Top-secret British surveillance operations targeted the director of the World Trade Organization, several multinational corporations, a top French businessman, and heads of state across Africa, according to a new series of reports by Le Monde.
On Tuesday, the French newspaper began publishing the revelations, which include a wide range of previously undisclosed details about British covert activities across the world. The reports were produced in partnership with The Intercept and are based on documents provided by the National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden.
The series of stories focuses largely on the controversial work of the U.K.’s electronic surveillance agency Government Communications Headquarters, or GCHQ. According to Le Monde, in March 2009, the British agency spied on Pascal Lamy, then the head of the World Trade Organization and member of the French socialist party. Between 2008 and 2009, it also targeted Octave Klaba, the founder of the French company OVH, one of Europe’s largest internet hosting companies; Emmanuel Glimet, a French trade and economy official; phone lines at the French ministry of foreign affairs; and several multinational French corporations, including the energy company Areva, oil giant Total, and the defense conglomerate Thalès.
Beyond France, the disclosures highlight the U.K.’s extensive spying operations across Africa. In 20 countries across the continent, GCHQ monitored current and former heads of state, prime ministers, diplomats, military and intelligence chiefs, as well as leading figures in the business and finance industry, Le Monde reports. Among those who were subject to the surveillance, which involved intercepting communications as they were being beamed between satellites, was a close British ally — Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki and his strategic advisers. Other targets included Nigeria’s President Umaru Yar’Adua and his private secretary; Ghana’s President John Kufuor; Sierra Leone’s leader Ernest Koroma; and the presidential palace in Luanda, Angola. Prominent business figures were also monitored, such as Nigerian billionaire Tony Elumelu, regarded as one of Africa’s richest and most influential men, and Chris Kirubi, a wealthy Kenyan businessman and radio-station owner who was described by Forbes in 2011 as the country’s “most flamboyant tycoon.”
But not all of the people on the surveillance lists were high-flying corporate and political elites. Le Monde reports that GCHQ spied on the employees of two major telecommunications companies — the South African firm MTN and Kuwait-based Zain. The agency focused in particular on “roaming managers” working for the companies in at least 15 African countries, including Gabon, Ivory Coast, Tunisia, Congo, and Mali. Roaming managers who work for cellphone companies organize partnerships between different carriers across the world, ensuring that when you travel overseas on vacation or a business trip you can use your phone to connect to a local network and make calls and receive messages.
Often, roaming managers handle sensitive technical documents about how different networks function — and this is what places them on the radar of both GCHQ and its close U.S. counterpart, the NSA. Such documents are of high value to the agencies, as they contain information that they can use to hack into networks and eavesdrop on communications. As The Intercept has previously reported, the NSA systematically monitors telco company employees’ emails with the explicit purpose of collecting roaming documents, which it describes as “necessary for targeting and exploitation.” In other words, roaming managers are not spied on because they are suspected of wrongdoing or because they are of political or economic interest; rather, they are merely viewed as a means to an end.
GCHQ declined to answer any questions from Le Monde, citing a long-standing policy not to comment on intelligence matters. A spokesperson for the agency claimed in a statement that its activities are all “authorised, necessary and proportionate” and “entirely compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.” The NSA said its activities complied with U.S. law and policy and declined to comment further.
Top photo: GCHQ Bude is a satellite ground station and eavesdropping center located on the North Cornwall coast, U.K.
Why did the commander of the U.S. Army Security Agency visit Cairo in the 1960s?
http://www.itemonline.com/opinion/x2112911426/Military-intelligence-Oxymoron-or-not
This is all the spying network is for. It obviously isn’t to stop terrorists as a) they fail miserably and b) they fund and encourage some of them anyway. They probably do a bit of spying about technology, but then MIT is in the USA anyway and 99% of the clever stuff is in the public domain enough that it is hardly Top Secret. Military stuff can be assessed using satellite imagery and insider knowledge – the Russians go to air shows with their latest stuff anyway. So what is left? There are all these bored Oxbridge twits sitting in that awful donut in the West Country with nothing to do, so best spy on businesses, governments and rival political groups. If I was Jeremy Corbin I’d develop a penchant for loud farting and hawking up lung oysters just because he must know that EVERY SINGLE THING he says gets spied on.
They can all carry on telling us it is completely necessary to save us all from some terrible fate that would inevitably happen if they were otherwise more gainfully and pleasantly employed inventing puzzles and games and writing better software than godawful Microsoft, when in fact they are far worse than anything we had imagined. I hate them with all the bile I can muster. I try to imagine them as sweet children and wonder when they transitioned into spying arseholes that chose a life of insanity on the fringes of humanity, sucking Yankee cock for their salary and deluding themselves that they are elite and gifted. Must take a mighty effort to overcome their powers of reasoning to justify their choice. All one big Happy Family. Except for General Flynn. And the whistle-blowers. And the Brits who secretly feel the Americans have stolen our sovereignty. And the Yanks who are tired of being bullied by all the corporate-political arseholes above them. And the…
Unfortunately Le Monde charges 2 euros to access the article.
“L’accès à la totalité de l’article est protégé”
I’m not too sure that helps the diffusion.
Is there any info on spying on Burundi ?
When I was a kid , circa 1950 , it was not Russia ! It was the COMMUNISTS !
Down there , on the lower east side , 9th Street between C&D Aves , Nixon gained his political boots by electrocuting a man and his wife for espionage .
He found the secrets to the A-Bomb in a pumpkin behind the apartment house . The rat bastard had no feelings . He electrocuted them both .
I was living at 637 E 9th at the time ,, little did I know . The McCarthy years were underway . Cost me my weekend job as proofboy for the Daily Worker .
RAT-BASTARDS ,,,,,,all we were trying to do was make a living and they come in and start that fear shit !
they were the Rosenbergs . can’t recall the man’s name , Julius , George ? but I remember Ethel . How anyone would want to harm Ethel is still incomprehensible to me . Shit man,, this world STINKS !!
His name was Julius.
We are told the documents are “safely stored by The Intercept” and none are presented. You only get 15 free articles at LeMonde, and this looks like quite a rack of teasers. Esp. the intelligence war with Octave Klaba. Oh my why would NSA/GCHQ want to mess with him? Please, lets get on with it.
the future of radio belongs to us –
indyradio.info
Take this one step further. Since GCHQ works with NSA and others, this means that they monitor ALL communications of politicians? NSA has all of Trump’s communications up to this point. Wanna know his secrets? Hack it or leak it.
Of course, these documents are of so little value they haven’t bothered to publish them for the 3+ years they have had them – they being a small group of white men representing the establishment press – until now, just not newsworthy until today. Sharing is so so nice.
U.K. Intelligence Called Israel ‘True Threat’ to Middle East
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.757541
British intelligence spied on Israeli diplomats, Snowden leaks reveal
Der Spiegel: Germany spying on Israeli Prime Minister’s Office
U.K.-U.S. spy operations also reportedly targeted Israeli missile project
According to Le Monde, the GCHQ collected information on Israeli diplomats, including a person described by the newspaper as the second-highest ranking official in the Israeli foreign ministry. That person was not named.
The British also spied on the Palestinian Authority, the report said.
Email correspondence belonging to the Israeli ambassadors to Nigeria and Kenya was also the subject of British intelligence-gathering efforts as was Ophir Optronics, a firm deemed to be tied to the Israeli defense establishment that specializes in fiber optics, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem’s Racah Institute of Physics.
According to Le Monde, the GCHQ kept track of the phones of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas as well as that of his two sons, Yasser and Tarek Abbas, on December 9, 2008. Noting that these interceptions occurred three weeks before Israel’s military offensive in Gaza in January 2009, the newspaper suggests they may have served to aid Israel to prepare for the operation.
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.757541
Let me see, 193 nations, each wants to spy on the head of state of all the others (and more) if they can = more than 37 000 bits of spying.
The interesting thing is that all these years after Snowden revealed this stuff, the journalists of the world seem not to have made much of a dent on the big picture. What does that say about the untapped opportunities for investigative journalism?
Hmmm. A foreign-intelligence service has been “caught” red-handed doing what it was created to do: collect intelligence on foreign targets.
How shocking and newsworthy.
Your statement, which you think is so clever, has been amde debunked time and time again for the last 3+ years.
So it suprises and shocks you that foreign-intelligence services target foreign governments? That’s weird.
Hmmm. A commenter commenting on a democratic nation’s intelligence services has been “caught” red-handed doing what too many commenter’s do: ignoring the fact that citizens of these and many other democracies have lost fundamental human rights (privacy, et al), all in order to continue feeding the “fake news” narrative that these “protectors of our freedom” agencies are actually about protecting individual liberties – when they are almost exclusively about protecting big corporate interests. aka, the almighty dollar.
