The White House chief strategist encouraged Trump’s racist tendencies but they were Trump’s to begin with, and they remain in the Oval Office after Bannon’s departure.
The writing was on the wall for Steve Bannon on Tuesday afternoon. Speaking in the gilded lobby of the Trump Tower in New York, the president of the United States took a short break from defending neo-Nazis and attacking “fake news” to comment on the future of his chief strategist — who he pointedly refused to call “Steve.”
“Look, I like Mr. Bannon,” Trump told reporters. “He is a friend of mine, but Mr. Bannon came on very late. You know that. I went through 17 senators, governors, and I won all the primaries. Mr. Bannon came on very much later than that, and I like him.” Trump added: “We’ll see what happens with Mr. Bannon.”
Well, it didn’t take long: Bannon, as of Friday morning, is out, six months after his controversial switchover from Trump campaign chief executive to White House chief strategist. He joins Gen. Michael Flynn, Reince Priebus, Sean Spicer, Katie Walsh, and Anthony Scaramucci on the outside. As Oscar Wilde nearly remarked: to lose one member of your inner circle may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose six in six months looks like sheer chaos.
Let’s be clear: Trump’s sacking of “Mr. Bannon” is not a repudiation of Bannon-esque, or Breitbartian, white nationalism. Rather, it is a clear consequence of Bannon, like Icarus flying too close to the sun. As Trump’s remarks on Tuesday indicated, he wanted to make clear to the world that he is his own man — or, as he once declaimed in an early-morning tweet: “I call my own shots.” For the thin-skinned, egomaniacal, and attention-hungry president, White House staffers have only one mission: to boost him, not themselves.
Thanks to relentless leaking from inside the White House, we have known for some time that Trump has been bothered by the rise and rise of Bannon. He was annoyed by the Time magazine cover story that asked whether the chief strategist was now “the second most powerful man in the world.” He was irritated by the #PresidentBannon hashtag on Twitter and upset over the SNL sketch showing Bannon running the White House while the president sits at a kid’s desk playing with toys. And, in recent days, Trump was angered by the much-discussed new book by Joshua Green, “Devil’s Bargain,” which suggests that it was the former Breitbart boss who paved the way for Trump’s shock victory over Hillary Clinton. “That fucking Steve Bannon taking credit for my election,” Trump recently told a friend, according to BuzzFeed News.
For the Narcissist-in-Chief, who perhaps values and cherishes his electoral college win more than he does four of his five children, it was the final nail in Bannon’s coffin. Whatever else you say or do, don’t you dare take credit away from The Donald!
History, however, will remember the hiring, not the firing, of Bannon. How on God’s green earth did a U.S. president bring into his White House as chief strategist a man who proudly called his Breitbart news site “the platform for the alt-right”; published pieces on Breitbart during his tenure as executive chairman, with headlines, such as “Would You Rather Your Child Had Feminism or Cancer?” and “Political Correctness Protects Muslim Rape Culture”; allegedly objected to the number of “whiny” Jews at his daughters’ school; took inspiration from notorious Nazi propagandist Leni Riefenstahl; produced a closing ad for the Trump presidential campaign that, according to the Anti-Defamation League, used “images and rhetoric” that “anti-Semites have used for ages”; suggested disenfranchising black voters might not be “such a bad thing”; said he wanted women who “lead this country” to “be feminine” rather than “a bunch of dykes … from the 7 Sisters schools”; declared “Islam is not a religion of peace” but “a religion of submission” and also called it “the most radical” religion in the world; warned that the U.S. could turn into the “Islamic States of America” and dubbed American Muslim organizations a “Fifth Column”; seemed to approvingly cite Italian fascist thinker Julius Evola; repeatedly nodded to a “stunningly racist French novel” called “The Camp of the Saints” that warns of a migrant invasion of the West; expressed admiration for the anti-Semitic French philosopher and hero to the European far right, Charles Maurras; joined the controversial and secretive Council for National Policy, alongside extremists, who according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, “regularly defame LGBT people with utter falsehoods” and “describe Latino immigrants as … rapists and disease-carriers”; and whose White House appointment in January was welcomed by America’s leading white nationalists and neo-Nazis, including David Duke and Peter Brimelow, who called it “excellent” and “amazing”?
The answer is pretty simple and straightforward: Trump shares Bannon’s worldview. Or as the New York Times’ Glenn Thrush tweeted: “Ultimately you don’t need a Bannon when you are a Bannon.”
Look, the Great Manipulator, as Time called Bannon, may have encouraged Trump’s worst, most crude, most bigoted tendencies — but they were Trump’s tendencies to begin with. The White House chief strategist, for instance, was reportedly one of the key architects of the “Muslim ban”, but does anyone seriously expect that ban to be lifted now he is gone? Remember: the president was promising a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States” in December 2015, long before Bannon joined Team Trump.
The Leader of the Free World has form on nativism, xenophobia, and racism, as I have pointed out before. Consider the past few days: Bannon may have influenced Trump’s response to the domestic terror attack in Charlottesville, but he did not force Trump to provoke howls of outrage across Capitol Hill, the business community, and the wider West on Tuesday by referring to the “very fine people” on the neo-Nazi, KKK-aligned side; nor did Bannon dictate Trump’s dog-whistling tweet on Thursday praising the “beauty” of Confederate monuments.
Yes, Bannon has finally gone and we can all rejoice. Sebastian Gorka and maybe even Stephen Miller might eventually follow him out of the White House doors. But Trump remains. That’s the inescapable, unavoidable, undeniable problem; that’s the orange-skinned gorilla in the room. I hate to agree with Trump but Bannon or no Bannon, John Kelly or no John Kelly, the president does indeed call his own shots. Especially the racist ones.
Top photo: Steve Bannon follows President Donald Trump into the Oval Office at the White House on Feb. 24, 2017 in Washington.
Explain Bigotry. For a FAKE NEWS Character you come off demonstrating a lack of comprehension of the WORD – BIGOTRY.
Maybe you were thinking about BIG Old TREES!
An secret Environmentalist in Journalist attire. WHAT AN ACT?
Hopefully they ban Articles of Confederation thereby banning perpetual union, and just refer to it as appropriate:
the constitution which shall not be spoken of;
the constitution which shall not be seen; or
the constitution which shall not be read aloud.
“Steve Bannon Is Gone, But Left His Cooties in the White House”
by Mehdi Hasan
Except that there is more evidence of cooties.
So Mehdi , wouldn’t you agree , it is time now to change the colour of the White house ?
HOLA! Yo, the majority of the construction workers were BLACK. Specific COLOR of the House is not mentioned in the CONSTITUTION. It could be up for discussion. You would not have any problem with that, would you?
Playing the pseudo bigotey card loser Hassan?
Total libtard on display. You’re so full of fecal material.
Gluten Tag! You learn fast. There is good and FINE people in all sides and MEHDI HASSAN is one of them that our President talked out it.
Maybe the alt-right got its ideas from F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby?
Scientific racism – very popular in the U.S. in the 1920s, 1930s, but took a beating after the Nazis tried to overrun the world trumpeting the same ideology – that’s the banner the Bannons & their allies march under.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madison_Grant
theres always a few that come around but you and milton are both really good at what you do here– hopefully that doesn’t come across as sarcasm. I think hostile places like this can make it hard to tell.
Anyway, I hope you both have something else going on suitable to your talents or are going in that direction. A mind is a terrible thing to waste on the internet, or somesuch
I wanted to end this on a positive -ish note. The real world has been calling. I think I got out everything I wanted to say anyway. Good Luck
I read Breitbart regularly, especially the comment streams because they are more useful than the journalism on display. I think Trump is finally in trouble. A group of people that have enthusiastically supported him from the beginning now sound confused and disappointed. If he loses the Breitbart crowd, it’s really over.
on the other side of that coin is the GOY JOB.
good ‘ol non-racist huffpost did that one and what is that if it isn’t a peculiar form of racism?
BE GOY’N WITH YOU.
How is that for a funny?
I almost cant’ hear you over the sound of your pearl clutching.
“Oh, I do say Ester, that awful man is surely in for his come uppance now! The nerve of that man to just say all the offensive and insensitive things, it just isn’t civilized you see!”
What kind of serious news editor let’s a writer refer to Trump as the Narcissist-in-Chief?
Mr. Hasan: if you really want to make an awesome point here are some suggestions for what you can call Trump next: Cysgender-in-Chief, WASP-in-Chief, One-Percent-in-Chief, Racist-Sexist-in-Chief, White-Male-in-Chief, Chief-Bigot, Nazi-in-Chief, White-Nationalist-in-Chief, Liar-in-Chief, Chief-Unsensitive-Guy, Pussy-Grabber-in-Chief…I’m sure you can come up with something even better.
Couldn’t agree more, glad to see someone else point this out. I come to The Intercept when I want to look through the left-leaning lens specifically because it’s usually above the shrill character-attacking attitude that seems to characterise most ‘journalism’ on the ‘left’ recently. It induces eye-rolling to see something like ‘Narcissist-in-Chief’ from a publication I’ve come to expect a more sober attitude from – would really expect something like this from a place like Alternet (lol). Don’t get me wrong, I’m hardly going out of my way to defend dj trump’s character, but it’s exasperating to come across something like this from TI. But this is actually the first time I’ve come here in maybe a month, and this is the first article I’ve read. Hopefully not an omen of a turn toward the trantrum-throwing that seems to characterise most of ‘left-leaning journalism’ these days…
As an addition to my previous reply, have a look at TI’s commenting policy: “While debate is encouraged, name-calling is not. Commenters should strive to attack the substance of arguments, rather than the person who is making them.” Maybe the same should apply to the people writing the articles…
I love this publication, but it’s specifically because it usually /avoids/ this kind of tone.
NAMASTE! The kind, that knows that Mr. Hassan was not making a JOKE or trying to be FUNNY he was listening to about 62% of the population and watching COFEFE-in- Chief and reporting it.
I am not sure what SafixVeridi was smoking, but it seems to be pretty clear as an outsider, that racism is still a vexing problem despite the gains that have made since 1865. I wouldn’t claim that it isn’t a problem anywhere else because it is. Substitute African Americans for aboriginal or First Nations peoples and you have the situation in Canada. I don’t doubt that not all of Trump’s supporters are racist, but they did vote for the racist. Medhi is right on this article and I hope that he stays around to upset members of the far right for as long time to come.
I would suggest to you, that there were millions of people voted for Trump who did not have a racist bone in their body. Maybe they just hated Hillary more.
And you are engaging in the same stupid some/all fallacy that caused Hillary to lose the election. Stop assuming are people racist if you don’t know them or their philosophy, it’s unethical.
And it is exactly why we are having chaos now in this country.
The incongruities of corruption and fraud and turmoil have little to nothing to do with left/right. The real problem is the lack of individuality and a perverted insistence on pushing groups. Political whores and warmongers love to groupify people because they actually have no single personal courage – they act more like insects.
Hasan is 0 for 2 in his last articles. Nothing new added or reported in this piece; makes The Intercept sound like MSNBC. What’s next? “Trump sexually harasses women” ?
Trump fricking does sexually harass women….. But people like you could watch a video of him physically doing it (since that’s the ONLY thing missing) and you’d still say it wasn’t him, not his fault, or some other bullshit excuse……. Enjoy defending a sexual predator. Jeeze I hate how this president is showing me how many people I don’t want to be around or feel safe around……
Thank god, another stamp collection of right wing lunatic tweets. It’s a living, I guess.
gee, yet another bashing of or by the goy?
