A story published this week by the Daily Beast about the nine months Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine spent working as a volunteer in a Jesuit community in Honduras in 1980 and 1981 has been making the conservative rounds. The Beast’s tabloid headline is a cheap exercise in red-baiting: “Tim Kaine’s Time with a Marxist Priest.”
That priest, Fr. James Carney, was indeed a revolutionary and, as a practitioner of liberation theology in Latin America during a period marked by populist movements fighting against death squads and murderous regimes backed by the U.S., an avid student of Marxist theory.
After years spent among the poor and oppressed in Latin America, Carney renounced his U.S. citizenship and joined the armed guerrilla struggle against U.S.-backed death squads and governments. He also left the Jesuits because, he explained, the order would not condone his involvement in an armed struggle. Whatever one thinks of that decision, Carney sacrificed his privilege and status to join the people he was ministering to as a priest. In the eyes of the Reagan administration, that made him a terrorist. In the eyes of the peasants and revolutionaries Carney joined in struggle, he was a hero. (For a look at the roots of Jesuits joining indigenous struggle in Latin America, check out the film “The Mission.”)
The scandal that the Beast claims “may cause trouble” for Kaine is that he once met Fr. Carney, 35 years ago. The right-wing group Catholic Vote has done its best Joe McCarthy imitation on the issue. “That Kaine made the effort to seek out and spend time with Carney is troubling,” according to a memo published by the group with the headline “Tim Kaine’s Radical Roots in Honduras.” It claimed that “the Soviets created liberation theology to undermine the Church and advance the Soviet cause against the United States. In Honduras, the phony Marxist-tinged theology was planted to manipulate poor Catholics, instigate terrorism, and stir up a violent revolution in Honduras — then the key ally of the United States opposing Communism in the region.”
“There’s some serious questions here,” Catholic Vote’s spokesperson told the Beast, speaking about the one meeting Kaine had with Carney 35 years ago. “What was your relationship to this guy when you were down there? What did he teach you?”
What is entirely absent from Catholic Vote’s “history” is the context of what was happening in Latin America during the 1980s — particularly to Catholics. Archbishop Oscar Romero of El Salvador was assassinated by graduates of the U.S. Army School of the Americas as he performed mass. Catholic nuns and laywomen, including four from the U.S., were raped and murdered. Jesuit priests were executed by death squads. The U.S.-backed Honduran army’s secret police unit, Battalion 316, committed systematic massacres — all while John Negroponte was the U.S. ambassador to Honduras. Negroponte was very close to 316’s commander, Gen. Gustavo Álvarez Martínez, and met with him frequently.
Declassified cables from Negroponte’s time in Honduras reveal no evidence Negroponte ever expressed even a mild objection to Battalion 316’s systematic murders and human rights abuses. According to the National Security Archives: “The Honduran human rights ombudsman later found that more than 50 people disappeared at the hands of the military during those years. But Negroponte’s cables reflect no protest, or even discussion of these issues during his many meetings with Gen. Álvarez, his deputies and Honduran President Robert Suazo. Nor do the released cables contain any reporting to Washington on the human rights abuses that were taking place.”
And what became of Father Carney?
He was thrown from a helicopter in 1983. A whistleblower who deserted Battalion 316 reported that Carney “was executed by order of the battalion’s commander, Gen. Gustavo Álvarez Martínez, who along with several other members of 316 had received training in counterintelligence from U.S. forces at the School of the Americas.” The deserter also asserted that “Álvarez Martínez gave the order for Carney’s execution in the presence of a CIA officer, known as ‘Mister Mike.’” The Los Angeles Times reported that Negroponte failed to report a “U.S.-backed operation that resulted in the execution of nine prisoners and the disappearance of an American priest.” The year Carney was murdered, Negroponte praised Gen. Álvarez Martínez’s “dedication to democracy.”
Catholic Vote’s justification for Fr. Carney’s death: “Carney died during an invasion of Honduras with a group of approximately 100 fellow communist insurgents, trained by communists in Nicaragua and Cuba.” That is how Ronald Reagan and Negroponte preferred for these events to be publicly explained. That propaganda is necessary for Kaine’s meeting with Fr. Carney 35 years ago to be manufactured into a controversy.
John Negroponte, who went on to become George W. Bush’s director of national intelligence, has endorsed Kaine’s running mate, Hillary Clinton — a fact the campaign has proudly promoted. Perhaps that should be the focus of any scandal involving Fr. Carney and the Clinton campaign — and not some meeting Tim Kaine had as a law student three decades ago.
