▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ⟶
It’s not easy for outsiders to sort through all the competing claims about Brazil’s political crisis and the ongoing effort to oust its president, Dilma Rousseff, who won re-election a mere 18 months ago with 54 million votes. But the most important means for understanding the truly anti-democratic nature of what’s taking place is to look at the person whom Brazilian oligarchs and their media organs are trying to install as president: the corruption-tainted, deeply unpopular, oligarch-serving Vice President Michel Temer (above). Doing so shines a bright light on what’s really going on, and why the world should be deeply disturbed.
The New York Times’s Brazil bureau chief, Simon Romero, interviewed Temer this week, and this is how his excellent article begins:
RIO DE JANEIRO — One recent poll found that only 2 percent of Brazilians would vote for him. He is under scrutiny over testimony linking him to a colossal graft scandal. And a high court justice ruled that Congress should consider impeachment proceedings against him.
Michel Temer, Brazil’s vice president, is preparing to take the helm of Brazil next month if the Senate decides to put President Dilma Rousseff on trial.
How can anyone rational believe that anti-corruption anger is driving the elite effort to remove Dilma when they are now installing someone as president who is accused of corruption far more serious than she is? It’s an obvious farce. But there’s something even worse.
The person who is third in line to the presidency, right behind Temer, has been exposed as shamelessly corrupt: the evangelical zealot and House speaker Eduardo Cunha. He’s the one who spearheaded the impeachment proceedings even though he got caught last year squirreling away millions of dollars in bribes in Swiss bank accounts, after having lied to Congress when falsely denying that he had any accounts in foreign banks. When Romero asked Temer about his posture toward Cunha once he takes power, this is how Temer responded:Mr. Temer defended himself and top allies who are under a cloud of accusations in the scheme. He expressed support for Eduardo Cunha, the scandal-plagued speaker of the lower house who is leading the impeachment effort in Congress, saying he would not ask Mr. Cunha to resign. Mr. Cunha will be the next in line for the presidency if Mr. Temer takes over.
By itself, this demonstrates the massive scam taking place here. As my partner, David Miranda, wrote this morning in his Guardian op-ed: “It has now become clear that corruption is not the cause of the effort to oust Brazil’s twice-elected president; rather, corruption is merely the pretext.” In response, Brazil’s media elites will claim (as Temer did) that once Dilma is impeached, then the other corrupt politicians will most certainly be held accountable, but they know this is false, and Temer’s shocking support for Cunha makes that clear. Indeed, press reports show that Temer is planning to install as attorney general — the key government contact for the corruption investigation — a politician specifically urged for that position by Cunha. As Miranda’s op-ed explains, “The real plan behind Rousseff’s impeachment is to put an end to the ongoing investigation, thus protecting corruption, not punishing it.”
But there’s one more vital motive driving all of this. Look at who is going to take over Brazil’s economy and finances once Dilma’s election victory is nullified. Two weeks ago, Reuters reported that Temer’s leading choice to run the central bank is the chair of Goldman Sachs in Brazil, Paulo Leme. Today, Reuters reported that “Murilo Portugal, the head of Brazil’s most powerful banking industry lobby” — and a long-time IMF official — “has emerged as a strong candidate to become finance minister if Temer takes power.” Temer also vowed that he would embrace austerity for Brazil’s already-suffering population: He “intends to downsize the government” and “slash spending.”
In an earning calls last Friday with JP Morgan, the celebratory CEO of Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior SA, Rubens Amaral, explicitly described Dilma’s impeachment as “one of the first steps to normalization in Brazil,” and said that if Temer’s new government implements the “structural reforms” that the financial community desires, then “definitely there will be opportunities.” News of Temer’s preferred appointees strongly suggests Mr. Amaral — and his fellow plutocrats — will be pleased.
Meanwhile, the dominant Brazilian media organs of Globo, Abril (Veja), Estadão — which Miranda’s op-ed discusses at length — are virtually unified in support of impeachment, as in No Dissent Allowed, and have been inciting the street protests from the start. Why is that revealing? Reporters Without Borders just yesterday released its 2016 Press Freedom Rankings, and ranked Brazil 103 in the world because of violence against journalists but also because of this key fact: “Media ownership continues to be very concentrated, especially in the hands of big industrial families that are often close to the political class.” Is it not crystal clear what’s going on here?
So to summarize: Brazilian financial and media elites are pretending that corruption is the reason for removing the twice-elected president of the country as they conspire to install and empower the country’s most corrupted political figures. Brazilian oligarchs will have succeeded in removing from power a moderately left-wing government that won four straight elections in the name of representing the country’s poor, and are literally handing control over the Brazilian economy (the world’s seventh largest) to Goldman Sachs and bank industry lobbyists.
This fraud being perpetrated here is as blatant as it is devastating. But it’s the same pattern that has been repeatedly seen around the world, particularly in Latin America, when a tiny elite wages a self-protective, self-serving war on the fundamentals of democracy. Brazil, the world’s fifth most populous country, has been an inspiring example of how a young democracy can mature and thrive. But now, those democratic institutions and principles are being fully assaulted by the very same financial and media factions that suppressed democracy and imposed tyranny in that country for decades.
But the “story” behind the story: It is no news that Right in Brazil and the USA have always “operated” to oust the Lula&Dilma governments. But only the Presidents of Bolivia and Ecuador had ousted the U.S. “ops” and then ALSO (ALSO !) warned about the “izquierda falsa” – the “False Left” which is the CIA “fallback” alternate operation in Latin America: The “popular protests” against Dilma Rousseff had been decided by the “False Left” in Brazil in May 2011 with the pretext of stopping the 2014 Soccer Worldcup which was a national project supported by most Brazilians: “Comite da Copa” operation. The street protests started in 2012 and increased in 2013 but always involving ultra-left groups opposed to the PT of Lula and Dilma. The biggest Communist Party PCdoB asked its members and groups NOT to participate in those protests. The “False Left” held meetings in Berlin/Germany in Oct. and Nov. 2013 and decided on a “campaign against the “government of Brazil in the Spring of 2014. Until Spring 2014 the Right had NOT protested in the streets against the Dilma government. Then as the “False Left” cranked up massive protests, suddenly the Right appeared also in the protests. At the culmination of the Soccer World Cup in July – one of the organizer of the “False Left” met in Rio and Sao Paulo with one editor of a “left newspaper” in Berlin, and an “editor” of a German “leftish” newspaper with links to Washington. Do not look now, but you read it here first: The “False Left” is now activated to attack the Maduro government in Venezuela while it is already in a survival struggle against the CIA-supported Right. Watch the “anti-arco-minero” operation !
It’s no surprise that Rousseff’s political opponents would use any means to remove her. It also no surprise that they, too, are corrupt. The question is why Rousseff, and her party, could not work out that by being corrupt as well, they were making themselves vulnerable. It seems that corruption is embedded in the fabric of the elite Brazilian society (and most other countries as well).
Better they than these revolutionaries commies that are stealing us since late 80’s.
ESTA QUADRILHA QUE SE APODEROU DO PAÍS NÃO NOS REPRESENTA! DE JEITO NENHUM.
NÓS, NAÇÃO BRASILEIRA, NÃO SOMOS ASSIM!
NÓS, POVO BRASILEIRO, NÃO SOMOS ASSIM!
TENTARÃO FAZER COM QUE VOCÊ ACREDITE NISSO, MAS NÓS NÃO SOMOS ASSIM!
PARA NOSSO AZAR, A ELITE ENDINHEIRA É ASSIM MESMO! VENDEM SUA ALMA PARA O CAPETA POR UNS TROCADOS, POR ALGUNS DINHEIROS.
“Hoje, pela manhã, recebi uma mensagem no facebook transmitida a mim por uma amiga e leitora assídua aqui do meu blogue e com quem também compartilho informações ali, bem como em nossas vidas pessoais, em encontros casuais lá no prédio em que moramos em Belo Horizonte.
A mensagem era muito extensa mesmo. Mas acredito que esta crônica aqui será ainda muito maior e muito mais enfadonha. Só siga a leitura se estiver com tempo e com paciência, é a minha sugestão.”
>> https://gustavohorta.wordpress.com/2016/04/27/hoje-pela-manha-e-deu-nisso-uma-retrospectiva-bem-cansativa/
We must adjust the glasses to understand the Brazilian crisis. It’s a matter of focus. If we use only juridical arguments, we will not understand what happens in Brazil today. There are social, economic, historical and ethnic arguments for this political-institutional crisis. The Impeachment is provided in the brazilian’s constitution, it is a legal instrument, but it can only be used in specific, exact conditions, it can not generate doubts. The “crime” assigned to Dilma Rousseff is no consensus in legal circles. You must to do it intentionally and there is no deceit in the act of Dilma Rousseff. We need proof that she obtained personal profits, and there is no evidence. And even if she had committed such “crimes”, the deposition of a president as punishment in such cases is comparable to someone kill the child because he spent too much water while showering. Moreover, this “crime” is committed by 70% of the country’s municipalities, and 55% of governors committed this crime this year. Even Barack Obama committed this “crime” in the last two years in the USA. As I said it’s a matter of focus, it is necessary to expand the focus. Brazil is a young democracy with only 30 years. Our republican phase has 127 years, we had 42 presidents, among them only 18 presidents have been elected democratically, which only 11 finished their mandates. That is, Brazil has a chronic problem of coexistence with democracy: 75% of Brazilian presidents commanded the country without being elected. It is a democracy that weeps more breathing. There are in Brazil oligarchies political and economic groups that often compete for power among themselves, sometimes unite to overthrow agendas contrary to their own. What do they have in common? They can not live with the democratic voting. They do not hesitate to overthrow a government in a period of unpopularity or political weakness. The world has seen that Brazilian congressmen were able to run over to a democratically elected mandate. In the name of God, family, real estate brokers and a military torturer who put live mice in the vaginas of their victims women, a conference, which 60% of its members are defendants in corruption cases, voted to bring down a president who is not worthy in any process. One of the rare Brazilian politicians who are not accused of illicit enrichment, according to the NYT. In addition the government suffers a crisis of corruption across all the political spectrum. A curious fact: The hegemony of the Brazilian press, visual and written, belongs to just one family, which is linked to groups interested in the economic benefits of deposition Dilma Rousseff. What we have today is a broad propaganda, inflating the middle class (Brazil has 80% of blacks and mestizos, look for this ratio in the photos of Brazilian demonstrations against the president) to convince the country that the departure of President eliminate the problem chronic corruption. Pay attention: A parallel with American history was the attempted impeachment of US President Anthony Johnson. He assumed the presidency after the Civil War. It was extremely unpopular, his government was extremely asked about corruption, and his actions were too harsh. The impeachment was defeated by just one vote in the Senate. He is still considered one of the worst American presidents, but the defeat of Impeachment is considered an institutional and appreciation of American democracy jump. Brazil is going through this phase of its democracy, and the country can not overcome it as surpassed the USA. What do we have now? Brazilian congressmen defendants in proceedings in court (against corruption) can bring down a president elected with 54 million votes, which was never accused of any crime. Lawmakers expect the current vice president (cited in many cases of corruption) stop investigations. Both of them are now the most interested in the overthrow of the president. Lawmakers do not want to be arrested, and the vice president wants the presidency. It is a parliamentary coup. It is important to say that we are not in a parliamentary system. The president is the popular demonstration. To overthrow a president is required legal justification. Otherwise it blow! Repair your glasses: The world is seeing today a coup in Brazil!
