When the Federal Trade Commission neared a momentous decision on whether to charge Google with violating antitrust laws in January 2013, the White House was watching closely.
New emails uncovered by the Campaign for Accountability, a public interest watchdog organization, show that a White House advisor met with top Google lobbyist Johanna Shelton and top Google antitrust counsel Matthew Bye twice in the weeks before the FTC announcement.
And minutes prior to the final decision – in which FTC commissioners took the unusual step of overriding their staff’s recommendation to sue, and voted to settle the case instead – the White House official even sought Google’s talking points in the matter.
The FTC is an independent agency within the executive branch. As with the Justice Department, the White House political staff is prohibited from contacting federal regulators who might bring a formal case on behalf of the government. And ever since Richard Nixon stifled the antitrust investigation into ITT, a major donor, White House interference in antitrust cases has been particularly forbidden.
When Donald Trump threatened to bring up Amazon on antitrust charges because he was getting bad press from the Washington Post, owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, it was correctly seen as chilling.
The revelation about the White House’s contacts with Google prior to the FTC decision is another example of the extraordinarily close relationship between Google and the Obama White House. In April, the Campaign for Accountability found — and The Intercept published — evidence from the White House’s own records of frequent meetings between Google staff and Obama administration personnel – over one a week since the beginning of his presidency – and spins through the revolving door between Google and the U.S. government. Nearly 250 people have shuttled from government service to Google employment or vice versa over the course of Obama’s tenure.
This close contact, as well as Google’s partnership with the executive branch on a host of projects, almost inevitably breeds a camaraderie that is at odds with the ability of the government to actually regulate a private company. The West Wing’s coziness with Google officials prior to the antitrust decision speaks to that.
At the time, the FTC was looking into allegations that Google harmed Internet customers and its rivals by prioritizing its own companies and affiliates in search engine results and its placement of online advertising on its search sites. The staff of the Bureau of Competition at the FTC recommended suing after concluding that Google engaged in anticompetitive conduct that “has resulted – and will result – in real harm to consumers and to innovation.”
But in the end, the FTC reached a settlement that forced Google into voluntary changes to its business.
“Johanna, I hear big news coming out momentarily,” wrote White House internet advisor R. David Edelman to Shelton on January 3, 2013, referring to the FTC’s imminent decision. “Do you have the release and any accompanying materials from Google’s side? Obviously, lots of interest here at the WH.”
The FTC announced its decision that day. Within 20 minutes, Shelton responded to Edelman with links to Google’s statement on the closing of the antitrust case, and its “commitment letter” to voluntary changes, as per the FTC’s order. “Please let me know if you have any questions,” Shelton said. A minute later, Edelman replied. “I’m watching the webcast now,” he wrote, presumably referring to the FTC’s announcement of closing the case. “Thanks for the links!”
The newly released emails reveal that the White House was interested in and actively discussing the case before the FTC made their decision, and let the target of the investigation know that. Based on previous open records requests, we also know that meetings between Google executives and White House personnel spiked in the months leading up to the FTC decision.
Edelman met personally with Shelton and Bye twice in the final weeks of the investigation. Between 2012 and 2015, Edelman held at least 18 meetings with Google officials in the White House, per previously released records.
That does not include informal meetings outside the White House at D.C. coffee shops, a technique the White House has been accused of using to get around public records. Edelman’s emails include references to these meetings.
Obama Administration officials have maintained that they did not pressure the FTC in any way to close the investigation into Google. “Our staff is cognizant that it is inappropriate to discuss issues relating to regulatory enforcement,” said spokeswoman Jennifer Friedman in 2015, adding that the FTC “is an independent agency and we respect their independent decision-making.”
Many tech industry rivals claim that Google still biases its search engine results and advertising. The European Union, operating with the same evidence, has filed three antitrust charges against Google over this behavior, the most recent in July.
Interesting to note that like Google in the GWoT, ITT helped the intelligence community during the Vietnam era with cover and wiretapping, i.e. surveillance.
Expect we are going to get tons of these BS articles from Oracle over the next year. They have formed and founded an anti Google organization as a vendetta for losing in court against Google.
There are more dots to connect:
Eric Schmidt, the Chairman of “Alphabet,” which technically owns Google is…
… almost single-handedly funding the data management operation for her highness, Mrs. Clinton. http://qz.com/520652/groundwork-eric-schmidt-startup-working-for-hillary-clinton-campaign/
… a special advisor to the Pentagon. http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/02/technology/eric-schmidt-pentagon/index.html
Obama may be naive and readily fall under the spell of power brokers, but Clinton is ‘one of the gang.’ Wait till she gets her hands on the steering wheel!
