writ of habeas corpus?
A truly disgusting miscarriage of justice. Chris Christie should be the one in prison.
This story is sickening. To destroy the lives of the kind of people that made this country. How can jury judge and prosecutors sleep at night? And Christies strAight up lies. The people responsible for railroading this family is the worzt this country has to offer.
This was a FBI plot from the beginning.
Agency has too much time on their hands.
Scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Hire or negotiates deals with criminals to produce entrapment.
Time better spent studying Chechen, no doubt.
???.
AHA! I think I may have discovered what the cause of Christopher whatevertheheckyournameis’s problem is!!!
Those ???’s are the commenting system rejecting non English ISO characters. Only Latinates post. Or if that’s not his problem, it is DEFINITELY a rather troubling problem that ought be addressed if and when you actually manage to hire someone to work on the commenting system.
(Incidentally, I’d posted the Russian Cyrillic for ‘No’ (three characters)).
AHA! I think I may have discovered what the cause of Christopher whatevertheheckyournameis’s problem is!!!
Those ???’s are the commenting system rejecting non English ISO characters. Only Latinates post. Or if that’s not his problem, it is DEFINITELY a rather troubling problem that ought be addressed if and when you actually manage to hire someone to work on the commenting system.
(Incidentally, I’d posted the Russian Cyrillic for ‘No’ (three characters); Now I’m doubly glad I didn’t put in the Cyrillic characters for Macedonia’s abbreviate in my message to the author, posted way up)).
I called up their lawyers after they were convicted, talked with The Innocence Project —no DNA, no plot, no nothing.I read every word of their trial, every day.
This case is very personal to me b/c I am part of America that believes being Muslim after 9/11, is like being Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.
Their chances are very slim.
What can I do to make their chances better?
So… Serdar Tatar is serving 33 years for basically playing along with Omar while waiting for the FBI to contact him about his tip? I’d love to say something pithily sarcastic here, but forget it. This is just horrible.
The Madrid, Spain bombing in 2004, the London, England bombing in 2005, and 9-11, etc., were all Western-government-sponsored terrorism, working together to carry out terrorism in the West in order to “justify” and “legitimize” the perpetual war OF(!) terrorism; so, of course they entrap and frame people to make it falsely look like we’re surrounded by so-called “jihad ‘terrorists'” all across the Western countries, to get the majority of the populations of all of those countries to live in fear and blindly support what is really a war against human rights and civil liberties, and to get the majority-populations of those countries to acquiesce to and support this war against the free peoples of the world, doing away with their liberties and freedoms, and bringing them under a global slave and totalitarian militarized police state, with no True Liberty and Freedom.
These government criminals are getting worse and worse, and more and more brazen; and, as the the recordings of the “news” reports in the above video show, they are brazenly false-propagandizing us, telling and convincing most of us that innocent people are “Islamic radicals”, etc. It is of course absolutely disgusting that these government-criminals-and-terrorists, and their propaganda-arm media talking-heads, are perpetrating these crimes and getting away with it to an ever-increasing extent; but, since these governments are no longer truly about liberty and freedom, and are actually really about the exact opposite, completely enslaving all of us under totalitarian corporate-fascism, it is not surprising that they are getting worse and worse, increasingly brazen, and perpetrating these ever-escalating crimes against liberty and freedom.
As many including myself have long been saying as we’ve watched for the past fourteen years as this blatant fascism has been, by design, intentionally escalated, we in the West, and the West’s victims around the world, are now living in “the (world) of the (slaves) and the (planet) of the (cowards)”, because we’re allowing ourselves to have our countries and world turned into this “Fourth Reich” globalist, totalitarian militarized police state, and cooperating with our liberties and freedoms being eliminated. Don’t get me wrong, those liberties and freedoms cannot truly be taken away, because they are an innate part of us from our having been born with them within us, but these government-criminals-and-terrorists are increasingly treating us like they don’t exist, by violating, contravening and abrogating them to a larger and larger extent.
