When Barack Obama leaves the White House, New York Sen. Chuck Schumer will almost certainly be elected Senate minority leader — and therefore become the highest ranking Democratic official in America.
That’s a terrible roll of the dice for Democrats, because Schumer might as well have been grown in a lab to be exactly the wrong face for opposition to Donald Trump:
- Schumer, who’s just about to turn 66, grew up in Brooklyn and went to the same high school as Bernie Sanders. Then their lives diverged: Schumer, the smartiest of the smartypants, got a perfect score on the SATs and then went to Harvard and Harvard Law School. He was elected to the New York State Assembly at 23, the U.S. Congress at 29, and the U.S. Senate at 47. He’s never had any adult job outside elected office.
- He possesses the same impressive political acumen as Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign, sagely explaining “For every blue-collar Democrat we lose in western Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia, and you can repeat that in Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin.”
- Schumer’s done more than anyone except Bill and Hillary Clinton to intertwine Wall Street and the Democratic Party. He raises millions and millions of dollars from the finance industry, both for himself and for other Democrats. In return, he voted to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 and voted to bail out Wall Street in 2008. In between, he slashed fees paid by banks to the Securities and Exchange Commission to pay for regulatory enforcement, and eviscerated congressional efforts to crack down on rating agencies.
- Schumer has long been the Democrats’ point man in efforts to craft a bipartisan deal to slash taxes on multinational corporations.
- Schumer voted for the Patriot Act in 2001, and sponsored its predecessor, the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995. During a Senate hearing, Schumer explained that “it’s easy to sit back in the armchair and say that torture can never be used. But when you’re in the foxhole, it’s a very different deal.” In certain cases, he said, “most senators” would say “do what you have to do.” Schumer also defended the New York Police Department’s surveillance of Muslims across the region, which Trump has cited as a national model.
- In October 2002, Schumer voted for the Iraq War by giving George W. Bush authority to invade. In a speech explaining his vote, Schumer warned of Iraq’s imaginary yet “vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons.”
- Schumer voted against Barack Obama’s deal to limit Iran’s ability to enrich uranium and potentially develop a nuclear weapons program.
- Perhaps worst of all, Schumer gave Anthony Weiner his start, first hiring him on his staff, then encouraging him to run for office and then endorsing Weiner in the race for Schumer’s seat when Schumer was running for the Senate in 1998. Thanks, Chuck.
Are there any positive things about Chuck Schumer? Well … he did vote against NAFTA in 1993, and while he’s supported other trade deals since, he made negative noises about the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Also, he’s a talented matchmaker with as many as 11 marriages to his credit. And he’s the second cousin once removed of Amy Schumer, which you might see as good or bad, depending.
Top photo: Sen. Charles Schumer speaks to members of the media on May 14, 2015, at the Capitol in Washington, DC.
Americans keep electing career politicians. Most have no real world experience because they are protected. Chuck will still be making law into his 80s and 90s, still with not real world experience. The definition of insanity is when we allow Congressman and Senators to serve in their 80s and 90s, while American Citizens have mandtory retirement in their 60s aand 70s. At 80 years old you’re no longer effective and simply collecting a paycheck or tax payers money. Yet we the people allow this to happen
Like him or not, you can’t get rid of Schumer without first checking with Israel, which bought the majority of the government, a long time ago. To deliver ablow, you have to know where to go.
The mistake here is that you’re supposing that the pay-to-play scheme called the Democratic Party isn’t right where it wants to be with Chucky at the helm. One neoliberal/neocon party was lined up behind HRC, they didn’t even hardly pretend to be anything else. Chuck is the leader of that cabal now. Apparently they still only need to play opposition to Trump. They’ll operate with impunity and still have more than half the low information electorate behind their endless war and wall street coalition. Trump will be a goldmine to them.
I’m from NY State, am Left of Left & agree he stinks. But… the wisest professional politicians in the U.S. are reading the writing on the wall- via future demographics & current issues… and well, maybe some good can come out of this… hope this particular opportunist respects the waves of the future hitting the shores of now… this article points to some good signs in those regards…
http://reverbpress.com/politics/chuck-schumer-gives-bernie-sanders-the-green-light-calling-for-the-democratic-party-to-be-transformed-video/
Schummer voted (as well as many other dems) to give Saudis weapons to kill Yemen kids so we get our cheap oil on sept 21
Mentioning Weiner is crass and hurts your case. Someone’s infidelity is not something I care about in a politician. The people he flirts with aren’t going to impact me. Policies, however, will.
Schumer was on one of the Sunday news shows. In what must be one of the greatest combination stealth and preemptive political moves ever Schumer said twice that eliminating the ‘carried interest’ loophole would be high on the Democratic legislative agenda. Not too long Schumer was known as Chuck ‘carried interest’ Schumer for blocking changes or eliminating this loophole gift to Wall Street.
Somewhat interesting to see one Jew bash another, yet the author fails to either notice or mention that nearly all what Schumer has done benefits The Tribe in the greater scheme of things, especially his support of Criminal Wall St. behaviors.
Of course he is, this is the course of our lives in the United States these days. The country, from its founding, has many ugly secrets, slowly leaking out, that gainsay what it says it is and pretends to be, and must cover up with not only rabid flag-waving patriotism, but liberal hubris. These contradictions beg for resolution, and until we at least attempt to do so, which will require far more honesty, courage, and radical change than anyone anywhere near the seats of power has come up with yet (though Bernie’s something we’ve never seen before), it will flounder and continue sinking into the depths of its own hypocrisy.
So, I’m guessing that Schwartz does not see Schumer’s total subservience to Israel & it’s American Lobby as on of his downsides, or was there just a space limitation?
Nice summation of Chucky’s staunch neo-liberal creds. If I may, you forgot to mention his HUGELY pro-Israel stance. Let us not forget his contribution to Palestinian genocide.
Thanks for that. Didn’t know enough about him. Can now say: fck Chuck!
While Schumer was democratically elected, he is most certainly NOT the highest ranking Democratic official in America; that would be Donald Trump. Schumer is the highest ranking Democrat official in America. Democrats are not necessarily democratic: Trump election protests, election fraud, Democrat supported lax voter identification laws and the entire Obamacare legislative process demonstrate this conclusively.
Democratic is actually correct. America is a republic, not a democracy.
I couldn’t agree more Jon. You know the man well.
And if anybody cares, Schumer is in AIPAC’s back pocket.
That’s why he is so hawkish in Middle East policy – he’s blinded by AIPAC.
Schumer’s blocked closing the Carried Interest tax loophole for many years. His excuse? “They’re my constituents.” And his opposition to the Iran Nuclear Deal exhibited a craven disregard for national security.
I want to say……..hahahahah…….that I think…….hahaha.. it will work out well.
I had an intuition that the Democratic Party would not be able to pull its head out of its butt when it came to giving up the massive donations it’s carefully cultivated over the years. Of course, it’s assuming that catering to actual progressives would condemn their funding . . .
Looks like it’s time to work on starting a viable third party for progressives!
Amen.
The Democratic party just can’t figure out how to stop screwing the pooch. The establishment is trying to hold onto power while making ineffective gestures toward solving their actual problem with the base. The base is well beyond wise to them, however. The more they double down with third-way triangulation and neoliberal policy leanings, the more they expose themselves as inauthentic.
It was Chuckie’s turn.
But I remember Congressman Schumer who, at the first Earth Day rally in NYC on April 22, 1970, got up on the podium and lectured all of us about…
…wait for it…
Global Cooling.
So allow me to finish the rhyme:
So we’re told, “It was Chuckie’s turn.”
Because the Dims, well, they still haven’t learned.
I’m as anti-Schumer as anyone, but you’re completely wrong when you say that anger at neoliberal economics fueled Trump. If you were right about that, then Trumpists would be howling in protest against the selection of a Goldman Sachs exec for Treasury Secretary, the selection of a Verizon lobbyist for a slot at the FCC, the rise of crooked corporate gunslinger who took millions from Arab dictatorships for Secretary of State, the selection of climate change deniers for the EPA, etc…
Trumpists haven’t raised a peep of protest because they don’t care about economics. They care about race and only race. By naming Bannon and promising to deport immigrants immediately, Trump has been delivering on his promise to Make America White Again.
“If you were right about that, then Trumpists would be howling in protest against the selection of a Goldman Sachs exec for Treasury Secretary…”
I’d agree with that premise if I didn’t actually have family and friends who wholeheartedly bought into Trumps MAGA fantasy.
None that I know first hand are policy wonks, nor will they track who Trump picks in that area. Why not? Because they voted for Trump not for his policy credentials (such as they ever were explained, which they weren’t) but for the simple idea that someone needs to Make America Great Again, and that someone is Trump.
Trump will do it because he said he would and because they believe him. That is literally all they need right now.
That this likely won’t happen for a variety of reasons, much of which has to do with Trump’s early commitment (if ever he does really commit to anything) in allowing the very folks who brought us the economic certainties is simply beside the point to most of those who voted for Trump.
Political theorist Peter LaVenia rightly categorizes it in this way:
More of the article can be read here.
So the broad-brushed claim you make that the folks in this demographic (Trump voters) only “care about race and only race” is dangerous and uniformed.
I can say this with a fair degree of certainty because this demographic (sans the alt-right bigotry which undoubtedly includes many of the most vocal which we have been hearing from for months) nonetheless are predominately comprised of folks that I have lived with and worked with for decades. Those I know personally reside in various regions of the country, from rural California to suburban Ohio, and they are pretty much just like you and I.
Your “it’s the racism!” claim falls completely short in attempting to explain this, as it neglects the fact that these Americans do care about the economy as much as the rest of us, and that the demonstrable reasons we are where we are toady is more a result of the Democrats and Republican comminglement into a single, corporate-class oligarchy that has ignored their economic pain than it is to do with anything the alt-right or Hillary supporters want to claim it’s about.
Great analysis! It’s analogous to calling a person with left leaning politics a communist because he/she has concerns about corporatism and wealth inequality. Not only is the label offensive and irrelevant, but it also shuts down any reasonable political discussion.
You are so full of crap. “They’re all racist.” You’re a racist. I voted for my freedom. I voted for the rule of law. I voted for the constitution. I voted against tyranny. I voted for capitalism. I voted against corporatism/communism. I voted against poverty. I voted against corrupt politics. The Democratic Party is the most morally and spiritually bereft group of people in our history. Anyone that can justify birthing a baby and sticking a scissors in the back of its neck is capable of all measures of evil. Your lies fool only you. I could go on but you’re too much of an ignoramous to absorb it.
Wait, Bernie has never held an actual job as wel…
Schumer was unanimously elected Senate minority leader, this morning.
Add to it, that he is a blind man with unwavering support for the state of Israel.
The DNC? Chumps.
The DNC rides again. This time to oblivion?
The Republicans got it made now.
Common, why should the dems learn anything from this election?
Impressive resume. Chuck’s MY MAN!
“From January through June, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee raised nearly $2 million from executives and employees of private equity and hedge fund firms like the Carlyle Group and the Blackstone Group, according to analyses of campaign finance disclosure reports conducted by the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that researches the influence of money in politics, and by The New York Times. The $2 million figure, which includes contributions from relatives of employees and executives, is a low-end estimate because many donors do not list their employers on financial disclosure reports.
Industry executives say they value the role Mr. Schumer plays. John G. Gaine, the president of the Managed Funds Association, the main hedge fund trade group, described the senator as a “critical figure in the debate” and a “guardian of America’s capital market and, more parochially, New York’s economic interest.””
JULY 30, 2007
“Mr. Schumer said he and other lawmakers were listening to their constituents, who were reacting with “amazement, astonishment and intense anger” to the original outlines of the $700 billion plan, as laid out by the Bush administration, and to the high-risk behavior that spawned the crisis.
“We were told that markets knew best, and that we were entering a new world of global growth and prosperity,” Mr. Schumer said as the committee greeted Mr. Bernanke, who is testifying on Capitol Hill for a second consecutive day. “We now have to pay for the greed and recklessness of those who should have known better.”
It is time, Mr. Schumer said, for the American economy to be revived as the “engine of prosperity,” rather than as a “casino” for high-rollers in the realm of finance.”
September 24, 2008
“California’s attorney general is reviewing a request by former employees of IndyMac Bancorp Inc to investigate whether a New York senator triggered the bank’s collapse by releasing confidential information.
At issue is a much-publicized letter that Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, sent in June to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) and Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) questioning the company’s ability to survive.
The FDIC took control of IndyMac on July 11 after depositors withdrew more than $1.3 billion over 11 days. It was the third-largest bank failure in U.S. history. At the time, OTS Director John Reich blamed Schumer’s letter for causing the run on the bank.”
August 21, 2008
“When President Bush tapped Michael B. Mukasey to lead the scandal-plagued Justice Department nine months ago, Senator Charles E. Schumer could not say enough good things about his fellow New Yorker. Mr. Schumer ran out of time in ticking off Mr. Mukasey’s accomplishments at his Senate hearing, and the senator’s vote of support ensured his confirmation as attorney general.”
July 23, 2008
“OTS announced Friday that it was taking over the $32 billion IndyMac and transferring control to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation – and the agency pointed the finger directly at Schumer for the failure, accusing him of sparking a bank run by releasing a letter that “expressed concerns about IndyMac’s viability.”
“In the following 11 business days, depositors withdrew more than $1.3 billion from their accounts,” the OTS said in a statement announcing the California-based lender’s takeover. The statement included a quote from OTS Director John Reich saying, “Although this institution was already in distress, I am troubled by any interference in the regulatory process.””
July 13, 2008
“In a recent interview, Mr. Frank said he realized the need for tighter regulation of Wall Street firms after a meeting with Charles O. Prince III, then chairman of Citigroup.
When Mr. Frank asked why Citigroup had kept billions of dollars in “structured investment vehicles” off the firm’s balance sheet, he recalled, Mr. Prince responded that Citigroup, as a bank holding company, would have been at a disadvantage because investment firms can operate with higher debt and lower capital reserves.
Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, has taken a similar stance.
“Commercial banks continue to be supervised closely, and are subject to a host of rules meant to limit systemic risk,” Mr. Schumer wrote in an op-ed article on Friday in The Wall Street Journal. “But many other financial institutions, including investment banks and hedge funds, are regulated lightly, if at all, even though they act in many ways like banks.””
March 29, 2008
Who are these people??
“The editorial is somewhat surprising because Rupert Murdoch, the chairman of the News Corporation, which owns The Post, has been seen as cultivating a relationship with Mrs. Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton. In the summer of 2006, Mr. Murdoch, whose political views are highly conservative, played host to a fund-raiser for Mrs. Clinton, causing consternation among many liberals. (Mr. Murdoch had played host to a similar fund-raiser for Senator Charles E. Schumer in 2003 and has given money to other Democrats in the past.)”
January 30, 2008
“The White House welcomed the announcement by Mrs. Feinstein and Mr. Schumer, which appeared to give Mr. Mukasey the margin of support he needed to win approval in the Judiciary Committee, which has 10 Democrats and 9 Republicans.”
“Mr. Schumer, who had proposed Mr. Mukasey’s name to the White House for the Justice Department post and had initially championed his nomination, was under increasing pressure from all sides this week to make clear where he stood. His meeting with Mr. Mukasey appeared to be a last-minute effort to rescue the nomination.”
November 3, 2007
“Mr. Filan was a close associate of Mr. Tusk, the Lehman banker, when Mr. Tusk was deputy governor of Illinois. Mr. Tusk, who also once worked for Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, says he has not played any role in discussions involving privatizing the Illinois lottery since he joined Lehman earlier this year. But Mr. Filan and Mr. Tusk often echo each other when they assert that private operators can run lotteries more effectively.”
OCT. 14, 2007
Wow, love how you think intelligence is a bad thing. Because obviously all we need is for some buffoon born extremely rich to look at a complicated situation and think it’s just so simple.
“He said a tax increase on private equity and hedge fund executives could lead to an exodus of jobs and companies from New York, and even from the country.”
“Some Republicans have taken a more jaundiced view of Mr. Schumer’s intentions. As Senator Charles E. Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, put it in a recent interview with Bloomberg News: “They contribute most of their money to the Democrat Party, and he wants to protect the income. It’s completely contrary to the position he took in the last election, when he was leading the Senate Democratic campaign committee and he talked about the inequity of the tax system.””
“From January through June, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee raised nearly $2 million from executives and employees of private equity and hedge fund firms like the Carlyle Group and the Blackstone Group, according to analyses of campaign finance disclosure reports conducted by the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that researches the influence of money in politics, and by The New York Times. The $2 million figure, which includes contributions from relatives of employees and executives, is a low-end estimate because many donors do not list their employers on financial disclosure reports.
Industry executives say they value the role Mr. Schumer plays. John G. Gaine, the president of the Managed Funds Association, the main hedge fund trade group, described the senator as a “critical figure in the debate” and a “guardian of America’s capital market and, more parochially, New York’s economic interest.””
JULY 30, 2007
“Luckily in terms of Jewish people we have good representation in terms of the Supreme Court. That will continue. One thing I want to assure your listeners Nachum, my name as you know comes from a Hebrew word. It comes from the word shomer, which mean guardian. My ancestors were guardians of the ghetto wall in Chortkov and I believe Hashem, actually, gave me name as one of my roles that is very important in the United States Senate to be a shomer to be A. a shomer for Israel and I will continue to be that with every bone in my body for of the other is against me.”
04/22/10
I’m a lifetime Democrat, but I refused to vote for Hillary. I left my ballot blank on the Presidency. The reason I declined to vote for Hillary is because she was on the take to Wall Street, the CEO’s, and the billionaires. The Clinton’s were worth 100 million, much of this money sponged off CEO’s pals and Wall Street tycoons, and the ever present billionaires (the Clinton’s were on a first name basis with about 90% of the nations billionaires). The reason we have all these billionaires is because wages are low and they are not paying fair share of taxes. Many Democrat have had enough of these baby-boomer sellout politicians like Clinton and Schurmer; this model of the modern Democratic party they have created, which involves Democrats sponging off the CEO’s, the “K” Street lobbyists, the Billionaires, and Wall Street – all anti-labor entities – has got to come to an end, Democrats have had it with the corporate takeover of our party. We are the party of the middle class, the working class, and the working poor. Schurmer is an 80’s era politician – like Clinton was – he needs to retire and move over, let the younger generation serve. These baby boomer era pols are ALL on the take now, to the disgust of so many (see 100 million dollar Clinton net worth).
I’m all for critiquing the media. That’s why I became a regular reader of Glenn’s work.
But Prof. Lemieux is simply incapable of understanding how and why Hillary Clinton and the Dems got their asses kicked. Media coverage, particular what it chooses to cover and how, has a marginal effect. The Democratic Party should never ever been in a position to have close elections if it would fundamentally reassess how it practices politics (and third way triangulating and dice and slicing people into identities isn’t obviously going to cut it to motivate enough human beings to buy into their schtick).
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2016/11/the-only-thing-necessary-for-the-triumph-of-evil-is-for-the-media-to-care-far-more-about-email-management-than-racism
I’m supremely thankfully someone so clueless was never one of my professors in college.
“Perhaps worst of all, Schumer gave Anthony Weiner his start”. Really, you think that’s worse than defending torture or cozying up to Wall Street?
And here’s another to explain what is really happening on the ground, not just in the Rust Belt swing states but everywhere all over the country (somehow didn’t post last time):
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/15/rural-america-working-class-voters-democrats-donald-trump
Another liberal in an overwhelmingly “red” state stating quite plainly why people in her overwhelmingly “red” community in Texas (some racists and misogynists, but many not) voted for someone like Trump rather than Hillary Clinton. It isn’t rocket science, it is literally the fact they and their communities have been economically abandoned by the very people that claim to support them.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/15/rural-america-working-class-voters-democrats-donald-trump
Look the issue for the Democratic Party isn’t to condone or tolerate bigotry or misogyny, but to understand and address the lack of futures (economic and cultural) too many people in America are experiencing. The two aren’t mutually exclusive, and that isn’t rocket science either, and until the Democratic Party finds a way to do both, their electoral prospects are toast for decades IMHO.
President Obama found a way to thread this needle. And so can others. But you can’t simply tell people “move to where the jobs are”, or “take initiative and get the skills for a modern economy”. That’s Republican “bootstrapping” propaganda 101. People are wedded to their “place” in the world in a fundamental self-reinforcing way. That isn’t wrong or right, it is just human. If your economic models and ideology is content to just let them wither away and die because they can’t move (there are severe transactional costs (money, time, housing costs, personal and work connections, family, culture, future, self-worth) for any human to just pack up everything they’ve ever known and move to a new place and attempt to find a new career or job), and you just hang them out to dry and die, don’t be at all surprised they won’t be motivated to hear your message in the absence of actions to support it, or vote for you. They just won’t. Again, this isn’t rocket science it’s a simple understanding of human nature and culture. And the Dems better figure that out real fucking quick, or as I said they are fucking toast for decades.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/15/rural-america-working-class-voters-democrats-donald-trump
Nice knock down of the absurd suggestion that “third-party” candidates like Jill Stein or Gary Johnson acted as spoilers in this election, or that somehow a vote for one is illegitimate on one basis or another:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/15/blame-for-us-election-outcome-not-third-parties-jill-stein
I think the Democratic leadership best open its eyes and realize that Schumer’s time, and the policies he represents, has now passed.
Chuckie is a republican and Likud in every way except for his positions on gun control and abortion. Even Donald Trump was one of his political financiers. Its bad enough that the The Donald is going to occupy the White House and the republicans have control of the house and senate. But with a Neocon like Schumer leading the Democrats he will loyally make sure the Democrats as the minority party will be complicit in pushing threw the most right wing agenda this country has ever experienced. The Democrats do have reasonable people who are capable of leading, yet Schumer is definitely not one of them. Under his reign he has the potential to further alienate the left and liberal base of the Democratic Party, thus muting all the other reasonable progressives in the party that we all voted for and ultimately risking the party breaking apart.
“Before it all went to pieces, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities appeared to be a charmed firm run by a tight clan. People believed in Bernie. Nasdaq made him its chairman; the SEC appointed him to industry panels; Congress invited him to testify. New York Senator Charles Schumer stopped by the office in the run-up to the Iraq war and gave a rousing talk on the trading floor. Everywhere you looked, there were signs that Madoff — and by extension his firm — had special status. Bernie was even able to arrange with his friends the Wilpons, owners of the New York Mets, for staffers to play charity softball games on the field at Shea Stadium.”
April 30, 2009
“as documented in Michael Lewis’ books Liar’s Poker and The Big Short, simply went berserk starting in the 1980s with the development of ever-more-complex financial instruments increasingly divorced from traditional notions of value. An explanation of how finance came to take over the U.S. economy would require its own Slate series.
But Saez, Hacker, and Pierson argue plausibly that the industry’s deregulation (and the protection it received from a few well-placed Democrats like Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York) played a large role.”
Sept. 14, 2010
What the Intercept won’t report is that Obama is now opening up fracking to Ohio’s only national forest.
“The current BLM EA is a shoddy, inadequate document not even worthy of a high school science report. The feds apparently want to give away our forest, climate and communities to the fracking industry and will stop at nothing. NEPA and science don’t seem to be relevant anymore to federal actions. This is a horrifying denial of science, law, and justice.”
– Heather Cantino, ACFAN
You see liberal journalists only report science denial when the denier as a conservative. You won’t learn anything about environmental news here, unless the villain has an ‘R’ next to their name. Liberals don’t care at all about the environment; instead they ignore or rationalize the destruction of the earth unless it suits their political needs.
“What’s the upshot of all this? The defeat of the Brown-Kaufman amendment, which would have broken up the big banks and which went down in flames last week despite bipartisan support. From the report: “The four Democrats with the most staffers lobbying on behalf of big banks — Chris Dodd, Charles Schumer, Tom Carper, and Tim Johnson — all voted against the amendment.””
05-11-10
“Charles Schumer (N.Y.), a top Senate Democrat and member of the body’s antitrust subcommittee, appeared to give his blessing to Comcast’s purchase of Time Warner Cable, but did not mention that his brother was involved in the mega-deal. ”
02/17/2014
“Senator Schumer, an original cosponsor of the resolution, defended his support for declaring preemptive U.S. backing for a preventive Israel-led war on Iran by offering an argument so riddled with intelligence falsehoods that it would have made George W. Bush blush.”
03/14/2013
“And to me, since the Palestinians in Gaza elected Hamas, while certainly there should be humanitarian aid and people not starving to death, to strangle them economically until they see that’s not the way to go, makes sense.”
Jun 11, 2010
Kurt Eichenwald has a piece in Newsweek today. His thinking, captured in his piece, highlights why professional politicians (like Schumer) and beltway pundits are so full of themselves.
Schumer is a symptom of the bigger problem – the “for sale” sign at almost every politician’s door.
I see the usual characters making this to be about being Jewish, Israel, etc. Schumer is loyal to money and reelection – he will take large donations from the Saudis, Israelis, Jews, Christians, Muslims, atheists, or anybody else that will help him get back to the office.
Schumer also is the leader of the Israel Über Alles wing of the Dems. He helped lead the charge to block Obama from appointing Charles Freeman to head the National Intelligence Council. Freeman had committed the mortal sin of putting the interests of the USA above those of Israel.
what a hateful piece. I agree with quite a few of your points about Schumer, but this piece seems calculated to strip the last remaining droplets of influence the Democrats currently in power have away from them. As the comments below show. This is politics. You damage one side, you help the other. Why does The Intercept spend so much time damaging one side (and claiming that doesn’t help the other)? Yeah, the Dems suck. and the GOP just elected a fascist. You don’t get to stand on moral high ground and say both of them suck–they do, but one sucks much worse. And especially if you spend 90% of your time bashing one side, you are making the problem worse. Unless you actually support the other side, which from a lot of angles it seems like The Intercept does, despite its occasional demurrals. (the comments below articles sure have a lot of obvious Trump supporters praising you.)
The Dims don’t need any help from critics to make themselves irrelevant. They do it all on their own. What good are they when all they do is help the GOPhers pass their agenda? They’ve turned compromise into an extreme fetish, and it’s a large part of what has destroyed America.
When your party puts up fascist Republicans to run as its executive candidates, as it has done since 1992, you have no credibility to lecture anyone on how fascist the GOPhers are.
Not a hateful piece at all, but a very necessary example of a person who needs to be driven from the democratic party. The republican-lite, DLC, third-way democrats have proven themselves to be failures and the party needs to shun them and anyone who supported Crooked Hillary over Bernie in the primaries. If the democrats keep pandering to Wall Street and the Lena Dunham/Saturday Night Live crowd then they’re going to continue their descent into a permanent minority party. If people like Schumer, Cory Booker, Harold Ford, or other right-wing assholes are allowed any position of influence or power going forward it will be proof that the democratic party learned nothing from their historic ass-kicking and will continue to lose at all levels.
@ Kidding me
If your entire analysis of this situation and the Democratic Party performance over the last 50 years as a function of results, what you are really arguing is “you all owe us your vote because LOTE” i.e. we aren’t as bad as the other guys.
How’s that working out for the Democratic Party in terms of electoral success, incrementalist policy gains that don’t really address the underlying problems, or in keeping out the worse candidate?
Many of us are arguing that’s a failure based on the results. Nobody owes you their vote. If you can’t figure out why you can’t motivate them to vote for your candidates, you should look in the mirror, reassess your premises, and change your tactics, agenda, policy preferences and be able to deliver. That’s it. If you can’t grasp that simple idea, then you’re toast. That’s Politics and Human Nature 101. If you can’t gain someone’s trust, loyalty or support in whatever context, then maybe you need to think about the idea that maybe the problem is you, or your message, or your tactics of persuasion et al.
Blaming it on the people you fail to motivate is a fool’s errand and never ever ever going to change that reality.
Nothing that anyone has posted on this thread changes the fact that we now have a fascist President. Whoever voted for him will expect results in the form of some economic security. NOT going to happen. Then what?
LISTEN! I just called his office! You have to listen! Listen listen listen!!!!
https://soundcloud.com/will-pflaum-1/call-to-chuck-schumers-office-no-reasons-for-his-leadership-no-legislation-for-working-people
that was very instructive. thank you!
As the dog returns to his vomit, so does a fool return to his folly.
All of which proves that the Democrats still don’t have a clue and for all their lip service to making changes to improve their chances, it’s pretty clear that maintaining the status quo is their ultimate goal.
the democrats are probably thinking that their only mistake was to fix the nomination for clinton. that makes sense. obama is popular. any prominent democrat without clinton’s many problems probably would have beaten trump, or any other republican, just running as obama’s successor. so (in private), they’re probably blaming the whole debacle on clinton, and themselves for anointing her. the thought of handing over the party to sanders and warren is very unlikely to have occurred to them
Schmucky Chucky is the devil we know, sadly. But in times of uncertainty to the enth-degree, we kinda need him (in NY at least).
Any time I read something about this senior citizen, even if its critical, they have to mention his SAT scores.
Another example of intellect not equating to common sense.
He cheated?
Mr. Schwarz
Come on Jon, you forgot the main reason that radical leftists detest Schumer: he is an avid supporter of Israel. The authors of Mondoweiss write:
“…….No doubt dual loyalty can be an anti-semitic charge; but it also can be a legitimate issue……..”
This was aimed at Schumer because he threatened to vote against the Iran nuclear deal. If you are a Jew that openly supports Israel, you risk the duel loyalty charge. There is no question that Schumer represents the establishment wing of the Democratic Party, but let’s not forget the primary reason that many on the far left (and the far right) oppose Schumer.
Amy Schumer… She is a well-connected vulgiarian demonstrating that one can make living while being not funny, not pretty, not smart. She is an embodiment of non-witty vulgarity.
Chuck Schumer is a scum sucking swamp monster.
If you drained the swamp he would be the hairball that keeps stopping the flow.
While Schumer gave Anthony Weiner his start, it is unlikely that he knew about Weiner’s “hobbies”.
I remember Weiner as a fighter, who would not back down from the Republicans. a rare thing in a Democrat. For that alone, people should not be too hard on him as a Congressman. Also, by drawing attention to Clinton’s and others 650,000 emails on his family computer, he helped dump Hillary. For that I am thankful, as she was the Dem’s version of Trump.
Irrelevant. Anyone who wants to still be a member of, support, donate to, or work for the DemocRAT Party, is a lost cause, as is the corrupt party that GAVE US TRUMP.
Time to abandon them entirely, they are corporate corrupt beyond salvation, and Schumer is the most corrupt of all. Build third parties.
Should fit right in with the new administration…
He is going to have to deal with some serious static, Sanders and Warren, Let’s hope to high heaven he does not go along with the possibility that Trump and Cotton will try to undo the Iran deal, Seems like Schumer would be right on board, Terrifying,
Bolton and Schumer could make quite a team cultivating more death and destruction in the middle east,
Unfortunately Sanders’ and Warren’s full throated endorsements of shillary will/has cost them deeply. We now see that they believe the enemy of my enemy is my friend. They joined shillary and with that the DNC, establishment and Wall street.
They went to the podium and campaigned at full volume for Stalin in an attempt to defeat Hitler….
I don’t think I can trust either one of these two the way I wanted to before the primary.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss…
I guess we all got fooled again
Does anyone think Schumer is any less corrupt than Hillary?
The Democrat Party has destroyed itself by selling out to Wall Street and destroying its potential leaders, (like Alan Grayson for example.)
http://www.unz.com/mhudson/break-up-the-democratic-party/
more corrupt.
maybe the corruption maker guy.
look at his face. leather? old worn out catchers mitt?
as if someone has been throwing him fastballs for years and he catches them with his face.
People will never get it.
Where are the protests against Hillary and the DNC?
Liberals are protesting against the iceberg – Trump. The captains of the ship led us all aground.
We need to get off this boat. We should have done it years and years ago
And lest we not forget Tim Canova .Would have been helpful if Bernie had come
down here to stump for him .Money was raised but not enough to help the man
and basically he was pushed aside .Wasserman had one debate at 8AM on a sunday morning with some asinine moderator .
I like this article; and, I never thought to make the Amy – Chuck connection. Thanks for that.
Schumer is a happy ho ho ho.
The current joker in the white house hands US taxpaying citizens $38,000,000,000 of very hard earned working persons money (certainly not from wallstreet pigs, 1% or corporats) and this is what the US gets in trade for that deal –
US censures Israel over legalizing illegal settlements
Ought to be good for another laff how Americans keep getting fricked by a government owned by pimps and run by whores.
meanwhile, the US support of the Saudis who support ISIS who fight IRAN who support Yemen who fight the Saudis who support ISIS who are opposed yet supported by the US….
Yemen forces hit Saudi command center in Najran
11,400 civilians dead to date.
If Dumb&Dumbers arent running the American Gov, please provide some details who is.
He gives identical graduation speeches, year after year, school after school. I attended my brothers graduation speech at NYIT and heard him speak. I graduated from Hofstra later that day and heard the SAME EXACT SPEECH. Word for word, joke for joke. I can’t handle his lame stories and attempts to bait the crowd. He exudes a phoniness that is unnerving.
I actually agree with Jon — but for different reasons. Schumer is a Wall Street Lap-dog. He will make the silly liberals look even more elitist.
Jesus, Mary and Joseph Schumer would support destroying the Iran deal if Trump and team push such a disastrous move,
Aye yi yi
Please democrats find a black radical Muslim with ties to the Muslim brotherhood to run your failing party that truly would be a gas to watch. Think I’m joking Google congressman Keith Ellison. Please please please make him your party leader!
I know like the Muslim Brotherhood is so so so so so very scary. I bet they are under your bed as well as in your head.
And Keith Ellison is so so so very very “radical” and so is his family.
Like totally “radical”, like a family full of doctors, lawyers and Baptist pastors. I’m sure in your mind they really weren’t smart enough or hard working enough to actually become doctors and lawyers, because you know, must have been affirmative action, and of course you’re not a doctor or lawyer so how could anyone with a different color skin than you actually become a doctor or lawyer, ipso facto.
Out of curiosity how many human beings who are Muslims have you actually met and talked to in your lifetime? Please explain to us how different is their love for their children? Or how less hard they are willing to work than you to provide their children a good future? Or how different is their love for their parents and grandparents, which is presumably just like your love for yours. Or not.
Go ahead, we’ll wait. This should be really really interesting. That’s assuming you aren’t just a garden variety blinkered know-nothing bigot who fears “those people” who he/she has never ever actually met or interacted with, ever.
Come on, enlighten all of us how Keith Ellison is such a “radical” and establish all his ties to the scary scary Muslim Brotherhood, which you know is overrunning every community in America from Des Moines to Austin. We’ll wait.
Thank you!
I can see you’ve been triggered. My ploy worked perfectly!
I just enjoy mocking anyone who types something as ridiculous as what you typed. Ploy or not.
But seriously please back Ellison I think he is an excellent choice for your corrupt and backward party.
What, your plot to have him completely blow you out the water. Yeah, worked perfectly.
You are a disgrace to the farming community.
On the contrary John I represent exactly how most farmers feel. Maybe you should take a deep dive into the election results and study the demographics especially White rural voters. It’s smug progressives like yourself that will never understand that a whole other America exists outside the decaying east and west coast cities. So check your elite privilege before opening your judgmental hole again.
In an attempt to stave off a civil war in the ranks, Democratic leaders are scrambling to unite behind a candidate for the party’s chairmanship – and have landed for now on a Louis Farrakhan-linked congressman who once called for Dick Cheney’s impeachment and compared George W. Bush to Hitler. Like I said perfect choice!
Calling for Cheney’s impeachment would put him on better terms with Trump- Trump did not always oppose the Iraq War, but he changed his mind sooner than most.
OTOH, Ellison did think going into Libya was a good idea…
Those are Ellisons strong points,and you do know that Cheney voted for the Hell bitch?
And was it the Muslims who tried to deny Trump POTUS,or was it Zionist Jews?
Confused much?
You are right on point! This nasty biggot is the reason we have Trump.
Good on you for destroying his fabricated fearmongering lies about a decent hardworking politician, one of the few true progressives!
That’s the kind of dem, including Shummer, the self-serving lowlife scum of the DP, that brought us to this bizarre political and economic juncture.
The classic Democrat rebuttal “call anybody who doesn’t agree with your propaganda or agenda a bigot and a racist.” When will you people learn.
First I’m not a Democrat. Second, when you refer to one of your fellow Americans a “radical Muslim” without being able to establish a definition of “radical” or that he even meets that definition, or why any American should have any issue whatsoever with any “Muslim-American” for any reason whatsoever (say for example how a Muslim American is any different than, say, a radical or fundamentalist Christian) then what you are engaging in is called “dogwhistle bigotry”.
And please don’t treat people like they are stupid and don’t know what you are arguing or insinuating. Your argument goes like this–Americans don’t like Muslims (for whatever reason) and think all Muslims are the same, therefore Keith Ellison as some lesser American because of his choice to be a practicing Muslim will destroy the Democratic Party’s political future simply because he is a Muslim and the majority of Americans (in your opinion) don’t like Muslims and don’t want them to participate in American life or even be in America. That’s simple rank bigotry even if you couch it in your simplistic dogwhistle.
Now I personally don’t care if you agree with my agenda, although you couldn’t possible know what my agenda is, except to the extent I think all people should be treated equally under the law, including people I perceive as bigots, so long as they don’t otherwise violate other laws in espousing their bigotry or opinions.
But if you’re going to claim someone is both a “radical Muslim” or in league with the “Muslim Brotherhood” which to my understanding and knowledge has zero influence in America, or over American politician I’m aware of except in your fevered imagination, then I come to one of two immutable conclusion about you: 1) you are a bigot engaged in dogwhistle bigotry because you can’t even evaluate Keith Ellison on anything he’s done or said except the fact he is a Muslim (ergo must be “radical” or in league with the “Muslim Brotherhood” without proof which is illogical and unproven), or 2) you’re just your basic internet troll looking to stir up shit with your unsupportable unproven and inane opinion.
Here let me put it to you simply in a way someone as simplistic as you might understand: What exactly do you perceive to be the problem with someone being a Muslim in America if they otherwise observe the laws of this country?
Do you think they are lesser, or should be treated as lesser under the laws of this nation, than say a Christian in this country? Or a Jew? Or an atheist? Or a Catholic?
You are aware that the laws of this country, including the First Amendment to the US Constitution, guarantees that all people are free to practice whatever religious faith (or no faith at all) as their conscience dictates without favor or disfavor by the US government unless that individual otherwise violates some state or federal law in practicing his or her religion?
So I ask you again, dogwhistle bigot, how is it my “agenda” or “propaganda” to take issue with you insinuating, inferring or dog whistling that somehow it is inappropriate for someone to be a Muslim in this country and be involved in politics at whatever level of office?
Would you like there to be religious tests for political office in this country, also forbidden by the US Constitution, or that only non-Muslims can hold political office or that only non-Muslims should be viewed by all Americans as “legitimate” if they are elected to office? If so good luck with that. Never going to happen.
If you think it is okay to discriminate or think of people as lesser or lesser Americans because of the religious faith they adhere to, you better think long and hard about that given the demographics of this country. Because Republicans and Donald Trump, and the US Constitution, may not always be there to protect your chosen religious affiliation someday in the future because of someone with a wrong-minded “agenda” or discriminatory intent in their heart against whichever faith you might belong to.
Did you really just say a decent hard-working politician wow you people are much stupider than I could ever imagine!
