Skip to main content

Trump Responds to Idea of Public Campaign Financing With an “Enh”

Trump's endorsement of public campaign financing seemed tepid, especially given that he did not refer to it as either "luxurious" or "classy."

Generated by  IJG JPEG Librar
Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images

Democracy Matters, a national student organization founded “to get big private money out of politics and people back in,” is attempting to get presidential candidates on the record about public funding of political campaigns.

Their latest video features Kyle Chapman, a 19-year-old student at Des Moines Area Community College, trying to get Donald Trump to answer his question at a June 16 event in Iowa.

“What do you think about the idea of publicly financed campaigns?” Chapman asked.

Trump shrugged and said “Enh.” Then he said “I think it’s fine,” before changing the subject.

After mysteriously asserting that a “bigger problem” is the “much bigger amounts of money that are being taken from us, like with babies by other countries,” Trump concluded by noting that “certainly we can think of different forms of campaign finance laws.”

Trump’s endorsement of public campaign financing seemed tepid, especially given that he did not refer to it as either “luxurious” or “classy.” But it did nevertheless contradict the general Republican attitude to public financing, which is strongly negative.

On other occasions Trump has made remarks about money in politics, such as “[Politicians] are controlled fully, they are controlled fully by the lobbyists, by the donors and by the special interests” and “Jeb Bush just announced he raised over $100M. Everyone of those people who contributed are getting something to the detriment of America!”

Another Iowa Democracy Matters member recently asked Hillary Clinton to “name two civic things that you’re going to do to combat money in politics.”

Transcript:

CHAPMAN: Pork-barreling is a term that I learned recently. And it just kind of refers to the idea of how big donors get rewarded with government projects and public contracts. What do you think about the idea of publicly financed campaigns in order to try to curtail that kind of activity?

TRUMP: Enh, I think it’s fine but you know, it’s the least of our problems. A big problem is that, our big problem is that you’re talking about the much bigger amounts of money that are being taken from us, like with babies by other countries. That’s why your Social Security’s in such trouble, that’s why Medicare and Medicaid are in such trouble. Not to mention the theft and abuse of all of that that goes on, which we all know we have to stop it. But the big money, the really big money, has to do with what’s happening to us on trade. We’re losing our jobs, we’re losing our base, we’re losing our manufacturing. And then they’re giving us their money to pay them interest. I mean the whole thing is insane! That’s the real problem. But certainly we can think about different forms of campaign finance laws.

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation