A GEORGIA LAW aimed at keeping unlicensed drivers off the streets is having a disproportionate impact on black and Latino communities in the state, sweeping them into a cycle of debt and criminalization that feeds local counties’ budgets while putting otherwise law-abiding undocumented immigrants at risk of deportation.
Under the law, drivers face felony charges if they are caught driving without a license four times within five years. Violators face up to five years in prison and fines between $2,500 and $5,000. Ostensibly passed to promote public safety, the “felony driving law” has been discriminatively applied to communities of color, leading to remarkably disproportionate arrests of blacks and Latinos in at least three majority white counties in the state, according to a report published today by the Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights (GLAHR) and Advancement Project, a D.C.-based civil rights organization.
Undocumented immigrants cannot legally obtain driver’s licenses in Georgia, and critics say the bill, signed in 2008, was one of many passed by states to restrict immigration. But by lumping unlicensed driving and driving with a suspended license under the same category, the law has also swept up a significant number of African-Americans in a state that already had one of the country’s highest incarceration rates.
“Even though the law was written to specifically target unlicensed immigrants, because of the way that they created this large category for a felony conviction, they also are pulling in a lot of African-Americans,” said Flavia Jiménez, a lawyer at Advancement Project and a lead researcher on the report. “That’s the danger of mixing these overly harsh criminal laws with immigration enforcement.”
After being alerted to the growing number of arrests for unlicensed driving by an immigration hotline, researchers obtained public arrest records for Fayette County, Houston County, and Roswell City. They found that Latinos and blacks in these counties make up a minority of the population but the overwhelming majority of those arrested under this law. The researchers said that traffic stops, often over broken taillights, failure to signal, or other minor infractions, revealed a clear pattern of racial profiling and a readiness to penalize people who have not committed any crimes other than unlicensed driving.
In the Latino community, in particular, where many families comprise U.S. citizens as well as documented and undocumented immigrants, encounters with law enforcement have become a source of terror.
In one incident described in the report, an undocumented man driving with his three daughters was threatened by an armed man who quickly fled the scene. When one of the girls called police, officers asked her father for his driver’s license. When he couldn’t provide it, police arrested the man in front of his children.
That kind of experience is something Latino and black residents, undocumented or not, share all too often. When the law was first proposed, in January 2008, black legislators voted against it, fearing racial bias in its application.
“I have a certain sensitivity to racial profiling, or as they say in the community, ‘driving while black,’” Sen. Emanuel Jones told local reporters at the time. “I’ve been pulled over for no reason other than I’m driving in a new car and I happen to be black.”
“How can I explain to my constituents that I just made it easier for this to be a felony?”
“Our worst nightmare has come true,” he told The Intercept when he learned of the report’s findings.
For instance, in Roswell City, a suburb of Atlanta, Latinos make up 13.1 percent of the population but 63 percent of those arrested under the law. Whites make up 75.4 percent of the population but 8.4 percent of the arrests.
In Fayette County, blacks make up 21.4 percent of the population and 65.8 percent of the “felony driving” arrests, while Latinos account for 6.9 percent of the population and 17 percent of the arrests. Many Latinos in the community live in a large trailer park with only two access points, Jiménez said, and officers frequently set up checkpoints at both ends.
“It’s pretty clear that the way that this law is being enforced is targeting individuals whom these police officers absolutely know are undocumented. They know they don’t have driver’s licenses, they know they have families to feed,” Jiménez said, pointing to the lack of public transportation alternatives. “Families really feel under attack, they feel very much harassed.”
Houston County only records the ethnicity of those arrested as black or white, leaving investigators to estimate the number of Latinos affected by looking at their last names. “They don’t even see the racial profiling as an issue,” Jiménez said. There, it’s mostly African-Americans, who make up 28.15 percent of the population and 64.96 percent of the “felony driving” arrests, who bear the brunt of the law.
“What happened is that a law that was intended to have a discriminatory impact on one group, had a discriminatory impact on another group,” Francys Johnson, an attorney and the president of the NAACP’s Georgia chapter, told The Intercept. “That should not surprise anyone. This is part of a scheme of laws designed to target immigrants in Georgia, designed to foster a climate that sends a strong message to immigrants that you’re not welcome. And African-Americans know well that message, we operated under Jim Crow laws for years.”
“What this also does is continue to drive a wedge between these communities and law enforcement,” he added. “When you have a policy that’s not designed to serve and protect but rather to target a group, it should not be any surprise to people that this law should also drive the community and the police further and further apart.”