Two Jewish Senators, Chuck Schumer and Bernie Sanders, support Ellison for the DNC chairmanship.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/11/11/1596607/-Chuck-Schumer-joins-Bernie-Sanders-in-supporting-Keith-Ellison-for-DNC-chair
Oh he’s the perfect fit in my book! He’s identical to Hillary the Republicans and the populace movement will eat his ass alive! Should be a great show!
‘He’s identical to Hilary’ wow, this whole Politics and Ideology stuff goes right over your head doesn’t it. Do you read these articles or are you just here for the lols
Yea, Schumer is pretty much like Clinton.
Meanwhile: Trump: I’m ‘Fine’ With Gay Marriage
Relieving, since some of his supporters were apparently calling people “adulteresses” for their bisexuality.
Kind of OT but a high SAT score sure seemed to go a lot farther back then…
And when rich athletes can speak to a reality that should be right in every Democratic Party politician’s face, without understanding it or acting on it, then we’ve got real problems with our party:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/nov/14/doug-baldwin-seattle-seahawks-donald-trump-commments
Wow. I think I’ll fly to Seattle and hang around the stadium until I can shake this man’s hand.
That is heartening. Thanks for sharing it.
And this is an even more thought provoking article from Seth Ackerman posted at Jacobin.
A Blueprint For A New Party
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/11/bernie-sanders-democratic-labor-party-ackerman/
No sense in blockquoting, too long and informative, just recommend reading it all for those interested.
Okay this section is a good hook for those interested:
And that just about sums up the problem with the Democratic Party.
And here’s another interesting read that sets forth, in analyzing and comparing two new books that are being discussed lately in some threads, the complexity of what we are really up against.
https://newrepublic.com/article/136328/red-state-blues
It sure does. Funny how neither capitalism or democracy works well trickling down. Well, works well for the most of us, that is.
Gee golly gosh, this was totally predictable:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/can-clinton-and-trump-be-friends-again-230947
No me personally, I don’t care much what politicians say, and more what they do. But I didn’t know former Sec. of State Clinton was inclined to be friendly with “pussy grabbing”, forced kissing pervs who go into beauty pageant contestant changing rooms to ogle teenagers. But hey that’s just me.
But you can see why regular folks don’t put much stock or faith in any principles that politicians espouse, because they don’t really have any except to the degree it is politically expedient. Well most like the Clintons or Trump don’t have any, but I suppose there some others who do and I can think of a few names off the top of my head.
Normalizing Her Drumpf proceeds apace. A fucking rapid pace.
It’s all theater. They’re on the same side, really. The ruling class.
‘They’re good people,’ Trump says of the Clintons in ’60 Minutes’ interview
Yep I watched all of it last night.
Yeppers. Bill Clinton and Trumpster play golf together. Chelsea and Ivanka are besties. Ivanka, btw, is her father’s top go-to for running his biz empire, despite all his misogyny. Chelsea, otoh–what does she do? Collect $$, reap career help from mom n dad. Ugh to both.
Welll, she did stay married to Bill.The pussy-grabber in chief.
Asked in the late 1990s by Newsweek what he talked about on the golf course with Bill Clinton, Vernon Jordan, Clinton’s chief fixer–deployed to deal with Lewinsky–replied: “We talk pussy.”
I am no fan of Katy Perry for her plagiarism, her dissing of Taylor Swift, and her false feminism*, to say nothing of her backing of Hillary Clinton. Yet, Katy Perry (and Taylor) are more honest than Hillary Clinton. Perry told Taylor quite bluntly that they were enemies. Their feud has resulted in quite a few articles, and it’s unlikely that they will reconcile. Trump said far worse about Clinton (and vice versa), and now it appears that they will happily get back together? This goes beyond just loyalty to the system…this is crazy. It’s ironic that the much-maligned entertainment industry shows more honest character than politicians.
* What sort of feminist would have a song where a man on the bridge states, “I’m gonna disrobe you/ Then I’m gonna probe you/ See, I abducted you/ So I tell you what to do” and not portray it as a negative?
Ralph Ellison: the best possible Democratic leader at the worst possible time.
But I don’t see any coverage of the struggle for control of the Democratic Party going on right now, here at the Intercept. Just an attack on Schumer, who, perhaps coincidentally, is backing Ralph Ellison.
What’s up Intercept, are you backing the corporate Clintonites even after the election? Why no mention of Ralph Ellison? Owner’s orders? What’s this all about, really?
Why no mention of Ralph Ellison?
Because he’s the Invisible Man.
Claude Rains was the invisible man.
I heard Ralph is backing Keith, but it’s still in the rumor stage.
keith? ellison
So who’s Keith Schumer? Boy, this is confusing.
This may just turn out to be one of the best threads ever. By the way, where’s Waldo?
Schumer is alternatively known as the senator (D) Wall St and the senator (D) Israel here in New York State. He certainly doesn’t represent the people of New York in the Senate.
When I think of Chuck Schumer, I think of this: black hole, black hole, black hole. Yes, I’m that encouraged by him. I think Obama modelled himself after Chuckie, but Chuck doesn’t have the bland charisma Obama has. Lucky us, Schumer has had to remain behind the scenes while becoming one of the most powerful senators in the 21st Century.
Schumer did have an alliance of sorts with Paul Craig Roberts which pushed that point that India and China had certain advantages which went against the classical precepts of trade in which both countries gained. It involved the concept of comparative advantage. Not sure what Schumers views are now. Paul Craig Roberts has become a major anti-imperialist writer.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/06/opinion/second-thoughts-on-free-trade.html?_r=0
Nytime links get flushed down the toilet, where they belong. Iraq War 2003, that’s the NYTimes. Clinton propaganda on Russia 2016 for a new Cold War, that’s the NYTimes. PR rag. Pravda 2.0. Do not reference that trash.
Schumer possesses that rare ability to arouse utter contempt from both the right and the left. Surely we can find someone whose turn has not come, but actually earns a shot at the job.
How much more could a person embody a Republican than Schumer whom will supposedly be leading the Democrats?
Does it drive anyone else crazy to hear people complaining about Democrats or Republicans, and Democrats complaining about Republicans or vice versa?
All the related conversations spouting out from the corporate media, and the likes of the most inane human beings on the planet that being talk radio host morons, just serve as a distraction in order that we do not focus on the psychopaths that have bought all the public non-servants so very long ago.
Yes, the stupid tribalism is on full bore, and I reckon the duopoly putting on this theater of opposition is laughing at us all.
If Bernie were the benchmark of what is a Democrat, Schumer would rate the label Depublican. But then again, Hillary would rate the label Demublican on the campaign trail (with a track record of being a Depublican, too, only her e being from the Democrat side).
*I’m using Reagan as the benchmark of what is a Republican in this, and that would rate Trump a label of Recist, given he just made someone who, ironically, by being one step closer to Facism than Trump, rates the label Racist his chief of staff.
Huh what? Are you saying Reince Priebus is more racist then Trump? Why?? Priebus is the only moderate, normal, sane person that Trump has appointed to a top office.
Since I don’t think Trump will be doing any actual governing, this matters quite a bit.
Trump will be a figurehead who pops in from time to time to stir shit up. He never wanted to be prez, for eff’s sake. Now he has to move to lame-o DC and hang out with boring, unattractive, low-energy people. Sad! Major inconvenience.
Reince is the guy who can keep him from getting too crazy. Ain’t gonna be b.s. man Newtie G or crazy-ass Rudie G.
nothing better for America than to have chuckie completely destroy the democratic potty. His rise like foam to the top will assure the 3rd party upset in 2020
*Fight this, petition for Bernie Sanders to be the next Senate Minority Leader* http://bernieforleader.com/ (up to 70,000 signatures)
Personally I think you missed an important one, Jon. Senator Schumer voted 9 years ago to help cover-up torture war crimes. Some might believe that makes him a war criminal, too.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20071106_a_vote_for_mukasey_is_a_vote_for_torture
it certainly makes you the friend and ally of war criminals.
And an accessory after the fact.
