Skip to main content

Talk of Criminally Prosecuting Corporations Up, Actual Prosecutions Down

A new analysis of federal data from Syracuse University finds that the Justice Department’s criminal prosecutions of corporations fell 29 percent from 2004 to 2014, even as criminal referrals to the Justice Department from other federal agencies have risen.

ttttt TRAC - Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse

A new analysis of federal data from Syracuse University finds that the Justice Department’s criminal prosecutions of corporations fell 29 percent from 2004 to 2014, even as criminal referrals to the Justice Department from other federal agencies have risen.

In fiscal year 2014, the Justice Department brought 237 cases against corporations, the lowest number since 2010, and well below the high-water mark of the decade: 398 cases in 2005. The number of convictions fell to 162, well below the Bush administration average of about 240.

The data comes from the Justice Department itself, obtained by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) through a Freedom of Information Act request. TRAC also synthesizes data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission, a division of the federal courts, to arrive at its totals.

Corporate Prosecutions Filed, FY 2004 — 2014 , U.S. DOJ via TRAC

TRAC’s report on criminal prosecutions mirrors the data released in August on enforcement of individual white-collar cases. That showed prosecutions at a 20-year low, down 36.8 percent from the peak.

It’s not for lack of possible cases. Despite the pullback in prosecutions, available data shows that federal agencies continue to find similar amounts of potential corporate misconduct. TRAC’s analysis shows that criminal referrals actually increased by 2.6 percent between fiscal years 2004 and 2014. The Justice Department last year received over nine times as many criminal referrals as they brought criminal cases.

There are also far more corporations today. TRAC’s numbers, based on the most recent IRS data from 2002 and 2012, show a 24 percent increase in total corporations and partnerships. Criminal prosecutions of both employees and the businesses themselves fell, despite the expansion.

The numbers say little about the seriousness of the cases referred or brought. But they do identify a trend of less stringent enforcement.

Just a month ago, the Justice Department, seeking to rehabilitate its image as a diligent enforcer of the law, announced new guidelines for corporate prosecutions, with a focus on individual accountability. But the guideline only pertained to new cases, meaning it could take years to reverse the shrinking trend in the TRAC data.

As it happens, TRAC blames another memo, written by Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip in 2008, for the reduction in prosecution rates. The Filip memo warned prosecutors to “take into account the possible substantial consequences to a corporation’s employees, investors, pensioners and customers” when filing a case.

That preoccupation with collateral consequences has roots in a memo from former Attorney General Eric Holder, back when he was a Justice Department official in 1999.

By highlighting the threat to corporate employees and other possible consequences, the political leadership at the Justice Department gave prosecutors a convenient excuse to neglect to pursue criminal cases, using a standard that no bank robber or drug kingpin ever has the privilege of receiving.

In the five years before the Filip memo, DOJ filed 1,677 cases against corporate criminals. In the five years after, they filed 1,309 cases, a 21.9 percent drop.

Overall criminal prosecutions in the time studied have surged by over one-quarter, TRAC found, mainly due to increased cases for violations of immigration laws. But white-collar criminals and the companies who employ them have seen less enforcement over the period.

TRAC shared their findings with the Justice Department prior to publishing the results, but received no comment.

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation