The United States is spending more money on more missions to send more elite U.S. forces to train alongside more foreign counterparts in more countries around the world, according to documents obtained by The Intercept via the Freedom of Information Act.
Under the Joint Combined Exchange Training program, which is designed to train America’s special operators in a variety of missions — from “foreign internal defense” to “unconventional warfare” — U.S. troops carried out approximately one mission every two days in 2014, the latest year covered by the recently released documents.
At a price tag of more than $56 million, the U.S. sent its most elite operators — Navy SEALs, Army Green Berets, and others — on 176 individual JCETs, a 13 percent increase from 2013. The number of countries involved jumped even further, from 63 to 87, a 38 percent spike.
The JCET program is a key facet of a global strategy involving America’s most secretive and least scrutinized troops. Since 9/11, special operations forces (SOF) have expanded in almost every conceivable way — from budget to personnel to overseas missions. On any given day, 10,000 special operators are deployed or “forward stationed,” conducting missions that vary “from behind-the-scenes information-gathering and partner-building to high-end dynamic strike operations,” then-chief of U.S. Special Operations Command, Gen. Joseph Votel, told the Senate Armed Services Committee earlier this year.
In 2014, more than 4,800 elite troops took part in JCETs, compared to just over 3,800 the year before. “The purpose of JCETs is to foster the training of U.S. SOF in mission-critical skills by training with partner-nation forces in their home countries,” Ken McGraw, a spokesperson for U.S. Special Operations Command, told The Intercept. “JCETs allow U.S. SOF to use and further develop their language skills and cultural knowledge plus hone their skills training indigenous forces.”
Gen. Raymond A. Thomas III, who is Votel’s successor as head of SOCOM, told the Senate Armed Services Committee in March that “working with our international partners allows us to share the burden more appropriately. We must engage, not only where problems occur, but also in places critical to our vital national interests where no visible threat currently exists.”
The recently released documents note that, in addition to the training opportunities afforded to elite U.S. troops, the JCET program also provides “incidental benefits,” namely building military-to-military contacts, improving interoperability with foreign forces, and “gaining regional access with a minimal footprint.” The files further refer to JCETs as “low signature” missions.
A 2015 investigation by The Intercept revealed JCETs were regularly conducted with foreign militaries implicated by the U.S. State Department in gross human rights violations. And a more recent effort by The Intercept and 100Reporters found JCETs formed one facet of a global training network typified by a lack of coherent strategy and effective oversight.
A 2013 Rand Corp. study of JCETs conducted in areas covered by Africa Command, Pacific Command, and Southern Command found “moderately low” effectiveness of the missions in all three regions. Asked for comment on the findings, McGraw of SOCOM had little to say. “I have not and do not have the time to review the Rand study,” he told The Intercept, noting that he was aware of no one at the command who had read Rand’s analysis. “We are not going to comment on the study.”
Top photo: Chile and U.S. Special Forces wait for a U.S. Army helicopter to evacuate two simulated hostages during a training rescue operation in Antofagasta, Chile, on July 22, 2016, as part of exercise Southern Star.
Post dox plz
I don’t think it matters if Trump or Clinton wins the election here, Nick, as I doubt it’ll stop plans to make the African continent – New America. And relative to that I can’t help being reminded of a joke watermelon-smashing Gallagher told 30 years ago about American imperialism / racism: “I think we should let Texas secede from the union so they can attack Cuba, because Texans would come ashore and claim the island was empty except for the help.”
Sep 9, 2016 US-funded Ukrainian army is terrorizing civilians, 2016
Russell Bentley is a former US marine, that now fights for the Donbass, Eastern Ukraine, against the US-funded Ukrainian army.
https://youtu.be/-FoLyahe7oE
Could we just stop calling especially-effective killers (often killers of the innocent) “elite?”
Every time you type that adjective, you inadvertently lend credibility to the war machine and its cogs.
Just like the 1% are referred to as elite?
Just like the 1% are referred to as the elite?
Se the thing is we like individualism over families, over communities so it’s just an extension if that in my opinion to call the superlative people in their own right elite.
Hence the elite of the capitalists who are greedy but still they are the best at capitalism.
Elite ate killing but hey they are the elite and they are protecting freedom!
“Most secretive but least scrutinized…”?! Secretive? Sometimes. Scrutinized? More than you realize or chose to recognize. Instead if relying on one weak RAND study for your entire loose argument, diversify your research. The level of scrutiny on SOF is higher than other forces, which is why SOF requires it’s own legislative office in DC. Programs like JCETs are conducted at the request of the foreign partner, approved through DoS and only done with units that pass extensive HR vetting. This argument (which is the third version you have published in a week) is sloppy, irresponsible and based on weak evidence.
Sounds like 1960 Viet Nam. Not sending any troops just advisors.
Surely this deserves another Peace Prize.
Yes, but were these spec ops dudes also vetted by Hillary and the State Department???
https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2016/09/06/new-isis-military-commander-was-trained-by-state-department-as-recently-as-2014/
The brutal/socio-pathic massacres committed by US Special Operations forces around the world (ex. https://theintercept.com/2016/06/01/pentagon-special-ops-killing-of-pregnant-afghan-women-was-appropriate-use-of-force/ ) are bound to inflict massive suffering on people abroad at the same time as they increase hostilities to the US people.
Meanwhile, the DOD, in it’s absurd “accounting” of where $TRILLIONS goes, simply makes it up and LOL while raising it’s middle finger to the taxpayers and Congress, who trembles at the thought of confronting the DOD as they might be criticized as “making Amerika weak” .
What happened the last time trillions of dollars went missing from the DoD??
quote:”And a more recent effort by The Intercept and 100Reporters found JCETs formed one facet of a global training network typified by a lack of coherent strategy and effective oversight.”unquote
Oversight.
BWHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…., HOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHO… HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE… HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA… HAHAHAHA.. HAHAHA.. HAHA..
oversight. Hahahaha.. that’s the funniest thing I’ve read in a year.
Cuba does pretty much the same thing, except what they have is an elite corps of doctors and nurses that they send all over the world. Why exactly can’t we be more like Cuba again? Surely it’s not the civil liberties or the due process…
I believe that the reason the government released this material is because they do not see it as any threat what-so-ever to their power. So what if “we” know this? What can “we” do about it? NOTHING And even if “we” could it is unlikely “we” would. No one understands this better than the Empire of the Exceptionals.
Howard Zinn
“Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of leaders…and millions have been killed because of this obedience…Our problem is that people are obedient allover the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves… (and) the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.”
This is what Hitler did with constantly increasing SS army units under his direct command. Only a small step to SpecOps on the streets in USA.
For missions you mean, on US soil against its own citizens? I’ll wager we’d already find ourselves surprised. But knowing about that happening and being able to prove it are quite different things.
Because of both Nick’s and Jeremy Scahill’s reporting it’s not difficult to believe more clandestine operations now exist within JSOC or SOCOM or any theater command, where special forces are ordered on missions there’s never a record of and nobody ever talks about, no different than the CIA.
……and what a budget.
They used to have a forward operating elite force called the Peace Corps for that sort of thing.
Jeez, wait till Psycho Bill’s psychopath wife gets into power. Hell hath No Fury like a Woman embarrassed in front of the Entire World by a Philandering Serial Rapist Phony, who Thinks She Should Rule the World because She Damn Well Deserves It after all the HUMILIATION, okay? And DEATH & WAR to ALL NAYSAYERS.
Nothing like “accidentally” creating the need for future military interventions in far flung places. Perhaps looked at a different way the reason they don’t track success rates, and might not care too much about resulting gross human right violations, is they’re counting on them. Like drones hovering over populations and terrorizing them before “accidentally” killing grandmothers and babies – the result will almost certainly be more armed enemies of the United States.
In the words of Dana Carvey’s Church Lady, “How convenient.”
The bland corporation wants to streamline these authorities and setup an amazonian global network of small arms (under $100,000 USD) fulfillment centers
While program managers implement programs, the basis behind them
is the collection of legislative authorities to conduct BPC activities. As
already stated, the database includes 184 separate legislative authorities
that power the 165 BPC programs managed across various organizations
within the U.S. government. The majority of legislative authorities
for BPC are contained in the U.S. Code, with 71 residing in Title
10, Armed Forces, and 39 contained in Title 22, Foreign Relations and
Intercourse
24 Security Cooperation Mechanisms Combatant Commands Utilize
6 Of the remaining 74 authorities, 63 have not been incorporated
into the U.S. Code and reside separately in a variety of public
laws. Most of these public laws are budget authorization and appropriation
bills, such as annual National Defense Authorization Acts, supplemental
spending bills, contingency-specific spending bills, and appropriation
bills related to non-DoD activities. The remaining authorities
are derived from executive orders and other portions of the U.S. Code,
including Title 6, Domestic Security, Title 32, National Guard, Title
42, The Public Health and Welfare, and Title 50, War and National
Defense.7
BPC programs typically leverage more than one authority to
carry out their activities. Programs that rely on just a single authority
are in the minority; 89 of the programs draw on two or more
authorities, while 76 use only one. Interestingly, of these 76 single authority
programs, 54 draw on Title 10, leaning heavily on Section
168, Military-To-Military Contacts and Comparable Activities. Section
168, a workhorse of DoD BPC, directly enables 21 of these programs
by authorizing the activities and expenses of traveling contact teams,
military liaison teams, exchanges of civilian or military personnel, as
well as seminars and conferences. All told, Section 168 of Title 10
is associated with nearly half of all DoD BPC programs. Key provisions
of Section 168 are that Congress must authorize appropriated
funds and that the Secretary of Defense controls disbursement of those
funds.8 Other Title 10 authorities are similarly used broadly to enable
BPC activities.
Section 1051, Multilateral, Bilateral, or Regional Cooperation Programs:
Payment of Personnel Expenses,9 is similar in nature to Section
168 and enables DoD to engage with foreign military personnel by
authorizing the payment of guest relations officers and other expenses associated with foreign intercourse relations.
More secret warriors, more secret wars, how can we bring this under the US Constitution or even as citizens judge where and what we are engaged in? When special operation become general warfare it should be declared by congress. I understand secrecy in real time operations but more detail on what we are doing and why as a Nation should be public. We and our elected representatives should judge and be judged for our judgement.
How else to stir up ‘terrorist’ insurgencies for our much-needed endless wars?