Wouldn’t this takeover by Temer and Cunha force them to inherit the government at a time of severe economic recession and fiscal cuts, at least through 2018? And if you are a politician considering running for president from the Left (Marina da Silva, Lula), wouldn’t it help you that Dilma gets removed, the PMDB and the “elites” have to preside over difficult ugly times and anti-corruption investigations, so that you can run again in 2019 as the candidate for change? I don’t disagree with Greenwald’s assessment, but I think it paints a one-sided picture. Whoever takes over if Dilma is ousted, inherits a vicious economic-political cycle.
The world already sees as a coup. No return. Brazilian democracy is a joke told by the mouth of rotten congressmen. Or reconsiders this absurd impeachment without legal basis or that generation really know what is political instability. So far what happened was testing. What this irresponsible corrupt, who take advantage of people who want an end to corruption, they want to impose on the country is hit, simply because the government program they support would not win any election. Why are they afraid of elections? Rape the constitution to forge a bogus impeachment and oppose the elections ?? That’s right? The Party of the Brazilian DEMOCRATIC Mobilization (PMDB), political party vice president FEAR is against elections? It’s a military coup without, but as blow as resulting in the death of Vargas, the Jango of exile and in preventing the JK return. The oligarchs, industrialists, the media and the financial sector do not accept a popular government. They never accepted the permanence of a popular government. Incompetence is no cause for impeachment. Crime is because of Impeachment, in which case there is even legal consensus on the crime. Incompetence collapses at the polls. The Liberal Macri Neo is legitimate pq won an election, here Temer even deserves respect pq begs the elections. Only elections will unite this country again, or prepare for a catastrophic Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, awaiting the demonstrations.
“….handing control over the Brazilian economy (the world’s seventh largest) to Goldman Sachs and bank industry lobbyists”. All I can tell you is that investors and speculators made a lot of money last year under this chaotic government. I bought many 2050 bonds yielding 7.50% + CPI which generations of brazilians will have to pay high interests for decades. PT means more risk for the country, hence higher interest rates and more carry/profits for investors like me. So pls dont tell me that the country will be assaulted by Temer & co when is the opposite. Brazil is already paying much less interests (6.30 for 2050 bonds) based on the prospects of a reformist government.
P.S: I dont like Temer/Cunha either and I’m against the impeachement. But pls stop this b… about evil financial sector, etc.
You need to write a story about how Clinton is using her Super PAC “Correct the Record” to shut down pro-Bernie FB groups by posting porn in them and then mass reporting them. She’s infringing our free speech rights online and gaslighting the shit out of a genuine grassroots movement.
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE CRISIS BRAZILIAN POLITICS.
We must adjust the glasses to understand the Brazilian crisis. It’s a matter of focus. If we use only juridical arguments, we will not understand what happens in Brazil today. There are social, economic, historical and ethnic arguments for this political-institutional crisis. The Impeachment is provided in the brazilian’s constitution, it is a legal instrument, but it can only be used in specific, exact conditions, it can not generate doubts. The “crime” assigned to Dilma Rousseff is no consensus in legal circles. You must to do it intentionally and there is no deceit in the act of Dilma Rousseff. We need proof that she obtained personal profits, and there is no evidence. And even if she had committed such “crimes”, the deposition of a president as punishment in such cases is comparable to someone kill the child because he spent too much water while showering. Moreover, this “crime” is committed by 70% of the country’s municipalities, and 55% of governors committed this crime this year. Even Barack Obama committed this “crime” in the last two years in the USA. As I said it’s a matter of focus, it is necessary to expand the focus. Brazil is a young democracy with only 30 years. Our republican phase has 127 years, we had 42 presidents, among them only 18 presidents have been elected democratically, which only 11 finished their mandates. That is, Brazil has a chronic problem of coexistence with democracy: 75% of Brazilian presidents commanded the country without being elected. It is a democracy that weeps more breathing. There are in Brazil oligarchies political and economic groups that often compete for power among themselves, sometimes unite to overthrow agendas contrary to their own. What do they have in common? They can not live with the democratic voting. They do not hesitate to overthrow a government in a period of unpopularity or political weakness. The world has seen that Brazilian congressmen were able to run over to a democratically elected mandate. In the name of God, family, real estate brokers and a military torturer who put live mice in the vaginas of their victims women, a conference, which 60% of its members are defendants in corruption cases, voted to bring down a president who is not worthy in any process. One of the rare Brazilian politicians who are not accused of illicit enrichment, according to the NYT. In addition the government suffers a crisis of corruption across all the political spectrum. A curious fact: The hegemony of the Brazilian press, visual and written, belongs to just one family, which is linked to groups interested in the economic benefits of deposition Dilma Rousseff. What we have today is a broad propaganda, inflating the middle class (Brazil has 80% of blacks and mestizos, look for this ratio in the photos of Brazilian demonstrations against the president) to convince the country that the departure of President eliminate the problem chronic corruption. Pay attention: A parallel with American history was the attempted impeachment of US President Anthony Johnson. He assumed the presidency after the Civil War. It was extremely unpopular, his government was extremely asked about corruption, and his actions were too harsh. The impeachment was defeated by just one vote in the Senate. He is still considered one of the worst American presidents, but the defeat of Impeachment is considered an institutional and appreciation of American democracy jump. Brazil is going through this phase of its democracy, and the country can not overcome it as surpassed the USA. What do we have now? Brazilian congressmen defendants in proceedings in court (against corruption) can bring down a president elected with 54 million votes, which was never accused of any crime. Lawmakers expect the current vice president (cited in many cases of corruption) stop investigations. Both of them are now the most interested in the overthrow of the president. Lawmakers do not want to be arrested, and the vice president wants the presidency. It is a parliamentary coup. It is important to say that we are not in a parliamentary system. The president is the popular demonstration. To overthrow a president is required legal justification. Otherwise it blow! Repair your glasses: The world is seeing today a coup in Brazil!
This coup is also being fueled by the media group, REDE GLOBO. It is clear that the elite want to remove a democratically elected leader under the pretense and gals justification of corruption. IT is really a COUP. It is essential that this coup attempt is stopped, so that the financial control of Brazil’s economy is not handed over to Goldman Sachs and bank industry lobbyists. Democracy is under attack in Brazil, and this article clearly shows who is behind this.
Yoooooo ippopotamo
This post is funny because you judge all of Brazil as followers of Temer and Cunha.
You can’t that Brazil is going through a revolution in i’ts very core of political POV.
We don’t want Dilma’s impeach so Temer and Cunha can rule the nation. We want her Impeach because her election was a total manipulation, and after her we’ll go after Temer, Cunha, Aecio Neves (leader of the oposite party) and all the corrupts in this country.
You americans talk and judge out country if you knew anything, as if you spent your entire life here, and suffered what we’ve suffered..
I appreciate your cover on the topic, but please don’t be a sellout of the current government,get to know better the issue before you write a line about it.
Who are you trying to kid ? Dilma was democratically elected, and once Temer has been installed, do you really believe that he will then ever face impeachment ? This piece does not in any way “sell out to the current government” but it does expose who is behind the impeachment, their questionable motives, and how it threatens democracy. Nice attempt to manipulate readers perception of the article, but a failure I’m afraid, quite easy to see through.
Wow, what a petromess, Batman. How terrifying to see oligarchy rolling so efficiently! Fasci never had it so good. Did you know reading your site makes me miserable, and I had to give it up to stay alive? Helpless, that’s how I feel when I read here. You guidos could use a bit’o positive psychology, but then how would you sell your hopeless selves?
It is not neurotic to want a break from all this muckety. How you take it 24/7 is a misery to me.
Go and read the Fascist Gazette or The Daily Fascist or Fox News instead then if you really can’t bear to read the truth. reading your comment has made me miserable, as your criticism of The Intercept shows that you do not seem to understand the importance of defending democracy, and the other human rights that The Intercept defends.
Considering the profiles and backgrounds of the people you mention, I wouldn’t be suprised if the New Development Bank (aka BRICS Devt. Bank) were the real target here…
Orwell forgot one : “truth is lie”…
Mr. Glenn forgot to mention that 88 million people didn’t vote for Dilma, and she won by just 3 million.
He forgot to mention that during the last 2 years unemployment jumped from 7.2 million to 10.5 million people.
That in 2013 millions of people went to the streets to ask for a political reform. She fooled people and from 2015 they went to streets again several times, but now they are asking for her to resign.
And most important, Brazilian Federal Accounts Court ruled that Dilma broke the law several times to mask the real situation of Brazilian economy, in 2014 to win elections and continued doing this in 2015: http://www.latinpost.com/articles/85356/20151008/brazil-corruption-scandal-dilma-rousseff-broke-the-law-auditors-say.htm
Sounds just like the USA , but here the middle class have also seen their income fall massively, and many jobs are now going abroad. Here the top 2% richest Americans now own 70% of the wealth.
And you, sir, are leaving out that the 2013 manifestations had NOTHING to do with the current manifestations. You also, like Globo, is mentioning the new manifestations like they were all one sided, while completely ignoring the millions that ALSO took the street to speak against the impeachment. Finally, you also left out that, in response of the 2013 manifestations, Dilma DID submit to the formal demands of the manifestations and followed through with over half of them (the others she couldn’t do alone because she is not a dictator, they went into congress and congress shot them down).
Another thing you leave out, purposefully, is that Dilma wrote an anti-corruption package in 2015 in answer to the protests. This package would include dramatic, extreme punishments to corruption. ANY politician caught with proof on a corruption scheme would need to pay back to the public coffers DOUBLE the amount that they stole and be released from office. Corporations found to also take part in the corruption scheme could have as much as 20% of their income taken. What happened to this package? It is in congress, awaiting approval. Why wasn’t it approved? If I really need to answer this you are a complete moron. Why wasn’t it just shot down? Because at this time of scrutiny, simply shooting it down could make the news. Cunha is waiting for calmer waters to personally rip that packed with his own hands.
sounds eerily familiar to me. see detroit.
This “article” is chock full of lies and partial info. Greenwald is an accomplice mouthpiece for PT, whose corruption and incompetence has made the party a dwindling, despised outcast in Brazil because it has stolen and now it lies in a way that only a handful of crooks take seriously.
Can you details of what you consider to be lies in the article, and perhaps also provide some credible evidence to support your claim that any of the information is false ? I think that your political bias against the PT has coloured your interpretation of the article, which is not a piece supporting the PT. It is an exposure of what and who is behind the impeachment, their motivations, and how this threatens democracy.
Still waiting on the commentator Truth to substantiate his claim that this article is chock full of.ies. Guess he is struggling to back up this false, and politically motivated statement. Just proves that the far right wing elite are full of shit, and unable to cope when challenged. Lol
This is shockingly naive. The Brazilian elections were fraudulent: the machines leave no record and areas of the country in which all polls showed the president losing big with all breakdowns had her winning big. The machine literally have no means of being audited and some have been demonstrated to have not provided correct counts. Software to switch votes was even found in a few (do your research.)
The president used to be the Head of PetroBras when all the corruption was going on, but she miraculously wasn’t involved.
The President was part of a terrorist group that robbed banks and killed people.
The are investigations from the Justice Department that are uncovering evidence that under almost any other country’s laws would land her and all her PT party collaborators in jail for well over a decade.
Her admin has crippled the country in so many ways. Her speeches make Bush sound very smart and coherent.
You, Sir, are a fraud. You know nothing about Brazil or the actual circumstances. You should be ashamed.
