The presidential race and legislative offices aren’t the only things on voters’ ballots on Tuesday. Around the country, voters will also get to decide ballot measures that could change the lives of millions of Americans — offering them access to cheaper prescription drugs, for instance, or legalizing the sale of recreational marijuana, or changing the system by which they vote altogether.
Here are 11 issues on state ballots that could change America:
- Cheaper Pharmaceutical Drugs and True Universal Health Care (California and Colorado): California’s Proposition 61 could potentially dramatically lower the prices of pharmaceutical drugs for many in the state, as it would mandate state agencies to purchase medicine at a price no higher than what the Department of Veterans Affairs pays for them (it negotiates prices to lower them considerably). The big drug companies have spent over $100 million trying to stop the initiative. Meanwhile, in Colorado, voters will have a chance to enact a truly universal health care system with Amendment 69, which would direct the state to adopt a single-payer plan. The health insurance industry has hired Democratic consultants to try to stop the push.
- A Different Way to Vote That Busts Up the Two-Party Duopoly (Maine): In Maine, voters will have an opportunity to enact a ranked-choice voting system — becoming the first state to do so statewide. Under this system, voters choose not just one candidate at the ballot, but rank their preferences between different parties and candidates — empowering voters to vote for third-party and independent candidates without worrying about viability. If no candidate receives the majority of first-preference votes, then the candidates who finished last are eliminated each round until the winning candidate has the majority of votes. Maine, a state where independent candidates are popular, is a great place to start with such a system — the current Republican Governor Paul LePage has never received a majority of votes thanks to three-way vote splitting, something that is not possible under a ranked-choice system.
- Curtail the Influence of Money in Politics (South Dakota, Missouri): Voters in South Dakota will decide the fate of Initiated Measure 22, the South Dakota Government Accountability and Anti-Corruption Act. Currently, South Dakota is the only state in the country where lobbyists can give an unlimited number of secret gifts to lawmakers. The measure would, among other things, limit the gifts an individual lobbyist can give a lawmaker to a value of $100 a year. In Missouri, candidates can rake in virtually unlimited contributions from megadonors, and the governor’s race is the nation’s most expensive, topping $50 million in spending. With Amendment 2, voters can change that. It would enact rules that cap donations to individual candidates to $2,600.
- Boost the Minimum Wage, or Lower it for the Young (Arizona, Colorado, Maine, South Dakota, Washington): Four states — Arizona, Colorado, Maine, and Washington — will have initiatives on the ballot to raise the minimum wage. But one state, South Dakota, is asking voters for permission to lower the state minimum wage from $8.50 to $7.50 for workers under age 18.
- Expand Charter Schools and School Takeovers (Massachusetts, Georgia): Massachusetts voters will decide the fate of Question 2, which would lift the state’s charter school cap and allow up to 12 independent charter schools to be established each year. Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who represents the state, came out against the initiative in late September, raising concerns that it would help drain funding away from traditional public schools. In Georgia, Amendment 1 would empower the state to take over what it deems to be failing schools and potentially shut them down or convert them into charter schools. The amendment has faced fierce opposition from teachers, who see it as a way of undermining local control of public education.
- Legalize Marijuana (California, Massachusetts, Maine, Arizona and Nevada): Five states are looking at legalizing recreational marijuana. The ballot measures would allow for states to regulate marijuana sales and generate tax revenue. A 15 percent California sales tax would go toward drug research and law enforcement, and a 10 percent Maine sales tax would to to a general fund. People age 21 or older would be allowed to possess a limited amount of weed in these states, though in Arizona and Nevada they would be fined if caught smoking in public view. The pharmaceutical industry, alcohol industry, police and prison guard groups and billionaire casino magnate Sheldon Adelson have bankrolled the opposition to these measures. Jerry Brown of California is the only governor of the five states who has not spoken against the measures; he has declined to take a position. Three other states — Montana, Florida, and North Dakota — are looking at legalizing medical marijuana.

A man fills out Federal background check paperwork as he purchases a handgun at the K&W Gunworks store on Jan. 5, 2016, in Delray Beach, Florida.
Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
- Background Checks for Guns and Other Restrictions (California, Maine, Nevada, Washington): Three states — California, Maine, and Nevada — have ballot measures that would strengthen measures requiring background checks for gun purchases or for the purchase of ammunition. In Washington, Initiative 1491 would empower judges to remove an individual’s access to firearms if it was deemed they were a danger to themselves or others.
- End or Restore the Death Penalty (California, Nebraska): Two states, California and Nebraska, are revisiting whether prisoners should be subject to capital punishment. California has two ballot measures — Proposition 62 would repeal the death penalty, while Proposition 66 would speed up the appeals process and increase the amount of a prisoner’s wages that would go to a victim’s family for restitution. Since the two measures contradict each other, the ballot measure with the most “yes” votes will pass. In Nebraska, voters are being asked to overturn the death penalty ban passed by the state legislature in May 2015.
- Ensure Rights for the Incarcerated (Colorado, California, New Mexico): In Colorado, Amendment T would forbid authorities from forcing prisoners to do unpaid labor. It would remove language about slavery from the Colorado constitution that the head of the state’s ACLU called “archaic and offensive.” In New Mexico, Constitutional Amendment 1 would prevent officials from keeping people in jail solely because they can’t pay bail, and allow for defendants who are proven dangerous to be denied bail entirely. California Proposition 57, pushed by Gov. Jerry Brown, would create more opportunities for parole for people in prison for nonviolent crimes. It would also let judges, rather than prosecutors, decide whether a juvenile should be tried in court as an adult.
- Protect Animals (Massachusetts, Montana, Oregon): In Massachusetts, Question 3 would ban sales of eggs, veal, or pork from farms where animals are kept in spaces so small that they cannot stand up or move around freely. A measure in Montana would ban animal traps on state public lands. Oregon’s Measure 100 would prohibit the sale of products made from 12 types of animals, including lions, elephants, and sea turtles. Exemptions would apply for inheritances, antiques, certain musical instruments, and members of Native American tribes.
- Raise Taxes (Oregon, Washington): Oregon’s Measure 97 would increase the corporate gross sales tax, generating an estimated $25 million in revenue to be used for the state to fund its needs. It is the most expensive ballot battle in Oregon’s history with $42 million spent during the campaign. In Washington, Initiative 732 seeks to establish a carbon tax, although the environmental community there is split on the measure.
In addition to these state referendums, some cities are voting on innovative measures as well. For example, in San Francisco, voters will decide whether to lower the voting age to 16.
Top photo: Marijuana plants grow at Perennial Holistic Wellness Center medical marijuana dispensary, which opened in 2006, on July 25, 2012, in Los Angeles, California.
Here in Vagina, there are two constitutional amendments on the ballot, neither of which receiving any pre-election publicity in any of the rags I read. The first is one of those so-called Right to Work amendments, designed to further weaken unions in a state where they are already almost non-existent. The second provides tax exemptions to the spouses of firemen or cops who die in the line of duty. I might have voted for that one if it also included the spouses of farmers, postmen, electricians and auto mechanics – all of whom die more frequently in their lines of work than cops do and who are more essential to society. But of course the Forces Of Order must look after their own.
are you Prince Charles by any chance?
Legalization is the common sense solution. The Colorado Department of Public Health found that legalization actually decreased teen use. In addition Oregon has so much revenue from taxing cannabis, they don’t know what to do with it. At this point everyone who wants to be using cannabis already is. Legalization is just about taxing and regulating it.
Im voting Yes for Proposition 4 in MA not because I like cannabis, but because voting yes protects children and helps raise a ton of tax revenue.
… so Charles, i’m confused
IF: In addition Oregon has so much revenue from taxing cannabis, they don’t know what to do with it.
THEN WHY: Raise Taxes (Oregon, Washington): Oregon’s Measure 97 would increase the corporate gross sales tax, generating an estimated $25 million in revenue to be used for the state to fund its needs. It is the most expensive ballot battle in Oregon’s history with $42 million spent during the campaign.
