SHARDS OF BLUE, RED, AND GREEN stained glass, remnants of an intricate crescent window that is a 4,000-year-old Yemeni art form, glitter in the sunlight before crunching underfoot. Atop a mound of dust and mud stands the shell of an ancient tower-house, sliced in half like a cake by an airstrike.
In addition to the growing number of civilian casualties in the country’s seven-month-long war, U.S.-made bombs dropped by fighter jets from a Saudi Arabian-led coalition are pulverizing Yemen’s architectural history, often referred to as a living museum. These airstrikes are tearing villages apart, forcibly displacing thousands and erasing the country’s inimitable heritage, possibly in violation of international humanitarian law, according to the world heritage body, UNESCO.
Entire villages in the Yemeni highlands appear to defy gravity. Remote high-rises cling precariously to cliff edges. Inside, the character of the fortress-like homes changes with the sun as it moves through the sky. Light filters through the stained glass of patterned windowpanes, called qamarias, illuminating the white gypsum plaster. At night, candles or rare supplies of electricity send dapples of color into the twilight.
Yemen’s time-honored homes are part of the country’s rich social fabric, embodying the culture of the families who have lived in them for centuries. The Middle East’s poorest nation is famous for constructing the world’s first skyscrapers, often up to 100 feet high, with as many as 11 stories designed to keep extended families and their livestock safely under one roof.
The violent assault on the country’s history over the past seven months began in March after a political power struggle between incumbent president Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi and Houthi rebels backed by soldiers loyal to the former president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, descended into civil war.
But Yemen’s internal conflict has also landed the country’s 26 million people in the middle of the regional struggle between Sunni Saudi Arabia and Shiite Iran, already at loggerheads over the war in Syria. After the predominantly Shiite Houthi rebels seized control of the capital, Sanaa, last year, Saudi Arabia and a coalition of nations supported by the United States launched an unrelenting aerial bombing campaign. There have been near-daily air raids ever since.
The Saudis say they intervened in Yemen for two reasons: to restore the Hadi government forced into exile by Saleh’s loyalists in the military collaborating with the Houthis, who they claim are an Iranian proxy, and to counter what they view as a growing threat by Iran to seize power and influence in the region. The level of Tehran’s support, however, is disputed.
At least 5,604 people, including 2,577 civilians, have died since the conflict began in March, according to a United Nations tally of figures from local health facilities. That number is probably an undercount of the real figure, because many of the dead or injured never reach medical treatment centers and bodies are often buried unrecorded.
A joint report by the U.K.-based charity Action on Armed Violence and the United Nations’ Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs concluded that airstrikes were responsible for 60 percent of civilian casualties in the first seven months of this year.
One of the worst hit areas has been Yemen’s northern province of Saada, the birthplace and homeland of the Houthi movement. Saada City, the provincial capital, was founded before the fourth century B.C., as the hub of the Minaean Kingdom of Main.
On May 8 the Saudi-led coalition declared Saada City, home to some 50,000 people, a “military zone,” which Human Rights Watch says is a clear violation of international humanitarian law, and gave civilians a few hours’ notice to leave.
Many of those who did not heed the coalition’s warning were forced to flee their homes by the ensuing airstrikes. The village of Rahban, on the outskirts of the city, was razed. It consisted entirely of historic, centuries-old multistory homes with thick rammed-earth walls, rainbow-colored stained-glass windows and hand-carved wooden doors. Timber joists that supported families for tens of generations now protrude from piles of rubble. More than 30 homes were wiped out.
Ibrahim al-Sabra, 23, and his relatives were one of more than 100 families who fled their homes to escape an apparently deliberate tactic of forced displacement of civilians that could amount to a war crime under Article 53 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. The bombardment that destroyed his home started just after 3 a.m. and killed two of al-Sabra’s cousins.
“Now we have no home, it’s gone forever,” said al-Sabra, who is struggling to rent a house for his family in the city. “Rahban is where the poorest people in Saada City lived. The only thing of value that we had was our homes.” The newest houses there were more than 100 years old.
On May 9, a day after the coalition’s ultimatum for civilians to leave, multiple airstrikes hit the heart of Saada City’s historic old city. Abu Tah, 28, witnessed three bombings that hit the market in front of the ninth-century al-Hadi mosque, killing two patients along with a doctor, who practiced out of his house next door to the mosque. Four others, including a second doctor, were also killed, he said.The mosque is the final resting place of Imam al-Hadi ila’l-Haqq Yahya, the first Shiite Zaydi imam of Yemen, who died in 911 A.D. Local legend has it that the site of the mosque is where the Prophet Mohammed’s camel once rested. But today, the mosque’s prominent green dome is cracked like an eggshell and its doors blown out. Repeated ground-shaking strikes just a few feet from the high walls surrounding the structure have crumbled its ceilings. For the first time in its 1,200-year history, the Hadi mosque is now closed.
“We want peace; we call for peace. We don’t want our people divided,” said Abdullah al-Mutamaze, a cleric, historian, and caretaker of the abandoned mosque. He sat among the rubble in a broken chair at the edge of a 10-foot-deep crater in front of the main entrance and fretted that the community’s essential cultural and religious heritage would be lost.
The fact that Sunni Saudi Arabia, whose king has the title “Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques” of Mecca and Medina, is bombing a town once famous as a seat of Shiite Zaydi scholarship is not lost on al-Mutamaze. “This is just a title, they still target the people they hate,” he said.
The destruction of historical sites and Shiite mosques is not unique to Yemen. One of Saudi Arabia’s coalition partners, Bahrain, demolished or vandalized at least 35 Shiite mosques during the country’s political uprising against minority Sunni rule in 2011, according to the Bahrain Center for Human Rights, all with Saudi backing. The Saudi Kingdom has shown very little, if any, regard for its own historical sites. The former director of the Mecca Hajj Research center previously stated that by 2008, more than 300 ancient sites had been destroyed in Mecca and Medina alone.In the past, Yemenis have not defined themselves, or their places of worship, by sect. But the country’s social structure is now being ripped apart by new divisions created and stoked by the ongoing war.
American and British support for the bombing campaign continues despite calls from human rights organizations to halt weapons supplies to the Saudi-led coalition in the wake of what Amnesty International called “damning evidence of war crimes.” Democratic members of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, however, managed to delay the latest planned transfer from the U.S. to Saudi Arabia of precision-guided weapons.
In response to the Amnesty report, the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs released a written statement on October 7 denying all allegations of intentionally bombing civilians. “Any accusation of such intentions is a false claim spread by those who support the rebels attempting to wreak havoc in Yemen,” the statement read, adding that the airstrikes in Saada were aimed at the Houthi rebels.
In September, the spokesperson for the Saudi-led coalition, Brig. Gen. Ahmed Assiri, told The Intercept that the coalition was using Western precision-guided weapons “to avoid collateral damage.” But that’s still happening. These days, the market’s narrow streets, normally bustling with traders and rippling with the echo of the call for the afternoon prayer, lie ghostly quiet. The bombed-out spice market, clothes shops, and ancient caravanserai that welcomed travelers and traders over the centuries lie in ruins. Both the past and present are reduced to the same dust and rubble.The devastation serves as a disturbing portent of what may yet befall the UNESCO World Heritage site of the old city in Sanaa, which has been continuously inhabited for more than 2,500 years. Folklore has it that the walled city, on a highland plateau more than 7,200 feet above sea level, was founded by Shem, son of Noah.
At risk are the picture-postcard houses of old Sanaa. The labyrinths of cobbled streets twist and turn around scores of hidden gardens, steam bath houses, busy markets, and densely packed terraced homes that stretch up toward the sky. The Grand Mosque, believed to have been built during the life of the Prophet Mohammed, stands as a haven of serenity at the heart of this vibrant city.
“We have to see the houses as part of an integrated urban fabric, which is also a social-cultural fabric,” said Michele Lamprakos, architectural historian at the University of Maryland and author of Building a World Heritage City: Sanaa, Yemen. “They provide a window onto Sanaa’s long urban history.”
The old city has already been bombed twice. On June 12, five members of the same family were killed when four homes crumbled to the ground after being hit with a 2,000-pound bomb. A further strike on September 19 destroyed a traditional four-story home, killing 10 members of the al-Ayani family — eight were children. More than 130 densely packed, terraced homes of old Sanaa were damaged by the blast.