It is yourself that should be ashamed, for being critical of what is a well written and truthful piece, defending democracy. Your conspiracy theory about machines rigging the election is ridiculous. Your claim that other countries would jail the entire PT party are equally ridiculous. In the USA Clapper did not even get jailed for lying to congress, and President Bush wasn’t even held accountable for war crimes, and for taking America to war against Iraq under completely false pretenses. The article is right to criticize the motivation behind the impeachment, because it is an elitist right wing attempt to overthrow a democratically elected leader.
Hoo Boy! The pro-coup Brazilian trolls are thick here. I commend them on their English fluency. Hmm, I wonder why someone in a big Portuguese-speaking country, surrounded by Spanish-speaking countries for 1000’s of km around, are so fluent in English? Maybe becasue English fluency is needed when one is doing business in lower Manhattan?
The pro coup trolls do seem to have amazing command of English, and agree that they will all be attacking from the US. Probably Wall Street or originating from the NSA. It’s a coordinated attack to discredit a piece that has exposed them to the bone.
Everything Mr. Greenwald says make sense and I share his dismay, but he never addresses the charges against the current and former President or their associates. The alleged corruption may not be what is driving the effort to oust her, but is the corruption real or isn’t it? If it is, we have another case of moderately left of center governments simply paving the way, by their own conduct or policies, for the return of an emboldened and often more radical right-wing politics.
The COUP has been fueled and driven by the media (REDE GLOBO) from the so-called “mensalão”. We, my family and all my friends decided that we will not buy anything, anything, from companies that advertise their products on that media group.
Temer – some time back – had radical plastic surgery. He had a Hornectomy.
He also appears to be a little fellow with a bigly ego. These types are easily insulted as they rely on their fascade to rob people and fool their mates. Authors in the southern americas need to sling the insults while it is still legal. But i would advise some to have their bags packed and ready to GTFO.
i dont really understand all this, but since the US is so good at coming and and taking over, are we waiting to do that? thx
The u.s. is not going to take over. We (the planet generally) have entered a new phase of global domination. Ever see Never Say Never when Klaus plays Bond his video game Domination? Well the TPP is it. So much wealth and power have become concentrated in so few people that these people have a game. And we the people are on their board and we are the pieces. And it is a game for them. They have enough money to live their own solitary lives away from others but no, they have to play a game.
The u.s. itself is being dumped. The take-over game is no longer about corporations – that is already done. Now these monsters want to own governments.
I’ve read that you cannot buy a Mexican President. They are so crooked, you can only rent them. I guess the same can be said of Brazilian politics.
its the same as it ever was, and always will be forever.
Glenn is a counterintelligence spook, he sells the false dichotomy: ‘look how good our faux-left hero is by focusing on how bad her fake adversaries are,’ rather than just explaining that Bilderberg is in full control of both fake factions. It’s pro wrestling and Glenn is just the corporate good cop.
Like I suggested, Glenn, signs of the apocalypse. “Dogs and cats sleeping together! Mass hysteria…”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/koch-clinton-president-republicans_us_571c35c5e4b0d912d5fee371
Your link to Billionaire industrialist Charles Koch … said Democrat Hillary Clinton might make a better president than the candidates in the Republican field.
pretty much says it all right there.
HEY BERNIE…
It is true that Temer and co. are corrupt and want Dilma out.
But the author treats the proposed reforms like a plot by big business to keep the poor down.
In fact, budget cuts (pus some tax increases) and tax, entitlement, and regulatory reform are the textbook answers to Brazil’s problems. Everyone but doctrinaire leftists have been telling them for a long time this needs to be done. The chickens came home to roost last year and the economy is now in the tank. Dilma is politically incompetent and failed to make a deal with Congress. People are unemployed here and business is bad all around – that’s why she is being pushed out.
Glenn Wrote “when tiny elite wages a self-protective, self-serving war on the fundamentals of democracy.” Yes just like what has been taking place in the US for decades as the elite cannot get away with pillaging the world unless they either blind the American citizenry to it or secure their approval by their deceptive use of fear mongering that results in the profits of war and the reaping of the worlds resources for the benefit a corporatocracy at grave harm to the foundation of what is left of our Republics democratic principles.
The oliguric Brazilian financial and media elites in conjunction with Goldman Sachs and bank industry lobbyists are over throwing a democratically elected government. History just repeats itself for example:
“It’s well known that the 1953 coup was orchestrated by British forces and the fledgling CIA. But, officially, the CIA has never owned up to its role in the events. Now, says Foreign Policy, the National Security Archive has obtained a newly released copy of a document from the 1970s which details the 1953 coup and the CIA’s involvement.”
“The military coup that overthrew Mosadeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign policy,”
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/the-cia-finally-admitted-it-orchestrated-the-iranian-coup-of-1953-179889/#V2HqMtZwbdGdjdEA.99
This is so frightening. The oligarchs around the world seem to have perfected ways to work around democratic structures while still finding it convenient to play act the part of representatives of the people.
Good morning PI!
Oh they’re just your exceptional bunch or organized criminals robbing and looting the planet with profiteering wars and austerity so they can come to the rescue later, buy all the land and services and life support companies on the cheap and save everyone from starvation and disease.
Then to put the polish on their image they get their media to talk about their donations and take pictures of them all glitzied up so the forsaken population can wish to be like them and look up to them and worship them rather than chopping their evil heads off.
The same shi* is happenig now in Ukraine with population 42 mln. Can’t see the end of the hole we are in even in 50 years.
It’s not relevant what the motives are of her accusers are. Greenwald is motivated by a partisan love of left-wing economics but if the facts are there the motivation’s irrelevant.
There is probable cause for the Brazilian Congress to indict the President. She will mount a vigorous defense. The legal process of Impeachment will strengthen democracy. Brazilians are sick of corruption; this is a step forward not backwards.
Sounds an awful like Fast & Furious, and the IRS scandal, passing of Obamacare, and billions of other dollars that have been distributed by this administration under nefarious means.
Fascinating. Does this mean that Brazil isn’t better than America anymore (less racist, hegemonic, and more stylish) and that Glenn will be returning to the U.S.?
Let’s remind ourselves how President Obama made a hard right and signed a budget act to allow for Americans to be Disappeared. Currently the secret police network in the u.s. uses the “murder is suicide” method. I am guessing that they are looking forward to Glenn coming to the u.s. so that they can test run the rendition disappearing thing.
Alexandre
London Yesterday
There are in Brazil oligarchies political and economic groups that often compete for power among themselves, sometimes unite to overthrow agendas contrary to their own. What do they have in common? They can not live with the democratic voting. They do not hesitate to overthrow a government in a period of unpopularity or political weakness. The world has seen that Brazilian congressmen were able to run over to a democratically elected mandate. In the name of God, family, real estate brokers and a military torturer who put live mice in the vaginas of their victims women, a conference, which 60% of its members are defendants in corruption cases, voted to bring down a president who is not worthy in any process. One of the rare Brazilian politicians who are not accused of illicit enrichment, according to the NYT. In addition the government suffers a crisis of corruption across all the political spectrum. A curious fact: The hegemony of the Brazilian press, visual and written, belongs to just one family, which is linked to groups interested in the economic benefits of deposition Dilma Rousseff. What we have today is a broad propaganda, inflating the middle class (Brazil has 80% of blacks and mestizos, look for this ratio in the photos of Brazilian demonstrations against the president) to convince the country that the departure of President eliminate the problem chronicle of corruption.
We must adjust the glasses to understand the Brazilian crisis. It’s a matter of focus. If we use only juridical arguments, we will not understand what happens in Brazil today. There are social, economic, historical and ethnic arguments for this political-institutional crisis. The Impeachment is provided in the brazilian’s constitution, it is a legal instrument, but it can only be used in specific, exact conditions, it can not generate doubts. The “crime” assigned to Dilma Rousseff is no consensus in legal circles. You must to do it intentionally and there is no deceit in the act of Dilma Rousseff. We need proof that she obtained personal profits, and there is no evidence. And even if she had committed such “crimes”, the deposition of a president as punishment in such cases is comparable to someone kill the child because he spent too much water while showering. Moreover, this “crime” is committed by 70% of the country’s municipalities, and 55% of governors committed this crime this year. Even Barack Obama committed this “crime” in the last two years in the USA. As I said it’s a matter of focus, it is necessary to expand the focus. Brazil is a young democracy with only 30 years. Its a coup!!
Pay attention: A parallel with American history was the attempted impeachment of US President Anthony Johnson. He assumed the presidency after the Civil War. It was extremely unpopular, his government was extremely asked about corruption, and his actions were too harsh. The impeachment was defeated by just one vote in the Senate. He is still considered one of the worst American presidents, but the defeat of Impeachment is considered an institutional and appreciation of American democracy jump. Brazil is going through this phase of its democracy, and the country can not overcome it as surpassed the USA. What do we have now? Brazilian congressmen defendants in proceedings in court (against corruption) can bring down a president elected with 54 million votes, which was never accused of any crime. Lawmakers expect the current vice president (cited in many cases of corruption) stop investigations. Both of them are now the most interested in the overthrow of the president. Lawmakers do not want to be arrested, and the vice president wants the presidency. It is a parliamentary coup. It is important to say that we are not in a parliamentary system. The president is the popular demonstration. To overthrow a president is required legal justification. Otherwise it blow! Repair your glasses: The world is seeing today a coup in Brazil!
To quote a line from Rio Bravo,Mr.Silverhair looks like the cat that ate the chicken.
unless you just saw it, you gotta helluva memory.
and he sure does.
Dilma took her case to the UN in New York with much criticism back home – including members of the highest court:
“……..In another sign of her sinking fortunes, members of the nation’s highest court, which has already rejected appeals to have the impeachment petition quashed, added their voices to those criticizing her visit to New York, suggesting that future appeals to the court have little chance of succeeding.
“The responsible response would be to make a defense that respects Brazilian institutions and transmit a positive message about Brazil to the world — that it is solid democracy that works and that it’s institutions are responsible,” José Antonio Dias Toffoli, a Supreme Court justice, told Brazilian reporters on Wednesday.
His words carry weight: Justice Antonio Dias Toffoli is a former lawyer for the governing Workers Party who was appointed to the court by Ms. Rousseff’s predecessor and political patron, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva……..”
quote from the state-operated New York Times
A good example of Brazil’s governance problems is seen in the recent dam collapse:
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/01/brazil-samarco-rio-doce-disaster-vale-pt-neoliberalism-rousseff-dilma-lula/
The collapse appears to have involved major mismanagement, the dam having failed due to an effort to ramp up production of iron ore, without sufficient safety infrastructure. The increased production was intended to compensate for the profit loss (and tax revenue loss) due to falling ore prices.
There was no pressure on the company (a BHB Billiton – Vale joint venture) from the government to operate safely:
“The costs of cleanup and long-term economic and environmental damage are never fully borne by the company – often itself a subsidiary used by larger corporations to evade liability – but instead are passed on to local and national governments. In Brazil this is exacerbated as the costs of adopting safety measures or even operating legally often far outweigh the token fines imposed on companies which violate the law. Fees imposed on Samarco are so far some of the largest but still fall far short of the overwhelming economic, environmental, and human cost of this man-made disaster.”
If Dilma Rousseff had not decided to cooperate so closely with the extractive industries (including Petrobras) she might have retained far more public support and the whole impeachment scam could have failed:
“While Vale may have been privatized under the neoliberal leadership of Cardoso and the right-wing PSDB the new owners of the company quickly found willing partners in the Workers Party of former President Lula da Silva and current President Dilma Rousseff. Legal efforts to challenge the privatization over irregularities in the sale received no support from the PT, who instead embraced Vale, the mining industry, and the banks that own and finance much of industry.”
