Editor’s Note: To mark the beginning of the Trump administration, The Intercept is publishing this updated version of an article from the day after his election.
Donald J. Trump is President of the United States of America.
You’re terrified. I’m terrified too.
It’s not hyperbole to say the United States, and in fact the world, will need some luck to get out of this one alive. So let’s concentrate on making our own luck.
The people who run America have constructed a political system that’s like a glitchy killer robot, one we now know even they can’t control anymore.
Working as designed it murders African Americans and pregnant women and opioid addicts. The Iraq War was a minor hiccup that caused it to obliterate a country, several thousand Americans, and hundreds of thousands of people all around the world. The housing bubble was a more serious bug that liquidated hundreds of thousands more from the poorer half of the rich world.
But with Donald Trump, for perhaps the first time, the robot has totally ignored the commands of its creators and now has everyone in its crosshairs.
If there’s anything to learn from history, it’s that elites don’t dismantle their beloved killer robots on their own. Either regular people — including you reading this right now — will deactivate this one, or it will never happen at all. Not a single person knows exactly how to pull this off. But one thing’s for sure: Trump’s rise proves that whatever it is we’ve been doing isn’t working.
So let’s exhale and let go of our fear, so we can think as clearly as we can about who we are and what we’re trying to accomplish. We can start by sharing whatever educated guesses we have about what we should do for the next few decades. Here are mine.
Politics is absolutely a matter of life and death. Treat it like it is.
Twenty years ago U.S. elites had so successfully depoliticized America that simply caring about politics was like having a super-weird hobby. It wasn’t even like being a Civil War re-enactor; it was like being a War of 1812 re-enactor. The social opprobrium meant that many of the people in grassroots politics were troubled kooks.
Today, mostly thanks to the internet, tons of normal human beings have been drawn into the offline political maelstrom, which is far less awful than the online one. Join it yourself and bring as many family and friends as you can.
Obviously this is easier said than done unless you have a fair amount of privilege. Part of what people with privilege need to do is make it easier for those who don’t.
If there’s going to be any political force that can resist Trump and build a livable future, it will be led by African Americans, Latinos, and young people from all backgrounds.
The role for older, richer white liberals will be important but painfully different from what they’re used to. They’ll have to support other people’s priorities, put up money for things they don’t control, and use all of their social power to protect Muslims, immigrants, and every threatened minority.
What white progressives can and must pursue is outreach to Trump’s white base. One of the killer robot’s main fuels is white supremacy. But human beings are complex and inscrutable and sometimes change. If just 20 percent of the white supremacy could be neutralized, the robot might be much less powerful.
White liberals will be more effective doing this if they first spend time considering how they may be as equally complicit in white supremacy as Trump voters.
The core belief of the technocrats who run the Democratic Party is that people rationally evaluate facts and then make decisions.
In reality, humans all have an emotional, internally consistent story running inside them all the time about the world and their place in it – and if they encounter any “facts” that contradict this story, the facts just bounce right off. Ironically, this is demonstrated by how Democratic technocrats emotionally reject all the evidence for this.
Trump succeeds at telling a story – and while it’s hateful and bogus, any story always beats no story. Clinton never tried to tell a competing story, making her blizzard of facts meaningless to non-technocrats.
Part of Trump’s story is “Muslims are lunatics who want to slaughter your children, we can’t let them in!” Clinton would respond, “An intriguing Harvard School of Government study found our circa-2014 immigration vetting procedures were able to measure radicalization by five benchmarks that [audience loses consciousness].”
By contrast, a progressive story would say: “We’ve been bombing the Middle East for 60 years. People there are mad about it just like we were mad about 9/11. Until we stop bombing them a small number of Muslims will always want to retaliate, and some will pull it off no matter what we do to prevent it.”
That’s more complex than Trump’s story, but it’s superior because it’s true. If people internalize it, they can also understand facts about the world that would otherwise seem incomprehensible.
Here’s another possible progressive story:
“Capitalism was so cruel and brutal 100 years ago that people came up with an even worse solution, communism. Rather than make compromises that would take the wind out of communism’s sails, the 1 percent of the day decided to back fascism. This caused a war so catastrophic that the 1 percent understood they had no choice but to accept reforms that would make life bearable for regular people.