Officials for Houston County and Roswell City did not respond to requests for comment. Randy Ognio, vice chairman of Fayette County’s board of commissioners, said he was not aware of the report’s findings but didn’t think the law was being applied “disproportionately.”
“If they are driving without a license, and they get caught so many times, whether it’s Hispanic, white, black or whoever, they’re gonna get a felony on their record,” he told The Intercept.
For undocumented immigrants with no access to legal licenses, any traffic stop is a cause for concern, but a felony conviction risks setting deportation procedures in motion.
In November 2014, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency circulated a memo describing as immigration enforcement “priorities” individuals posing a threat to national security, public safety, and border security.
“This includes aliens convicted of an offense classified as a felony in the convicting jurisdiction, other than a state or local offense for which an essential element was the alien’s immigration status,” Bryan D. Cox, a spokesperson for the agency, told The Intercept in a statement. Driving without a license does not count as an immigration-related offense, even though immigration status is the reason why undocumented drivers can’t obtain licenses in the first place.
The ICE memo also called for “prosecutorial discretion” and consideration for individual circumstances while responding to violations, but advocates like Jiménez maintain that those with a mere driving violation, even when classified as a felony, are not criminals and should never fall under those priorities.
In one case documented by the report, a woman said that her husband was deported after being arrested for driving without a license, leaving behind three children who are U.S. citizens. He had no other criminal history. When local immigration advocates became aware of similar cases, they lobbied enforcement officials, pointing to the harshness of the Georgia law, and successfully obtained the release of the individuals involved, Jiménez said. “But it’s unclear how many people have fallen through the cracks.”
Ignacio Portillo, an undocumented father of four who owns a small construction business, just hit his third strike yesterday, when he was pulled over for “failure to dim headlights” and arrested for driving without a license. The previous two times, he had been fined and sentenced to spend several weekends in jail, where along with several other Latino men, he was put to work on construction projects.
Portillo, who is from Mexico and has lived in the U.S. for 16 years, said he moved to Georgia from Texas to start his business and send his children — including two U.S. citizens — to better schools. But since moving there, he has experienced more discrimination. He was released yesterday after his wife paid $1,408.75. He said being unable to drive would put him out of work.
“I am very stressed, very scared; sometimes the rules are not fair,” he told The Intercept. “You feel very powerless. You work for your kids, for your wife, your house. And when the police stop you, they charge you so much money, as if you were a doctor or a lawyer. … We don’t have that kind of money.”
The fines, though a significant burden, are nothing compared to the risk of deportation.
“There’s always the fear; we don’t want to leave our family alone,” he said. “We have dedicated a big part of our life to the U.S., working. We should have a right to have a license and residency. Our life is our work.”
“There are people who rape kids, who steal, who sell drugs. [Police] have a badge and a gun, why don’t they use them to get these people?” he added. “Why do they go after someone who’s just working every day?”
Undocumented immigrants from Mexico, Rocio Martinez, left, and Aura Consuelo Morales walk with their children along Jimmy Carter Blvd. in Norcross, Ga., Sept. 30, 2011.
Photo: Erik S. Lesser/AP
Statutes such as Georgia’s felony driving law are partially a response to federal inaction on immigration reform. In Georgia, efforts to target immigrants have been “unprecedented,” according to a 2014 report by the Georgia ACLU. Between 2007 and 2013, immigration arrests in the state increased by 953 percent, a change that reflected a dramatic increase in enforcement and growing collaboration between local agencies and ICE.
“This is where we need federal leadership, immigration should be a federal prerogative,” said Johnson. “We don’t need to use state law to drive some policy agenda relating to immigration.”
But deportation is not the only risk unlicensed drivers face. Many are regularly sentenced to jail time, probation, and hefty fines — in a pattern of local governments funding their operations on the backs of low-income citizens that’s come under nationwide scrutiny in recent months.
Of the three Georgia counties surveyed by the report, only Houston County disclosed the revenue collected through enforcement of the felony driving law: $6 million over a four-year period. Residents interviewed for the report, most of whom have family incomes under $34,000 a year, said they felt like ATM machines. “There’s a woman who said to me,” Jiménez said, “We are like a goldmine here, I don’t know how else the county would make its profit if we weren’t here.”
That kind of complaint — raised in counties across the country since the Ferguson protests exposed widespread practices of local government profiting off low-income communities through traffic tickets and other fines — has prompted a recent DOJ memo essentially reminding court officials that raising revenue by forcing poor defendants to pay hefty fines and fees is unconstitutional.
