Updated | 12:28 p.m.
As Donald Trump shouted for 76 minutes on Thursday night about how horrible everything is in the dystopian fiction he’s confused for America, a former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan found himself nodding along in agreement.
So the white supremacist David Duke, who was nearly elected governor of Louisiana in 1991 by channeling white resentment, posted a rave review of the address on Twitter.
Great Trump Speech, America First! Stop Wars! Defeat the Corrupt elites! Protect our Borders!, Fair Trade! Couldn't have said it better!
— David Duke (@DrDavidDuke) July 22, 2016
A few hours later, as Duke announced that he was joining the race for an open Senate seat in Louisiana, he added: “I’m overjoyed to see Donald Trump, and most Americans, embrace most of the issues I’ve championed for years. My slogan remains, ‘America First.’”
Trump’s fearmongering speech — which featured a chilling distillation of his calls for a ban on Muslims entering the United States in the line, “We don’t want them in our country!” — was also praised by Geert Wilders, a Dutch nationalist politician who was in the hall.
Great speech @realDonaldTrump !#RNCinCLE pic.twitter.com/BTuYEg7EaR
— Geert Wilders (@geertwilderspvv) July 22, 2016
In an interview on Wednesday, Wilders pledged to “close the Dutch borders for immigrants from Islamic countries immediately” if he becomes prime minister of the Netherlands next year.
And former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who foreshadowed Trump’s tone in his own address Monday night, also had high praise.
Rudy Reacts to Trump: 'Best Acceptance Speech I've Ever Seen!' https://t.co/AKJMOtAo6O pic.twitter.com/z9qS9ozlUS
— FoxNewsInsider (@FoxNewsInsider) July 22, 2016
Trump’s long, error-riddled address — which began with the boast that he’d won 14 million votes (or 2.8 million less than Hillary Clinton) — went down less well with critics of the candidate, including members of his own party like Michael Gerson, a former speechwriter for George W. Bush, and Stuart Stevens, who ran Mitt Romney’s campaign in 2012.
He is summoning primal forces of anger/fear, displaying leadership without moral guardrails, religious principles or civic responsibility.
— Michael Gerson (@MJGerson) July 22, 2016
Give him credit for this: @realDonaldTrump is a dark, disturbed man & he sees in the country what he sees in the mirror.
— stuart stevens (@stuartpstevens) July 22, 2016
The speech, which in tone and content was reminiscent of the opening salvo of his campaign last year — when he hyped fears about Mexican immigrants being rapists and criminals — was also panned from the other side of the political spectrum, by Sen. Bernie Sanders, watching at home, and Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin, a protester who interrupted Trump’s speech by unfurling a banner that said “build bridges not walls” — and was dragged from the hall.
#RNCwithBernie pic.twitter.com/x5nuSI6AuN
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) July 22, 2016
Trump: “I alone can fix this.”
Is this guy running for president or dictator? #RNCwithBernie— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) July 22, 2016
Watch @codepink's @medeabenjamin interrupt @realdonaldtrump's remarks at #RNCinCLE (via @paulblu) pic.twitter.com/57O55EvppX
— HuffPost Politics (@HuffPostPol) July 22, 2016
Here is footage of the anti Trump protester being dragged out of the arena: pic.twitter.com/WLXMFL11ZY
— Olivia Nuzzi (@Olivianuzzi) July 22, 2016
I just disrupted #Trump to say BUILD BRIDGES NOT WALLS!! https://t.co/OX5U5iqacy pic.twitter.com/1jQwGyw9iD
— Medea Benjamin (@medeabenjamin) July 22, 2016
Those negative reviews were amplified by an array of Trump critics, including the rapper Chuck D, Russian dissident Garry Kasparov, and satirist Jon Stewart, who borrowed Stephen Colbert’s Late Show desk to deliver some analysis.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Trump speech alienated 70% of USA the rest have stock in the confederacy & klan #ToldYall
— Chuck D (@MrChuckD) July 22, 2016
I’ve heard this sort of speech a lot in the last 15 years and trust me, it doesn’t sound any better in Russian.
— Garry Kasparov (@Kasparov63) July 22, 2016
If Leni Riefenstahl were alive, Trump would hire her to film this speech. Then not pay her.
— Norman Ornstein (@NormOrnstein) July 22, 2016
This from Andrew Sullivan captures Trump's prepared remarks quite well https://t.co/wwaDBMBWJF pic.twitter.com/0uA2aRqtxy
— Shadi Hamid (@shadihamid) July 22, 2016
This speech sounds like Mexican state elections where throwing the incumbent governor in prison is a popular campaign promise. #RNCinCLE
— David Agren (@el_reportero) July 22, 2016
The reassuring thing about Trump's speech is no-one will fall for such a deceitful mix of xenophobia, made-up "facts" and lies. Oh. #Brexit
— David Schneider (@davidschneider) July 22, 2016
–@realDonaldTrump is crazier and more nassacistic than Gaddafi was #RNCinCLE
— josh stacher (@jstacher) July 22, 2016
The question isn't how the speech sounded in the hall, but to Americans locked in their panic rooms and bomb shelters.
— Conor Friedersdorf (@conor64) July 22, 2016
A system in which a charismatic figure says only he can fix things, restore order and expel unwanted groups. There should be a name for that
— Doug Saunders (@DougSaunders) July 22, 2016
Keep thinking of this… pic.twitter.com/RPS2Ir29hM
— Lisa Tozzi (@lisatozzi) July 22, 2016
Folks, we should really stop with the Hitler comparisons. Trump is a lot more like Mussolini. pic.twitter.com/4Y0Wsjt68z
— Bearded Stoner (@beardedstoner) July 22, 2016
Mussolini, in a rare English speech, saluted "my fellow citizens, who are working to make America great." pic.twitter.com/oUnk6f0ArY
— Alexis C. Madrigal (@alexismadrigal) July 22, 2016
Here is Jon Stewart’s @colbertlateshow monologue from tonight. Well worth your time. https://t.co/itI3oLvsc0
— Dave Itzkoff (@ditzkoff) July 22, 2016
All was not lost for the candidate, however, since the night did win him at least one well-known supporter: the former chief executive of Turing Pharmaceuticals, Martin Shkreli, who was charged with securities fraud last year.
Trump has my unmitigated endorsement. It was hard won and I was skeptical. The entire Trump family convinced me.
— Martin Shkreli (@MartinShkreli) July 22, 2016
This article looks like an exercise in guilt by association. As in, All the trendy people hate Trump, shouldn’t you hate Trump too? The problem is, these people cited as Trump naysayers are extremely partisan, to the point where they can’t be objective. It is possible (although rare these days) to be liberal and still have some common sense.
Some interesting points:
The savings in military spending is supposed to come from reducing our NATO expenditures. So when Trump say’s he is reducing military spending, it isn’t coming from domestic weapons programs. Some of those savings could be recycled into his infrastructure program.
Glass-Steagall is back on the table for the debates with Hillary. The original Glass-Steagall was about five pages long. I wonder if they will bring back all the legal decisions that were based on it.
NAFTA, TPP, TTIP are probably dead or attenuated in a Trump administration. Tariffs are a possibility.
I wonder what else Trump has up his sleeve going into the general election. Should be interesting.
The film Clinton Cash comes out today. That also could be interesting.
Michael Hudson had some interesting thing to say about Trump’s speech.
http://www.unz.com/mhudson/trump-policy-will-unravel-traditional-neocons/
Hammering Trump on the Muslim ban is a weird choice, since the Intercept itself has published that it is way more popular than he is: https://theintercept.com/2016/07/07/donald-trump-backs-off-muslim-ban-but-its-already-way-more-popular-than-he-is/?comments=1#comments Reducing the election to that issue would be great for him, especially since he’s really already flip-flopped on it a bit (like everything else).
