Support Us

Antonin Scalia’s Death Just Saved Public Employee Unions

Lawyers for an anti-union teachers group fast-tracked the case straight to the high court — but with Scalia dead, their strategy backfired.

Zaid Jilani

March 29 2016, 11:36 a.m.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 11: People against the California Teachers Union rally in front of the US Supreme Court building January 11, 2016 in Washington, DC. The high court is hearing arguments in the Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association case. The case will decide whether California and twenty two other states can make public-employees, such as public school teacher Rebecca Friedrichs, to pay union agency fees. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images

BY SPLITTING 4-4, the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday affirmed the ruling of a lower court in the Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association case — a major win for public employee unions that would likely have been a disastrous loss were it not for the death of conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia:

The Friedrichs case was brought by a group of California teachers who argued they should not be required to pay fees to cover the cost of collective bargaining that the California Teachers Association (CTA) does on their behalf.

The lawyers representing this group of teachers “fast-tracked the case in an effort to speed its arrival at the high court, asking the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2013 to rule against them in order to skip a trial and get straight to the appeals.”

Absent Scalia’s death, this would have been an intelligent strategy. A 5-4 ruling against the CTA would have gutted the ability of public employee unions to make collective bargaining fees compulsory. But Scalia’s unforeseen passing gave unions the split vote they needed to have the lower court decision affirmed.

Top photo: Protests related to the Friedrichs case outside the Supreme Court in early January.