On the morning of October 5, Ali Mohammed “Jubahi” Medarij set out early from his family home in al-Hayma, a coastal fishing village on the Red Sea in western Yemen. Every day, the 34-year-old fisherman traveled 9 miles to a local market — not to sell his catch, but to look for work.
The father of five had not taken his boat to sea in months. Eight other fishermen had already gone missing, presumed dead from attacks by the Saudi naval blockade. Jubahi had joined the other fishermen and dragged his boat onto the beach, where it sat idle while he struggled to support his wife, elderly father, and children.
But on that fall day, Jubahi’s trip to the market was successful. He returned in the early afternoon to share a meal with his family, before wandering down to the beach by himself. According to his father, Jubahi slipped underneath an overturned boat to escape the afternoon sun, and — exhausted — closed his eyes to sleep.
He never woke up.
Villagers in al-Hayma told The Intercept they heard rumbling around 3 o’clock in the afternoon. Soon after, they saw a jet from the Saudi-led coalition circling over the coast. Assisted by the U.S. with weapons and intelligence, Saudi Arabia has been bombing and blockading Yemen for 21 months.
“The warplane was hovering toward the shoreline before I saw something with parachutes falling down,” said Yahya Qassem Zabah, a local fisherman. “For a moment I thought that soldiers were landing. Then I heard a number of explosions soon after that.”
What Zabah saw was not a soldier parachuting toward the coast, it was a cluster weapon. In mid-air, its shell casing opened and released cylinder-shaped bomblets, which scattered as they plummeted to the beach.
All at once, like deafening firecrackers, explosions ripped across the sand, splintering, smashing, and overturning fishing boats.
Jubahi’s family found his body among the wreckage in a pool of his own blood. His head had been struck by one of the munitions while he slept. “There was a hole in his head with blood spilled underneath,” Jubahi’s father, Mohammed Omar Medarij, told The Intercept before bursting into tears.The villagers recovered two empty shell casings and three parachutes, which Jubahi’s family kept as evidence and showed to The Intercept. “They took out my son and left these rags behind,” Medarij said, gesturing toward the parachutes.
It was not the first time the villagers had seen such weapons. In December 2015, Human Rights Watch confirmed that coalition warplanes dropped CBU-105 cluster bombs on al-Hayma, damaging multiple homes and seriously injuring at least two civilians.
Shell casings from a BLU-108 submunition of a CBU-105 cluster bomb, recovered in al-Hayma after an attack on October 5.
Photo: Mohammed Ali Kalfood
Saudi Arabia began bombing Yemen in March 2015, seven months after Houthi rebels overran the capital city Sanaa and deposed the Saudi-backed leader, Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi. The U.S. has been a silent partner to the war ever since, supplying targeting intelligence, flying refueling missions for Saudi aircraft, and authorizing more than $20 billion in new weapons transfers. Since the beginning of his administration, President Barack Obama has sold $115 billion in weapons to the Saudis, more than any of his predecessors.
Saudi Arabia is dependent on the U.S. in its bombing campaign, explained Bruce Riedel, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institute and 30-year CIA officer, at an event in April. “If the United States and the United Kingdom, tonight, told King Salman [of Saudi Arabia] ‘this war has to end,’ it would end tomorrow. The Royal Saudi Air Force cannot operate without American and British support.”
An official at the Saudi Embassy declined to comment.
Neither the Pentagon nor the State Department would confirm to The Intercept that the weapons photographed by The Intercept were U.S.-supplied, or that they were CBU-105 munitions. When confronted with photos containing the weapons’ serial numbers, Textron Systems spokesperson Dan Sylvestre declined to comment, telling The Intercept that the photos “raise more questions than answers as far as where those weapons were photographed and under what circumstances.”
Meanwhile, Textron’s video advertisements for the CBU-105 depict munitions that appear to be identical to those photographed by The Intercept.
