On the afternoon of April 23, an American drone flying over the remote Al Said area of Yemen’s Shabwah province observed a group of men gathering to eat lunch at a security checkpoint.
Mansoor Allahwal Baras, a former Yemeni Army lieutenant in his late thirties, was chief of the checkpoint, and his younger cousin Nasir, 23, was also stationed there. Khalid, another cousin Nasir’s age, was home on vacation from Malaysia, where he was studying English and aiming for his bachelor’s degree. A car full of five others joined them — local militants, but familiar to the Baras men — and they sent someone else to fetch lunch.
As the drone hovered over them, the men did not panic or flee. For many in the region, the buzzing sound of American drones in the sky has become part of the rhythm of daily life.
But then the drone unleashed its payload of missiles, and in an instant, the impromptu gathering was transformed into a nightmare of heat, smoke, and shrapnel. All eight men were killed.
Mansoor’s nephew, Ammar Salim Farid Alawlaqi, heard the explosion from his home nearby, but he didn’t know who had been killed until a cousin called shortly after to tell him what had happened. By some accounts, a second missile had struck his relatives as they went to aid the others.
“We went to the cemetery and found Mansoor, Khalid, and Nasir, all but pieces of flesh [so] that we were not able to tell their appearances,” Alawlaqi told The Intercept in a phone interview. “It was a shock no human can accept and there’s anger at the U.S. government.”
The day after the strike, a Pentagon spokesperson said that the U.S. had killed “eight Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula terrorists.” Pentagon officials later added that a key AQAP leader, Abu Ahmed Al Awlaqi, had been among those hit.
This photo supplied by Ammar Salim Farid Alawlaqi shows Mansoor Allahwal Baras, killed in an April 23 drone strike, with a phrase attributed to the Prophet Muhammad that reads, “The eyes are shedding tears and the heart is in grief, and we will not say except what pleases our Lord. We belong to Allah and to Him we return.”
Photo: Ammar Salim Farid Alawlaqi
Alawlaqi, a 27-year-old grocer whose aunt was married to Mansoor, gave his own account of what transpired that day, saying that neither his uncle nor the two young men with him were connected to any militant group. What’s more, Alawlaqi says that the five others killed were not current members of AQAP. The man the Pentagon called an AQAP leader was known to Alawlaqi as Muhammad Awad Barasane. He said that Barwane had been with AQAP and then with the Islamic State’s Yemeni branch, but that he had left both groups.
The strike in Al Said was one of the roughly 250 attacks carried out by the United States in Yemen, a campaign that is now alleged to have killed as many as 1,200 people since 2010, up to 200 of them civilians, according to figures kept by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism. President Trump appears to be outpacing Obama in Yemen, with more than 80 strikes since January and a disastrous Special Forces raid that killed 25 civilians, including 10 children. The Trump administration has also lifted Obama-era rules limiting when strikes can take place for certain parts of Yemen. So far, there have only been a small number of alleged civilian casualties in drone strikes under Trump, but Alawlaqi’s account of who was killed on April 23 raises questions about the people that the military is targeting as terrorist threats.
The Pentagon did not respond to questions about the strike and the alleged civilian casualties. While Alawlaqi’s version of events could not be independently confirmed, it would not be the first time that the United States has misunderstood the social dynamics of the remote Yemeni provinces it is bombing, where perceptions of militant groups are often fluid and have more to do with tribe and family than international terrorism.
Alawlaqi’s relatives didn’t avoid the militants, he said, because they were known as local tribesmen. “To be honest, the five people in the car had past links to [terror groups], but they had quit this movement two years ago,” he said.
“Relationships between people in the community are about tribe and kinship,” he said, “according to their tribal relationships, people tend to invite each other to eat and talk, regardless of political affiliation.”
The sound of a drone overhead also wasn’t a warning sign. “The drones here are hovering 24 hours nonstop, whether day or night. Sometimes they disturb people sleeping with their annoying buzzing noise,” Alawlaqi said. “But it has become so routine for the general public, people don’t check whether it’s hovering above them or not.”
Alawlaqi told The Intercept that even if the militants were “wanted by the Americans, they have no right to target them while among innocent people.”
He believes the strike must have been based on bad intelligence. “When someone is wanted, they need to have enough evidence,” he said.
After the strike, a few local government representatives came to pay respects to the families of those killed. But Alawlaqi has heard nothing from the U.S. government.