I won’t feel sorry for the first masked commie-nazi (e.g. ANTIFA) that ever messes with me.
Is anybody else sick and tired of hearing the words ‘racism’ and ‘bigotry’ thrown about in almost every conversation about our country?
The words are now meaningless. They used to be used carefully, sparingly, because it is a terrible insult to swing at someone unless you knew them intimately.
Now, almost every liberal tars and smears people who don’t agree with them politically. They smear people they haven’t met, haven’t talked with, haven’t the least understanding with, and don’t bother because it is a so much more fun to tar and feather Americans en masse.
I say SHAME on the Democrats. They have been using this shtick for some time now. True racism is rare. Thank God. If you lean center right you are now lumped together with the Nazi alt-Right.
Sick of it. Sick of their own bigotry that purports that they know what they are saying, but don’t. This country is never going to heal and go forward unless and until we all understand that all of us are allowed an opinion and that opinion may or may not jive with everybody else’s. We can trust, at the core, that most of us want good for this country.
The specious use of the words, “racism’ and “bigotry” should be used rarely and only in specific circumstances of something provable. THe vast majority of Americans are not racist. They are too busy trying to make ends meet, and find this new culture war that the Left started not only tiresome, but revolting.
So I read now that Hillary gave millions toward the ‘resistance.’ She is the primary reason the Dems lost the WH, because of her smearing of good, working class people whose only fault is that they were born white.
She doubled down, the Dems are joining her, and maybe they will need to see more defeat politically before someone in their party acts like an adult.
I am a former Democrat and I am disgusted.
Totally agree. I wrote a comment just like yours for Hasan’s last article. I’m a lifelong liberal, protested the Iraq War on many occasions, have done media productions to spread awareness about the different ethnicities in America, marched for farmworker rights, gone to Black Panther speaking events, BA degree in American cultural studies, tutored children whose parents are Spanish-speaking migrant farm workers, etc. I think you’re completely right.
The “alt-right” wasn’t even a term formulated by the far right.
“Alt-right” was first dropped in speeches by First Lady Clinton on the 2016 campaign trail, and within days the white supremacist Richard Spencer’s name (a loser nobody’d ever heard of) was appended to it, with him bragging pointlessly he’d been using the term for years.
But no far-righters/libertarians/Christian patriots/liberty movement adherents had ever used it. And they’re not white supremacists.
Globalists are hard at work trying confuse the population by attempting to use “far right” and “alt-right” interchangeably and equating them both with racism.
All they’re achieving is pissing off the same Trump voters who will hand leftists their hats again in 2018.
I agree that racist, sexist, fascist et al have been abused as generic attack terms, but not because there isn’t tons of hate in our country. The Clinton campaign lobbed these insults at both Sanders and Trump – it was one of their main techniques. I think the accusations could have been backed up a little more easily against the latter. Using then indiscrimately just makes them useless.
The constant drumbeat of hearing the Democrats yell, racism, is starting to make people become numb. It is not that they hate racists, but it is getting to the point where push is coming to shove.
The Clintons, both she and he, have used racial stereotypes and insults against them; somehow the liberals forget this.
Human beings are tribal. When I worked in a high school, I noticed that the black kids sat with black kids, the Asians sat with Asians, the white with whites, the Indians with Indians, etc.. This is not racism. It is simply most humans gravitate to those that they feel most comfortable with.
Real racism is shocking and vulgar. And we know it when we see it. The author feels Trump is a racist by association, yet we know that there are blacks who support him and who know him and say he is not. Silver spoon? Sure, and for people like him, it would be difficult to understand the plight of others.
I think I meant to say, ‘….it isnot that they don’t hate racists…”
sorry.
“true racism is rare” — how do you know that? based on what?
“THe vast majority of Americans are not racist. ” — once again how do you know that? Have you read the comments on right wing sites like Brietbart?
Just look up the search “Everyone is racist” it science saying we all have biases. So just because someone doesn’t do a nazi salute or wears a white hood doesn’t mean he wouldn’t be upset if his daughter started dating a black guy.
Conversely, how do YOU know they are? Because they didn’t vote for corrupt Hillary? I am saying that the drift from the Left is now relegated to accusing almost everyone that didn’t vote for the Democrats this year must be ‘racist.”
Did you not hear Corrupt Hillary calling out millions of Americans ‘deplorables?’ She didn’t bother to go to their town and cities and speak with them. She didn’t bother to understand their needs and desires, but ASSUMED they were ‘racists’….
A Racist makes an unadulterated posture concerning the color of the skin, the religious persuasion, the ethnicity of a person, with undisguised hate. The neo-Nazis made no attempt to hide their naked racism. We can call them racists and bigots.
I have gone to Brietbart occasionally and I read some racist comments. I also read liberal sites and there are bigots aplenty there as well. Bigotry can wear a lot of different disguises.
Calling people names when you don’t know what is in their hearts and minds is wrong. It is unethical and it shows a laziness to confronting honesty.
Because THAT is what we need today more than all this incessant talk about racism…HONESTY. Where is it? It is gone. We now assume someone’s heart without bothering to see what’s really in it.
I have worked in the public sector my whole life. I will say I met a handful of racists who made no bones about what they believe. But if you have white skin now, you are Assumed to be Racist. It’s guesswork, nothing more.
And we are on the wrong path… if we want our country to work, we need to assume that most Americans are not racist.
And once again, millions voted for Trump because they preferred giving him the benefit of doubt, rather than HRC who they knew already to be filled with contempt for those that thought differently from her. We knew exactly who she was… an unindicted felon who used and abused her public office for personal gain.
And take a look back at what Bill and Hillary said about blacks. They are lauded as lovely liberals, but their comments revealed racism. Start with your side and clean it up before you take on the others.
Therein lies the rub: the constant usage of these terms to slander people wantonly has made most Americans numb to their effect. If anything, the demonizing makes any attempt by people across both aisles to come to a mutual understanding that much more difficult, because one side has been unjustly cast as “the enemy” in the mainstream narrative.
Yes, that is exactly the problem. I think the Dems are going to have their hat handed to them again and again and again, until they understand there is real racism , but smearing everyone who doesn’t agree with them in political viewpoints is something else entirely…an aberration.
Marxist presstitutes have attempted to slander all conservatives and white groups as being racists, by linking them with the KKK/Nazis. The problem is that they’ve done this while employing blatant double-standards and playing loose with the facts. Incidentally, the only thing they’ve really accomplished is isolated themselves that much more and emboldened the white nationalists to stand up to their bullying tactics. Have a look around at political discussions in neutral corners and what do you see? Tons of pushback. At least I try to keep the discussion rational and intellectual. Some of the discussions get very ugly and very quickly from both sides. I won’t even bother to repeat it here.
Totally agree.
how very alt-pc–who knew the Republicans were so sensitive about words and cared so much about the success of democrats.
Uniting the Right for government power means White Supremacists, Nationalists, Nazis, with Atheists and those who are not — all wear each others clothes.
You don’t get to argue that you’re not connected and how unfair it all is that you’re being treated like you are when at the same time you’re stating that you’re united.
the complaints here sound like someone intending to justify staging a attack.
Hopefully I’m wrong.
ok now I’ve said everything I felt I needed to say on this site
Interested to hear your opinion on the term ‘deplorables’ ? A way of classifying voters into a subspecies ? Opposed to ‘draining the swamp’ of the Washington elitist ubermensch.
You said it best. To call an entire group of voters ‘deplorables’ reveals the inner contempt the Democrats now have for anyone who does not walk the same walk as they do. What Hillary did was disgusting. In fact, I do not remember any Presidential wannabe who smeared Americans while running for the office. She was a first.
But she could not hide it. The contempt is still there, brimming right under the surface. I had been on liberal blogs for years and read the contempt there, until I stopped. I knew who they were, or at least, so many of them now.
This new meme of calling out anyone who disagrees on the way the country is run as racists is appalling, and dangerous. They know what they are doing. Draining the swamp to my mind is to make sure the globalists are exposed. Globalism ‘s goal is to destroy any vestige of a sovreign county, to destroy the middle class, so that the uber wealthy run the world.
They despise patriotism. But in its purist form, patriotism is the love of our country, working on it to make it better, and correct our errors. I fly the flag every day, but now I hope I don’t wake up to someone who would try to stop me doing that. I fly the flag because it symbolizes the struggle of all good Americans to put country first, and do what best for all of us.
It reminds us that we still have the freedoms we revere and honor. And people died for those freedoms.
You can add the word Nazi to that list.
If everybody is a Nazi, nobody is a Nazi.
These words are meaningless and grate my ears.
If you call everyone a rapist,when someone is actually raped,
why would anyone believe them?
If you call everyone a rapist,
when someone is actually raped,
why would anyone believe them?
I’m so sick to death of hearing Racist, Bigot, Nazi.
They’ve overplayed their hand and those words mean nothing to nobody.
While I’m no longer supporting Trump,
the only reason I would vote for him again
is because of the name calling, identity politics, and
promotion of violence.
The Democrats HATE white people and men
and encourage Americans to blow monuments up
and punch people if they look like a Nazi.
Communism is here.
And maybe we should usher it in..
because the first people to be hit by firing squad will be people like
Hasan and his name calling, race-baiting jihad.
Once communists take control,
those are the first people to go.
I obviously am not endorsing communism,
but illustrating how absolutely ignorant people like Hasan
and his Jihad of name callers is….
Hasan and his thought police Jihad feel entitled, and part of an elite culture, but what he doesn’t realize as George Carlin once said,
“the elite has a club, and you ain’t in it.”
Hasan and his thought police jihad are what the elite call:
USEFUL IDIOTS.
The problem with any radical extremist group isn’t that their numbers are far below majority, but that they have enough distributed numbers that can be a tipping point. It happened in the last election and they are gaining strength now because the majority are paralyzed and in a delusion fed by complete disbelief that this could actually be happening.
When you look at the faces in the pictures of the people that protested the white supremacist rally in Boston you will notice they were overwhelmingly white. The ratio of anti-white supremacist protesters to white supremacists was reported to be at least fifteen to one. This fact shows that Americans actually stand together against racism and bigotry, which is something we should be proud of as a people.
What we should not be proud of as a people is that we are naively so quick to protest against each other’s failings as opposed to coming out both relentlessly and consistently to protest against the true oppressors of “We the People”, which are the banksters, corporatocracy, and their treasonous bought and paid for political/judicial servants.
We as a people now have to take it further than what the Quakers did in refusing to doff their hats to their social superiors since they tried at all times to promote a spiritual equality. We need to do far more as those in authority have done far more over time to place the masses in a state of indentured servitude not seen since before the American Revolution. Those in authority utilize polarization in their strategy to keep the masses focused on anything other than their efforts to maintain dominance.
Frank Sinatra Lyrics
“The House I live In”
What is America to me?
A name, a map, or a flag I see?
A certain word, “democracy”?
What is America to me?
The house I live in, a plot of earth, a street
The grocer and the butcher, and the people that I meet
The children in the playground, the faces that I see
All races and religions, that’s America to me
The place I work in, the worker by my side
The little town or city where my people lived and died
The “howdy” and the handshake, the air of feeling free
And the right to speak my mind out, that’s America to me
The things I see about me, the big things and the small
The little corner newsstand and the house a mile tall
The wedding in the churchyard, the laughter and the tears
The dream that’s been a-growin’ for a hundred and fifty years
The town I live in, the street, the house, the room
The pavement of the city, or a garden all in bloom
The church, the school, the clubhouse, the millions lights I see
But especially the people
That’s America to me
http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=2306
Skip annoying 3 second ad:
https://youtu.be/vhPwtnGviyg?list=SRfrank%20sinatra%20the%20house%20i%20live%20in
Antifa is all white. Biggest racists of them all.