If it isn’t (far?) too late, and if we don’t somehow take our government(s) back and restore TRUE liberty and freedom, we are all “fracked”. They are turning our once relatively-free-and-wonderful countries and world into a war zone where everyone is a suspect and presumed “guilty”. The most innocent things are painted as “suspicious”, threatening the liberty, freedom, rights and very lives of us all. How do we turn this around? I don’t have all of the answers. I’ve been so disgusted with the way things have gotten to be the last fourteen years, and are getting to be more and more; but, because of my being totally physically disabled and on an extremely-low, below-poverty-line income, other than speaking out and trying to wake more Americans and others up to what’s really happening, I feel powerless in the face of this rising fascism that is not being reversed.
What do we do? What can we do? The real terrorists are supposedly “the good guys”, and all of “We, the People” who are doing nothing but non-violently fulfilling our duty(ies) to stand up against all of this increasing-tyranny, fascist-madness and government-sponsored-terrorism, and to fight for the preservation, or restoration, of True Liberty and Freedom, are supposedly “the bad guys”, “the ‘extremists'”, the “unprivileged (meaning we supposedly have no rights) ‘enemy’ belligerents” and the so-called “terrorists”, etc. How do we stand up against that without sooner than later becoming victims of being targeted as “threats” that must be dealt with by the more-and-more-totalitarian government(s)? How do we restore and preserve True Liberty and Freedom without being disposed of as so-called “enemies of the state” for only non-violently doing what liberty and freedom require of us to stop this madness?
” Madrid, Spain bombing in 2004, the London, England bombing in 2005, and 9-11, etc., were all Western-government-sponsored terrorism,”
You are insane.
No, from the sound of it, I’m saner than you’ll probably ever be. I face what’s really going on. Clearly, you do not. You won’t look into it, so you assume the propaganda from the governments involved, and their mainstream media propaganda arm, that these attacks were supposedly not false-flag attacks carried out by those governments, is true; even though it most-definitely is NOT. The TRUTH sets people free, as it could you as well, NOT believing mass-false-propaganda LIES, living in deep avoidance and denial of the truth, and believing all or most of the fear-mongering, like most people in the U.S. and the West in particular do, so-successfully getting them to give up their rapidly-evaporating liberties, freedoms and rights, and acquiesce to their Western countries, and the world, being turned into a totalitarian militarized police state. Wake up! Things are VASTLY not as they seem, and most of what we are propagandized with paints a FAR DIFFERENT picture than reality! “The truth IS out there!” Face what’s really happening, and truly live FREE, or continue to avoid and deny what’s really going on, and be a slave to lies and evil! Look with real discernment past ALL of the false propaganda, and you should find that everything I’ve said is nothing but the truth; otherwise, if you don’t face the truth, you will remain a part of the mass-insanity that most people are a part of, and you will remain un-free!
In the US, on today’s morning CNN report (as an example of a universal trend in the states), the top bulletin is about an attack on a hotel in Tunisia upon tourists by some terrorist group. Meanwhile, domestically, a cruise ship’s plane or helicopter in Alaska has crashed and killed everyone on it – nine people, presumably Americans. In the past, that domestic news would be the top bulletin, as it concerns Americans and affects their vacation plans far more likely than does the Tunisian situation. It is something to do with transportation safety in the US. But our heads are being turned to distant events in an effort to engage us with countries we only vaguely imagine to be “with us” and “against the terrorists” no matter their actuality or level of corruption or what have you. The old song – “What were their names – did you have a friend on the good Reuben James” comes to mind. Our press has decided it can draw on an infinite supply of terrorism fears to reinforce the message of 9/11, constantly. You can be sure the Alaskan helicopter crash was real tragedy and no false flag, because it is of such secondary importance and will get almost no discussion in the media, the victims of negligence or whatever soon forgotten.
Wo, check out Paul Craig Roberts and Stephen Lendman telling it completely like it is(!):
Truth is a Crime Against The State / EU Bashes “Russian Propaganda”
http://www.prisonplanet.com/truth-is-a-crime-against-the-state.html
A fine, well-written expose’ of injustice in the US Department of Justice, the authors made one highly significant error: they neglected to characterize this statement as merely unproven allegation – “On September 11, 2001, hijacked planes crashed into the Word Trade Center towers and the Pentagon. ” This propaganda meme is exactly the source of the injustice visited upon the Dukas. In nearly 14 years, there has been no incontrovertible evidence that the planes were hijacked, that there were planes involved, or that the the planes had anything to do with the collapse of the towers. The counter-terrorism team of the FBI under Mike Dick with the Defense Intelligence Agency counter-nuclear proliferation team called Able Danger, under the leadership of Col. Hanke had tracked the theft of nuclear devices from Pantex through the Port of Houston to Mauritania, remanufacture by Israel, delivery to the NYC Israeli consulate to the safehouse in Fort Lee NJ. White moving vans of Israeli, Dominic Suter’s Urban Moving Systems were followed on the morning of 9-11. Two were bound for the Lincoln and Holland tunnels and apprehended at the entrance. They were intended to block egress from NYC after the demolition of the WTC. Another UBS van was stopped at the George Washington Bridge and the stopped the demolition that was to destroy the cable anchors, causing the bridge to have fallen onto the fiber-optic financial transmission cables below, cutting communication from the financial center of the country. This would have plunged the US into a long decapitated depression.
