On the same day news broke that President-elect Donald Trump had agreed to pay a $25 million settlement resulting from fraud cases related to Trump University, top adviser Newt Gingrich was giving lobbying advice at a Dallas event hosted by the lobbying group representing America’s for-profit college industry.
One day earlier, on November 17, Trump had released a new ethics pledge for members of his transition team, ostensibly intended to limit the role of lobbyists. (It doesn’t really.)
Gingrich, the former GOP House speaker, is a vice chair of the transition team and has said he intends to be President Trump’s “general planner.” But on that Friday, there he was in Dallas, speaking at an event hosted by the Career Education Colleges and Universities (CECU), the leading trade association group representing for-profit colleges.
CECU, which was until recently known as Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities (APSCU), is known for having gone to war with the Obama administration over its attempt to regulate the vast flow of federal money that goes to for-profit colleges. In that lobbying war, it tapped many former lawmakers, including former Republican Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott. The Dallas event was planned to unveil the launch of a campaign to rebrand the association as focused on creating a new generation of “career professionals” educated by for-profit colleges.
Trump University — basically a series of haphazardly assembled seminars offering to teach students Trump’s investment skills — was not a member of CECU, but it utilized many of the same unseemly practices as other for-profit schools, including aggressively selling classes with little to no substance and leaving students with mountains of debt but few useful skills.
In Dallas, Gingrich talked about the election’s results and praised Trump’s victory. But he also offered advice to attendees about how to lobby for the interests of the industry. For example, Gingrich suggested they weaponize their student bodies to tout the benefits of “career education,” a phrase the industry uses to claim that it is preparing its student for work. Dallas News reporter Sanya Mansoor, who attended, provided The Intercept with an audio recording.
“Now if we had 20 percent of your alumni self-aware and going to their congressman’s town hall meeting to say ‘Let me tell you how career education changed my life,’ we’d [inaudible] a different country,” he said. “I mean, everybody expects you to say, ‘Hey, my school’s great.’ But, your students can validate you. Your students can say, ‘This is how my life was improved. This is why it worked for me. This is why I’d recommend it.’ And it’s vital that we create a student and alumni-centered approach particularly in reaching out to the Black Caucus and the Latino Caucus so that they feel they’re responding to the human, not the financial, side of this.”
Listen to it:
CECU has been in free fall over the past few years, shedding members, funding, and staff. The entire for-profit college industry itself has come under increasing scrutiny, with one recent National Bureau of Economic Research paper released earlier this year concluding that students who attended for-profit colleges to earn vocational certificates on average earned $900 less annually after attendance than they did before.
A spokesperson for CECU did not respond to an inquiry from The Intercept about whether Gingrich was compensated for his appearance in Dallas. Gingrich previously served as the keynote speaker at their 2015 annual meeting.
Top photo: Newt Gingrich waves to delegates at the Republican National Convention in July.
You used “Trump” twice in your headline.
Is Mackey the editor now?
Trump and the odious Gingrich are lately joined at the hip. Now you know. And, is that Calista there? ‘Bout time for a new wife, eh Newt?
Trump U was a real estate seminar, not a for-profit university. Big difference.
Gingrich is still a gutless shill, though.
Non-issue. Try again.
This is one reason why I am glad to have The Intercept reporting things. It also makes me concerned for the state of education, after knowing people who lost out after the massive closings of ITT Tech. (And given the ties of the new Education Secretary to the Religious Right, expect things like TRACS to get promoted…)
More fake news from the Intercept, considering how they failed to dive this deep regarding the Clinton Foundation and its pay-to-play mentality. Notice how liberals are treating Trump to a completely different standard in how they investigate him, evaluate him, and cover for him.
What’s fake, Jamie? Was Gingrich not there? What?
It is fake news because it is a lie of omission. It is only designed to manipulate and not inform. The Candidate that the Intercept supported was never reported by the Intercept for her ties to for-profit education:
“Alec Ross, who is promoting a new book, worked for the 2008 Obama campaign and then served in the State Department as Hillary Clinton’s Senior Advisor on Innovation. Ross now serves on the advisory board of Leeds Equity Partners, which is run by APSCU board member, former EDMC board member, and long-time for-profit college investor Jeffrey Leeds; another board member is former Bill Clinton White House chief of staff Thomas F. “Mac” McLarty.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/davidhalperin/for-profit-college-indust_b_10308114.html
Not does the above fake news article state Hillary Clinton’s financial entanglements with this industry:
“But the Democratic front-runner also has an array of connections to the for-profit education industry that some observers have said raise questions about the type of influence for-profit colleges would enjoy under a Clinton administration.
Most prominent are Clinton’s ties to the global for-profit education behemoth Laureate Education, for whom her husband, Bill Clinton, worked directly, earning $16.5 million between 2010 and 2014. ”
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/04/18/hillary-clintons-ties-profit-education-companies
Newt wishes he got 16.4 million!
Fake News = Intercept + Double Standards + Billionaire Owner + Lies of Omission.
Your definition of ‘fake news” is news you don’t want to hear and or you disagree with, even though you state nothing within that “fake news” which is fake?
To feign concern regarding for-profit universities, yet hiding real material facts that would embarrass your political party of choice is disingenuous. If the author really wished to expose politicians that support this industry, Bill Clinton’s 16.5 million take would be the news, as would Obama’s Education Secretary Arne Duncan and his for profit charter school tour with none else but Newt Gingrich and Al Sharpton. This was followed up by Obama pumping billions into charter schools and closing public schools:
http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/send-clowns-3-stooges-gingrich-sharpton-duncan-hit-road-corporate-%E2%80%9Cschool-reform%E2%80%9D
Black Agenda Report is real news, in that when they claim concern regarding an issue they report about politicians from all parties. They don’t hide 16 million dollar payments and then fret about some consulting fees.
“The greatest lie is the lie of omission”
– George Orwell
So then you think that a news story which doesn’t include every other news story at the same time withing that news story is “fake news.”
You should read The Intercept rather than pretend that you do if you want make claims about “party of choice.”:
The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny.
You don’t really read the Intercept, do you? You should.
Why? It is not gospel, is it?
Why? Because the “Jamie” commenter is commenting on it and about it falsely without having read it. A good reason to read something is because you might want to know what it said, especially if you’re going to comment about it. That’s probably where to begin. Don’t you think?
? Why should this story include the Clinton Foundation?