Boston’s gathering was a Free Speech Rally.
The left puts Free Speech in scare quotes. Every Unitarian and Paulist from the western suburbs and every faithless Cantabrigian shows up to denounce the First Amendment as Nazism.
Nice job.
Frank Sinatra Lyrics
“The House I Live In”
What is America to me?
A name, a map, or a flag I see?
A certain word, “democracy”?
What is America to me?
The house I live in, a plot of earth, a street
The grocer and the butcher, and the people that I meet
The children in the playground, the faces that I see
All races and religions, that’s America to me
The place I work in, the worker by my side
The little town or city where my people lived and died
The “howdy” and the handshake, the air of feeling free
And the right to speak my mind out, that’s America to me
The things I see about me, the big things and the small
The little corner newsstand and the house a mile tall
The wedding in the churchyard, the laughter and the tears
The dream that’s been a-growin’ for a hundred and fifty years
The town I live in, the street, the house, the room
The pavement of the city, or a garden all in bloom
The church, the school, the clubhouse, the millions lights I see
But especially the people
That’s America to me
See Song facts where you can scroll down and see the movie presentation after three seconds you can skip an annoying ad:
http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=2306
Fascinating profile of Donald Trump from Newsweek in 1987: “Citizen Trump”
http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-has-never-had-any-friends-likes-speak-his-family-every-day-652138
What I take away from this 30 year old profile.
Whatever faults Trump might have, he’s in no way the caricature of a raving lunatic that the liberal MSM makes him out to be.
He is very much a quintessential American billionaire with all his faults, but when did a saint ever achieve what Donald Trump has.
On June 16, 2015, he committed the sin of running for the office of President of the United States as a non-initiate.
exactly.
They only fault-find those who are not members of the CFR
Now the real story why Bannon had been sacked instead of reading nonsensical media coverage.
1. For 20 years now there exists a symbiotic relationship between China’s trade surplus with US & the recycling of this surplus as hot money being transferred to bonds & money markets at Wall Street.
2. This relationship creates high yield prospects for both parties.
3. Problem: it in effect deindustrializes the US.
4. Bannon had announced since day one he would sever this relationship as his plan is to reindustrialize US. Economic nationalism etc. opposed to the business as usual by traditional Rs & Ds as their biggest donors are portfolio investors, banks, equity funds etc.
5. Bannon had prepared several proposals to impose trade tariffs on import of Chinese consumer durables
6. China has recently announced they would retaliate by denouncing dollar seignorage. They are being inundated by the biggest home market private debt crisis, Bannon would have pushed the country over the edge.
7. Wall Street went nuts.
As if Charlottesville is the real reason. Come on. :-) Bannon is an authoritarian hardliner and a danger to any democratic civil society, but he had in fact read literature on this matter. The man is not a conspiracy nut, he is a man with an articulated and actually rational plan (you can agree with it or not, other story). The man has reinvented Murdoch’s propaganda model.
Ps. Great coincidence China suddenly has agreed to keep North Korea in an economic stranglehold. What are the odds?
Populism & Racism go hand in hand across the Globe.
Where Populism is merely a nice word for all kinds of nationalistic bullshit.
Like Hitler and all morons alike they stigmatize cultures to create an electorate for them. Which makes clear that they have nothing to bring to the table.
And now lets see how many of these boxes Trump ticks…..
_”Victim of Communism Exposes the Leftist Agenda“_
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poUDa8YotXI
“Bulgarian man gives dire warning to U.S. about the dangers of communism.”
Someone’s been in having a Rip Van Winkle nap since 1955 and just woke up. . . Could it be Joe McCarthy? What does Ed Murrow have to say about that. . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIkU4MMQZ54
An ignorant hate-filled political opportunist with a secret opiate addiction problem . . . That sure sounds like Steve Bannon.
The communists-in-waiting on your side of the aisle go around attacking people for exercising free speech, tearing down historical monuments just because they don’t like them (would you mind if we did the same thing with whatever we deemed to be “hateful”?) and slandering anyone who doesn’t acquiesce to the Marxist agenda. You claim Bannon has a “secret opiate addiction problem,” yet liberals certainly aren’t strangers to drug abuse. You want to talk about ignorant, hate-filled political opportunists? Maria Chappelle-Nadal made a Facebook post calling for the assassination of Trump, while Marco Rubio basically is calling for violence against those who refuse to conform to the PC mantra, tweeting about the alt-right Charlottesville protestors, “When entire movement built on anger & hatred towards people different than you, it justifies & ultimately leads to violence against them.” Both parties are completely corrupt and serve the same master which is drunk with power.
Yes, both parties have major corruption problems – thanks to Citizens United, which was pushed through by Republicans on the Supreme Court, and which the likes of Hillary Clinton relied on heavily for fund-raising.
That doesn’t change the fact that the alt-right is a pack of pro-Nazi ideologues exhibiting the worst kind of racist ignorance; the very same ideology that led to major atrocities around the world. And Confederate monuments set up in the 1920s by the KKK types? How is that any different from Germany erecting statues of Nazi generals today?
You and your crew of neo-Nazi fanatics are a sad frightened group, but also a real threat to American principles – and it’s time you learned that you have no place here. Nobody will give you a job, nobody will associate with you, nobody will give you the time of day no matter how many stupid little events you stage. Go home and sulk, or even better, grow up.
lol They’re not “my crew” of neo-Nazi fanatics. Do you even understand what being a Nazi entails? It means being pro-socialist (which is a leftist political ideology FYI), pro-Hitler and pro-bigotry – none of which I am. Again, you’re just setting up a straw man in order to knock it down. Radical leftists are the ones provoking hostilities with anyone who doesn’t agree with their world view and you have no way of refuting this fact, so all you can do is slander to the point where it doesn’t even phase me nor anyone else.
To your last point, pretty much every big companies that are openly PC-Marxist have outsourced American jobs to third-world countries just so that their CEOs can exploit the people there for pennies on the dollar and lavish themselves with huge bonuses. Not only that, they’re actively looking to hire H1-B visa-carrying foreigners over legal American citizens for the exact same reason. If that’s not racist and anti-American to its core then I don’t know what is. In closing, I don’t give a damn whether or not an exploitative company doesn’t hire me, because I wouldn’t work for them anyway.
P.S. Most of the Transatlantic Slave Trade was done from the North-East, i.e. Union territories. General Lee was opposed to slavery, yet that didn’t stop the historically-illiterate, brainwashed ANTIFA from throwing a hissy fit for the world to see in order to have his statue removed.
When I saw the headline, I was convinced that this was going to be a Robert Mackey article. But it’s bad just the same. The media don’t hound people out of office for being bigots. They hound people out of office for obstructing the perpetual war agenda.
Huffington Post goes racist on resignation of Steve Bannon …
Meanwhile, this is how Huffington Post reacts to Bannon’s resignation: Goy (plural “goyim”) is the Hebrew pejorative word for a non-Jew.
goyim (cattle) – AZL Home
The term ‘Goy’ (plural goyim) referring to non-Jews actually means cattle as expressed in the Talmud ‘The goyim are not human they are beasts’ [Baba Mazia …
Urban Dictionary: goy
Hebrew and Yiddish term for a non-Jewish person; synonymous with “gentile.” Usually neutral, despite persistent untrue rumors that it is derogatory…
The Term “Goy”
The Term “Goy” Written by Gil Student . It is frequently claimed that the term “Goy” (pl. goyim or goyyim) means “animal” and is therefore a derogatory term.
Definition: Goy – JewFAQ
Goy Lit. nation. A non-Jew, that is, a member of one of the other nations. There is nothing inherently insulting about the term; the word “goy” is used in the Torah …
Judaism 101: Jewish Attitudes Toward Non-Jews
• You don’t have to be Jewish to find favor in G-d’s eyes • G-d gave only seven basic commandments to gentiles • Yiddish words for gentiles are goy, shiksa and …
Goyim – definition of goyim by The Free Dictionary
pl. goy·im or goys Often Offensive A person who is not Jewish. goy?ish adj. n , pl goyim or goys a Jewish word for a gentile ?goyish , ?goyisch adj n …
Who is/are the racist/racists? And what does that mean to Palestinians?
Read what is written in the Talmud about Jesus, Mary and us non-Jews. To summarize, we’re cattle put on earth by God in order to be exploited. White supremacists, as bad as they are, do not have anywhere near the political clout or media leverage as do the Jews and their PC ideologues. I don’t understand why most Jews reject Jesus, their own Messiah, preferring the corruption of Judaism instead.
i have read / reviewed significant portions of it. The so-called leaders of israel who are zionists are embedded in the Talmud because it gives them permission to murder and steal. The reason they dont/wont accept Jesus is because either Jesus really was a gentile or Jesus stands in the way of their greed and evil, or both.
Gladio
The Talmud does NOT give people permission to murder and steal.
Jesus was Jewish; His Mother Mary was a Jew. It’s just that they’ve been given over to disobedience for a time, until the fullness of the Gentiles is complete. That’s not to say that there aren’t Christian Jews or Jews who don’t follow the Talmud’s teachings. We must be cautious not to utilize the tactics of the radical Marxists, i.e. blaming all Jews wholesale for the wrongdoings of those in positions of power.
This is a very complicated situation because there’s also a spiritual component to it.
Jewish is a religion, not a race.
You can be jewish and black.
You can be jewish and gentile/caucasian.
The situation is not complicated at all.
Jewish persons are good people.
Zions on the other hand use jewish persons as human shields and run a game on populations under the color of religion.
Judaism is a religion. There were 12 tribes of Israel. Israel will not allow you to migrate there unless you can prove that you’re Jewish through DNA. They will not allow you in just by claiming that you follow their religion.
However, according to the Word of God, one is not a Jew by circumcision of the flesh but rather by circumcision of the heart (Romans 2:29). If you belong to Christ then you are Abraham’s descendents, heirs according to the promise (Galatians 3:29). We’re now under a New Covenant.
As i have read, the ashkenazis from khazhar are not of the 12 tribes neither sephardics. I read the ashkenazis have contempt for the sephardics and the gentiles as well. My guess is the ashkenazis are trying to cement their claim to judaism by overcompensating with the zionist scheme, as in the, “we’re more jewish than you are” con job. I also read that they had a deal with Adolf and wanted to eliminate the sephardics. The Huffpost “we are masters you are goy” meme should have been jumped on by the media, but no…. they didnt make it an issue nor fire the person that created it or the editor who let it out. Going to have to coin a new word here, JACIST.
“If you tell a lie big enough [Russia] and keep repeating it [Russia], people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” -the progressive left’s Joseph Goebbels, the Socialist Workers Party (National as in NPR)
If you tell a lie big enough [The White Christian Race is under great threat!] and keep repeating it [The Cultural Marxists are out to get us!], people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent[by multiculturalists, feminists, homosexuals, Jews, Roma, black people, immigrants, other non-white Christian minorities, white race traitors, etc.], for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” -the alt-right’s Joseph Goebbels, aka Steve Bannon, Richard Spencer, et al.