“… still claim that Google biases its search results…”
Why is this surprising or a “claim”? Google is a corrupt librarian. That’s not a bug, it’s the entire business model. Give people access to information shaped to help Google’s advertisers.
specialised search engines, coming soon.
OT: In case anyone missed it, or someone is curious… CNN’s “Green Town Hall” yesterday. Green Party candidates Jill Stein and Ajamu Baraka discussing their truly progressive approach to dealing with (among other things) the catastrophic inequality, endemic institutionalized racism and endless war entrenched into the status quo:
Jill Stein Green Party CNN Presidential Town Hall Full Interview 17th August 2016
Jill Stein 2016
This video contains content from Turner CNN, who has blocked it on copyright grounds.
welcome to America
I just have to laugh when people say you’ve got vote for Hillary Clinton because she’s the only chance to continue building on Barack Obama’s legacy.
Obama has certainly been the best president of my voting lifetime (began 1996), but that speaks more to the thoroughly embarrassing cast of characters who’ve taken up residence in the White House.
If the Obama Administration is the best we can do, it’s time flush the whole thing. The alternative can’t be worse. Even if that’s Trump, so be it. At the very least, we’ll get more objective coverage and scrutiny from the mainstream media to go along with our obstructionism and crony capitalism.
yep. CORRUPT CRONY CAPITALIST CRIMINALS
the news of the Hellary Global Crime Initiative gaining traction in thte professional community
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/08/18/google_had_obamas_ear_on_antitrust_probe/
Wouldn’t you rather vote for your grandfather or Mickey Mouse over trump? Seriously, guy has something wrong with him. All you have to watch is him mocking the handicapped reporter. That’s all I needed anyway…. I could care less what he said after then.
Google is just another large corporation in corporate America. They act just as badly as the other large corporations, despite their BS about do no evil. Google is the largest part of the tech crap that’s destroying San Francisco by invading it with damn yuppies who displace the cool people who lived there, as one example of their evil doing.
I’ve been using DuckDuckGo for a search engine ever since Wikileaks notified everyone of Google’s tracking of our web searches. This search engine works just fine and doesn’t track anything you do. As added precautions, I do the following:
1. I use Firefox for a browser
2. I don’t accept 3d party cookies ever
3. I set the browser to delete all cookies when I close the browser
4. I have Ghostery as an extension on Firefox, which blocks all trackers from other websites (if you so choose, you can set it to accept some trackers if you wish).
5. I have Adblock Plus as an extension on Firefox to block internet ads.
6. I use Kaspersky anti-virus and firewall, which is the best protection you can get.
7. I use Superantispyware to block and/or remove spyware.
Despite all this, I assume that the government and large corporations can see everything I do online, so I don’t say things there that might get me into trouble.
Julian Assange reported on Democracy Now! last week or so that Google had/has been to the WH at least once a week since Mr Obama’s presidency.
It seems to me that the Clintons were close with Mr Schmidt and some of the Google gang prior to this admin’s relationship. A relationship for and through the ages. Great, huh?
Mr Assange also reported that Google spends more money on lobbyists than any other corporation.
Too cozy for comfort in so many ways with Google and State, Google and the DoD, Google and the WH.
Google is amassing an army of robots, aren’t they? Wonder why nobody perceives Google as a threat, except some of us.
One interesting thought, which became clear while watching the Shakespeare Theatre’s Mock Trial of 1984, is that even with the SS, the Obamas will have to live under the current cameras-on-every-corner, a militarized police , and Dark State intrusions as the rest of us.
Watch the Mock Trial here: https://www.bisnow.com/washington-dc/news/washington-dc-legal/supreme-court-onstage-61734
Obama Administration officials have maintained that they did not pressure the FTC in any way to close the investigation into Google.
Translation.
“Go ahead and investigate your hearts out. We are not going to bring charges.”
sooner or later, hopefully sooner, Americans will realise that the USG is fundamentally controlled by a network of criminal minds engaged in come criminal operations.
spying, huge drug logistics, privateering of public property and resources, a corrupt state dept, manufacturing and distribution of war materials and wars, support for coups and genocide, wallstreet counterfeiting values and wholesale theft of affordability to precipitate debt, a devastated infrastructure…
and this is the greatest country on the planet? explain.
I think the “greatest country on the planet” moniker is owed to the citizens of America, not “the USG” as you called it. They suck golf balls through hoses.
I think we should go through the constitutional process of a deliberative assembly of state delegations–the Article V Convention: http://www.foavc.org/reference/R44435_20160514.pdf
For many purposes, Google’s search engine results have become such a maze of bright-light billboards, flashing neon and other assorted wankery as to be useless … if not a pain in the ass.
For the most part, I have to go 3-4 hops out to find anything useful nowadays.
*I do recall, vaguely, way back when, wondering how in the world the good folks @ google were going to make a living providing me with relevant, accurate and, essentially, unlimited ‘free information’. .. Now I know.
The more words you put in the search box, the more likely you are to get useful results – but then you have to click on the “verbatim” button to avoid their AI trying to second-guess you. Get at least 100 results, too. For example I made this search up, rather randomly:
antitrust Russia settlement fine policy president future
Well down the list I found this gem, in the European edition of Politico:
http://www.politico.eu/article/google-confronts-microsofts-legacy/
It just takes more time and effort to avoid being led around like a water buffalo with a ring in its nose. Reminds me of what an Intercept article some time ago said about Facebook: “You train the algorithm, and the algorithm trains you.”
Orwell would have laughed at that quote, I think.
Agree with you 100% photosymbiosis re. how you have to manipulate the Google to work for you…there is a hell of a lot of useful, informative, educational, “exposing” etc. information available on the web if you know how to “search it” well..at least for the time being..
…here”s a pretty bizarre article I just read:
https://www.rt.com/viral/356415-cern-shiva-sacrifice-video/
” Officials are currently searching for people standing behind the incident what has been called by CERN spokeswoman a prank.”
” “CERN doesn’t forgive this kind of parodies that go against the center’s professional principles and the investigation is currently underway,” the press-service added. ”
” “CERN welcomes every year thousands of scientific users from all over the world and sometimes some of them let their humor go too far. This is what happened on this occasion,” the CERN official said.”
….some disturbing stuff…So they’re searching for these people, investigation is underway, yet the spokesperson is saying “Oh, it’s all some silly joke, you know those zany science geeks!” paraphrasing by me..
Probably just some kind of ??? – a play on the whole Oppenheimer response to the Trinity nuclear test, “Now I am become Shiva, Destroyer of Worlds” line – although it is kind of weird that CERN would have statue of Shiva in their facility, isn’t it? It’s kind of a sick joke about nuclear weapons, in many ways – Edward Teller / Dr. Strangelove mentality.
But Google is useful, search [ “nuclear weapons” “nuclear energy” CERN ] and you find that CERN scientists are a mixed bunch – some nuclear weapons apologists, some rabid nuclear energy advocates, and some who point out (correctly) that nuclear energy is expensive, dangerous, and has a long-term supply issue and so should be phased out; only the last are worth linking to:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969713004579
And this emphasizes the point – even though CERN is publicly funded (which is where the author works), the publisher of that article wants $42 to look at the full document – so much for the open exchange of information.
Pvt. Not Sure, your link doesn’t work.
Such tantalizing sentences and I’ve no idea what the prank is.
Thank you.
Here’s a radical notion to chew on: What if the entire business model of the Internet is suspect and contradicts the original intent of the Internet?
This ban was lifted in 1991; Phil Zimmerman created PGP (encryption for the public) in 1991; SSL encryption (needed for business transactions) began in 1994; domain name registration fees were implemented in 1995. This marked the transition from a open information-sharing model to what we have now – ads, ads, ads.
Furthermore, much of the most important and useful information – research article databases covering scientific discoveries since World War II, for example – remains hidden behind paywalls, despite the fact that almost all that research was publicly financed by taxpayer money. News article archives are not really available without something like a Lexis-Nexis subscription – at about $450 per user per month, the institutional flat rate. So much for the “information revolution” – but gosh, what a lot of porn and targeted advertising based on user data mining.
And the hype about the Internet business model and its revolutionary nature is just that, hype. The brilliant economist Ha-Joon Chang stated this well – the washing machine has had a greater impact on most people’s lives than the Internet has:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/aug/29/my-bright-idea-ha-joon-chang
Likewise, the invention of the printing press and the fax machine and the photocopier were far more fundamental to the information revolution than the Internet was; the Internet just makes it easier to access existing information – but even this is now at risk, because ultimately, tech companies (Google, Facebook, Apple, etc.) and cable companies (Verizon, Comcast, ATT, etc.) and state surveillance (NSA, GCHQ, 3PLA, FAPSI, etc.) could turn the Internet into something like Orwellian cable TV – tightly controlled, endlessly monitored, pay-to-access everything.