… that does not make sense
in addition to pot there are some really cool things developing in just a few states, things the population in all 50 states would like to experience equally. i really think the concept of individual states is out moded and is actually an impediment to enhancing people’s lives. individual states create a fragmented not a unified society.
I hope the single payer thing passes so that the rest of the country can watch the catastrophe unfold. Vermont tried something similar, but when the government saw the enormity of the tax increases needed to fund it, they scrapped the idea.
As a Vermonter I can tell you that we ended up repealing our single payer healthcare because insurance companies refused to negotiate with us and we were faced with paying an excessive cost per person or to back down on single payer care.
This happened because we’re small.
All those insurance companies could afford to cut support to the population of VT without it affecting their bottom line, but CA is an entirely different matter, I hope CA does vote to adopt single payer health care and the rest of the country follows in their path. It will yield an impressive reduction in cost per person assuming insurance lobbyists don’t manage to mess it up again.
The guy down the street is in the DEA, he doesn’t care if people smoke pot. It’s not the real problem. Not only that, ZERO people died from smoking pot in 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, etc.
The FEDS know pot isn’t dangerous. It is however easy money for the courts, criminal justice system, and so forth. That is why it’s still in play – they make billions in fines.
So Point 11 – to pass a bill that would enable Oregon to raise taxes enough to generate $25million in much-needed revenues, they have spent $42million?
The Average American is like some half-dead horror movie victim being sucked dry by a vampiric federal government and bloated ghoulish corporations. It is just disturbing to witness and worrying to know they want us next.
There appears to be an error. The Oregon Measure 97 tax applies to corporations with over $25 million of sales, and is projected to generate $3 billion per year in tax revenue.
I also voted for Amendment T, to eliminate Colorado’s constitutional “exception” to the ban on slavery – for criminals. “Slaves” are unacceptable anywhere, even inside the prison industrial complex – or perhaps in this still very racist society that should be especially.
Right there with ya on both measures! :-)
Why should the minimum wage be lowered for people who are trying to save for college and start their lives?
I voted last week for Colorado’s single payer universal-care amendment (69), and hope it passes today.
no wonder illinois is in fiscal trouble; they can’t even see a cash cow when one strolls by.
Hey, America! Put down those joints and try focusing on why you have a vain serial sex offender with a bad toupee and links to organised crime hell-bent on enriching himself and a vain megalomaniacal warmonger hell-bent on starting a war to enrich a whole load of really dangerous megalomaniacal associates as the only two viable candidates for the presidency of your insanely rich and powerful country.
And if you are too stoned to understand this question the first time, read it again in a few hours when the trippy buzz has worn off and you’ve had a nap.
Drugs don’t set you free, they incarcerate your mind and body and then the legal system incarcerates you for being so dumb as to take them. Drugs are for selfish morons, which is why Americans love them so much. I am sure Hillary will let you catch a fire – without inhaling of course – whilst she burns Syria and Iran and raises the temperature with China and Russia.
Look at little Andrew and nfjtakfa below, haven’t outgrown their teenage rebellion years yet and need to escape their tedious lives with some even more tedious herb. Bless.
Way to buy the propaganda hook, line and sinker. Sorry, this isn’t the 1930s anymore. Would’ve been nice if you had made a legitimate argument, but I guess that was asking for too much. You tried it though.
Medically speaking, the majority of states and voters now think you – and the DEA – are full of ignorant shit. Not only that, but tomorrow America will wake up to somewhere between 15% and 20% of the states having legalized cannabis for recreational purposes. I don’t usually wish ill on others but if ending this country’s contemptible drug war, and especially the insane eradication of one of Earth’s most valuable plants, eventually costs you your job – I couldn’t be happier.
So, all mind-altering drugs ought to be made illegal then, huh? Including those with positive health benefits? Idiot.
LMAO, read it & WEEP. How does defeat feel?
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/09/501350808/4-states-opt-to-raise-minimum-wage-6-loosen-marijuana-laws
End the prohibition! Pass marijuana legalization across the board today people!