Isn’t this fun? You’re a Nazi! No, you’re a Nazi! No, you’re a Stalinist! No, you’re a Stalinist! Pffftttttt….
You started it! No, you started it! . . . It’s like being six years old again. Which is the average level of alt-right emotional maturity. ..
Except you know the deep state said only one of those things.
“If you tell a lie big enough [Russia] and keep repeating it” …says the repetitious liar crapflooding in service of Trump and his reich wing.
does that make Stars a Goy?
and if so, says who?
Over the course of the entire year, the MSM has done nothing but inundate the public with a non-stop barrage of hysteria over Russia, all without presenting one shred of hard evidence. As if the American public is just supposed to take the say-so of these corrupt political figures and their presstitutes. Most of the public aren’t buying it; trust in the government and media is at all-time lows.
You are not credible and are a deliberate liar intending to advance pro Trump, pro Russia narratives.
Other than you replying to me directly here, I ignore your worthless posts.
This site has seen a deterioration and influx of spurious Trump / Russia apologists eager to flood these boards with shit.
fuck off
The truth hurts, doesn’t it?
BTW, I’m not a Trump supporter, as you allege: he’s just as much a part of the establishment as is Hillary. However, your side doesn’t only want to try and replace him with one of your ideologues but also slander everyone who doesn’t cave to your warped Marxist world view as well.
No more easy victories for you.
Is the progressive left and its media going too easy on the Trump administration now? Because that’s exactly what it will deny later.
That’s exactly what it will claim later.
I was going to wait to add to another a part of a comment I posted( too soon )to show up but its taking awhile and the comment count is going all over the place again, so I’m going to go ahead and be done with this an add that I posted what Thomas Frank wrote about Bannon because I never understood what his appeal was about or how he got into the white house
Merging two unconnected halves of populist rage saying the cultural is responsible for the economic explains some of it, although I think Republicans were instrumental in igniting cultural to control the economic but that is another conversation
Now the left wants you to believe its media went easy on Trump’s candidacy and now its presidency.
And still the left thinks it can lead.
These progressive leftist sociopaths have been wrong on everything, wrong at every turn. And yet they still demand to lead.
from Feb 2017
“How Steve Bannon captured America’s spirit of revolt
The president’s aide stole a march on Democrats by shouting about economic injustice. But his solution – a return to pre-1960s social mores – is bizarre
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/10/steve-bannon-spirit-revolt-democrats-gave-up
(cont) [Bannon] “The current economic crisis is not a failure of capitalism, but a failure of culture.”
What culture do you think Bannon means? The buccaneering culture of the Wall Street traders? The corrupt culture of the real estate appraisers or the bond rating agencies? The get-rich-quick culture of the mortgage originators?
No, no and no. He means … the counterculture of the 1960s. Bell bottoms. Drum solos. Dope. That’s the thing to blame for the financial crisis and the bailouts. Not the deregulation of derivatives in 2000. It was those kids having fun at Woodstock in 1969.”
Anyway, I thought it was pretty interesting. I like Thomas Franks.
Fun comparisons:
This is the same media, however, that gave Donald Trump such a boost in the Republican primary because they thought he was a clown act with no hope of winning – amusingly, that’s a strategy that the unpopular Hillary Clinton also embraced because she thought Trump was a candidate who’d be easier to beat than Bush or Rubio:
We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates [Trump/Cruz/Carson] so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to [take] them seriously.”
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2016-donald-trump-214428
Kudos..RIP..”Love Trumps Hate”
smart like a fox?
maybe DT freed him from the deep state dragnet.
Oh yes, the media gave Trump a real “boost” all right, beginning the very following day of his 2015 announcement:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/new-york-daily-news-front-pages-presidential-election-gallery-1.2512941?pmSlide=1.2474203
So you tell ’em photosymbiosis. And help us out: point to where you think the press did Trump any favors.
So now you’re trying to associate Bannon’s antagonism against a biased media with an agenda with the socialists of Germany who railed against the Jewish owners of their media? That’s rich. Classic Alinsky tactic.
Double-irony: socialism is leftist all the way (e.g. Bernie Sanders) and Jews really do own practically every major media outlet. Actually, make that triple-irony – likening Bannon to the Nazis while he’s an avowed Zionist!
Don’t you mean “Classic Emmanual Goldstein tactic”?
Doubleplus ungood thoughtcrime detected! Off to the joycamp with you, unperson!
Hillary lost:
“Today our country has lost a true American original, my friend and mentor Robert C. Byrd.”
– Crooked Hillary on KKK Grand Wizard, Senator (D) – West Virginia
“Mayor of Charlottesville demands removal of ‘lightning rod’ statue of General Robert E. Lee after deadly protest – but the state’s Democrat Governor DENIES the request as legal battle continues”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4804054/Charlottesville-Mayor-says-swift-removal-Gen-Lee-statue.html
democratic party elites = closet racists
IT IS POSSIBLE for Trump to turn this around. Who knew ?
Byrd later called joining the KKK “the greatest mistake I ever made.”
What did Trump ever do?
I seriously doubt if he has influenced the place. His role as media propagandist will be of more practical concern. Flogging a dead horse just to attack Trump. No need to.
As an Englishman from a non-English background I find it strange that you focus on old-school, tired and anachronistic racism rather than the colour-blind American Exceptionalism and elitism that prevails in our world right now.
These people hate everyone, even their own blood they feel does not represent them or their ideals. They respect ruthless power and extreme wealth and the ability to cause pain and trouble and death to their adversaries, and that’s it.
Black, White, Jew, Arab, Chinese and any mixture thereof – if you are in the circle you are in the game and you speak their language and you get accepted; if you are not, then you might be able to trace your bloodline back to Hengst and Horsa but these guys won’t care. All this Racism this, Islamo-Russo-Perseo-Koreophobia that they spout is just more bullsh!t for the rest of us to wade through, more brambles on the path to ridding the world of these disgusting thieves, our self-appointed rulers and keepers and entrepreneurial geniuses that we so dimly shine in their radiance and so weakly compare to that we must be exploited at every chance so that they may dazzle all with their brightness.
But when some of them pay your wages and sign off on your mouthpiece, I guess you pull your punches.
the DEEP STATE has succeeded in stripping President Trump of the ANTI-DEEP-STATE personnel.
Whether PT did this willingly, unwillingly, as planned, opportunistically, whatever, does not matter.
What does matter is what happened next – the revealing of the glee of the deep state presence..
GOY, BYE
The ones who want to lead Americans by the nose.
? Did the deep state play rope-a-dope on PT? Or, did they play ROPE-A-GOY?
We were a very special asset force of nature and the United States of America underwater the world over.
“Hudson! This little girl survived longer than that with no weapons and no training.”
The confederate flag and its monuments will never be forgotten, they will be taken down for all the right reasons, eventually it will be put behind us as a lesson to learn from and grow. It represents different things to different people, the flag can not escape its truth, it is a symbol of “White” tyranny and Christian fascism, it us they American racists rally flag, a symbol of hate used against the people whom (all most everyone other than themselves) they don’t like. It must be nerve wracking to swim in identity race politics with the confederate flag wrapped around your head. I live in and on treaty territory. I notice we all breath the same air and drink the same contaminated water, drive the same crappy roads, live next door to one and other, say hello to one and other, yes, a few folks are iceholes who live in the community, but we all see that iceholes come in all colors, mostly people decent people, everyone tries to get along, so they do, and most of all WE do get along, its not a difficult thing. The community is big and is diverse, and has typical social problems. All that aside, some of us are still trying to understand the history of the Scalp Proclamations, the abuse at government schools, forced migrations, and how those who paid an extra bounty for a child’s scalp could justify their existence, some of us know and accept the facts, it is called genocide. Today, the genocide is still perpetrated by U.S. and Canadian governments by not allowing the Indigenous full self governance, allowing for the waters and a scared lands (protected under treaty) to be desecrated by greed. Many hundreds of Indigenous communities across the continent have contaminated drinking water. So, I suggest its time to say good bye to the confederate flag and its monuments to criminals, we will never forget what you represent and you will never rise again. In the name of peace and reconciliation, to all those who want hang on to the flag by a loose thread, please just face it, the confederate flag represents white supremacy, it is a the symbol of hate. Try peace, understanding and maybe we can come to the realization that its time we all get along and a reconciliation can start by a repudiation of fascism and the militant American fascists.
Your calls for “peace” and “understanding” are in diametric opposition with the actions of leftist groups, tearing down and vandalizing statues, then hysterically slandering all white nationalists and free speech advocates on the right as racists. The sad thing is, you probably believe your own hubris.
Five Flags?
http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2017/08/18/six-flags-over-texas-removes-confederate-flag-reversing-earlier-decision.html
This means Texas never existed under a Confederate flag as far as the park can tell. How cool is that?
That’s weird I started my period preadolescence in a bathroom in Astroworld Houston. Thought I was going to pass the freak out, it was so sticky and muggy and humid.
That’s great. That is cool.
The name “Six Flags” refers to the flags of the six different nations that have governed Texas: Spain, France, Mexico, the Republic of Texas, the United States, and the Confederate States of America..
Up the highway a piece in Vallejo, Ca., is Six Flags Discovery Kingdom, affiliated with the corp, but has a separate logo..
However, elsewhere in central California, in the town of Salinas, the area known as “Confederate Corners” has attracted attention in the past week..
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/08/18/amid-trump-remarks-mixed-emotions-surface-at-confederate-corners/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederate_Corners,_California?wprov=sfti1
So now , are we entering another genre of identity politics, ? From flags, to monuments, to geographical place names?
Ft. Bragg in CA. which is named for Braxton Bragg, another Confederate General, is also getting attention..
Heck, brings back memories when all those countries in Africa changed names and then when the USSR and Yugoslavia broke up, all those new names of countries ..
“To lose one parent, Mr Worthing, may be regarded as a misfortune to lose both looks like carelessness.” — Oscar Wilde, The Importance of Being Earnest, Act I, part 2
The DNC isn’t gone, and their bigotry is everywhere:
“The only reason you are endorsing him is because he’s black. Let’s just be clear.”
– Bill Clinton
“I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.I mean, that’s a storybook, man.”
– Crazy Uncle Joe Biden
“This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.”
– Brad Marshall, DNC staffer plotting against Bernie
“You cannot go to a 7/11 or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I’m not joking.”
— Crazy Uncle Joe Biden
“Colored People’s Time”
– Crooked Hillary and De Blazio skit
As we all know, Obama also armed Nazi groups in the Ukraine, rendering naked the cognitive dissonance of snowflakes, as they now rant about Nazis:
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/06/12/u-s-house-admits-nazi-role-in-ukraine/
Obama then put Joe Biden’s sleazy son, Hunter, on the board of the largest gas company there:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/05/14/hunter-bidens-new-job-at-a-ukrainian-gas-company-is-a-problem-for-u-s-soft-power/
Moral of the story: Liberals don’t care about Nazism. Their president armed them to overthrow the Ukraine two months before an election. These groups Obama used in the coup were also waving confederate flags, thus exposing the rank hypocrisy of liberals and their indifference to confederate flags.
Hey, hey, ho, ho, nationalist NSF has got to go.
Does the Museum of Hate take wrist chips?
