Last week, we reported that Howard Dean, former presidential candidate and current supporter of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, had attacked Bernie Sanders for supporting a single-payer health plan, claiming that having the government pay for everyone’s health care would “undo people’s health care” and result in “chaos.” In our story, we noted that Dean, once a proponent of single-payer, now works for the lobbying practice of Dentons, a law firm retained to lobby on behalf of a number of pharmaceutical and for-profit health care interests.
In response, Dean tweeted: “I continue to support Single pay or [sic] and I do not Lobby.”
He tweeted the next day: “The Intercept=The Daily Caller of the left. Same propaganda techniques.”
Dean did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Dentons’ director of communications, Bennett Kleinberg, wrote to us to say, “Howard Dean is a senior advisor with Dentons in our Public Policy and Regulation practice. However, he is not a registered lobbyist and does not lobby public officials on behalf of clients of the Firm.”
Since joining the lobbying industry, Dean has oddly argued on multiple occasions that he does “not lobby.” But he engages in virtually every lobbying activity imaginable, helping corporate interests reach out to lawmakers on legislation, advising them on political strategy, and using his credibility as a former liberal lion to build public support on behalf of his lobby firm clients.
In his new career, he has helped drug companies maintain monopoly power, reversed his old positions on Medicare prices, and worked to undermine a critical component of the Affordable Care Act. Though known for his anti-war rhetoric in 2004, Dean has accepted money from Mojahedin-e Khalq, an extremist group seeking regime change in Iran and has criticized President Obama’s negotiations with Iran.
The fact that Dean is not a registered lobbyist reflects a distinction that is largely meaningless in today’s Washington. Thousands of other professionals in the lobbying business have either never registered or de-registered and lobby registration law has almost never been enforced. Newt Gingrich, who was widely criticized in 2011 for acting as a lobbyist for various clients without registering, was hired last year by Dentons’ lobbying practice, where he works closely with Dean to consult with clients on political strategy. As Legal Times reported, the Dean-Gingrich team is now a selling point for Dentons as the “pair aims to become another Washington-based bipartisan tag team who can act as political soothsayers for whichever corporate clients call upon them.”
In 2009, Dean joined the lobbying division of the law firm McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, which represents a number of health care interests. Through the firm, he was retained that year to work for Biotechnology Industry Organization, or BIO, a lobbying group for biotech and pharmaceutical companies.
After being retained by BIO, Dean authored an opinion column for The Hill newspaper arguing in support of a bill backed by his client that called for extending the exclusivity period for drugs made from living organisms, such as vaccines or Herceptin/trastuzumab, a treatment for breast cancer.
Dean claimed in the piece that a “commonsense and fair approach, similar to the process and timeline currently in place for generic versions of chemical-based medicines, would allow the original developer of the biologic to protect the proprietary data used to develop the medicine for at least 12 years.”
Dean’s call for extending the exclusivity period for biologics — a move that would boost prices for life-saving drugs — shocked patient and consumer advocates. Dean did not initially disclose that he was working for BIO in his column, although The Hill later updated his byline to note that Dean’s law firm represented biotech companies.
The inside story of Dean’s work for the biotech lobby was revealed in an article by BioCentury, a trade publication. According to the report, Dean and his former campaign manager Joe Trippi were hired by BIO to help move forward the biologic legislation backed by the industry. Jim Greenwood, the president of BIO, told BioCentury that Dean was brought on to help with messaging, strategy, and even to contact lawmakers on Capitol Hill on behalf of the industry. BIO made clear that Dean was hired specifically for his reputation as a liberal. “As a physician clearly focused on health care, a Democrat leader and clearly to left of center, his efforts were impactful,” Greenwood said.
Dean defended his efforts to BioCentury by saying, “I do not lobby.”
In the end, a version of the biologic legislation was folded into the Affordable Care Act.
“Howard Dean navigated around the lobbying rules to push Democrats to back big drug companies on the term of the monopoly for biologic drugs,” said Jamie Love, the director of Knowledge Ecology International, a nonprofit organization that addresses human rights aspects of intellectual property rights and medical innovation. “His ‘trust me, I’m a doctor’ routine was worth billions to Roche and the other companies he represented on this. Now it is very hard to undo the damage.”
