ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, climate activist Joel Domenjoud’s day started with a phone call saying that police had broken down the doors of a friend’s squat, arresting at least two people. Fearing that his home would be next, Domenjoud slipped out of the little apartment that he shares with his girlfriend in the Paris suburb of Malakoff.
In the wake of the ISIS attacks on November 13, the French government has declared a three-month state of emergency that allows for house arrests, unwarranted searches, and limitations on the movement of people. The government also banned public demonstrations, including the massive actions that had been planned for the international climate conference, known as COP21. Numerous reports have emerged of police raids on individuals with no plausible connection to terrorism, including climate activists.
Domenjoud had been busy that week fighting in court against the ban on demonstrations and preparing alternative actions related to the climate talks, which began today. He had been awaiting the results of what is known as a référé liberté arguing that the ban violated the fundamental rights of those affected and asking an administrative judge to overturn it. The judge declined to do so.
Domenjoud had also filed papers declaring plans for a climate convoy to pass through two Parisian suburbs into the city. The convoy included occupants of a ZAD, or zone à défendre, territory in the west of France that has been occupied by activists for years to prevent developers from building an airport.
Now Domenjoud wondered if he’d be able to participate in climate conference activities at all. He stopped at a library near his home that he runs as part of an activist collective. Peering out the window, he saw what looked like cops at the back of his apartment building and decided he’d be more secure in a public place. Domenjoud ordered a coffee in a café and began calling journalists, NGO workers, and union members he knew.
“I told them, I think I will be arrested by the end of the day.”
The main square of the town, visible from the café window, seemed to be full of undercover cops. He rushed into the street and ducked into a passing bus, switching off his phone. “I had few hours to live my life,” he told me.
Safe in Le Centre International de Culture Populaire, which is something of a Parisian nerve center for social movements, Domenjoud switched his phone on. His Lebanese neighbor called. Police had swarmed the building, she said, then handed her phone to an officer, who told Domenjoud to report to the precinct within the hour.
Back in Malakoff, Domenjoud was served with a document saying he would be placed under house arrest for the full two weeks of the conference because of his alleged leadership role in planning COP21 protests. Citing the gravity of the terrorist threat and the presence of world leaders, the reasons for the arrest included his participation in COP21 preparatory meetings, his organization of workshops at a summer anti-nuclear camp in Bure, and the possibility that he might facilitate the actions of “black bloc” protesters, who are more likely to take aggressive action or disobey police.
Domenjoud is one of 24 French activists who were put under house arrest last week for planning protest actions related to the climate conference. He doesn’t know the names of most of the 23 others, but he became their de facto media spokesperson after a human rights organization included his name in a press release. “I can’t stay in the shadows if everybody knows my name,” he said. He’s not sure he would be talking otherwise. “If you become public, it is as if you were judged.”
For months before the November 13 attacks, Domenjoud worked long hours helping coordinate plans for demonstrations and meet-ups involving French and international activists who would be in Paris for the climate conference. Climate activists, including marquee names like Bill McKibben and Naomi Klein, were calling for disruptive actions that would exert pressure on officials to go beyond the very limited agreement to be signed at the end of two weeks.
Paris was supposed to be a launching point for activists to build a more coordinated international movement in the coming months and years against the systems that produce climate change.
On November 13, Domenjoud was sitting at a bar after a COP21 organizing meeting, when a text told him that 3 or 4 kilometers away people had been murdered in a terrorist attack. He recalls texting to another friend, “We cannot imagine what all the consequences of this will be.”
“In our heads we began deconstructing all of our plans,” Domenjoud said. “Everybody had a big fear there would be an attack on the march. Everyone was thinking about it — we were thinking about it. But there is a point where it’s your choice, not security’s choice.”
The event he helped plan for November 29 was to include hundreds of thousands of people. “This was very a big challenge for security,” he said, even before the attacks. “The state of emergency brought an answer to what they could not resolve.”
Organizers had envisioned a radical space at the march’s starting point, where those uninterested in marching in what some viewed as a parade put on by NGOs could exchange ideas and build an anti-capitalist movement. And this perhaps is one reason the authorities felt so threatened by Domenjoud. “I know there will be a radical part,” he said. “I will not be responsible for what happens. It’s a social movement.”
Domenjoud talks to everybody, he says, and wishes others would do the same. “Everyone is a little bit selfish,” he said. “Everyone could have a place if they would communicate more. Maybe there would be more black blocs taking off their hats, and there would be more radical action by the NGOs.”
Protests did go forward on Sunday, but on a much smaller scale than originally planned. Place de la République was filled with 11,000 shoes donated from around the world. By noon they had been carefully cleared, and a human chain formed on the sidewalk of the former protest route; the chain wound down Boulevard Voltaire about 2 miles to Place de la Nation, breaking only briefly as it passed the heaps of decaying roses in front of the Bataclan. In the middle of the hourlong event, the mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, and Chilean president Michelle Bachelet appeared with a convoy of black security vehicles to visit the memorial.
Promptly at 1 p.m., the human chain disconnected and the activists dispersed. A smaller, more radical element appeared on Boulevard Voltaire an hour or so later, chanting and marching back toward Place de la République. Some protesters continued to march around the perimeter; other people mingled and chatted in the square as riot police moved to block all entrances to the plaza. A cloud of tear gas formed in one corner. Soon at least two other canisters were fired toward the square’s center.
Samuel Zouari, a member of a student union called Solidaires étudiant-e-s, watched as riot police began to move toward the center of the square. He said he’d come prepared to be arrested. “There were all these things about continuing to live our lives, and go out at night, and do what people think is French stuff,” he said. “To protest is a way to continue to live our lives.”
In the end, 174 people were arrested.
Domenjoud’s main role in the COP21 protest planning, he told me, was to organize a legal team, in part to provide support for those who would inevitably be arrested at protests like the one on Sunday. But his biggest obsession was with creating spaces around the conference for dialogue. “My main objective was not to have a big protest. The most important thing was to have food and accommodations,” he said. “So we could meet people in the evening, exchange addresses.”
Although he must sign in at the police precinct three times a day, Domenjoud can move around his suburban district during the day. He’s begun holding coffee hours every afternoon at 2:30 p.m. at his collective’s library, where even under police pressure, activists can come and quietly build a movement.
Top photo: Police officers search a man during a police and gendarmerie raid in a building believed to be a squat in Le Pre Saint-Gervais, northeast of Paris, on November 27, 2015.
My instinct tells me that TPP & TTIP is front running climate change negotiations. World leaders will never make major concessions until TPP & TTIP is passed. Once TPP & TTIP is passed these very same world leaders will be praised and made to look brilliant for finally making the necessary climate change concessions, they will then leverage these concessions to get re-elected while knowing in their heart of hearts that TPP & TTIP will eventually destroy any possibility of ever implementing them without being stifled and bogged down in major multi national corporate law suits with the sovereign governments party to the legislation. Investigate this and make the connection between COP21, TPP & TTIP. Predict and show how all the concessions will happen after TTP & TTIP are passed.
Please help us democracy is dying in france they’re planning on banning tor and public wireless access point.
Mr. Holland feels the heat; his back is against the wall, with attacks coming from Mme. La Pen and others on the right, who will use any excuse to tighten the reins. But perhaps it did not have to be this way, perhaps he could have appealed to reason and logic instead of promoting a climate of fear.
Here is a for instance. How many terrorist attacks like the last one would France have to suffer to have a murder rate equivalent to that in the United States? (The underlying postulate being that the US is “safe”). It is an easy calculation. The US murder rate is 5.0 per 10,000 people per year, while that in France is 1.31. That means that France would have to see another 3.69 murders per 10,000 per year to achieve the same level of safety that the US enjoys. Since there are 66 million people in France, that equates to 24, 354 additional killings per year, or 468 per week. Let’s see: the terrorist raid left 130 people dead, so three per week would NOT be sufficient to make France as safe as the United States. That, I think, puts the attacks into proper perspective.
But I agree, it is not a good way to get votes, and all the politicians care about is getting votes.
Holy crap — THAT is a great comment! The wonders of mathematics! Except… the rate is 3.8 per 100,000 as of 2013. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate ) It really is almost that high in the District of Columbia, though – but there we’re talking poor urban blacks making up the statistics, and nobody pretends they’re safe except when it’s time to jail them for carrying guns to protect themselves.
I think cutting the rate to 2508 a year or 209 a month doesn’t actually harm the argument … just makes it believable.
Good Comment
“the French government has declared a three-month state of emergency that allows for house arrests, unwarranted searches, and limitations on the movement of people. The government also banned public demonstrations”
The three months will soon become a permanent situation. Governments constantly push boundaries on what their citizens are willing to put up with.
And there you have your police state. The recent developments over here in Europe (UK and France specifically) are disgusting.
Time to vote them out of office, organize and unite the vote to get rid of people like these that want to be tyrannys
Call me crazy, but multinationals probably had more to do with shutting down protests during COP than any security concerns.
Ms. Brown and TI staff –
Thanks for reporting on this. We NEED to keep up with such developments. Giving your article a focus on Mr. Domenjoud was an interesting angle.
So keep us informed, ‘k?
Democracy Now! http://www.democracynow.org/ is broadcasting from Paris this week, and is giving extensive coverage to stories like this one.
This shows the importance and power of public demonstrations. People getting together to express their dissatisfaction is powerful enough but the greatest power comes from the masses getting together, exchanging views and ideas and then uniting in just common causes. Article also reveals how hard it is to “hide” from the authorities and to what costs and extremes they will use to track down anyone. It was easier to hide from the NAZIs than today’s criminal power holders and dictators.
How f’n convenient to have the Paris “terror” attacks when they did so that little scooterette twerp Hollande could seize power in a coup AND shut down any climate dissenters.
When you want to create the dystopian progressive future nightmare, a UN global government, it’s best to have people scared and distracted and all screaming at each other while you remove the remaining pieces of the facade that is democracy.
That means the bankers only have to control the few at the UN in order to control the many, instead of having to deal with so many pesky countries.
Throw in TTP and TTIP and the like and our enslavement is complete
It’s a bit too easy to write off the notion of legitimate international institutions as “UN global government” lest we are identified with the John Birchers of the world. After all, the original intent or vision of the League of Nations and later the United Nations was to prevent war through collective security, and that was to happen via a truly democratic institution with authority, an aspiration ultimately frustrated by narrow-mindedness. The reality on the ground is that power is still centered in national institutions and monied interests. It is those same interests who are negotiating TTP and TTIP. Despite this, it’s important to maintain hope in the capacity of man to come together selflessly to solve problems, however dark our immediate horizon may appear.
It’s a bit too easy to write off the notion of legitimate international institutions as “UN global government” lest we are identified with the John Birchers of the world. After all, the original intent or vision of the League of Nations and later the United Nations was to prevent war through collective security, and that was to happen via a truly democratic institution with authority, an aspiration ultimately frustrated by narrow-mindedness. The reality on the ground is that power is still centered in national institutions and with monied interests. It is those same interests who are negotiating TTP and TTIP. Despite this, it’s important to maintain hope in the capacity of man to come together selflessly to solve problems, such as the activities of Joel Domenjoud and so many others indicate, however dark the immediate horizon may appear.
Demonstrations are a major contributor to global warming, so I’m not surprised that France has outlawed them. Putting environmentalists under house arrest gives everyone a chance to cool off – which, after all, is the main goal. I hope this article doesn’t make anyone hot under the collar, since the situation might flare out of control and eventually reach the boiling point. Hopefully, cooler heads will prevail and everyone will chill out.
Despite its historical role, France seems to have a weak and shaky democracy. Of course, the fall of the Third Republic had help from the Germans, but the appeal of the Vichy regime ran too deep, I think. The Fourth Republic led to the wars in Algeria and Indochina; then they jumped to a long term for a powerful president in the Fifth and suddenly cut loose all of West Africa to swim or (more often) sink. Then they kept tinkering with the specifics. In 1974 they finally came up with a sort of constitutional rights that could be asserted by 120 different legislators (only) but apparently it’s not enough! See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Fifth_Republic
Now I’m not French, I don’t know, but given the cold facts of history it seems hard to be confident that the country is going to come out of this again. Maybe martial law, enforced secularism, or rule by decree simply become the new normal? If so, let’s hope there is a Sixth Republic someday.
What the French government has done and continues to do in Francophone Africa is finally hitting home. How will meeting, organising and protesting online not also soon be outlawed??? What we are seeing around the world is a reduction of freedoms, particularly the freedom to speak out and voice dissent against those in power, purportedly that we, the people, empowered; all justified by the bizarre Orwellian logic of safety against “terrorism”, which is a construction mainly of The U.S. and its enslaved states of NATO. This, of course, has nothing to do with “democracy” and all to do with totalitarianism. My greatest fear is that soon people will accept THIS [logic ] as the new normal.
@p –
You have summarized the dangers here quite well. I am also concerned that folks will accept such abuses. After all, we have to keep safe and “if you’ve nothing to hide, you’ve nothing to fear”, right? Right — until you’re ensnared and then it’s too late.
Mr. Domenjoud does not appear to be confined under commonly understood conditions of “house arrest”, as stated in the title of this report. There are an extraordinary number of informative and collegial gatherings of climate activists from all over the world meeting here in Paris with minimum interruptions from French authorities.
“Work is love made visible.” KG
As Usual,
EA
Hi Ethan Allen –
You’re in Paris? Can you talk more about what’s going on there? I AM glad there are good gatherings going on. But still think the climate toward dissent is getting downright chilling. Not sure if this is the same link I posted elsewhere but it does have the quote I remember:
“Some protesters argue that the permission granted to football matches, trade fairs and Christmas markets in Paris over the summit period suggests that the authorities’ real concern is to suppress dissent.
“We are trying to find grey areas in the law,” said John Jordan, a prominent activist. “At the moment, a demonstration is legally defined as more than two people who share a political message. We are trying to find creative ways around these laws.”
Mr. Domenjoud, the main subject of TI’s article is also mentioned here:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/nov/27/paris-climate-activists-put-under-house-arrest-using-emergency-laws
No doubt what you say is true; they will allow the powerless to meet in private all they want, as long as they do nothing to garner publicity for the intransigence of the Friends of Oil, among whom are numbered the French government. It is only those who threaten to point out that this is a facade who earn the attention of the French officials.
France was among the most vocal in pushing for an overthrow of Qaddafi, rushed into Iraq in hopes of sharing in the postwar oil boom, and was instrumental in setting up the conditions that led to the current situation in Syria. Certainly, France is no friend of environmentalism – as any survivor of the Rainbow Warrior could attest, and the country continues both to bear the burdens of its colonial past and (along with the UK) a desire to return to the glory days of empire.
I say this not as a Francophone, but as a realist. In fact, I love France. Just not their military heritage.