Cluster weapons have a stigma attached to them, because of the particularly heavy toll they’ve taken on civilians. The weapons disperse miniature explosives over a large area, and a small number of the bomblets typically fail to detonate on impact, leaving behind mine-like explosives that often later kill civilians and destroy farmland. A report by the group Cluster Munitions Monitor found that civilians made up 97 percent of all worldwide cluster bomb casualties, primarily due to their use by the Assad government in Syria and the U.S.-backed bombing coalition in Yemen.
Due to their civilian toll, cluster bombs were banned by a 2008 treaty signed by 119 countries, but not by the U.S., Russia, and Saudi Arabia.
The U.S. has sold hundreds of millions of dollars worth of cluster bombs to Saudi Arabia in recent years. In 2010, the State Department authorized the sale of 1,300 CBU-105 bombs to Saudi Arabia as part of a $30 billion arms sale, and in 2011, another 400, for $355 million.
Foreign Policy magazine reported in May that the Obama administration put a hold on the latest transfer of CBU-105 munitions to Saudi Arabia, likely due to a 2009 export law that forbids the sale of cluster bombs to countries that use the weapons “where civilians are known to be present.”
Bowing to public pressure in August, Textron Systems also announced that it would be phasing out production of the CBU-105, ending the manufacturing of cluster bombs in America. In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Textron explained that CBU-105 sales relied on “both executive branch and congressional approval,” and that “the current political environment has made it difficult to obtain these approvals.”
The Pentagon nonetheless maintains a large stockpile of CBU-105 munitions that it could transfer at a later date. Congress narrowly defeated a measure in June that would have prohibited their export to Saudi Arabia. The Pentagon opposed the measure, worried that it would unfairly “stigmatize” the weapon.
The Saudi coalition continues to use cluster bombs, and other U.S.-supplied weapons, to bomb civilian sites, including homes, factories, markets, hospitals, children’s schools, and a funeral. Human Rights Watch released a report last week documenting further attacks on a prison and water-drilling site.
“After more than 20 months of war, unlawful Saudi-led coalition airstrikes not only continue but have become shockingly common in Yemen,” said Kristine Beckerle, Yemen researcher for Human Rights Watch. “It is hard to see how the U.S. continuing to ship billions of dollars in arms to Saudi Arabia — despite the rising civilian death toll and evidence of war crimes — is likely to do anything other than signal an American stamp of approval for the conduct of Saudi military operations and further put the U.S. at risk of complicity in unlawful coalition attacks.”
Jubahi’s death has thrust his family into poverty. His father, in his mid-sixties, is too weak to earn an income from hard labor. Jubahi’s wife is trying to feed her five children by weaving rope and mats out of palm leaves, but the family is mostly dependent on handouts from the already poor community.
In a country dependent on imports for the majority of its food, strikes against Yemen’s fishing industry have taken a particularly devastating toll. Fishing has declined in the Hodeidah governorate — the province where al-Hayma is located — by 75 percent. Of all of Yemen’s provinces, the U.N. places Hodeidah at the highest risk for famine, and the U.N. estimates that 100,000 children under age 5 are at risk of severe malnutrition. In al-Hayma alone, nearly 300 of the village’s 1,600 children are malnourished, according to local medical staff.
And the Saudi-led coalition has continued to attack fisherman and their ships, accusing them of smuggling Iranian weapons to the Houthis. In one particularly vicious attack in October 2015, Saudi warplanes fired missiles at fisherman anchored off the Red Sea island of Aqban, before Apache attack helicopters strafed the shallows to shoot survivors. The attack killed at least 42 fisherman, and possibly as many as 100.
Reuters reported Wednesday that the United States will halt transfer of munition guidance systems to Saudi Arabia and modify its training for the kingdom’s air force. An administration official who refused to be named confirmed the report to The Intercept.
Top photo: Cars drive on a main road in the Sheikh Othman area, in the southern Yemeni port city of Aden, on May 13, 2015.