As of October 15, according to the U.N., up to 82,300 people have been internally displaced in Saada, and 2.3 million in all of Yemen. It is not clear how many are permanently homeless due to forced displacement, in contravention of international laws of war, by apparent deliberate bombing of houses.
“We left our homes before, but we went back,” said Fatima, who did not want to give her full name. She now lives in a school in Sanaa with her four children. “But this time, our home and half our village was destroyed, for what?” she asked. “They are not just buildings, they’re part of us, the heart of our families for hundreds of years.” She tried to count on her fingers the number of generations that had lived in her demolished house.
Saudi-led airstrikes have displaced Saada residents, pictured here in the district of Khamir, Yemen, May 9, 2015.
Photo: Mohamed al Sayaghi/Reuters /Landov
“The Saudis and their American bombs are erasing us from history.”
The annihilation of Yemen’s cultural heritage extends far beyond air raids on the famous ancient skyscrapers of the northwestern highlands; other areas of the country’s pre-Islamic history have also fallen victim to the coalition’s bombing.
The world-famous Great Marib Dam was bombed for the first time in May. Dating back to the eighth century B.C., the dam was 50 feet high and 2,100 feet wide, almost twice the width of the Hoover Dam. It was a wonder of the ancient world, watering the region for 1,000 years. Marib was the capital of the Sabaean Kingdom, ruled by the Biblical Queen of Sheba. Last month the province became the latest front-line battleground for coalition troops and the Houthi forces.
In the remote desert of Al-Jawf, more than 100 miles northeast of Sanaa, Baraqish, the country’s most impressive pre-Islamic metropolis, reached its zenith in the fifth century B.C. and remained inhabited up until the 19th century. On August 18, the imposing 40-foot-high, unbroken stone curtain that had protected the city for some 2,500 years was bombed by the coalition, destroying a section of the ancient wall.
Anthropologist and historian Francesco G. Fedele, who worked in Yemen for almost a decade — including three years in Baraqish — as a member of the Italian Archaeological Mission to Yemen, says the city’s temple to the god of healing, Nakrah, was destroyed by the Saudi-led bombing. Pictures of the site after further strikes on September 13 confirmed his worst fears.
A second ancient temple to the god of thunderstorms and rain, Athar dhu-Qabd, was also mostly lost to the aerial assaults. The joint Italian-Yemeni team excavated and painstakingly restored both temples as part of a 25-year project that ran from 1990. The shrines were cultural treasures for the whole Arabian Peninsula.
The Houthi-run state news agency, Saba, reported further airstrikes hit the northern wall of Baraqish and the temples on October 14, although the claim could not be immediately verified.
A small museum housing the most precious finds from the team’s excavations was similarly reduced to piles of shattered stone in September, says Fedele. On September 17, Irina Bokova, director general of UNESCO, deplored “the senseless destruction of one of the richest cultures in the Arab region.”
One of the great religious centers of ancient Arabia, Sirwah, just 75 miles east of Sanaa, was damaged earlier in the conflict, and is under renewed threat from waves of intensive airstrikes carried out since Saudi-coalition troops pushed into the district in early October. While deliberate demolition by ISIS of ancient artifacts and historic sites in Iraq and Syria has been widely reported and denounced, the reaction to the Saudi-led coalition laying waste to Yemen’s cultural history, in what some archaeologists say is a pattern of systematic targeting of the country’s heritage, is comparatively subdued.
“We are dealing here with unnecessary and possibly wanton destruction … by the Saudi Arabian army,” said Fedele. “It is sad that such a conduct by the Saudis is not being condemned and, worse still, is kept under silence by conniving governments particularly in North America.”
Meanwhile in the besieged city of Taiz, the Houthi-Saleh forces seized the prominent Al-Qahira Citadel, perched on a mountain spur hundreds of feet above the city, before it was repeatedly bombed. Now, those fighters are blocking water, food, and medicine — already in short supply due to a coalition-imposed naval blockade of the county — from entering parts of the city not under their control. Staring up at what little remains of the 1,000-year-old castle from outside a hospital, unable to treat patients due to a lack of medical supplies, one manager admitted concern for the country’s heritage could seem irrational.
“We can’t think about the past, or the future,” the manager said. “We’re too busy trying to survive the present.”