“Then communism collapsed, taking the daily threat of nuclear war with it. Today’s 1 percent should be thanking God they got out of the 20th century alive and vowing never to make those mistakes again. Instead they’ve decided to make every mistake again and turn capitalism back into something that human beings cannot live with. Here’s our plan to stop them.”
Again, that’s a lot more complicated than “build a wall.” But that’s reality for you.
Any successful progressive movement will have to come up with its own broad, true story of who we are and where we’re going.
When and where are the next Democratic and Republican Party meetings in your neighborhood? You don’t know, because neither the Democrats nor Republicans are political parties in the historical sense. Mostly they just demand we send them money and then yell at us about voting every few years.
While it has almost passed out of Americans’ living memory, parties used to have regular, local meetings where everyone got together, yammered about politics for a while, and then drank beer. Elections were the culmination of what parties did, not the starting point.
A healthy political party would foster community and provide people with concrete things to do between elections. Mike McCurry, one of Bill Clinton’s press secretaries, once suggested that Democrats should turn themselves into a pool of neighborhood volunteers “so that when people are trying to accomplish something, they would say: Call the Democrats, they always have people.”
Or they could get members involved in a local fight for a $15 minimum wage. Or helping women get a safe abortion. Or restoring funding cuts to local colleges. Or whatever members decide. That’s politics.
In return, political parties need to provide concrete benefits to members. If the Republicans are going to murder the Affordable Care Act, the Democrats should be figuring out if they’re a big enough risk pool to provide health insurance.
I realize this is so far out of Americans’ experience that it sounds bizarre. It’s also the case that both party hierarchies would try to block any worthwhile experiments. But if the new organization based on Bernie Sanders’s campaign succeeds, it will probably look something like this.
Corporation television funded by corporate ads will never, ever hold political charlatans accountable. That’s not part of their business model.
The core problem is that accurate news isn’t profitable. It never has been and it never will be. Newspapers made it seem like it could be for about 30 years after World War II, but that was an illusion: The news just piggybacked on what people cared about more, like sports and classified ads. As soon as technology made it possible to deliver it all separately, the news business collapsed.
Fortunately, there’s a patriotic solution: public funding.
It’s totally forgotten now, but for the 100 years after the American Revolution, the U.S. government made it free or almost free to send newspapers anywhere by mail. It was available to papers of all political perspectives, with no government censorship. The rationale was straightforward: This was necessary for people to participate in governing themselves.
The cost was significant, the equivalent of about $30 billion today. One intriguing idea that would support the media on a comparable scale with a comparable lack of government influence would be $200 vouchers for every adult, who could then give them to any nonprofit outlet of his or her choice. To work, such outlets would have to take seriously the realities of human cognition, described above.
We’re not going to make something like this happen anytime soon. But since our lives depend on it, let’s start working on it now.
Don’t give up. As bone-chilling as this moment is, it also proves that no one’s in charge and just about everything in America’s up for grabs. After all, Bernie Sanders looks like he’s appearing in a role where the casting notice read: “Male, 70s, white, must look exactly like the caricature of a socialist from 1980s right-wing agitprop.” Yet from a standing start he almost beat Hillary Clinton.
Young Americans are extremely progressive, so much so that Frank Luntz, the GOP’s top pollster, says it should “frighten every business and political leader.” To some degree we just need to engage in a holding action until they’re running things.
Despite having no resources other than lots of cellphones with the Twitter app, Black Lives Matter has done more to blunt police brutality than anyone in the past 40 years. There should be classes taught around the world about how they’re doing it.
Years of effort forced the top of the Democratic Party to change its position on the trillion-dollar river that is Social Security. Bill Clinton yearned to divert a healthy flow of the cash to Wall Street, and was only thwarted at the last moment by Monica Lewinsky. Obama’s greatest dream was to cut benefits so that David Brooks would write a complimentary column about him. Even Trump will be hard pressed to slash it.
Lastly, if you squint even Trump’s triumph has a teeny-tiny silver lining: The GOP’s grassroots don’t care at all about the party’s dogma and will discard it at a moment’s notice.
As Bernie Sanders put it this spring, Obama’s “biggest mistake” was organizing a huge grassroots army and then telling all those loyal followers, “Thank you very much for electing me, I’ll take it from here.”