“When we look at people driving with suspended licenses, it is largely economic factors, not any ability to operate a motor vehicle safely, that generally produce a climate where they can’t maintain a driver’s license,” Johnson said, citing unpaid tickets as the most common example.
“It’s the cycle into debtors prisons that we know exists in a lot of African-American communities; they are seen as offenders and a source of revenue,” Jiménez said. “There are a number of issues in the criminal justice system that are injustices, really.”
Ferguson put a spotlight on it, but the problem persists, and many are failing to see the ways in which it connects with immigration enforcement, she added. “I wish it was changing the conversation a bit more in places like Georgia.”
One thing you can be sure of is that these people driving without a license don’t have any insurance either. If you get in an accident with one of them and your car is damaged or you are injured, you ‘re out of luck.
I have a hard time believing that requiring these people to obey the law is is some form of Racism. If you believe that police are targeting your group, all you have to do to defeat them is to have proper documentation. It’s simple. This article is total BS.
Don’t get it. If i get pulled over and am found to be driving without a license, i am arrested and face prosecution. If it becomes habitual, then the state i live in should be able to call my action habitual, pass laws, and make the results very unpleasant.
The very act of being in the country “illegally” makes you in violation of the law. This is a nation of laws. Everyone is supposed to have equal treatment under the law. If you break the law, and the law states you are to be deported, then whats the problem?
I do not understand why if a group of people are more prone to break certain laws, why the law should be any different for them? Don’t break the law to begin with, and you wont be subject to punishment.
Nothing to see here.
To avoid fines and jail time, don’t break the law. That’s for everyone. It’s against federal law for illegal aliens to even be in the country.
Once the governor signs the legislation that bans “anti-discrimation ” protections the state will lose enough revenue that they won’t be able to keep their cheap prison labor. Bye bye a Georgia. Keep up your righteous Christian values.
How about get a license like everyone else? Then you won’t get arrested for this crime. Amazingly simple!
This is also probably a voter suppression law. Felons can’t vote. To target minorities is to disproportionately target Democrats.
Great law! I have to have a drivers license, and insurance and pay taxes every time I renew my license plates to maintain the roads and freeways. If a person has no license, they should be fined and go to jail even deported if here illegally.
True!
They’re easy targets especially when even if they aren’t doing anything wrong the new computerized police car tell the police information on every car around him. It sucks it’s discrimination at its best. But if you think about it does it really surprise anyone considering that state’s history.
“even if they aren’t doing anything wrong.” Since to get this felony, you have to “do something wrong” get caught and convicted on four separate occasions of driving without a license. So, willfully committing four crimes is not “doing anything wrong?” Thanks, I think we all understand where you are coming from now.
Why are Americans so much against enforcing the law? If i were to go to Thailand for a vacation i have to have a valid US passport and visa, funds to support myself while i’am there, no criminal record and a paid return air fare ticket. Plus every 90 days i have to check in with immigration to update myself.
Why is it these illegal aliens have no requirements. Federal law says illegal aliens must be deported whenever found by the Executive Branch, which Obama heads but does not do his job.
Actually the Obama administration has been criticized for having the highest deportation rates than previous presidents.
In the first two full budget years under the Obama administration, the U.S. deported more people year over year, until reaching its 2012 peak. Those increases, which started under the administration of President George W. Bush, were small, rising just a few percentage points each year. Nevertheless, the record deportations in 2012 led immigration advocates to criticize Obama as the “deporter-in-chief.”
Lawbreakers are lawbreakers, what do not younot understand about illegal immigrants. Blacks don’t get licenses and that is our problem? Do you want uninsured drivers on the road? Hope one of these assholes does not run into you or a loved one.
IT IS RACIST TO REQUIRE A DRIVERS LICENSE TO DRIVE A CAR!!!!!
Unauthorized immigrants are not allowed to get driver’s licenses, thanks to the 1996 Clinton-Gingrich immigration and welfare laws.
This makes punishing them, not for refusing to get the document they are required to have, but because the state refuses to give it to them, brutally unfair. And before people go off saying “they’re criminals,” take this into account:
a) Being an unauthorized immigrant in the United States is not a crime.
b) Undocumented immigrants in Georgia were *invited* to come, with the INS, the precursor of ICE, suspending virtually all enforcement action. Atlanta had been awarded the 1996 Olympic games, and was so far behind on the construction schedule that the metro area was in danger of having the games taken away. They *encouraged* Mexicans and Central Americans to come here, and asked Mexican government representatives to help get the word out.