Although Intercept provides much needed coverage of areas from a point of view sorely lacking in the U.S., other times articles read like propaganda pieces.
What seems like propaganda?
STOProcedure for the basic rewriting of history is to destroy all evidence. A policy that has been carried out for thousands of years and even has been used on the Moon and Mars.
As the Lamb of God song “Contractor” goes:
Privatize to conceal all the lies
big business is booming like its the 4th of July
No need for all the formalities
Jump the kangaroo courts
and plant the lynching trees
“Palmyra: destruction of ancient temple is a war crime, says Unesco chief”…
You’re absolutely right, Fabrizio, but where is the UNESCO Chief’s condemnation of the destruction of Saada’s ancient heritage sites?
Here’s the quote from this same UNESCO official, yet to be said: “Saada: destruction of ancient temples and Mosque is a war crime”. So, UNESCO Chief, where’s your condemnation of the destruction of Yemen’s ancient cultural sites?
Thank you for your article.
Yemen is one of the most culturally rich and beautiful countries on earth. It really is a special place. While it has always suffered from extreme poverty and political instability, I have always been pleasantly surprised by how positive, kind and hospitable are the Yemeni people. They also have a deep respect and attachment to the land they live on as well as their history.
Despite the violence that ensued during and after the Arab Spring, it did however appear that Yemen might be able to regain its diginity and political destiny; this, however, has unfortunately been crushed by nefarious political leaders such as Saleh, Houthi, AQAP and others.
But no-one is more complicit in the complete destruction of Yemeni society on all levels than the Saudis themselves. By getting involved in this internal struggle, they have pitted one side against the other, allowing political instability and war to continue unabated. At the same time, the Saudis commit cultural genocide against Yemen. Even if the Yemenis have no food, water, shelter or future, they at least have their pride and history, and even that is being wantonly destroyed everyday by a medieval dynasty fantastically devoid of art, culture, enjoyment or history – the complete opposite of Yemenis.
What a depressing irony.
It is not an internal struggle, never has been, it has always been East v West, Russian v American, Shiite v Sunni, The Enemies in Arabia vSaudi Arabia.
This is not pat-a-cakes turned into fisticuffs by nefarious outside meddlers. This is Bigs Boys trampling on the flowers again. Common folk have rarely been to blame in the world’s ills – and so it goes.
Yemen is the historic region of the Arabian peninsula, the rest is pretty empty and has only been occupied outside of the Saudi Arabian religious centres of Mecca and Medina and Jeddah because of oil drilling.
Yemen is actually a beautiful and unique country, with ancient tower houses and stunning towns perched high on mountains for defense. Won’t save them this time.
The temples near Marib, along with the dam, are some of the only remaining pre-Islamic heritage sites on the huge peninsula. The Saudis have always been very anti anything archaeological and pre-Islamic, such as these Sabaean sites and the Nabataean sites of the north.
That the spectacular sites of Palmyra – Tadmor – and Hatra were systematically destroyed by ISIS is no coincidence, actioned no doubt at the orders of their Saudi paymasters. And all done with US weapons. Hatra is ENORMOUS, the temple complex in the centre of the city beggars belief in its magnitude, whilst the Temple of Bel at Palmyra is one of the largest temples built at any time in history.
Welcome to the shit reality of our rulers’ construction, paid for with our taxes. Hateful is not strong enough. Miasma – polluted filth against all good – is better.
Disgusting. Fuck them all. They are rotten to the core and robbing us of everything – our heritage, history, liberty and hard-earned cash.
The Saudi Regime and the regime of Washington DC (Repubs/Dems) are monsters and should be brought to justice.
Pretty much a new rule for the masters of the universe:
IF WE CANNOT PATENT IT, WE WILL BOMB IT!
Well said. I am discovering what apoplexy feels like.
I’m sorry but I don’t see anything here would lead me to believe the US is bombing Yemen with the objective of destroying historic buildings. What would that do for us?