Obama had one of the most powerful political organizations ever assembled in U.S. history, and he just disbanded it. According to one of Obama’s top organizers, he saw it “as a tiger you can’t control.” This unquestionably contributed to the current Republican dominance of Congress, and now most of his presidency may be washed away like a sandcastle.
If he ran for president for some reason other than just to live in the White House for a while, he can’t now start jetting around the world and giving speeches for $1 million. He’s going to have to stay right here and try to muster his troops again. They would be a force to be reckoned with, especially if he and Sanders could collaborate effectively.
Like you, I have absolutely no idea if he’d do this. Maybe we should ask.
Liberals, leftists and sundry have real and profound differences. But for the foreseeable future we must hang together or we will surely hang separately, metaphorically or otherwise.
Since we’re stuck with each other, let’s be kind. In a country engineered to treat everyone horrendously every day, demonstrating that we extend real respect to one another might even be a winning recruitment strategy.
You lost me at:
“Working as designed it murders African Americans and pregnant women and opioid addicts. ”
The linked articles don’t even come close to your conslusion. This misleading statement places the article in the realm of “fake news”.
Unfortunately for this little tale, the earlier Progressive movement also embraced things like war, eugenics, technocracy, corporatism, and – yes – fascism. Some feller named Croly and some other Roosevelt buddy named Tugwell were into Mussolini, and some other Progressive feller named Ely tried to get anti-war Senator LaFollette lynched over his peacenikism. So how’s about we just drop the whole bullshit “progressive” terminology?
Also, Obama’s original “organization” included people who thought he might, you know, close Guantanamo and stop bombing other countries. Not sure why they thought he might consider these policy tweaks. Could be that his failure to do those things had something to do with its demise? Well, that plus the fact that you couldn’t keep your doctor and “shovel-ready jobs” apparently only included the third vacation homes of Wall Street bank executives.
Otherwise, carry on.
Typical. More identity politics. I’m not defending Drumpf, but Obama and Sanders collaborate? Two warmongering neocons showing us the way into “endless war.” Brilliant. Who writes this stuff?
It takes a village, to raise a child.
It takes a party, to bring together the most broad and robust constituency in opposition to our good cop/bad cop parties.
It takes IRV (aka RCV) to get new parties.
Intercept: Please look into this. So far, only Greens support.
With Nader’s IRV, Gore would have won. Likely, with it, Clinton II would have won, too.
Intercept: This being the case, why, do you suppose, Dem.s oppose? –
– Please look into this. There is a strategy. It’s not a third party; it’s open parties. (Trust democracy?) Copy the method civil rights ‘radicals’ used when Dem.s were the party of Jim Crow. Brave! Such a difference can be made if radical civil rights movement applies the strategy to open elections.
Such a difference must be made. Because it takes a party.
This is a wonderful article, which gives us hope!!! As did the Women’s March on Washington. “Where there is life there is hope.”
Some of the comments give us hope, too. I am from the Trump Demographic, but I supported Obama, then Bernie, until he asked us to support Hillary. I just started reading “Our Revolution” and I also like, at least some of, the ways Obama thinks.
I come from a proud Northeastern Democratic tradition, and several of my circles TOOK PART in the WMW. Until DT’s first five days in office I believed the most urgent issue facing us was the need to address Climate Change.
Until I can get my act together, I surf and post, surf and post, surf and post, nearly as mindlessly as DT tweets.
This also motivated science degree holding grandmother is going to make a pink kitty hat, as her sensibilities dictate that she calls it. ( Dubbed that by one of her friends.)
We all have to do what we can do against DT!!!
For those of you who are tech-savvy, somebody recently turned me on to CodeForAmerica.com.
It’s a way to volunteer your time to a.) make the government function effectively through designing better systems, and b.) build your experience and portfolio.
Why isn’t there a political equivalent of hacker news? This is a good article but what one comes across is rather random, even if one reads a lot. Check out The Big Idea article on Vox.com for a good article on both reason to hope and meaningful action to take in the meantime. Ideally, good stuff like this would be read by the widest possible audience. Multi-billion dollar newspaper subsidies are not needed. The community can also vote continuously on what’s worth reading and organise ways of preventing fake news and fake participants.