The way to oppose this is to not use the internet for business; pretend it’s still 1991, never buy anything online, don’t bank online, don’t buy online apps – none of it. And as far as copyright? If you don’t want your photos and text shared, don’t place them online. Sure, if someone else does, well, there should be some legal remedy – authors and artists deserve to be paid for their work, but copyrights should not extend forever.
Regardless, I really don’t have any sympathy for those who took what was intended to be a means of information exchange and tried to turn it into a cash cow; that’s why I only use the Internet as it was originally intended. Of course, if you want to support a specific web site, there’s a means to do that: donations, just as with other groups you might like – Greenpeace, Union of Concerned Scientists, Electronic Frontier Foundation, etc. – but not via PayPal (sorry), send a check or use bank wire transfers.
P.S. Isn’t thoughtcrime fun?
Clear concise facts, appreciated.
Dedicated to the memory of Aaron Swartz – and MIT, like the UC, is run by scumbags.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/11/aaron-swartz-death-first-anniversary
You continue to be my favourite commenter here. Nate would probably say that is because I agree with a lot of what you say, and I do (no argument there), but I agree with you most of the time because you seem logical, rational, well-read and compassionate. You clearly care about injustice. The world needs more people like you in it.
Aaron got shafted. That said I think MIT was taken for a bit of a ride (I have noticed federal law enforcement tends to run with things when it wants someone, even when the parties involved do not wish to bring charges (and by then it is usually too late).
That said, what do you think the chances for the Article V Convention?
http://www.foavc.org/reference/R44435_20160514.pdf
I think that when I see link to a PDF file from an obscure low-traffic website like foavc I wonder if it’s a malicious spear phishing attempt, particularly when reposted multiple times. . .
https://blog.knowbe4.com/scam-of-the-week-secure-document-phishing-attacks-trap-employees
Never open email attachments; only download pdf files from trusted sites. Not that this is going to prevent someone like the NSA from breaking into trusted sites, but it avoids the more garden-variety scams.
i am fearless or foolish, or a combination thereof
pdf’s in email? uh uh
from an unknown site? 2 things. One, take proper precautions. Two, msm is not going to serve stuff that really matters.
coming soon, specialised search enging.
Wait, are you asking people not to use the Internet? While on the Internet….
What I find chilling is that even America’s most prestigious and successful media organizations have lost their independence. They have become subsidiaries of larger corporations.
We’re in a lot of trouble.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFvT_qEZJf8
Amusingly, Russia is being more diligent about enforcing antitrust laws than the United States is:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/Russia-and-Google-fail-to-reach-to-a-settlement/articleshow/53726735.cms
More reasons for Obama to be angry with Putin? Or maybe this is one of the main reasons? I don’t even know if the POTUS has a seat on the Central Committee these days; maybe it’s all CEOs, Chairmen and billionaires, and the POTUS is just their #1 lackey. Hop to it, Obama – Chop chop, double quick time!
Don’t govt officials have to wait a year before going to work for entities that they regulate? It is in the civil service regs.
Those rules apply to career civil servants, not to the political appointees. And there are other loopholes. For instance, I don’t think that there is any prohibition on people who are not in a position to decide on awarding contracts. So, for example, lots of senior military officers retire to work for the very same war industry contractors whose contracts they were monitoring while at the Pentagon or in one of the systems commands. And so it won’t appear that I’m picking on the military, I am sure it happens in other departments as well.
Assange wrote about Google’s “cozy relationship” with the government, specifically with Clinton, a few years ago: https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
Exactly. This is likely ongoing, not something isolated to Obama and Nixon. Nothing happened when wikileaks reported it and this article will be quickly forgotten also. And it will keep happening over and over until something sparks mass anger.
This topic isn’t likely that spark but it was good journalism IMHO.
I guess this explains their saying they have other jokes. I am so tired of the world. Google seems to be able to make things up as it sees fit.
Good article; I bet that Google was also the model for the NSA’s Utah Data Repository, which is where everything the NSA vacuums up domestically and internationally is stored, in a data center that was probably copied from Google’s server farms – except instead of just public web pages, the NSA server includes private text messages, transcribed phone calls, user’s search history (which Google seems to store as well, and not just in cookies on your computer which you can delete by clearing the browser), medical records, credit card purchases, videos and photos, etc. etc. That’s what the PRISM program accesses; and then you’ve got the private sector version of PRISM, Peter Thiel’s Palantir. Well, it’s just a search tool – the data it gets to search is the bigger issue.