As for Saudi Arabia, I think you have to look at its Islamic ideology to understand why they do things like this. Basically, Islam regards anything people create and then revere as an idol. That includes buildings, pieces of music, sculptures, etc. All such human cultural production is seen as people worshipping man-made creations instead of the creator, and so to curb our idolatrous impulses and purify society we have to get rid of all that. Lest you accuse me of focusing on extremists, remember that this kind of thing has a long history in Islam, going back way before colonialism. Often to bolster their credentials as pious Muslims, Islamic rulers would destroy ancient Egyptian and Mesopotamian monuments, which of course they abhorred as remnants of jahilliyya, the time of pagan ignorance before Muhammad’s revelation. Western Orientalists are entirely responsible for reconstructing the histories of those ancient civilizations. So it’s very dishonest of you to put forth Saudi Arabia’s violence as something they just do because they’re bad guys part of the evul American empire and not discuss the real ideology behind it.
I’m sure neither the US nor Saudi Arabia set out to destroy historic buildings. They probably just don’t care either way. It’s not a consideration — much like “collateral damage”.
Then why is the article titled “U.S. and Saudi Bombs *target* Yemen’s Ancient Heritage”?
It says “US and Saudi bombs…”, not “US and Saudi bomb”. Get the difference?
Uh, yeah that’s what I wrote. Emphasis on the word target, which implies intention.
That’s alright then. I guess the Saudis have never meant to trash their own archaeological heritage as they’ve done over the dcades and get ISIS to do the same to Syria’s more recently. Just a mistake. Mea Culpa!
Do a search on “Saudi Arabia” and “attitudes towards archaeology” and enlighten yourself.
Also Palmyra had explosives planted, the seed, Noahide.
“…the Emperor Antiochus’ ancient order to enforce idolatry, that it is the very job description of a king: Make the people bow down to idols — first of all, the Idol of the king himself. Torah saw that power tends to addict, and absolute power addicts its holder absolutely….”- Rabbi Arthur Waskow | 12/9/2012
Well, the problem seems to be older than islamic ideology and similarities are striking.
You are either brainwashed by the culture of idolatry or unable to understand the text. As Iona explains ” the old city of Saana has been continuously inhabited for more than 2,500 years.” before it was destroyed by the self-idolizing kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
You may believe what you wish, but it is evident that neither the Saudis nor the US consider anything other than the presence or possible presence of opposition members in targeting. Otherwise, for instance, the MSF hospital in Kunduz would not have been repeatedly attacked by the US Air Force for hours, even as the hospital personnel pleaded directly with both the US and Afghan governments.
US air bombardment has always been accompanied by an extensive propaganda campaign; during WW2 for instance there were many news clips about bombardiers dropping pickles into barrels from 10000 feet. Anyone who has been to Europe – even now – can attest to the magnitude of that distortion, and indeed, many of the incidents, such as the bombing of a school in Milan in 1944, are still recalled today. The difference between WW2 and now is that our weapons are now capable of remarkable precision. When they function as designed – which is most of the time – they land within at most a few meters of their targets. That however is insufficient to prevent many needless deaths and much needless destruction, because the people launching those weapons do not care who they kill or what they destroy.
That brings up yet another difference between WW2 and the present day: In the War, people on both sides correctly regarded the enemy as an existential threat, and were almost universally drafted into service. At present, the threat we are countering is one of our own making, one that does not in fact threaten our way of life to nearly the same degree as our own governments do in their efforts to counter it, and those who engage in the fighting are volunteers, paid mercenaries if you will, whose motivations include pleasure and monetary reward. Not a one of those assholes who bomb Yemen or kill doctors, reporters and innocent civilians is doing it because he has to.
Knowing this about the history of extremist Islamic ideology, and we know that the Saudis have supported it, then arming them as we do is our fault at helping to destroy historical monuments. Whenever someone says that shooting the cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo represents an assault on civilization which must be avenged, one can look at how our arming of a fanatic regime also assaults what we regard as civilization. To force people to live in hovels of our making or that of our allies, is in fact to turn their young men into ahistorical soreheads looking for a leader. We are as much the problem as anyone else in the mix.
here we go. We call barbarians ISIS for destroying Palmyra but when US and Saudi Arabia (your beloved ally and champion of democracy..) do that, well, they didn’t do that on purpose, it was collateral damage. It’s actually dishonest of you to support these continuous double standards and not focus on the main point: either they bomb indiscriminately and inaccurately and that makes them amateurs or…
they do that on purpose.