Hey, where’s that echo coming from? ????
Anyone else have any thoughts about a General Strike?
Any thoughts about a General Strike, Jon?
Or, anyone else?
“Liberals, leftists and sundry have real and profound differences. But for the foreseeable future we must hang together or we will surely hang separately, metaphorically or otherwise.”
Agreed, but I think it’s time for establishment Dems to step aside and let the Sanders/POC/truly progressive bloc to take the lead. That would’ve been my #9, and similar to #2. Great article.
Glad they dusted off THIS hyperbolic gem. Oh wait, it’s not hyperbole? Oh my mistake then.
Number 3 is galling because it oversimplifies the Right’s identity politics issue. I’m not saying you have to agree with them. I certainly don’t. But there’s a difference between understanding and agreeing, between turning up your nose vs saying “look, I see where you’re coming from, why you’re worried, but consider…” Identity politics are part of the reason why we lost the election, and you can’t counter an opponent you don’t understand, as Hillary learned with her “deplorables” commentary.
I think we should downplay identity politics altogether. Stop talking about BLM, start focusing the rhetoric on the need for criminal justice reform, how this would improve everyone’s lives. Include in police training the message that racial profiling alone is lazy, statistically unreliable, and beneath you as an officer, and the pieces will fall into place on their own. Focus less on race, more on class, wages, and providing education. Minorities will naturally be elevated, yet the grievances of the Right will begin to sound hollow. Win win.
Jon, it’s too late. There’s nothing you can do no more.
You’re doomed! DOOMED!!!!
Excellent article. Kudos, brother!
Absolutely spectacular! Thank you for this. It’s the first time I felt optimistic and empowered since inauguration.
“Here’s what we do next”….Mr. Schwarz: newsflash! : A good many of “we” voted for Mr. Trump. Get over it.
You are hearing this from a protester; civil rights in the 60s & 70s, Vietnam, etc.
As a matter of fact, I rather consider myself a ‘leftist'; but the Left has changed over the years. Now the Left is the ESTABLISHMENT, with all its phony politics, platitudes, and political correctness. When political correctness displaces TRUTH we must act to recover our republic, and the election of Trump shows the public’s recognition of this fact.
Whether the billionaire revolutionary can accomplish his goals remains to be seen. In the meantime, he deserves to be given a chance to prove his leadership.
I voted for ‘the audacity of hope’ as well, but Obama did nothing but make matters worse.
So: be an American. Support our president. You owe it to your country!
LOL, right! Obama voter who voted for Trump.
Will, sorry to be so glib, but just because the left is the Establishment (one of the reasons you’re probably here, the Intercept’s reliance on unbiased watchdogging), certainly doesn’t make Trump “truth” in any way, shape or form. We didn’t owe it to our country to support our leaders during Viet Nam any more than you did, nor did we owe it to our country to support “W” and his war crimes and cronyism. We certainly don’t owe it to our country to support this latest buffoon and in fact I would argue that we owe it to our country to what we think is right. In this case it’s call a spade a spade.
Did we owe it to our country to support Obomber’s neocolonial invasion of Africa (we came, we saw, he died ha ha ha), or his funnelling arms to Al Queida in Syria? (Both under Hitlery’s most qualified advice).
Did we owe it to Klanton I, when he killed more people bombing the former state of Yugoslavia than were killed in the massacres the bombing was ostensibly to prevent? What about the daily bombing of Iraq, euphamistically referred to as a “No Fly Zone” along with genocidal sanctions there that killed half a million children under 5 (but the price was worth it?)
Or, are War Crimes just peachy with you, as long as it’s the Blue Team committing them?
Although I voted Stein (because she was the only candidate who was not far right in my state), there is definitely a case to be made, from the Left, for supporting Drumpf (arguably more in line with actual Left values than the weak case for supporting the arch-corporatist Goldwater Girl, Monsanto Attorney, WalMart Board Member, and friend of banks and war profiteers.)
Of course, if you are one of the low information types who pledge fealty to the Blue Brand of War Criminals, you probably are too ignorant to notice this, but at least Drumpf has not yet commited the ultimate War Crime of a War of Aggression.
Until we face the reality of how we started in that those whom, with their ships full of weapons rather than tradeable goods, came to the New World to seek riches and resources just represented a form of capitalism sanctified in their minds by claiming the lands they landed upon in the name of some earthly sovereign in union with their version of a God’s blessing, we will never be able to find our North Star to guide us toward what a great society should and could become.
nope, not for me, sorry. I will continue to think “as an individual”. I will not think and speak “as a white, male, atheist, liberal, non-college educated, etc” label. I won’t do it, I encourage others not to do it. The highest level of respect you can give someone is to acknowledge their presence as an individual, not assign their place based on gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, shoe size, etc… Is it easier for me to say that as an individual who has not experienced a lot of discrimination ? Yes, of course ! Not experiencing discrimination is f’n fantastic, that’s why the answer is less of it, not more. This election should mark the death of failed identity politics, not a call for more of it!
This election, and this country, has always been steeped in identity politics – only the term isn’t applied to the ruling identity.
The Democrats want to regain respectability? Try doing these:
Stop yelling at progressives who didn’t vote for Hillary. Constantly screaming the “you MUST vote based on fear” Podestra approved talking point is boring and stupid.
How many in the DNC leadership are rich white people? A lot.
If Ellison becomes DNC chairman, so what if he’s a Muslim? Yes the racist neocons will try to spin that to their advantage. But to hell with them.
Stop looking down on people who aren’t Democrats. The last time I checked, there are at least 20 other parties other than Republicans and Democrats. It didn’t exactly help that the DNC wanted Hillary as President BEFORE the campaign. Sanders? He’s a fucking Socialist, for God’s sake! Jill Stein? Left wing nut case. Insulting potential supporters is NOT the way to build support.
Is Sanders a Democrat or not? Who the fuck knows. The way he sees it, he has a global name, millions in funding and supporters. Therefore, he’s an Inside the Beltway Power Player not to be fucked with. But he’s not.
You really want a better health care system than the ACA. Have the guts then to have single payer. How long has this political fucking around gone on? What, over 100 years? Other countries who have single payer. Are they disgusted at us or laughing at us?
Amen, Tom.
excellent article! captures the spirit of the creature out of the bottle.
absolutely! IMO, it’s all downhill from here. And here is why i believe that to be true –
Americans evolved from a culture of kill and steal. The tools for doing so are the same tools in use today. These tools appeal to greedy people – like wallstreet thieves who use them to rob americans, and rob again. But the consequence of this abuse has done 2 things to make america’s downfall inevitable.
1. it has created a society of victims who have accepted war death soldiering borrowing renting losing etc as normal and expected
2. it has created a cultural directive of “bumper cars” triggers – ie – dont fix it if it aint broke. And that is a problem because american failing to plan is a plan to fail.
That’s quite a wish list. Too much too soon, IMHO. I am still hoping Trump will self-destruct and resign in disgrace within a couple of months. But that’s a great summary of the history of the 20th Century.
even W survived 8 years… sorry
But, there’s never been anyone quite like trump elected for the U.S. Presidency, nor has there ever been anyone so thin-skinned, narcissist, and out-of-the-gate dishonest as he is, or was. It feels like a nightmare that you can’t wake-up from.
The only local thing we have going is a weekly meeting at the Unitarian Universalist church. Not my cup of tea as an apatheist, but go I will. Thanks for this.
# 7 would be very interesting –organized and run by the Women’s March—
Fat-assed old white guys– had enough of their B.S.!!!
I must be missing something, because #2 sounds weird coming from a white liberal, writing for a mostly white publication financed by whites. Maybe white radicals are exempt? Rather not play that game.
I think it’s a good list. Share it around, I say. Share it with people you know. –why am i telling this to all you people i don’t know!? Yes
I’m really not seeing how Trump is a killer robot. Maybe I’m dumb, or maybe leftists are just mentally ill
“Capitalism was so cruel and brutal 100 years ago that people came up with an even worse solution, communism.”
Maybe capitalism *is* as bad as communism. Maybe the inevitable conclusions of capitalism are the selfsame problems identified in this article. Maybe we can’t save capitalism, and trying to do so just prolongs the trouble.