“And the Saudi-led coalition has continued to attack fisherman and their ships, accusing them of smuggling Iranian weapons to the Houthis. In one particularly vicious attack in October 2015, Saudi warplanes fired missiles at fisherman anchored off the Red Sea island of Aqban, before Apache attack helicopters strafed the shallows to shoot survivors. The attack killed at least 42 fisherman, and possibly as many as 100.”
Anybody’s guess is as good as or better than mine, but those war crimes that wahabbi “government” has committed and will continue to committ are almost certainly in order to distract the world from forcing them to cease raping women and then imprisoning or murdering them for being rape victims.
No Ice, it is much more insidious than that. They want to control Yemen, because it is very strategically placed. Look on the map.
The Washington Post ran a Nov 30 article that listed the capture of three separate shipments of Iranian supplied weapons to the Houthis:
How Iranian weapons are ending up in Yemen
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/11/30/how-iranian-weapons-are-ending-up-in-yemen/?utm_term=.bf636b9251a1
Although it is entirely possible that the weapons were purchased clandestinely by a third party CIA proxy for the specific purpose of creating the illusion that weapons of Iranian manufacture are being transported by sea to Yemen, I hesitate to suggest such potentialities because:
A. [ ] to do so would draw allegations that I am a conspiracy theorist
B. [ ] I claimed over a year ago that Iran was providing support to the Houthis – a claim that was vehemently denounced by rrheard et al as baseless US propaganda
C. [ ] The Iranian government purportedly has no history of interfering in the internal affairs of other sovereign nations.
D. [ ] The Intercept has chronically failed to acknowledge the possibility that Iranian supplied weapons and logistics to Houthi insurgents are also fueling very bloody outcomes
E [ ] All of the above
The article actually reported five intercepted shipments…
And meanwhile, hypocritical and immoral Americans get apoplectic about Russian hacking and what Russia and the Syrian government are doing in Syria, none of which we have any say in or control over.
The bombings in Yemen are certainly terrible but they pale in comparison to the war crimes and brutal killings that have gone on for years by Assad and supported by the Russians under Putin. It seems odd to devote so much attention to human rights abuses by the US and so little attention to those by Russia.
1. We live in the U.S., not Russia. Therefore, we need to be primarily concerned with what the U.S. does, not what Russia does. A brief mention of what Russia and other countries are doing is appropriate, but since we don’t live, pay taxes, or vote in other countries, we have no control over what they do or don’t do. Additionally, considering all the evil the U.S. does internationally, it’s pure hypocrisy to focus on Russia or any other country.
2. Saying that Russian and Syrian killings are much worse than what Saudi Arabia is doing in Yemen with full U.S. support, including financial and weapons, is just lying propaganda. The U.S. is BY FAR the biggest aggressor and colonialist power in the world; Russia is small potatoes in comparison. Read “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man,” for example.
3. Russia’s and Putin’s actions over the past several years have been defensive ones against U.S. and NATO aggression and expansion. The U.S. and NATO violated their agreement to not expand eastward after the Soviet Union collapsed, but they nevertheless did so almost immediately.
“Bowing to public pressure in August, Textron Systems also announced that it would be phasing out production of the CBU-105, ending the manufacturing of cluster bombs in America. In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Textron explained that CBU-105 sales relied on ‘both executive branch and congressional approval,’ and that ‘the current political environment has made it difficult to obtain these approvals.'”
When the TPP passes will the denial of this sort enact a windfall for the weapons system makers?
The TPP = The end of activism.
The stories out of Yemen are just so bottomlessly sad. It’s funny how people can pick endlessly over something like pizzagate when evidence that the leadership of the United States is perfectly happy to eat children alive is already freely and widely available and yet receives minimal coverage and interest even in alt-whatever circles. But thank you, Intercept.
