PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP is expected to sign an executive order on immigration that will be a radical departure from decades of U.S. policy on refugees, all but ending an era in which the United States was a haven for people fleeing war and oppression.
A leaked copy of the draft order indicates that Trump will halt all refugee resettlement to the United States for the next four months, while indefinitely banning the resettlement of Syrians. The proposal will also halt immigration entirely for 30 days from a list of Muslim-majority countries.
The order comes at a time of rising anti-Muslim sentiment in the United States, as well as an international refugee crisis that the United Nations says is the largest since World War II. Millions of refugees are fleeing countries like Iraq and Syria — where the United States has ongoing military operations. While the U.S. has resettled tens of thousands of people from these countries over the past decade, that slightly-ajar door now appears to be slamming shut.
Trump has argued that new restrictions on refugees and immigrants are required to combat the threat of terrorism in the United States. But his proposal is a drastic change for U.S. policy. Since 1975 the United States has accepted over 3 million refugees, including many from war-torn countries, thanks in large part to legislation like the 1980 Refugee Act. Even under Republican administrations like that of Ronald Reagan, the United States maintained relatively generous immigration and refugee policies. During Reagan’s presidency, the United States welcomed hundreds of thousands of southeast Asian refugees fleeing war and oppression.
“Our nation is a nation of immigrants,” Reagan said in a 1981 speech. “More than any other country, our strength comes from our own immigrant heritage and our capacity to welcome those from other lands. No free and prosperous nation can by itself accommodate all those who seek a better life or flee persecution. We must share this responsibility with other countries.”
In what appears to be a recognition of the drastic changes at hand, the National Association of Evangelicals issued a statement today calling on Trump to continue accepting refugees fleeing wars in the Middle East. “News reports that the Trump administration plans to make severe cuts to the admission of refugees based on their religion or national origin are alarming,” the NAE said. “We call on President Trump to declare his support for the continuation of the U.S. refugee resettlement program, which is critical at a time when the world faces a significant refugee crisis.”
There is little indication that Trump plans to heed these calls. In addition to his public reiteration today of a promise to build a southern border wall and ramp up deportations, there have been a number of reports in the past several days of individuals from Muslim-majority countries, including students, having their visas abruptly cancelled while abroad.
“Under Trump’s direction, the Department of Homeland Security and State Department will likely work together to create a list of countries from which visitors should be banned,” says Matthew La Corte an immigration policy analyst at Niskanen Center, a public policy think tank. “We also expect this list to grow over time and be larger than the initial list of countries that has been reported in the media.”
The text of the executive order indicates that visas would be blocked for individuals visiting the United States from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, all countries with Muslim-majority populations. Trump made a campaign promise to ban Muslims from entering the United States, and the draft text of the executive order calls for the U.S. to ban “those who would place violent religious edicts over American law.”
Farhana Khera, executive director of Muslim Advocates, a legal advocacy organization, said that the proposed executive order would, “elevate the most bigoted stereotypes of Muslims and Islam perpetuated by anti-Muslim hate groups to the level of U.S. government policy.”
Khera added, “Based on what we’ve seen, we are deeply concerned that this order will erode our fundamental values as a country. The United States was founded as a haven for people fleeing persecution. Trump’s proposal undermines that principle while making good on his outrageous promise to ban Muslims from entering the U.S. entirely.”
While full details of the order are not yet clear, its impact on refugees fleeing wars in the Middle East will be immediate and devastating. Last year President Obama reached his target of resettling 10,000 Syrian refugees, and more were expected to arrive in the coming year. This process is now expected to come to a complete halt, even for Syrians who have already been vetted and cleared for arrival.
“This is going to be devastating for refugees around the world. Pulling the U.S. out of its traditional leadership role in resettlement makes it harder to justify refugee resettlement as a good policy for other countries as well,” said La Corte. He added that banning refugees on national security grounds is a misguided policy, as refugees are already the heavily vetted and are themselves fleeing violence.
“At the end of the day refugees are not the perpetrators of violence, they’re the victims of it,” he said. “They’re the ones fleeing oppressive governments and terrorist groups, and they now face violence at home and bans on their presence abroad. What Trump is doing is not just un-American, its inhumane.”
Top photo: A woman cries as she and others wait for hours inside a police cordon, hoping to cross the border into Macedonia on March 6, 2016.
Why do white people think it’s OK to invite foreigners to the U.S.? This is NOT your land. This land was stolen from Native Americans, and only the traditional Native Americans should be inviting people here. Foreigners coming to the U.S. is the problem to begin with!
There is no such thing as a Native American. Those who are referred to as indigenous to the Americas migrated from Asia originally:
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dna-12000-year-old-skeleton-helps-answer-question-who-were-first-americans-180951469/
The history of man is one of competing migrations from which competition over land and resources is ever present.
Wouldn’t it be an interesting experiment if suddenly no refugees wanted to immigrate to the US? Just to show them. There are plenty of amazing, pluralistic countries accepting immigrants and not bending over to racist policies.
Here’s some thoughts this article triggered: If current trends continue, immigrants and their descendents are projected to account for the vast majority – 88 percent – of the population growth by 2065 (reuters 2015)
Donald Trump went to school majoring in Economics when the thought of the day on population growth was still mainly guided by the theories from ‘1798 when Thomas Malthus famously argued that population growth would depress living standards in the long run’ (International Growth Centre). A theory debunked later due to agriculture and manufacturing being brought into the reasoning.
Maybe he thinks he’s going to ‘save America’ by eliminating population growth, however he’s failing to realize one little detail. The current population (with no growth) would quickly age and become dependant on the social systems (say like medicare as an example) and there would be no young, strong, blood to keep building and really making America great.
That of course will take a decade or two to come to fruition, but he doesn’t care because in a decade or two he will be dead. Which brings me to my newest theory.
He’s the oldest president to take office, he certainly doesn’t look like a healthy specimen as many people his age are, and he knows his time is ticking… so maybe this whole running for president business is his way to ensure he doesn’t go alone. He’s just scared of death and wants some company during his transition, and what better company than the whole of America, or better yet, the human race.
Just like Holocaust victims and insurance claimants, “refugees” are as likely as not to feign their woes so as to gain entrance to the US.
Any and every such “privileged” status is doomed to abuse – massively so.
The US should abolish all immigration controls, along with the welfare and other government benefits that create the economic demand, and support, for them in the first place. All other countries – Israel most of all – should do likewise.
In light of how terrorists have infiltrated Europe great care should be the rule on evaluating potential refugees should be our policy!
This reminds me of how I blamed the ants for coming out and biting me as a child when I went over to their nest and tried to poke sticks in it
*cough* underground railroad *cough*
9/11 slammed it shut.PresBush 03-2003 opened the door of hell.
spot on
This is pure evil.
No. Maybe Muslim countries should care and address these issues– now they will!
How would you like it if a nation state screws you personally on the basis that it might pressure the US government to get its act together?
I honestly don’t understand how this is supposed to work, just in terms of practice I mean, not even politically.
Refugees are people who just show up and demand entrance. The way they usually avoid being sent back is that they come from a country that’s such a dungeon that the U.S. doesn’t even want to go there.
So if the magic 50,000 number is exceeded and the US has leftover refugees coming in, is it actually going to be shoving them back across the border into Iran, South Sudan, North Korea? What does this mean?
This seems altogether the wrong end of the process to be looking at — the real question is whether the US can work out one of those deals like Australia had to send immigrants someplace else. (No, I’m not saying I look up to that situation, I want to see refugees helped to resettle in neighboring countries before they ever come anywhere near here, but practically, it seems like Trump needs that)
good thing i’m not prez?
i would commandeer every congress persons home/s and turn them into multi family dwellings. Then we would have a national vote, and everyone who wants to take in a refugee can house them and be responsible for everything they do. – like bonding.
will the US end its long tradition of creating refugees, too?
These people hate America, do not let them in! Thank you President Trump!
Do the Muslims that already live here as citizens also hate America?
well, I say you hate America; where are we now
The only the real long american tradition is to murder people all over the world for fun and profit. Stop pretending to be nice. You are nothing but despicable scum bags.
America has had an on-and-off tradition of taking in refugees. In my case, my parents came in as essentially war refugees from WWII (I am an old dude now). Look up DPs or Displaced Persons. After the war (the big one called WWII), republicans did not want to take in any war refugees because they thought there would be too many Jews. No shit. This was after the world was more than well aware of what the Nazis did. So the republicans wrote the DP law to the best they could to not let in Jewish refugees. No shit again. Harry Truman wrote a scathing rebuttal but signed the bill as that was the best he could get–it was mf’er of a response. My parents got in because they were not Jewish.
Okay, fast forward. Trump another republican does not want to let in refugees from war torn (America bombed countries) Muslim dominate countries.
Here is what I say. Every day America lets in immigrants so in particular so high tech can hire low wage pretty much indentured servants through H1b visas. That is, America lets in immigrants if they can generate a buck so some high tech CEO can earn shitloads of money off their options. How about the democrats do the best they can to utterly stop this influx of H1b visa holders until Trump rescinds the ban on war refugees. Tell the high tech CEOs to go to Trump and whine about their lost profits, and let refugees in.
Have the democrats tell Trump and the world they have moral integrity, and don’t give a shit about corporate profits. What the hell, who am I fooling.
american foreign policy is a truckload conjob on Americans
Hellary wanted to screw America with her giant Hib TPP being the wallstreet whore she is. Her pimps got scared about the email leaks so they murdered Seth Rich figuring he could cost her the election and their dreams of running the planet – small price for their evil ambitions.
US is being invaded by mexico at a avg rate of 1M a year since 1975. Wallstreet thieves love it as mainstreet suffers.
Another aspect of this is how will this affect U.S. Citizens who regularly travel to and from their countries of origin? Does this mean their relatives will not be allowed to visit the USA?
What about adoption opportunities, sending money to relatives from the counties in question?
What about people of other religious faiths from the counties in question? ..i.e., the Jews in Iran, the Christians in Syria?
Yes Christians and Jews are fine it’s just the Muslims that will not assimilate to the US tradition of multiethnic, one culture.
You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. I didn’t even know my brother’s fiance was Muslim until a year after I met her, and they share a house with me. If that’s not assimilation, I don’t know what is, you presumptuous tool.
Please define who decides what a multi-ethic one culture entails..
Also define who decides what assimilation means
You have apparently never been to Williamsburg. And you sound like the borg
Ahh yes..the ol , “you have never been where I have been ” logic..when you’re never wrong, because you know where you are..What do I sound like now?
Oops..sorry
Thanks to refugees I now have to wear a Glock 19 pistol wherever I go. The 75,000 Somalis that have taken over Minneapolis are menacing and destroying life as I used to enjoy it. Somalis hate America and Americans and have vowed to kill us all because we are “Infidels”. I must stay on alert because Somalis can attack with no provocation and Kill us all!!!!
I’m not even taking that seriously
It is horrible what Bush, Hillary, Obama and American progressives did to you.
Normal humans in the US are trying hard to make leftist liberal progressives less influential.
It’s tough because they are ‘progressive’ so they are always right.
There’s a libertarian side to this issue as well, as the traditional libertarian view is that anyone should be allowed to come here as long as they’re non-violent. It mostly boils down to whether or not you believe most Muslims are violent.
Personally, I think the notion is absurd. Religion by itself does not make people violent. It’s the messages you take from your religion that matter. That’s how you can have the likes of Robert Dear claim the same influence as the hundreds of Christian charities. I don’t know why people assume Islam is any different.
I’m sorry we have failed you and the world. American Exceptionalism has meant some bad thing over the years, but the good was always our acceptance of those in need. Look at the Jews, Irish, Italian, Vietnamese, etc… who live here as Americans.
My grandparents.
To the world: I am sorry. I don’t know what happened here, but I am so sorry.
Rather than discussing and refuting the security concerns that Trump’s immigration policies are based on, this article blatantly implies that the only possible rational for such actions is racism and xenophobia. It is not “un-American” to put the safety of American citizens before that of refugees. If you refuse to believe that these refugees pose a security threat to the United States, than attempt to prove that, instead of strawmanning the issue. You can’t win an argument if you don’t address your opponents points, regardless of how many people you accuse of being racist xenophobes.
Looks like the white house is doing their best to make sure this topic isn’t debated or discussed further. Petition on the white house website isn’t logging number of petitioners and the tinyurl link doesn’t work. How do we bring attention to this??? https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/do-not-halt-refugee-resettlement-lower-number-we-resettle-or-stop-resettlement-based-religioncountry-origin
The poor refugees.
Sounds like a wise policy. Once the Border people are in control and confident, then the USA might try to help deserving refugees.
“Deserving refugee” is a redundancy. If a person is a refugee it means that it’s a person deserving of asylum. “Undeserving refugee” doesn’t make any sense and doesn’t exist.
Refugee definition:
noun
a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.
well, ya gotta give it to this guy – hasn’t worked for what they need to deserve
3 million since 1975…very impressive.
oh sorry, thats fucking nothing