There exists neither an “..ism” nor an “..ocracy” that humans can’t corrupt to destroy in practice the societies they are supposed to serve in theory.
What many often fail to see is that it was authoritarian communism which proved to be as bad or worse than capitalism. That is not to say that communism is the perfect solution. But it is quite easy to argue, given the biological background of the human species, along with modern scientific knowledge regarding environments and ecosystems, that cooperation, sharing, community, are far more rational and “natural” ideas to structure society around.
As Thominus points out, our structures are often corrupted. Because whether through ignorance or greed we allow them to. We’ve allowed massively ignorant and greedy individuals to control the course for millennia. But this is not some natural law, some foregone conclusion. It is within our abilities to change this, not guaranteed to, but within the realm of possibility.
The first step is simply recognizing that we’re like a horse in a parade wearing binders. We’ve all been trained from birth with stories which slowly boxed in our rational world, our reality. To many imagining a world with true justice and equality is akin to riding a fire-breathing dragon. But they are nothing alike.
Please do not speak for me. You may be terrified. I am not. I know it is comforting to think everyone thinks “I” do, but I have learned I really only live in what one author said “was in the splendid isolation of my skull”. I need to speak for myself.
Thanks – some good ideas. In seeing what EOs were signed last night, the conservative agenda is up and running. Unless people get involved, I don’t think we’ll recognize this country in four years.
Mostly this list (like some of the articles being posted to TheIntercept.com now) are vague disappointments.
“We need a story” and that story had better be something that recognizes how rejecting neoliberal policies are a perfectly valid reason for having rejected Hillary Clinton and any further involvement by Barack Obama (directly contradicting #7). Obama’s wars (both the G.W. Bush wars he inherited and continued as well as the new wars he added) and Obama’s choice to let the banks wreck the economy without justice are two big reasons why recent years were filled with horrible ‘stories’. Your stories had better come with specific policy recommendations told with enough spine to not let neoliberal or neoconservative policies in (for example: there’s massive support for a universal single-payer healthcare system in the US and there’s ample room for having a serious discussion about the need to replace Romneycare/Obamacare, so research and discuss HR676 and extending Medicare entry age to birth and regaining prescription drug negotiation power). TheRealNews.com recently published a multi-part interview with Nina Turner which was interesting right up to the point where she gave Sen. Schumer a pass saying he was a necessary “bridge” between factions of the Democratic Party. She lost me at that point because I saw that as caving into more corporate rule.
Bernie Sanders signed away most if not all of his respectability when he endorsed Sen. Clinton (who likely cheated him out of the primary and should have given up her campaign when polls indicated Sanders had a significantly easier time beating Trump than she did; after all, Democrats agreed then it was all about beating Trump). You’ll need someone with Nader’s ability to debate and his unwillingness to give into corporate power.
“We don’t need a third party, we just need a party” ignores how we got where we are. The Democrats have showed over the past few years that they’ve lost the trust of the people (you don’t get to minority House, Senate, and state governorships for no reason). Unanimously electing Sen. ‘big bank’ Schumer as Senate minority leader conveys the same tone-deafness that led them to their embarrassing presidential loss (as in, sure, keep calling Trump childish names while he wins enough electoral votes to beat your candidate). Stop trying to rehabilitate one or another wing of the corporate duopoly. Fight for letting the public hear from third parties and independents alongside the duopoly candidates in non-partisan-run debates (real debates, not the CPD junk). Fight for a binding ‘none of the above’ election choice to handle candidates so much of the country hated (like Clinton and Trump both were).
I certainly hope these recent Intercept articles are flukes and not indicative of where this site is headed.
Your comment is a jewel of clear thinking.
Jesus Titty Fucking Christ, stop being such a drama queen
The Trumpinator will be in power for eight years. And his Successor will be further Right than Him. The Movement of the Overton Window cannot be stopped. It’s a world wide phenomenon. Adapt and stay calm lol
What a bunch of insane crap!
Thank Jon.
#7 is so true. The first part. Why after getting everyone so excited and involved did he clam up?
if that’s the best you can suggest, then we’re fucked……
Not a bad list at all. I particularly agree that we need to find arguments that appeal to emotion, not just reason.
Better work on those emotional appeals, because to a lot of us they just sound like whining.