Snowden Archive
——
The SIDtoday
Files
Browse the Archive

Mailbag Question: Are More Awards Given to Those Working Highest-Priority Targets?

SUMMARY

A staffer asks if technical workers assigned to top-priority jobs on the Signals Intelligence Strategic Missions List have a better chance of getting promotions. The answer is no. 

DOCUMENT’S DATE

Jul 06, 2005

PUBLICLY AVAILABLE

Mar 01, 2018

1/2
Download
Page 1 from Mailbag Question: Are More Awards Given to Those Working Highest-Priority Targets?
DYNAMIC PAGE -- HIGHEST POSSIBLE CLASSIFICATION IS TOP SECRET // SI / TK // REL TO USA AUS CAN GBR NZL (U//FOUO) Mailbag Question: Are More Awards Given to Those Working Highest-Priority Targets? FROM: SIGINT Communications Unknown Run Date: 07/06/2005 (U) Here's a Q&A from the SID Mailbag Question: (U//FOUO) Promotions within SID are scarce, especially for technical workers, especially for those seeking something higher than a grade 13. Hence my question below: (U//FOUO) Are the chances for promotion to 14 or above increased by a person choosing to work in offices whose projects are closer to the top in the SIGINT Strategic Missions List ? (U) In other words, is the "sexiness" of the technical work you're assigned a major factor in how your Personal Performance Package looks to the evaluators? (C//SI) Those of us who plod away, who deal with WHOLLY EXULT shutting down our dataflows for two days a week because our particular tasks aren't high enough in priority, who get sent home in bad winter weather because we're "non-essential", need to know what we're up against in terms of awards, because in the workaday world, our lives are already gosh-darned tough, and seemingly made tougher by each upper-level decision. Answer: (U//FOUO) The short answer is no. Your chances for or against promotion are not influenced by the target you work. Promotion is based on performance. (U//FOUO) I refer you to questions that were posed a year ago this time -- even before the Strategic Missions List existed, there was concern that people working "sexier" targets were more likely to be recognized and rewarded for their work. This is simply not the case. Question 236: (U//FOUO) Promotions are part of our philosophy of performance-based pay, and, as such, are determined by an individual's performance and accomplishments against specific performance objectives. Competition for performance is fierce and is based on a person's contributions over a period of time and his or her potential for assuming more responsibility in the future. Promotions are not tied to the importance of your job or the sexiness of your target. Question 230: (U) On the question of performance pay: Performance-based pay is a systematic method of compensating employees based upon performance against specific performance objectives. It has nothing to do with the perceived importance (or lack of importance) of the SIGINT target you work or the kudos you receive from customers. Payout (which could be an increase to basic pay or a bonus or a combination of the two) is based on the performance score you earned under the performance evaluation system. The better the performance, the better the reward. "(U//FOUO) SIDtoday articles may not be republished or reposted outside NSANet without the consent of S0121 (DL sid_comms)." DYNAMIC PAGE -- HIGHEST POSSIBLE CLASSIFICATION IS TOP SECRET // SI / TK // REL TO USA AUS CAN GBR NZL DERIVED FROM: NSA/CSSM 1-52, DATED 08 JAN 2007 DECLASSIFY ON: 20320108
Page 2 from Mailbag Question: Are More Awards Given to Those Working Highest-Priority Targets?