Cam Harris, a recent college graduate hoping to build a career as a political consultant, received an unwelcome email from a New York Times reporter this month. As the reporter, Scott Shane, recounted on the front page of Thursday’s Times, he had discovered that Harris was the publisher of a fake news site dedicated to smearing Hillary Clinton.
So Harris did what came naturally. He started to spin. First, he admitted that he had written the hoax news articles casting Clinton as a criminal on his site, ChristianTimesNewspaper.com. Eight of his stories attracted enough attention on social networks to merit debunking by Snopes, the fact-checking site, and one of them, published a month before the election, attracted six million readers with the headline, “BREAKING: ‘Tens of thousands’ of fraudulent Clinton votes found in Ohio warehouse.”
But when he was asked about his motives for posting elaborate disinformation about Clinton online over the course of 11 months, Harris was a little more economical with the truth. Even though he had attacked Clinton relentlessly on Twitter during the campaign, and voted for Donald Trump, Harris told The Times that his goals were purely financial. He had focused on potentially damaging fabrications about Clinton, he claimed, simply because those pieces generated more clicks and so more ad revenue than attacks on Trump.
“I didn’t really have a political motivation whatsoever,” he told Shane in a subsequent Facebook Live interview. “It was a way to make money.”
What Harris failed to mention to The Times, however, is that during the entire time that he was spreading lies about the Democratic presidential candidate, he was employed as a legislative aide and campaign manager for a Republican member of the Maryland state legislature, David Vogt III.
Harris also concealed from The Times that when he sat down to create his anti-Clinton fiction “at the kitchen table in his apartment,” he was living in Vogt’s basement in Brunswick, Maryland. As Maryland’s Frederick News-Post reported on Wednesday, an FEC filing related to Vogt’s failed race for Congress earlier this year listed the same home address for both the state lawmaker and his young campaign manager, Harris.
Vogt fired Harris Wednesday afternoon, after the Times story went online, and said he had no idea what his young aide and tenant had been up to at that kitchen table. “I was shocked to hear that he could do such a thing,” the legislator told The Washington Post.
Harris backed that account in a text message to the Frederick News-Post. “Delegate Vogt was not involved in any way,” he wrote.
He then posted a long statement on Twitter, which included a brief apology and a longer discourse on “the dynamics behind” the spike in election-related fake news.
My response to today's @nytimes story: pic.twitter.com/kgDIyNpndb
— Cam Harris (@camharris_us) January 19, 2017
But even if Vogt was entirely unaware of the anti-Clinton hoaxes regularly published by his aide, the fact that these pieces were produced by a Republican operative during an election campaign suggests that at least some of what we now refer to as the new phenomenon of fake news might be better described by using an older term: “dirty tricks.”
Seen through that lens, Harris — like the many other Trump supporters who concocted fake medical records or spread malicious rumors about Clinton in the guise of news reports — is part of a long tradition exemplified by Watergate-era dirty tricksters like Roger Stone, a longtime Trump adviser.
As Stone boasts on his website, he “was the youngest member of the staff in President Richard Nixon’s re-election campaign in 1972, the notorious CREEP — Committee for the Re-Election of the President. In a New Yorker profile, Jeffrey Toobin explained that Stone’s work for CREEP began when he dropped out of college and found a way to dupe reporters into printing false news:
Stone moved to Washington to attend George Washington University, but he became so engrossed in Republican politics that he never graduated. He was just nineteen when he played a bit part in the Watergate scandals. He adopted the pseudonym Jason Rainier and made contributions in the name of the Young Socialist Alliance to the campaign of Pete McCloskey, who was challenging Nixon for the Republican nomination in 1972. Stone then sent a receipt to the Manchester Union Leader, to “prove” that Nixon’s adversary was a left-wing stooge.
Top photo: Cameron Harris in Annapolis, Md., Jan. 16, 2017.
This young man needs to get out of politics and get a real job as soon as possible. If his amoral character is encouraged, he may be headed for jail next time.
So this is a “major” fake news operation, sort of like how RT is a “major” player in spreading Russian propaganda from 2012?
I guess that is why when you Google “ChristianTimesNewspaper.com” all you get is these stories about a “major fake-news operation” that no one has ever heard of?
For it to be “fake news”, doesn’t someone actually have to read it?
What is really concerning about all this fake news stuff is not the fake news at all. It is the danger that it is being used by the mainstream media and the rest of the establishment as an excuse to censor fringe or opposing opinion.
I am pretty sure that this is what this is really about. These services that are going to tell us what we should listen to and what we should discard, who is monitoring their bias? Who is holding them to account? Are we really expected to trust the mainstream media and rest of the establishment to decide what is fake news or not?
This is another power grab using the same technique they used after 9/11 to introduce things like the Patriot Act. Here, it is an excuse to have more control over speech and information flow. Big media is being challenged by new media where any random person can say something and it can be heard across the world. Big media is losing its grip on information flow and it is terrified. And so its partner, the government.
I would much rather have the electorate have to tackle so called fake news than to have big corporations like Facebook and Google, big media, and the government tell us what to read.
in re: “Sillyputty” below-
Does anyone know if Sillyputty is a troll, a chatbot, a JTRIG bully, or a real person? I am Curious.
Who in hell shot that “interview”. In all my 55 years as news photographer and film cameraman I have never seen such ammateurish garbage. And, who authorized this mackwork to be published online. One cannot hear people talking while the “camera” sails over the set. Jeez, my 7 year old grandson can make better pictures . You talk about fake news, this so-called interview is not much better.
Wait, what? I thought the Russians under Vladimir Putin were responsible for fake news and for rigging the election for Trump.
The REAL fake news so many are trying to ignore:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ut0TaegQ-kw
Vogt fired Harris … and said… “I was shocked to hear that he could do such a thing,” Shades of Captain Renault – https://youtu.be/SjbPi00k_ME
Fake crowds also….
http://news.groopspeak.com/breaking-fec-says-trump-lied-he-paid-actors-to-attend-event/
Fake news? That would be CNN, NBC, CBS, FOX and the rest of the government controlled outlets using brainless actors to parrot official propaganda!
Really? Do some research. FOX rates as fake – they are a propaganda machine. NBC / CNN/ CBS = may not be perfect, but hardly ‘government controlled’. Get more news online – and do so from MANY DIFFERENT SOURCES…otherwise you may not be able to differentiate real from fake.
Now we understand how the election hacking was done , multiply by thousands this example of fake news, and you got an election hacking, this guy should be put in jail.
Along with CNN?
And yet still amateurs compared to the mammoth fake news operation, The Fox “News” Channel
I could have sworn that Cam told the NYT that he voted for Hillary. Please check that.
Still not worse than paying people to bring violence to opposition political rallies and colluding with media to push false stories.
Exactly!
I am a moderate from a strong conservative political socialization.
Through my experiences growing up among conservatives, and then later gaining perspective interacting with my liberal college friends and seeking a broader understanding through forums and think tanks on both sides, I have learned that our team sport politics hides the underlying truth from us, that we are far more alike than we are different, and that our partisan politics does us a disservice by encouraging us to be adversarial when amicable and mutually respectful solutions to our conflicts of interest are very much available to us.
I have often criticized our corporate mainstream media, including FNC and Limbaugh with the other outlets from the center to the left, for falsely dividing us against ourselves, keeping us too distracted and weak to stand up to the more important problems in our society. A half truth is often just as damaging as a lie when framed to divide, and our media industry has allowed the profit motive to steer them towards division and controversy at every turn because it gets more attention.
I hope our civil discourse makes an example out of this guy. He is the lowest form of political pond scum, and doesn’t deserve to ever be heard from again in print.
And every single one of our corporate owned media outlets needs to look at that example, and see that if they don’t start presenting us with information about the world in a way that makes us better educated about our fellow citizens, and better equipped to engage in the civil discourse to solve our problems, they should be next to disappear from the conversation.
The time for telling people what they want to hear to make them feel smarter and more superior than they are, at the expense of not only their own perspective, but their trust and brotherhood with their fellow citizens, and even their own freedoms, needs to end. It needs to end now, and we must take every legal necessary step to make it happen.
Thank you for your well thought out comment. I was mortified to learn that Voices of America is now Corporate owned and may soon become (may already be) Donald’s propaganda outlet.
New word. Trumpence.
Tuppence a bag.
Captain Rénault: “I’m shocked! shocked to find you have gambling here!”
Croupier: “Here are your winnings, sir.”
Captain Rénault: “Thank you.”
INTERVIEWER: Why do you rob banks?
WILLIE SUTTON: Because that’s where the money is.
In your in-depth reporting you claim that this impacted the election results? Did you find 1 person who voted based on this information? Russian or American?
He didn’t make that claim, because, same as you, he doesn’t know for certain if it did. Are you claiming one way or the other? If not, why are you asking, in an accusatory manner, about something that wasn’t mentioned in the article?
I have friends who totally read and believe this news outlet and have sent many of their stories out to show others. Yes this man was believed because of the word Christian in the name.
Mackey, to whom may we track your fake news??
Prove it.
You want me to prove a question??? Brilliant.
Mr. Mackey
“…….What Harris failed to mention to The Times, however, is that during the entire time that he was spreading lies about the Democratic presidential candidate, he was employed as a legislative aide and campaign manager for a Republican member of the Maryland state legislature, David Vogt III……..”
Cam Harris is nothing more than a young and creative liar. While he may have been discredited, no doubt some doors will open for him because of his successful campaign of fake stories. His parents should be proud. After all, Cam has a world class pathological liar as his mentor entering the White House today. Of course, fake news stories (or dirty tricks) have been apart of the political process as long as democracy has existed – for both parties.
Regardless, the political establishment is hardly blameless for the election of Trump – and no one exemplifies the establishment quite like the entitled Hillary Clinton who was a terrible candidate promoted by the “neutral” DNC. I couldn’t be happier that we don’t have to listen to her State of the Union address for the next four years, but are we any better off with Trump behind the mic? Only time will tell. One thing is certain; however, employment in the factcheck.org industry will skyrocket!
What’s he doing living with his boss? That’s downright creepy.
Reminds me of the story of Pinal County Sheriff Babeau’s live in web master, or Nigel Farage’s aide who was taken away in handcuffs as the two were leaving the US after the RNC Convention. Babeau’s live in was also his lover, but they had a falling out after he caught the sheriff cheating on him online.
Nigel’s aide was said by the FBI to be laundering illicit money on the dark net and then blackmailing his stupid clients. He was also using an alias, so how Nigel missed this, I dunno.
So I get these sleazy old men asking young things to do their dirty work and their laundry for them for HOUSING. Babeau’s web master didn’t even have a visa to work here.
Yep. Thet Hillary MADE the right hire, pay, and listen to Cam Harris. It’s all HER fault.
How do you halt the spread of fake news? By holding the authors accountable. So great job, nyt, for kissing this guys feet repeatedly for doing you the honor of talking to you
So what.
Fake news is legal and thanks to Fox’s court win standard practice in US media.
The FL court ruled that Fox News can present fabricated stories as real news without disclaimers or notices as it considers this type of activity a 1st Amendment right.
Non story, absolutely all above the board regardless of what the slimeball who did it spins.
In other words: if you want to get all outraged make sure irt something to be outraged about and not just standard practice for whatever entire industry does it.
i hate to call people idiots but i cant seem to help myself where you are concerned.
the issue is not that we know it is happening ..the issue is identifying it .
dont you understand the meaning of that?
One has nothing to do with the other. You’re a dummy and this is definitely newsworthy.
Republicans: the party of people whose votes count more because of what state they live in, of people whose votes aren’t disqualified by systems rigged against the poor, the party of people whose votes can be cast in minutes rather than hours of waiting, the party of people whose votes are gerrymandered out to count like the votes of ten, the party of people whose votes are tricked out of them by fake news, the party of people who win what votes they get ‘honestly’ by breaking into computer systems and/or hyping up trivia taken out of context. And even then, they can scarcely manage to finesse an “election” victory.
Sounds like a rigged election. I have heard that before during the campaign…..but not from your candidate.
Its good that he apologized however that still does not take away from the fact that he is a crooked lying sack of turds who is basically trying to come across as a victim. No he got a taste of his own medicine and in time will be an obscure memory just like his career.