Three Urban Moving Systems vans were followed to the WTC parking lot and abandoned. When they blew up as part of the demolition, the Freon tanks directly below the vans was forced into the WTC complex basements and in the central core, the blast temperatures changed the Freon to deuterium fluoride which is a fuel for fusion reactions since the 1960s. The fission-fusion tactical grade low yield neutron detonation was a shaped charge that was directed upward by the deep placement. Airliner collisions with the buildings were only a ploy to misdirect and mislead unsuspecting Americans from the real cause of the pulverizing of thousands of tons of resin-bonded concrete and the melting of hundreds of thousands of steel. Deep under the debris steel and glass melted and even vaporized and the radioactive decay process continued. A foam solution had to be sprayed over the debris pile to halt the radiation that prevented workers removal of the debris and caused many of them multiple myeloma cancers.
In fact, Israel had once more carried out a false flag covert op with the traitorous collaboration of the Bush-Cheney-Clinton-Obama Crime Family. Beginning with the JFK Assassination-Coup putting Zionist LBJ into the White House and permitting the manufacture of nuclear weapons at Dimona, Israel has had amazing access to US nuclear inventory, through Bush I AND II. Collaborating with the Khazarian Global Crime Family lead by Binyamin Netanyahu, the two crime families stole 1/3 of the US nuclear weapons and according to Secretary of Defense the day before 9-11, $2.3 Trillion “unaccounted for” and still unaccounted. The investigative team that died at the Pentagon were not accountants but 35 members of the Able Danger counter nuclear proliferation team called to a briefing by Major General Richard Myer. The general didn’t show but a cruise missile from a Dolphin-class submarine off shore did. Someone in the USAF and the USN permitted the completion of its flight. The six largest mainstream news media have also been complicit in the coverup and the treason extends to the legislative and judicial branches. The unconstitutional overthrow of the electoral process in Florida was plan B when it looked like Gore would win the presidency. Five members of the court had been appointed by Bush I and ruled illegally on a process reserved for the state alone.
But then had Gore won, he was to be assassinated or incapacitated so that his running mate, Lieberman, could place another Zionist in the top office. The competing crime families then found ways to continue their collaboration with 9-11 and the War on Terror. By agreement the Bush II team continued the collaboration by attacking Israel’s political and economic competitors in the Mideast with a War on Terror and the continued cover up. Our government is the most unAmerican, corrupt, and dangerous political faction in the world.
“JFK Assassination-Coup putting Zionist LBJ into the White House ”
“Collaborating with the Khazarian Global Crime Family lead by Binyamin Netanyahu”
“had Gore won, he was to be assassinated or incapacitated so that his running mate, Lieberman, could place another Zionist in the top office. ”
You really do need to seek professional mental health help, buddy.
The Dukas family will spend the rest of their lives in a caged hell because of their beliefs. Land of the free my ass. The FBI has sadly gone off the rails with the counter terrorism operations. Just like the FBI ruined many lives during the civil rights movement in the 50’s they are still at it today. Life in prison for being manipulated into conceiving a supposed “plot”. Anyone with a brain can see, if from what The Intercept reported is accurate, which I have found always is, that these guys were entrapped and basically framed so that the case could be paraded around to the public as a justification for the spending of millions on supposed “security”. These injustices are a truly horrific result people the fear people have in them. I truly feel for this family and wish I could do something to help them.
Ultimately the cost of the war on terror has done what the failed 9-11 covert false flag did not: it has destroyed the US economy by other means, while attacking Muslims globally from the Middle East, to the Rohinga in Malaysia, Muslims in Bali and Indonesia, and here in the USA. Iraq alone has so far cost about $3 Trillion and taken over a million lives, and leaving hundreds of thousands of able American young men and women maimed, disabled, or dead.