That may be difficult for Clinton. She engaged in the same kind of red baiting against Bernie Sanders over comments Sanders made about the Nicaraguan Sandinistas, who fought the Contra death squads passionately supported by Clinton’s endorser Negroponte.
Awkward.
Negroponte is a monster, and if he supports Clinton that is yet another reason for me not to.
My only question is what happened to Tim Kaine since then?
Given Kaine’s neoliberal leanings you gotta wonder what he was actually doing in Central America.
I don’t get it. You know how corrosive and corrupt US leadership has been since JKF, but when it comes to 911 you think the same people who lied about the reasons for going to war against Iraq are telling the truth. It’s not logical.
Your Children of the Corn “squad” seems apocalyptic.
“Cry of the People”
Penny Lernoux
Role of the Catholic Church in Latin America
Pub 1980/1982
Good article, thanks for writing this.
(plus, we don’t like his name)
This is very much in the tradition of CIA wet ops going back to the 1960s
If I recall, CIA Director Helms was a Democrat, and that Operation Condor and the Chilean Coup were his work (ably directed thereafter by Kissinger and Nixon). Negroponte comes out of that tradition. Both Condor and the Coup involved a lot of aerial drops of human bodies in Latin America, some of them US Citizens.
Even earlier. The first thing the OSS did was side with the Greek fascists after the war. That’s how the US rolls.
Yahoo has hacked my email for years. I use google now. I keep the account to see how many ads I get and its all Ads. Good Job Yahoo….
Yahoo is a disaster. I keep my email there only because I don’t want old friends to lose me.
No need to reach back into history. The Obama Administration is arming Nazi death squads in the Ukraine, jihadist death squads in Syria, and death squads throughout Africa through his beloved AFRICOM. He also supports the death squad enabled government in Columbia and the death-squanders who have taken over Honduras.
Negroponte … you have a friend in the business!
And Hillary worked for the Children’s Defense Fund once upon a time, dontcha know.
In contemporary politics, minor affronts domestically are politically consequential while major brutal crime sprees elsewhere for the benefit of domestic populations are to be ignored.
Queers, women and people of color being given the time of day by Democrats and an occasional legislative civil right is deemed a fair trade off for war crimes that are out of sight, out of mind.
And the liberals paint Trump as the fascist.
spread the word.
also “Hellary is a terrorist magnet”
The only difference that I can see between Trump and Clinton is that both will be a force in taking America forward to the same place. One will do it relatively quickly during his term and the other will contribute to doing it incrementally over some number of years, as has been the progression up to now.
Trump will provoke a deep public introspection and response. …And Clinton, et al, and those that follow will not.
But when you have most of the elected representatives, jurists, and the President supporting mass surveillance and painting Snowden as a villain, any reasonable person has to admit it’s time for a re-think.
Dude, the empire’s war party arguing with itself turns you into tweetstorm.
Thank you for that.
So the rabid right has one kind of paranoia about Tim Kaine’s time in Honduras; here, though, is another:
http://www.madcowprod.com/2016/07/31/tim-kaines-unlikely-biography/
I’ll admit the source is conspiratorial; seems a more persuasive conspiracy theory in this case, however, than that a corporate imperialist like HRC has picked a Marxist fifth columnist as her running mate.
It would be interesting to hear Kaine’s response to a question
about his portrayal by the Daily Beast,
about his interaction with Mr. Carney,
about Mr. Negroponte’s endorsement of his running mate, and
about Hillary’s support of the more recent coup in Honduras.
These are all inter-related and the significance of Kaine’s response
would most likely be found in what he does not say.
His silence will speak loudly.
CatholicVote = Inquisition.
And given how the writer boasts of being affiliated with National Review (“Mater, si; Magister, no!”), it’s clear as to her ideological slant.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/contributors/betsy-woodruff.html
Honduras got locked down by PresPseudObamam and SecofState CrookdClinton when they supported and abetted the 2009 removal of PresZelaya so the B$CEOs Corporations could continue economic slavery.
This is what is left of america’s morality, just depraved theft. Just wait for it to continue and bite us back, no escaping it.
SOA, now: the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC)
Great article.
No no. You have it all wrong. We don’t dislike Hillary for the company she keeps (such as Negroponte, Kriston, Kagan, and Kissinger). We are just sexist.
Honduras is being touted as the beginning of Kaine’s progressive conversion narrative? Yikes.
This definitely “may cause trouble,” as Mr. Scahill so delicately puts it.
Thanks, Jeremy.
It’s good to have someone to serve reminders of a recent and ugly history that many simply don’t know or don’t remember.