I dunno, but if this statue/tech/ censorship fad takes hold, “eventbrite” -type apps , and “meet ups”may curtail access opportunities..ridiculous thought..but the way things are goin..
globalism requires that true socio-political ethnic identity be recast as a deliciously flavored neoliberal/neoconservative cultural smoothie
so expect the deep state and their media to stay on-point until trump is replaced
unless PT, surrounded, used Americans as a springboard in which case everything just goes to ashez.
Liberals have a problem they would hate to admit. They, who profess the ultimate stomach for accepting differences and diversity, are stopped dead in their bigoted tracks when it comes to treating those who have a different ideologue, yet they have more in common with ISIS than Republicans. Scary.
ICYMI..
I highly recommend TRNN’s updated doc.
The Real Story of How Bannon and Trump Got to The White House;
“Steve Bannon was fired from the White House on Friday, August 18th, 2017, but most of the media is missing the story of Robert Mercer, the billionaire that brought Bannon to the White House, who has now reappointed him as Chairman of Breitbart News”
http://therealnews.com/t2/story:19811:The-Real-Story-of-How-Bannon-and-Trump-Got-to-The-White-House
and yesterday’s discussion w/Paul Jay & Max B.
http://therealnews.com/t2/story:19809:Max-Blumenthal-and-Paul-Jay-on-firing-of-Steve-Bannon
Who are these so-called Confederate generals? If they existed, why are there no traces of their legacy?
Yes..well, in the past two days, 4 members of congress from the bay area (all women, all democrats), have entered bills and resolutions calling for the empowerment of the 25th Amendment . Their she’s run from 84 to 67yo,,
Look at the positive possibilities, another resolution, bill and/or amendment calling for an old-age limit
In my mind, Trump will be gone soon, within a few months. We are left with Pence, a Christian religious end timer (his visions of Christ is my visions enemy), and a the Generals. Can we just admit the Republic is over and divorce our government? We could rediscover Athenian democracy, fire all the representatives (say good by to the political class) and govern by plebiscite and direct democracy with protections for minority rights and civil law. We need to improve democracy, the political class has killed democracy, we deserve better.
Direct democracy is tyranny of the majority. That’s why the U.S. was founded as a Constitutional republic, and not a democracy. Direct democracies don’t empower dissidents.
You want a direct democracy, go finger twinkle in Zuccatti Park, or in the DPRK.
It must be too much to consider, a kinds of dissonance that can dismiss any notion of improving the U.S. democracy, from true direct/pure democratic solutions as possibilities or blends of representative and direct democracy. It is laughable when you or an Alt-Right supporter wrap yourself in the flag of 1776 and claim infallibility or superiority of political system (a constitutional republic) when the fact is, the U.S. political system is as corrupt as any in the world, a system fully endorsed by the plutocrats, a system of governance that has perpetrated financial crimes against its own citizens, a system of government that tolerates torture, black site prisons, murder, the prison industrial slave labor system, the military industrial complex, a government who’s officials are guilty of war crimes and gun boat diplomacy in every corner of the world with a constitution that is breached by government when ever it feels it necessary. When you wake up from the lies and stop believing the mythology/propaganda of the “American State”, and stop the kind of hypocrisy and ignorance you represent (the Zucatti Park, DPRK comment) or you will find that ignorant attitudes will professed by those who believe in American hubris, the white right (Homo Narcissus Americanus), will sadly lead to more hate and violence. I will proudly finger twinkle in Zucatti park with you any time, however one condition, only when you wake from statist delusions.
You literally just argued for a return to Athenian democracy. How well did that work out??…more importantly, why do you think that is??
is it possible stuff like this got Bannon thrown out?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/7/3/15914750/steve-bannon-trump-tax-rich
Wall Street was not happy with Bannon at all, and now they are celebrating. IMNSHO, if Wall Street ever gets too disenchanted with The Donald, his ass will be grass in short order too.
Bannon distances himself from the far right and ethno-nationalists.
http://prospect.org/article/steve-bannon-unrepentant
He [Steve Bannon] dismissed the far right as irrelevant and sidestepped his own role in cultivating it: “Ethno-nationalism—it’s losers. It’s a fringe element. I think the media plays it up too much, and we gotta help crush it, you know, uh, help crush it more.”
“These guys are a collection of clowns,” he added.
So, the white-nationalists and other clowns have outlasted their usefulness?
and yet he reportedly wants to start a network to the right of Fox News
http://www.businessinsider.com/steve-bannon-network-breitbart-more-conservative-than-fox-news-trump-ailes2017-8
Perhaps Bannon thinks he can appeal to a broader base by denouncing these fringe groups. Bannon can point at his remark to provide cover when he is accused of being far right or extreme right. He can say that he called the far right and white-nationalists “a collection of clowns”.
On the other hand, to the right of Fox is only the far right. So, I am still puzzled by this.
There will always be websites for fringe groups, but it is good news that Bannon is out of the white house.
Yes, Trump is a horrible human being and it is a travesty that he is our President, but he is far from the only poor choice we have had to elect including our Democratic choice to oppose him.
Consider this one for example: Woodrow Wilson whom was an absolute racist that brought back segregation, set up the banking cabal of the Federal Reserve that has made indentured servants of the masses, set up the income tax to pay them off in perpetuity, brought us into WWI to protect the financial interests of the banksters, which may not have been the move to end all wars but the one to set up WWII.
Things have not improved over time and they will only get worse as long as the nation is subject to the abuses that come with corporate personhood and the corrupting influence of money in politics.
It appears Trump knowingly allowed a “Traitor” in the Whitehouse and Bannon has infiltrated the workings of the Office of the Presidency for the “Over throw of the US Government!”
Now THIS IS an IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE! Right?
Uh, it’s White House. If you don’t know that…
Mehdi, your last column was a fluke–commentators converged under it because there was nowhere else to go. Your puff pieces along with Mackey’s are still as boring and repetitive as before.
Hey what about this? Does this stay or go?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_Memorial
There’s a copy in Boston, MA.
Isn’t that the one where Lincoln is getting a shoe shine from a Black man?
The fantastic articles published here get watered down with petty political opinion pieces like this.
I don’t know why The Intercept doesn’t stick with hard news. Political hit jobs like this just limit The Intercepts’ audience and help brand them as another far-left smear machine. It demeans the real work The Intercept does.
Socialist Workers Party (later the World Workers Party (www.workers.org).
Working Families Party.
German Socialist Workers Party (National as in National Teacher Day, National Science Foundation).
Who loves identifying with Workers Party (and Socialist) gatherings but the progressive left?
“Oh no, Obama’s approval is down. Ew, Obama, is really a rightie, that’s what.” -the progressive left (O’s biggest entourage before he was rejected by a disappproving public), reading chapter and verse from the post-Nuremberg playbook
I’ve read at least a gig of spews on this site, many of which lack even a shadow of a coherent thought.
But this post is priceless.
It’s like going to a neighborhood rummage sale to watch someone grab every cheap shiny object they can find, After filling their truckbed with this useless junk, they then drive away with a drooling self-satisfied grin while listening to Rush Limbaugh (speakers cranked, no doubt) on the radio cackle with a falsetto Hillary Clinton voice.
You deserve an Internet Incoherence Award for your post.
As you guzzle warm beers with your trailer park buddies later, you can tell them you won the internet today.
My congratulations.
Even his flesh and pallor looked like a slab of spoiled meat, like a-few-days-old piece of pork butt, reflective of the ugliness, the insidious hate, existing within his frame. Why would anyone think that the worms and flames which consume us at our end is worthy of such a worthless crime against humanity, hate?
Err…cognitive dissonance? Feel any?
Their baaaack!! Lol everyone’s favorite site is back up n running.the lies obfuscation and lefty propaganda have given this site unprecedented global reach lol go lurk in there see for yourself what it’s all about read the articles…don’t worry you won’t turn into a Nazi. … Lol…or will you??? They are laughing to bust a gut…thirty site is dailystormer.lol. yup lol
Dilbert’s Scott Adams Explains “How To Know You’re In A Mass Hysteria Bubble”
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-18/dilberts-scott-adams-explains-how-know-youre-mass-hysteria-bubble
Will the sorry progressive left ever try to read Dilbert anymore?
“The wrong-about-everything crowd decided that the only way their world made sense, with their egos intact, is that either the Russians helped Trump win or there are far more racists in the country than they imagined, and he is their king.”
Hahaha.
Calling Donald Trump “the orange-skinned gorilla in the room” dehumanizes him and amounts to hate speech.
Would the Intercept dare to publish something calling Obama ‘the black-skinned gorilla in the room’?
Why do you really hate Donald Trump so much?
Mehdi loves Racism !
It pains me to defend Trump or anyone in his orbit.
However, articles purporting to give examples showing just how racist Trump or the people around him are inevitably give a couple somewhat convincing examples, and a whole bunch of dubious if not downright dishonest ones.
The most clear case of bigotry from the Bannon camp is his Islamophobia. The trouble is that, by this standard, many establishment Washington figures that are praised by Republicans and Democrats are also anti-Muslim bigots, as are leftist commentators like Bill Maher.
I just don’t know how effective you think this tactic is of denouncing people as racists until they go away. I think it is counter-effective.
There are non-name calling ways of refuting the ideas of the Right.
Here’s something to consider. Steve Bannon was one of the only Trump advisers who was arguing against war with North Korea. His right-wing nationalism, as distasteful as it might be in many ways, had the benefit of leading him to oppose some foolish and unnecessary wars.
Had the Bannon wing of the Trump circle had more influence, we might have avoided a scenario where Seoul or Japan would be attacked by Kim Jong Un, which would lead to untold numbers of deaths.
I don’t know how cheery we should be now that the “bigots” have been rooted out of the White House. Great, now we’ve got a bunch of military generals and neo-cons who want war with North Korea and Russia.
Bannon, for all his faults, doesn’t want those things.
If a few more racists in Washington amounted to avoiding a couple of major wars, I’d take that. It doesn’t mean I agree with their personal prejudices.
Thanks
For me it has always been about war.
I am a liberal but when Hillary repeatedly said she would shoot down Russian planes over Syria the deal was sealed. How anyone could vote for WWIII is beyond me.
The world could take an easy deep breath after WWIII Hillary was defeated, but it was temporary.
So crazed are Democrats that they allied themselves with Neocons to get Trump.
The Democrats, Neocons and MSM have put enormous pressure on the Trump administration (with plenty of help from some Republicans) and now Trump is boxed in.
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2017/08/trump-drops-a-pilot.html#more
“Bannon was also against the imperial projects in Afghanistan, North Korea and elsewhere. Then the empire stroke back at him.
The White House is now under command of military hawks interventionists. A triumvirate of war-losing Generals, Kelly, Mattis and McMaster, is in control of U.S. policy. That policy will likely be similar to the one we expected under a Hillary Clinton administration. The neocons, pushing for a dangerous crisis, are winning and the liberals are loving it.”
Amazing morph in just a few sentences — from self-proclaiming as a liberal to decrying liberals and lumping them with neocons and militarism.
I suspect you don’t know what you believe.
“I suspect you don’t know what you believe.”
I don’t believe liberals want to be warmongers, but liberals voted for Obama and Hillary. Would that include you, oh “confused one”?
I don’t believe liberals would want to support massive secret programs that spy on Americans and treat them as the enemy. Yet liberals voted for Obama – twice! Would that include you, oh “confused one”?
TPP?
Extra-judicial executions of Americans?
Gitmo?
Drone programs?
Support for Wall Street banksters?
Turning our local police departments into paramilitary forces?
