The last Guantánamo detainee to make the case for his release before a panel of senior administration officials is also the youngest man left at the island prison.
In a hearing Thursday of Guantánamo’s Periodic Review Board, Hassan Ali Bin Attash, a Yemeni who is believed to be about 31 years old, said through representatives that he was working toward a high school GED diploma and hoped to join relatives in Saudi Arabia and find a job as a translator.
Attash’s exact birthdate is uncertain, but he was certainly a young teen in 1997, when the U.S. military alleges that he pledged allegiance to Osama bin Laden and began working for senior al Qaeda figures doing everything from bomb-making to logistics. He was captured in Pakistan in 2002 and spent the next two years being moved between CIA black-site prisons and interrogations in Afghanistan and Jordan before landing in Guantánamo in September 2004. While in U.S. custody, according to his own and other prisoners’ accounts, he was subjected to sleep deprivation, hung from a bar by his wrists, and threatened with dogs and electric shocks, among other forms of torture. He was also severely tortured by the Jordanians.
The military assessment filed for the board states that in Saudi Arabia, Attash could easily reconnect with terrorist actors, and that his family is also suspect. Attash’s older brother Walid bin Attash is one of the five men being tried before the Guantánamo military commission for the 9/11 attacks.
His lawyer, David Remes, countered that allegation, saying that he has never heard the younger Attash express anti-American or extremist views.
“Now a young man, with a mind of his own, he is no longer under the sway of others and can make independent decisions,” Remes told the board.
As with all hearings before the Periodic Review Board — a sort of parole process for Guantánamo detainees — the proceedings were piped by video from Cuba to media and other observers in a room at the Pentagon. Attash, who has previously been seen in photos in an orange jumpsuit with wild hair, appeared as a neatly groomed young man. Detainees are not allowed to speak during the open portion of the hearing.
Attash’s hearing marks the end of a three-year process in which the Obama administration has reconsidered the cases of many of the last men left at Guantánamo, with the aim of closing the prison before the president leaves office. As of today, all of the detainees who were eligible for a Periodic Review Board hearing have had one.
The final hearing provides an opportunity to look at the 61 men left in Guantánamo and what the administration proposes to do with them.
Twenty men are now approved for transfer to another country. Seven are currently facing charges at the military commissions, Guantánamo’s war court (this includes the five accused of plotting the 9/11 attacks). One remaining detainee has already been convicted by the war court, and two others pleaded guilty. Another 12, including Hassan Attash, have had their hearing but are still awaiting the board’s decision.Nineteen fall into the intractable category of prisoners who have not been referred for prosecution, but whom officials believe they cannot safely release. The board recommended these men for “continued detention under the law of war” — in other words, slating them for indefinite detention.
“In the next few months, it will be interesting to see whether the administration uses all of its powers to release the many men left who are not yet cleared but who it has no intention of charging,” said Shayana Kadidal, senior managing attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights, which represents many detainees. “That will show whether the president is genuinely committed to closing the prison or just intends to leave his own unfinished promises for the next president to resolve.”
The administration’s effort to classify detainees has evolved over the years. After Obama’s year-one promise to close Guantánamo, he convened a task force to evaluate the cases of all the detainees there, recommending them for prosecution, continued detention, or transfer to another country.
Obama also established the Periodic Review Boards (known in Gitmo lingo as PRBs) to regularly evaluate the situation of each detainee the task force had recommended for detention or trial, in order to determine whether they still pose a threat to the United States or if they could be safely released. The board includes representatives from the departments of Defense, State, Homeland Security, and Justice, as well as the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Director of National Intelligence. They don’t take up the legality of holding the prisoner. Instead, they consider the intelligence against the detainee, and whether it still holds up, as well as the detainee’s behavior and activities. They also consider what life after Guantánamo would look like — family and other support networks, job prospects, and the stability of their home country.
