I’m pleased to announce that The Intercept’s new technology reporter is Sam Biddle. Biddle comes to us from Gawker, where his dogged reporting has exposed Uber’s subversion of American labor, Facebook’s data-mining ploys, teenage hackers, and startup malfeasance. At The Intercept, Biddle will be focusing on the themes we care about — the need to hold powerful institutions accountable, the ways in which technology can undermine privacy — in a realm that has not received enough adversarial coverage: Silicon Valley.
As many have lately observed, the tech giants have acquired, along with their tremendous cultural and financial power, a sense of entitlement to a certain kind of treatment by the press. The recent actions of Peter Thiel — who funded the retaliatory lawsuits that drove Gawker Media into bankruptcy last week — are an extreme manifestation of a larger trend. The Intercept, which was founded with the backing of eBay entrepreneur and philanthropist Pierre Omidyar, was built on the principle that we’d have ample resources to defend our First Amendment freedoms, and thus be able to responsibly report on any power center or industry without fear while at the same time enjoying full editorial independence. That framework has enabled us to commit to ramping up the kind of public interest reporting on the tech industry that may not always please its subjects, but which we believe is more vital than ever. “The power, software, and money created by Silicon Valley has never had a greater reach into our institutions and living rooms, and it’s exactly that kind of influence I’m excited to report and investigate at The Intercept,” says Biddle.
In other recent Intercept news, Multimedia Reporter Alice Speri joined us from Vice, where she had been a staff writer for Vice News and a producer and correspondent for VICELAND. Her writing has been published by Al Jazeera America, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Christian Science Monitor, AFP, DNAinfo, the Electronic Intifada, and the Star-Ledger, among other outlets. At The Intercept, her beat is policing, race, immigration, and criminal justice in America.
And Moiz Syed is our new data journalist and designer. Moiz was previously at the Wikimedia Foundation where he led design efforts on projects supporting transparency and free knowledge. He is interested in technology, surveillance, and U.S. politics, and he will be working with our data and design team to enliven our coverage with data-driven graphics. You can read more about Moiz and his work and interests on his website.
Sam needs to create more awareness of the privacy threats of pervasive technologies, and also to initiate much more aggressive and widespread debate on the threat to employment that AI and robotics, 3D Printing, smart machines, delivery drones, self drive vehicles, and self service portal represents across multiple industries. The Intercept,Sam and Intercept readers need to ensure that Intercept technology articles are posted in Linkedin too.
Well, my proposal for Sam Biddle: make an article about connection between sillicon valey and in-q-tel, the cia venture company that connects the cia and sillicon valley.
Ás I said in the past, I can repeat, I believe that the intercept should stay closed group of people, accepting new people gives a good chance to the NSA/CIA to infiltrate the intercept and to sabotage it during the time.
The VICE owner is for me closely connected with the president of the United Robbers of America, i.e. with the secret service, I don’t trust to the Vice’s journalists, although they can get a job in theory without to be spies. But to work for Vice or CNN, it is like to work for mastercard that blocked donations for wikileaks. Beside it, I don’t think it is a good “pedigree” when you say that somebody had his article published in many media owned by rich people who collaborate with the colonial government and participate in the war propaganda. Corporate media are not grassroots media, they sell themselves for money, they participate in war, and some owners of media can even profit from the war. rich people have money invested in many companies, in the media too. Petreus invested more than billion USD in media in small Serbia, obviously not because of profit than because of influence on the way of thinking of people (about politicians, about Russia, etc). Media business and reporting are dirty in many ways.
Continuing the spree of questionable to the point of highly questionable hires with Biddle in order to further drive this site into the ground, I see.
Moiz: Please look into the potential security and privacy issues that have cropped up on here.
Not familiar with Speri.
Good luck to all. But I am very leery of Biddle and his bullying & dramatic track record. Why do it?
Here is something of interest for the new guy who could investigate SV much further.
It’s a mad house up there in SV. Exponential ponzi schemes spread across all technological fields and replaced solid R&D with feeding frenzy off the great plastic faces, fashionable pretenders, delusional unicorns who know nothing.
Look closely in government subsidized electric car fiasco, useless and ridiculously expensive battery con, rocket toy play subsidized entirely by taxpayer money. Look into other SV technology psychedelic gurus from fb and Google and billions un-audited phantom click from bots liken to their CEOs .
Look into their incoherent utterances about billion dollar failed toys only confirm already common knowledge about a ZIRP fueled Wall Street cronies trying to realize their sick dreams, we are paying for dearly.
Investigate all those SV geniuses unable to get hard on with sex, booze and drugs forced to get high on gigantic lies, orgasmic chaos, blow up toys and inhumane exploitation of their cheerleading, greed addicted serfs funded by Hindu and Chinese VC firms while stealing whatever expertise and know-how, IP left and throwing American engineers out on the streets with nothing.
