One month ago, the award-winning journalist Javier Valdez was pulled from his car and killed in broad daylight near his office in Culiacán, in Sinaloa state in Mexico. Valdez is the sixth journalist to be assassinated in Mexico this year, and his killing has sparked outcry and sent new shockwaves of fear through the country’s media.
The journalists being targeted in Mexico have something in common: a commitment to documenting political corruption and state links to drug trafficking. Valdez’s assassination follows a pattern of murder directed at silencing the messengers who are digging up truth and exposing the underbelly of the drug war.
Valdez was the co-founder of Ríodoce, the only independent paper still operating in Culiacán, which is the center of the Sinaloa Cartel and much of the drug war violence in the region. In February, Ríodoce published an interview with an envoy from Dámaso López (“El Licenciado”), formerly the right-hand man of the notorious drug lord “El Chapo” Guzmán. Lopez was apparently moving to take control of the Sinaloa cartel’s territory in a fight with Guzmán’s sons before he was captured by authorities last month. Guzman’s sons reportedly pressured Valdez to not publish the interview. Other journalists who were close to Valdez suspect involvement of Sinaloa and federal authorities in the killing. To date, there have been no arrests reported in the case.
“We thought Javier was untouchable,” said Marcela Turati, a prominent journalist who writes for the weekly magazine Proceso who was a close friend of Valdez. “He was one of the most internationally recognized journalist in the country. How do we protect ourselves if they are able to kill the most visible with impunity?”
A week before Valdez’s murder, the Committee to Protect Journalists published a report detailing prominent recent murders of journalists and failures in the prosecution of the crimes. The Mexican government’s human rights commission reported in 2016 that 90 percent of crimes against journalists go unpunished — 82 percent for killings and 100 percent for disappearances, where the bodies of journalists are never found. Of the 114 murders of journalists that the Mexican government has recorded since 2000, a federal special prosecutor’s office for crimes against free speech has investigated 48 in the past seven years, resulting in only three sentences.
The U.S. State Department’s human rights report on Mexico last year noted that “journalists were sometimes subject to physical attacks, harassment, and intimidation due to their reporting. Perpetrators of violence against journalists continued to act with impunity with few reports of successful investigation, arrest, or prosecution of suspects.” This same line has appeared in all of these reports in recent years.
Nonetheless, in the face of blatant inaction by the Mexican government, U.S. assistance to Mexico’s drug war has continued to flow, and to expand. Declassified State Department documents unearthed in recent years show that the United States has armed and funded Mexican military and police units despite being well aware of abuses and cover-ups. At the same time, the United States has supported projects supposedly aimed at strengthening the rule of law in Mexico, but none of it appears to be having the stated effect.
Since 2008, the U.S. government has appropriated over $2.6 billion for security aid to Mexico through the Mérida Initiative — a counter-drug aid package negotiated between former U.S. and Mexican presidents George W. Bush and Felipe Calderón in 2007 — and other security assistance programs. Originally proposed as a three-year program, Mérida underwent a drastic expansion under the State Department of Hillary Clinton that continues today, despite President Donald Trump’s antagonism toward Mexico over immigration and the border wall.
The aid flows not just from the State Department, but also the Pentagon, Justice Department, and other agencies. The large part of this money is funneled through U.S.-based security firms, which reap enormous profits from contracts on everything from Black Hawk helicopters to armed vehicles, intelligence equipment, computer software, night-vision goggles, surveillance aircrafts, satellites systems, and more. Additionally, weapons companies benefit from direct sales of arms and other equipment, which net another billion each year for the weapons contractors.
Along with equipment, the United States exported a kill or capture targeting strategy against the suspected leaders of Mexico’s drug trade, an approach borrowed from counterterrorism that grew in popularity during Clinton’s tenure at State. U.S. officials who helped shape the targeting programs include Anthony Wayne, former ambassador to Mexico and before that deputy ambassador to Afghanistan, and John Brennan, former CIA director who served as chief counterterrorism adviser to President Obama. Brennan visited Mexico in 2009 to discuss the architecture and implementation of the high-value targeting, or “HVT” operations, modeled on programs carried out in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other countries.
Many observers and security experts believe that high-value targeting has only destabilized the drug trade without reducing it, leading to more violence. One of the most notable high-value targeting operations took place in Javier Valdez’s home state of Sinaloa in July 2010, where, according to formerly classified internal files obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request, the U.S. shared intelligence with Mexico’s authorities that led to the killing of Ignacio “Nacho” Coronel Villarreal, one of the four main leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel at the time. The killing of Villarreal led to a rise in fighting in 2010 over territory between Sinaloa Cartel forces and other organized criminal organizations such as the Zetas.
Towards the end of the Obama administration, the United States shifted its emphasis from military hardware to programs with a stated focus on institutional reform, including training law enforcement at the local level. The DEA, for example, has trained thousands of police officers in sensitive investigative techniques each year, while the Justice Department and other agencies have provided Mexican agencies with network, forensic, and biometric equipment. State Department cables show that U.S. assistance has included millions for state-level laboratories, crime-scene analysis, ballistic analysis, evidence gathering, criminal intelligence analysis and the like.
U.S. agencies say these efforts are key to strengthening Mexico’s investigative capacity, but they have done little to change the impunity for ongoing systematic human rights crimes, including killings of journalists. One of the problems, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, is that even when perpetrators are punished, collusion between the government and organized crime keeps investigators from identifying who is actually responsible for the crimes.
“We need an international presence to investigate what is taking place here,” the journalist Marcela Turati told The Intercept. “A representative or team of experts from the [Organization of American States] Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression, or another similar body from the United Nations that can investigate the crimes, identify the structures of impunity, and help Mexico redesign its justice system. Our government has demonstrated a lack of political will and capacity to solve these crimes.”
The U.S. government is well aware of the problem of institutional impunity; internal U.S. State Department reporting on Mexico, released via FOIA and through leaks, has provided blunt confirmation of a pattern of active cover-ups and linked Mexican authorities to abuses.
In 2010, U.S. Embassy officials were reporting on instances where drug trafficking organizations were operating with “near total impunity,” in the face of “compromised local security forces,” in Mexico’s northeastern states. Yet, U.S. training and assistance continued in the region. The U.S. Embassy and DEA carried out training programs for police from Nuevo León even as U.S. consulate officials said that the security apparatus in that state had been compromised, with the governor admitting that some state and police officials had been co-opted by the Zetas. U.S. assistance programs also continued as DEA officials reported on the arrests of active-duty and retired law enforcement officials in Nuevo León for providing protection and assistance to drug-traffickers.
In the case of a series of massacres in the northeast, in San Fernando in the state of Tamaulipas between 2010 and 2011, U.S. officials highlighted how Mexican authorities were trying to minimize “the State’s responsibility” for the crimes. U.S. State Department files document how authorities sought to cover up the violence, jeopardizing investigations by splitting up corpses of the victims “to make the total number less obvious and thus less alarming.” Nonetheless, after mass graves were discovered, the U.S. ratcheted up its programs in the region.
The search for justice for the victims of drug war violence has been led by journalists and by the family members of the victims, not the government agencies receiving U.S. assistance. And they have too often been silenced.
Miriam Rodríguez Martínez’s 14-year-old daughter, Karen, disappeared in 2012 and was buried in another mass grave in San Fernando. Rodríguez doggedly pursued those responsible for her daughter’s kidnapping and murder. Her efforts implicated members of the Zetas and resulted in the imprisonment of the primary suspect in the crime. She also led activist efforts by family members to find the remains of others disappeared in the region. Rodríguez was killed in her home in San Fernando on Mother’s Day in Mexico, just five days before Javier Valdez’s murder.
Valdez was intent on challenging the silence in the face of such crimes. When his colleague, Miroslava Breach, was assassinated in late March, he said, “Let them kill us all, if that is the death sentence for reporting this hell. No to silence.”
This article is being published in conjunction with an international campaign, Our Voice is Our Strength/ Nuestra Voz Es Nuestra Fuerza, to remember Javier Valdez and his work and to call for an end to impunity for crimes against the press in Mexico.
Top photo: A mural in memory of slain Mexican journalist Javier Valdez is displayed in Monterrey, Mexico on May 19, 2017.
