The Department of Justice’s policies surrounding lengthy gag orders on secret FBI requests for records are unconstitutional, wrote five members of Congress in a legal brief filed Thursday.
When companies or individuals receive these requests, known as national security letters, they are not typically allowed to share any of the content—or even say that they received such a request—except with an attorney. The FBI does not need to consult a judge to file those requests.
“The FBI’s [national security letter] authority is bound by the law and constitutional limits,” reads the brief, which was signed by U.S Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.), John Conyers (D-Mich.), Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.), and Ted Poe (R-Texas).“It is [our] view that the rules currently in place for reviewing NSL nondisclosure orders do not meet the requirements of the USA FREEDOM Act and are unconstitutional.”
The Department of Justice’s protracted review procedures for freeing targets of the gag orders violate the First Amendment, they argued in the brief, which was filed in support of a years-long case being waged by the Electronic Frontier Foundation on behalf of an unnamed client.
According to numbers released by the FBI to Congress, the FBI issued nearly 50,000 national security letters between 2013 and 2015—the vast majority of which still have gag orders.
Very few national security letters have ever been disclosed to the public. Rare cases include three such letters published by Yahoo and another disclosed by the host of a small Internet Service Provider, Nicholas Merrill, who fought for that right in court for more than ten years.
Though the White House typically has jurisdiction over matters of national security, the lawmakers argued this was a special case where congressional interpretation of the law is vital, and they believe the Department of Justice’s failure to remove gag orders attached to these letters after extensive periods of time is not in line with the law.
The FBI and the Department of Justice have been criticized in the past for failing to lift gag orders attached to those secret requests, even after investigations have concluded. According to the USA Freedom Act passed in 2015, non-disclosure obligations are meant to be limited in time.
Top photo: The J. Edgar Hoover Building, the headquarters for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, pictured on May 3, 2013, in Washington, DC.
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
She Opposed His Plan for a Blockchain City. Now He’s Bankrolling Her Primary Opponent.
A crypto mogul gave $2.5 million to a candidate running against state Sen. Nicole Cannizzaro in the Nevada attorney general race.
Israel’s War on Gaza
Mamdani Condemns NYC Expo Promoting Property Sales in Israeli West Bank Settlements
Past real-estate expos that included illegal Israeli settlements have come under scrutiny for discrimination — and led to violent confrontations.
Targeting Iran
Hegseth Clings to Phony Ceasefire to Help Trump Evade War Powers Pressure
War Secretary Pete Hegseth insists “the ceasefire is not over,” despite renewed combat between U.S. and Iranian forces.