Open your readers eyes to see an irrefutable fact that no man, woman or child has no reason in the world to have wealth of one billion dollars or more even if he/she is a superman or woman, king of beheaders or epidermic queen of sloth, honest thief or thieving banker, Hollywood fickle celebrity on drugs or hard headed propagandist pundit living on booze, dwarf genius from BoonGoogle or detestable retarded robot from Assbook, oracle from Nebraska or decomposing Hungarian Jew from London, free market worshiping grocery monopolist or free trade worshiping IP protectionist, crooked senator or lying politician, former corrupted government official selling access or army general selling weapons, former disgraced president or future disgraced president.
Tell people that nobody, genius or retard, deserves to control obscene wealth of one billion dollars or more for any reason at all and all remaining oligarchs with less than a billion dollars must come up with pretty good explanation for how and why they stole it from blood, sweat and tears of millions of hard working people in the world before they loose it and return from their sick delusional dream of grandeur and superhumanity into physical and social reality shared by all of us.
If it happens it would be good for their mental health. I guarantee that.
What don’t you write about that.
May be if they heed your call they will no longer want to blast themselves into pieces of oligarchic fodder via hyperlooping their butts directly to Saint Francis or spaceoneing themselves in to oblivion of vacuum cleaner but that would actually not be a bad thing for humanity.
This is a dumb decision. How can you expect this guy to objectively report on tech with his track record? Goodbye Intercept, I had alot of hope for you, but its not going to work out.
Saying that kicking a dog isn’t any different than kicking a rock when morality isn’t considered, due to an animal’s lack of “rationality”, reflects a lack of empathy.
I trust in The Interecept. However, I wouldn’t trust this new writer with anything that requires empathy… I sure he will be able to expose much and do his job well, but I honestly have no faith in this person’s empathy.
He can get angry. But can he feel bad? (Yes, I am totally basing this on what LITTLE I has seen from this person’s tweets… But his articles seem fine to me. Just his opinions worry me.)
I really don’t understand how this hire fits in with the Intercept’s mission. I come here because I appreciate the counter point to what I get from more mainstream sources like NPR. If the intercept clearly isolates this guy on his own column so I don’t have to read gossip drivel coming out of silicon valley, I will keep coming. If he gets front and center doing even more snarky and vicious reporting with the same lack of substance that we got from some Zaid’s earlier work, it may be time to take a break. There’s only so much “everything is broken and everyone is a POS” that I can take from a media outlet, and I have a pretty high tolerance for that (I come here after all).
I’m sad to hear this. I have no idea what he is like personally, but as a ‘journalist’, Biddle is not a nice guy. He is a bully and an asshole. It was people like him that Gawker got rid of in order to become 20% nicer. As in, he is not nice. Maybe he has changed, maybe he can do better. Maybe focusing on people who really do deserve public focus, rather than ordinary folks as he did at gawker, will work out for Biddle. But I’m not looking forward to the sort of snark and viciousness he brought to gawker.
This was the worst guy over there. Not due is idiotic call for a return to bullying, but this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jtmFlUg56w
Better and better! Wonderful additions to get these journalists.
I have marked The Intercept as most trusted news source and especially appreciate the succinct yet thorough writing. Quite accomplished cutting through to the heart of matters most cogent in today’s chaotic cacophony of information.
Well done, Sam. It’s a very sad situation with Gawker (by the way, has FirstLook taken an official stance on the case? Apologies if I missed it), but any way to secure the future of talented journalists from that outlet is most welcome.
Great! More SV coverage is needed. Just look at Palantir – one of many companies with creepy CIA backing…
It is an unavoidable dilemma, I suppose, in the modern world to accept money from the very oligarchs behind so many of the issues which are here reported. It is something which is unavoidably ever present in the minds of readers.
I do not suggest in any way that the reporting or the reporters at the Intercept are corrupt or corrupted. I do not believe they are, and I trust they have the experience to detect problems they may have faced elsewhere.
On the other hand, influence can be subtle and creep in even with the best efforts of honest people.
Sorry, but I have no confidence in oligarchs when they claim to be doing things for reasons other than their personal profit and power.
I should be glad to see a Gawker reporter land on his feet — though I actually have no idea how The Intercept compares to Gawker in terms of audience or salary. Whatever assets Gawker has, it should be clear that the reporters are the only one that really matters. Is there any chance though that First Look Media could cobble together some kind of “virtual Gawker” should that site be completely destroyed? I mean, get multiple web archiving services to back up all their stories, provide an external index to the site, and set up (at least) a webring for ex-Gawker reporters to promote each others’ stories. I feel like somebody ought to do some of this stuff…
It is at least reassuring to see Owen Thomas, who wrote the original Peter Thiel story, turning up as the SF Chronicle business editor ( http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Owen-Thomas-named-Chronicle-s-business-editor-6871226.php ) – again, I don’t know journalism, but that can’t be too bad a thing. I had been worried Thiel would continue his crusade against people from Gawker wherever they went and get them all blacklisted by a cowed media, and at least *that* didn’t come to pass… or is there something I don’t know?