The US government is the most powerful terrorist organization to have ever existed.
The Koran won’t help them. God is dead and Alvin has killed him.
“Omar was eventually paid $238,000 for his efforts”
“Shain and Tony were sentenced to life in prison, plus 30 years. Eljvir, who was not convicted of the firearms offenses, received life in prison.”
un-fucking believable….
A friend of mine had a taste of this treatment, too. Not as drastic, though. He looks pretty islamic, his dad being from iran, his mom german. When 16, he was charged with shop lifting: some walmart detective had so obviously watched him while shopping, that he tried to fool him into thinking he was indeed stealing, by taking things, acting as ih he’d put them into his jacket, and later losing the objects somewhere else secretly. After he payed for his batteries and chewing gum, he was charged for shop lifting, even though they did not find a single item. Still the detective remembered all the items my friend had picked up, which, eventually, summed up to roughly about 300$ worth of stuff.
His mom, then living divorced from his dad, with whom he lived, used this case to get the court to rule that my friend has to stay with his mom now. She did not want an advocate, announced he was guilty and accepted the punishment (social work, living with his mom, and a two year suspended sentence).
(His mom was pretty pushy, using this sentence to once force him, nearly two years later, to stay home and not go to the woodstock revival concert, by calling the cops and telling/showing them where he hid is water pipe and herbs, which brought him into prison for several month. You need no enemies when having a mom like this, i’D say).
Nearly sixteen years later, several years after 9/11, my friend was being pulled out by police when driving. He was not going fast, and they did not find drugs on him, nor alcohol, so they ordered a blood test, because the officer, who seems to dislike my friend for looking like a muslim (though raised as christian) was sure he was on drugs. He gets imprisoned for a month, then he has a court hearing, where he learned that his s blood samp le did not show up in time. He has to wait another month in jail. He back then used to live with his dad who was just being attested with lung cancer, taking care for his handicaped little brother. Another month passes by, and at court he learns that the blood sample got “lost”, so there was no evidence against him for doing anything wrong. He might just get out of jail now, if not….
…court remembers the case of shop lifting. He was sentenced for stealing more than 300$ worth of goods, which makes him an anrogate felony, which now allows the court to get him immideately kicked out of the usa, since he was born in germany and therefore, even though his dad had an American passport, he did not have American citizenship.
He had the choice to either leave immideately, or to stay in jail and try to reopen the shop lifting case and fight against the court order. He reached his mom and asked for the documents on the shop lifting case, but her respond was that she didn’t know where they were. He then tried to get the documents from the court that sentenced him, but learned that they had just recently deletet everything, so he had no chance to reopen the case. As his dad was turning seriously ill and the family could not afford expensive lawyers – he had jail mates that spend ten thousands on lawyers and still got kicked out in similar cases – he decided to leave USA and return to germany, where he lived in a house for homeless, which is where i met and came to know him.
It was a few weeks later, he was skyping with his dad and a lawyer, when he learned that his dad, having lung cancer in an advanced state that metastazed into his brain already, had camped outside the house of his mom insisting not to leave before she’d look for those documents on the shop lifting case. She finally gave in, looked into the garage and found all the paper work in a box. The lawyer looked at the papers, testifying that it would have been an easy task to reopen the shop lifting case, get his status as felony removed and get allowed to stay with his family in the usa. But now, since he had left USA, there was no way of reopening the case, he will never be able to come home.
He sat at my computer, sobbing like a small child. Several month later, first his brother died, unexpected, and a few days later his dad died of cancer, too. He had no chance to say good bye, or even go to the furneral. My friend used to be a great musician, but he is on a lot of drugs now against depressions and many other things, so he is not himself anymore. He is not locked up, but sure he wishes he was dead every day.
But the fun part about it is, that my friend denies that anything of this has to do with him being half iranian. I mean, when you look at him, he looks like alladin, just add the turban and a genie in a bottle. For me it is evident that the actual reason why he so easily got in trouble, locked away for month and then kicked out, was him looking muslim. I think the american officials can get away with everything, even murder, if they just assume you had anything to do with terrorists how ever remote…
Cool story, bro.