After the Olympucs, there was a huge construction boom and construction labor shortage so the pull continued.
c) The United States, and specifically Congress and President Clinton, adopted laws that led to the permanent immigration of many millions of people from Latin America to the United States.
The Clinton-Gingrich immigration law of 1996 undermined what had been a circular, temporary migration pattern, where people would come for a few months for seasonal work in harvests and construction, and then return to Mexico.
By ratcheting up border enforcement, it became too expensive and uncertain to go back and forth, so these temporary immigrants became year-round ones. But as such they began looking for permanent, not seasonal employment, and jobs were plentiful in the last few years of the Clinton Administration. And that led to more people coming, initially for the seasonal work the undocumented immigrants who were staying year-round had abandoned.
And the ones that settled here brought their wives and children from Mexico or Central America or formed new relationships here. They also helped other members of their extended families and friends to come here.
U.S. policies led to boom in the Latino population of the 1990s. Latinos merely did what people have been doing since our remote ancestors hundreds of thousands of years ago: Moving to other areas in search of better opportunities. The very same reason the European ancestors of many other Americans came here.
The damage the driver’s license rip-off does goes way beyond the financial cost to Latinos. We are systematically racially profiled. The entire community is alienated from civic institutions and especially law enforcement.
I have been stopped and pulled over by cops for supposed traffic violations many times in the last few years, including two tickets for failing to stop for stop signs that were completely covered by vegetation, both of which I beat; failure to have the new sticker on my license plate by the date of my birthday, having been stopped on my birthday, with the charge being dismissed because it had to be AFTER my birthday; failure to signal a turn on a completely deserted road at 2:00 AM as I was going to work (dismissed when the police officer failed to show up), failure to use my seat belt (pulled over on I-285 during the rush hour), for which I paid the $15 fine, and defective equipment (burnt-out tail light) for which I got a formal, written warning. Why? Because I am Latino and was driving a nearly 20-year-old Honda Civic.
After my civic died and I got a new Honda FIT, two and a half years ago, I haven’t been stopped once, because with a new car I no longer fit the profile.
The reason I got so many citations, all of which I beat save the seat belt (which was so little it wasn’t worth fighting) is NOT because the cops who stopped me were outraged by my egregious bad driving, especially once I pointed out that the stop signs were covered by foliage or the road was deserted at 2:00 AM, but because they needed to cover their ass for having stopped me in the first place. They were really fishing for undocumented Latinos they could arrest for failure to have a driver’s license, and must have been disappointed upon encountering a man nearing retirement who simply saw no need to buy a new car when his old one was still working.
Also involved here is the issue of our police forces. I think we have to reject concepts like “war on drugs” “war on crime” and even –to a certain degree– “law enforcement” in relation to laws which are primarily used as a replacement for taxes. We should return to the concept that the police are “officers of the peace,” not warriors.
By definition, being an “unauthorized immigrant” is a crime. You have violated the immigration laws of the US.
“Being an unauthorized immigrant in the United States is not a crime.”
Being a illegal alien is a crime and it’s a deportable crime. Being deported and coming back is a felony. Illegal aliens have to break the law being here everyday to live.
I’am black, in the last 30 years i have been stopped twice for speeding and had one parking ticket. Speeding was just warnings. My last speeding ticket was 41 years ago. Hispanics/Latinos come from countries who have no respect for the law and this no respect is passed down to their children.
No matter what color you are if you don’t obey the traffic laws you are a criminal. I like how they try and drag citizens into this to get a break for illegals. Everyone has to go by the same standard, illegal aliens should not be driving period.
” I have been stopped and pulled over by cops for supposed traffic violations many times in the last few years, including . . . [for] defective equipment (burnt-out tail light) for which I got a formal, written warning. Why? Because I am Latino and was driving a nearly 20-year-old Honda Civic.
After my civic died and I got a new Honda FIT, two and a half years ago, I haven’t been stopped once, because with a new car I no longer fit the profile.”
I am sympathetic to a lot of what you’re saying here, but comments like the one above don’t help your argument at all. I’m sure you didn’t stop being Hispanic (which seems to be the profile you’re concerned with being the cause of you getting pulled over so often). What your comment equates to is that you got a warning for having a burnt-out tail light on an old car. Something that might cause ANYONE to get pulled over. The fact that you only got a warning — which is what happens in MOST cases to ANYONE — only confirms that the police did their job properly here as concern for your safety would mandate. The fact that your new car has working equipment and hasn’t resulted in a pull over only confirms that, in this case at least, everything went as it should have.
