When Anahita Avestaei’s father died in Iran earlier this month, she couldn’t attend his funeral. Blacklisted from returning to Iran due to her work with a human rights NGO, the 30-year old had been granted asylum in the United States two years after arriving as a law student in 2010. Unable to go home after her father’s death, she made plans to meet with her mother in a third country in the coming weeks — in the hopes of at least mourning together.
But now, thanks to President Trump’s executive order restricting the travel rights of Iranian nationals and others, those plans have been cancelled. Not only will she be unable to meet her mother, her future in the United States is being called into question by the major policy changes being enacted by the Trump administration.
Although Avestaei has a green card, she is now unable to travel outside the United States for fear of being barred from reentry. “I thought I was going to see my mom soon, but now it can’t happen,” Avestaei told me. “I really wish would not wish this feeling on anyone. To lose a family member while you are abroad and can’t come home. You feel guilty, as though you abandoned your family.”
Avestaei is just one of countless ordinary people whose lives have been upended by Trump’s recent actions. Despite widespread public outcry, more changes may be one the way. Trump’s executive order specifically targets nationals of Libya, Iran, Iraq, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. But in an interview on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday, White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus said that the order could expand in the near future, hinting that countries like Egypt and Pakistan may be targeted as well.
Priebus gave conflicting information in his interview about the impact on green card holders currently residing in the United States. A Department of Homeland Security statement earlier this weekend said that the measures would apply to green cards. But a statement issued later in the day by DHS Secretary John Kelley said that all lawful permanent residents should be granted the ability to enter the country, absent “significant derogatory information.” Amid widespread fear and confusion, many immigration attorneys have been advising clients who are not U.S. citizens to avoid traveling outside the country.
Iranian nationals in the United States — due to their precarious political situation and large diaspora — are among the groups most impacted by these new measures. The Iranian diaspora in the United States numbers in the hundreds of thousands, many of whom arrived after the 1979 revolution in that country. Partly as a consequence of geopolitical tensions, the U.S. has long been a haven for Iranian dissidents and activists fleeing their government.
But following Trump’s exclusion order, the position of vulnerable Iranians living in the U.S. has rapidly deteriorated. Unable to travel outside the country and facing the possibility of having their green cards annulled in the future, people like Avestaei have suddenly been trapped in a dangerous legal gray zone.
Part of the problem has been the chaos and confusion with which the executive orders have been issued. Trita Parsi of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) criticized the administration for repeatedly changing its messaging on the facts surrounding the executive order. “This is really banana-republic style,” Parsi said. “It was already extremely difficult for Iranians to get into the United States.”
Trump’s executive order also extends to dual-nationals of other countries, with the result that even prominent Western political figures with roots in Iran and other targeted countries have now found themselves barred from entry.
Due to the huge number of Iranians resident in the United States and their often difficult political relationship with their home country, Parsi said that, “Iranian Americans are affected more than anyone else [by the executive order], almost more than everyone else combined.”
On its website, NIAC issued a statement calling on the Trump administration to permit a grace period in the executive order to “enable all lawful permanent residents, dual nationals and visa holders from Iran and the other targeted countries to return to the United States to reunite with their families and return to their daily lives.”
But despite massive protests and legal challenges, the administration has signaled that it will fight efforts to halt the ban, while working to expand it.
For Anahita Avestaei, Trump’s executive order has called into question the new life she has been trying to build in the United States upon receiving asylum here. After originally arriving here to complete her legal studies, she was unexpectedly banished from returning to Iran after running afoul of the government by volunteering with a human rights group in the United States. Now she faces a future where she is both endangered in Iran and unwelcome in the U.S.
“Its not easy to leave your home, to leave your family, your neighbors, your cat. I never expected that I would have to leave them and make a new life here, but I have been trying,” she told me. “But now to have the country that you’re wishing to be your new home do everything it can to tell you that you are not welcome, that you’re not wanted here, it is too emotionally draining.”
“I can never feel safe anymore and it feels terrible. It is the worst feeling ever.”
So, any reason why the biggest terrorism enabler in the Middle East-Saudi Arabia (9/11) isn’t on this ban list. Does Donnie have business connections there? Hmm.