Makes one wonder if Google’s claims about not knowing about the NSA’s backdoor into their servers is honest or not:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/10107912/Google-denies-giving-spies-access-to-its-servers.html
What’s also problematic about Google is that they might be deliberately excluding problematic web pages from their search results on behalf of clients like Edelman PR, etc., in order to keep embarrassing information that hurts their client’s interests from public view. In addition, the Google News Archive is very, very skimpy these days – they seem to be moving more and more to the paywall model for information access.
I bet, you know, that in some corporate-government back room somewhere, there’s a well-developed plan for turning the American internet into the Chinese internet, another pre-written-Patriot Act-in-waiting – that would be completely unsurprising. Just waiting for the right moment to push it through Congress – as the Patriot Act was pushed through, signed by Bush on Oct 26 2001, a little more than a week after the Senate anthrax attacks of Oct 9, 2001 splashed all over the media front pages, around Oct 16, 2001.
I have the same suspicion.
Sometimes these federal agencies get a bit carried away and decide they have the authority to take action under their legal mandate. In these cases, the executive branch must gently remind them that there are political considerations which override such legislated authority.
The same thing is often seen with inexperienced workers who follow their written job description, rather than doing what the boss tells them. People must understand that things are put in writing to make someone look good, but there is no connection, or at least no logical connection, to the way that things are done in practice.
Google has made sure the right people are kept happy, so written legislation doesn’t apply to them.
The phenomenon you describe has been clearly described as “Normalized Deviance” in the seminal book “The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA” The economic policy and official conduct regarding this and all aspects of the US government, especially foreign policy operate within the perimeters described in the book.
Essentially it is institutionalized but informal corruption which has seeped incrementally into operational norms.
Your comment is hilarious as usual. I really enjoy reading your comments, they are the only entertaining aspect of this website (not saying that The Intercept is supposed to be entertaining, but a little humor is always good).
You should consider writing for a living if you already don’t. Your witty sarcasm is not only very funny, it’s also very informative in a deeper way than just conveying facts (as long as the reader understands what you mean and doesn’t take you literally).
It would be difficult to cite a better example of Obama’s hypocrisy than this. On one hand, he pushes for the TTP and TTIP, in which the copyrights of large media firms like Disney will be extended and strengthened, and on the other he runs interference for Google, one of the world’s biggest violators of individual copyrights. Any Google search involving images is almost certain to produce images which Google has appropriated from the copyright owners without their permission. I know this because they have stolen images from my web site, even though a copyright notice appears on each and every page, and each image has a digital copyright embedded in it. When I used their contact form to complain, I of course never got an answer.
Google’s policy of copyright infringement extends also to the written word. They now have a feature where a text box appears in response to certain queries. The contents of the text boxes are again lifted verbatim from individual web sites, without regard to the rights of the owners.
Why does that matter, you ask? In the case of my images, they have employed technology that defeats the copy protection built into my web site. In the general case, being able to obtain content direct from Google discourages people from visiting the web sites, potentially depriving them of revenue.
And, by the way, as anyone outside the White House can see, whenever you do a Google search, their preferred advertisers’ links always appear at the head of the list. So much for their promises.
I hope the EU puts the screws to them.
24b4Jeff… very important points… especially the redirect / coopting of content and thereby discouraging of visits to source sites, and depriving sources of vital income. Photographers and writers are uncompensated grist for their pirate ship/ cyber mill
Jeff…I am deeply suspicious of relying on metadata with my images to protect them… and is why I impose a visible copyright mark in the image field.
Complain? The only complaining you should be doing is filing of a summons and complaint in court. Contact a top notch copyright lawyer, I believe the best one is in Milwaukee. And better yet, a class action suit would cost Google a bunch of money and stop this theft for good.
Cory Doctorow, one of the founders of EFF wrote a rollicking, fun book called, “Content.” I’m reading it now. I have gotten the best education, so far, on the ills of patent protection and the overuse of copyright infringement. $150,000 for every online infringement violation, if I remember correctly.
And in this decade, there is no good reason for using Google search, as far as I know.
For the past few years, I get by using DuckDuckGo, Privatelee, and Ixquick or StartPage. On the rare occasion when I hop over to Google, I don’t seem to get any better information. When I need Win10 help, it’s unfortunate that I really need Bing.
A recent book said that 90% of the information online is on the Dark Net, anyway. No wonder I’m always the only one searching for a particular answer.