Our cluster so-called bombs (I would rather call them ‘tools for change and encouraging diversity or TFCAEDs) are 10 to 35 times more humanitarian than Assad’s horrible, deplorable and intolerable barrel bombs.
In fact, in a nation-wide survey and double-blind test, 9 out of 10 dentists picked cluster bombs over barrel bombs.
Yes, but barrel bombs aren’t being used for Houth’ decay.
effing brilliant! well done…
The US and Samantha Powers are painfully hypocritical in their condemnation of Iran, Russia, and Syria’s actions in the battle over Aleppo. This not only sadly demonstrates the failure of our global institutions to stop genocide, but how they look the other way when member states perpetuate it.
What is the logic that the U.S. government uses to explain the continued sales of the weapon? Would be nice if this article at least presented their argument.
We also have to look back to the 2006 vote–brought forth by Diane Feinstein– to ban Cluster bombs; Hillary Clinton–then a Senator– voted against the ban with all the Republicans, and 30 Dems voted for the ban.
8 wars, support for honduran coup, drone killing of civilians and assassinations of US citizens, bombing of hospitals, prosecution of journalists under the espionage act… sound familiar it should. It is occuring under Democratic president and establishment Dems, not Shrub. Time to DROP DEMS, Start a third Party, Boycott MSM, and Occupy the Media… here’s our take, please view, and recommend your alternative media to replace shill journalism like the NY Times- https://youtu.be/d2xnms84N3c
um, is it time to boycott, divest and sanction US ?
This is deplorable, and the US and UK Governments should be utterly ashamed. Supplying the despot Saudi regime with arms that are being used for war crimes, and acts of terrorism is state funded terrorism. The continual supply and use of cluster bombs is an outrage, and totally disgusting. Yemen’s Prime Minister is 100% correct to accuse the UK of war crimes as they have sold the cluster bombs to the Saudis :
Yemen’s Prime Minister accuses UK of war crimes The Independent
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/yemen-prime-minister-uk-war-crimes-abdulaziz-bin-habtour-a7473001.html
While we’re at it, it’s worth noting that Brazil also refused to sign the cluster ban agreement, and although I don’t know enough about our foreign sales amnesty international once reported about possible munitions of brazilian origin being deployed by SA on Yemen too.
Therefore, I think it would be very interesting if TI’s brazilian team did a report on our weapons exports and possible human rights issues it raises.
I kindly second Mathias’ call for TIB to investigate in Brazil & cluster bombs. It would be a very interesting story indeed.
100% GRADE A AMERICAN HYPOCRISY
yet Joe and Mika and Mike and Samantha are all so so so so indignified about the cost of the end of terrorists in Allepo which the US also armed and supported directly or by proxy. And they all cried about the war crimes – not the ones committed by bush cheney netanyahu obama etal, no, they charge the country that put an end to terrorism with war crimes.
This is immoral, unethical and obscene, but few in the good ol’ USofA, even know about it (ignorance abounds) and the few who do know, mostly don’t give a damn.
Seriously, only a bunch of psychopaths would “worry” that an inanimate object designed for one of two purposes (to explode and/or kill human beings or destroy property) was being “stigmatized” or otherwise treated or perceived “unfairly”.
Boo fucking hoo, poor poor Textron, Pentagon and State Department arms dealers.
We truly are the shining city on the hill.
A shining city on a pile of corpses.
A shining city on the dung pile of hypocrisy!
To keep the world in fear of the US. We are so desperate now, bc we have no other real industry to sustain ourselves.
Yemen is one of the globe’s highest strategic location.
Look for the US betterment, of moving in, building and basing there.
Who is in Yemen controls the entire sh with a few friendlies in Australia and Hawaii!
These thingsdonot happen by chance. Good reason.
Enjoy!
“Unfairly stigmatize the weapon”? Of course, how unfair it would be to suggest that there’s something wrong with supplying a weapon system that overwhelmingly kills civilians rather than actual combatants.
That weapon wants a safe space.