This is poor logic on your part. You’ve presented counter-evidence to your case. Take a deep breathe and focus on the stuff that is actually racist or unjust.
@Jose
My apologies. No editing permitted. I didn’t read carefully enough. I should have written “you didn’t stop being Latino”. You never claimed to be Hispanic. My bad for inattention to detail.
The thing that this article does not highlight is that under the Clinton-Gingrich immigration and welfare laws passed in 1996, unauthorized immigrants are not allowed to get drivers’ licenses, and this was re-enforced by the internal passport system known as the “rea
It says something about the level of fascism involved here, that I assumed when I read the headline that it referred to former Soviet Georgia.
The right way to handle fines is to do it all in TIME. The punishment should be for however many hours, which you can pay in cash according to whatever your wages are. If you don’t have sufficient wages, the government should have to come up with something, probably involving a stick with a nail at the end of it and the abominable mess of trash to be found alongside the highways. Though it wouldn’t hurt if they would look for more educational things to put people to – ideally, the people should come out with some training and a work reference, instead of a criminal record.
A consequence of having fines as a matter of time is that all of a sudden the rich wouldn’t just laugh and zoom past the rest of us like they usually do. Which I happen to think is a good thing since whether you get hit by a rich speeder or a poor one you’re just as likely to get hurt.
So what would be the right way to handle unlicensed driving, which is a bad thing? I mean, I get it, police pull over people of colour proportionally much more than they pull over white people so that law enforcement of any kind falls disproportionately on people of colour, and that is an injustice which must be remedied in all circumstances. But this article seems to suggest we should all just relax about unlicensed driving, because many unlicensed drivers are safe and otherwise law-abiding. Which is pretty much true about anything: mostly you don’t need car insurance or home insurance, mostly you don’t need to lock your house, mostly it’s perfectly fine to use your cell phone when you drive, mostly you don’t need your kid in a car seat, sure. But that’s not really the pointy end of any of those sticks.
The right way is obviously not to make a driver “unlicensed” solely for failing to pay a fine. Oh, I’m not saying failure to pay won’t have consequences – they should just be the usual sort of consequences that come when you don’t pay the credit card bill or the mortgage, which are more than bad enough already.
There is a bait and switch that happens when you propose that “licensed = safe”, then take away the license when you know it has nothing at all to do with safety, only ability to pay. It is simply a deception.
It’s called pressure. Do the right thing, pay your fines and obey the law. Some people would never pay their fines if there were not any consequents.
I PROTEST. I have no problem getting people off the road who have no drivers license. It’s more complicated than you think. If you are killed or a member of your family or many of them are killed by an unlicensed driver, you are going to say “they should not have been on the road”.
PLAYING CAT AND MOUSE IS NOT A SOLUTION
We are not talking “i don’t have my license with me issues”, we are talking “i don’t want a license” or “i failed the drivers test” or “i am not a citizen of the u.s. but i can drive so don’t worry about it”.
Be serious. Then there is the insurance cost which you pay up because some do not. Be serious.
Ask the farmers in Alabama how things worked out for them when they did the immigrant crackdown thingie in that state.
That was a illegal alien crackdown. Framers were greedy and should have been hurt. Ask the thousands of American families who have had a family member killed by a illegal alien, how’s that working out? Check out NC child rapes.
http://www.illegalaliencrimereport.com/
March 2015 Child Rapes:
http://ncfire.info/march2015.pdf
You say you are black, but have never been pulled over for DWB in spite of driving for over 30 years. If true, you have been extremely lucky, to say the least. THOUSANDS killed by illegal aliens? Nice little right wing site you quoted. Joe Arpaio would be proud of you.
Illegal alien crackdown.
That’s nice, but do you know what the end result to the farmers was? You didn’t mention the crux of my comment.
The problem is people who drive without a license – how do you get them off the road?.? It’s a big problem in NY – people get their licenses repeatedly suspended…. In California you can get a work permit to drive back and forth to work. I do not have an answer….but neither does anyone else?.?
49.1 percent of the population of the US is male, but over 98 percent of people convicted of forcible rape are male. Obviously, this is proof of rampant sexism in US law enforcement.
Actually, this is another example of a failure to apply proper statistical procedure. If you want to examine whether a particular law is being applied in a discriminatory manner, you have to identify the populations to compare. Simply comparing what percentage of whites are convicted compared to the percentage of latinos is wrong, unless you can show that the percentage of whites driving without a license is the same as the percentage of latinos driving without one.