The very fact of a Negroponte endorsement probably ought to disqualify a candidate for the presidency.
As for the Catholic right, well, they simply are not and never have been “good Catholics.” Aside from not seeming to have read and understood their own savior’s teaching, they aren’t even in compliance with canon law of the the Church, which requires them to recognize and promote social justice, in keeping with the long-recognized principle of the “preferential option for the poor and vulnerable.”
Let’s see more of your work around here, please. It raises the general tone of the joint. ;^)
I take all your points, about the right not being ‘good Catholics’. Especially I profoundly agree with your statement that ‘a Negroponte endorsement ought to disqualify any candidate from running’.
However, if a good Catholic is one who, by virtue of being a member of that organization, subscribes to its egregious and untenable structures and practices which denigrate, submit and refuse equal rights to girls and women, then how could anyone of good sense and morality maintain membership?
Well, without going into my own assessment of their policies and practices with respect to gender. . . I would simply say that people of good sense and morality do maintain membership in the RCC and that (1) not all of them agree with your judgment on the relevant policies and practices; (2) there is a wide range of positions wrt these matters inside the Church and much room for debate and activism; and (3) not everyone makes choices such as religious affiliation based upon a single issue.
I remember.
It was mid-1980s and I was working (assistant/TA/babysitter.) for a an ex-Jesuit priest who had recently fled Central America with a lot of Liberation Theology in his grip (i.e. suitcase) and had landed a plum teaching position in the heartland of America. *i say ‘ex’ priest because he had, evidently, forsworn the Priesthood (though not his faith in Christ), married an ‘ex-Nun’ and had some babies … hence my ‘babysitting’ duties.
Anyway, he (no, we!) petitioned our newly-minted Senator with relentless pleas and stone-cold ‘facts’ about the grotesquely adverse effects U.S. foreign policy was having in those poor Central American nations only to receive a few form replies seeking our future ‘support’.
*Hard to believe 30 years later that Senator, Whip Mitch ‘Team Mitch’ McConnell, is still feeding so high on the gov. hog …
Reason #515 I will not vote for Hillary Clinton.
Vegas has it 20 to 1 you will break 1,000. I went all in….
Yes very awkward!! Yet another example of where the two candidates ‘red baiting’ is only different in matter of degrees. So predictable this second best candidate choice issue. Did Americans really think that George W. Bush was their nadar?
WAIT A MINUTE…… Hellary backed the latest coup in the Honduras. Hellary supported the evil ones back into power who then murdered Berta Cáceres IN THE HONDURAS
https://theintercept.com/2016/03/11/drugs-dams-and-power-the-murder-of-honduran-activist-berta-caceres/
What is the picture here? Tim Kaine meets with a fellow Jesuit. The Jesuit is tossed from a helicopter. Radical right winger Reagan and terrorist Negroponte secured the Honduras. Hellary aligns with crooked wallstreet profiteers who must have corporat interests in the Honduras
theintercept*dot*com/2016/08/26/clinton-foundation-spin/
So exactly what was Tim Kaine’s role in the murder of a fellow Jesuit and Hellary’s coup in the Honduras?
theintercept*dot*com/2016/07/21/hours-before-hillary-clintons-vp-decision-likely-pick-tim-kaine-praises-the-tpp/
Somebody isn’t telling us something.
WAIT A MINUTE…… Hellary backed the latest coup in the Honduras. Hellary supported the evil ones back into power who then murdered Berta Cáceres IN THE HONDURAS
https://theintercept.com/2016/03/11/drugs-dams-and-power-the-murder-of-honduran-activist-berta-caceres/
What is the picture here? Tim Kaine meets with a fellow Jesuit. The Jesuit is tossed from a helicopter. Radical right winger Reagan and terrorist Negroponte secured the Honduras. Hellary aligns with crooked wallstreet profiteers who must have corporat interests in the Honduras
https://theintercept.com/2016/08/26/clinton-foundation-spin/
So exactly what was Tim Kaine’s role in the murder of a fellow Jesuit and Hellary’s coup in the Honduras?
https://theintercept.com/2016/07/21/hours-before-hillary-clintons-vp-decision-likely-pick-tim-kaine-praises-the-tpp/
Somebody isn’t telling us something.
Looks like this whole bullshit is what bothers me about right wingers and the right wing press. In many cases, right wingers overlap with democrats over policy and deeds. So what do the right wingers do in reaction to somebody who like Kaine supports fracking, TPP, Wall Street deregulation, and is against the public option for Obamacare; policies embraced by the right wing? They constantly create vicious political fictions and smear just because the person has the wrong team jersey. And so off we go into a rat hole to deal with all of this nonsense before we can even begin to discuss substantial issues.
Thanks, this is fascinating. So many revolting things behind the face of the establishment, and such ridiculous theatrics between the two parties of the united duopoly to distract from the common ground of corruption.
we definitely have a situation here. The lockstep predatory inclinations of both parties indicate to me a more powerful decision maker operating both parties, and all i can figure is AIPAC. There must be a council behind them that also pulls the strings for anti-american creeps like blankfein etal.
Clue – the people with the absolute most money that we rarely hear about have to be the decision makers, policy directors, cocooned in their own state of deism.
No conspiracy needed. If your society and culture promotes selfishness, greed, and ignorance, you end up in the current situation, every time. Those three values will inevitably lead to exactly the wrong type of individual and worldview gaining power.
Our tribal ancestors would have put a stop to that toxicity quite quickly, but being so removed from our ancestral way of thinking, having suffered millennia of oppression and violence from the few cultures who initially went against the trend, we find ourselves here.
yes but, once this sort of power takes root, it becomes a family matter, nepotism, inheritance and all the evil that goes with that. Enough time has passed since 24 Dec 1913 for the tribal family scenario to have been baked in.
There are names we havent heard yet i think.
If you pitched this and everything else about these elections and these two candidates as a script for a political film, no Hollywood studio would accept it as anything other than an outrageous dark comedy.
They threw him from a chopper? An old practice, to be sure, done often enough in Vietnam. Great irony here: Timmy Kaine, the banker’s friend, a neoliberal in very good standing, getting red-baited. Republican and reactionary red-baiting are always bad, but ask your average “progressive” talk show host about modern red-baiting by the New Dems–it doesn’t exist–we’re talking about Putin here, for Christ’s sake, the devil himself!
John Negroponte? A country with a democratic future would have locked that murderous lunatic up decades ago. But no. For more irony, expect Negroponte to show up somewhere in a Clinton administration. He and Kaine will likely be sitting across from one another at a State function, where they can laugh off the whole thing. It’s just one of those things . . . .
Thank you, Jeremy. I know that you have a family background on the Catholic left. Mine is from the Catholic far right. So we both know exactly how rancidly these Kaine attackers think.
The great pity is the Tim Kaine no longer remotely resembles the person who did what he did 30 years ago. Were it otherwise, he wouldn’t be HRC’s running mate.
You recommend the film The Mission. Let me strongly second that. It’s stunningly beautiful on every level, including the music.
I, too, have many rightist Catholic relatives. An uncle of mine was a Dominican priest. He hated the Jesuits–he considered them to be leftist bums and agitators, and when he learned of the murder of those four priests in El Salvador (along with their housekeepers) he said essentially that they had it coming. “They were executed with automatic rifle fire!” I cried. “Too bad about it,” he said, and that was that. Over thirty years later, a Democratic Executive branch countenances the overthrow of a government in Honduras, supplanted by right-wing freaks. Business as usual. So glad Kaine is on board for that sort of thing now.
Your uncle is my parental units, and many of their friends. My father was the only Irish-Catholic academic in the United States who voted for Richard Nixon in 1960, because commies.
An amazing amount of my aunts and uncles are Catholic reactionaries, as are their children. Lately, I feel like I’m the only leftist left among everyone in my family–not that any of my family were ever leftists, but certainly they understood that my uncle was way out on the fringe. The funny thing is, many of them started out as Democrats in the 50’s and early 60’s. As soon as the real left started to creep into the party (e.g., a clamoring by minorities for something like equal rights, and the burgeoning activism against the Vietnam war), they bailed, and it’s been downhill ever since, and here we are, with the Democratic Party a horror of Good Intentions and endless braying about “equality” and “diversity.” The sooner the Party dies, the better.
Ditto another great Scahill piece. Not only does Tim Kaine no longer remotely resemble the person who we are told did what he did 30 years ago– let him get in line– you could add both Clintons to that and of course the modern master Tony Blair.
I often wonder how much of what was alleged behavior in ” the early years” really happened or is it all part of the PR spin that is so entrenched in modern politics.
My own trajectory has been the opposite of the usual. I was weened on reactionary Catholicism. By my 20s I was an atheist and socially liberal — a libertarian.
Civil liberties are my passion. Eventually I saw, however, that the state is not the only entity inimical to human liberty and happiness. Unrestrained corporate power is as well. Moreover, capitalism can and has failed on many occasions, so even the egregious errors of Westerners enamored with Stalin make sense as a matter of cause and effect. Anyway, now I’m considered by most to be on the left — at the age of 60.