There is not one blessed thing wrong with giving priority from national quotas to groups facing persecution. Admitting 10,000 Syrians? Make them Yazidis. (or Jews, if there are any left alive) Admitting Egyptians? Make them Copts. Admitting Iranians? Gays to the head of the line! It is not hard to displace the Muslims right out of the quotas without ever going beyond what would seem like common sense humanity.
David Duke is indeed an idiot for thinking that Trump, an avowed zionists, is going to “stop the wars.” Trump is an elite and he is corrupt, he also lies a lot and is very inconsistent. The person he picked for his VP supported the Iraq war and Trump defends him, calling it a “mistake.” But yet he’ll say Hillary shouldn’t be president based on that same “mistake.” It’s all schizophrenic nonsense from selfish charlatans who will say and defend anything in order to become the new face of the US empire.
But the fact that David Duke liked his speech or supports Trump is not an argument against Trump. Your attempt at guilt by association is pathetic and typical journalistic propaganda tactics. Duke also says “stop the wars” does that mean we shouldn’t stop them because some former KKK member says it? We wouldn’t want Duke to agree with us, now would we! Better keep killing people.
It seems that the massive and coordinated MSM demonization of Trump is failing in its mission. Trump is virtually tied with The Chosen One despite her being the best-known, best-financed, best-propagandized presidential candidate in history. What saddens me is that The Intercept, which I had high hopes for when I discovered it, has jumped onto the MSM bandwagon and become just another Hail Hillary, Trash Trump mouthpiece for the Clinton campaign.
few if any of trump’s supporters give a shit what any of those people think whether pro or con. that’s the ACTUAL parallel with brexit that you and other “fuck democracy if it isn’t to MY enlightened tastes” types seem to miss. the whining and fear-mongering about fear-mongering will have as much impact as the same tactics when used by re(main)tards.
to the white trash voters outside of your yuppie bubble the speech rang true. trump is just the messenger but keep shooting him all the way until november if that’s what makes you feel better about supporting a candidate with gallons of blood on her psychopathic hands. otherwise get some education about how things got where they are. or maybe – god forbid – talk to someone who isn’t an effete, bourgeois and sanctimonious whiner. so…not jon stewart basically.
Trump tells us what we want to hear. Whether he means it, or can do it, is a book yet to be written.
The GOP establishment has lied for so long, stabbed us (conservatives) in the back so many times, that Trump has provided hope. He may turn out to be a reincarnation of PT Barnum, but for a while, there is a light in the darkness.
I bet Kissinger,Albright,the staff of all our ziorags,and probably Yahoo,if he could, would vote for the pos HB.
The company one keeps?David Duke has no blood on his hands either,while the above all celebrate death.
STOP WARS ?.?.? after all the trouble George W. Bush the WAR CRIMINAL went through to create them???
Bush Administration Convicted of War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity
The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal was convened and conducted according to internationally recognized procedures and rules of evidence, and the week-long hearing ended with the five-member panel unanimously delivering guilty verdicts. > > > OR
a 2004 Pentagon-commissioned report specified in listing the causes of terrorism: “American direct intervention in the Muslim world”; our “one-sided support in favor of Israel”; support for Islamic tyrannies in places like Egypt and Saudi Arabia; and, most of all, “the American occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.” The report concluded: “Muslims do not ‘hate our freedom,’ but rather, they hate our policies.” Countless individuals who carried out or plotted attacks on the West have said the same.
Nobody should need official reports or statements from attackers to confirm what common sense makes clear: If you go around the world for years proclaiming yourself “at war,” bombing and occupying and otherwise interfering in numerous countries for your own ends — as the U.S. and U.K. have been doing for decades, long before 9/11 —
TRUTH – JUSTICE – THE AMERICAN WAY while the Republicans change the laws to protect George W. Bush – protection for retired presidents was reduced to twenty years and re-instated to life to cover hiim
“Great Trump Speech, America First! Stop Wars! Defeat the Corrupt elites! Protect our Borders!, Fair Trade! Couldn’t have said it better!