In both cases,
The bombing of Kunduz’s Hospital belongs to the same story (brilliantly covered by the Intercept, actually).
now, let’s come to this part:
“As for Saudi Arabia, I think you have to look at its Islamic ideology to understand why they do things like this. Basically, Islam regards anything people create and then revere as an idol. That includes buildings, pieces of music, sculptures, etc. All such human cultural production is seen as people worshipping man-made creations instead of the creator, and so to curb our idolatrous impulses and purify society we have to get rid of all that”
Should we excuse that? are you serious?
Should we also excuse the ISIS for destroying Palmyra?
Man, please, don’t ridicule yourself.
Get a Job at Fox news.
They may need someone like you to serve coffee.
“They may need someone like you to serve coffee.”
ROFL!
Priceless. :)
“All such human cultural production is seen as people worshipping man-made creations instead of the creator, and so to curb our idolatrous impulses and purify society we have to get rid of all that. Lest you accuse me of focusing on extremists, remember that this kind of thing has a long history in Islam, going back way before colonialism. Often to bolster their credentials as pious Muslims, Islamic rulers would destroy ancient Egyptian and Mesopotamian monuments, which of course they abhorred as remnants of jahilliyya, the time of pagan ignorance before Muhammad’s revelation.”
Yet such ancient artifacts remained standing despite thousands of years of Muslim rule. Rather the problem is Wahabbism of Saudi Arabia that has been fully supported by the US since the Cold War as a proxy against Communism and now against Iran. And the US is fully complicit as they supply Saudi Arabia with the bombs and equipment. So it’s not dishonest at all. You are correct in wanting to discuss the “real” ideology behind such acts but what you should ask is knowing that Wahabbism is an inspiration to extremist groups, why does the US still furnish Saudi Arabia with billions of dollars of advance weaponry and continues to support Saudi Arabia as an ally?
WHY do our governments treat the Houthis worse than ISIS? Why do all the media report ISIS terrorism against Houthis as “attacks”, holding back all the invective and condemnation that they would usually apply to a car bombing?
If the Houthis insist on trying to invade South Yemen, and if the people there truly don’t want them, I’m not going to necessarily say the Saudi Arabians couldn’t take targeted action like the U.S. takes against ISIS. But any “free fire zone” should have been in Raqqa. You could just about justify something like that there, in the sense that failure to reduce that city to rubble could cause more civilian casualties than doing so. But I see no such case for the Houthis.
But above all else: WHY do we mindlessly accept a campaign that targets the rivals of Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, yet show no particular objection to the fact that this terrorist organization, the very one our endless war supposedly is meant to target, holds territory in the southern parts of Yemen? Surely we should have put them as our highest priority at every step of this process?
I have no idea – it’ll be left to experiment. The experiment is to see if the Houthis get frustrated and send people out to start blowing up car bombs and hijacking planes into buildings, and if doing that gets them the respect and moderation the others seem to enjoy.
It’s simple: Because the assessment of the planners must be that the Houthis are a non-trivial threat to regional hegemony. Syria, on the other hand, is not under the control of the US/NATO, either way, so ISIS in Syria doesn’t matter very much. It does to some extent in Iraq.
Because ISIS are a Saudi/US invention set up to destabilise Shia islamic states such as Syria and Iran, and guess what, the Houthis are Shiites too! So they get bombed!
The Shiite and Sunni split began immediately after the death of Mohammad, unlike the Protestant-Catholic split which happened 1,500 years after Christ, give or take a few precursory persecutions, such as of John Wycliffe’s followers, the Lollards. The Orthodox-Catholic Schism was a lot earlier, sort of rattling on for hundreds of years after around 450AD. But Christianity has always been prone to schisms and sectarianism, much more than Islam.
Geography and history gave the Sunnis the majority of the population – around 80%, but gave the Shiites control of much of the oil. Hence the West helped create and then constantly supported the Saudi royal regime, always with a view of destabilising the Shiite power.
It is now coming to a head and I expect it to escalate into nuclear war within the next year. I do not think Iran, Syria or Russia will sit idly by.
My biggest unknown – and worry – is China, because they will want low oil prices, which the Russians and Shiites are trying to maintain, but they rely on trade with the US more than Russia. They could go either way, and also make a territorial grab throughout Asia, which could see Japan and Korea attack them. Japan has recently changed its law and now allows itself to enter into armed conflict, when before it had a defence-only approach.
No one is safe.
I thought it was the Saudi Arabians who turned on the oil taps, with the intent of driving American/Canadian frackers out of business.
If you want to see what old Yemen looked like, the 1974 Pier Paolo Pasolini film “Arabian Nights” shot much of its footage on location there. The story aside, the footage shows just how much ancient architecture probably is rubble now. It’s probably the only look you’ll get at what it was, now.
The sad part of catering to our government – Oh, WOW a great friend one day then no longer of use
If one were a complete fool, one might be prone to wonder, where are stories of the destruction of priceless Yemeni historical sites and artifacts in the MSM, given their extensive coverage of such activities by the Taliban and ISIS. But since we are by definition the good guys, anything we do is justified, whereas, since our opponents are by definition the bad guys, anything they do is barbaric.
So we strike a wedding party and it is either unacknowledged or stated to be an accident, but if a handful of thugs machine guns people in a Paris theater or restaurant, it is an act of terrorism. I am so tired of hearing all the lame excuses on both sides for the murder of innocents! If we are indeed civilized, why don’t we just stop. STOP.
I agree…
The insanity has to stop….
Thank you for the story.
It is heartbreaking to see thousands killed by bombing and Yemen’s heritage being destroyed……
http://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2015/jun/12/old-town-of-sanaa-after-airstrikes-and-before-in-pictures
To see how beautiful the place is and to see its destruction must be extremely painful to Yemenis and others who value history and heritage.
Beyond comprehension, how they could do it and continue to do it…
ps Thank you for the video link….. the music is absolutely gorgeous though it does not mention the details..
Most people “feel” for the hundreds of victims of terrorism in Paris.
Most people do not “feel” the same way about thousands of innocent victims in Yemen.
That is the regrettable truth!
Can we get our fellow westerners to “feel” more if our mainstream media informs us better? Perhaps.
Will they show us the true nature of the devastation caused by this indiscriminate killing spearheaded by the Al Saud and approved by the West? No!
Despite the best – and unfortunately miniscule – efforts of The Intercept, journalism is dead. The admission by General Flynn that the US are arming ISIS should have been a global press-stopping and Watergate-esque game-changing revelation, but it didn’t even make the news! WTF???
I have been reading the comments on the Yahoo articles for the French attacks and the attitude is hateful and murderous – I would not want to be a Muslim in Europe right now. The Jews were victimised in many countries in WW2, but this is EVERYWHERE.
I feel very angry towards certain family and friends back in England, who are meekly complicit and supporting and excusing of the actions of our wicked governments. I have said since Thatcher came in and began the undermining of our rights and freedoms that it would end terribly, but they all wanted their houses to of high value and to feel they supported the political party that stood for economic growth. I think Thatcher has been the role model for all these people – she strode into power and demolished the great traditions of labour rights, trade unionism and community in Britain, setting up industries that enriched her cronies and ruined her foes.
Now these idiiots will get war, insane oil prices, hyper-depression and stagnation of economies, and complete shifts of wealth away from Europe. I cannot see how Europe will benefit AT ALL, and believe our leaders must be planning to brutally subjugate the populations once reality bites hard.
Europe is full of cash-rich retirees doing nothing but spending money on healthcare and holidays. Once the Americans get their oil price up again, all industry will desert Europe and the Banking & Service sector will become meaningless. It will be a disaster and all those idiots back home are beating te drum for war and backing the Americans all the way to Hell.
And so it goes. I think I would rather be time-transport-teleported into Slaughterhouse 5.
Unchecked capitalism is perverse!
Naomi Klein wrote about unchecked capitalism in relation to the environment, but the abstraction of the ideas she presented applies.
Stephen Hawkings, as recently as last month, openly aired out concerns about unchecked capitalism. Marc Andreesen suggested that Hawkings should purchase an Econ 101 book.
When common folk are concerned about their next meal, or paying the next bill so they will not be evicted, they are much less likely to be concerned about someone in Yemen being bombed. In fact, they probably do not want to see it – or, so we are told by the MSM.
The wave of empathy for the French is because muslims have already been demonized – this is empathy against the muslims and not for the unfortunate.