Stefan –
That is such a heartbreaking story. Must add your friend to the prayer list.
“… liberty and justice for all” is just a cynical sound bite.
Imagine how many other lives have been similarly impacted as your friend’s has.
This case today in the UK court was not labelled ‘terrorist’ as relatives of the victim pointed out. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-east-wales-33252264
Chris Christie has another crazy “terrorism” case too, one covered by the This American Life radio program.
http://m.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/387/arms-trader-2009
This link plays the whole program rather than picking and choosing in the AnotherPerson link;)
http://www.thisamericanlife.org/sites/all/play_music/play_full.php?play=387
After 9/11 Bush dick rounded up thousands of South Asians and browned skinned people and held them without charges for years. Over 300 were sent to Passaic County jail mentioned in the radio program. Our group was able to work only with three detainees and after two to three years we were able, with help from lawyers, to get them released. The prisoners were routinely harassed, threatened with dogs, isolated and physically and mentally abused. Such a disgusting horror story for all those innocents. Our freedom loving government is illegitimate and needs to be overthrown! One was deported, two released. One of them died 100 days after release: Farouk Abdel-Muhti—a stateless Palestinian.
Thank you for this brilliant investigation. The U.S. is a militaristic police state with no regard for human life – and this truth has manifested itself primarily with black, brown, or Muslim Americans as victims. Pieces of shit like Chris Christie have no problem ruining lives to get ahead politically. The U.S. always has and always will need a boogeyman to justify its illegal, violent actions. The group that is targeted nowadays happens to be Muslims. As with the other ‘create-a-boogeyman’ moments in American history, this will be looked back on as one of the most shameful times in American history.
Well said. It always takes time for excesses to be looked back on in the proper light. One day it’ll be seen as something like Japanese internment…
I know this isn’t related to the article but it does somewhat correlate to the article and your comment — are you (or anybody) planning on writing a lengthy piece on Jade Helm at all, especially in context of how it seems to be oriented to practicing a lot of the same ‘tricks’ as those used in the Dukas’ case?
Most of the spying on Americans is done by the NSA. Most of the terrorist plots against America are organized by the FBI. And we can only guess to what extent the CIA is still involved in narcotics trafficking.
Firstly, these lawbreakers all deserve to be in jail, not living off our tax dollars.
But more importantly: How many FBI terrorist plots were accidentally successful?
Ask Timothy McVeigh, Attorney Jesse Trentadue, and the FBI agents who have been hiding Operation PATCON and the mistaken torture and murder by the FBI of Kenneth Trentadue for the last 20 years after they mistook him for Richard Lee Guthrie.
J. Edna Hoover’s legacy continues. Originally, I thought the Trentadue case seemed too blatant to be sidelined. Alas, I was wrong.
The entire Tsarnaev caper. But as for ‘accidentally successful’, there are no accidents..
This is infuriating. Paranoia, ignorance and blissful negligence is what mostly comes to mind. The treatment and mindset against those who practice Islam is terrible and deplorable.
As a Muslim i am shaking with anger after reading this. Lot could be said but all in vain because my countrymen here in america are so delusional in their ideas about their government and who actually runs their daily affairs that it is very hard to even start a conversation. They have been divided by Party line, race, state, city and even county. For last three months i have been trying to get one of my Christian Conservative friend to watch Sicko from Michael Moore. He wont touch it, He says it is full of lies. I was able to convince his wife to watch that movie and she was crying for days.
It is a fact that USA government loves killing and butchering kids and babies all over the world. In last two decades it just happens that those babies belongs to Muslims parents. Government know all this so they would come a Muslim and check his state of mind to see if he is going to do anything about it. Truth of the matter is if Islam had allowed Muslims to kill innocent civilian there would be a 911 every couple of minutes but fact is it does not.
“O you who have believed, seek help through patience and prayer. Indeed, Allah is with the patient.” – 2:153
I have several reactions. One is amazement at how horrible the American government is, how awful their judicial system is. But I’ve been following these things for some time, and this story is not the first of its kind, just unfortunately one of the worst examples of how off track the US is.
