The men and women who work at the National Security Agency were greeted, on March 31, 2003, with a cheery notice on their office computers. “Welcome to SIDtoday,” a new internal website announced, explaining that the communications team in the Signals Intelligence Directorate, the heart of the NSA, was launching the publication to keep employees abreast of what was happening inside the spy agency.
The website, SIDtoday, started modestly. Its inaugural article blandly described what it called “the analyst cockpit,” a portal for intelligence experts to access their data. The following day, which was April Fools’, SIDtoday posted an offbeat story about practical jokes, recounting how the Germans in World War II built a decoy air base, complete with planes, out of wood; the kicker, according to SIDtoday, was that the British realized the base was a decoy and dropped a wooden bomb on it. (Online fact-checkers have since declared the story a “well-traveled anecdote” of dubious accuracy.)
The April Fools’ article was at the frivolous end of the SIDtoday spectrum. Because it trafficked in “top-secret” information, SIDtoday lived in a classified environment that, over the years, allowed the agency’s spies to explain to each other, in a non-technical way, a surprising amount about what they were doing, how they were doing it, and why. In the first nine years of SIDtoday’s life, more than 4,500 stories were posted on the website, a gold mine of often mundane, occasionally revealing articles that made the agency human and comprehensible in a way that technical documents could not.
Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images
Functioning like a small-town newspaper, the staff of SIDtoday published question-and-answer articles with senior and mid-level officials who described their jobs and their motivations for doing them. Some articles were firsthand descriptions of important missions, as in the case of an NSA employee who went to Baghdad right after the Iraqi capital came under American control. “I rode the whole way in a five-ton truck, with easy access to thermite grenades that could be used to destroy our classified cargo in the event of an ambush,” he wrote at the end of 2003. Another story, by SID’s chief of staff, described how the agency helped with the rescue of Pfc. Jessica Lynch during the invasion (his article is included in the first batch of SIDtoday articles).
SIDtoday even assembled a stable of columnists over the course of its first nine years, contributors who wrote as a sideline to their day jobs at the agency. One column, called “Ask Zelda!,” was akin to “Dear Abby” for the intelligence community, written by a mid-level supervisor at the NSA who answered questions from readers, including one about what should be worn to the office on hot summer days. “Shorts and flip-flops don’t exactly convey the image of a fierce SIGINT warrior,” Zelda noted. Another column, “SIGINT Philosopher,” delved into the ethics of surveillance (reliably coming out on the favorable side) and was written by a language analyst who described a personal epiphany that came during a polygraph exam. “Signal v. Noise” explored the difficulties involved in collecting large amounts of data, while “SIGINT Curmudgeon” was written by a longtimer who waxed nostalgic about the good old days of eavesdropping. (None of these columns were up and running in the initial batch of SIDtoday just released by The Intercept, but I have written previously about “Ask Zelda!” and the “SIGINT Philosopher.” In both cases, The Intercept simultaneously published copies of the original columns.)
One of the cultural revelations in the archives of SIDtoday is the corporate language that was routinely used. Intelligence reports delivered to other government agencies were described as “products,” and there was a category called the “Counterterrorism Product Line.” Government agencies that received these reports were known as “customers,” and the NSA has an entire division called the “Customer Relationship Directorate.” One of the SIDtoday articles published today was titled “Dynamic Methods of Interaction With New and Existing Customers,” and it referred to “product line leaders” at the agency who created “customer support plans” that included details on what “each customer needs.” The customers mentioned in the article included the Department of Homeland Security, Secret Service, Missile Defense Agency, and Federal Reserve. The article was written by an official whose title was “acting chief, customer gateway.”
The SIDtoday articles also convey what officials at the agency were reading in their off-hours. Some articles included references to popular authors like the travel writer Bill Bryson, the New Yorker writer Malcolm Gladwell, and mid-century economist Herbert Simon. One of the articles released today was an enthusiastic review of the Neal Stephenson sci-fi novel Cryptonomicon, which was described in the article (written by a member of the communications team in the Signals Intelligence Directorate) as “an enthralling work that proves to be as much of a history lesson as an eye-opening thriller.”
The articles, almost uniformly glowing about the NSA, serve as reminders that the men and women who surveil the world are not machines; they have good days and bad days, jokes and tears, and strange tales about their lives. A two-part article from 2005, “‘Odd Jobs’ Before NSA,” listed unconventional occupations that some employees had before joining the world’s largest electronic spying organization. The prior jobs included being a craps dealer in Las Vegas, a developer of crossword puzzles for the New York Times, a professional baseball player in the Atlanta Braves farm system, a nanny for the daughter of Sunny von Bülow’s first husband, and a “mosquito bite test count subject” who was paid to visit forests and swamps to take off his shirt for a minute to assess the local mosquito population.
SIDtoday even offers a window into the hopes and wide-eyed wonder of the agency’s youngest workers, its summer interns. The title of one intern’s article for SIDtoday in 2004 was “How I Spent My Summer Vacation,” while another article in 2011 recounted that on their first day of work, a boisterous group of interns stepped into an elevator and got a quick and stern lecture from “an older gentleman” who warned that “the only thing you need to know is that we don’t talk in the elevators, and the extroverts look at other people’s shoes.” The interns silently shared the same reaction — “What have we gotten ourselves into?”