Canada is not the only one to win the drug war.. Several other countries have as well. Most politicians would sell their own greedy mothers for a few greedy US law enforcement pay-offs.
http://yournewswire.com/bolivia-war-drugs-ban-dea/
https://stluciatimes.com/2017/03/01/venezuelas-anti-drug-policies-effective-without-dea
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/23/dea-controversies_n_5992324.html
http://plenglish.com/index.php?o=rn&id=13761&SEO=i-do-not-regret-expelling-the-dea-from-bolivia-says-evo-morales
http://cepr.net/blogs/the-americas-blog/remember-when-venezuela-and-bolivia-kicked-the-us-dea-out-of-their-countries-accusing-it-of-espionage-looks-like-they-were-right
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/I-Dont-Regre…
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/30/world/fg-b…
There never has been a war on drugs.
There always has been a drug war, on the competition..
Legalize
?End War on Certain Drugs
US & LatAm = Dumb & Dumber
Article ignores solution that’d have likely saved his life. Hint, it doesn’t deal with weapons or institutional impunity. Sorry, but when $100B+ of drugs flow north, nothing short of full legalization will substantially lower these murder numbers.
Yes, legalize even cocaine, heroin & meth, not just cannabis. Of total annual US deaths ~2,5000,000, only 50,000 (5%) is due to non-tobacco drugs, of which legal prescriptions killed more than illicit, with cocaine only ~5,000.
So cocaine, historically the big drug that has continually wrecked Colombia, Central America & Mexico…only causes 10% of the total non-tobacco drug deaths, and only….get this…..1% of tobacco deaths (~500,000). Yes, tobacco kills ~100x more than cocaine, yet where’s the guns on cigs?
Moving deeper into the real realm of drugs, obesity is linked to 300,000 deaths annually, with sodas likely contributing to a good percentage & there’s also likely linkage to some of the ~500,000 cancer deaths from sugar & artificial sugars, like in soda, as well as artificial coloring in candy. FYI: ex-Mex Prez Fox was a Coca-Cola Exec who increased soda sales by ~50%. So Mexico’s now one of fattest & most dangerous nations on the Planet.
There’s also ~90,000 deaths related to alcohol = ~20x more than cocaine.
When Portugal decriminalized drugs, it dropped ~80% from 80 to 16 deaths/yr. So decriminalization saves lives in rich nations like EU-US, but it doesn’t stop the pain in LatAm where drugs start, which is why legalization is likely the only sustainable solution. I still support protecting journalism though & donating to them as well, including TI.
There’s also fact that many so-called terrorists are propped up mostly on drug money. Yes, War on Drugs helps the Taliban! So who knew War on Drugs & Terror were twins. The latter war can be seriously diminished by 3 additional simple steps/stops: Stop occupation in Palestine, stop giving gulf nations weapons to carry out their Wahhabism-based extremism, & stop interventions in Middle East except for those approved by United Nations…but back to drugs.
We haven’t yet got to the deaths & displacements in LatAm from the violence caused by the War on Drugs, where many are civilians. We’re talking about hundreds of thousands of lives lost & displaced, not a few thousand. There’s also over a hundred million about living in nations in fear of drug gangs. Here in Brazil the drug gangs run many of the prisons.
So there you go: 1 solution to highly diminishing 2 wars, 200,000+ deaths & displacements, along with lowering the prison population while saving billions in costs & earning billions in tax revenue.
Legalize. Any questions? ?
From LatAm,
Nate Allen
?PostScript
2 Opposite Approaches in the Americas this week
In Miami, Trump bumped up the weapons approach to the disastrous & deadly War on Drugs in Northern Triangle (Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador), while sickly linking development loans to their obligation towards the continuation of war. By the way, this Northern Triangle focus is an continuation from VP Biden, whose own son was discharged from Navy after positive cocaine test. Oh the hypocrisy!!
On the opposite side of the spectrum, ex-President Mujica of Uruguay, the nation that legalized marijuana, is helping Colombia oversee the weapons displacement by the FARC.
A stark contrast between the 2 strategies.
Who does one trust more, Trump or Mujica?