It’s nice to read a story about a fake news operative. Such people are vital to a functioning US democracy, but too often don’t receive credit for the hard work they do. And now they are under threat from organizations that publish authentic documents, such as Wikileaks, that attempt to subvert the political process by providing the voters with the truth. This dangerous new development may temporarily provide a partisan advantage to one political party over the other. But in the long run, it endangers the very survival of the two party duopoly. Hopefully, the parties recognize this and will empower more fake news operatives like Mr. Harris in order to preserve their hold on political power.
+10.
This article is a disappointment. A Republicam operative? He’s a basement dwelling goof to a state representative. Sure he’s a Republican but he’s no operative. I expect more the the Intercept.
And that is why the USvoters decided that it was time for a businessman in the White House instead of another crooked politician ! The politicians have only themselves to blame.
Yes, ever so wise of us to elect a crooked businessman rather than a crooked politician.
Politician have only themselves to blame since they created and sustained the system.
Uh, politicians in the USA are bought…by business folks…Goldman Sachs the most glaring example.
And, politicians ARE businessmen…in the business of profitting by being elected.
It’s bad pill the Republicans takes the American people down we lose so mush when that are in office you can see the cabinets for the nation is 100% different than the tax paying American.
The vast majority of US voters live in willful ignorance and if you asked the average Trump supporter why they voted for him the majority of the time their answers never align with who the man actually is. They’ve been duped by this con man.
We know that diehard Trump voters are fools. Now, the DNC, full of neo-liberal bright lights, supporting a candidate who used a slightly modified Barry Goldwater campaign button, couldn’t beat a guy who did everything he could to lose!
I’m pretty sure every Trump voter knew exactly why she/he voted for him. The good thing about democracies is that in 4 years time they can vote for another candidate if they feel duped.
Sour Puss strives to overcome Putin Trump Stress Disorder.
Rx. #Get ALife
Intercept Offers Major Lens On Fake News Op
Headline should have just compared him to Roger Stone, case closed, instead of implying he was part of an organized Republican fake news effort.
One of life’s little disappointments is clicking through to an Intercept article, only to see that it’s by Robert Mackey.
It’s tabloid journalism online, about politicians. What a story.
Really? Pretty dull comment.
did you forget the last few paragraphs of your artcile? This seems like it was going somewhere and then just ends abruptly
The problem is that while the GOP has gone down a hole into insane beliefs — reaching its peak with Trump and his acolytes — the Democrats are also now in the grips of delusions and wackiness. They’re just a tad slicker and more polished.
The Dems only appear more polished, which is an illusion, because they put their money on constant crisis PR, and fetid identity politics, instead of their faith in old fashioned graft.
Secret courts, secret laws, secret evidence, secret testimony a surveillance state that know what’s inn our dresser drawers at all times; rape shield laws, mother knows best an mother know everything because she’s a mother; and privilege narratives of domestic violence and bad menz all started in family courts and a generation of women who bought into the scheme of privilege via ethical compromises that raised two generations of kids who are compliant, and easily led by the ‘one opinion per household scheme’ and blind to what totalitarianism is because they have no counterpoints.
Maybe it’ time to remove the veil of privileged discourse from American women who built the police state infrastructure that we see today and get them back on board with human rights at home? The entirety of the last three waves of ‘feminism’ has co-opted equality at the womb and it’s associated inferority complexes.
Or, as the SJW crowd would call that organ of its discourse ‘ the perpetual crime scene of endless, ongoing, traumatic violent rapes and horrific abuse that no one can talk about unless they have one, and then, only in a tight controlled, safe space with no blowback or accountability; and especially with impunity (there’s an anti-feminist joke in there somewhere).’
Yup. silencing is a great tool to create wackiness, as studies have shown in trapped mice, propaganda delivery systems, and bonobo society when matriarchs rule with iron foreplay.
Oh- and the Democrats who lost their narrative stranglehold on the vagendered politics of these previous eras certainly didn’t escape their own blackmailers, I am sure of that. Blackmail, and especially graymail are known to have a backlash effect.
Hahaha. NOT laughing, as we no see the NSA turn all of it’s goodies over to th other 16 graymailing agencies.
Mom: “Where were you last night?”
Kid: ” I was at Michelle’s house.”
Mom: ” Are you SUUUURE you want that to be your best answer?
Kid: Um- can I call dad first?