Yemen as a whole is caught in the grip of a massive humanitarian crisis. A U.S.-backed Saudi military campaign in the impoverished country has led to massive civilian casualties, as well as food shortages and disease epidemics. Despite growing international outcry over the conflict, no political solution seems to be in sight, as the Saudi-led alliance has repeatedly committed itself to extirpating the Yemeni Houthi rebel movement at all costs. Even in areas like Shabwa, where many Yemenis are fighting the Houthis, when it comes to American counterterrorism operations, there is a sense that civilian populations are being lumped together with terrorists, in order to justify military operations.
“What hurts is that there’s a deliberate stereotyping, categorizing people under these [militant] currents,” Alawlaqi said. “If the population of this area is estimated at 20,000 people, and the militants are no more than 150 people, how can they treat all the population as though they are under the militants’ control?”
It can only be the US war machine aka Military Industrial Complex. There is NO greater good to achieve here. The US military and the private defense industry (they play grab ass with) are only concerned about money and geopolitics. Justification or deflection of endless casualties is a part of the game.
On a side note. I like to think the western power is bored, there is no one else to match its military strength. What do you do when you are bored? Use planet Earth as a open action adventure video game, the military industrial complex is the 1st person shooter. Endless campaigns of occupying and/or covertly invading foreign nations with impunity.
All that matters is make money.
Why no photos of the bodies? If you want to expose wars crimes, show the crimes.
As any lawyer will tell you, when you hide the bodies, you become part of the crime.
I think this whole exercise needs to be considered in terms of just war theory. I mean, from early Christian philosophers onward, it has only been regarded as justifiable to do violence if there is a reasonable possibility of success in ending some greater oppression. The U.S. activities in Yemen seem associated with remarkably little effort to make any such justification. It is one thing for the population to endure the constant intrusion of drones and the fear of their violence if they feel like this year or next their country will no longer be labelled as “al Qaida” on a map, and they will be able to go out and exercise whatever limited rights a “normal” Muslim country allows them. But it’s something else again when there is simply an ongoing for-profit drone program meant to look good and get funding and that’s all.
But usa_naziland is all about killing so surely your happy? The death_culture & praise of vile evil soldiers in your films proves this theory. I’m sure the cia_scumbags will be along to taint the victims as terrorists in some way but not directly ‘on side’ with terrorist they create around the world. Fuck america.
Genociding people has become an american passtime by the dumb&dumbers who support israeli genocide of palestinians, terrorist genocide of syrians, mutual genocide of africans and libyans, and now the people of yemen where 17,000,000 people have no life support. Unlike Hitler’s style, the new trick is to do this by proxy, or with some valid excuse like God’s will.
http://presstv.com/Detail/2017/03/22/515282/Saudi-Arabia-Yemen-massacre-Houthis
Finding excuses to reducing the overpopulation of the planet is going to become far more wicked as people battle for shrinking resources. Now where did i put that channel changer?
Right now people are already battling for resources against some 100 billion animals raised each year for ‘food’. That’s the real overpopulation crisis, not humans. We have enough to feed ten billion people, if we stopped the insanity of breeding animals.
ah but they hate us for our freedoms, not because we’re randomly killing them.
What is the US doing in Yemen?
Is the US at war with Yemen?
What are we doing in Yemen? Ensuring that our multi billion dollar sales of weapons to the Saudis work as advertised. Think of it as quality control with hands on demonstrations (sarcasm now off).
according to the wallstreet whore msm, nothing and no we are not.
however, http://presstv.com has and RT have accurate information of what the dumb&dumbers of foreign policy are up to.
The u.s. is at war wherever oil or precious metals and minerals are, screw the people that live there.
USG: OK, what do you want? For us to say, “oops!”?
At some point, as with Gaza, Yemen must be viewed an extermination.
As the Bible says “Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap.”
Obviously, not many people in the Pentagon believe the Bible.
Still looking for an answer to the question “why do they hate us”?
Sounds like Modus Operandi to me by the US / Saudi coalition. Killing family members of innocent civilians to badger on perpetual war. The war crimes just never stop.
One thing I have observed during a now long life: “Winners” are never put on trial for crimes against humanity.
Isn’t this what all drone strikes do?
I’m an engineer. It’s not difficult to make a drone that drops a servo controlled lawn dart tipped with poison that will almost always hit the intended target. The United States is intentionally creating terrorists. Why? It might just be to have an excuse to continue these wars for the military industrial complex, and to keep the wars going it intentionally kills innocents in order to create terrorists, who justifiably would hate the US government for murdering their family and friends.
Look at Syria for example. The United States isn’t in Syria to kill terrorists, it works with terrorists to overthrow Assad. The deal that Genie Energy made with Israel in August of 2013 is part of the reason the United States wants to remove Assad, so oil can be mined from the Golan Heights without protest from the Syrian government.
Why not write a story on that?