Related Stories:
“The corporate language that was routinely used…” This “corporate” language does not have to do with the NSA specifically. I work on IT contracts for my state. This language comes from IT business analysis and is used industry-wide. It is standard usage for state or federal government technology projects — including non-sensitive agencies, such as health departments and social services. When working on software upgrades we refer to the people in agencies who will be using the product as “customers” and also sometimes “business stakeholders.” But an interesting thing to note is that this corporate-speak originated with private industry contractors hired to develop technology for government agencies. And today, the government agencies have adopted their language for internal use.
Jun 7, 2013 William Binney – The Government is Profiling You (The NSA is Spying on You)
https://youtu.be/qB3KR8fWNh0
January 9, 2014 500 Years of History Shows that Mass Spying Is Always Aimed at Crushing Dissent
It’s Never to Protect Us From Bad Guys
No matter which government conducts mass surveillance, they also do it to crush dissent, and then give a false rationale for why they’re doing it.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/01/government-spying-citizens-always-focuses-crushing-dissent-keeping-us-safe.html
May 15, 2016 Under the Constitution, Should the NSA Exist?
Is the NSA Constitutional? Learn how it was created in total secrecy – and decide for yourself.
“My view is this: Under the Constitution, the NSA shouldn’t even exist.” -Michael Boldin, Tenth Amendment Center
https://youtu.be/RqmNvNH23xU
Why would the federal reserve be a customer? Should they not be considered as federal as FedEx?
Why don’t you mention the Department of Agriculture?
Well that little anecdotal comment ought to bring out the 9-11 Truther loons in about 20 mins to spam this thread into unreadability . . . “It was obviously teh nanothermite you fools! It was teh inside operation you fools! Whatabout WTC 7, WTC 7, WTC 7?!”
Which is not to suggest thermite grenades do not exist because they do, only that “nanothermite” metastable intermolecular composites or thermobaric munitions did not cause the WTC towers to fall, which only the truther loons believe.
Hmmm, guess not. That’s refreshing.
Hope you are right. This article illustrates the evil of the organizational mind. This operation was heaven sent for messianic fools to make a playground. All it needed was secrecy which it got up until now. Snowden deserves a statue in New York Harbor.
Looks like the budget for the 911Truthiness campaign run by Karl Rove (aka ‘Turd Blossom’) & friends to smear anti-war protesters as brain-dead ‘conspiracy theorists’ was cut some years ago; hence the collapse in the number of (apparent) raving nutcases filling comments sections with that drivel.
That PR campaign was also designed to cover up the fact that the Bush team took no action to prevent the attacks despite multiple warnings from foreign intelligence agencies, field FBI offices, and some CIA officers about ‘impending hijackings in the United States). Notably the Aug 6th Presidential Daily Briefing and the July 10 meeting between the CIA’s Cofer Black, George Tenet and Condi Rice in which similar warnings were delivered, but were entirely ignored – you’d think a directive to warn airlines to increase alertness would have gone out, or something similar, but instead no action at all was taken. Such incompetence, even if not deliberate, is embarrassing and politically damaging – just look how Trump exploited it to send Jeb Bush running off in humiliation.
One of the best analysis of that whole putrid episode was written by Douglas Rushkoff, “Conspiracies of Dunces”:
https://arthurmag.com/2007/09/20/rushkoff-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/
Quote: “9-11 theorists are unwittingly performing as the unpaid minions of the administration’s propaganda wing. (At least most of them are unpaid; no doubt, some of the loudest are working as contractors for the same agencies whose activities they pretend to deconstruct.)”
No, the only actual ‘false flag’ attacks related to 9/11 were the 9/18 and 10/9 “we are Islamic terrorists” anthrax mailings, which conveniently shut down Congress right as the Patriot Act was being debated (it passed c. 10/25, with the Hart Senate Office Building in decontamination). The investigation into those attacks was a massive coverup; neither Hatfill (suspect 1, who got a multi-million dollar settlement for false accusations) or Ivins (suspect 2, a convenient suicide) could have done it – and indeed the Ivins suicide was curiously reminescent of the ‘suicide’ of British bioweapons expert David Kelly in 2003, most likely engineered by British intelligence on Blair’s orders. My guess is that the anthrax attacks were a Cheney-Libby operation using material snuck out of Dugway Utah. Notice how the 911 Truthiness campaign never talked about that issue? Fed right into the ‘Iraq has WMDs’ campaign, as well. Regardless of FBI claims to the contrary, that case is still open.
And you can substantiate your information, how?
What does the excerpt have to do with 9-11? They are two different events requiring two different forms of analysis. In any of the scientific documents I have read about the buildings involved on 9-11, no one has ever mentioned anything about thermite grenades only that traces of thermite were found in the debris and dust, which is an indication of nuclear use.