How not-shocking, and un-newsworthy.
Amen, Sillyputty. 6 corporate overlords here owning the media, led us to the results of the 2016 primaries and election, while making a tidy profit. Next Occupy movement is to shut them off and support the best alternative progressive media sources. We need to build and support alternatives. We need to OCCUPY THE MEDIA! https://youtu.be/d2xnms84N3c
So, in a democracy, foreign-intelligence services should never be used to spy on foreign targets? What should they be used for, then?
It’s not what they should be ‘used for’ that’s the real concern, it’s what they shouldn’t be allowed to do; mostly this is with regards to stripping away the protections that citizens are accorded in a democracy – here in the US that would be, at minimum, those protections found in the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Agreed.
Such concerns are certainly relevant when it comes to real scandals such as PRISM. The executive branch giving certain authorities to the NSA to collect American metadata is a perfect example.
However, the mission of foreign-intelligence service is to collect foreign intelligence. The subject of the above article is an example of this. It is not an example of a potential civil liberties violation; it it not even about the NSA, it is about GCHQ.
It’s not shocking, but it represents a change, bringing transparency to spying operations. Spies may take a while to become accustomed to the new public scrutiny, as they traditionally tended to operate with very little oversight. So they might not like it at first.
However, Governments no longer have unlimited resources and must offset some of their expenses with user fees. So British companies given information about a French competitor’s plans in Africa, should pay a fee proportional to the financial benefit they receive. In the long run, this may help to direct more money into spying, benefitting everyone involved.
“However, Governments no longer have unlimited resources and must offset some of their expenses with user fees. ”
TAXES ?
The rich stash their money in tax havens. And the poor, no matter how hard you squeeze them, seem to be limited in their ability to pay taxes.
It is newsworthy, and here’s a simple test to prove it: Suppose China were found to have been spying on the head of the World Trade Organization. Would that not be newsworthy in your view?
What if they were found to have been spying on the rulers of African countries?
The UK is a historically imperialistic country. Of course it matters that they treat certain countries as if they were colonies still.
So would it be shocking and surprising to you if China did this? They probably already do. Is there a specific law against this?
A foreign-intelligence service, of course, is set up to collect foreign intelligence. And the whole point of laws like FISA is to regulate and restrict the ways that American intelligence agencies (i.e. FBI and NSA) can collect intelligence on other Americans.
Also, Fourth Amendment protections are applicable to US citizens; hence the NSA’s use of FISC warrants, minimization procedures, and restricted-access databases. Does the Constitution say this applies to foreigners? No.
Again: a foreign-intelligence service is used to collect foreign intelligence. Do you think China spying on the WTO or African countries (which they almost certainly are) would be immoral or illegal?
Well, I guess now, if an agency, like GCHA, steals information – it’s spying. If an agency steals information and publishes it, like Wikileaks, it’s transparency. Makes one wonder about right to privacy in both cases.
RED ALERT! THEY WANNA WAR!
OT? same ejits, different country.
hellary clinton just lost the recount try. But the predatory thieving conjobbers suporting her are taking another go at the “russia did it” except this time the fools are getting GCHQ & MI6 to see if they can con the Brits. Probably in co-operation with the thieving EU banksters in need of that war economy!
here it is –
Russia fueling ‘unprecedented’ terror threat against UK: MI6 chief
http://presstv.com/Detail/2016/12/08/497032/UK-Russia-Syria-MI6-terrorism-Younger
Again you are on it! CrookdClintonsObamaNaftaTpp like the people vote– “i see all americans” but ONLY work assiduously for the WS secret speechers!
Have to admire russian patience!
sure. As i pondered the situation, the dots are connecting to a dead YINON PLAN. And i am guessing it has netanyahu and his merry band of likuds shatting bricks upon realising that friends of Russia will be their neighbor. Back to the drawering board.
Look ,,
Despite what HIS-Tory says , George Washington did not fight the Brits . He was a landowner that complained about the rent he was paying . He never went to war . The battle of Bunker Hill was fought by local landowners who complained about the rent . Old George was nothing more than a pontificating , pius , putz , who was a cousin of King George .
End of story .
Hey CAPITALISM vs COMMUNISM
INDIVIDUALISM vs SOCIALISM
Communism ,, the idea every worker does their best for the community
and
Socialism ,, the idea of group togetherness
They just don’t fit with Capitalism and Individualism , right ?
