• Politics
  • Justice
  • National Security
  • World
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • Special Investigations
  • Voices
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Documents
Become A Member
  • About
  • Policies And Reports
  • Become a Source
  • Join Newsletter

© THE INTERCEPT

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Terms of Use Privacy

Non-Denial Denials: The Most Ludicrous and the Most Heinous

Dan Froomkin

Non-Denial Denials: The Most Ludicrous and the Most Heinous

Dan Froomkin

Non-Denial Denials: The Most Ludicrous and the Most Heinous

Dan Froomkin
[This is the fourth post in a series on non-denial denials; see also parts one, two and three.] The most ludicrous but nevertheless most memorable post-Nixon non-denial denial has got to be President Bill Clinton’s finger-waggling statement: I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I’m going […]
Former National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane is sworn in on Capitol Hill before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in Washington, Dec. 8, 1986. McFarlane testifies before the committee that President Reagan gave his approval for an "indirect" shipment of arms to Iran in the summer of 1985. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Iran-Contra and the Non-Denial Denial

Dan Froomkin
Former National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane is sworn in on Capitol Hill before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in Washington, Dec. 8, 1986. McFarlane testifies before the committee that President Reagan gave his approval for an "indirect" shipment of arms to Iran in the summer of 1985. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Iran-Contra and the Non-Denial Denial

Dan Froomkin
Former National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane is sworn in on Capitol Hill before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in Washington, Dec. 8, 1986. McFarlane testifies before the committee that President Reagan gave his approval for an "indirect" shipment of arms to Iran in the summer of 1985. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Iran-Contra and the Non-Denial Denial

Dan Froomkin
[This is the third post in a series on non-denial denials; see also parts one and two.] Non-denial denials should make reporters suspicious. When an official, confronted by a serious charge, denies something different, or uses modifiers, or airily waves off the charge as not worth responding to, that should be an alarm bell. But […]
  • About
  • Policies And Reports
  • Become a Source
  • Join Newsletter
  • Become A Member
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • SECUREDROP

© The Intercept. All rights reserved