I have to say this is some pretty heavy handed stuff. I’m an American of Persian ethnicity and so is my wife and we both feel perfectly safe living in the U.S. While I agree that Iran should not be on any travel ban when KSA, UAE, and Pakistan are out there producing scores of terrorists, I would like to keep in perspective that this is a 90 day ban for visas only. Green card holders and dual citizens are not affected. Further, the government has issued waivers to dual citizens of many Euro countries so Iranians with dual citizenship to say Canada, UK, France and others are not affected either. Finally, this ban does not affect religious or ethnic minorities in Iran who are seeking to escape persecution. Its not good but lets be honest about how this affects folks and how many people it affects. What this really is about is Trump. The left hates him and every step he takes is twisted to make it sound much much worse.
Your papers won’t save you Neema. Just ask the thousands of Japanese Americans who went to Internment camps or thousands of US Born Latino-Americans who have been deported with their parents in the last few years.
If I was you, I would bleach your hair, get a nose job and stay out of sun to avoid showing your true colors and join a nice white liberal church. You could pass for an Italian after a few months. You’re already a second class citizen of USA according to the republicans who pushed through anti-immigrant legislation aimed at Iranian Americans during the last budget session in congress. i guess you didn’t hear that news on Breitbart?
but I can see how people in such obvious “high status” positions like yourself can feel such a false sense of security. Its like a crab in slow boiling water.
Let’s just hope they believe your lies about being white, non-muslim, indo-european or “aryan”? Or maybe you’re just an uncle tom, trying make yourself feel better about what’s about to happen to you if Trump’s wild, wet dreams come true ha, ha, ha…Good luck buddy. For the rest of us, its fight time.
So, I take it you are a Christian, since you say “this ban does not affect religious or ethnic minorities” within Iran and the other targeted countries. I think you meant religious minorities only, meaning CHRISTIANS. Yes, they are not affected. Green card holders, however, are…so are homosexuals, liberal muslims, and many others trying to escape persecution.
You and the left are both right. (Don’t you hate it when that happens?) You’re right in that the left hates him and often gets things wrong, or screams when it should be rolling its eyes.
The left is, unfortunately, right in that there are more things going wrong than the ones you described. Green card holders and dual citizens have already been affected: the administration changed its mind repeatedly over several days, and in the meantime these people were denied entry, handcuffed, even thrown out of the country and had their green cards taken away because the rules changed while they were on the plane. (Seriously. Look up Tareq and Ammar Aziz.)
Also look up Nazanin Zinouri – long-time US resident, PhD from a South Carolinan university, has a job in the US, plus a lease, a dog, utility bills, a car in a paid parking space. Was visiting relatives abroad when the ban went up and hasn’t been allowed back in. Other people hold visas that’ll expire in less than 90 days and the United States doesn’t exactly hand replacements out.
I’m not going to tell you how to be an American of Persian ethnicity, since I’m neither of those things. But one thing that worries me is the next time the White House decides it can change the rules without any warning and without care about the people it’s screwing over – even if the government is now making some effort to fix some of the things.
It’s not a Muslim ban you utter cretins. There are still around 1.3 billion Muslims who can get into the US no trouble.
Does it not feel wrong to spread bullshit like this?
Right, Johnny. Enhanced interrogation isn’t torture, and extreme vetting is not a Muslim ban.
To be honest, Iran would have been my first choice to put on that list, even if you could make an argument for such a temporary ban…what about Saudi Arabia, Qatar or even Turkey?
Also, most of the terrorist attacks in the USA over the past decade or so are not linked to any of the seven banned nations at all…
I know this is a juvenile response, but here goes. I won’t read this article. Your writing about Syria was so biased that I don’t trust anything you write.
The best way to oppose both Trump and the Clinton Democrats is to support putting Iran on the same basis as Saudi Arabia and Israel. This would stabilize the Middle East like nothing else. Sure, the Saudis and Israelis would howl in protest – so what? They’re more of a liability than an asset to the United States at this point.
The Iranian response has been far more rational and the Iranian people are not crazed apartheid supporters or radical Wahhabist terror financiers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Vpy70DEweg
It looks like Netanyahu is getting his way. The Israeli lobby has also introduced a bill into the house to grant Trump the power to start a pre-emptive war against Iran.
https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2017/01/29/pre-emptive-attack-iran-bill-active-in-us-house/
I extend sympathy to all the good people affected by this ban.
I hope that this experience will lead to an end of the ban against Israelis.
These seven countries have been banning Israelis for 50 years.
It’s hypocrisy for these countries to complain about banning when they’ve been doing the same thing.
16 countries that Israelis aren’t allowed to travel to! many of which purposefully expelled their Jewish population upon instituting their bans.
No one gave a shit about that, but I’m past expecting coherency from anyone at this point.
to be honest the israelis are living on occupied land. the israelis do not recogonise Palestine and building houses on occupied land. the israelis are responsible for alot more terror than any other nation.
Millions of Chinese settlers are living in occupied Tibet. Should we ban Chinese?
Jews lived for centuries in Hebron & Gaza. In 1929, Hebron & Gaza were ethnically cleansed of their Jews. In 1948, the West Bank & East Jerusalem were ethnically cleansed of their Jews. Why is it wrong for Jews to rebuild their homes in Hebron, Gaza, the West Bank & East Jerusalem?
Evidence that “the israelis are responsible for alot more terror than any other nation?”
In Iran large demonstrations by people shouting “Death to America” are common and have been for decades.
I can’t recall any similar demonstrations in this country against Iran.
Do you recall when Iran had dozens of military bases in Mexico and Canada, naval fleets off both coasts? When they crippled our economy with sanctions? Or when they launched that coup on Eisenhower, replacing him with a dictator puppet for three decades only to be replaced by the Christian theocracy we currently live under? How they supported Mexico with arms and money during the Mexico-US war in the 80’s that led to hundreds of thousands dead Americans?
Awww Son, you must’ve been too young to remember the 1970’s and 80’s then..”Fuck Iran” tshirts were popular with the raunchies
‘Never’ is a pretty long time.
Sorry, but the tearjerkers that are reported at TI as objective reporting, don’t work for me…
Reminds me too much about babies who were taken out of incubators and Assad who gassed his own people, and the courageous white helmet stories.
A Christian archbishop from Iraq is also affected by the travel ban.
http://religionnews.com/2017/01/30/trump-ban-will-hurt-christian-refugees-fleeing-conflict-say-iraqi-catholic-leaders/
So, either CBP admits this fellow, in which case the travel ban was all about religious discrimination all along, or they deny access to all Iraqis, which presumably includes their government and those who were fighting on our side. Which is it? Case by case? That could be time-consuming — and arbitrary.
Iranian Americans need to wake up to the reality that their nation is currently being sized up for attack by the United States of Israel, that’s the unfortunate reality. And all these picture of that U.S. flag hijab on that lady are kind of ridiculous considering all the muslim blood this nation has shed and is still planning to shed.
I’m pretty sure that I wouldn’t feel safe in Iran, or most of the majority Muslim countries. Just sayin’.
Ban does not prevent you from returning home to your Muslim home and doing well there-Pride?
NAH, I think we’ll keep them. On the whole we feel that they’re a bigger benefit to this great country than some half-witted inbred shit heel like you and your filthy ilk.
So, as for Anahita and other Iranian immigrants who are one of the most successful, highly educated and decent people in this country, I would like to say that you are welcome here, you are safe here, and you are protected here by US.
Anahita, don’t worry about Roch, he/she/it is nothing more than a coward hiding behind a computer screen, and cannot harm you in any way. We’ll keep you safe, we’ll keep you free and we’ll help you become a full fledged part of the American fabric.
More fake news from the intercept.
My advice would be to fire all of your racist identity politics based writers if you want some kind of credibility
Fake news?!!!! You are obviously a disciple of Kellyanne Conway. Did you click on the Intercept by accident? Shouldn’t you be over at Breitbart reading the comics?
If it’s not fake news then why is the reporter calling it a Muslim ban? That’s misinformation. There are plenty of other Muslim countries not banned.
No thanks. As long as this site keeps irking a clown like you, I say it stays.
Joe,
Have you finished your homework yet, young man?
You know the rules. You’re only allowed to troll after you’ve done your homework and washed the dishes.
Now GIT!
I am not from any of those countries ..and I don’t feel safe.
The title of this article is another example of what is wrong with the media’s coverage of this event. It is deliberately inflammatory and misleading. I expected better reporting from The Intercept. I am a Muslim, born in America, and enough is enough already.
The entry restrictions in President Trump’s executive order are for 90 to 120 days so that vetting procedures can be reviewed. The entry restrictions are NOT BASED ON RELIGIOUS IDENTITY. However reporting the restriction as a “Muslim ban” supports the “Trump is a bigot” narrative, so it is presented in that way.
Indonesia, the country with the largest number of Muslims in the world, is not under the travel restriction. Neither is India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, or Nigeria. These are the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th countries with largest Muslim populations.
So where does this list of countries originate, if not based on the Muslim population? The list of countries was created by the DHS under the Obama Administration after Congress passed the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 (signed by Obama).
In the case of Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Libya, they also happen to be the countries that have had US bombs relentlessly dropped on them over the past 2-13 years. (Sudan and Somalia are failed states, obviously creating problems for processing immigrants/travelers.)
Where was the outrage when Obama dropped 26,000 bombs in 2016 alone, mostly on Syria and Iraq.
Where was the outrage when the Obama administration actually created these migrant and humanitarian crises by funding “moderate rebels” (otherwise known as terrorists) to overthrow the sovereign government of Syria for US geopolitical goals? (If you still believe the US military becomes involved in the affairs of other countries for “humanitarian” reasons, you should stop following the news and start reading US weekly exclusively, because you’re a hopeless case.)
Where was the outrage when the Obama administration expanded drone attacks outside of war zones killing hundreds if not thousands of civilians in Pakistan.
Where was the outrage when Hillary Clinton’s State Department, and the CIA under the Obama Administration funded and facilitated turning Libya into a failed state.
Liberals didn’t care because the Executive responsible was on “their team.” But now, a 90-120 day travel restriction, this is where they draw the line! What a monster!
Also of note, it is ISIS’s stated policy to infiltrate refugee migration in order to spread terrorism to the West.
Jihoon!
Congratulation on showing bunch of Liberal left the actual truth. Like yourself, I am a Moslem and have to say also from Iran. The BS that this article is trying to put in front of public is nothing but the fake news. Their agenda is the globalist agenda. Thank God that someone with love for his country was just elected to be the 45th president of this great country.
For anyone that don’t want us to be safe and don’t like this president, go back to where you came from because you don’t deserve the prosperity and freedom.
Thanks for this, Maz. I was just thinking, this morning, about Iranian-American friends and their families — and that this shameful ban is, for them, “simply” the latest in a long series of abuses of Iranians and Iranian-Americans, by multiple governments of both countries, as allies and as adversaries, since (at least) the early 1950s.
Cry me river for the poor Iranians! You no longer feel safe in the US? Now we’re even! How many of our citizens have been illegally imprisoned in your country? Do you forget the ’79 hostage crisis? Some of us never will! No sympathy!
Very few, actually.
But you’ve never known, much less forgotten, the history that led up to that crisis. I assure you that many more Iranians will “never forget” the 1953 coup, orchestrated by the US and UK, that overthrew their government and replaced it with 26 years of Reza Pahlavi and his SAVAK.
You should be embarrassed by your ignorance and jingoism.
Another failure of our education system. You claim “Now we’re even!” and then go on to say “No sympathy!” If you truly believe we’re even, why the continued anger? You are not rational. If anger is your only emotion and you cannot feel sympathy, you are clearly not fully human. Your emotions blot out your ability for rational thought.
I am sorry, you cannot be trusted. On behalf of the United States of America, I hereby revoke your voting rights and your citizenship. You must leave immediately for the safety of our country.
Dan, please continue to admire emperor Caligula – aka Trump – and leave sympathy and thinking to others.
Jayz, stick to music, not thinking.
I’m certain Jimmy Carter will never forget the ’79 hostage crisis.
“After his overthrow in 1979, the Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was purportedly admitted to the United States for cancer treatment. Iran demanded that he be returned to stand trial for crimes he was accused of committing during his reign. Specifically, Pahlavi was accused of committing crimes against Iranian citizens with the help of his secret police, the SAVAK. Iranians saw the decision to grant him asylum as American complicity in those atrocities. The Americans saw the hostage-taking as an egregious violation of the principles of international law, which granted diplomats immunity from arrest and made diplomatic compounds inviolable.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis
You will find few more vociferous critics of the present Iranian regime than Persian-Americans. Please at least try to know a little of what you’re talking about.