When I was a kid , circa 1950 , it was not Russia ! It was the COMMUNISTS !
Down there , on the lower east side , 9th Street between C&D Aves , Nixon gained his political boots by electrocuting a man and his wife for espionage .
He found the secrets to the A-Bomb in a pumpkin behind the apartment house . The rat bastard had no feelings . He electrocuted them both .
I was living at 637 E 9th at the time ,, little did I know . The McCarthy years were underway . Cost me my weekend job as proofboy for the Daily Worker .
RAT-BASTARDS ,,,,,,all we were trying to do was make a living and they come in and start that fear shit !
GCHQ always gives the same “stuck record” answer when asked to comment on articles like this (that its actions are “authorised, necessary and proportionate…”). So perhaps the intercept could set up a special “GCHQ answer” page and just LINK to it every time. That way you could save giving airtime to their self-serving bluster.
On one hand, Britain has profound concern for the welfare of the African states. On the other hand, a lot of people are nosing about Africa, trying to secure lucrative deals for natural resources and Britain wouldn’t want to miss out. So it is only natural that Britain would want to spy on Africa. I believe that Africans have fond memories of Britain as a colonial power, so I’d be surprised if they raise any objections.
Hey Benito, While I agree with most of your comment above, I found myself stuck on “… fond memories of Britain as a colonial power…”. Exactly which Africans have you been talking with to arrive at this conclusion?
I propose a more probable reason why you may not hear any objections coming out of Africa. It could simply be that they have more glaringly obvious issues that they are still engaged in. The resources that the rest of the world seem to be so interested in getting their hands on, for one (as you pointed out).
You will be surprised then .
[Tunisia]
Now this is Good old Benito sarcasm !!!
Luv Ya
Kudos to Le Monde and the Intercept! This is sensational.
Sensational? How?
The publicly known mission of GCHQ is to collect on foreign targets. Makign this a non-story, if an interesting one.
yes, if only Le Monde didn’t charge to read their articles.
During the colonial era, spies were deployed to safeguard the assets of empire.
Some things change in name only.
Centuries of abuses against the people of africa as fiefdoms of the empire, killing and grabbing people as slaves, followed by a pretense of independent states with empire installed-and-supported dictators who acted as terrorist regimes against the population, and the resultant rejection of “the west” by the populations who had long since sought solace and cover and a home in contrary beliefs in religious fashion, and now the racist west finds it necessary to spy on everyone fearing retribution but while doing so paints a target opon “dissenters” who are fighting either the leaves-us-alone or rid-us-of-the-poison battles….
As far as diseases go, you’ve got your bacterial plagues, your viral syphillises, and your social enemosities – a mutual paranoia that never ends for as long as normal relationships of trust are not trusted.
This operation sounds like a pre-emptive strike to taking over Africa, again, for more mining, more oil and gas, and mowing down all the forests to plant GMO corn and wheat so the planet can double a population that is already too big for the planet.
Rosicrucians probably know better.
Sounds like a bit of nob polishing. It’s like calling Igor a “close counterpart” of Dr. Frankenstein. When the relationship is more one of subordinate flunky or lab assistant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxxSIX3fmmo
The British invented SIGINT, as we know it. Their intercept of the Zimmerman Telegram, which they handed over to the US, was instrumental in getting the US involved in WW1. GCHQ have a very long history and are no slouches.
FYI: the “Zimmerman telegram” you reference has long been exposed as a fake, created by British intelligence to create fear in the US and draw it into WWI. That worked. So there was no “intercept” but forgery.
This has been known for quite some time. The Brits have long successfully lured the US into their wars.
In foreign policy, diplomacy, war drum beating, etc., if it looks too good to be true it probably isn’t. The US has created it’s own fake pretexts, such as the blowing up of the battleship Maine in Havana (probably an accident or done to create the Spanish American War) and the Gulf of Tonkin incident, now known to be faked,
“Fake News” has long been the staple of governments, foreign and domestic.
The Zimmerman telegram was fake? Based on what evidence?
That’s an interesting argument, since an original typescript of the Telegram was discovered in Britain in 2005 (with Blinker Hall’s own handwriting), and since Zimmerman himself admitted to sending it (in a March 29, 1917 press conference, no less)
It’s true however, that the US government INITIALLY thought that the telegram was a ruse by the British, given the anti-war sentiment in the US.