Also, in the wake of the nine dead in the church shooting, and, amidst, the lack of any sensible action to curtail the proliferation of guns, what I find humorous in this case is how, in a country run by addled-brain gun fanatics that think the easy accessibility of lethal weapons should be a “right”, that a judge and jury would find that someone’s enthusiasm for guns would be evidence that are guilty of a crime worthy of life in prison. If a fondness for shooting birds is what got the Dukas into supermax, then there must be millions of whites who would be susceptible to the same inducements from America’s police, assuming the police wanted to go after whites in the same fashion.
I think the events in this story will only add to the hostility against the US, and as more people see the injustice, western governments in turn will have to amp up the injustice to control that reaction.
Take this guy in Canada for example, he went to jail because, in his opinion western governments shouldn’t be killing Muslims. If all the people who share his opinion were sent to jail, how crowded would the jails be?
– “Driver was arrested as he was walking to a bus stop just before 7 a.m. on June 4. He said an unmarked white van pulled up in the wrong lane and several armed officers surrounded him and took him away.
…”I think they were hoping that after arresting me they’d find something, you know, they’d find things on my hard drive or my phone,” he said.
“They probably think they’d find a gold mine and they didn’t, so I think that’s why I’m out right now and I’m not in jail.”
While in custody, Driver says he was interrogated by police on two separate occasions. Each session lasted between three or four hours and focused primarily on something he retweeted. He wouldn’t say specifically what the tweet said, but just that investigators appeared particularly interested in it.
When asked what would it take to change his views, he said, “for the West to stop killing Muslims, stop bombing, stop arresting Muslims … take responsibility for the crimes they’ve committed and just stay home and work on their own problems.””
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/aaron-driver-defends-isis-attack-on-parliament-but-denies-he-s-a-threat-1.3124815
Darn, I left out the best bit, this guy, Driver, even though he’s convicted of nothing, (there was no trial), is sentenced to “religious counselling”:
– “Shefman said the religious counselling requirement is puzzling.
“He could go to jail for failing to undertake religious activity. That doesn’t sound like Canada to me … that sounds like a theocracy,” said Shefman.”
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/isis-supporter-aaron-driver-s-rights-being-violated-winnipeg-lawyer-says-1.3116255
In the absence of any other signs of interest in gun control, the government’s turning of an illegal gun buy into life sentence worthy terrorism, is self evidently a sign of political persecution. And similarly, here we have words spoken to a journalist, hardly an uncommon practice, by someone who’s on bail for the crime of “retweeting”, being condemned as a crime by a government that is killing people in other countries with real bombs.
Political speech is the life blood of democracy, and as far in the spectrum as you can get from physical violence. If opposition to government foreign policy, or as Bezan calls it “making detestable comments”, is accepted as the police’s definition of “terrorism” then democracy in the western world has a bigger problem than defeating ISIS:
– “MP James Bezan wants Aaron Driver charged for inciting terrorism
James Bezan, Conservative MP for Selkirk-Interlake, and Canada’s parliamentary secretary of defence, said the 23-year-old Winnipeg-based ISIS supporter made detestable comments in an interview.
“I believe that he should be charged again for promoting attacks against Canadian members of the armed forces, as well as against our police officers,” Bezan said.”
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/mp-james-bezan-wants-aaron-driver-charged-for-inciting-terrorism-1.3127204
Canadian conservatives love trailing along their American counterparts in the most inept ways. Many of the terror cases there (while fewer in number, pre-Bill C51 at least) are even more outrageous.
Fort Dix AGAIN? The old among us well remember the alleged plot of the Weathermen to set off bombs at a dance planned at Fort Dix in 1970. The Weathermen had NEVER before targeted PEOPLE to be killed – just bombs going off at places where people were at OTHER times.
For my part, I’ve decided it was a frame-up concocted by prosecutors, to which various indicted parties copped pleas in order to win leniency. Not unlike the Nuremberg and other war-crimes “trials.”
Sure, THEY gassed ’em. Yup, millions of ’em.
It’s been pretty clear for some time that mere ownership of firearms, Second Amendment or not, can be used as an excuse to either arrest or kill anyone if an authority wants to do so, regardless of innocence. They not only no longer serve any purpose, despite what the Constitution says, but are a hazard to simply possess. Even the allegation of possession, even if untrue, is sufficient. Although this is the least defensible of the Bill of Rights, it is indicative of how all its amendments have been suspended by encirclement of other laws, regulations and orders.