If illegal immigrants cannot obtain a license, and there is a significant number of illegal latino immigrants in the county, it stands to reason that there is a higher percentage of latinos convicted of driving without a license. To make the case this article does authentically, there needs to be a comparison of populations of drivers without licenses. If the county population i total of latinos is 7 percent, but the percentage of latinos driving without a license is 17 percent, then the arrest rate is consistent with the rate of violation in the population.
I don’t know what percentage of licenseless drivers in any of these counties is white, black, latino. and neither do the authors. Without that data, all this article shows is that the authors can’t provide valid statistics.
I see lots of complaining but no solution.
Funny how the far-right racists never advocate attacking the cause with employer sanctions. The Clinton Administration was dumb enough to send INS agents into the Georgia onion fields during harvest to bust the illegals. The Georgia Congressional delegation went ballistic. See http://www.scpr.org/blogs/multiamerican/2011/05/24/7429/economics-vs-enforcement-the-long-running-vidalia-/.
They come here for jobs. No jobs, no illegals. Effective employer sanctions means no jobs.
That’s not too hard for conservative to understand…or is it?
But definitely too hard for a Trumpie.
Employers who employ/ed non-citizens without work permits should have to pay such huge fines that they should be afraid to hire them.
Of course, we must not impose penalties on LAWBREAKERS, especially if they are poor and/or in this country ILLEGALLY.
THIS is why Trump is gaining so much support – we’ve had enough of this “anything goes” lunatic-liberal philosophy…
Yeah, when he gets elected he can waterboard and “worse” to these criminals.
Typical Liberal Crybaby Hyperbole.
Do you ever have anything of substance to say, or are you limited to junior high style rhetoric?
There are 250,000,000 south of U.S. border living under $10/day. The u.s. granted an amnesty in the mid 80’s. It is possible that some of the two hundred fifty million people are hoping for another.
Kudos to Georgia. Undocumented (ILLEGAL ALIEN) immigrants are criminals to begin with in that they have violated Federal Law when they invaded the country. Driving w/o or with a suspended license is a matter of public safety and it matters not if you are black, brown, white, red, purple or green; you are a menace to others.
Bullshit. You’re a menace if you’re driving recklessly whether you have a driver’s license or not. Merely not having a license doesn’t make you a menace.
Invaded? So starting a small business, employing others, paying taxes, contributing to the community is an invasion? You are truly ignorant.
The purpose of having a license is to make sure that you are certified to drive so that you are not, from the perspective of victims of unlicensed drivers, a menace to those who were victims or would be.
We are not born to drive. It is a learned skill. ALSO INSURANCE IS REQUIRED. America has regulations for safety reasons. Some countries do not.
“So starting a small business, employing others, paying taxes, contributing to the community is an invasion? You are truly ignorant.”
Federal law says you can’t be in the country illegally from square one. Illegal aliens can not work in this country, it’s against federal law.
Wasn’t this the same thing that Ferguson Missouri was doing to blacks?
Bottom feeding off the poor?
Are the American cities so hard up for cash that they have to act like thugs & loan sharks to pay their bills?
And there is wonder why America has over 1,000,000 in prison. Felony Driving?
Go to Great Briton -for example, you can get a drivers license with ease. Not Georgia.
I would like to say that America is better than that, but apparently not.
“Go to Great Briton -for example, you can get a drivers license with ease.”
Wrong. To get a UK licence an alien must show a valid residence permit, amongst other things.
https://www.gov.uk/id-for-driving-licence
Drivers should be licensed and insured, and penalised for failing to do so. The purpose of the requirement is to make roads safer. It is a legitimate purpose and it must be enforced.
What is completely bonkers is to tie this to immigration policy, which results in defeating the achievements of road safety policy. (Likewise, suspension of licence for failure to pay child support: how does that make the roads safer for the rest of us, irrespective of the reprobation we all have in respect of bad parenting?…)
Legislators should get a grip and stop adopting mutually incompatible policies. Road safety is not the relevant policy area to administer immigration.
Amending the law to enable applications for a licence irrespective of residency status is the only reasonable option.
Except for the fact that in the US a drivers license is tied to voting, and a lot of other things non-citizens are not allowed to participate in.
Becoming a citizen in the US is important. It (should) requires you enter the US legally.
Amending the law is a ridiculous idea.
Incompatible law? If it accomplishes the task so what?
Who needs Donald Drumpf, when you have states like Georgia?
Looks like Georgia is de-evolving back to the Old south.
No. Nice try though. People should just get a drivers license and obey the law.