As such, the review boards offer a rare glimpse into life at the prison, with detainees often submitting personal details, reports from vocational or language classes, or even paintings. Remes, Attash’s lawyer, said that “when the prison still made such publications as the Washington Post and New York Times available to detainees, Hassan devoured them.” (A Guantánamo public affairs officer would not comment on whether those newspapers were allowed but said that the “intellectual stimulation program” for detainees “includes books, magazines and puzzles, newspapers, handheld electronic games, movies and satellite television.”)
The administration has been criticized for the slow start to the PRB process; the first hearing didn’t happen until 2013. This year, as the prison’s population dipped below 100 for the first time, the pace of the PRBs sped up.
When someone is cleared for transfer, the administration has to find a place to resettle him, which is particularly tricky when his home country isn’t an option (many of the remaining men are from Yemen, which is currently embroiled in a devastating war).
The prisoners slated for indefinite detention present a bigger conundrum. Each prisoner may have his PRB file reviewed every six months, and after three years (if the regime at Guantánamo continues) he’d be eligible for another hearing. One detainee is already scheduled for his second PRB hearing in October.
The Pentagon says that whatever the decision of the PRB, the administration can continue to evaluate “individualized disposition” options, including transfer, prosecution in the military commissions or by another country, or, should Congress lift the current ban on bringing Guantánamo inmates to the United States, imprisoning them or trying them domestically (recent court decisions have limited the types of charges the military tribunals can bring).
In other cases, the detainees are unlikely to be tried because the evidence against them is tainted by torture (already an issue in other military commissions proceedings) or because there simply isn’t much evidence against them at all, said Kadidal, of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “Most of these men are in fact not people who are worthy of prosecution,” he said.
If the U.S. government continues to assert that it can hold them under the law of war, Kadidal said, “we can expect continued challenges” in federal court questioning whether the conflicts justifying the detentions are really still taking place.
“If not, continued detention is illegal,” he said.
Top Photo: A U.S. Army Military Police checks in on a detainee during morning prayer at Camp V in the U.S. military prison at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba on June 26, 2013.
So Attash was supposed to be a young teen skilled at bomb-making? Is that anything like the American schoolboy who was arrested because of his “bomb,” the one everybody actually knew was a clock?
This is so wrong!! Send these men home to their families! You have NO PROFF THEY COMMITED ANY WRONG!!!!
According to Time at the time (2003), Hambali was THE person who paid for all of Al Qaida’s terror attacks in SE Asia, even those that did not affiliate with Al Qaida like the Balibombing attacks in 2002. See: http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,493256,00.html
I wonder why Hambali’s release from Gitmo is now ‘pending’ (see enclisis figure in the article). If Hambali is not what he is supposed to be, then what to make of the Balibombings and the accussation that it was, in the end, Bin Laden who was the mastermind behind this terrorist attack, according to a leaked memo of the CIA. See: http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/article216396.ece
For those able to read Dutch, see: for more on this: http://degrijzeduif.blogspot.nl/2015/12/over-terrorisme.html?m=1
Easy Peasy it’s what, 10 countries. I bet there are black sites in every one of those nations. If Obama really wanted to close Gitmo he would reverse rendition them. WE can bomb civilians incessantly with drone but we can’t leave a bunch of guys on the tarmac somewhere? Mindboggling.
You people are ifiots. If you have read any history about the origin of the National Anthem Frances Scott Key ( the author) was in the harbor at the ending of the revolutionar war negotiating the fealese of American Revolutionary soldier both white and black when Britian said they were bombing the flag at the fort until it fell. Hunndreds of hits ditectly hit our flag yet the valiant men and women and children in the fort kept the flag upright at great loss but never let it hit the ground. One after another person taking up turns holding the pole and each other all night. Key could see the flag when the bombs blasted and made light in the darkness. As the dawn arose our flag was still standing. And our militia was released. How dare you make such statements without knowing the facts behind your story.
Thank you both for keeping us updated on what seems ongoing war crimes at Guantanamo.
I remember first reading Shayana Kadidal at HuffingtonPost some 8 or 9 years ago writing about Guantanamo prisoners, the Center’s fights for habeas corpus – and against the Military Commissions Act. Maybe he no longer has the time but then again you never know, if TI asked him to write something, at his leisure of course, he might not say no.