I am also baffled why munitions less prone to collateral damage haven’t been developed and/or deployed, if we actually give two shits about killing civilians (I suspect we don’t really care, or it is literally the uber-evil reasoning I have heard espoused- that we like creating more anger and adversaries, as it justifies yet more war and munitions sales). The technology is clearly there- we could have inch-wide micro missiles (which could be carried in large numbers, seemingly an advantage) that are camera equipped and could be locked onto an individual, with enough explosive to unequivically kill a hit target with almost no chance of doing serious harm to even someone standing beside them. Instead, we use Hellfire missiles designed to destroy tanks, which needless to say have a hefty kill radius. Even if we were too lazy to develop and deploy individual-targeting munitions (and it would be laziness or venality- we spend shit tons of money on weapon development), many civilian lives would be saved by simply ratcheting down the warhead size on our current weapons to something akin to a 60mm mortar shell. Wouldn’t work in this instance, but would avoid most instances of killing or seriously wounding unlucky bystanders 50 yards away from what you’re hitting.
Apparently you (both of you above) have never read Drone Wars or any of the other excellent books about drone technology. It may be “easy” to create more precise weapons, but with a flawed delivery system, including, of course, the numbers of people between target and “command,” what is the logic?
I can literally create a drone weapon. I don’t need to read a book from some jackoff that is filled with speculation. Writers are clueless, that’s why all they do is write. It’s TRIVIAL to make a weapon that is extremely accurate, and does no collateral damage. This technology has been around since the 1980’s but it’s not easy to do now and very cheap.
The military isn’t this incompetent, there’s a reason all this “collateral damage” is being done, because it’s being done intentionally. I don’t see any other possibility at this point. You don’t have to be some genius engineer to design this. I can do it with off the shelf parts.
I believe you answered your own question. It would be cheap to use smaller scale precision assassination drone tools. You think the MIC is incentivized to reduce costs to taxpayer while simultaneously making their racket less lucrative? Collateral damage is irrelevant to the MIC as is the cost to taxpayer. We are all livestock to them.
http://presstv.com/Detail/2017/05/21/522630/US-kamikaze-drones-Iraq-Daesh-Special-Operation-Command-SOCOM-Col-John-Reim
“The military isn’t this incompetent, there’s a reason all this “collateral damage” is being done, because it’s being done intentionally.”
Says the person who clearly has never been in the military. Incompetence abounds.
And boy golly gee sarg, this is one of those times when I wish that everyone had the experience of being in. McHales Navy and Gomer Pyle USMC are fantastic examples of incompetence.
Let’s not forget the crazy horse incident; those blokes were looking right at their fucking targets and weren’t sure what they were shooting at and shot anyway.
The use of poison darts would certainly be in contravention of chemical warfare rules. While it is ironic to think of the crude means being used as “humanitarian”, we would have to be *really* careful to make sure any change didn’t end up leading to the entire countryside being studded with poison darts and drones and toxic mines that could kill anyone at any time.
That said, of course I see no reason why a drone can’t deliver a small lump of explosive directly to the target.
“The use of poison darts would certainly be in contravention of chemical warfare rules”
The United States is in violation with the GENEVA Conventions which were signed as a direct result of Nazi German’s wars of aggression. I really don’t think that’s a particular problem with Fascist USA.
But if using “chemicals” within a weapon is forbidden, again, it’s easy to get around.
Yes -but Why?
1) Why do we even care what some jihaddist lunatic in some far away rock heap may think, say or do?
They are “there”, we are “here” and as long at “we” don’t directly bring them “here” there is no problem for our security, way of life, “values”, etcetera and therefore no need to do anything in particular about it, especially not by the millitary.
2) Why do we still carry this notion that the many “whack the leaders”-programs are successful or even a good idea to begin with?
All we are really achieving is to create a rapid promotion path for new leadership, which will not make the same mistakes that go the last one killed and know they are “on the clock” so they will be more ruthless than the last one too. Setting up a multi billion USD Darwinian experiment to evolve better terrorist leadership is what “we” are Actually doing with this “targeted assassination” rubbish.
The whole mess just makes us both stupid and evil, guaranteeing more, ever escalating, trouble down the road.
The drone warfare program is a disaster. Upwards of ninety percent of drone strike victims are non-combatants. Slaughtering innocents in funerals and weddings including women and children will bring the war here as retribution. The drone merchants are the only ones benefiting from this evil ‘no boots on the ground’ form of warfare.
Learn more at http://www.codepink.org/ground_the_drones and http://shutdowncreech.blogspot.com
there are 2 types of humans on this planet
those who are evolved, those who are not