Isn’t this the same Sam Biddle who believes in bullying, specifically bullying nerds?
Very disappointing. I would have The Intercept to steer clear of a writer who have exhibited such a clear lack of morals and ethics.
“That framework has enabled us to commit to ramping up the kind of public interest reporting on the tech industry…”
This is great news. Maybe start by covering the spyware/OS known as “Windows 10″.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/Tag/windows%2010
Good to see that you’ll pay more attention Silicon Valley. Your coverage of surveillance didn’t quite feel comprehensive when ignoring the private/economically-motivated side of the issue.
Welcome aboard. Look forward to reading your work.
Good, let’s hear about NSLs to software and hardware producers…
One of the few places the truth comes out. Glad to see more of you. Thank you.
I don’t know where to post this, but something I find disturbing, in addition to the “owned” media we have to put up with, is the fact that I kept running into Internet domain sites that are “GoDaddy.com” owned:
“GoDaddy is a publicly traded Internet domain registrar and web hosting company. As of January 2016, GoDaddy was said to have had more than 61 million domain names under management, making it the world’s largest ICANN-accredited registrar.” It’s revenue is almost $1.45 billion.
This is one area where the ownership of Internet domain could fall to one or a few companies, and I find it disturbing. It might be a case of where we need a tighter antitrust law. Would anyone be interested in doing a story on this? I find it frightening that a PR company could be in cahoots with these people, too–or work for companies like Mon*santo, Big Pharma companies, etc. I didn’t research it further. But it could definitely be another source of propaganda, etc., that could get out of hand that we don’t need.
Gawker has always seemed like a terrible celebrity gossip site, to the extent that Thiel can almost be a sympathetic character for vowing to take them down after they ran a story outing him as gay. That said, The Intercept is more or less my primary source of news and I’m not familiar enough with Biddle’s work specifically to condemn him based on his previous association with a TMZ-style publication. I trust the Intercept staff in their assessment of his qualifications and hope he puts forward some good stories.
Sam Biddle? THE Sam Biddle whose 1 tweet fuelled one entire year of #gamergate and whose single tweet cost his employer a 7 digit $ amount?
Congrats. That’s a choice that will go down in your company’s history for sure :-)
(BTW: In case you might not know this: By hiring Biddle, you’ve just acquired a 6 digit amount of eternal enemies who will by their own volition target your business whenever it pleases them. And boy are they good at it. Ask Biddle. Prepare.)
Biddle…. Nice. I’ve missed Valleywag. Can’t wait to see what you write here.
Sam Biddle doesn’t have to be your reporter Sam Biddle is over
Moiz Syed’s work is inspiring and so, so, so well done!
Oh, so YOU’RE the ones giving sanctuary to Sam “Bring Back Bullying” Biddle.
That’s cool fam.
Any outfit that would hire that shady POS is suspect as hell.
#GamerGate will watching.
You are hired a man to cover Silicon Valley who has publicly professed the belief that “nerds should be constantly shamed and degraded into submission.” That will be very helpful for any future lawyer attempting to demonstrate “malice” in a libel suit against TheIntercept.
Bringing back bullying to the Intercept? Beautiful.
2nd. This is the worst move they could make for a tech reporter. An advocate of bullying, a known sophist and liar, a known quantity in Gawker’s downfall and generally a biased, unpleasant person. I had so much hope for the Intercept when I first saw Scahill plugging it ages ago, and I’ve been impressed with pretty much all of their coverage, even the slightly partisan Bernie coverage (which I agreed with as I like Sanders). However, the addition of Biddle may actually make me stop reading. A sad day for journalism! :(
Sam Biddle is the same idiot that said bullying nerds is fine. Great job intercept
Isn’t Sam Biddle the guy that actually promoted internet bullying a couple years back? It looks like I won’t be reading the Intercept anymore…
Awesome! I can’t wait for Biddle to start using the Intercept to destroy the lives of random people for stupid tweets, and writing new articles on them years later every time they get a new job and try to rebuild their lives.
Because nothing says quality journalism like the poster boy of every article on social media lynching.
Biddle will be a great addition to The Intercept team. He did some great work at Gawker and Valleywag so it’s nice to hear that he’s going to be able to keep doing that.
I am so amazed at the growth of The Intercept since you came on board. Great writers, truly “fearless adversarial journalism.” Thanks from all of us who want to be informed.
It’s true – some of the comments threads here run into literally hundreds of posts.