It’s been a suspected death beam, a secret tool to control the weather and even a weapon to manipulate the human mind. Now, the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, better known by its acronym, HAARP, has reached the final stage of its strange journey that began with Cold War concerns about nuclear war: Next month, the Alaska-based research station will be transferred to civilian control.
HAARP will be handed over in August to the University of Alaska, confirmed Othana Zuch, an Air Force spokesperson. A ceremony for the handover is also scheduled for that month.
“The Air Force Research Lab has control of the HAARP facility until Aug. 11,” Marmian Grimes, a university of spokesperson, wrote in an email to The Intercept. “After that, the university will have access to the site under the terms of an agreement between [University of Alaska Fairbanks] and the Air Force. That agreement allows access for two years, which will provide the university and the Air Force time to negotiate an agreement regarding the transfer of the land.”
Located on a site near the town of Gakona, Alaska, HAARP consists of 360 radio transmitters and 180 antennas, which are used to generate radio waves that heat up the ionosphere by accelerating electrons, allowing scientists to conduct experiments.
When it was first conceived during the Cold War, HAARP was going to study whether currents of charged particles traveling through the ionosphere, a region of the upper atmosphere, could be used to transmit messages to nuclear submarines lurking deep underwater. When the Cold War ended, HAARP supporters offered up other uses, like examining ways to detect underground facilities in countries like North Korea.
In 2002, the Pentagon grew interested in using HAARP to study ways to counter high-altitude nuclear detonations. That plan, too, eventually fell to the wayside, and funding dried up.
The Defense Department spent almost $300 million — most of it provided through congressional add-ons — over two decades to build the site, which was finally completed in 2007. Less than seven years later, the Air Force announced it would close and dismantle it.
Given its seeming esoteric goal — studying the ionosphere — the facility received outsized attention from those who believed it is a classified military facility. Over the years, HAARP strove to break free of the conspiracy theories that surrounded it, even holding annual open houses for the public to allow people to view the facility.
It didn’t work, and the conspiracy theories continued, including allegations that HAARP was the cause of the massive 2010 earthquake that devastated Haiti.
Last summer, the Air Force announced that it was getting ready to dismantle HAARP. The facility’s most obvious application — as a tool for scientists to study the ionosphere — wasn’t enough to attract federal funding.
Physicist Dennis Papadopoulos, a professor at the University of Maryland and longtime proponent of HAARP, said the agreement that was worked out would transfer the facility from the Defense Department to the state of Alaska, and then over to the University of Alaska, which has long been involved in research at the site.
HAARP will then operate, like other ionosphere research sites, as a scientific facility supported by those conducting experiments there. Papadopoulos said that the state of Alaska will put in about $2 million, and some additional funding may come from the National Science Foundation and the Pentagon.
The facility has been dormant this summer, and Papadopoulos doesn’t expect it to be operational until next spring, because of Alaska’s harsh winter.
“The most important thing is the transfer,” he said, “and that is happening in August.”
Photo: Mark Farmer/AP
* This article has been updated with a statement from the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.
Because cell towers.
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/cells.html
70% of the UAF Cray Time is DoD. That should be enough to give you a clue. At the same time, UAF is one of the best CS/Engineering/Visualization/Mining/CSForensics Universities in the US. Data can be received there where it cannot be anywhere else in the world, and the math/cs department is known for winning the mathematics in modeling competition three times in a row, more than berkeley, mit and one more, but I forget which, in england. (that is a quote from data accurate in 99.) Seriously want your child to get a Good, Education.. Send them to UAF <– Fairbanks Campus. It's regionally accredited, and 1/10th of what you'd spend on a university of the same caliber for computer science.
Indeed.
This article reads like propaganda – since when has the military told the truth about anything to the public, let alone about a facility that cost millions to build? There is a reason this is coming forward now. As for “dormant”, don’t be so sure of that. And Alaska’s harsh winters? Alaska has been suffering from the effects of warming to unprecedented degrees.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/haarp-still-stands-geoengineers-still-wreaking-havoc/
Hi Cori –
You know I had the same feeling reading the article. Didn’t seem to be much if any journalistic skepticism evident – and doesn’t TI preach that???
Will have to do more reading about this…
Useful Idiots:
You would appreciate his comment. The best comparison he can make is to monsters that do not exist. How appropriate!
Actually my real comparison, if you’d read my comment fully, was to toxicology. See Paracelsus. Or the Latin adage, “Sola dosis facit venenum.”
Fine Line’s Bass Master handed over their stinky biosphere to our uni for disposal. Way to blow through 200 million, too! What a ecological nightmare! Who’s gonna keep those windows clean? On the outside, it’s alkali dust for deserted miles. Inside, the solar powered chlorophyll buildup is beyond Kaboom’s power. Better not to lock a bunch of monkeys in there without an escape plan, money guns.
If it could cause earthquakes, Congress would be all over that fracking thing for funding. Ya’ll know we fracked for NG with nukes a few times in the Southwest, Operation Plowshare. Those cracks are what’s spilling all that methane over the Colorado Plateau, canaries. Way to blow, Air Force.
Actually the New Yorker recently ran a decent article on that, abbadabba.
So by giving it to a university the threat is gone?
Sure, how about MIT’s Lincoln Labs or Johns Hopkins’ Applied Physics Lab? Although, both are already defense contractors…
Even better! The “threat” never existed in the first place and still doesn’t! I mean, I suppose you could walk past as one of those antennas falls over and get hurt, but that’s about it.
Just more proof of the following :
“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.”
Benito Mussolini
I’m still looking for material on the 1916 parade bombing and the subsequent mystery as to who dunnit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preparedness_Day_Bombing
Meantime, there’s still the USS Maine matter.
– – –
The PBS NewsHour is brought to you by the Gilded Age; by Carnegie Steel; by Mark Hanna & Co., a public-relations firm for the 19th Century; and by viewers like you! Thank you!
JEFFREY BROWN: … the aftermath of the USS Maine explosion. For analysis we have David Brooks, columnist for the New York Times, and Mark Shields, syndicated columnist. Welcome, gentlemen.
DAVID BROOKS: Thank you.
JEFFREY: So, the Sampson inquiry found that the Maine was sunk by a submarine mine. This is a big deal, don’t you think?
MARK SHIELDS: Very big deal, Jeff. At least two Obama Administration sources tell me that they knew it was sabotage from the start.
JEFFREY: David?
DAVID: Well, the Spaniards did do their own inquiry, the Del Perel-De Salas investigation by their navy, which said it was coal dust. Internal explosion.
JEFFREY: There was nothing on that in the Hearst or Pulitzer press. Not the day of the explosion, not since.
DAVID: I wonder why?
MARK: Aw, c’mon, David, you’re going to take the Spaniards’ word over our Navy’s? And the Maine was the latest word in U.S. naval technology. Ships like that don’t just blow up over a handful of coal dust. And 274 of our innocent sailors are dead. Someone’s got to answer for that.
JEFFREY: What about the press reaction?
DAVID: The yellow press has been baying for war over Cuba for several years now, especially Hearst. And Pulitzer. Now they’ve got their war.
MARK: “Baying?”
DAVID: Baying. Remember when Hearst sent the artist Frederic Remington to cover the Cuban rebellion? Remington telegraphed back saying he couldn’t find anything inflammatory enough, and Hearst cables back, “You furnish the pictures and I’ll furnish the war.” Next thing we get drawings of an American woman being strip-searched by Spanish customs officers. Turns out later the inspectors were women, not the men Remington pictured. By then the whole USA had gotten an eyeful.
MARK: Well, it was shocking.
JEFFREY: Well, it is the Victorian era. How often do you see naked ladies in newsprint?
DAVID: Anyway, now we have the USS Maine explosion.
MARK: Yes. Mr. Obama’s not going to be able to hold back the war effort now. Teddy Roosevelt said the President “doesn’t have the spine of a chocolate éclair.” Just watch, this outrage is the final straw. The Spaniards blew up one of our largest warships! In their harbor!
DAVID: Leaping to conclusions.
MARK: C’mon.
DAVID: And now we’re going to rush to war and just watch: a hundred years from now, they’ll say it was a mistake. At least it’s not Britain: we almost got in a war with them three years ago over Venezuela, remember? All the ballyhoo for war was as loud as this, and yet it came to nothing. Now, here we are in 1898, and Mr. Obama’s foreign policy is being driven by the war hawks.
JEFFREY: Speaking of hawks, environmental scientists express concern about the future of the passenger pigeon. For that story here’s Fred de San Lazaro in Des Moines …
* * *
…after that, it is firm: Have my baby….
Re: Mike Sulzer – 13 Jul 2015 at 1:11 pm
And, thank you Mike for your informative and reasonable comments.
Indeed there are some who prefer to allow facts to determine valid theory, and others who prefer to fashion facts around imagined preconceived conclusions; the latter, of course, while it manifests itself sometimes as the sophistry of propaganda, more often simply manifests as fictional entertainment for those seeking a diversion from a fear-ridden or idle reality.
Re: Benito Mussolini
Your satire made my day….Thanx
“Work is love made visible.” KG
As Usual,
EA
There’s also this, under proposed military technology.
http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/tech/2015/07/09/handgun-system-solicitation-hollowpoint/29886907/
Some technologies turn out to not have significant military application and therefore, unfortunately, must be turned over to civilians.
It is true the facility could be used to induce earthquakes. But the target was Cuba, not Haiti. It was decided that missing by 400 miles was not good enough, even for the purpose of targeting civilians.
It’s also true that the transmissions could be used to control the weather. But in every case, it simply led to further global warming. Eventually even the military was forced to concede that making the entire planet uninhabitable would be, at best, a pyrrhic victory.
The transmissions did show a great deal of promise in the field of mind control. But the subjects completely lost their autonomy. As a result, the controllers had to provide instructions for even the most mundane tasks. It was incredibly difficult to even induce a subject to walk several feet; the controller had to give explicit commands to the subject on where to position their feet, legs, torso and arms, as well as the exact sequence in which they should move. In the words of one controller, “it would be easier if I just did this myself”.
Using the facility to induce pain initially seemed more promising. But the CIA’s waterboarders affiliate clearly had jurisdiction under the collective bargaining agreement. They opted to protect their own jobs by nixing the new technology.
So…good only for civilians.
Duce, if any US military operation was going to induce an earthquake, it was Operation Cannikin in 1971, which involved a 5MT underground test on a known major earthquake fault.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannikin
They certainly made the effort, though.
The Military did create earthquakes when it tunneling up the West for Deep Underground Military Bunkers.
http://projectcamelot.org/underground_bases.html
They could consult with the frackers:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/08/us/new-research-links-scores-of-earthquakes-to-fracking-wells-near-a-fault-in-ohio.html
If we could only increase the globull temp. by about 10 degrees we could open up the great north and Siberia for human population and agriculture!
NO DOWNSIDE!
We could flood places like Miami, New Orleans, NYC, SFO, Boston & hopefully even WDC!
I don’t claim to know anything about this, but so far there are a few bits I’d like to see sorted out.
* Is this document http://www.bariumblues.com/haarp_executive_summary.htm real? In particular, the desire to have power > 1 gigawatt, and the claim that HAARP can “deplete” regions of the van Allen belts of charged particles?
* Charged particles from the far upper atmosphere are occasionally somehow linked with thunderstorms. Is there a cause and effect relationship? (I *think* so)
* How broad a region of ionospheric turbulence can HAARP create?
* When you look at the map at www*theguardian*com/environment/2015/jun/04/global-warming-hasnt-paused-study-finds (sorry, I have to munge any but the first address or I don’t think this will ever post) there is a huge cold spot over the eastern US, which is directly downwind of the “laminar flow” jetstream over the HAARP site in Alaska that has been keeping the region so darned cold while the whole rest of the world gets warmer.
* Therefore, can HAARP actually be used to incite turbulence and storms in some pattern that influences whether the jet stream from southern Alaska veers south or not?
I discount all the crazy stuff about earthquakes in Haiti as being beyond batshit insane – they sound so much like a classic disinformation campaign that they actually have increased my suspicion about conspiracy theories I used to think were far-fetched. But there’s a huge energy payoff to be had by keeping Washington thinking like climate change is all theory and not real, which is what could happen when the city sits under the world’s biggest cold spot.
The document is entirely real and completely sensible. There is a need to understand what 1 GW means. it means that if HAARP transmitted equal power in all directions, it would take 1 GW to achieve what it does in a narrow beam over head. It has a power of about 3.6 mega watts (MW), concentrated in a narrow beam a few degrees wide. The total power is negligible compared to natural geophysical processes.
Removing charged particles from the magnetosphere is a possibility. Suppose someone sets off a number of nuclear bombs in space. So many charged particles are created that satellites would be harmed. Some way would be required to remove the particles, which otherwise can remain for years, preventing communication, etc.
Cosmic rays might trigger lightning, I do not know. We are talking about electrons and protons of lower energy moving along the B field lines, something very different.
The plasma turbulence created in the ionosphere occurs inside the beam near the height where the wave reflects. The beam is a few degrees wide, and so the area is small.
The density in ionospheric regions is very low compared to the density down here. (Remember, the atmosphere decreases exponentially with height, that is very fast.) Furthermore, the density of the plasma is some fraction of the total atmosphere. The amount of energy required to create plasma up there is very small compared to levels required down here. Plasma (ionospheric) turbulence has no significance for down here.
HAARP does not modify the weather. Even if it could, its budget was never large enough to run all the time. It was (and will be) run occasionally for research purposes.
Actually, I think you may be right. They were heating and lifting the upper atmosphere hundreds of miles up into space as part of attempting to create a space shield, when they discovered that it was affecting weather patterns. The high powered masers bit was part of something else. I must have conflated them for some reason.
No, HAARP cannot do that.
Yes it can. The idea comes from physics. In physics they have something called a Cloud Chamber. It is used to detect tiny particles in a relatively large volume. Particles moving through a cloud chamber leave light traces. In a similar fashion missiles moving through a charged plasma would also leave traces of light. This allows for a “passive” means of tracing incoming warheads, which can then be targeted with…wait for it…High Powered Masers.
The lifting of the upper atmosphere affects weather patterns in several ways. The most direct way being the creation of relative low pressure areas. Weather systems tend to develop along high and low pressure ridges. With advanced computer models you can predict and therefore manipulate weather patterns by creating high and low pressure areas.
You see? They really are particularly clever Mad Scientists.
Sidebar: we need only wait till Wednesday for the next secret military operation, Jade Helm 15.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/13/jade-helm-texas-monitor-military-training-government-plot
While the military may say (and maybe even mean) that they do not intend for it to spur something, I can virtually guarantee something truly terrible is going to happen during and/or as a result of Jade Helm. Just intuition. If it doesn’t, I’ll be greatly surprised. Any takers?
Let’s just say that Wednesday’s forecast for Texas has a possibility of banana showers.
http://crooksandliars.com/2015/07/three-days-and-counting
You know, if someone had told me decades ago that I’d grow up wanting to tell governments to ‘just grow up’… I’d have chosen to live a very different life.
Good luck in semi-situ, Coram.
“Now listen to me closely I’ll endeavor to explain
What separates a charlatan from a Charlemagne
A rule confessed by generals illustrious and various
Though pompous as a Pompey or daring as a Darius
A simple rule that every good man knows by heart
It’s smarter to be lucky than it’s lucky to be smart
And if the fates feel frivolous
And all our plans they smother
Well suppose this war does shrivel us
There’ll always be another!”
(Pippin, the musical)
Indeed — a ht to your love of theatre. :)
You are killing me! You need to either become a stand-up comedian or go to work for the POTUS! Your logic is way too spot on!
Gut feelings can in my opinion be as good as data. Tick tock tick tock ,just imagine all the six billion eaters going about their daily cycle,all the food,water,electricity used.? So from the view of the Puppeteer,or the owner of all these puppies,the utterance ‘enough is enough’ will occur and then things will happen. If a military assault or practice occurs on the streets of America regardless of where it begins,this will be a new chapter and with it nothing to compare it to. This roundup of either dissidents or everyone has been studied and will be studied further,after the fact. Texas in July,New York in August.
My question is, what would be the desired outcome? Is there some faction of the government who fully desires to just keep pressing on the wound until the patient kicks? One must assume there must be (not in any organised way, per se — but if there’s anything the recent barage of zombie/apocalypse stories have told us, it’s that some people want to see it all burn just so they can prove they can survive and come out on top (I tend to doubt they would)). Alternately, would it just be a matter of opportunism, or what might seem like some in the military as a forced play of hand? Best to assume, probably, a combination of all of these, as well as some who actually do have the interests of the public at heart (but who cannot succeed because they’re limited by ethics, humanitarianism and/or morality while the other parties aren’t).
Something about powder kegs, though, I guess.
Meandering mode off.
(Adding, my gut says not before mid- or even late-August — but I have no data, and generally I prefer informed gut to just gut. Gut alone tends to just let us reinforce our own preconceptions; dangerous.)
JH is preparation for something that will happen within about a year!
My youngest son [20] has a best friend whose uncle is COO for a top 10 us bank. The uncle has moved parents & grandparents out of the US to central Europe & has told the rest of the family to GET OUT of the USA, FAST!
He has told the family [in his position he deals with the big rich] that billionaires are getting out of the country OR building themselves “SAFE” areas!
There is your answer. The US will collapse within about 12 months!
Collapses aren’t immediate like that.
Collapses are gut-wrenching, often starting quickly, with shock tactics, then settling into long-term fighting and civil war either culminating in collapse, ekeing out a recovery, or merely continuing forever. More a Ukraine scenario than Doomsday. Haves, have-nots. Anger. Poverty. Riots. Overwrought response, involve the military, etc.
That’s not collapse, though — that’s a lead-up to one.
As for financials… going to Europe probably isn’t going to be doing em much good considering the impact the dollar and Euro have on the euro and the dollar (and every other currency, but some more than others), respectively. Thinking you can run away from something like a US collapse is wishful thinking. Everybody’d be put through the wringer except for, ironically, countries which have largely cut themselves off from relying on other countries for their food, etc. This isn’t a case of Russians running off to Cyprus to get their money out of banks before the Great Haircut a couple years back — nor anything like getting money out of Greece.
Also just remember — if you leave a country, you take your country and its country’s bullshit with you — all of it. Look at the current migration issues in Central and Eastern Europe and the steady working West for more on this. Prejudice is alive and well, and if you think it wouldn’t be applied to rich Americans, when their economy would wind up more or less crushing other economies when the US’s crashed… Well, I don’t know what to say about that.
Leaving a country and making an outpost in another country purely out of greed and self-preservation when you’re one of the top whatever point whatever percent and contributed to the entire debacle — well that’s just rude and resembles colonisation, doesn’t it?
Microwaves can heat water causing super heated air to expand rapidly and/or rise. We are talking about billions of watts of microwave energy beamed into the atmosphere. It is possible to increase/decrease the energy of storms as well as steer them. This installation is well positioned to manipulate the Jet Stream. There are other, similar facilities around the world. International laws prohibits weather weapons…internationally. Some think it may have been linked to a Global Warming Hoax.
On 9/11 2001 a large hurricane, Erin, approached New York, paused for about 24 hours then departed virtually unremarked. Also the earth’s Magnetic field dipped in a strange and unexplained manner.
Heard anything about the Active Denial systems of late?
No. Not lately. It was supposed to be used for crowd control, but protestors started coating umbrellas with aluminum foil which caused problems, like putting aluminum foil in a microwave.
http://www.bloomberg.com/ss/09/03/0306_deadliest_tech/16.htm
Conspiracy theory?
ADS exists. Read “The E-Bomb”, by Dr. Doug Beason, Ph. D., Physics, a retired Airforce Research Scientist who worked at Los Alamos and other top line military research facilities around the country. He helped developed these weapons systems whose functional core is a gyrotron, a form guided and controlled electromagnetic energy.
In 2010, my head was broiled with this weapons system 24/7 for nearly a year. I carried around on my head, Ziploc bags filled with ice to offset the heat. At night, I slept on a bed of ice, from waist up and had my head surrounded by ice in Ziploc bags. The cold itself created its own miseries. A once trusted dermatologist told me that I was delusional when I sought help. He had two training interns with him. When I told him that there was nothing wrong with my cognitive faculties, he insisted that I needed to see a psychiatrist.
At this point, I opened my bag and yanked out a ton of professional literature, including articles about Raytheon and how Russia used the technology to treat skin cancers occurring at certain depth levels of the skin (and he is a dermatologist, you’d think he’d have known). He read one of the articles and then said that he plans to consult with his military dermatologist friend. I asked if he still wanted me to see a psychiatrist. He has yet to reply.
I ended up in an emergency room where a young psychiatrist met with me. He chatted with me briefly, I presumed, to assess if I was “crazy”. And then, in his hands was a pile of documentation of the torture and a pile of research papers on the technologies. And images of the devices.
His eyes bulged out as he read the stuff. Then he said “People should know about this!” Later, I saw him consulting with a bunch of men at a distance from where I was. When he came back he had suddenly changed his position: “You have made up this whole thing.” They had obviously threatened him by destroying his career if he did not co-operate. This is how Dr Arrigo a well-renowned military psychologist who opposes torture argues that torture destroys the society from within, by co-opting professions such as medicine, law, etc. And that the practitioners and proponents of torture offer no remedies to how they plan to stitch a democracy back together again after they have destroyed it, as they are systematically doing now.
The complaints by deniers of the abuses, have always been tagged “conspiracy theories”. XKEYSTROKE, for example, used to suck up vast digital online data would have been just another “conspiracy theory” tale had there been no conscientious Edward Snowden. Just like HAARP and mind control. But read Dr. Nick Begich on HAARP.
I don’t mean these questions to mock you. I wanted to say that first off. But I do need to ask:
“Ziploc bags filled with ice to offset the heat. At night, I slept on a bed of ice, from waist up and had my head surrounded by ice in Ziploc bags.”
(1) How do you get all that ice? Do you just have a big ice machine? Or do you buy bags? They generally will melt given human body heat, so I’m not sure how it’d survive a full night’s sleep — and either way…
(2) If you slept on a bed of ice, generally speaking, combined with the lowered core temperature that comes with sleep itself, wouldn’t you be dead of hypothermia by now?
Either way, I’d imagine that investing in that much ice (or power/water/machinery) must get expensive? If I might make a suggestion, what about just getting some of those snap packs, so you can reuse them each night.
[There’s no such thing as ‘XKEYSTROKE’ btw. I wish your superiours would at least let you read the source of the materiels you guys have to comment on. It must make your jobs really difficult since you have to maintain clearance; I don’t think I’d want to work in an environment that frustrating.]
(Sorry)
Are you implying that the existence and purpose of this system is a ‘conspiracy theory’?
http://defense-update.com/products/a/ads.htm
http://www.bloomberg.com/ss/09/03/0306_deadliest_tech/16.htm
I am stating, not implying, that (A) the system exists and (B) the military put out publicity — video of field exercises — indicating that crowd control was a purpose for it.
Well, bullshit, but never mind, this HAARP transmits HF frequencies, not microwaves. HF frequencies penetrate into the ionosphere, and then can reflect when the plasma frequency is equal to the wave frequency. They can interact with the plasma in that region. It does not heat water or super heat air. It does not change the weather. It just creates interesting effects in a plasma that some scientists find useful to study.
Cell phones can cause brain tumors and other tumors. You shouldn’t wear them close to your skin. or leave them on your ear. You indemnify the company against lawsuits as part of your contract it’s buried in the user agreement in your cell phone,or used to be.
A 60 watt radar range easily can boil water and pop corn. It might be 3 mega watts continuous power maybe, but you could get much more power in burst or shot term transmissions. If this research isn’t secret, why isn’t it public? Where are the successful results or the failures? Lists of accomplishments an experiments? Dates, Data etc.
What are these mysterious plasma effects of which you speak? Maybe we all would find them interesting and since it is our tax dollars…
Perhaps you do not know what to look for. I will mention just one link, http://vlf.stanford.edu/research/experiments-haarp-ionospheric-heater, in which a group of Stanford graduate students explain what they do and there is a list of some Stanford papers at the end. They are just one of several academic groups which have used the facility.
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/D7.html:
HAARP has 360 transmitters, each with 10KW, or 10,000 watts, which can be written as 1 x 10^4 watts (1.e04 watts). Thus HAARP generates 3.6 Mw or 3.6 x 10^6 watts. A hurricane is 1.8 x 10^8 times more powerful than HAARP, that is almost 200 million times more powerful. On an energy basis alone, hurricanes do not get affected by HAARP, not that HF radio waves have any effect on a hurricane even at much greater powers..
(aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/D7)
HAARP has 360 transmitters, each with 10KW, or 10,000 watts, which can be written as 1 x 10^4 watts (1.e04 watts). Thus HAARP generates 3.6 Mw or 3.6 x 10^6 watts. A hurricane is 1.8 x 10^8 times more powerful than HAARP, that is almost 200 million times more powerful. On an energy basis alone, hurricanes do not get affected by HAARP, not that HF radio waves have any effect on a hurricane even at much greater powers..
Maybe. But you may be familiar with the concept of the transistor. A small amount of energy applied to the gate can control a much larger amount of energy at the collector. The issue is one of controlling power not generating power.
If they did these experiments they were evil geniuses, if they didn’t, they were incompetent morons. Either it was our tax dollars at work.
Another thing, they say it was turned over to civilians, but the CIA is supposedly a civilian agency. Not much comfort there.
Vacuum tubes, transistors, etc., share one important characteristic: they are amplifiers that were developed based on recently understood physics, practical applications of real science. There is no physical mechanism by which radio waves control the energy of hurricanes outside of the imagination of people such as you.
Actually there is. If you know how hurricanes start, do you then know how to start a hurricane? What if I start a hurricane 200 miles west of where it would have started naturally? Have I “controlled” the hurricane. In this case the “amplification” comes from the “chaotic” nature of weather patterns, the so-called butterfly effect. By controlling the genesis of the storm one could “control” at least somewhat its path.
Some things are too important to be left up to God.
Sharon, won’t this wind up just getting funded largely by the DOD by proxy (ie will most of the researchers be getting their money from the federal government anyway)? Well, that or defense contractors?
A lot of programs like this have been privatised to remove accountability… While I’ve no interest in overstating ‘threats’ viz HAARP (I’ve had the misfortune of seeing some of the less reputable statements, not that all of HAARP is safe), I do find the financial restructuring to be curious. Especially since UA is a public university. Why is the state of Alaska putting in 2 million (in addition to the costs that the university itself will incur) for this? I guess I’m wondering if this isn’t just a way to privatise some of the same research to reduce transparency and open research up to (defense) contractors as well?
The DOD doesn’t sink hundreds of millions of dollars into any tech on a continuing basis without having *any* intent on using it for some military purpose. That doesn’t make the conspiracy theories true, but it also doesn’t explain some of the stranger things that have come out of that program, either.
Mostly I’m just curious about the funding.
You do realize that a certain former senator from Alaska, whose last name began with S, had a lot to do with getting the funding for his state, right? It is just radio waves, for Christ’s sake. Get them into a plasma (what the ionosphere is) and interesting things happen. if you are worried about what radio haves do to people, stop using your cell phone. It is low power, but the square of distance matters.
That’s not what I’m really worried about, although to be fair there’s been a whole lot of statistics gaming attempting to try to disprove the existence of cancer clusters in certain locations — and I generally believe that’s on purpose. But then I also believe people may not be studying the right thing, too. Some people are indeed more sensitive to certain frequencies than others (and I don’t mean in a kooky way). Certain people have in fact been tested to show irregular sleep study results in areas with moderate to high RF in the immediate vicinity, for instance.
Just because we don’t have all the answers yet doesn’t mean things are necessarily safe; that’s what research USED to be about: testing in labs before testing in the real world. Frankly right now we’re test-casing so much it’d be disingenuous to believe something we’re doing won’t have grossly negative effects (GMO, wireless comms over large ranges, wireless charging, splicing organisms, nanomaterials, etc). All negative effects don’t have to be ‘apocalyptic’ to be things you’d want to avoid. And it never bodes well for us to try to manipulate the fact that ecosystems evolve in tandem for a reason. Weather patterns, ionic charging, etc can all have behavioural effects on a small scale that might have amplified results in a negative sense. Can you say for sure they don’t? More specifically, does it ever harm anybody to practice science with caution?
Incidentally HAARP isn’t ‘just radio waves’.
Of course it is. What else could it possibly be? It is radio transmitters and antennas, big generators to provide the power, and a control room with computers and people to make it work.
Saying HAARP is ‘just radio waves’ that off-hand is like saying Godzilla is ‘just a lizard’ or King Kong ‘just a primate’.
Things don’t scale in some areas quite the same way as they do in others. Take poisons/toxicology.
For your consideration, I actually saved this video link the day I saw it – I believe on 12/28/2012:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAYFGrpRmRU&feature=uploademail&fb_source=message
I don’t like things too coincidental, particularly if pointed out to me ahead of time. A later story about that coincidence:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/deadly-march-tornadoes-were-firest-billion-dollar-disaster-of-2012/
Draw your own conclusions…
Sorry, don’t click links.
Apologies I fat-fingered the date of “2/28/2012,” the day after the video was originally posted.
The funding is one point of interest; the fact that a program is with a university or defense contractor doesn’t make it any less military or hush-hush either. This, for example:
http://www.contracostatimes.com/contra-costa-times/ci_27119179/lawrence-livermore-lab-test-plutonium-using-nif-laser
FYI, Lawrence Livermore was part of UC Berkeley till recent times, FWIW.
We also have fully-autonomous (AI) battle robots, stationary, ground-mobile and (presumably) airborne. This has not only been in the hands of a private contractor but a foreign one, Samsung. And it has been spreading since the first stories in 2010 or so.
http://theweek.com/articles/454297/robots-are-nottoodistant-future-war
The funding seemed like the easiest way to bring attention to what I consider to be a problem that’s grown rapidly out of control — and something which was also rife in the 60’s/70’s/80’s before a bit of it got dialed down (not a lot, but maybe a little bit, by more investment by corps as opposed to mostly gov). I think it’s far far worse now than it was in the 70s, though. That problem is, of course, using universities as breeding grounds to create weapons and create the people to work on those weapons. This is *especially* true in the ‘dual-use technology’ fields such as molecular biology (schools with bsl 3 and 4 labs? really? Have you seen the safety records of these, btw?), analytics (some may argue with me on whether this is dual use, but without it there could be no mass surveillance — that’s good enough for me), ‘homeland security’ as a ‘major’, ‘offensive computer security’ programs sponsoring a growing number of tuitions, robotics programs getting the majority of their “interesting” grant money to create microrobotics capable of spying and macrorobotics capable of *fighting wars* (or at least toting weapons and such), bio-materials engineering programs getting funding from agencies who want exoskeletons, and so forth (yeah, that’s so far from exhaustive that if I went any further I’d find myself going on for hours, and honestly I don’t find these to be the best examples).
When you teach people things with an eye towards military or ‘civil defense’ use, instead of teaching concepts that underlie *all* uses, you create people who see the world through military and ‘civil defense’ lenses — and who often wind up stuck getting repeated funding from the same places.
This has no business in a university setting.
And it’s generally somewhat more hush-hush in a lot of ways when it *is* offloaded to a uni setting. Especially when third parties and contractors get in on the action. Along with the hush also comes a lot of ‘dissipation of blame’.
Journal of the Atomic Scientists (the same people who bring us the ‘Doomsday Clock’ (and that news isn’t good either this year)) has been calling more attention to this lately as well; Give their site a look-see. Start with http://thebulletin.org/stopping-killer-robots-and-other-future-threats8012 (I have a great deal of respect for scientists who try to bake the application of ethics into their science; old-fashioned, I know).
In general I believe that any weapon or ‘war’ removing skin from the game is not war — it’s something else entirely, and it ain’t good. Somedays one sits back and wonders if people didn’t just start watching dystopian movies and instead of saying ‘we need to avoid this future’ thought to themselves ‘why gosh, that’s brilliant’.
It’s over 70 years since Asimov invented his Three Laws of Robotics. Killer bots are here sooner than he believed they would be.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics
Obviously the MIC’s needs are more important than humanity’s…
I’d prefer the alien invasion scenario. Can I pick that one?
Over zero law killer robots loose on Earth? Wussy…
Killer robots are designed by humans. Aliens aren’t. I’d rather both sides have to deal with a lack of total ‘intelligence’ on the enemy (then again, there’s satcom and the internet… maybe aliens ARE the worser choice).
When you use the term ‘conspiracy theories’ to demean alternate explanations – some plausible, some not – it only serves to discredit your assertions and question your motives…
‘conspiracy theories’ is exactly what they are, including the one that it makes the moose walk backwards. (Damn those meese; they have enough trouble walking forwards!)
As you well know, the term is now used only to demean others’ alternative explanations of somewhat mysterious events, usually aimed at those who do not automatically swallow whole the governmental-created versions. It is a well-worn phrase mostly used by Neocons and their faithful supporters to try to discredit any and all valid questioning of their dogma. You seem to fall into that category…
The term is used to describe the idiotic ideas of people to lazy to learn anything. Most conspiracy theories violate well known laws of physics because their adherents are too lazy to come with ideas that are even remotely sensible. Show me some actual evidence that I am discrediting any valid questioning.
1. The Dreyfus Affair: In the late 1800s in France, Jewish artillery officer Alfred Dreyfus was wrongfully convicted of treason based on false government documents, and sentenced to life in prison. The French government did attempt to cover this up, but Dreyfus was eventually pardoned after the affair was made public (an act that is credited to writer Émile Zola).
2. The Mafia: This secret crime society was virtually unknown until the 1960s, when member Joe Valachi first revealed the society’s secrets to law enforcement officials. What was known was that organized crime existed, but not that the extent of their control included working with the CIA, politicians and the biggest businesses in the world.
3. MK-ULTRA: In the 1950s to the 1970s, the CIA ran a mind-control project aimed at finding a “truth serum” to use on communist spies. Test subjects were given LSD and other drugs, often without consent, and some were tortured. At least one man, civilian biochemist Frank Olson, who was working for the government, died as a result of the experiments. The project was finally exposed after investigations by the Rockefeller Commission.
4. Operation Mockingbird: Also in the 1950s to ’70s, the CIA paid a number of well-known domestic and foreign journalists (from big-name media outlets like Time, The Washington Post, The New York Times, CBS and others) to publish CIA propaganda. The CIA also reportedly funded at least one movie, the animated “Animal Farm,” by George Orwell. The Church Committee finally exposed the activities in 1975.
5. Manhattan Project: The Manhattan Project was the codename for a project conducted during World War II to develop the first atomic bomb. The project was led by the United States, and included participation from the United Kingdom and Canada. Formally designated as the Manhattan Engineer District (MED), it refers specifically to the period of the project from 1942–1946 under the control of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, under the administration of General Leslie R. Groves. The scientific research was directed by American physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer. The project’s roots lay in scientists’ fears since the 1930s that Nazi Germany was also investigating nuclear weapons of its own. Born out of a small research program in 1939, the Manhattan Project eventually employed more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion ($22 billion in current value). It resulted in the creation of multiple production and research sites that operated in secret. With the total involved, this makes it one of the largest conspiracies in history. Entire towns were built for short periods of time, employing people, all under secrecy and top national secrecy at that. The government never admitted to it, the media never reported on it, and people had no idea for over 25 years. Project research took place at over thirty sites across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The three primary research and production sites of the project were the plutonium-production facility at what is now the Hanford Site, the uranium-enrichment facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the weapons research and design laboratory now known as Los Alamos National Laboratory. The MED maintained control over U.S. weapons production until the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947.
6. Asbestos: Between 1930 and 1960, manufacturers did all they could to prevent the link between asbestos and respiratory diseases, including cancer, becoming known, so they could avoid prosecution. American workers had in fact sued the Johns Manville company as far back as 1932, but it was not until 1962 that epidemiologists finally established beyond any doubt what company bosses had known for a long time – asbestos causes cancer.
7. Watergate: Republican officials spied on the Democratic National Headquarters from the Watergate Hotel in 1972. While conspiracy theories suggested underhanded dealings were taking place, it wasn’t until 1974 that White House tape recordings linked President Nixon to the break-in and forced him to resign.
8. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: The United States Public Health Service carried out this clinical study on 400 poor, African-American men with syphilis from 1932 to 1972. During the study the men were given false and sometimes dangerous treatments, and adequate treatment was intentionally withheld so the agency could learn more about the disease. While the study was initially supposed to last just six months, it continued for 40 years. Close to 200 of the men died from syphilis or related complications by the end of the study.
9. Operation Northwoods: In the early 1960s, American military leaders drafted plans to create public support for a war against Cuba, to oust Fidel Castro from power. The plans included committing acts of terrorism in U.S. cities, killing innocent people and U.S. soldiers, blowing up a U.S. ship, assassinating Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees, and hijacking planes. The plans were all approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but were reportedly rejected by the civilian leadership, then kept secret for nearly 40 years.
Need more?
Do you have a point to make?
10. 1990 Testimony of Nayirah: A 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die. The testimony helped gain major public support for the 1991 Gulf War, but — despite protests that the dispute of this story was itself a conspiracy theory — it was later discovered that the testimony was false. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony. It turned out that she had taken acting lessons on request of the CIA and was actually the niece of a major politician in Kuwait. Nayirah was later disclosed to be Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA. The Congressional Human Rights Caucus, of which Congressman Tom Lantos was co-chairman, had been responsible for hosting Nurse Nayirah, and thereby popularizing her allegations. When the girl’s account was later challenged by independent human rights monitors, Lantos replied, “The notion that any of the witnesses brought to the caucus through the Kuwaiti Embassy would not be credible did not cross my mind… I have no basis for assuming that her story is not true, but the point goes beyond that. If one hypothesizes that the woman’s story is fictitious from A to Z, that in no way diminishes the avalanche of human rights violations.” Nevertheless, the senior Republican on the Human Rights Caucus, John Edward Porter, responded to the revelations “by saying that if he had known the girl was the ambassador’s daughter, he would not have allowed her to testify.”
11. Counter Intelligence Programs Against Activists in the 60s: COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception, however formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971. The FBI’s stated motivation at the time was “protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order.” According to FBI records, 85% of COINTELPRO resources were expended on infiltrating, disrupting, marginalizing, and/or subverting groups suspected of being subversive, such as communist and socialist organizations; the women’s rights movement; militant black nationalist groups, and the non-violent civil rights movement, including individuals such as Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, the American Indian Movement, and other civil rights groups; a broad range of organizations labeled “New Left”, including Students for a Democratic Society, the National Lawyers Guild, the Weathermen, almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, and even individual student demonstrators with no group affiliation; and nationalist groups such as those “seeking independence for Puerto Rico.” The other 15% of COINTELPRO resources were expended to marginalize and subvert “white hate groups,” including the Ku Klux Klan and National States’ Rights Party. The directives governing COINTELPRO were issued by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, who ordered FBI agents to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize” the activities of these movements and their leaders.
12. The Iran-Contra Affair: In 1985 and ’86, the White House authorized government officials to secretly trade weapons with the Israeli government in exchange for the release of U.S. hostages in Iran. The plot was uncovered by Congress in 1987.
13. The BCCI Scandal: The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) was a major international bank founded in 1972 by Agha Hasan Abedi, a Pakistani financier. The Bank was registered in Luxembourg. Within a decade BCCI touched its peak, it operated in 78 countries, had over 400 branches, and had assets in excess of US$ 20 billion making it the 7th largest private bank in the world by assets. In the late 1980’s BCCI became the target of a two year undercover operation conducted by the US Customs Service. This operation concluded with a fake wedding that was attended by BCCI officers and drug dealers from around the world who had established a personal friendship and working relationship with undercover Special Agent Robert Mazur. After a six month trial in Tampa, key bank officers were convicted and received lengthy prison sentences. Bank officers began cooperating with law enforcement authorities and that cooperation caused BCCI’s many crimes to be revealed. BCCI came under the scrutiny of regulatory bodies and intelligence agencies in the 1980s due to its perceived avoidance of falling under one regulatory banking authority, a fact that was later, after extensive investigations, proven to be false. BCCI became the focus of a massive regulatory battle in 1991 and was described as a “$20-billion-plus heist”. Investigators in the U.S. and the UK revealed that BCCI had been “set up deliberately to avoid centralized regulatory review, and operated extensively in bank secrecy jurisdictions. Its affairs were extraordinarily complex. Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection.”
14. CIA Drug Running in LA: Pulitzer Prize Award winning journalist Gary Webb exposed this alongside LAPD Narcotics Officer turned whislteblower and author Michael Ruppert, CIA Contract Pilot Terry Reed, and many others. In August 1996 the San Jose Mercury News published Webb’s “Dark Alliance”, a 20,000 word, three-part investigative series which alleged that Nicaraguan drug traffickers had sold and distributed crack cocaine in Los Angeles during the 1980s, and that drug profits were used to fund the CIA-supported Nicaraguan Contras. Webb never asserted that the CIA directly aided drug dealers to raise money for the Contras, but he did document that the CIA was aware of the cocaine transactions and the large shipments of cocaine into the U.S. by the Contra personnel. “Dark Alliance” received national attention. At the height of the interest, the web version of it on San Jose Mercury News website received 1.3 million hits a day. According to the Columbia Journalism Review, the series became “the most talked-about piece of journalism in 1996 and arguably the most famous—some would say infamous—set of articles of the decade.”
15. Gulf of Tonkin Never Happened: The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is the name given to two separate incidents involving the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. On August 2, 1964 two American destroyers engaged three North Vietnamese torpedo boats, resulting in the sinking of one of the torpedo boats. This was also the single most important reason for the escalation of the Vietnam War. After Kennedy was assassinated, the Gulf of Tonkin gave the country the sweeping support for aggressive military action against the North Vietnamese. The outcome of the incident was the passage by Congress of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by “communist aggression”. In 2005, an internal National Security Agency historical study was declassified; it concluded that USS Maddox had engaged the North Vietnamese on August 2, but that there may not have been any North Vietnamese vessels present during the engagement of August 4. The report stated “It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night…” In truth, Hanoi’s navy was engaged in nothing that night but the salvage of two of the boats damaged on August 2. In 1965, President Johnson commented privately: “For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there.” In 1981, Captain Herrick and journalist Robert Scheer re-examined Herrick’s ship’s log and determined that the first torpedo report from August 4, which Herrick had maintained had occurred—the “apparent ambush”—was in fact unfounded. In 1995, retired Vietnamese Defense Minister Vo Nguyen Giap, meeting with former Secretary of Defense McNamara, categorically denied that Vietnamese gunboats had attacked American destroyers on August 4, while admitting to the attack on August 2. In the Fall of 1999, retired senior CIA engineering executive S. Eugene Poteat wrote that he was asked in early August 1964 to determine if the radar operator’s report showed a real torpedo boat attack or an imagined one. In October, 2005 the New York Times reported that Robert J. Hanyok, a historian for the U.S. National Security Agency, had concluded that the NSA deliberately distorted the intelligence reports that it had passed on to policy-makers regarding the August 4, 1964 incident. He concluded that the motive was not political but was probably to cover up honest intelligence errors.
16. The Business Plot: In 1933, group of wealthy businessmen that allegedly included the heads of Chase Bank, GM, Goodyear, Standard Oil, the DuPont family and Senator Prescott Bush tried to recruit Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler to lead a military coup against President FDR and install a fascist dictatorship in the United States. And yes, we’re talking about the same Prescott Bush who fathered one US President and grandfathered another one. Smedley Butler was both a patriot and a vocal FDR supporter. Apparently none of these criminal masterminds noticed that their prospective point man had actively stumped for FDR in 1932. Smedley spilled the beans to a congressional committee in 1934. Everyone he accused of being a conspirator vehemently denied it, and none of them were brought up on criminal charges. Still, the House McCormack-Dickstein Committee did at least acknowledge the existence of the conspiracy, which ended up never getting past the initial planning stages. Though many of the people who had allegedly backed the Business Plot also maintained financial ties with Nazi Germany up through America’s entry into World War II. In 1934, the Business Plot was publicly revealed by retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler testifying to the McCormack-Dickstein Congressional Committee. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup. One of the alleged plotters, Gerald MacGuire, vehemently denied any such plot. In their final report, the Congressional committee supported Butler’s allegations of the existence of the plot, but no prosecutions or further investigations followed, and the matter was mostly forgotten.
On July 17, 1932, thousands of World War I veterans converged on Washington, D.C., set up tent camps, and demanded immediate payment of bonuses due them according to the Adjusted Service Certificate Law of 1924. This “Bonus Army” was led by Walter W. Waters, a former Army sergeant. The Army was encouraged by an appearance from retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler, who had considerable influence over the veterans, being one of the most popular military figures of the time. A few days after Butler’s arrival, President Herbert Hoover ordered the marchers removed, and their camps were destroyed by US Army cavalry troops under the command of General Douglas MacArthur. Butler, although a self-described Republican, responded by supporting Roosevelt in that year’s election. In a 1995 History Today article Clayton Cramer argued that the devastation of the Great Depression had caused many Americans to question the foundations of liberal democracy. “Many traditionalists, here and in Europe, toyed with the ideas of Fascism and National Socialism; many liberals dallied with Socialism and Communism.” Cramer argues that this explains why some American business leaders viewed fascism as a viable system to both preserve their interests and end the economic woes of the Depression.
Need more?
Lou, do you have a point to make? How does listing some historical facts justify ignorant rambling on about things yo do not understand?
“The term is used to describe the idiotic ideas of people to lazy to learn anything.”
ALL of these ‘conspiracy theories’ were initially described as ‘idiotic ideas’. That is the point. Got it?
You forgot the CIA/mafia hit on JFK. BECAUSE he had pretty well told the “military/industrial” COMPLEX [IKE’s] and the CIA/BANKERS to go to hell!
Well, to be fair you need to list all of the thousands of things that the term was applied to that did not turn out to be real. And let’s not forget all the millions of idiots who believe those thousands of nonsensical theories.
Lou Marin: you forgot the Lusitania manifest, cargo and Board of Trade cover-up, the USS Maine investigation (turned out it really was coal dust), and the USS Iowa 1989 turret explosion and cover-up.
Hello Lou and Mike S. –
Um, I don’t know if I would tend to agree with a lot of what Lou might say, but Mike, I do believe he has a point about the way “conspiracy theorist” is used. Too often it is used to dismiss any questioning of the ‘official line.’ Wouldn’t you be quick to condemn MSM for buying the gov’t line without being skeptical? I know that there have been many articles right here on TI calling out MSM journalists for doing just that.
One thing that fuels “conspiracy theories” is that there is so much secrecy. It doesn’t engender trust. They “say” they have tried to be transparent, but I am not quite so quick to believe them. I may not have a lot of answers, but I do have LOT of unanswered questions about many things going on today. Asking questions shouldn’t be stigmatized, and those who do shouldn’t be labeled as ‘lazy.’
And they lacked certain commonalities with unwarranted conspiracy theories. Some conspiracy theories are warranted; presumably the author means to refer to the many that are unwarranted. Rational Wiki:
Unwarranted conspiracy theories do not have plausible and/or specific answers to these questions, also taken from the Rational Wiki entry:
How large is the supposed conspiracy?
How many people are part of this conspiracy?
Are there enough of them to carry out the plan?
What infrastructure and resources does it need?
How much time and money did it take and where did this money come from?
If there are many thousands of conspirators, how are they organized?
Where are the secret conferences held?
How do they keep track of membership?
If they are organised through known channels or entities, how do they keep non-members who work there from uncovering the conspiracy?
Who gains what from the conspiracy and for what price?
Is this the easiest way of gaining it? If not, why was it chosen over the easiest way?
If it is an old conspiracy — who gains what from maintaining it?
How likely is it to remain covered up if it has gone on for a long time?
If there are thousands of conspirators, and the conspiracy has gone on for decades, why have none of them defected?
Why have none of them leaked the story?
If many conspirators are dead, why have none of them told the truth on their deathbeds, or in their wills?
There are many intelligence agencies associated with rival nations, with the ability to expose secrets. If, say, the United States government is running a global conspiracy, why have the French, Russian, or Chinese intelligence agencies never revealed it, to cause a major scandal in the United States (if all intelligence agencies are involved, see #2)? If they have, when and where did they do so?
Unwarranted conspiracy theories are often based on ideas that are wrong, that is, not possible in the physical world. Often the chief inventors of these ideas are quite up front about their beliefs that normal physics is wrong, and only they know the truth. (For example 911 conspiracy theories requiring new theories of how air planes stay in the air or absurd misconceptions about how explosives work.) The theories that Lou lists have none of that.
Sharon,
Thank you for a sensible article.