If you answered “yes” to you being a liberal *and* you voted for Obama and Hillary, I would say that you are the confused one.
By the way, you cut and paste from an article I referenced. It wasn’t me speaking. However, generally, the quote is correct, “liberals are loving it”.
Specifically, as applies to me, it is not correct, I am not loving it.
Do you?
Answer that. Do you love seeing the Trump administration getting boxed into the neocon war camp?
You can pat yourself on the back, if you are a liberal. Nice going.
A minority of liberals, such as myself, saw the danger.
Obama and Hillary aren’t liberals. Dennis Kucinich and Glenn Greenwald are liberals. Calling Obama and Clinton liberals is like calling McCain and Graham conservatives.
Thank you.
I try to speak for myself rather than letting a label speak for me.
I have voted for decades. I’ve never voted for anyone who represents my views 100%. I once voted for a Republican, then regretted it immediately and ever since. I never voted Republican again. In my opinion, anyone who self-identifies as a Republican disqualifies themselves.
I voted for Obama in 2008, Stein in 2012 and Clinton in 2016.
I live in America which has moved from being a flawed liberal democracy which valued human rights to an emerging fascist State where a mob of privileged white men can arm, organize and march in a parade reminiscent of Nazi Germany in the early 30s.
Whatever else you want to label that group of miscreants and malefactors, I am utterly and unequivocally opposed to every thing they espouse. They are not there because of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, or Anwar Al-Awaki. They are not liberals. And liberals are not loving it.
They are there for Trump — for the suppression of human rights, for the celebration of racist institutions like the Confederacy, and for the sheer joy bullying and violence brings them.
Therefore I conclude that anyone who makes common cause with Trump, Bannon, or anyone else not expressly and existentially opposed this fascist movement, (whatever they call themselves today) opposes me and my values.
One of the reasons they think they have a cause is that people who know better — who should know better, who claim to know better — refuse to denounce them in no uncertain terms.
I apologize for mistaking a quote from a blog of sympathizers as a statement of your personal belief. Apparently, according to you, my mistake wasn’t a mistake at all.
One of the mainstay strategies of this profoundly evil movement is their misuse of labels. This misuse — this intentional abuse — is designed to demonize — and in fact expressly demonizes — anyone not accepting their agenda in full. It is a rhetorical technique used by many at this site. Your hysterical response is typical of this tendency.
You might as well scream, “Godless liberals love killing Christian babies. That is why they support abortion.” This is the sort of rhetoric they use to hide in plain sight — or maybe I should say, to make a virtue of evil.
Whatever else the right may espouse, liberals have nothing to do with this clusterfucked movement now led by Trump and Bannon.
That’s a ridiculous statement. People are often the most critical of the political group they identify with and rightly so. Anti-war liberals see mainstream liberalism as not genuine liberalism but a perversion of it. Hence the common label of corporate democrats as “neo-liberals”.
I’m a libertarian but I have a rooting interest in seeing anti-war liberalism become more prominent. It is not us who are lumping in mainstream liberals with neocons and militarism. They’ve done this themselves, openly and unashamedly.
You use a label to describe something that you think you believe to show an affinity for something you think you prefer while distinguishing something from something else that you don’t like so you can conclude that the something you don’t like is actually associated with that which you don’t like and shouldn’t be mistaken as something you do like.
Does that sentence I just wrote make sense to you?
No?
Try specifics. Use definitions. Offer examples. Say what you mean. Consider your audience. Be clear. Cite when possible. Avoid labels. Don’t generalize. Illustrate. Develop. Clarify.
For instance, you offer “neo-liberal” as an opposition to “anti-war liberal”. What the hell does that mean? I’ve never heard of a pro war liberal, I don’t have any idea what connects neo-liberals with anti-war liberals and I don’t know how corporate democrats (whatever that means) get thrown into your basket of unmeaning gobbledegook.
Why don’t you start with a definition of “neoliberal.”
Here’s the neoliberal wikipedia page to help you get started:
I don’t like the term “neo-liberal” and I don’t generally use it. As the Wikipedia entry showed, my libertarian philosophy could be called “neo-liberal”. I mentioned it merely because this term is used by Progressives who try to draw distinctions between themselves and mainstream Democrats.
It seems like you’re playing semantic games instead of recognizing what Levi Tate clearly meant.
The issue of war and peace is the most important of all political issues to me as a libertarian. Some liberals and progressives agree. Therefore, it is reasonable to be just as concerned with the Deep State coup taking place, if not more so, than we are about some arguably racist right wing nationalists. Particularly if those right wing nationalists are less hawkish than the Deep State and the mainstream Democratic Party.
Mass murder is worse than racism, though astoundingly many on the Left seem to disagree.
Words mean.
If you use words indiscriminately — if you attempt to obscure or deceive through the use of vague or overly general terms — then virtually anything can be “truthfully” asserted.
At the very best, the misuse of words indicate a sloppy thought process.
As this era becomes increasingly corrupt, I see this lack of precision — this lack of meaning — substituting for actual thought. People can get away with, for instance, unfairly lumping Hillary Clinton together with the neocon arguments of war in Iraq when — far from her vote in 2002 — as Secretary of State she pushed back against the neoconservatives who clamored for war with Iran over nukes or when she resisted an Iraq-style invasion of Syria over Assad and terrorism. Meanwhile Julian Assange calls her responsible for the European refugees from Syria because she pushed NATO into defending Libyan civilians from the atrocities the Ghadaffi regime inflicted as reprisals for their success during the First Libyan Civil War.
Donald Trump is president because people accept nonsense as truth, lies as gospel, and slander as smart politics.
If you or Tate think the battle is about ideology, then you’ve accepted “conventional wisdom” as accurate when it is actually a greater deception than any conspiracy a modern conspiracist can imagine. You don’t need God, aliens, or a political Succubus (Clinton) to explain what is in plain sight.
For instance, consider the stolen emails the Russians delivered to Wikileaks for publication.
1. There was no criminal act at all revealed by those emails. Comey said so when he both cleared and slandered Clinton. Yet Trump continued to call her “crooked” Hillary.
2. The invention of an internal Democratic cabal betraying their party and subverting the Clinton campaign — which supposedly leads to the murder of a staffer — emerges fully formed from the chaos of sloppy thoughts (displayed in sloppy usage such as neoliberal or liberal.)
3. People continue to insist the Trump campaign didn’t collude with Russia despite little Trump announcing it!
Think about that. Not only did Trump say, “we colluded” when he writes “I’m loving it” the bullshit deepens as they try to make the case that a meeting with Russian cutouts became a meaningless discussion about adoption (a cover story apparently invented by Putin for Trump to disseminate) rather than the delivery of anti-Clinton materials which Trump immediately claimed would be soon made available to the public.
I find it astonishing that instead of analyzing what’s in the public domain, writers here — Greenwald especially — must invent a universe of sinister behaviors when the simple truth is most compelling.
Some would say these invention are lies. Some might say the propagators of these inventions are simply stupid. Some might point to the press and say they media gives deceptive information. Some even insist — as you insist simply by using the term unskeptically — that the Deep State is responsible for electing Donald Trump AND that the Deep State is attempting to undermine Trump for ideological reasons.
As many posts here show, the intellectual contortions people must go through to maintain their false narratives — even to the point of inventing a cabal of anti-Clinton insiders sabotaging her campaign for which one of them is murdered … It just boggles me.
So I ask why this is so.
Fools? Liars? Paid operatives? Ideological zealots? Russian trolls? Too much Fox?
None of these in my opinion.
It is simply because of sloppy thinking reified by sloppy use of language — which leads to more sloppy thinking which leads to more sloppy usage.
And so on.
I just returned to this thread.
Holy Smokes you are a troll!
At first you used diversionary tactics, your focus on semantics.
Then you dropped a bomb of views that no one could hold.
…Iraq/Syria/Libya/Comey/Russia/Wikileaks…
I will not believe that you are that lost. If you are, then G-d help you.
You, troll, want to send this comments section spinning off into endless,
fruitless debate.
You did succeed in making me angry though, troll. Perhaps that makes your day. Especially the part where you defended Clinton on Libya!
“she pushed NATO into defending Libyan civilians from the atrocities
the Ghadaffi regime”
Wow!
The US did not attack Libya for humanitarian reasons, you obscenity!!
You horrid, amoral, obscenity !!
Even to *pretend*, troll, that you believe that is just too much!
You should educate yourself, imbecile.
Since I doubt you’d even click a link, here is the Wikipedia page “2011 military intervention in Libya.”
I assume that you can read. I assume you can comprehend what you read. I wonder if you will read.
If you can’t even get your facts straight, how can you manage to spew your half-baked ideology in which you cannot even accurately define “liberal”?
You claim to be angry with me for pointing out facts in the public domain.
You should be angry with yourself for your lazy and unskeptical acceptance of Republican talking points.
You swim in lies, drown in lies, and then complain when you’re warned that those lies are dangerous waters.
Educate yourself or shut the fuck up.
Be gone, troll.
Today is the first day you ever heard of a pretext?
No one, not even yourself, believes you were born yesterday.
I’m with milton: educate yourself.
AND
stfu
So the UN, the ICC, HRW and various international media conspired to topple Gadaffi on the pretext of documented atrocities committed against Libyan civilians during the First Libyan Civil war in 2011?????
Here’s the UN:
Here’s the ICC charges filed:
Here’s Al-Jazeera reporting on the defection of Libyan military officers:
Here’s Wikipedia:
Here’s the Telegraph reporting on Physicians for Human Rights.
[each of these links can be googled by cutting and pasting]
There is absolutely no doubt that the international intervention intended to prevent civilian atrocities. It was not a pretext. It was an attempt to mitigate the death and suffering being inflicted on Libyan civilians. And, perhaps, in self interest so that they weren’t flooded with refugees.
However — and this relates directly to Syria — international forces were used by combatants to support their military tactics. This led to many, many civilian deaths. This intervention demonstrated the futility — making matters worse — of intervening in a civil war. This is why international nations have so far refused to intervene and, instead, tolerate the European refugee crisis as the lesser of two horrid evils.
Domestically political demagogues like Trump and Fox exploit the ongoing atrocities with incendiary — and yet meaningless — rhetoric. The whole point of Trump bombing an airport and doing no damage was to promote political talking points — to appear “strong” without actaully risking anything and to continue to bellyache about the ineffectiveness Clinton and Obama. What has changed in Syria since Trump took office?
Nothing.
Nothing except the strengthening of Russia and Iran as Assad allies.
So join Trump, Alex Jones, Russian catspaw Julian Assange, Vladmir Putin, Fox News and the rest of the anti-liberal crew not only exploiting the suffering around the world, but actually perpetuating it.
Your ignorant and counterfactual conspiracy theorizing only helps exactly those you speciously claim to oppose.
well said.
The foreign policy criminals of the deep state cannot continue their game of world domination unless they have a reason to oppose those they want to dominate, and rule and profit by. Since the deep state is not really a builder and contributor to a good society, they have to be fed and make their money the other way and like any typical extortion racket, they insist “pay us or else”.
As you say, Great, now we’ve got a bunch of military generals and neo-cons who want war with North Korea and Russia.., their unwillingness to leave others alone who are not paying them needs support thru villification – and that can be nationalistic “damn ruskies” or racist “damn gooks” or wallstreetish “damn commies”.
Again Medhi Hasan, whether you were born here or not, you’ve fallen hook line and sinker for identity politics bullshit, but we won’t let you propagate that narrative here. Bannon was against interventionist wars in the countries of your ancestors. The people who you align yourself with on the left will bomb the countries of your ancestors until all that is left is the oil they wish to extract from the ground. What name will you call them? Will it fit your race baiting narrative?
Trump goes through staff like pack of chewing-gum…
If he goes the Full Monty that will be quite pile.
Steve Bannon will be more useful to Trump outside the White House. He can still continue to advise Trump without being constrained as he was within the White House.
He can also now defend Trump more publicly, mobilize public opinion, and defend Trump from attacks. Plus he will now be free to criticize the Trump Presidency where the Trump campaign agenda is diluted or abandoned.
Bannon will continue to play a role.
he’ll be useful to Trump as long as Trump follows what he tells him to do. He’s going to be his enemy if he does not
And if Bannon tries to control Trump or criticize him, he’s not going to have an ally.
see http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/18/steve-bannon-fired-whats-next-241793
on more speculation on Bannon outside the White House.
I think this article misdescribes the reason for Bannon leaving. Bannon’s remark about Korea where he mentioned Seoul casualties made it untenable for Trump to retain him. The truth is not always palatable. Bannon’s remark though true was not something that could ever be the official position of the US Govt and therefore a WH official who said it could not be retained. Trump had no choice.
For the merits of Bannon see this surprising NYT article which describes Bannon as dovish. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/us/politics/steve-bannon-nationalism-trump.html?mcubz=3
On the examples listed in the article on Bannon’s racism etc, readers should actually click on the links and see for themselves if the article is accurate. Similar descriptions with links on Trump’s alleged “racism” by the same author were not.
On Islam, I am not anti-Muslim, but don’t you think that Islam does need reform. It is the only religion that takes millennia old diktats literally, where people especially women are urged to adopt practices that might have been acceptable in the Prophet’s time but have no place in this century.
All religions need to reform. Radical Islam not only refuses to reform but is becoming more regressive and literal.
So turns out Bannon was not worth all the millions of words fearfully predicting what he’d get Trump to do. Nor the time lost reading them.
It’s funny how you people have zero idea how to use “bigotry” within context.
Leave the words ‘white nationalism’ to mainstream media and call it like it is … white supremacy … it’s similar to using the term ‘regime change’ when really it’s about overthrowing a government
I’m going to say the purge has begun.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AqJMVSnwg_Y
The next thing we need to do is to get Trump hooked on a different tv show I heard Extreme Amerintergalactic Family Feud will be coming out this fall. 24/7 they may even be looking for a host
thats right youtube links dont work exactly. oh just never mind!
and this will probably shuffled off into some future score card lashings database for those who “ridicule”the white emperor and the other guy, Republicans, whatever.
Great look at Bannon’s banning.
The orange skinned gorilla stuff is beneath you. I understand how angry you may have a right to be, but it just gives everyone an excuse to point out that internal audits need to be done, when calling out the “other” menace.
This article is an example of how liberal hyperbole is so similar
to what they pretend to be opposing.
One example is most telling –
“Trump’s shock victory over Hillary Clinton.”
There was absolutely nothing shocking about his winning. It was a
most mundane example of how willfully ignorant the vast majority of
identity-voting, delusional, people are in the faking U$A.
Trump and Clinton are two versions of the exact same underlying
corruption and
NEITHER of them deserved a single vote.
What would be a “shock” would be if the vast majority of the knee-jerk
comatose “exceptional” citizens actually woke up and told the
corporate robots like Trump and Clinton to get the hell out of the way.
Of course, Sanders made sure something like that would be deflected.
Sure, Bannon is repugnant, but beneath his blatant bigotry lies the
fact that he is serving the same corporate owned agenda as are both
the democrats and republicans.
When you write articles ridiculing Trump’s arrogance and vanity,
you had better look in the mirror because you are not really
that much different.
If they look in the mirror they’ll have to give up the smug sense of superiority, noting that corporatism, militarism, imperialism and oppressive policing gets increasingly entrenched with each administration regardless of whether the government is predominantly Democrat or GOP.
Smug superiority is all the “left” and “right” live for! Neither will let it go, even while the duopoly’s corruption (evidently a united force at the higher levels of the corporate/media/military U.S.) stinks up the whole place. I reckon most Americans think ‘critical thinking’ is the right to be critical!
Trump is so useful to the duopoly, because he continues the system’s ongoing corruption but gladly and with absurd pride takes the blame for it, allowing the Democrats (and in fact much of the Republican establishment) to pretend to be comparatively ‘good,’ which is an outrageous development truly worthy of the epithet “shocking.”
You want to wake people up, which is admirable, but I’ve found lately that they appear to actually want to stay asleep and merely dream of being correct.
I KNOW that my efforts are foolish and that what you say is true,
but my foolish knowledge may be proven wrong. I have no faith,
no hope, they are both useless in the face of human desperation
and delusions,
but equal justice and the amazing wonders of oxygen and clean water
are very very very appealing to me.
I guess I’m doing these things because of my love of plants. The integrity
of trees will not let me give up.
Do not fret ,Steven Bannon will be just fine back at Breitbart. But what really concerns me, is Benghazi and emails. Because, Donald trump did not destroy anything, I think he is a businessman , and only he, knows how to lead our country. Only Donald knows how not to do Benghazi or emails. I love our Dear Leader.
The ACLU has decided to temper its “We’ll defend the right of supremacists to rally” with some common sense.
This demonstrates how political pressure can force them to change their principles. If people want to protect liberty, they’ll need to start another group, outside the purview of PC “tolerance,” that won’t cave under any circumstances.
I’m sorry to hear that Mr. Bannon will be separated from his bigotry. Hopefully they can reconcile and get back together again. I can understand, however, that his bigotry was in love with the term ‘White House’ and didn’t want to leave.
:)
Had to explain to her why I was laughing out loud.
Bannon was prepping for war. He abandoned his post at the White House and swiftly translocated right to the North Korean border. By Trump’s orders he shrunk himself to the size of a rice seed, so he could get into the Kim Jong-Un’s meal and assassinate the millennial leader. But Kim, through thoughtful practice of Juche, was able to spot Bannon crouching in his plate. A chicken was brought in and Bannon was fed to it.
He got left in a field all alone, after the said chicken pooped him out. There he stood, staring into the night sky, as hundreds of thousands of missiles were making their way up, coloring it with all the simple magnificence of their fluorescent trails…
Even though Bannon’s out of the White House, they’ll keep giving him and Trump endless coverage of their racist garbage. Bannon’s firing was announced this morning. Since then, have you literally seen ANYTHING ELSE on corporate media? No you haven’t. They’ll endlessly hype racism, but never to actually try and solve the problem. Instead, all that matters is ratings, selling copies and getting site clicks and views.
Trump criticized both sides in Charlottesville, yet somehow the MSM echo chamber interprets this to mean he’s supporting neo-Nazis. I understand if some people don’t like the guy, but jeez, at least have the integrity to argue against things with fact-based substance. If anything the real racism is completely against white people in the media.
Seemingly every other “news” piece these days is demonizing this or that white person, portraying them as Nazis and anti-Semites. What is the difference between white people referring to themselves as the “master race” and the Jews referring to themselves as the “chosen people,” aside from the fact that the latter owns practically all of the mainstream media outlets and therefore can control the narrative? You tell me.
Something about scripted and whiny together. the cringing chills! Reminds me of a store I occasionally go to that is always playing the most whiny music. I cant get out of there fast enough. I always end up getting on my own case for returning. I know better than this.
I should give an example of what it is but I”ve blocked it out, its a survival musical happiness mechanism kind of thing. The problem is I think thats what causes me to make the mistake of returning when I happen to be in that neighborhood. I just forget
Is this a cry for help?
I’ve thought about contacting the manager about their music selection but its occurred to me that some people don’t mind it and might even like it.
so anyway its just the least confrontational way I could think of saying your whiny scripted race posts were getting on my nerves, but also maybe more about how my attempts at engaging them were regrettable. I should know better
It is inescapable to consider all forms of genocide/extermination [even clandestinely/covertly] against/of humans being/ people/homosepiens not worst than xeno-____ even any culture that covertly consider any non-Jew worst than animals/dogs/beasts, that the christians are to be killed as an acceptable sacrifice to the Talmudic g-god and as this is instill in their Jewish-culture and their kids is equally if not worst worst than white supremacists ideology, kosher-hitlerianism, kosher bolschevism, Arianism, nazism that unequivocally is the epitome of [wickedness] morally repugnant.
I doubt Ivanka and Puppet trump knows of the following as it applies to any non-Jew regardless of conversion:::Hence it is to be inferred that Christian marriage is not true marriage. In Kidduschim (68a), it says: “…How do we know this? Rabbi Huna says: You can read: Remain here with the ass, that is, with a people like an ass. Hence it appears that they are not capable of contracting marriage.” And in Eben Haezer (44, 8): “If a Jew enters into marriage with an Akum (Christian), or with his servant, the marriage is null. For they are not capable of entering into matrimony. Likewise if an Akum or a servant enter into matrimony with a Jew, the marriage is null.”
The white supremacist as well as the Jewry live in our midst. The latter, live according to an unchanging “moral code ” (in appearances and name only) by which the religious and social life of Jewry has been regulated and is binding to this day.
Please do your own research and you will undoubtedly find that in the fist ORIGINAL Talmudic writings that non-Jews DIFFER ONLY IN FORM FROM BEASTS In Midrasch Talpioth of the original Talmud writings (fol. 225d) it says: “God created them(non-Jews) in the form of men for the glory of Israel. But Akum(derogatory term for any non-Jew) were created for the sole end of ministering unto them [the Jews] day and night. Nor can they(non-Jews) ever be relieved from this service. It is becoming to the son of a king [an Israelite] that animals in their natural form, and animals in the form of human beings should minister unto him.” We can quote here also what is said in Orach Chaiim, 57, 6a: “If pigs are to be pitied when they suffer from disease, because their intestines are similar to ours, how much more should the Akum be pitied when thus affected.”(49)
Among many other things while the jew-owned media chants the hyporcrisy of Jewish morality that is worst than bankrupt to their six hundred and sixty six winds::::;:
The ORIGINAL AND FIRST WRITINGS of the Talmud depict that CHRISTIANS ARE TO BE EXTERMINATED 1. Christians to be Harmed Indirectly 1. By not helping them 2. By interfering in their work 3. By deceit in legal matters 4. By harming them in things necessary for life Art. 2. Christians to be Harmed Directly. In Zohar, II, (64b) it says: “…Non-Jews who worship idols(Jesus Christ is an idol according to The talmud), and who are called cow and ass, as it is written: I have a cow and an ass…”
In the Sanhedrin in the Talmud (74b) Tosephoth, it says: “The sexual intercourse of a Goi is like to that of a beast.” And in Kethuboth (3b) it says: “The seed of a Goi is worth the same as that of a beast.”
Now this one is very interesting to say the least considering the propaganda appearances in the entire political field, Jew-owned media and judiciary system. Why?
Don’t be surprise is you realize subversion is the modus operandi for this and athe brief/few few examples quoted above. Choschen Hammischpat (26,1) it says: “A Jew is not permitted to bring his case before Akum judges [akum is referring to Christian or non-Jews), even if the matter is judged by the decisions of Jewish law, and even if both parties agree to abide by such decisions. He who does so is impious and similar to one who calumniates and blasphemes, and who raises his hand against the Law given us by Moses, our great law-giver. Hagah says ‘The Bethin has the power to excommunicate such a one until he release his Jewish brother from the hands of the Gentile
The exact current account of the Jewry’s culture, upbringing, traditions is contained in the FIRST ORIGINAL writings of the Talmud. the word Talmud (which makes so great worthless Noise in the World) it may suffice to observe, that by a sort of Metonymy, it signifies the Book containing the main Doctrines of the Jews…For it is very observable, that the Talmud is oftener brought in/peddled as Vindication of their religion, than Moses, the Prophets, and Holy Writings: insomuch that Jews make the talmud(That YaHushua Ha Massiah condemned as the tradition of men) and not the Old Testament Bible (also known as Pentateuch or Torah), the capstone of their kosher doctrine, and that into which they resolve the decision of all their cases…the Talmud of Babylon…this later had obtain’ef public honor and belief among them: and at this day is universally received as the authentic body of their Law. Customs upbringing and is binding
But don’t believe me do your own research about the worst than covert antigoyimitic/anti-nonjew bigotry and hate instill by the original writings of the Jewish Talmud which is binding on all observing Jewry which is the epitome of morally repugnant wickedness.
https://youtu.be/styLx-iWwC8
You can always count on The Intercept to bring out the anti-Semite bigots
You do realize that to an outsider, the various divisions of the Abrahamic religious tradition – the monotheistic patriarchal Middle East-origin set which includes Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – are all basically indistiguishable from each other? Like the difference between Shia Muslim and Sunni Muslim or Methodist, Lutheran, Baptist, Catholic, or Russian Orthodox Christian, orthodox Jewish, etc. etc. – religious wankerism.
How did satirist Jonathan Swift describe it? The war between those who crack their boiled eggs on the little end vs. the big end?
Whereupon the emperor his father published an edict, commanding all his subjects, upon great penalties, to break the smaller end of their eggs. The people so highly resented this law, that our histories tell us, there have been six rebellions raised on that account; wherein one emperor lost his life, and another his crown. These civil commotions were constantly fomented by the monarchs of Blefuscu; and when they were quelled, the exiles always fled for refuge to that empire. It is computed that eleven thousand persons have at several times suffered death, rather than submit to break their eggs at the smaller end.
Spectacular. And yet… completely bonkers. You are capable of such complex research, thought and writing, yet you pour energy into something non-sensical, unprovable, and ultimately useless to you or anyone else. Ask yourself, honestly, “Are all Jews alike? Are all Christians?” If the answer is yes, then there is no hope for you. If it is no, then please redirect that brain power toward something useful. We could use the help these days.
I don’t know even one Jew who believes that any non-Jew worst than animals/dogs/beasts, that the christians are to be killed as an acceptable sacrifice to the Talmudic g-god
Do you?
I don’t know even one Jew who believes that non-Jews were created for the sole end of ministering unto them [the Jews] day and night.
Do you?
You might try calling white ‘nationalism’ by its correct … white supremacy.
Thank you
I think it’s “white Christian insecurity”. In contrast, to say, Zionism, aka “white Jewish paranoia”. In broader terms, it’s the unfortunate tendency of fearful ignorant human beings to surround themselves with people who look, think, smell etc. like they do. Tribalism, in-group/out-group mentality, etc. Not limited to white people, either; Zimbabwe’s dictator Robert Mugabe once said “I don’t want to see a white face”. Similar tensions often exist between Chinese and Japanese, Puerto Ricans and Mexicans, newly-arrived immigrants and second-generation immigrants, etc. etc.
And of course, sleazy politicians of all stripes try to exploit these tensions for their own benefit.
Hey KH, you fool
Racism , you are a moron
Now, now – Trump is the ideal face of the American ruling class, because he’s an honest representation of that class – arrogant, yet ignorant; inherited wealth; bigoted attitudes reinforced by membership in a class that is 96% white and only associates with its own members at luxury resorts, gated communities – as in Mar-A-Lago – and, at the end of the day, could care less about the standard of living of the average American citizen.
Usually they hire some PR monkeys to clean up their image, a trend initiated with Ivy Lee and John D. Rockefeller, but it’s a bit late for Trump to take that route – what’s he going to do, start singing church hymns on the White House lawn?
It’s also interesting to look at Gary Cohn, who is now top dog in the Trump domestic circus (we already know that ExxonMobil is running foreign policy via Rex Tillerson, and the Pentagon is doing whatever it wants, apparently.)
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/18/steve-bannon-ousted-in-win-for-wall-street-and-cohn-commentary.html
I wonder how many alt-right Trump supporters are having apoplectic fits over Bannon’s exodus and the rise of a Goldman Sachs insider (Hillary Clinton speaking fees!) to top dog. Absolutely hilarious. Supporting the working man! Making Wall Street Even Greater! Print that on your hat, chumps. For more fun, enter this into the Google search box:
Gary Cohn should have gone to prison for his role in the 2008 economic collapse
Anybody want to take bets on which head will roll next? There must be some online betting forum for this. How about McMaster? He’s as much of a creep as Bannon, and a nice tit-for-tat round of firings seems to be the Trump style.
Meanwhile the corporate Democrats are trying to find a Hillary Clinton clone to promote. . . Wow. Well, now that Trump popularity ratings (35%) have finally fallen below Clinton popularity ratings (39%), what could go wrong?
Bannon and Trump (officially) parting ways is just Bannon and Trump agreeing that “Trump’s got this” because he’s firmed up his support of the Neo-Nazis. The executive branch is filled with white supremacists, war hawks, and useless but loyal idiots. Bannon is returning to Breitbart to start phase 2 of their plan by leading the media counter-narratives and to continue eviscerating the executive branch from the outside, further seeding the distracting chaos. Be ready for some event which will mobilize the alt-right and Trump’s friends (such as Erik Prince) to increase societal militarization and possibly lead to violent civil conflict. I’m afraid that this is just the beginning of the next phase.
Agreed. Trump probably has Bannon on speed-dial and they’ll be in constant touch. Bannon is correct on one thing: If he keeps the Democrats stirred up over identity issues and they don’t put forth a focused, clear program to advance the middle-class, they’re toast forevermore.
RIGHT ON MY BROTHER!!!!
It doesn’t matter who’s coming or going. The implementation of unadulterated fascist ideology continues, regardless. Bannon already announced on Bloomberg that he ‘will go to war’ for his Fuehrer to make the fascist agenda stick. This WH cabal isn’t done by a long shot….
4 out of 5 generals prefer an isolated and ineffective president
Speaking of the Robert Kuttner interview, which I did – perhaps Mr Bannon is more of an opportunist than an alt-right sympathizer.
The war he wants with China might have something to do with his first company that the gamers bankrupted. (I don’t really think this, but people should be aware of the fateful interview.)
I am glad he is gone. He clearly stained/shamed the WH, weirdly similar in the sense that Karl Rove did. I really dislike the political shop being in the WH, irrespective of political party. Who campaigns for the next term in the beginning of the first?
Clearly he and Mr Trump are simpatico. Some people think Mr Trump is presentable to the world stage. Neither of them are/were.
You’re so right
can’t wait for the sophistry, false equivalences and whatabouttery from Glenn’s dissemblers and Russian crapflooders
now don’t forget: “democrats” …and “leftists”
so true … time to get back on track with globalism and endless war
yeah, they have a lock on those goods.
You should remove your head from your arse before typing, John.
well i admit it’s hard to distinguish between dems and republicans when it comes to globalism and endless war … the democrats differ mainly in that they want a low-carbon serfdom with abortion rights, while the republicans are looking for something less “sustainable” but with better quarterly numbers
Active duty military and ex military vote. So do national guard reservists.
Ask vet George McGovern what happens to politicians who appear anti-military.
This isn’t such a difficult concept.
Bannon offers them a space in media that gave them the ability to elect Trump.
Trump offers them a space in society that gives them the ability to recruit.
The ‘split’ and how deep it turns out to be will be about which matters most to each splinter group that gathered under the Trump umbrella.
That’s right.
“DOES IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE?
Bannon will simply return to Breitbart and mobilize the neo-nazis which Trump has emboldened and enabled. The White House & Government of the United States will still have an abundant number of racists in control while Bannon musters the troops. ”
Thank You for update.
Maybe. Or maybe Bannon is putting distance between himself and Trump before North Korea blows.
“Narcissist-in Chief”
“that’s the orange-skinned gorilla in the room…”
And the steady deterioration of journalistic standards at The Intercept continues
I may as well be reading HuffPo editorials at this point
Whining much? Trump is all of those things. Don’t like it, then go back to sleep.
You must be under the childish thinking impression that calling an asshole an asshole fails the phony “objective journalism” “standards” you’ve created and bought into in your fantasy world.
The objectivity of the article (or lack thereof) bothers me less than the fact that whatever point it is trying to make is muddled among hyperbole, half-baked speculation, and insults worthy of a schoolyard.
When it comes down to it, the idea that Bannon is some master political strategist central to Trump’s ascent isn’t consistent with him getting the boot (nor with his waning influence inside the Trump administration up to this point). Hasan tries to reconcile this by making it an issue of Trump’s ego, but I don’t consider the links to SNL skits and dubious anonymous BuzzFeed sources that follow to be enough to substantiate this argument. I’m not buying it, this clearly isn’t the complete story here. The precipitation of political factions inside the Trump administration has certainly played a role.
Also likely to be an influence is that Bannon has realized he can act much more freely from outside the White House. I imagine he will remain an asset to the Trump administration. See Bannon’s recent interview with Bloomberg:
“I’m leaving the White House and going to war for Trump against his opponents…”
Great post. Seems to me that the media is acting frantically and irrationally trying to manufacture a narrative that Trump consciously appointed white supremacists to his administration, in order to further isolate him and get him impeached. Since the Russia narrative failed epically, this is their next step.
Thank you! I haven’t seen any major reporting about Russia since that VIPS report was covered in The Nation and Salon, and the flavor of coverage of Bannon today has been very interesting considering he’s been largely ignored by the media for months now. I also saw Newt Gingrich’s recent remarks on Trump’s increasing political isolation. I think what you say makes a lot of sense in this context!
Yes, the game plan has been the same since day 1: Hillary lost, so let’s do everything in our power to smear, tarnish and isolate Trump until either he’s impeached or bows to pressure and resigns. (I personally think Trump is just as much a part of the entrenched establishment as the Clintons, but I digress.) Interestingly enough, Bannon was one of the few people within Trump’s administration who opposed foreign entanglements, e.g. war with North Korea. As you’re no doubt aware, Trump’s been appointing military generals to his cabinet – a disturbing trend as they tend to have a one-track mind…
TickTock makes a good point, try to stay focused. It is important. Where’s your editor? I know, he’s doing two or three peoples’ jobs. So, take TickTock’s advice, do your own editing until you folks have more staff.
How many more editors on staff do you think The Intercept should hire before you’re satisfied that an author wrote what they intended to write, and weren’t pummeled by an editor for having done so?
https://theintercept.com/about/
Amen TickTock! I hope The Intercept maintains their integrity and relevance and stay away from the childish name calling.
Who will the Generals pick?
Mr Hasan – what about the interview with Robert Kuttner?
I didn’t read the news past 7am pacific time.
Thank you for the dreary update – status quo.
It will be interesting when Mr Bannon starts talking to investigators, don’t you think?
Funny, I would of assumed your article today would have been a warning of Islamophobia after the terrorist attacks in Spain and Finland