From historical experience, we know that suspension of rights occurs for at least as long as a particular war endures. Unfortunately, we have embarked on a course of perpetual war, so this suspension will not be ending anytime soon.
The practical lesson is that in the end, only the way of peace as taught by Jesus offers real protection for all our rights.
The practical lesson is that in the end, only the way of peace as taught by Jesus offers real protection for all our rights.
I’m sorry, but can you offer some concrete evidence that the above statement is true please? Because there is plenty of evidence that the exact opposite is, in fact, the truth:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_and_violence
While it is true that there have been pacifist strains of worship woven throughout the history of Christianity, I think it can be said, firmly and accurately, that Christianity has a solid grounding of evidence that it is no better than any other religion when it comes to the application of violence to achieve its goals.
Not looking to burst anyone’s bubble but religion is all made up. There are some good messages buried in it but it’s purpose is to calm the masses.
Onward Christian soldiers …
While various elites may regard religion that way, religion arises in every human culture, including the most egalitarian. The religious impulse comes from the human desire for explanations, including for death and suffering. How did it all get here? Why are we here? Why am *I here? What does it all mean?
“religion is the opiate of the people”
I agree Mona. It’s humanity’s attempt to understand things that are beyond our reach. To deal with fears with which we have no other, more rational, recourse.
Of course, these days we have ways of knowing that actually work, which is probably why religion is falling out of favor.
You are conflating ‘religious impulse’ with ‘religion.’ I deserve better scholarship for my federal tax dollars, “Mona.”
Jose to many people who believe in religion, advanced science is generally indifferentiable from magic — most people can’t *understand* the ‘explanations’ even if they exist. People don’t just want to know there are explanations if they can’t comprehend them, and if they CAN’T comprehend them they generally want to believe it is because it isn’t something that is within the grasp of comprehension.
Not looking to burst anyone’s bubble but religion is all made up.
It’s ok. I don’t have that particular bubble. It departed me at the age of five when I began to realize that the church/religion my grandparents followed so profoundly did not extend it’s philosophy of “God loving everyone equally” to black people. I may not have understood all the nuances, but I was aware enough even at that age to know there was something wrong with exclusions like that.
Sounds a bit like the muzzy definition of what an ‘American Person’ is. Or what an ‘anyone’ constitutes.
I really disagree, nuf said; I think that religion is our way of connecting to The Divine, Our Creator (however the faith expresses it) and I for one, believe in that. I think Mona’s reply hits on a good theme…
And yes, sadly, Pedinska, Christianity has done some abuses, yes, even violent ones. Attacks on abortion clinics anger and sadden me – and I’m Christian. I’m also saddened by homophobia and Islamophobia some Christians have been known to spout. But please be aware also, that not all Christians share those views.
I can’t speak for Sojourner Truth for sure, but maybe what she was getting at and hoping for was the Peaceful message of Jesus…. and this passage comes to mind:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Philippians+4:7&version=KJV
Although I am Christian, I really admire The Dalai Lama. He has been known to say that we don’t all like the same flavor of ice cream, so why should be all adhere to the same faith? His Holiness is definitely on a higher spiritual plane than I am.
What saddens me is that so many use faith to persecute those of other faiths. We should do better than that.
Even if they did know about it and were planning it, it is still somewhat disturbing that they could be convicted based on almost no evidence.
If they were under FBI surveillance for years, why wasn’t there any evidence other than someone else saying that they were in on it? Why didn’t the judge toss this case at trial based on there being no evidence?
Alerted by a clerk in the post 9/11 era of over-hyped “See something, say something” (related to the NSA spying on all Americans), an innocent vacation video triggered Part A: 1. FBI brands these guys terrorists, 2. the FBI prepares a script to prove they are terrorists, 3. the FBI selects the cast, 4. the FBI produces the necessary dialogue to be used by its cast members to achieve the desired results, and 5. the FBI produces locations, meetings, equipment, settings, tools, and props required to convey the legitimacy of their cast.
Part B ensues when the selected cast fails to produce necessary progress and the FBI, being motivated by this embarrassment and the money and time spent, redoubles its determination to prove these are bona fide terrorists on American soil: 1. The FBI makes a script change to create a parallel story to lure its targets, 2. the FBI brings in a new cast member, a more convincing catalyst, to manipulate the targets over the line, 3. the targets, believing the FBI’s cast member, commit an illegal act, and 4. the FBI pounces and has their bona fide terrorists.