Damn shame about Prince. He was a brilliant dude.
I bet you won’t post my previous comments. Typical of those self-righteous, tunnel visioned jacks who don’t give a damn about anyone other than yourself. If you want to become a big name in the news, start by writing the truth because a journalist REPORTS both sides of the story. You are clearly not anyone who can be classified as a true journalist.
Something struck me as strange. The VP and 3rd highest representatives directly behind Rouseff are corrupt? Isn’t that partially her responsibility?
Greenwald, you should move to Cuba or Venezuela because it is obvious that you do not give a damn about rampant corruption never seen before in Brazil and what it has done to more than 10 millions of Brazilians who lost their jobs with NO prospects. The whole country has gone to hell and our hope for the future a.k.a. PETROBRAS has been robbed down to the ground, thanks to the corrupts and anarchists a.k.a. PT under the watch of Dilma whose impeachment is WANTED BY AT LEAST 2/3 OF THE POPULATION. It is quite obvious that you are a communist POS, so why don’t you move to Cuba or Venezuela and GET OUT of our country because OUR YELLOW/GREEN FLAG WILL NEVER BE RED. Get the hell out of our country.
Very very problem for Brazil.
My people honest.
Honor.
Never be govern for Michel TEMER.
It is amazing that finally some press is doing its job and bringing to the light this impeachment stakeholders.
I just feel bad that soon the intercept, the Guardian and other News websites will be invaded by “robots” writing at the coments
against PT and stuff like that…
I don’t understand, if Dilma is a leftist (and I have a great deal of respect for leftists – in many ways they are much better at fooling the people than rightists), why she didn’t create a sycophantic state media company. The BBC in Britain is an excellent example of how to use state media to subtly propagandize the general public. It seems like an elementary error to allow the media to be used as a weapon by your political opponents. The first rule of any government should be: control the media.
Second, a lot of people are disappointed that Ms Rousseff apparently just watched as other others enriched themselves. If you are the head of a corrupt system, you must lead by example. If the plutocrats whose job is to plunder the country are equally corrupt, then no one individual can be attacked without endangering the entire system. But when some hold back from corruption, their solidarity is compromised. The entire political system can turn inwards, attacking itself as in Brazil, and creating instability. Fudging the accounts to hide the extent of the deficit doesn’t rise to the level of real corruption, in my books. So Dilma has failed.
Third, I wonder why Brazil isn’t following proper South American protocol, with the military stepping in to bail out the system. It seems the CIA may no longer be giving the generals good advice. This is unfortunate, as a Junta is often the most effective government at rolling back any human rights legislation and other mistakes made by civilian governments. I realize that it is trendy in many countries, to turn over the government to Goldman Sachs. But I really think they are over-rated. They simply follow the same old recipe of imposing austerity, without any imagination or innovation. So there’s really no value added and they are just living off their brand name at this point.
So there are a lot of questions which aren’t addressed in the present article. To summarize:
1. Why does Brazil not have a state media?
2. Why isn’t Dilma more corrupt?
3. Why hasn’t there been a military coup?
Yeah, where are the generals when when we need them? Have they been overtaken, not only by events, but by Goldman Sachs? I miss those great uniforms.
“Yeah, where are the generals when when we need them? ”
The only General available to save our “Democracy” WAS Gen.Stedile. But…but..but.. according to the grapevine, he is beating a hasty retreat, as his front line soldiers lost their will to fight.
Awesome comment, enjoyed your thoughts process!
my two cents:
1. Why does Brazil not have a state media?
When the worker’s party government first took place with Lula in 2001 there was the idea the it would not be able to implement non conservative policies being totally against the oligarchies. So the millions paid on propaganda to Globo and other outlets like Folha and even Veja were not halted. This is also pointed out by leftists as one of the main mistakes of the government, although I don’t think that creating a strong state media is the right way to go, it might be one that works but it shouldn’t be the one pursued by a center-leftist government. If that was the case that the government would turn its TV Brasil in a strong state media it would suffer a lot more accusations of using the state resources for a “projeto de poder”.
2. Why isn’t Dilma more corrupt?
She is not accused of corruption, if “knowing” equals “taking part” every single Brazilian should go to jail, she is the president, she is not the supreme court. That says a lot about institutions not working. You should ask yourself “What would happen if the president of Brazil started accusing oligarchs of corruption?”. When answering the question you should take into consideration that Brazil is under media groups that accused the president of being out of control, like Veja magazine did, releasing one of its weekly editions in which the cover was the edited picture of the president celebrating a score of the Brazilian team during the world cup like that was an extreme of anger.
3. Why hasn’t there been a military coup?
Some say that the armed forces are not willing to take part on it anymore, it’s also well known and history has it that a military government is a violent regime. The contest is very different form the past though, one of the military regime strongest weapons was the communication, where legend has it Globo played an important whole, but know it’s different there is the Internet (which by the way is under fire of the oligarchs that control it and want to restrict its access, but that’s a side story).
1. Why does Brazil not have a state media?
Public ownership of life support institutions is verboten.
2. Why isn’t Dilma more corrupt?
Private ownership of public officials earns more money.
3. Why hasn’t there been a military coup?
Thieves are finding less troublesome to occupy existing offices rather than buck it all. Chameleonism is way easier and more acceptable.
goldman sachs just wants to own the country, nothing more.
Glenn,
Brazil has become an easy prey for the Capital. Wall Street will wander through our landscapes. Brazil will become a paradise for the plutocracy.
Goodbye social programs and wealth distribution, farewell sovereignty.
Best Regards,
Djalma
Pour analyses. Just one point of view, facts omitted. That’s not the only reason for the impeachment. What about pasadena? So what’s happening in Brazil? You should know better!
I don’t have any idea where this reporter are looking. But isn’t to Brasil. Dilma Roussef is destroying brasilian economy, and works only to maintain yourself. Don’t exist governance here anymore, since last year. So she will take out, by impeachment, and this is a democracy tool. Game over to Dilma.
do not forget the Pasadena fraud involving Rousseff thief ..
As you said it the first paragraph “IT’S NOT EASY for outsiders to sort through all the competing claims about Brazil’s political crisis”
This is just the first step. It’s impossible to catch everyone at the same time…
So try to study a bit more about Brazil to understand…
I don’t know how many independent (for now) states there are out there. But I would advise, and shouldn’t have to, that their leaders take a lesson from this. Democracy is fine, but you can’t let private media run amok. If the Right can call the destruction of democracy ‘security’, I think that wise leaders who want to show solidarity with their people instead of powerful special interests within and without can put measures in place to prevent the media from helping to destroy the government through lies. And, not least, never, never have no media competition. Not every citizen is a journalist or possesses a journalists ability to dig out facts and to challenge narratives put forth by the powerful. But if they are nudged, by views (in a government media outlet) with alternative views, then those who care to know will steps to know, to do enough digging to know, not everything, but what they need to know. Democracy, then, might stand a chance.
democracy has no chance to succeed on planet earth as long as..
1 monetary resources are allowed to be horded
2 private money is allowed in elections
3 media is allowed to lie
4 poverty is legal
5 elected and appointed officials are allowed to lie or act to injure the democracy
6 life support industries are not owned by the public
7 comfort lifestyle is not allowed to be earned and inherited
8 people have to work more than 20 years
9 police have the power to oppose demonstrators
10 jails are privately owned
Let the private media lie. But make them pay a penalty, once their lies have been clearly demonstrated. Clearly tie the penalities to the lies. And categorize the lies. If the media can be shown to be aiding and abetting the overthrow of the government, the penalties should be severe. Such media should be crippled. Whatever it takes.
I hear that they’re twinning Brazil with Ukraine.
“Has been an inspiring example of how a young democracy can mature and thrive”. Would you please elaborate that a bit further? It seems like you’re not considering how the mismanagement of the actual administration have suppressed democracy in Brazil. By the way, Temer has always been a part of Dilma’s bid. All the 54 millions of Dilma’s voters also voted for him. So who’s to blame? There’s no quick fix for the political and economic crisis that have lead among other things to a division never seen before in the Brazilian population.
You basically echoed the 7th grade garbage from your Brazilian partner. Any political plot of this dimension would require something much deeper than a good x evil conspiracy of media and oligarchs against the ‘progressive’.
Talking about serving the oligarchs, the most implicated of them all is Lula da Silva. You know nothing about Brazil. What a little corrupt man you are. Is it for money or for ideology you are doing this?
The opposition can only claim to be legitimate if they win an election – this is called democracy, and would empower them as a democratically elected government. Without doing that they are illegitimate and they need to stop trying to gain power through illegitimate and un democratic means. Respect democracy and respect the peoples choice of who they want to govern or f…ck off.
Yeah, and what about impeachable crimes?
in 1775 the colonists politely asked the british red-coats to leave. The redcoats refused. The colonists protested and the redcoats fired on them. The colonists then fired back and killed enough of them to cause them to surrender.
Then the colonists formed a democracy. Then the redcoat privateers made moves to take it back. Then the people asked the redcoat privateers to leave. And the redcoat privateers refused to leave. And then the people were denied their democracy because the redcoats bought the candidates and told the people that a democracy is nothing more than the right to vote for the candidate of “their” choice.
And the people did not have the power to once again fire on the redcoats in defence of their democracy because they had not provided for that eventuality. And the people lost their democracy.
It’s amazing to see how this article written exactly what the current government uses as their defense, how it repeats the same things that PT and their paid groups are saying for nearly a year now. Amazing how people that are against the impeachment try desperately to turn things around, going as far as saying that is “Temer, Cunha and their people” that are polarizing the people’s opinion, when Lula started doing that since he became president in 2003, being this polarization was basically all his president runs words to say “the poor against the rich”.
Dilma is not only also involved in corruption as Eduardo Cunha, but she is directly involved in the biggest corruption schme of all time, reaching billions of dollars taken from public companies and the government in her and her party’s favor. Making their allies companies grow 10 times in 10 years or less, as well as the former president sons, that were nothing, becoming some of the biggest business men in the country.
Any person that is not involved with the government or being paid by it knows how the current government destroyed the country’s finances. You public debt is almost the same size of our GDP, which miracle will happen to get that in control again? One of the biggest oil company of the world has been taken to nearly bankruptcy to win an election, now Brazilians pay extremely expensive values for gas and all transport. The inflation is at two digits, huge amounts of companies are not able to maintain themselves in business.
Our economy is completely ruined, and simply NO REAL MEASURES were or are being taken to recover. The only thing they support is, obviously, send the account to the people, that is already barely paying their needs, with MORE taxes, despite the fact that we are already one of the countries the pays most taxes in the world.
The only way to get better is sending to jail the ones responsible for this destruction of the state, Lula, Dilma and their partners. In one way, because they never wanted to make this a better country. In other way, as a warning for everyone that is taking advantage of their current positions, that if they try to harm the country, they will get busted as well. Cunha is already at judgement on the Supreme Court, and hopefully will be arrested in near future, as shall be arrested both the president and former president. From this point, we can think of getting a better economy. Before that, it is impossible.
Maybe one day we will find Mr Greenwald’s name on some list.
Michel Temmer is indeed a leader in this outrageous coup attempt which threatens democracy in Brazil. it is disgusting that the powerful elite, and their global corporations believe that they have the right to overthrow democratically elected governments just to further their own greedy and selfish agendas.
It seems nowadays,that in almost every country that has a democratically elected socialist leadership -tactics are being deployed to install new governments and leaderships that will favour the elite. They want corporatised far right governments, and are instrumental in causing problems by sponsoring and sometimes arming extremist political opponents and far right wing activists. On other occasions they use back door methods by promoting a transformation to a digitally disruptive economy, which favours only the elite and their well established US e-businesses and technology companies. On other occasions, the elite just use trade agreements to circumvent a countries sovereign laws. They will stop at nothing to overthrow any democratically elected leader or government that they cannot buy to further their greed.
The global corporations? Every business is firing people here. From small to big. Did you take your pills today?
It is illegal for corporatists to usurp the power of democracy. That is the law. When tried in the public’s owned court and found guilty of this crime, these persons will be removed from the country.
Declare the law
We are not polarized. 80% of the population wants Dilma Roussef out. It will be hard to recover the country ecomony with the political elite we have but it will be impossible to recover the country if she and her party PTstay in duty.
it is a lie this article.
82 por cent of the population want to get rid of Dilma, communist.
she. committed a crime, and the constitution gives the right for the impeachment.
I am not intimate with what is happening is Brazil, but it reads like it’s right out of N. Kline’s Shock Doctrine.
I came across this reading recently and thought it applicable:
“It is difficult enough to understand that a nation which has just begun to liberate itself, to tear down all the barriers between different sections of the people and to establish a political community, should solemnly proclaim the right of the egoistic man, separated from his fellow men and from the community, and should renew this proclamation at a moment when only the most heroic devotion can save the nation (and is, therefore, urgently called for), and when the sacrifice of all the interest of civil society is in question and egoism should be punished as a crime. The matter becomes still more incomprehensible when we observe that the political liberators reduce citizenship, the political community, to a mere means for preserving these so-called rights of man; and consequently, that the citizen is declared to be the servant of egoistic “man,” that the sphere in which man functions as a species-being is degraded to a level below the sphere where he functions as partial being, and finally that it is man as a bourgeois and not man as a citizen who is considered the true and authentic man.” – Karl Marx
it is a matter of ..
OWNERSHIP. Who owns the economic system?
SUBJUGATION. Do we work for the system, or does the system work for us?
LIFE. Are the lives of humans primary and sacred? Is life support an entitlement?
BALANCE. Shall poverty be allowed? Shall wealth be allowed in the face of poverty?
This sounds a lot like what happened in Thailand.
Correct. It is happening everywhere there is a socialist government in place that the elite cannot buy or control. This will also happen in Vietnam, Libya, Cambodia, Cuba, and Laos, and in many other countries where the elite want to gain control of strong and emerging economies. It’s all about winning control of new territories for economic development. They have no respect for democracy, and their greed and corruption has limits. They have already corporatised and militarised numerous Western governments and they now use their power to control foreign policies and intelligence agencies to disrupt, and to justify interventions in other countries.
Typo ” no limits”
lol
have all of these countries also conveniently had massive economic problems and insanely high amounts of corruption?
just curious
by the way, this guy is the elected vice president, you know? it’s not like he is some random off the street… sure, his actions in office may have turned people against him, but that can apply to any elected official as well.
Lol.
Almost every country in the World has corruption, and economic problems. It is ridiculous to suggest that this would be a justification for removing a democratically elected political leader or government. If this was a valid excuse then many Western countries that are currently in deep recession, with corrupt governments should all be impeached and replaced with new leadership without a new election.
The USA, UK and most of Europe are extremely corrupt – they are just better at hiding it.
The citizens of the u.s. would be rightfully warned that the youth are being prodded prepped and lured into admiring conflict, weapons, and military. Obviously the Owner’s Club of wealthy pig thieves who despise real democracy and ordinary life, are looking for some armed support to help them rob other countries.
Mr. Greenwald
“……Reporters Without Borders just yesterday released its 2016 Press Freedom Rankings, and ranked Brazil 103 in the world because of violence against journalists but also because of this key fact: “Media ownership continues to be very concentrated, especially in the hands of big industrial families that are often close to the political class.” Is it not crystal clear what’s going on here?…..”
You are joking aren’t you? Since when do you care about a Reporters Without Borders report? In 2014, You wrote an article praising a reporter for Russian TV who criticized the Russian invasion of Crimea. You wrote:
“……..American media elites awash in an orgy of feel-good condemnation in particular love to mock Russian media, especially the government-funded English-language outlet RT, as being a source of shameless pro-Putin propaganda, where free expression is strictly barred (in contrast to the Free American Media). That that network has a strong pro-Russian bias is unquestionably true. But one of its leading hosts, Abby Martin, remarkably demonstrated last night what “journalistic independence” means by ending her Breaking the Set program with a clear and unapologetic denunciation of the Russian action in Ukraine……..”
By the way, the same Reporters Without Borders rated the media freedom in Russia at 148th in 2014. Russia is one of the most dangerous places on earth for journalists to criticize the government. You praise the media freedom when the ranking of the country is 148th, and criticize the media freedom when the ranking is 103rd. So the media ranking by Reporters Without Borders is really irrelevant to you. What really matters is making political hay from the report when it helps your argument as in the case of Brazil, but ignoring the report when it calls into question your political point as in Russian TV (and at the same time throwing all of the murdered and beaten – real – Russian journalists under the bus).
It seems hypocritical to criticize the Brazil media for doing exactly what you advocate – and clearly do yourself. They have a political agenda. What a shock.
This is a huge lie. We have dozens of TV channels, ten major newspapers. Brazilian media is not concentrated at all. And this market imploded with the internet, as it happened in the rest of the world.
This was always the familiar and repetitive craving of the authoritarian left to control a massive propaganda machine – which actually the Workers Party build with corruption money and buying off the existing players with government advertising budgets.
Thank you for bringing some goddamn sense to this discussio .
The post lightly [edited] for accuracy:
“Mr. Greenwald
You [know I’m a troll, don’t] you? Since when do [I] care about [the truth]? In 2014, You wrote an article praising a reporter for Russian TV who criticized the Russian invasion of Crimea.
It'[s dishonest] to criticize [you] for doing exactly what [you didn’t do: “praise the media freedom” in Russia] – and clearly [you didn’t; you praised the reporter. But I am a liar]. What a shock.”
Hi Doc
First of all, investigative reporting by Abby Martin mostly served as a propaganda tool for RT (Wikipedia):
“……According to Rolling Stone magazine, past shows investigated “Monsanto, Nestle, the U.S. federal electoral system, the drone program, the NSA, Israel, Obama, and water fluoridation”……”
Abby’s investigative reporting and criticism of US policies fit well with RT executives – an anti-American site.
Secondly, state-funded RT jumped on this particular opportunity to promote some more propaganda implying there is journalistic independence in a country ranked 148th by Reporters Without Borders (a fact left out of the Greenwald article for political expedience although he was quick to point out that Brazil ranked 103rd):
“……..“Contrary to the popular opinion, RT doesn’t beat its journalists into submission, and they are free to express their own opinions, not just in private but on the air.” The statement then added: “In her comment Ms. Martin also noted that she does not possess a deep knowledge of reality of the situation in Crimea. As such we’ll be sending her to Crimea to give her an opportunity to make up her own mind from the epicenter of the story.”……”
Greenwald’s praise of Abby Martin served as a propaganda coup for RT, and at the same time, he threw all the murdered, beaten and intimidated Russian journalists under the bus (which is why Russia is ranked 148th). Of course, Ms. Martin turned down a visit to Crimea on behalf of RT. A study conducted by students at Columbia University School of Journalism throughout 2015 came up with these conclusions about RT (Wikipedia):
“…….For much of 2015, graduate students at Columbia School of Journalism took part in the RT Watch project, monitoring RT’s (US) output. Casey Michel, who worked on the project, wrote “RT ignores the inherent traits of journalism—checking sources, relaying facts, attempting honest reportage” and “you’ll find ‘experts’ lacking in expertise, conspiracy theories without backing, and, from time to time, outright fabrication for the sake of pushing a pro-Kremlin line”.[163][164] The results were compiled in a Tumblr blog……”
None of that is surprising. What is even less surprising is how Greenwald used Abby Martin to make a point about journalism while she reported on a Russian propaganda site. In doing so, Greenwald ignored the record of RT and the Russian media in general: Russia is one of the most dangerous places to work as a journalist in the world.
Greenwald treats any topic like he is a lawyer before the Supreme Court. He only provides arguments to advance his narrative. This is exactly what the journalists in Brazil do. They practice what he preaches only suddenly Greenwald wants more objective reporting (thus his criticism of Brazil’s media). That’s hypocritical to say the least.
“None of that is surprising. What is even less surprising is…”
How can something be less surprising than something that’s not surprising?
I’m not expecting an answer, but go ahead. Surprise me.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. So one host on a RT criticized the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Mr Greenwald pointed this out. So what’s the point?
CraigSummers is a broken digital clock; wrong any time you look.
As well as the usual media oligarchy dominating with “messages for the people to consume”, add on the media-supported information grey-out that will be the net effect of the new ‘franquia’ limits on internet use, and yet again control will be acheived by limiting education and communication. :(
I’m sure THIS TIME austerity will work out just fine and save the economy – despite being an abysmal disaster every time it’s implemented.
An interesting article written by Glenn Greenwald . I did read the op-ed written by David Miranda in the Guardian as well as the interview conducted by Simon Romero of NYtimes. Quite enlightening.
But none of them mentions as WHO ELSE gets benefited politically and juridically if the Vice President replaces the current President and declares amnesty to ALL for the sake of “National Reunification” and “National Pacification” (the favorite buzz words used by our politicos)? The answer is dozens of members of the Workers Party who are currently in jail or under investigation over “Lava Jato” !
It is difficult to fight corruption in our country. If anybody wants to “acabar com corrupção” , the corruption is very likely to “acabar com” ele/ela.
Anyway if Ms.Rousseff gets ousted by the Senate, I do not think she will continue to be in the national political scene to be “kicked around”! Nor the common Joe is going to see his life improving overnight!!!
It is extremely depressing to see the dark pro-yankee neoliberal forces coalesce around the corrupt element while accusing the resistance forces of corruption. I know it is of great concern to Mr. Greenwald, who has been resident in Brazil in recent years. I am sure with his knowledge of the situation and his close friendship with Mr. Miranda, who seems in the know, that these commentaries tell us the reality of the situation.
It is impossible for anyone to have an objective discussion on this subject. Brazil is even more polarized than the US. Temer, Cunha and their gang basically say, a la Bush: “You are with them or with us”. There is no middle ground.
Any article, editorial, piece, etc that is against the impeachment is immediately understood as something supporting Dilma and the PT. And vice versa, any criticism of Dilma and the PT is immediately labeled as a coup. The local midia, as previously denounced by Mr. Greenwald, are agents of the opposition, supporting the coup-impeachment.
I myself, have been convinced that the PT, including Lula and Dilma have taken the country to a level of endemic corruption never seen before. Either directly or indirectly. It is impossible to accept that the proven cases of corruption within Petrobras would not have Lula and Dilma’s blessings.
Still, I am against the current impeachment proceeding because the “civil-responsibility crime” has not been characterized. And that has to happen before an impeachment proceeding can move forward.
An impeachment process can not be used by opportunistic politicians, as in the current case. Poor management of the country’s finances is not justification to expel an elected president. for that, we have elections. Failure to follow the democratic path could lead to very dangerous outcomes.
The opposition either win the elections or go home. Misusing the constitution and the tool of impeachment to reach the Palacio do Planalto will backfire and the popular backlash will be horrendous.
Excellent comment, which well captures the nuances and complexities, as well as the extreme difficulty of conveying them in such a polarized debate (which wars for power, which is what this is, often end up being).
….. ” even more polarized than the US.”
When something is “polarized” it generally implies that
there are two somewhat equal forces working against each other
within a variable balance. I do not know about Brazil,
but the assessment that the fake U$A is “polarized”
is bogus.
The vast majority of democrats and republicans who form
the vast majority of voters are actually supporting the
same agenda of arrogant “exceptional” economic domination
of the planet through military force and indifference to
the suffering and the environmental degradation they cause
in the name of “the american way of life.”
There is a very small opposition ( possibly 5% of the voters)
to the immense democrat/republican corruption, but the
fake U$A is hardly polarized in any real way.
The portrayal of democrats and republicans as polarized
is a favorite lie which the corporate predators and their media
use to keep the vast majority brainwashed and desperately
masochistic.
The democrats and republicans are two right wings on a
self-abusive and insatiable economic beast.
All of their flapping maintains a death spiral and they
are grasping to take as many others down with them as possible.
They have their economic claws into Brazil.
The good ol USA is quite polarized at the moment.
US vs the 1%.
Can Brazilians own firearms?
The predators attacking south american countries want to own the economies there. One of them backed Marco Rubio. The goldsachs monsters want more imo. I am looking for clues that they are wanting to reduce the population like israel is attempting with Palestine. They begin with an eviction procedure like was done with NAKBA.
How does the opposition is able to control the local media? Using Petrobras or government advertising budget? Oh no, that was the Workers Party…
Dilma defrauded our budgetary laws and she was repeatedly warned of the consequences. It is an impeachable crime. They did not care, since they had ‘Petrolão’ buying off the majority of Congress. It is close to impossible to charge a president with Impeachment – 2/3 of the votes. They were so confident they could do anything and nothing would happen. But then their power base eroded, and they rushed to cover the budget hole.
That caused an artificial credit crunch, with discretionary spending and state bank financing lines being frozen for a couple of weeks. That in the middle of an already serious stagnation.
If you remember, Globo has already acknowledged and “repented” from supporting the 1964 coup and ensuing dictatorship. If you remember, Globo used disgraceful means to make Collor win against Lula. If you don’t acknowledge that the part of the midia comprised of Globo, Veja, Epoca, etc are actively engaged in supporting this power grabbing move, you disqualify yourself from this debate.
I, let me repeat, abhor what PT, Lula and Dilma have done with Brazil and also believe that they belong in jail. However, the democratic institutions are being threatened and we can not allow such games in Brazil, at the risk of believing that an impeachment is a reasonable solution for an unpopular government in the middle of an economic and political crisis. If we allow for that to happen, Brazil will be plagued with cycle after cycle of impeachment proceedings and that is NOT a healthy democracy.
Exactly. This Greenwald should move to Cuba or Venezuela because it is obvious he does not give a damn about rampant corruption never seen before in Brazil, thanks to the anarchists a.k.a. PT or “PTralhas” as the overwhelming percentage of Brazilians refer to Dilma & Lula’s party. GET OUT OF OUR COUNTRY & GO TO HELL TOGETHER WITH THE PTRALHAS.
Sorry, R.M., but you and I are in opposite ends of the spectrum here. We should feel honored that a journalist of the caliber of Mr. Greenwald decides to post opinion pieces about the current chaotic situation in Brazil.
Unfortunately, as I said in a previous comment, you are one of the people who is so hellbent in seeing PT out that any opinion against the coup is misinterpreted as supporting PT, Lula and Dilma.
Remember, many times, the enemy of my enemy is just another enemy.
I wonder where the U.S. hand is in this? What “democracy” sponsoring organizations are helping here?
I admit I may be well off base, but there often seems to be some “help” from our friends who so value democracy.
Well, getting rid of Rousseff will not be viewed unkindly by the US elites and government: Surely it will ge helpful to them to fight off the competition of the new banking arrangement the BRICS have been working to establish.
Please help us to save our country!
God helps those who help themselves?We are trying Lord!
Asking Americans for help is a form of self hatred.
I have been deeply disturbed for some time now, years actually. Maybe I should stop reading the news.
Brazil is Surreal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKPFC8DA9_8
It might be instructive to look at how exchange traded funds like EWZ have performed over the last couple months as the impeachment efforts have gained steam.
I’d expected to see a chart showing a stock market implosion since the beginning of the year; after all, this is a major political crisis. Instead they’re up something like 35% since the end of January
Stock markets are fickle and it’s easy to read too much into them (particularly when they’ve declined as much as Brazil has over the last five years). But it seems like a fair assumption that investors are betting on Brazil getting a neoliberal into power that can ram through capital-friendly reforms.
Bad math on my part – it’s up almost 60% in 3 months.
This kind of thing would never happen in the United States!
(Ok, not this century, at least not until Hillary gets elected, and only if she doesn’t bring a Congressional majority along on her coattails.)
“oligarchs and their media…are trying to install as president: the corruption-tainted, deeply unpopular, oligarch-serving…” sounds familiar. maybe wasserman-schultz can retire down there. find some lucrative employment. be somewhere less annoying than florida yet still surrounded by castro haters.
i doubt this will be mentioned by our media during the election but, as with honduras, i expect the future to bring the full and guiltless support of president clinton. she’s never met an anti-democratic plutocrat coup she didn’t like. president trump? not sure what that entertaining alternate future contains.
they were ranked 104, by the way. not a huge difference but still amusing.
Unconditional support to our friends in DC is pretty much guaranteed under the new government. History repeats itself.
Yes,our MSM has the hots for the hell bitch.
Can females be the anti-Christ?
What a misleading oversimplifcation. GG makes it sound as if this is nothing than the media and the plutocrats are the only ones calling the shots and hand-picking Temer to be president.
That is far, far from the truth and it is simly an echo of the coup narrative put forward by PT.
Fact: the ONLY reason for Temer becoming the president in case for impeachment is the fact that he was elected vice-president inthe last election with Dilma. This is not the media’s doing, it was Dilma’s campaign’s doing. The media establishment campaigned hard and dirty against Dilma and Temer’s election and PT supporters fought for him.
Fact: this is not just a tiny elite calling the shots. Far from it. GG and his partner and paintin a charicature of Brazil and its people. Yes, the media is waging a relentless campaign against Dilma and PT. But they’ve done this for a long time. They did it during the last election and that did not prevent Dilma winning it. The people are not such dupes as GG wants us to believe.
You cannot accurately explain what is happening in Brazil with this partisan narrative that is all just a conspiracy by a tiny elite! It is factor, sure, but there is a confluence of many complex factors and GG is ommiting everything else and painting a misleading, oversimplified version of the events.
Dilma’s government self-destructed and that is why the main new fact that explains her predicament. The plutocrats and the opposition have always been there. But what happened since the last election is that she betrayed her base by making a radical u-turn on her campaign platform, after a very dirty election where she mercilessly destroyed her opposition like Marina, with a fear monger campaign tha Marina would do the things that Dilma did immediately after winning: shifting right, naming a banker to the Finance Ministry and treasury, getting the farm lobby into cabinet positions etc.
Then, her coalition imploded, key allies, all corrupt as hell, enabled by PT for over a decade, switched sides and she lost all support. This was not the plutocrats’ doing.
This is a partisan discourse and very very biased.
Why doesn’t GG explain how this potential appointments by Temer differ from Dilma’s own appointments? Fromthis article, you would think we would go from a left-wing finance minister to a Goldman Sachs stooge, but the reality is that it is the same kind of people that Dilma named. Joaquim Levy! Tombini! Henrique Meirelles. All Chicago school types.
…which is precisely the opposite of what the population has voted for. So not only they’re removing a democratically elected president, but also going against the popular vote by implementing the neolioberal policies they voted against. It doesn’t get any worse than this.
so basically you’re saying that the vice president, who appoints the same type of ministers as the president, is a travesty against democracy or something?
i guess the president herself could also be ‘neoliberal’ which is what they didn’t want and that seems to be what you’re asserting. but if that’s the case, why do you care either way?
Exactly.
That’s quite the pretzel logic my friend. Here’s a summary for you:
– The ONLY reason Temer might become president is murky at best – especially considering that Michel Temer himself, both her predecessors, and numerous brazilian governors relied – and still rely – on the same so-called accounting trick for which she is going down. How strange.
– It is precisely the elite who is calling the shots – or do you think low income brazilians have any say on what is aired by Globo, or published by the godawful brazilian “free press” (GUFFAW!)?
– Betraying the base – while an awful thing to do (and she did) – is not grounds for impeachment. Furthermore, what’s the logic behind impeaching Dilma and replacing her with a guy who has vowed to implement the opposition’s economic policy – ie doing the exact opposite of what he population has voted for – wtf?
– I think in reality the truth behind this travesty is finally coming out now that the story has gotten out of the hands of the brazilian press echo chamber.
Eduardo Cunha did presid over the impeachment proceedings, but his role is done. The House opens the proceedings but it is the Senate that actually decides. In the Senate, the process will be presided by Dilma’s ALLY. The impeachment will continue to be presided by a notoriously corrupt politician, but since he is Dilma’s ally he is not worth mentioning?! GG talks about Eduardo Cunha, who no longer has a role, but not Renan Calheiros, who is now in charge, both from the same party, both notoriously corrupt. Why is that?!
Renan Calheiros? The same individual who ran the Justice Department during Fernando Henrique’s presidency? Let’s stop playing dumb here.
Yes, that guy. Who has been a PT ally since then.
That’s not a “fact.” That’s the opposite of a “fact.”
The only reason Temer is being made president – a position to which he was never elected and *could never be* elected – is because the person who was elected to that position is being removed.
Moreover, a large majority – very close to the same percentage as exists for Dilma – want Temer *impeached.* So you can’t simultaneously (a) cite opinion polls showing people favor impeachment as proof that you’re upholding democracy while (b) installing Temer, who people also want impeached, and pretend you’re upholding democracy.
Moreover, it would be just as easy to impeach Temer as it is to impeach Dilma. And, the Supreme Court has ordered Congress to consider his impeachment. But Temer is protecting Cunha, and Cunha is protecting Temer, so that won’t happen. He’s not being impeached – despite his corruption – because Brazilian elites like his agenda and ideology – that’s the proof that corruption is the pretext.
Finally, the other alternative is new elections. That’s how this whole debacle could be avoided of having corrupt politicians ascend to power: let the people decide.
But that option is untenable to the elite because they’re petrified that Lula will win or – almost as bad – Marina. There are no other options. And they don’t want either.
In other words, what Brazilian elites fear most is having the people choose who the president will be – i.e., what they fear most is democracy.
Right. They couldn’t remove PT from power under Lula, and under Dilma’s first term, because they were too popular and people would never have allowed it.
They’re exploiting Dilma’s lack of popularity – due to the collapsing economy and her lack of charisma – to achieve what they always wanted to do but couldn’t achieve before: remove PT from office anti-democratically.
PT has been awful in lots of ways. They have a genuine corruption problem – as even Lula admitted to me. But you and your plutocrat and media friends haven’t been able to defeat them in an election despite trying 4 straight times, and you see this as your big chance.
What you’re counting on is that the poor, racial minorities and the working classes – which have been largely (not entirely, but largely) absent from this controversy (we’ve repeatedly cited the data on this) – will stay indifferent to your installing someone like Temer. We’ll see if that’s true. It’s a big, big gamble you’re taking with Brazilian democracy and stability, and I the outcomes are going to be far less pleasing than people like you have gotten yourselves to expect.
A lot of straw man arguments and ad hominem. Unbecoming of you. You don’t know where I stand politically. This kind of behavior may be appropriate for a litigator, but it is not appropriate for a journalist.