Here’s hoping voters piss on the DEA and a weed state happens near YOU!
It is these kinds of local initiatives that are going to bring about the most change, it seems. Clinton seems as if she will provide only infinitesimal change. She might have a chance to get women equal pay and overturn Citizen’s United — but we shall see. After all, Clinton has actually won the endorsement of many Republicans and the split within the Republican Party may allow her to reach out to many disenchanted with Donald Trump. In other words, we might have a bipartisan Congress. That is scary when you think about it: Why should we negotiate anything with the Republicans? (Disclosure, the Democrats disgust me, too. But, they seem to be right on climate change).
I’m hopeful for WA I-735. Quoting the ‘intent’ section of the text: “This act declares that the people of Washington State support amending The Constitution of the United States to eliminate the undue influence of concentrated money and political power on elections and governmental policy. The amendment would overturn decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States extending constitutional rights to corporations and other artificial legal entities as well as those decisions equating the spending of money with free speech. It also provides for the regulation and disclosure of political contributions and spending.”
http://www.wamend.org/
I really hope Maine voters show enough sense and courage to vote in favor of the Ranked Choice ballot initiative. It could become an example for other states to follow and make our country more democratic (as in the elections) and on par with many other countries around the world that use ranked choice or proportional representation systems.
Yes! I have long been an advocate for this sensible reform. You can bet that if it passes the two major parties will start to turn their attention to quashing similar ballot measures in the future.
so true, a quantum leap in the direction of election freedom. of course, it will have the republicans gouging out their eyeballs [ or some other painful activity ]
Ranked choice voting is garbage. It is one of the most insidious scams imaginable, because it rewards name familiarity at the expense of every other candidate attribute, once voters get beyond their first and second (or last) choices. The deep-pocketed right wing is rubbing its hands with glee at the prospect of gaming this system. It can play the long game with attractive, pablum-spewing candidates who will be able to hide their true agendas, and their backers, until in office.
Pierce County WA experienced this a couple years ago, when a “perennial candidate” was elected County Assessor because people knew his name from previous races. His term was an utter disaster, and after he survived a recall attempt, he was finally removed from office in the same general election that saw the voters wipe the experiment in ranked choice voting off the books, with 71 percent of the vote.
I have to agree with you: ranked choice is a band-aid. If we want to fix the system then we should have proportional representation in the House, the way it is done in virtually every other advanced country. Strike that – in every advanced country, because as is evident by the choices presented to us in this election the US is no longer an advanced country.
For my neighbors in California, I will fill it in a little bit.
We have seventeen ballot initiatives.
Per your subjects:
Prop 61 Lower drug costs.
MotherJones writer and CA resident Kevin Drum said this is his hardest NO vote. We amend the constitution with our ballot initiatives, so if there is a mistake, it’s very hard to undue. See Prop 13.
I am strongly supporting it.
CA Prop 59 Overturn CU. Money in politics.
This is the feel-good vote against CU. Because it’s feel-good only, I suggest no.
CA Prop 64 – Legalizing Pot. A neighbor brought up a concern from his friend, an LA Prosecutor, about THC oil becoming widely available. I haven’t seen anything about it – but think it’s a scare tactic.
Mom and Pops have a five year jump.
Don’t know why we need more law enforcement in the premier police state and think it should go into the general fund.
But, of course it should be legal.
Prop 63 on background checks. We already have laws on high capacity magazines and sellers do background checks. Our Lt Governor, Gavin Newsome, wrote this prop before we passed our enhanced gun laws. Not necessary anymore. Vote no.
CA Prop 62
Death Penalty repeal/finally? Strong yes.
CA Prop 57 Early parole, yes.
CA Prop 55 – extend the taxes on wealthy citizens until 2030.
Kevin Drum thinks here that the CA Legislators should do their job and pass a better tax deal, which “might include higher taxes on the rich.”
Kevin calls these ballot-box budgeting. He’s right.
I don’t have a problem with extending the tax.