Yes, Thank you. This needs to be kept alive as do investigations of torture.
Guantanamo has to be kept open since we are planning to send Director James Comey and Director James Clapper there for their early and compulsory retirement. Hillary and Loretta Lynch will join them soon after we make it more female friendly.
In one word F R A U D…. Do you believe in TRUTH – JUSTICE – The AMERICAN WAY……..LIES got us into the WAR because truth got in the way
JUSTICE delayed is justice denied – so after a decade what do you call it….
The American WAY was honorable because WE believed in TRUTH & JUSTICE…
I have a wonderful idea! Since so many of you have so much sympathy for these poor, innocent persecuted souls, lets turn the property next door to you into a “Gitmo refugee” resettlement home. Then we can give them an EBT card with food stamps and cash on it, medical insurance, because they need constant medical care for life due to all those hunger strikes, and of course disability benefits for life because they are far too mentally damaged from all that torture to ever be expected to work! Obviously, we then must pay for their extended family to come here, since they could never be expected to integrate into our society, we’ll just bring their society here! And when they are posting their plans to blow up the local movie theater on facebook, DHS says we certainly can’t use that information to investigate them, that would violate their civil rights gosh darn it, and that would be UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!!!
It’s ironic because if he were still in Yemen at the start of Obama’s presidency, they probably would have just sought to assassinate him by airstrike. Or died in the recent US-funded violence.
“OK, Mr Attash, this is your Open Hearing.”
“Be quiet, you’re not allowed to speak at your Open Hearing.”
This is so far beyond irony, its in the next universe.
I see that they’ve already convicted one prisoner, in a mere 12 years. This should silence all talk about slow moving government bureaucracies. Hopefully, they get their second conviction even faster.
“Hopefully, they get their second conviction even faster.”
You know, experience always leads to efficiencies. ;)
you know lawyers?
If they can make a career of one case, done.
I do know lawyers. An incompetent one can delay a trial for months or even years. A competent one can delay it much longer.
The real torture I find is forcing them to read New York Times and Washington Post. That would certainly drive me crazy in a week, and they have been enduring this for close to fifteen years. I think it is certainly very dangerous to release them now among sane people.
Maybe Crook’d can use them for her campaign instead of relying on just the father of the Orlando killer.
We should demand a new classification for some of these detainees. It would be call the “Oh, we screwed up and now we don’t know what to do with this guy” classification. Or maybe the “If we let him go, he will tell what happened to him and it won’t be kind to American policy makers” classification. Kind of a truth-in-labeling thing….
Growing up during the Cold War we called nations that operated gulags, electronic “iron curtains” and a Stasi – “Evil Doers”.
So of course we rejected James Madison model of government and embraced Erik Honaker’s communist model after 9/11.
We copied the communists, does anyone care?
Most definitely, I care. The US crossed a threshold when it gave up on even the pretense of honoring international treaties, let alone the Constitution. If they(TPTB) were on such firm legal and moral ground, they would have been shouting from the rooftops. This lawlessness is not a new phenomenom, i.e. Manifest Destiny, Indian Removal Act, to name just two. What might be new however is the brazenness with which they now break the law claiming extraordinary circumstances, which is when the law is tested. We have miserably failed the test(s), and I am ashamed at what has and is being done in my name. Speak out. Friends, family, acquaintances, neighbors, and strangers can’t know what your opinion is if you keep silent.
This article fails to tell me how many cages are open and available?
0Bama, Hellary, Bill, W, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Brennen, et al should be filling the spaces!
Either we are an equal opportunity enforcer, or the USA is just a sham.
Isn’t indefinite detention illegal to begin with? It violates human rights! Oh, that’s right, this is the USA, where torture is illegal but establishment perpetrators just have to write a report and say ‘sorry-not-sorry’ and it goes away in a pixie-dust haze of propaganda (only to resurface as Gitmo force-feeding; and because of no convictions for torture, it’s now merely a policy option of the Executive). “Indefinite detention is illegal in the US unless it isn’t” is probably in some secret memo-law somewhere.