However, at some point, LatAm & Caribbean deserve much of the blame for following the destructive & deadly dumbness. They need to stop their intellectual inferiority complex and start legalizing under a united CELAC. Once we legalize down here in LatAm/Caribbean, then drug traffickers only need to worry about trying to cross the oceans & the wall, whereas the rest of LatAm alone will be left alone from deadly drug lane since it’ll be legalized everywhere here. For better or worse, maybe this wall will mark a new dawn in LatAm-Caribbean integration & independence.
Long Live Legalization
América Latina Unida
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fast_facts/index.htm
Sorry for math error: 2%, not 5%
“Of total annual US deaths ~2,5000,000, only 50,000 (2%) is due to non-tobacco drugs”
All for 1%
So in summary, likely less than 1% (25,000) of total annual deaths in US (2,500,000) is caused by the combo of cannabis+cocaine+heroin+meth, yet LatAm allows itself to be brainwashed and torn to pieces over this 1%!
Maybe a war on soda + basic math skills will be a bit more effective at saving lives, if that’s indeed the aim of the war on drugs ;)
FYI: War on Terror is not a real war, so although my three recommendations mentioned earlier would likely lower attacks from Islamic extremists, terror is anything that brings fear, which is done by all religions, races & species, just like ‘drugs; are any natural or artificially made chemical that’s used as a med.
Lastly, while I blame LatAm for its own inferiority complex on the drug war, it must be pointed out that US has bullied many LatAm nations, like Bolivia, because it allows its own indigenous people to consume the raw coca leaf. So while I partially blame LatAm for its inferiority complex compliance on this truly dumb war on drugs, I also feel great sympathy for LatAm as they’ve been pummeled by the US for over a century, economically & military.
To be clear, I’m not anti-USofA, as I love folk like Amy Goodman & Juan Gonzalez @ DN, but I’m far more pro-LatAm and for LatAm integrated cultural sovereignty.
Great DN episode below with one of my many LatAm heroes, Mr Evo Morales.
Remember US of A…
Partners, not Bosses
Peace Out TI!…it’s been a pleasure commenting on your site.
Viva América Latina Unida
Hasta La Victoria Siempre
https://www.democracynow.org/2006/9/22/bolivian_president_evo_morales_on_latin
I’ll still be on the TIB side, but likely no more English comments for me on TI
Let’s not forget our liberal our “me first” generations, who fuel the drug economy for the Mexican cartels. These fine liberals, ever ready to find fault with, to point the finger of blame at everyone else. While ready to hand over their cash for “recreational drugs”.
What a clueless comment regarding the use of drugs to get high. People have been getting high for thousands of years; even other animals do it (birds eat fermented berries to get drunk, for example). The problem is not people buying drugs, it’s drugs being illegal, which they didn’t used to be until fairly recently. And some people use drugs to expand their consciousness, which is a far better use of a human life than anything else.
I agree about taking personal responsibility for what one buys — for example, if you smoke pot, you should make sure it’s grown organically and not by someone polluting a forest or cutting trees to grow it — but that’s clearly not what you meant.
Two words to solve this: legalize drugs. Duh!
If Mexico has sunk into the darkest of times, which I beleive it has, the US is not only complicit in facilitating the Overtly Criminal Government of Mexico with state of the art weaponry, also the utterly reckless and chaotic behavior of the cartels and their orbiting law enforcement personnel is a direct result of US medddling (See everywhere US intervention of this type has taken place….) Targeted kills have the same effect as removing the alpha male tiger shark from a particular reef, leaving the juveniles to duke it out for control in an unnatural environment. Naturally the young narco sharks have less experience in the Game and a far more prone to random violence. Also, as another commented, we have become self deluded if we believe we can come and go in Mexixco and not be part of the problem. As a frequent visitor to a particular area which I will not mention out of respect to the good people living and working there, I have felt the cartel presence creeping in lately, as the whole society in Mexico succumbs to the hell that the war on drugs has created. The particular area seemed to be out of the reach of the cartels, but lately there has been the familiar pattern of reported gang violence, murders etc. nearby. The Mexican dream is dying to our south, poisoned by desperation, greed, corruption and high tech weaponry wielded with lizard brain ruthlessness. Add in Tump’s toxic, incendiary blather just for fun.In the end, Mexico can blame us for their horrible situation, rightly so, but this dance of death cannot be done without a partner. This, our inseparable neighbor to the south, that In which the US has unlimited influence on every aspect of Mexican society. US foreign/Immigration policy ABC’s:
A. Bury the bodies in your neighbor’s yard,
B. Build a wall so you don’t have to be reminded of the crime,
C. Send the surviving members the bill for the wall’s construction.
Great analogy…you nailed it.
Agreed, a great analogy. But let’s DO IT! Build the damned wall NOW!
Wow, just so forward thinking and enlightened ! Sarcasm intended.
The chance of legalizing opiates and cocaine is about zero. There are too many private companies, public employee unions,and government agencies invested in the “war on drugs” to just call it off.
Securing the boarder to reduce the flow of drugs and increase the price is certainly a better strategy that the militarized strategy being pursued in Mexico and on the American Streets. Enlightened? Maybe not. However it is practical.
Please. Since we are only addressing the so-called wall as a deterrent as far as drug smuggling – and don’t get me going on human rights or pseudo US nationalism- anyone in law enforcement or intelligence or social science will tell you that the cartels are incredibly adaptive, time after time.
To make a long story even shorter, as the USBP guys on the line say: “Ten foot wall? Twelve foot ladder.”
P.S. FYI the proposed wall (which is pretty much dead in the water) is an extension/amplification of US Military Strategy regarding Mexico. Not a substitute by any means.
This whole apparatus and industry built on the war on drugs would be obsolete if we legalize, regulate and tax drugs. Ten years later, decriminalizing drugs has been a huge success for Portugal
http://www.alternet.org/story/151635/ten_years_ago_portugal_legalized_all_drugs_–_what_happened_next/
Yes! All drug war violence is produced by the drug war. The people who are responsible for all this violence are those who support this war such as all drug fighters and illegalizers.
I agree that we should legalize and tax drugs. But if we did, today and the violence subsided tomorrow, there still has to be some apparatus for closure and compensation of some sort relating to justice. Perhaps a truth and reconcilliation process would be a better fit, in our imaginary tomorrow…
Drugs are de facto legalized in many places around the world. Kabul, and Tijuana for example. No. Not marijuana. How would you prevent the massive healthcare cost associated with those possible situations?
Great writing, and reporting. Ya summed up a lot of it and well. The few critiques I have about the piece are probably for another article? But Im gonna list em, when Marcela Turati brought up the need for intl observers/ investigators; it would have been a great time to bring up the 43 missing student teacher protestor people. Very few people in the USA know about the outcome of the intl investigation into the series of events that night. Many people I talk with, still believe the mayor guy or his wife is to blame for that one. Another part of this saga that didn’t quite make it into this piece was the failure of an assault on New Generation Jalisco. Was that last summer? The other thing I thought should be brought up, actually upset me more to not find in the comment section than the article, Fast n Furious? Now again, Im not a lawyer, and none of us knows how many assault rifles, how much ammo etc, Dronebama forced gundealers in Tx and Az to provide to known cartel members? But Doug, Mona, RR? Is there a chance that beginning with an actual investigation into that scheme, could a solid conspiracy case be built with this many years of obviousness? Maybe not conspiracy I dont know, anything?
Why not boycott all of Mexico’s beautiful vacation destinations that magically seem to be safe and devoid of violence? I am so sick of hearing about everyone’s cheap Cancun get- away’s, while people with real courage: independent journalists, & moral Mexican citizens live in what seems to be a Sicilian- style dystopia, with 21st century brutality.
I pledge to never vacation there. We would change the face of Mexico overnight if Marijuana was legalized federally, aid withheld, and tourism boycotted. They’re major export is drugs and what legitimate companies that are there control the tourism industries.
(; Actually the beautiful destinations – they really are not safe. You just don’t hear about it, maybe once in a blue moon.
Oh, well maybe they have gotten worse then, but it could not possibly be what is described in this article; mass graves and carnage in border towns, hanging corpes in Juarez…etc
Well, it’s pretty bad. You mentioned Cancun – aside from the reef having been destroyed, Lydia Cacho covered the land disputes where people were being forced out at gunpoint, some of them disappearing. Cabo is a disaster…you might want to check out Zeta, Proceso, and Animal Politico for updates.
Still I cannot understand how foreigners can stay at insulated 5* Hotels and relax when there is so much horror and carnage throughout the country.
As far as camping in Baja like the good old days under the stars or on the beaches, forget about it. Not safe.
A little update on Cancun from today:
Hallan 2 cuerpos dentro de maletas en Cancun
http://www.frontera.info/EdicionEnLinea/Notas/Nacional/16062017/1226165-Hallan-2-cuerpos-dentro-de-maletas-en-Cancun.html
I remember saying to people who were so jazzed to go there – this was on the wayback machine around 2005 at the DU: Don’t go there, that’s where the drug guys party.
As far as this land grab covered by Lydia Cacho in Cancun, it is run by the real estate mafia – and real estate is a prime example of money laundering schemes throughout Mexico. So you might have thought – what does real estate have to do with the “so called drug-war”? Everything.
Wow, thanks, this is what I love about TI & comments section.
Five days behind here as usual. You’re welcome – BTW the land grab at Cancun was to develop & build more posh hotels. (;
Clearly, all drug war violence is produced by the drug war. The people who are responsible for all this violence are those who support this war such as all drug fighters and illegalizers. All this violence can be ended by ending the drug war. All medicine (drugs) should be legal. The public has been so brain-washed by drug war propaganda, they have become brain-dead. Has anyone ever heard of Al Capone and Elliot Ness? Does anyone know what happened when drug fighters and illegalizers were authorized to assault, rob, and arrest millions of innocent alcohol consumers, producers, and dealers who had never harmed anyone or violated anyone’s rights? I will help you. All that government violence and crime produced an equal amount of private violence and crime.
Thank you for an excellent report, keep ’em coming !
If drug cartels had a lobbyist firm, would it be legal? they certainly have the money.
Corruption is a social disease. It is contagious and spreads like cancer, by travel and touch.
Notice however in the US the publication of corruption DOES NOT HAPPEN until AFTER the corruption is charged. There is no corruption in washington dc, none. That $600 million, the MURDER OF SETH RICH, the CIA funding of terrorists, trap setting for fraudulent economic practices of wallstreet thieves supported by lawmakers…. nah. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption. There is no corruption.
Ha, yes we are the example to so many “lesser” nation-states.
114 Mexican journalists killed for investigating politicians since 2000? I think our news people (“journalists” would be a stretch) have received the message. No investigations of politicians, just polly-parrot what the CIA feeds you.
With all the name dropping of what the US has added to the Mexican drug culture mix, and our brilliant strategies offered from Iraq and Afghanistan, seems very likely that the US is broadly directing the actions of the cartels. Lots of money at stake.
It’s time for some courageous, concerned US citizens to start taking a stand and offer themselves up as human shields the same as was done in Columbia during the worst of its state sponsored massacres.
You first….
But seriously-why don’t you join me and others as we take a stand HERE in the US against these unconstitutional, ADL sponsored terror events that are planned at the local police station houses?
Omar Mateen and many others are stalked, harassed and bullied by Anti Defamation League sponsored “community policing” initiatives for YEARS long before they go on a rampage.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/14/us/orlando-shooting.html?_r=0
There can be no freedom there if we don’t take a stand here, first.
These journalist are truly brave men. And if there are any organizations that help victims like Valdez, i would love to donate.
In the U.S., a precedent was set many years ago with the united effort of the media to destroy Gary Webb. In 1988, Senate concil headed by John Kerry concluded that the CIA had been complicit in the cocaine trafficking by the Contras. It was government record. Gary Webb simply took the “abstract” fact of CIA involvement with cocaine trafficking (which was government record) and through investigation showed real world consequences as it pertained to Los Angeles. How did the media establishment reward Gary Webb for his bravery and good investigative work? By destroying his career, and discrediting the man.
LA times alone assigned 17 individuals to work as a team to destroy Gary Webb. Was this the right reaction considering in 1988 it became government record of CIA involvement into drug trafficking to help fund the Contras overthrow of the Sandistas? Wouldn’t it be the responsibility of the LA times to instead use those 17 people to confirm Webb’s story and expand on it since the crack epidemic was in their back yard? But the LA times, NY times, Washington Post (you know the “liberal” media), MSNBC, CBS, etc. all made it a point to attack Webb.
Has anyone since really been brave enough to investigate obvious questions regarding drugs in the US? For example, is the major increase in Heroin use and death rates since 2001 correlated to the re-harvesting of opium after the fall of the Taliban in Afghanistan? If so, would that not be a logistical nightmare to traffic opium from Afghanistan? Maybe the rise in the US is simply due to Mexico growing more opium, as most media speculates but never actually investigates.
Long story short, if you decide to be a responsible journalist and investigate the dynamics of drugs and drug trafficking, expect to be rewarded with murder, like in Mexico, or having your career, and otherwise your livelihood destroyed if you are in the U.S.
Gary Webb! – a 2-shot suicide
Seth Rich – a robbery gone wrong
the clinton chronicles
That’s right. They traumatized Webb beyond belief, it was pure psychological terror. Miss the old Narco-News.
Lots of poppy fields here in the hills (Baja California); we believe this is a diversification by the cartels in anticipation of the legalization of the mota – this and much much more meth. Can you blame this recent flood of dope on the Mexicans? Nope. Our society feeds it, our society demands it. Until there are effective rehab and educational programs saturating the USA coast to coast, the demand will continue. And, don’t expect programs like that to be implemented anytime soon. The USA has to keep the drugs flowing one way or another – without the drug business, Mexico would completely fall apart. There simply are no opportunities for the Mexican people. The USA cannot afford to have an unstable country on its border, so nothing is going to change. Course, you could argue that Mexico is already unstable…journalists and others try to make that point here all the time, but eventually they vanish.
Take it a step further…the USA keeps the drug business alive to this day to enslave and subjugate the American population. There was a real reason why the CIA flooded the inner cities with cocaine – which turned to crack. Keep em stoned, they will not be a problem. It’s all very empire.
The subject of the so-called drug war has effectively been silenced in the US MSM/Corporate Press for the number one reason being the huge influence of business interests, i.e. tourism. Say anything and you are automatically branded an “alarmist” or a “nut.”
Take care.
Found this for you, pretty recent article:
Zeta – 05/22/17
Siembran mas amapola en Baja California
por, Ines Garcia Ramos
http://zetatijuana.com/2017/05/22/siembran-mas-amapola-en-baja-california/
Is there – anywhere at all in the world – an actual war on drugs?
As opposed to attacks on and prosecution of those who don’t pay off the relevant authorities?
There’s never been a war on “drugs.” The war has long been waged on some people who use some drugs.
Thank you for this article. What a brave man to put his duty over his own safety.
I second that.
This is one case where the people have even more culpability than the government. I mean, the U.S. paid that $2.6 billion since 2008. And they waste $40 billion internally on drug enforcement. But the drug users fork over even more – $100 billion a year!
All that money goes the same place in the end: enforcers who prohibit cartels’ competitors, thugs who go after cartels with great fanfare, politicians who talk up a storm for Prohibition. Who can even tell which is the cop and which is the criminal? The cops pretend to be crooks and license friendly crooks and give them impunity, the criminals have badges and break down your door and kidnap you pretending to be police.
You can lie by idly and pretend to be a hippie as you smoke your bloodstained cartel dope — with a drop of a murdered man’s blood for every $50 spent, do the math! Lady Macbeth can’t wash that shit away. But I say you’re not doing real counterculture recreation unless you’re growing your own or mixing up your own, and if that’s not your interest, or if you are too afraid, then just admit it and find some other way to be nonconformist! But don’t go out and try to pretend that you can hand over your fortune to thugs to dominate the market that collects from you, and then turn around and think you’re so badass free-spirited. That’s not how it works.
Pro-drug, anti-drug, it’s all nonsense. What matters is being against the thugs with guns who ruin lives and censor what people write —- no matter WHO they say they are.
Oh FFS. Knock off the nonsense about adults who choose to use mood-altering substances. My grandparents drank during beverage alcohol Prohibition. I suppose that means they helped Al Capone slaughter people?
You know what kills more people than drugs? Drug laws.
Thank you, Mona.
There was no “drug problem” and no drug crimes until drugs were outlawed.
Before the Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914 any adult in the US could buy and sell and use any opiate they wanted without any prohibition: morphine, opium, heroin etc.
There was a famous cocaine infused wine drink that was popular all over the world and enjoyed by people from all walks of life during the latter part of the 19th Century.
Adults then were treated as adults by the state, and not as though they were infants as they are now.
Any one wanting a profound understanding of this never ending drug war might enjoy a book by Thomas Szasz published in 1973 and reissued in 2004; and I would say more relevant today than it was 40years ago.
The title is: “Ceremonial Chemistry: The Ritual Persecution of Drugs, Drug Addicts, and Pushers”.
Not to mention, the hippies he so hates are too snobbish to smoke Mexican weed. Oh, and also the fact that other non-cannabis drugs provide the greater share of cartel profits, even more so after state legalization has been increasing.
I admire the hippies. But if you’ve read your history, then you should recall that hippies started out as impassioned idealists. Despite Ken Kesey’s best efforts, I gather the movement drew a lot more strength from the Southern Christian Leadership Conference than from any cabal of junkies. (you might argue other groups like the SDS and Black Panthers had a similar religious sense of devotion to their philosophies; in any case they were not just there to smoke dope) Even Ginsberg, poetic as he was, became notable more as the *ball* in a game of anti-censorship lawyers versus prudes, than in his own right. A philosophy of hedonism that doesn’t care who gets hurt in the process … that was what turned some “hippies” into scammers, yuppies, Republicans. And last but not least, remember that that was DESPITE the fact that in the 1960s, even the 1970s, there was not nearly so much drug violence as after Reagan got the ball rolling. Things are just different when reporters keep turning up dead, and a thousand others for each of them, and the money for the bullet came from the weed you smoked off the back of a mule.
OK, I agree with the last part about the yuppie sellout assholes, but the rest of your post is wrong. “[I]f you read your history?” How about actually being there?
There were two basic types of hippies: political types and those who were into sex drugs and rock & roll. Ever hear of the latter? They were at least as numerous as the former. But as with most things, this wasn’t a simple black & white; even the Yippies smoked pot, and all the party types that I knew hated Nixon, were anti-war, and were pro-civil rights.
Hippies didn’t generally have a philosophy of hedonism. Getting high was at least as much about consciousness expansion as about just having fun, though they were into having fun for sure.
And Ginsberg was more “notable as the *ball* in a game of anti-censorship lawyers versus prudes, than” as a poet? Wow, you must really run in some weird circles if that’s what you and yours think of Ginsberg. We read him in high school English class fer crissakes.
If they paid him money, then yes. If they made gin in their bathtub, then no.
sharp!
$7,000,000 a week
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4596212/The-American-wives-El-Chapo-s-henchmen-live-fear.html
Great article, Jesse Franzblau.
The problem with HVT is that the next in line is likely far worse; I thought this was common knowledge.
We will never accomplish anything good as long as the current regime (the US foreign policy establishment) is alive, entrenched, encouraged, funded, and accepted.
The rank hypocrisy continues.
Yes, we will get you to sell out your brothers and country. In trade, will grant your children the visas to come and educate and you can come and emigrate as well, “fils de familles” and all. When MS13 spills over, we will build bigger walls?
And the Vatican enforces more flesh for the ruger, sandw, and Taurus brands, as others.
Safety is what your taxes buy: the ability to pay and salary well public servants so they do not have to accept bribes or make a Living Wage by associating themselves to crime for income. So do not sell out your govern,ent for a “small” govern,ent power Bc this is what you get. Be grateful when you pay your taxes, they keep you rathersafe. Also, you can flush your toilet paper. Clint Eastwood uses roads and flushes his tp even though he says otherwise!
I’m more of the mind that Mexican politicians and officials are threatened with harm or death for not cooperating with the cartels, rather than they are in it for the money. I’m sure there is a greed factor for some, but a threat against a politician or their families by utterly ruthless, sociopathic criminals probably plays a much bigger role than a fatter paycheck. It would for me.
Right , that is the 1st step an then the 2nd–and the way to get out is cater to the us powers ultimately behind all this. We would not want our immigration asylums to be so obvious as a pay for play!
Agreed. Going against the cartels means your whole family ends up with their heads sawed off.
Ending prohibition would go a long way toward ending the cartels’ power to terrorize. But that would be far too sensible.
Yes, today’s Prohibition= War Against Drugs!