It will be rather a delicious dilemma for Trump if the ICC decides to try and finally gain credibility as something other than a court that only prosecutes the weakest and starts trying to prosecute Americans who have legal responsibility for the war crime of torture. Why? Because they’ll almost certainly issue arrest warrants for both Bush and Obama, as failure to prosecute is legally the same as ordering the torture. So the temptation to let someone prosecute Obama that can’t be said to be doing it on behalf of Trump, and hamstring the Bushes, might be bigger than the fear that letting ‘foreigners’ claim jurisdiction over American lawmakers wouldn’t play well with the Republican base.
wow.
“Charles Schumer and Dianne Feinstein voted for his confirmation as U.S. attorney general anyway. ”
chuckie and diane belong together, just not in America.
Well it looks like Prof. Loomis has finally pulled his head out of his ass. And it looks like he’s attracted some new commenters to weigh in.
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2016/11/union-decline-and-trumps-rise#comments
Maybe there’s hope yet. Lemieux and Campos seem like lost causes though.
It has been the concerted bipartisan Congressional/Executive branch policy of America’s elites to de-industrialize America’s heavy industry (as opposed to things like hi-tech) since at least about 1955. This is well documented as a function of “cold war” history and economic policy.
It didn’t have to be this way. Germany and Canada have been the objects of the same forces of globalization that the rest of the planet has, and yet, as a function of a conscious policy choices and laws, their elites have chosen to maintain a viable union base (saturation about 22% in Canada; 18-20% in Germany) that acts “more than as a collective bargaining machine, but as important political player for social, economical and also environmental subjects, especially also for labor market policy and professional education.”
There’s also a commenter called “ProgressiveLiberal” in Prof. Loomis’ piece entitled Jobs and Trump Votes earlier today or today if you’re willing or interested in looking, and he seems to understand that there a conscious policy choices that the Democratic Party could have fought for over the years (or now for that matter) that could yield some much better results for the American working class. They aren’t necessarily new ideas (or even policies), but many have never been exposed to them so in case you’re interested you can scroll back through last two days posts and find it.
Like I’ve always said, with exception of Prof. Loomis there isn’t much worth bothering with over there, but as a Labor historian he generally speaking, most “gets it” and is worth supporting at least with eyeballs and clicks, if not trying to help elevate his reach in mainstream/alt media
sorry for typos all over in that one
One reason for the continued demise of organized labor in US especially since after WW2 is that most International Union leaders went to bed with the CIA (successor to OSS) in their covert activities to overthrow governments, arrest, torture and outright murder organized labor activists in foreign countries with a promise that American labor would bet a seat at the international table. Well, that never happened…….and we have what we have today.
Fair enough. Another example of it being a conscious policy choice rather than inevitable, and precisely my point.
trade agreements that destroy unions pretty much paints the whole picture of the party of betrayers and traitors. That and clinton GLOBAL initiative.
A good one yesterday(or today?)the NYTs says advertisers will pull their ads from non factual web site news outlets.
Ho ho ho .
Hear, hear, damn it! It takes some deep denial, I mean serious pathological obliviousness, even to consider this man for the position. The self-unawareness of Schumer, specifically, and the establishment Democrats, generally, is cartoonishly absurd. THIS is why they lost the presidency, and the House, and the Senate, and ultimately, the Supreme Court. But no, you keep on digging, democrats; keep digging. Look, if the party is serious about self-reflection and substantive reform, then it should start (and that’s all it would be, a start) with Sanders, not Schumer, becoming the minority leader. The party needs a polar realignment that shakes up its current (real/perceived) paradigm of showing contempt for constituents and devotion to donors. That…doesn’t…work…anymore.
Schumer is backing Sanders supporter Ralph Ellison over Clinton-style lobbyist Howard Dean to lead the DNC, that’s obviously a step in the right direction. Why leave that out of the discussion?
This outlet really ought to be doing some serious soul-searching over its over-the-top pro-Clinton coverage (i.e. the Robert Mackey no-comments Trumpdown report). Advocacy journalism vs. adversarial journalism, what’s your mandate now? Meanwhile, we have Obama threatening to allow open season on Dakota Access Pipeline protestors by militarized police forces (which is what his boss, Warren Buffett, with $6 billion invested, wants to see happen).
And yes, the candidate the Intercept backed, Hillary Clinton, was actually scarier than Donald Trump, as this short video explains:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUnaKqQmUpE
Sure, Trump will be very problematic and I don’t believe much of what he says – but the hands on the Doomsday Clock got moved back a few minutes from midnight, thanks to Hillary Clinton’s defeat. That’s why I felt a surge of relief when the election totals came in, not that I expect too many of my fellow Americans to really understand that, given the atrocious coverage of foreign policy issues over the past few years by the dishonest corrupt media in this country.
Yo, I’m a new commentator (although I’ve been reading the Intercept for a while). From what I’ve seen, you’re one of the best posters on this site; may I ask how many people you’ve managed to convince Hillary as being a worse candidate (of which I agree) than Trump? I’m just curious…and looking to renew a little of my faith.
We need to get these people out of Washington. These wolves in sheep’s clothing have done more damage to the liberal agenda than the opposition. It’s disgusting and they need to be exposed! We must get motivated and rise up to take back the destiny of this country from the elites on the left and right!
after reading this and thinking back, it is plausible that hellary lost the election because chuckie boy alone poisoned the entire party with his patronising of wallstreet thieves and corruption. maybe he led the bailout. maybe he promoted the criminal trade agreements. maybe he suggested the vote for invading iraq, libya, afganistan and syria. maybe he forced the coup in egypt. maybe he is the one with foreign ties who want american lives to be sacrificed. maybe he isnt American.
chuckie schumer may be the sole reason the dem party has one bad. the rot in the apple. devil in disguise.
“Dem bones, Dem bones, Dem dry bones…”
Jeez, put the thing out of our misery already. The Democratic Party and the Republican Party can fuck off.
Yep Sen. Schumer is precisely and example of what is fundamentally wrong with the Democratic Party. And I’ve been saying for years that unless the rank and file want to start making electoral examples of the top echelons of Democrats to let them know who they really work for (just like the Teahadis), then expect to get more of the same.
The rot starts at the top.
The only things Chuck Schumer has ever given a shit about is Chuck Schumer, Israel and his Wall Street “constituents” who finance his campaigns. That has to change. And it would be great if his NYC voters would figure that out and make an example of him next time he’s up for re-election. Chances of him changing his political or economic stripes is zero.
The fish rots from the head.
Hellooooooo Democrats!
Thanks for the article! The Swamp has to be drained of ALL snakes and alligators.
While I agree with the premise, I think it is excellent news. And, it once again ratifies the wisdom of my decision to donate to and vote for the Green Party candidate. Keep it up, democrats! You are helping build alternative parties, something this country desperately needs.
Well. . . I don’t know if they’re helping to build alternatives yet, but they are certainly making all the predictable moves and choices that are likely to lead to their further disintegration. And nature abhors a vacuum. ;^)
Good summary, Jon! And those are Chuck’s best attributes.
NAFTA was single biggest factor that pretty much forced Mexican farmers to moved to the US for work. NAFTA allowed US agricultural products to flood the Mexican market. Those products like corn are subsidized in the US so they are competitive on the world market. The result was millions of small farmers in Mexico could not compete with US subsidized corn. Many small towns in Mexico were turned into ghost towns and farming families could not sell their corn. They then came to the US because the number of new job seekers was larger than the number of jobs in Mexico.
We have seen this occur world wide. US subsidized cotton tanking the market in west Africa and again in India. In both cases thousand of suicides have been attributed to US subsidized crops bankrupting small farmers.
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/11/24/what-weve-learned-from-nafta/under-nafta-mexico-suffered-and-the-united-states-felt-its-pain
Yup, NAFTA screwed both the US and Mexico hard, just in different “Holes” so to speak.
the subsidy of corn by the US is pure hypocrisy. The Dumb&Dumbers of the USG complain of such things when other govs do it (steal, jets, etc) and as this crap causes price hikes in home grown products in the US AND the US taxpayer pays that subsidy as if to shoot themselves.
WDC has become a mutant abomination from hell for thieving wallstreet pigs.
This is an excellent point – the pathetic part is, the U.S. got this illegal immigrant problem because it won too GOOD a deal with Mexico. I wonder how good Trump will be at getting a worse deal with Mexico.
Subsidizing corn is pretty awful for Americans too – it means subsidizing high fructose corn syrup, more than anything. A smart government would keep its money to offer interest-free loans for the planting of olive plantations and such crops where it takes capital to adjust to healthier demand, to pioneer mechanical harvesting practices for crops we’ve lost to cheap labor abroad like saffron, and to make healthy food choices like berries more affordable. Rather than, say, taxing the subsidized HFCS on a town by town basis if people decide to pour it into water and sell it as a drink, which is the kind of policy only an idiot would think up.
So, really, it got both the US and Mexico in the corn hole.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZsVP2WoE9E
Clinton funeral at Whitehouse.
Shocking!
This thread smells like an apartment in…? Ok. It smells like cabbage and shadenfreude. That’s it!
Chuckie reminds me of netanyahu. He has that viper eyes look, ready to strike and bite as he blathers on with pretentious authority. Head goes down, eyes go up, and then the slight gaping of the mouth. Definitely the joker of the deck.
Typical. Impressionistic judgementalism, Shumer and Dean et al are pols for sure, but they have a lot of intelligence and skill. Just like Trump with his appointments, you’ll see a need to retain some people who know where the Kleenex and toilet paper are stored.
Quite a list. A gem of an article Mr. Schwarz.
Great job.
It’s like the Democrats want to become a permanent minority party.
Another reason he’s the worst? He actually believes that Israel’s Gaza Blockade is a great thing. Those damn Palestinians have to be kept in their place.
His exact words were: … And to me, since the Palestinians in Gaza elected Hamas, while certainly there should be humanitarian aid and people not starving to death, to strangle them economically until they see that’s not the way to go, makes sense.” A true democrat.
He is. As long as the Palestinians vote ‘Schumer’s way’ he’s perfectly fine with it.
“A true democrat”
Exactly, and the DNC is like our version of the Palestinian Authority. What a tool.
To even use the phrase “people not starving to death” is about as sadistic as it comes. How about international law Chuckie? Just another candidate for the Ninth Circle of Hell…
he secretly believes he’s god’s chosen one. His reward should be as a traffic court judge for eternity.
Goodbye DP
Ellison supported Bernie.
Without profound change the DP is dead.
This is not a foregone conclusion. If Keith Ellison is elected to chair the DNC and has other ideas …
Just another one of the (2%). 3 out of 9 SC Justices are from the 2% and Tom the Toad Obomber wanted to make it 4. Oh wait, you can’t bring up the 2%. Trump is looking better and better. He has been screwed by the banksters and he has screwed back; I hope he hates them enough to take them on. Last time the corporations brought it back at 5%; Trump wants 10%, hope he sticks to his guns or next time the people may stick to their guns. Did they stop building pitchforks in Amerika
America actually got lucky that crazy hellary lost because her judges would have helped her global criminal initiative and foreign wars forever.
Check out the banks on this Trump win. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-26/trump-hotel-in-toronto-nears-auction-after-default-by-developer
Winning with Oligarchs! Yay! Like he doesn’t have some serious issues.
Protesters occupy Senate Dem’s office, blast Wall St. ties
stupid DNC. putting a con like chuckie as senate leader is like re-nominating hellary. Have they no shame?
Their hearts are in the right place, but it’s a strategic error to attempt to reform or correct the Democrats. They are a lost cause, the near right wing of the One Party.
This system cannot and will not be tweaked or adjusted. It must be replaced, and needs to be substantially weakened before that is even remotely possible.
Let them eat each other.
I wonder if Trump will publicly thank Schumer for Weiner-gate.
Trump will no doubt make him Secretary of Wall St.
I freud-read that as “savagely explaining”
So did I.
He’s among the worst. My ex in NYC had lunch with him 20 years ago and said that Schumer told him about his perfect SAT score within the first few minutes. It’s either a lie or a strange compulsion with its own pathology. Like someone bragging about their IQ. Who cares?
that’s interesting. He has an inflated sense of self importance that oozes from his self inserted belief of being better than others. Him, netanyahu and kissinger, triplets.
“During a Senate hearing, Schumer explained that “it’s easy to sit back in the armchair and say that torture can never be used. But when you’re in the foxhole, it’s a very different deal.””
says the man who’s never been in a fox-hole in his life.
what a pos.
By the way, they torture in foxholes???
When the EU ruled Ireland could not just ignore corporate taxes due, the multi-national corporations that had been evading American taxes panicked. Now they are on their knees begging for repatriation of their loot so they can get it out of Europe. …..of course they want to pay two – three cents on the dollar. Schumer and McConnell will gladly accommodate them. A few years ago, I made small arithmetic mistake on my US taxes. Shortly afterwards, I got an enforcement letter from the IRS. Always said I should have robbed a bank like Schumer’s wall street pals. They got a bonus for it!!
Left out that Schumer comes across about as authentic as Hillary
And the 800-pound elephant: He’s a New York Jew with a thick accent.
That’s fine with me, even music to my ears.
But I can only imagine how he plays out in the hinterland, particularly in comparison to Trump. Same town, but so very different images.
Still, he’s earned his way to lead a party beholden to Wall Street and AIPAC.
Who knows? Maybe he’ll surprise us.
And if we are being asked to give Trump a chance, we should give Chuck the same benefit of the doubt.
At the least, he could spur on the push for a truly progressive third party.
(benefit of the doubt being a meaningless phrase when there isn’t one)
not surprise, shock, the shock of unadulterated arrogance
There’s an old Washington saying about survival …
… Never – NEVER – get between Chuckles Schumer and a TV camera …
I’ve heard that one before. A neighbor of mine worked in his PR department for a while before burning out.
So… hows about you finish your rough draft that was posted here as an article. Why is he the worst possible leader at the worst possible time? You never bother to get into that. You talk about all the shitty things he’s done but you don’t really get into what is going to make him the “worst.” What is he going to do that you find so frightening? I’m not pro or con Schumer. I just think you should back up a big, bold, click-bait headline with some reasoned argument.
Try reading the article and opening the links and reading what those contain.
If you’re not picking up on the correlation between Wall St.’s finest boy in Congress, and “the worst possible time”… you might not know what time it is. Or what zone you’re in. Bettasksumbudy.
He’s an asshole, but we seem to have an affinity for assholes here in NY.
As soon as Schumar became a Senator, he turned his back on Progressives. He actually was fairly liberal 20 years ago. But money and power, well, they can turn anyone into a Republican.
No, he wasn’t liberal 20 years ago. He and the Cintons were at the forefront in pushing the Democratic Party as far right as possible, to kill off the parts of the New Deal that survived the Reagan years.
Please Please
Highlight this as often and as hard as you can.
Schumer has already bragged that he is working with members “across the isle” to repatriate the off shore tax money in tax havens for cents on the dollar. This even though we staged the same coup years ago and swore it would be a one – of. He would see to that.
When I saw him with Ellison and Sanders, my heart sank. This putz, my senator has the chuztpah to stand there. This the guy who through out his career cowtowed to Wall St and voted with Conservatives to appoint and confirm right wing Justices and cabinet officals all in the name of “bipartisanship”.
Please the guy should be impeached for impersonating a US Senator
Schumer has already bragged that he is working with members “across the isle” to repatriate the off shore tax money in tax havens for cents on the dollar.
That’s what you do when some company makes money overseas and you want them to spend it/reinvest it stateside.
Better not to drive them overseas in the first place, focus the taxes on the shareholders rather than the corporation itself so no matter where their HQ is it doesn’t matter. Raise cap gains, lower taxes for the corporate entities themselves, keep SOME taxes on the corporate entities because you can’t easily charge a cap-gains tax to a shareholder that’s not a US citizen or resident so their cut has to be taken a step earlier.
So, the premise here is that the Democratic Party is worth saving? Nah. Not really worth it.
Bingo.
neither of the major parties is worth saving! Both need to be destroyed and replaced with a people’s party.
You’ve just pointed out why his support of Keith Ellison to head the DNC is nothing but lip service.