Skip to main content

Rare Veto Keeps Obama’s Options Open For Closing Gitmo

President Obama broke his cycle of empty veto threats over Guantánamo on Thursday, sending a defense authorization bill back to Congress with a defiant message: “Let’s do this right.”

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 22:  U.S. President Barack Obama signs a veto of  H.R. 1735 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) in the Oval Office October 22, 2015 in Washington, DC. President Obama and Congressional Democrats object to the measure because it uses some $90 billion meant for war spending to avoid automatic budget cuts to military programs.  (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images

President Obama broke his cycle of empty veto threats over Guantánamo on Thursday, sending a defense authorization bill back to Congress with a defiant message: “Let’s do this right.”

It was only the fifth veto of his presidency, and came with a rare bit of flare: a public announcement in front of video cameras.

“This legislation specifically impeded our ability to close Guantánamo in a way that I have repeatedly argued is counterproductive to our efforts to defeat terrorism around the world,” he said. “Guantánamo is one of the premiere mechanisms for jihadists to recruit. It’s time for us to close it. It is outdated; it’s expensive; it’s been there for years. And we can do better in terms of keeping our people safe while making sure that we are consistent with our values.”

The fiscal year 2016 defense budget that arrived on Obama’s desk earlier this week attempted to ban all transfers of Guantánamo prisoners to the United States, heighten the barrier to shift them overseas, and prohibit moves to specific countries.

He also cited concerns about the bill’s use of a budgeting gimmick to circumvent spending caps and its failure to adopt certain reforms,  but Obama was particularly explicit about rejecting Congress’s attempt to keep the U.S. base at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba open.

“Because of the manner in which this bill would undermine our national security,” he wrote in his official veto message, “I must veto it.”

Obama had dramatically ordered the notorious Bush-era offshore prison closed on his first full day in office, in 2009. But by the end of that year it was already clear that his moral scruples were giving way to political calculation.

He proceeded to repeatedly give in to Republican Congressional opposition. For instance, the White House had previously threatened to veto defense authorization bills that contained provisions blocking the closure of the prison in 2011, 2012 and 2014, but Obama had backed down each time.

This time, however, his veto gives critics hope that maybe he would renew efforts to close the prison before he left office.

The Center for Constitutional Rights, which represents many of the men detained at Guantánamo, called the veto “important” but said in a statement that “lawmakers’ attempts to keep Guantánamo open for partisan political gain are no excuse for President Obama’s failure to close the prison.”

The center warned that if he lacks the political will to “take bold steps now, he will fail to close Guantánamo, and that will be a central part of his legacy as president.”

Watch Obama sign the veto:

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation