Updated | 4:23 pm
House Speaker Paul Ryan refused to withdraw his endorsement of Donald Trump on Tuesday even as he acknowledged that Trump made “racist” and “indefensible” comments about the Mexican heritage of Gonzalo Curiel, the federal judge overseeing a suit against the defunct Trump University.
In a remarkable 45 seconds captured on video by CNN, Ryan, who is currently the highest-ranking elected official in the Republican Party first called Trump’s comments obviously racist and then immediately urged Americans to vote for him anyway.
Speaking at the launch of an anti-poverty initiative in Washington, Ryan was asked if he had had any regrets about endorsing Trump in light of the candidate’s subsequent attempts to smear the judge based on his ethnicity. In his reply, Ryan denounced Trump’s words as though they could be separated from the man who made them, and argued that voters should still elect him president, since he would be more willing than Hillary Clinton to let a Republican Congress enact its policies.
“I disavow these comments. I regret those comments that he made. Claiming a person can’t do their job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment,” Ryan said. Without pausing to draw breath, he then continued: “But do I believe that Hillary Clinton is the answer? No, I do not. … I believe that we have more common ground on the policy issues of the day, and we have more likelihood of getting our policies enacted, with him than with her. But I do absolutely disavow those comments.”
Pressed by reporters later to explain how he could continue to support a candidate who relies on such racist rhetoric, Ryan later seemed to speak of Trump’s mouth and heart as two separate entities, saying:
I don’t know what’s in his heart, but I think the comment itself is defined that way. So I am not going to defend these kinds of comments, ’cause they’re indefensible. I am going to defend our ideas, I’m going to defend our majority. And I think our likelihood of getting these ideas into law [is] far more likely if we are unified as a party.
As BuzzFeed reported, Ryan told Fox News Radio later that he was not ready to call Trump a racist — just because he made a clearly racist remark about the judge (and then repeated it, again and again). “No, I’m not. I’m saying the comment was. I don’t know what’s in his heart,” Ryan said. “I’m not saying what’s in his heart because I don’t know what’s in his heart and I don’t think he feels that in his heart,” he added.
Later in the day, Rep. Lee Zeldin, a New York Republican who supports Trump, was reduced to making the convoluted argument that although the candidate’s statement was racist, the motivation behind it was not. “He isn’t making that statement because he feels like he is superior because he is white and the judge is Mexican,” Zeldin told CNN. “I don’t believe he is making that statement because internally he feels like he is of a superior race.”
Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) agrees Trump's comments are racist, but won't say Trump is a racist. Tries to argue Obama is! https://t.co/8nAP48i5RM
— Cristina Marcos (@cimarcos) June 7, 2016
Ryan was asked to take a position on Trump’s comments one day after Bloomberg News reported that Trump himself had overruled his staff and ordered surrogates speaking in support of his candidacy to attack reporters who questioned his comments as the real racists.
Trump’s refusal to retract his smear prompted a wave of revulsion from other members of the Republican establishment, including Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Wall Street Journal columnist Bret Stephens.
GOP leaders: Trump making “indefensible, racist” arguments that are “offensive” & “un-American.” He must be elected president. #asickparty
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) June 7, 2016
https://twitter.com/nxthompson/status/739998114149437440
Bret Stephens smacks down a huge swath of the GOP. Civil war on the right: pic.twitter.com/WPgIt5TEzW
— Nick Timiraos (@NickTimiraos) June 7, 2016
What makes this week’s repudiation of Trump’s racist comments about the high-achieving son of Mexican immigrants curious is that it comes a full 51 weeks after he clearly signaled his bias by devoting the second minute of his campaign announcement to a tirade about Mexico supposedly using the United States as “a dumping ground” for its drug addicts, criminals, and rapists.
GOP “shocked, shocked” by Trump’s racism, 51 weeks after he launched his campaign claiming Mexico sent rapists to US https://t.co/nEuKRZwdlp
— Robert Mackey (@RobertMackey) June 7, 2016
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
U.S. Personnel Who Died in Mexico Were Working for the CIA, Sources Say
Two Americans killed in Mexico, previously identified only as “staff from the United States Embassy,” participated in a raid on a drug lab.
The War on Immigrants
ICE Is Looking for Parking in New York City — For a 150-Vehicle Deportation Fleet
With its last contract expiring, activists say garage owners should spurn ICE to avoid becoming complicit in Trump’s deportation blitz.
Voices
How the Lebanon Ceasefire Could Make It Harder to End the War on Iran
The deal is a welcome reprieve from Israel’s bombing — but separating Lebanon from the ceasefire with Iran sets a dangerous precedent.