On the 2004 campaign trail, Dean criticized the role of health care lobbyists in setting prescription drug policies, such as the deal engineered by drug companies that prevents Medicare from using its bargaining power as the Veterans Administration does to negotiate for lower drug prices. Such a change would save over $116 billion over 10 years. Dean told the Associated Press: “As president, a high and early legislative priority of my new administration would be to improve the prescription drug benefit to create one that is affordable, federally administered, and for all of America’s seniors; uses the government’s buying power on behalf of 41 million seniors to negotiate and drive down drug prices; contains meaningful cost containment including reimportation of safe, effective medicines.”
But Dean, whose new employer, Dentons, represents the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the powerful drug lobby group known as PhRMA, has now changed his tune. During a discussion with Gingrich last year, Dean reversed his position and said he is now against allowing Medicare to bargain for lower drug prices. Dean told the audience that some expensive drugs, like those used to treat hepatitis C, could eventually save money long term, a claim Inside Health Policy noted closely echoed drugmakers’ arguments.
In September of last year, Dean took his newfound love of drug companies to the pages of the New York Times. In a letter to the editor opposing an op-ed that proposed to allow Medicare to bargain for cheaper prices, Dean wrote that “schemes to launch a federal attack on one of the last growing, innovative industries in America are in the long run counterproductive for both job creation and, more important, for the health of human beings around the world.”
In 2013, Dean again surprised health care advocates by publishing a Wall Street Journal opinion column criticizing a key component of the Affordable Care Act: the Independent Payment Advisory Board, also known as IPAB. The board is designed to allow a group of experts to make recommendations on how Medicare can save money, but only in ways that do not reduce benefits and low-income subsidies or raise premiums. Dean, repeating GOP arguments against the board, called IPAB “essentially a health-care rationing body,” and he said it should be repealed.
Health policy experts reacted furiously. The New Republic writer Jonathan Cohn noted that it was quite puzzling that Dean, supposedly a supporter of government programs designed to use evidence-based approaches to set provider payment rates, would suddenly decide to oppose IPAB. “Or maybe it’s not so strange to hear Dean say this,” Cohn wrote. “Since his career in politics ended, Dean has found a home in the K Street establishment he once held in such disdain.”
“Shame on Howard Dean,” wrote economist J. Bradford DeLong, who noted that it appears as though Dean was “being mendacious to try to protect the profits of the clients of McKenna Long & Aldridge.”
Dean conceded to Time that his firm has clients that oppose IPAB, but refused to disclose them.
And in December 2009, as the Affordable Care Act nearly died as conservative opposition grew to a fever pitch and Democratic leaders struggled to find enough votes to move it forward, Dean appeared on national network news programs to call for President Obama to scrap the legislation and start over, a process that would have doomed any chance for health care reform.
The Mojahedin-e Khalq, an exiled Iranian group that has attempted for years to overthrow the government of Iran, paid Dean to help in its campaign to be delisted as a U.S.-recognized terrorist group. In 2011, the Wall Street Journal reported that Dean was receiving speaking fees from the group. Around that time, Dean began vociferously arguing on behalf of the MEK, even though he conceded that he had known little about the group before joining its cause.
That year, Dean traveled along with other paid MEK supporters, including Rudy Giuliani, to appear in Berlin with the group and demand that Western nations recognize the MEK leader Maryam Rajavi as the president of Iran. In addition to carrying out a campaign of terrorism against Iran, the MEK helped Saddam Hussein after the Gulf War crush rebellions in Iraq’s Shiite and Kurdish communities. “Take the Kurds under your tanks, and save your bullets for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards,” Rajavi once said.
In 2014, Dean came out against President Obama’s policy of engagement with Iran, declaring that the U.S. negotiations failed to account for the interests of the MEK. (Dean even spoke on Capitol Hill on behalf of an MEK-affiliated group, which posted the video online.) Last year, Dean continued to advocate against a nuclear accord with Iran, calling Secretary of State John Kerry and Obama “far, far too eager for a deal with Iran.”
Dean’s success on the other side of the revolving door rests in part on his credibility as a left-wing icon. And yet, despite his fiery rhetoric on the campaign trail in 2003, Dean by most accounts governed Vermont as a business-friendly, moderate Democrat. Even his record on single-payer is far less supportive than what he has attempted to project.
In 1991, as the lieutenant governor of Vermont, Dean testified in support of single-payer. But as governor, he quickly backtracked, claiming that single-payer would be too expensive for the state.
John McClaughry, Dean’s Republican opponent for governor during the 1991 election, recalls that Dean continually shifted the goal posts for single-payer. “I don’t know that Howard has any fixed principles about this issue — it’s what sells at the moment,” McClaughry said.
Dean’s evolution as a politician is discussed at length during the first Huffington Post podcast Candidate Confessional. During the interview, Dean explains that he knew well before the infamous post-Iowa caucus scream that he had little chance of becoming president as an insurrectionist populist. He yearned to be regarded as a serious, establishment-friendly politician, but was too slow in making the transition as a candidate.
“I couldn’t make the turn to become an establishment candidate,” he lamented.
Didn’t Trump say, paraphrasing here: “All politicians are for sale” .. and they were like phfff yea we are!
The irony (odd dichotomy) Trump is now a politician.
There’s a circular logic passage in the Bible (hint that a God didn’t write it) goes something like this: All Cretans are liars; I know, because a Cretan told me.
Just replace Cretan w/ Politician.
PS did I spell Cretan correctly (who cares)
I typically lean conservative, but I actually went to several Iowa campaign events for Dean, hosted his “rangers” overnight in my home, and shared in some foolish naiveté as my friends presented him with custom made action figures of himself.
People really believed in him.
He owes it to his former supporters to be honest with us in how he is manipulating our democracy in ways that benefit only the privileged few.
It is sad to see someone you admired become part of the problem. Sad indeed.
Talking to congressmen on Bio and writing articles and giving legal support to an industries proposals to increase profits is not lobbying in the same sense that Pres. Clinton inserting his member in a woman is not sex if it is an alternate orifice.
dean has sold his soul to the highest bidder and you have proven this – AGAIN!!
Keep up the good work, Lee. I’m enjoying reading all your articles and lurking around your Twitter feed.
Kudos
Just how bad is Howard Dean’s financial portfolio for this to become of him?
Good thorough argument. Excellent investigative reporting. As a Vermonter I liked much of Dean’s presidential campaign rhetoric, but thought that Hitchens legitimately caught him in a few lies. As he began his post- primary ascent into Democratic power politics I found him more and more repulsive. I rarely indulge in insults, but my honest gut reading of Dean is that he is truly a slimy worm-tongued liar for hire. Dean’s Confession that,”“I couldn’t make the turn to become an establishment candidate,” is really telling about what it means to be an ‘establishment candidate’. It means to work for the interests of the rich and the ruthless against the common good. That famous yawp was not misread, it was not a cry of freedom or triumph, it was the cry of an ego breaking through into the upper reaches of power, the war cry of unmitigated personal ambition.
How he “grew” in office. Another establishment, status quo exploiter of the American people, a complete and utter shill.
Great reporting!
Seems Howard took another professional oath-the politician’s hypocritical oath. His leadership skills align perfectly with Hillarys and that of a wind vane whereby money replaces the wind.
Pretty much the most awkward interview you will ever see with Howard Dean, especially the part where Abby confronts him about his support for the MEK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OspazctzJ-4
[full disclosure, i am abby martin’s brother]
Hey! Where is that wonderful abby, that pretty, sexy, smart woman who was the best journalist in RT, and the best they ever had…I miss her a lot.
Awesome summation of the case against Howard Dean. No wonder he’s mad.
BERNIE SANDERS: ISSUES
Medicare for All: Leaving No One Behind
https://berniesanders.com/issues/medicare-for-all/
It’s not dispositive, but how many single payer advocates do you know, that refer disparagingly to “the left”?
So, to recap, Dean was for single payer, until he had the power to enact it in his state, now he says he’s still for it, and if you doubt that just ask the presidential candidate he’s supporting, Clinton, who’s against single payer.
As for making healthcare available to everyone, at lower cost, being “chaos”…just read that back to yourself and try not to laugh.
And interestingly when Vermont did make an attempt at single payer, interestingly it was Clinton’s boss Obama that helped stop it.
The reason there is no “chaos” in the rest of the world, where people can, give birth, get cancer treatment, get their broken arm mended, is because they don’t have to worry about an Obama saying “we’d have to start from scratch”, or a Rahm Emanuel saying “you’re a bunch of retards”, or a Clinton:
I was just looking for a comparison chart, I found one, it’s hilarious:
Germany – infant mortality rate 3.48, physicians per 1000: 3.5 GDP health care cost 10.4
USA – infant mortality rate 5.9, physicians per 1000: 2.4 GDP health care cost 16
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_compared
And Germany isn’t even at the top of the chart. Guess who’s at the bottom?
Actually you should copy Germany’s system. It’s closer to America’s “system” (if you can call it that) than is the UK or Canadian system. So if you are aiming to be middle of the pack, try the German model.
