An interagency review board has determined that Guantánamo detainee Mohamedou Ould Slahi poses no threat to the United States and has recommended that he be released, setting the bestselling author on the path to be reunited with his family.
Slahi was arrested in his native Mauritania in 2001, and was held and tortured in secret prisons in Afghanistan and Jordan before being secreted to Guantánamo, an odyssey he recounted in a memoir, Guantánamo Diary, which became a bestseller last year. He has been imprisoned for over 14 years without being charged with a crime.
In early June, Slahi made his case to the Periodic Review Board as part of a sort of parole process instituted by the Obama administration to evaluate the cases of the remaining men at Guantánamo to determine if they might be safely transferred to another country.
At that hearing, Slahi’s advocates, including his lawyer and two representatives from the military, described his plans to continue writing and to start a small business, and noted the strong network of family and other supporters who could help him. They spoke to his unusual language skills and warm relationship with his lawyers and even the guards assigned to him. The military representatives described him as “an advocate for peace” and stated they were “certain that Mohamedou’s intentions after Guantánamo are genuine, and that he possesses sound judgment, and that he is good for his word.” One former guard submitted a letter attesting that he “would be pleased to welcome [Slahi] into my home.” (In keeping with the general secrecy of proceedings at Guantánamo, Slahi was not allowed speak during the open portion of the review, and he declined to have his own statement from the closed session made public.)
In a document dated July 14 but released today, the board members noted Slahi’s “highly compliant behavior in detention,” “candid responses to the Board’s questions,” and “clear indications of a change in the detainee’s mindset.” They had also taken into consideration his “robust and realistic plan for the future.”
Slahi has admitted to traveling to Afghanistan in the early 1990s to fight with the mujahideen against the Soviet-backed government, and the government claims he helped recruit and facilitate the travel of al Qaeda fighters. In 2010, a federal judge found that he was not a member of al Qaeda when the U.S. picked him up; the judge ordered his release, but that case stalled on appeal.
The board’s recommendation on a detainee is just a first step. The secretary of defense must arrange for a country to receive him and notify Congress of the transfer. In Slahi’s case, the government of Mauritania has already indicated that it would be willing to take him back.
One of Slahi’s lawyers, Hina Shamsi of the American Civil Liberties Union, said they were pressing the Pentagon to arrange for his actual release as soon as possible, but the exact timing is uncertain.
“We will now work toward his quick release and return to the waiting arms of his loving family,” said Nancy Hollander, another of his lawyers, in a statement. “This is long overdue.”
Slahi’s mother and one of his brothers died while he was imprisoned, and his father died nearly three decades ago. But he has 10 other siblings and has described plans to “take care of his sisters.”
There are currently 76 men still held in Guantánamo. Including Slahi, 31 of them have been approved for release. Last week, the Obama administration sent a Yemeni prisoner to Italy and another Yemeni and a Tajik detainee to Serbia; those countries agreed to accept them as “humanitarian gestures.” It seems that the administration is prioritizing moving out as many people as possible from the approved list before the end of the year, as it looks increasingly unlikely that Guantánamo will actually be closed before Obama leaves office.
I’m sorry for the behavior of my government. I support the investigation of war crimes including torture of prisoners of war, starting with our commander-in-chief. I also believe reparations are due to the victims of our empire’s unlawful behavior.
I wish Mohamedou Ould Slahi a long and happy life and kudos to the guard who wrote that letter – admirable, courageous and humane. But, the reckless disregard for life, the carelessness, the irresponsibility of the authorities, the courts, the judges that allowed him to be held for so long (allowed him to be held at all) tortured and abused, will always remain a travesty of justice.
I take it no apology or compensation was offered. Not that it would erase the 14 years of inhumanity and injustice shown Mohamedou Ould Slahi or make it easier for him to live with the memory. But, it would have been a step towards owning and recognizing it as a grave dereliction of duty, justice and humanity, not to mention a grievous, criminal, breach of US Law and the Geneva Conventions.
Here’s hoping that Obama will finally fulfill his promise to close down that hell hole, that stain on humanity, due process and justice to everyone held there.
Effectively held in Prison because he did what America funded the Mujahadeen to do, fight the Soviets, not in Afghanistan during the invasion, not a member of Al Qaeda! One of those hundreds and Hundreds arrested for NO CRIME by the US just to make it look good and that they were doing something about 9/11 which the Administration had previously ignored at the orders of a President and Vice President that are too scared to leave America themselves lest they be arrested for War Crimes!
U.S.A. is Terrorist #1 at home and abroad; doing what it does best.
The nsa in particular, I think.
When are they going to publicly and officially admit that they (the nsa) generate CGI images of people (including children who are unaware of what the nsa is and does) showering, sleeping, urinating, and defecating, and fornicating? I hope they come to their senses soon and decide that’s it in their best interest to do so before people figure out how pleasing it is for them to spy on them while they carry out those daily tasks illegally without their permission, consent or knowledge, and that the technology used to do so should be used to prevent mass rape and mass murder, not enable fascist racist supporters of mass murder who help the terrorist organization that is the nsa perpetuate mass murder, rape and racism simply for temporary economic and political gain.
100% correct; it is crazy and despicable what U.S.A. Terrorist #1 does.
Citing “clear indications of a change in the detainee’s mindset” as a reason for release, when that detainee HAS NEVER EVEN BEEN CHARGED WITH A CRIME, let alone given a trial, is utterly disgraceful. How many Guantanamo detainees have committed crimes worse than the arbitrary detainment and torture (for years) of scores of people from around the world. I suspect very few if any.
76 are still held in PRISON.
31 of them have been cleared for release, but are still held in PRISON.
Of the 45 who are not cleared,
how many have or would be found guilty in a real court of law,
instead of in a rigged system in a military PRISON?
The bill of rights of the faking U$A is now
a lousy pretense of hypocrisy and imperialism.
How many https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#Signatories_to_Statement_of_Principles of these would be found guilty in a real court of law?
Releasing people not convicted of any crime is one of those basic things you’d expect from a democracy. But more and more it just seems like pure corruption. The purpose of keeping the Guantanamo prison really isn’t to use it – the captives aren’t worth anything much and nobody would dream of introducing more into the bureaucratic quagmire. It must just be so that somebody can get paid to keep the racket going. So *who*? Whose monthly paycheck is worth more than the reputation of the United States of America?
Call me stupid. If the commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces cannot simply issue an order to release captives of so-called war, how in the heck would anyone be concerned about the same commander’s order to nuke anything?
It is due to the asymmetry of our national perception of security. The Commander in Chief could indeed issue the order to release the prisoners, but it would start a political firestorm that would require that the Commander in Chief adopt a firm, moral position, he is quite obviously incapable of doing. On the other hand, the only people who would object to his starting a nuclear war are relatively weak, politically, and thus not threatening. All that would need to happen would be for Wall Street to give the word. It is unfortunate from their point of view that they have not yet figured out how to make money on the total destruction of civilization. As they have figured out how to make money on the destruction of the environment and the mass extinctions that are its consequences, we should not feel to sanguine about the fact they haven’t figured out the nuclear war profit angle yet.
Fun story, the first fission reaction to go critical was done by some genius right in the middle of Chicago. We’ve got some really amazing oversight if you know what I mean….
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Pile-1