Epilogue: the FBI has these guys on conspired gun law violations, used FBI conjured evidence and faux experts to play on the jurors sensitivities in front of a light weight judge. The outcome was never in doubt. American law has been gerrymandered to allow spoofing jurists, people into prison and others to vote for undeserving individuals seeking high political office. Today, the prize winner of the FBI’s conspiracy to create terrorists and send them away for life is none other than Chris Christie who appears to be involved in several corrupt activities.
Great interview on Democracy NOW! this morning, Mr. Hussain. It was unsurprising though to hear the ex-FBI guy and author of “Thinking Like a Terrorist” suggest such integrity problems as this, completely setting people up with questionable informants and kangaroo-prosecutions to justify their agency’s existence, have only existed the last decade or so. I kept trying to tell him through my monitor – maybe his next book should be, “Thinking Like the Corrupt FBI.”
Crazy. Good investigation and writing. Government is out of control.
The real problem with Muslims is that there are just too many treacherous people like Omar and Bakalli among them, due to which the rest of the good people get a bad name of manipulating the justice delivery system. All the Guantanamo prisoners were caught by Packee bounty hunters and most of them were innocent people embellished as terror masters in order to collect awards. Throughout their treacherous history Muslims have sold their own kith and kins for money and gold. I am wondering if Allah did not tell Muhammed not to betray people belonging to his own religion.
You don’t think the problem is the US paying bounty hunters without bothering to check what they’re bringing in?
Do you really believe that if the FBI paid a ‘Christian’ miscreant to do the same dirty work of trolling some white guy to do a shoot-up in a church that it wouldn’t work? That the miscreant would refuse: “Oh, no officer, I couldn’t possibly do that, especially not for all those juicy green-backs, not me sir. Please just send me to prison instead”.
Tragic.
Muslims are having cut-throat competition to out-sell each other. Who is to blame for this?
Zero evidence that this is unique to the Muslim population. The most likely explanation is that the FBI is working hard to produce informants in Muslim communities. It’s really a widespread effort to dispose of Muslims who are political and adversarial, also those who are mentally unstable and could potentially be radicalized.
The problem isn’t that FBI has to “work hard” to find Muslim informants. The problem is that they have to “hardly work” to get hundred of willing Muslims who would sell their own parents let alone anybody else in their community. As long as Allah doesn’t ban such behavior Muslims are bound to get kicked around or their heads chopped off.
Before ‘the Muslims’ were targets, the ATF was quite set on going after ‘non-Muslims’. Ruby Ridge, for example. Just not as often, yet. One would assume that given the progression of things, if it hadn’t been Muslims, it’d be someone else. Technology tends to make people seek out uses for it.
If the person was my friend, and I went to shooting ranges all the time, I don’t see why not. And while that is illegal, it is in no way or form a “terror plot”.
It’s amazing what inference a prosecutor can draw, or invite a jury to draw. If we can tell the latter, “…Thus, to determine a particular defendant’s state of mind at a particular time, you may consider evidence about what the defendant said, what he did and failed to do …”, anything is possible. The detention of over 100,000 American citizens was justified all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, at least in part, precisely because the Nisei had carried out no acts of sabotage.
A variant on the logic, “Well, that just proves how devious their planning is,” a quote attributed to the U.S. commander on the Pacific coast, and, among others, Earl Warren.
So it seems that the proof of conspiracy is the attempt to buy guns. This sort of defense or excuse–that you were entrapped or induced by a government agents–look into your own conscience. Could an agent induce you to purchase assault weapons? Spending your hard-earned money, and you being a devoted family man?
It seems like there were 2 pieces of evidence against the brothers. 1) that they attempted to buy guns illegally. 2) that Shnewer made a statement that the brothers knew about it.
Yes the brothers bought the guns illegally. But that is a relatively minor offense if not connected to the terrorism plot. If the government did not have evidence that the brothers were in on the Fort Dix conspiracy, then the brothers should have only been convicted of the illegal gun charges.
From the FBI’s perspective they probably felt that they had to move forward as soon as they acquired the guns since at that point there was the possibility that the guns (that they supplied) could be used to commit a crime. But the judge had a responsibility to toss the terrorism aspect of the case against the brothers since there was virtually no evidence.