Don’t tell Dean about the “laughably small” co-pays in Germany, he’ll say it’s chaos.
I lived as an expat in Germany from 1999-2009 and was operated on more than a dozen times in a hospital known as the Deutsche Klinik fuer Diagnostik, which touts itself as “the German Mayo Clinic”. During the same time, I had one emergency hospital stay while in the US. The cost for the 12 operations in DKD was less than that for one in the American Hospital. These were not simple operations and several of them were life-saving operations. Quite simply, the German System was superior in care, performance and cost.
Mr Dean, had he done 1% of the research on Lee Fang’s career as Lee Fang has done on Dean’s career, would have not been so ignorant as to give Lee Fang a reason to go after him…
Dynamite reporting, Lee! ! You’re getting close to overtaking GG as my favorite reporter. Begin using a few challenging words that I have to look up in your stories, and you’ll vault into first position.
Trust me; I’m a Doctor, Priest, Lawyer, Cop, CEO; POTUS, whatever! The old maxim “Nullius in verba magesteri” (take nothing on the word of the master) has never held more true. Frankly, I have more respect for the Mafia than I have for corporations in general and big pharma in particular. I would trust a nut case Taliban leader before I would trust President Obama. The history (real history, not the propaganda they teach in school) of the world going back to the Pharaoh and his Priests shows that they are all self serving scum bags and most are sociopaths and the working class is dumber than rocks to allow themselves to be so easily exploited by the elites backed by the priest class. The French national Anthem where it calls for the death of the aristocrats needs to be followed until we can rid the world of the sociopathic exploitative parasitic classes.
Yes, a good article. But it’s largely preaching to the converted. Elsewhere, Dean’s lobbying double-speak is taken on trust, and helps to frame legislation. I could weep! What will it take to get the MSM to do its job and “speak truth to power”?
Clearly, lobbying for manufacturers – indeed, even lobbying for consumers – is never going to solve the problem with health care. The stupid part is that the current system is too greedy for its own good, failing to pull in the profit it ought to, while denying medicine to the masses or making them pay a king’s ransom for it. My image of the medical profession is as a hulking, stupid bully that is not going to let you get into the schoolhouse until you have been relieved of every dime of your lunch money … but the process of turning you upside down and shaking is so inefficient most of it gets lost down the storm drain.
The concepts that information is property, or the right to market things is property, are simply wrong. We know it’s wrong – we had the Boston Tea Party in ‘celebration’ of just how wrong it is. So the question is: can we plan our economy so as to have a large, competent, good paying health care sector, including lots of research, and yet allow every single thing the research uncovers to be available to the public at-cost, which is to say, for a thousandth of what they are paying for it now? Of course we can. Copyright, trademarks, patents, market exclusivity — this is not a law of nature, it’s a shitty tax. A tax on the sick, when health enters into it. So we repeal that tax and pass another one, one which is paid by the people with the money, whether sick or healthy. We could actually allow each individual taxpayer to select independent organizations to control the funds taken from him, so that there would be a market feedback mechanism, an individualistic control over what medicine gets invented and what movies are made rather than allowing the state to impose a totalitarian culture. Which is better than intellectual property, when we look at how studios are forced to pander and compromise, or the total concentration of pharmaceutical firms on things that people have to take for the rest of their life instead of cures.
If everyone pays as much as they do now for drugs, but had access to the entire gamut of everything available, they win. And if companies, instead of paying for expensive marketing campaigns, simply have to show professional medical organizations their drugs are good treatments, they win too. Who loses? Well, I guess the TV channels that rely on a constant stream of companies running ads that rehearse the specific symptoms that a patient can mention to get their drug prescribed rather than another. But then again, if we make the same reform for copyrights, then they shouldn’t have to pay anything to air their content, so they’re ahead too. The publishers of those shows, of course, would then have to get funds from the literary funding organizations that taxpayers select … but the money spent by taxpayers there is money that would have been taken from the high prices they spend on drugs and any other product illegitimate enough to be advertised on TV.
We can simply stop fighting one another in a pointless economic cage match to decide which bullies get access to the drugs and who we watch die for sport. There is no scarcity. We all could win.
Nice beat down Lee.
Yep, devastating.
Good hit piece, and well deserved.
Howard Dean, with one scream,
Ended his White House chances.
Now he struts about, saying I’m no lout,
Though corporate views he advances.
Lee Fang … 99% :-) Thank you!
Another great piece. Thanks, Lee!
Bravo, Lee. Excellent journalism.