— David Duke (@DrDavidDuke) July 22, 2016″
First off I can’t stand Trump or David Duke . Yet the quote from the latter and the general coverage of the former seems to be used as a tool for fear mongering, more than legitimate criticism. Lets start with David Duke. The issue with him is that he is a racist who believes in racial ideologies. Racial ideologies are not based in science or biology. They are a construct in the minds of men and have continuously created hate, oppression, misery, suffering, death and almost always ended in war in nearly every society that has engendered them, from: America’s slavery of blacks, Imperial Japan which subjugated Asia, to Nazi Germany, Apartheid South Africa, Hutu and Tutsi in Rwanda festering into brutal the civil wars, and Zionist Israel with their brutal oppression and genocide of Palestinians that they are currently engaged in.
The issue of concern with David Duke is not that endorses “America First! Stop Wars! Defeat the Corrupt elites! Protect our Borders!, Fair Trade” or likes blueberry pie, Netflix, or is against corporate subversion of our democracy, ect. By highlighting that David Duke is supporting “Fair Trade,” “Stopping war,” is against corrupt elites, or endorses attending to America’s interest first, there is now an implied racism that is now associated with those issues just because a racist person agrees or supports them. An example of the opposite side of the same coin are people who think (incorrectly) all Jews (their views and/or believes) are evil because of the racist actions of the Jewish state of Israel.
Now with Trump I could write a book, but for the sake of time I will limit it to one point. Pictures of Trump and a potential ad is circulating of him and his supporter doing Nazi “sieg heil” and of a star of David with text inside of it condemning Hilary’s corruption. These examples were used as further evidence of Trumps racism and more specifically his anti-Semitism. Yet Trump’s daughter is an orthodox Jew, his grand children are Jewish, his daughter in-law is Jewish and he supported Benjamin Netanyahu in a campaign add. This makes it hard to believe that he’s some sort of raging anti-Semite or one of the many recent “re-incarnations of Hitler.”
I guess I’m just tired of people pointing an accusatory finger with one hand and taking notes on how to emulate with the other. Can we get back to intelligent reality based reporting that is above fear-mongering, theatrics, and subliminal associations?
He may be talking a lot of fictitious nonsense, but he is right about one thing: You ARE ABSOLUTELY living in a dystopian nightmare. When a need for fear is undeniable it is only strategically sensible for the cause of the real dangers to divert your fear away from them. Why do Americans find that so hard to grasp?
This advert is hilarious and sums up the complete overspend of the US military:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThImmlN-I8s
It should say instead: “To stop them from getting their greasy foreign fingers on your tax dollars, they’d have to prise them from our nuclear-armed death grip. America’s Navy: Robbing you before they do.”
Medea Benjamin is an embarrassment. If she thinks that disrupting Trump’s speech hurts him more than helps him, she’s an idiot.
Shouldn’t she also be at the demoncrat convention,because its the demoncrats who have betrayed America with this obvious terrible choice for POTUS,the most corrupt and dumb candidate in American history?
Trump has absolutely no blood on his hands,his prescription for American recovery is not a martial call to arms,and his policies of conciliation with Russia are light years ahead of every other candidate,and better than any candidate in my memory,as is his whole outlook of America First,instead of zion first,the mantra of all our traitors within,and the HB.
I gather twitter posts and tell people what I think of them and call it journalism!
lulz @ 2 comments so far
Trawling Twitter for opinion is the kind of lazy analysis that occurred before the Brexit vote. It counts for nothing. Read John Harris in the Guardian for proper journalism that involved leaving the computer.
“Robert Mackey writes about national and international news through the prism of social media.”
I managed this “real journalism” without leaving my computer.