Gee I wonder where you stand politically. /eyeroll
Who started with ad hominem arguments was you my dear, at the accuse the journalist of being allied with the PT.
you can always tell a right wing con- they always make attempts to belittle people as if to poison their drink or throw acid on them. That’s the problem with right wingers – they haven’t the mental capacity to deal with facts and what constitutes good relationships. Typically, right wingers are so brain deficit that they have to resort to *control freak style* relationships – like stealing power or lying. The fact is, right wingers are just plain stupid. They prefer organized crime. They pretend to be religious. When they network, they operate more like a duck colony with the pecking order thing so they know their place. Between neanderthal and homo sapien, right wingers are the missing links.
Either he blockquotes on your post above are all screwed up; or you copied in quotes you didn’t want to use.
Yes, the media and the plutocrats are taking advantage of her weakness to do what they always wanted. But the point that I’m raising is that this is just one part of the story, it is not the entire story. That alone does not explain why the impeachment is succeeding. It is a very convenient and partisan story to tell: “look, this is nothing more than same old Latin American coup d’etat by the same old elite”. But the facts are lot more complex.
There many other factors that need to be taken to account to explain how we got here. So much is due to Dilma’s own actions, her government and her allies. And you are simply not telling that story, not telling the entire story. You give a very partial view of the events.
You put all the bad elements in the opposition camp, implying that Dilma is a victim of external forces. You omit that many of these forces are coming out of her camp, not the opposition’s camp. You omit that Dilma and PT helped this people get in power and enabled them to get where they are. They are not just creatures of the media and the plutocrats.
You omit that her last election is huge political fraud, that Dilma and Temer were together perpetrating that fraud. You talk about the dark interests and shoddy characters that Temer may bring to cabinet positions, implying that this is stark contrasts to Dilma’s own cabinet, when in fact they are actually quite aligned, that would be a continuation of what Dilma is already doing. The “undemocratic nature of what’s taking place” did not begin with the impeachment and it is not a product of the opposition’s actions, far from it. She, her party’s politics are to blame for this crisis of democracy as much as the “plutocrats”.
To criticize the impeachment and congress you don’t need to be so partial to Dilma, to be so biased toward the anti-impeachment camp. You don’t have to oversimplify, to omit the legitimate reasons why people are for impeachment, even if their reasoning is flawed. As you said, a lot of people want Temer out and want him impeached. Is that not a sign, also, that forces behind the impeachment are not all part of a conspiracy to put Temer in power? A lot of people believe that he and Cunha would be next after Dilma. Are they naïve, being duped? Perhaps. But arguably so are those like yourself and David that are being manipulated into defending Dilma’s interests in the name of “democracy” and perhaps progressive values, when in fact you are arguably being useful idiots for a political camp that has undermined democracy, has undermine progressive politics and has prime responsibility for this crisis and these despicable corrupt political actors.
I meant to say:
The “undemocratic nature of what’s taking place” did not begin with the impeachment and it is not ONLY a product of the opposition’s actions, far from it.
I missed the ONLY.
Diogo: I have lived in Brazil for 11 years and never uttered a word of support for PT, Lula or Dilma. I assure you that affection for PT and its leaders is not part of my worldview of what is motivating me. And I agree entirely that they are, in many respects – though far from all – the authors of their own fate.
I also agree that many people – ordinary citizens – are genuinely motivated by rage over corruption and believe that Temer, Cunha and the rest are next (though I think a large number of people marching in the street are just the same old anti-PT crowd that are exploiting the situation).
I am not writing in defense of PT. If I were, your critiques – and demand for greater complexity – would be valid.
I’m writing in defense of democracy, which I see as under attack, not necessarily by ordinary, angry Brazilians (who could never cause impeachment on their own), but by the most powerful Brazilian institutions, who are exploiting anger and re-directing it for their own ends.
I absolutely do not believe that once Dilma is impeached, that Temer and Cunha and the gang are going with them. If I thought that would happen, I’d see things somewhat differently (though I’d still be against Dilma’s impeachment, because I don’t think the actual accusations rise to the level to justify that: see Joaquim Barbosa’s comments on that.
Brazil’s elites don’t care about corruption – at all. They’re exploiting it to achieve the end they want. That’s the same reason I don’t think they’ll ever allow new elections. The last thing they want is for the voting population to decide who replaces Dilma. Do you really not see what a profound threat to democracy that is?
Thank you for responding!
I know you’re not petista. I’ve been following you for years and feel that I understand your politics. I admired your work precisely for the acumen and balanced views and analysis. Although I think this balance was lacking in this article and the last one Aloysio Nunes.
Different from your interview on CNN, or interview of Lula, these articles came across a bit partisan.
About you political view of the situation: I agree with almost everything you said here. I’m against the impeachment, although I’m more ambivalent about it. The accusation is legally fragile, Congress is illegitimate and corrupt and it could things worse in many respects. At the same time, I feel that Dilma has to go: she does have huge responsibility for the crisis and for the crimes with Petrobras. Also, she is simply unable to govern.
I recognize that there is a danger of a setback to democracy, and would be a win for the conservative forces. But I don’t think the right would take home the prize. It is very unclear what would happen afterwards, it certainly would not be the end of the drama. And, in any case, a Temer government would not have political capital to implement unpopular reforms.
I also think you may not be appreciating the pitfalls of this “right wing scare” tactics that is happening. This is something that PT has played many times before. They did in 2013 when the first anti-government mass protests broke out, even though that movement started in the left and saw mass participation by the general population! They did it again during the last election, against Marina, in a very cynical, manipulative campaign. They are doing the same game now: scare tactics, against people that were close politically and ideologically to them, who have virtually no relevant policy difference with PT governments.
And this tactic is deployed in defense of the political status quo.
A status quo that is unsustainable, paralyzing to the country and that is doing terrible harm to the left, which was reduced to “massa de manobra” for a government that is unworthy. It is empowering the right, who is now welcoming all the discontents that the left abandoned to defend PT.
That is why I think it is worth it to thread carefully to not play no one’s game in this impeachment battle.
Why not have an election then, and let the people decide ?
it didnt make sense to me that such corruption would be so widespread and near flaunted unless it was support by something other than popularity.
this whole thing appears to have a lot to do with israel.
Glenn, as you know, the opposite of a fact is a theory. What Diogo mentioned as fact is not a theory. It is indeed a fact, even though you may not like it because it doesn’t fit your THEORY about what is happening in Brazil.
Please let me elaborate.
Temer was elected vice-president as part of Dilma’s ticket. I will assume you agree that this much is a fact. If not, maybe some research in your part is required.
Just like in the US, if the president for some reason cannot perform his duty, the vice-president will take his/her place.
And how come there is no mention of the Supreme Court at all in this article? If the judges did what they are supposed to, Cunha would be in jail by now, and Temer half way there along with Dilma. What kind of journalism is this? What has happened to you?
Perhaps you should take a step or two back, and evaluate if your personal feelings about this matter are not clouding your journalistic judgment, which I used to admire.
well sqid Diogo. Dilma committed a crime against the nations. And destroyed the 8 th economy in the world. 20 millions unemployed!!!!
“the media is waging a relentless campaign against Dilma and PT”
Why not against Temer, Cunha?
I have yet to understand why Dilma would be impeached, but this article does confuse me. If Temer has so little support, how did he end up as vice-president? Where did all these votes for impeachment come from?
To be sure, the Goldman Sachs thing is awful. But fuck, here in the U.S. we are likely to have Ms. Talk-to-Goldman-Sachs-for-a-Living running against Mr. I-Married-a-Goldman-Sachs-Tool-and-Ain’t-I-Holy-for-It. So we have our own battles to fight here.
The usual US Economical Hitman. Same as almost everywhere else in S. America since way back.
Perhaps the Palestine Embassy in Brazil will be removed? Or the Israelian security company for the OL2016 will be reinstalled, after being kicked out?
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/charlotte-silver/brazil-cancels-2-billion-contract-israeli-security-firm-2016-olympics
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35910853 Israel backs down in Brazil Diplomat Stand-off
https://bdsmovement.net/2015/palestinian-and-brazilian-civil-society-launch-olympics-without-apartheid-campaign-13256
https://bdsmovement.net/2015/israeli-company-loses-2016-rio-olympics-security-contract-it-had-claimed-to-have-been-awarded-13120
http://lab.org.uk/brazil-steps-between-israel-and-iran
http://sputniknews.com/latam/20160113/1033053994/brazil-israel-ambassador.html Why New Israeli Ambassador Is Not Welcome In Brazil [Brazil was apparently angered by Israel’s choice of a settler leader and for announcing his appointment without any prior notification to its Foreign Ministry.]
http://www.timesofisrael.com/200-leftist-brazilian-academics-join-anti-israel-boycott/ [Earlier this month, a group of 40 retired Brazilian diplomats signed a petition against the appointment of former settler leader Dani Dayan as Israel’s ambassador to Brasilia, complaining that the Jewish state had bypassed protocol because there was no prior communication with the Brazilian Foreign Ministry or any presentation of his credentials for an agreement. In opposition, a pro-Dayan petition gathered nearly 4,000 signatures.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, right, meets with Dani Dayan, January 9, 2013 (photo credit: Gideon Markowicz/Flash90)
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, right, meets with Dani Dayan, the former head of the Yesha settler’s council, on January 9, 2013 (photo credit: Gideon Markowicz/Flash90)
After a six-month diplomatic imbroglio, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said if Brazil does not approve Dayan as ambassador, Israel will not offer another diplomat, and there will be a “de facto downgrade in relations” between the two countries.]
https://www.stopthewall.org/sites/default/files/brazilian_military_ties_with_israel.pdf
http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/58573/evangelical-brazilian-senator-rejecting-israeli-ambassador-akin-supporting-bds-biblical-zionism/#C5D9GJ4Y07KtWsfB.97 ….(This man has 5.2 million followers in Brazil.)
https://theintercept.com/2016/01/08/jean-wyllys-israel-pinkwashing/
For me…these articles and the familiar fruit says it all…
I pray for you and your partner’s protection Mr. G…because you are advocating for democratic elections which should be done in this scenerio…by the people of Brazil. Unfortunately there are too many people that follow blindly a false prophet (ie Senator Marcello Crivella) and those that have the money/power. With so much corruption/power…there can only be a revolution by the people. This same exact power is not only going on in Brazil, but all of Latin America, N. America, etc.
aha. goldsuckers in this is about israel.
it’s about israel.
it’s about israel.
israeli security company?
ahhhhhhhhhhhhh….. the fly in the ointment.
In a better world, every Latin American country would have a Glenn Greenwald living in it. I really can’t think of any other reason why the local corporate media narrative has not filtered out of the country unscathed this time around. There seems to be a refreshing contrast between the internal and external narratives.
That’s what I don’t get:
Why does it appear a majority of the country supports this, or isn’t taking to the streets to prevent it?
Are they being duped by press?
I simply don’t understand how the Brazilian people could support removing one purportedly “corrupt” individual, Dilma, but sit idle while she is being replaced by one of two who are demonstrably “more corrupt”.
Confusing as shit. I mean it’s tantamount to replacing Nixon with George Ryan and James Traficant. Makes no sense.
Its not supported by a majority. This is how our media covers it.
Sunday, during the voting, demonstrations against the impeachment were bigger than in favor. Yesterday we had a huge demonstration in São Paulo wich, different from others, was not organized by any big social movement.
The majority of the country DOES support the impeachment. Anti government prostests are happening since june 2013.
But the problem is that there’s no such thing as impeaching the president and the vice-president. Both of them are corrupt, but so is almost everyone else in brazilian politics.
So brazilians will have to see Temer president for now. At least until the investigation of Dilma’s and Temer’s 2014 campaing, carried out by TCU, comes to an end. If it happens until next year, Temer could be removed from office as well and elections would be held.
And by the way, Temer is not “demonstrably more corrupt”.
Take a look at a few important facts (by the editor of Epoca Magazine):
1. There are corrupt politicians both for and against the impeachment.
2. There is hard evidence that the Petrobras and other state-owned schemes consisted in a business model to pro-government politicians.
3. There is evidence that a lot of Congressmen in Brazil, mainly from government parties, have benefited from the Petrobras scheme.
4. VP Temer has also, with the support of PMDB allies, appointed executives in Petrobras. These executives are accused of corruption.
5. Prosecutors point that this crime syndicate could not have operated without the Government’s orders or glaring omission.
6. Without the president’s approval, no one is appointed as a top Petrobras executive.
7. PT, PMDB, and PP were the parties that nominated the executives to Petrobras. PT is Dilma’s party. PMDB is VP Temer’s party.
8. Dilma and Lula appointed, or helped appoint, all Petrobras executives who were arrested under corruption charges. There is indisputable evidence that all – all – the Petrobras executives who were arrested took bribes in hidden Swiss accounts.
9. Dilma headed the Petrobras board during most of the years when this gargantuan scheme took place.
10. There is hard evidence that Dilma and Temer, her running mate, were elected with dirty money from the Petrobras bribery scheme.
“Hard evidence” against Dilma? So how come she hasn’t been formally prosecuted, or even accused of a crime yet? Let’s make it clear – you are defending the impeachment of a president who has been accused of no crime so far (other than being a bad president).
Dilma is very unpopular at the moment, for the same reasons presidents usually become unpopular: the economy is doing very poorly, while it was doing really well just a few years ago. Of course, there are external factors that account for it which are affecting a number of countries (the low price of oil and the slowdown of China) but heads of state usually bear most of the blame for economic downturns.
@ Leo, GH and Jose
Thank you for the responses. All shed some light on the dynamics. Really hard to understand given the unique institutional, legal, and political forces at play.
Obviously it is interesting that in Brazil that there can be a President and Vice President from different parties. Interesting how that actually works under normal circumstances much less present ones. I mean from the outside looking at Brazilian politics it would seem like Hillary Clinton choosing Ross Perot as a running mate, which in America would never happen.
Yes, that’s it. It’s absurd that Dilma’s party and Temer’s party were “allies” for so long. PT wanted the majority in congress, and PMDB wanted a slice of the pie.
What many journalists are failing to grasp is that this impeachment process is not a choice. Dilma commited many crimes (and it’s gonna be trialed for just a few of them) and she has to go. But Temer can’t stay long as well :)
Except you seem to live in a fantasy world. Once someone favored by corporate interests is in power, he won’t go anywhere. Indeed, the corruption scandal could very easily just vanish.
I’m the one living in a fantasy world?
There isn’t any party as favored by corporate interests as PT. Just take a look at Lava Jato’s investigations and campaign donations.
In Brazil, elections are disputed by officially constituted coalition of parties. The coalition forms the ticket. PT and PMDB have part of the same coalition for over a decade. So did PP, which is THE most corrupt party in Brazil. So when you hear that “other parties and people” are more implicated in the Petrobras scandal, keep in mind that they were part of the governing coalition and that is why they are implicated. The Petrobras scandal is a crime 100% of PT’s government, the opposition did not have access and influence in Petrobras.
GG and David have painted this picture of the crisis as PT on one side and the long-time opposition of corrupt parties on the other side with the plutocrats and the media. That is simply not true. The main party behind the impeachment is PT coalition partner. Some members continue to be allies of Dilma, including the President of the Senate who is now in charge of the impeachment process. GG highlighted the “surreal” fact that the impeachment was presided by a corrupt politician with more serious charges than Dilma. This continues to be true, but now it is an ally who is opposed to impeachment. GG omits this and describes a black-white situation which is not true.
This crisis is overwhelmingly an internal crisis of Dilma’s government, including the split between her and her VP. The VP is one other element of her rotten government.
So this idea that this is just
@ GH and Diogo
Thanks again for responses. Like I said, it is difficult for an outsider not well versed in Brazilian political history, or Brazilian political subtlety and the nature of governing coalitions therein, to truly grasp what is happening or why.
But sincerely thank you again. Seems very complicated and I hate to think the end result might be economic “austerity” for Brazil’s working class and poor, because “austerity” has been an inhumane and abysmal failure wherever it has been imposed.
There’s groups protesting for the impeachment (lead by the upper classes and movements like MBL, who are financed by the Koch Brothers), and there’s groups of anti-impeachment protesters.
The pro-impeachment groups are a little more in evidence right now because the big media companies are supporting the impeachment. Globo is our biggest TV channel and is the only channel the majority of the population watch. Together with their local affiliates, they also own the most popular radio stations and newspapers in most states, it’s basically a monopoly.
Also, a lot of people don’t care about politics, they’re too busy trying to earn a living to understand the nuances of the problem unfortunately.
It makes more sense once you compare it to the damage that the media conglomerates have done to the political discourse in the US. The same process is taking place in Brazil right now.
Who’s in the streets in favor of the impeachment is mostly an older (very white) middle class, who for years is trying to oust PT from the government by any means. They have a very fanatic, toxic discourse which not only doesn’t perceive any improvement in the country, but also blame PT for every problem we currently have.
But the great majority of the population doesn’t share this attitude. Dilma Rousseff has very low popularity for some time now, as she in 2014 promised wouldn’t implement cuts in social programs, but did nonetheless. So the majority of the population has no love for her. But it also doesn’t see any positive alternative. Who’s gonna assume power in her place? Which are the proposals they have? People perceive there isn’t any real, concrete alternative. And as the new power configuration starts to get clearer, the support for impeachment gets lower. In March, 68% supported the impeachment. By the beginning of April it was 61%. Today I suppose it’s even lower. The whole political class is very unpopular, not only her.
This is a very strange kind of a coup.
It is endorsed by 2/3 of the population, which have been protesting in the streets since 2013;
It is legitimated by the Supreme Court (and 8 out of 11 of the judges were appointed by Dilma’s Party);
It is orchestrated by every newspaper and magazine in the country;
It is voted in the parliament, composed only by elected politicians;
It was approved by more than 2/3 of 513 congressman;
Now it will have to be approved by the senate.
I comment each point:
1. It is endorsed by 2/3 of the population, which have been protesting in the streets since 2013;
Not true. The protests that begun in 2013 are a very complicated story, wich I cant address here. But they started as a very radical left-wing movement claiming for free transport, mixed with a kind of consensus against corruption in general, and, from there, a right wing, conservative (sometimes fascist) movement started going to streets.
However, this protests happened, most of the times, when there were a big propaganda by the mass media calling people to streets.
2. It is legitimated by the Supreme Court (and 8 out of 11 of the judges were appointed by Dilma’s Party);
The supreme court, so far, only legitimated the process, but did not make any statements on the content of the accusations.
3. It is orchestrated by every newspaper and magazine in the country;
Every major newspaper, magaznies and tv channels. As Glenn and David put it, theses corporations are controlled by few families and one church. The subsidiaries of these channels are controlled by politicians (although its illegal).
4. It is voted in the parliament, composed only by elected politicians;
Because of the way our elections works, few congressmen (36 out of 513) were actually elected by votes he/she got. The majority of the congressmen were chosen by the party, and got their chairs thanks to one or two congressmen of his party that got enough votes to elect himself and ‘drag along’ some collegues from the same party.
5. It was approved by more than 2/3 of 513 congressman;
Yes, for the sake of ‘their families, god, church and the end of corruption…’.
6. Now it will have to be approved by the senate.
It seems so…
1. Polls from march showed that 68% of brazilians were PRO impeachment. One poll from april showed that 60% were PRO impeachment.
I agree that the protests from 2013 were different than now. They were against corruption in general. But from 2014 onwards the protests began to be much more objective. And on 2015 and 2016 there were no doubts that the protests had 3 main goals: 1) The impeachment of Dilma Roussef; 2) ex-president’s Lula (head of PT, the politian that chose Dilma to succeed him) to be sent to jail; 3) The celebration of Lava Jato’s investigations, which unveiled the biggest corruption scandal in Brazil’s history.
2. That’s because the Supreme Court is acting according to its boundaries. The political institutions are working appropriately.
3. What would be their interest on removing Dilma from office? The government has never spent as much on propaganda as it does now. The “elites” never won as much money as they did with Lula and Dilma. Bankers never profited as much. And the biggest construction companies had illegal deals with government projects and profited hugely during the last 13 years. Now they’re going to jail…
4. That’s true and unfortunate. But what you are saying is that Brazil’s got an illegitimate and corrupt congress. Therefore it shouldn’t legislate or decide at all – for impeachment or against impeachment. Unfortunately, this is Brazil’s congress, and it is it’s duty to vote whether the impeachment goes forward or not.
5. Same point. The impeachment voting on congress was a show of horrors from both sides of the story. That does not mean its decision is not legitimate.
6. ok!
It’s only strange if you don’t understand how a soft coup works.
Well, I do understand how conspiracy theories work.
The term “coup” is being used by the government to manipulate its reduced supporters after the biggest corruption scandal in history.
The problem is that GG bought it.
Totally false. The last poll showed 60% favoring impeachment – AND ALMOST THE SAME AMOUNT WANTING TEMER IMPEACHED.
You can’t cite the pro-impeachment sentiment to depict Dilma’s removal as a vindication of democracy, while you try to install Temer, who a majority also want impeached.
Yes, Dilma is unpopular. The economy is horrible and she has no political skills and no real political base. But mature, healthy democracies don’t remove leaders 18 months after they win a national election because they’re unpopular.
You’re exploiting and destroying democracy, not upholding it – and when people see how you’ve empowered Temer and Cunha, I think you’ll find the outcomes unpleasant.
Impeaching the President and installing the person who vowed to implement the opposition’s neoliberal policies, against which the population voted a mere 18 months ago, is only considered beneficial for democracy within the walls of the Brazilian media echo chamber. They’ve created their own special bizarro world down there.
What about Dilma? Did she not implement the opposite of what she advertised? Of course they know they advertised a lie, and they were running an austerity plan with Mr Levy in order to tidy up the mess on time for Lula’s third term. The plan was aborted once the party started to fall like a castle of cards, thanks to the Car Wash operation. You seem to have very short memory, but we don’t.
Ok, so you listened to Dilma calling Lula to tell him to use his nomination as minister if he needed (obstruction of justice) and you still think this is about popularity?
Good job (as usual), Glenn. Are there any Brazilian media organizations besides your own resisting this coup?
Perhaps GG will have to consider his own safety and relocate after the fascists dictators take over. Really, the opposition representing the oligarchy as GG well knows are in tight with the US Empire and would want to do them favors to get in their good graces.
As to the corruption of the elite and the opposition I like to use the metaphor of the LA criminal gangs of the 1980s (maybe still exist) the Crips and the Bloods – you are oppressed by one or the other but not allowed to escape either.
When you see how the transnational elite, the global oligarchy, view the world – see VW – BP – Pfizer and many more – it could not be more clear that they have no place in their calculations for society or humanity and no interest what-so-ever in mitigating climate change.
If you see a way out from under the Empire of the Exceptionals let’s here it.
I’d love to see a listicle titled something like “best countries for democracy loving political refugees”.