Mom: You don’t have a dad to call. I made you in a test tube, and besides, my 17-Agencies-full-of-‘goodguys’-who-know-what-you-did-last-night phone app told me you’re not telling me something. And it’s NEVER wrong.
Kid: the gig was up in 1993….
Mom: No, hon, Satanic Abuse and career profiteering via leveraging generations of children’s hearts, mind’s and futures via strange tales and mythological beasts and bizarre social rituals with immense propaganda pay-offs is no longer a hoax- it’s the law!
Kid: Alright, mom, you win. I was doing my homework at Robo-warrior Friendlie’s kid dungeon.
Mom: Thank’s hon. I like it when you tell the truth.
“Maybe it’ time to remove the veil of privileged discourse from American women who built the police state infrastructure that we see today and get them back on board with human rights at home?”
With this, and the rest of this mostly well-spelled screed, we have misogyny personified.
You need help, and I don’t think you’ll get it here.
Sillyputty-
You just won SJW bingo- enjoy your windfall.
Go ahead-whinge on about misogyny- see how well that went for you in the last election? What?! Demand accountability from those privileged women who allied themselves to the ‘security at the expense of liberty’ paradigm??
MISOGYNY!!!!
But generally speaking, people who speak from their vaginas wouldn’t know real misogyny if it bit them in the ass.
The thing you alt-right folks don’t get yet (it’s coming, though) is that you are a minority of a minority.
Although many blame you for Trumps ascension, the alt-right didn’t elect him, the disenfranchised lower and middle classes that deigned to get out and vote did – vagina’s or not.
I’m not a supporter of much of what Trump proposes, largely because the policies he does espouse (that are remotely discernible) are the same-old-same-old, something that many from the disenfranchised lower and middle classes who voted for him are finally realizing, much to their dismay.
Trump’s presidency has brought us a few good things already, though: it’s highlighted the entrenched hold that the already powerful have on our democracy and, in your case, it’s brought human cockroaches like you and yours out into the bright light of day – things that need mitigating in order to prevent their cancerous growth from weakening America even further.
Sillyputty- You are the actual alt-Right, and likely a troll paid to monitor online speech, and you likely think others can’t see it because of your entrenched establishment/hidden state privilege.
My last vote of record was Obama, and that, with a new immigrants finger print- and I don’t vote anymore in elections.
Then, I will give you a gift you haven’t earned (for the sake of anyone reading this years from now), and suggest that regardless of the entitled and privileged-sort of veiled and threatening- perspective you have (let me guess-white, past middle aged, female/same affiliated)- even you are occasionally right.
To whit, you noted that my comments are “misogynist by definition” or something, right? Let me tell you- I re-read what I wrote, and I realize that what I wrote could be taken two ways! And, that you are are also a nitpicking cherry picker.
So- to the issue: I wrote “get them back on board with human rights at home?”
And you- privileged, and likely white, and likely a democrat, and likely female, heard “OMFG, did he just tell me to get back into the kitchen? RAAAAAAPE!”
And what I actually said, and intended to say, and anything above that sentence fragment inferred, was that your class isn’t doing a damn thing for anyone other than yourselves- and it might help if you got involved in prison reform, or the issue of secret courts and secret laws, and secret other BS that has overtaken our country-you know, our HOME-land.
But you knew that when you cherry picked the fragment.
And while you and your ‘security at the expense of liberty statists” feel secure, many others do not, because it is the senators that YOU vote for/blackmail/buy off that made it all possible. Here at HOME, where the rest of us live, some of us are aware that the coup de tat of the praetorian guard needs to get bitch slapped.
But it was on YOUR watch where this happened. so, what your selective ear heard “get back in the kitchen” actually means :get off your ass and into issues that ain’t about just you.”
But you see- you are the exact, socially engineered knee jerk that Trump counted on to hand him this election- you are incapable of thinking outside your *ahem* “box.”( for all anyone here knows, you are a chatbot)
And this- just this sort of entitled, veiled threat from you cowards is what fueled the hidden surveillance apparatus: “it’s brought human cockroaches like you and yours out into the bright light of day – things that need mitigating”
It was that that gave him the election- and you, doing nothing about stopping the surveillance and police power he inherits from King Obama; and now, he might well turn it on you- and “mitigate” YOU.
See how that works? But my real guess is that you are one of the exact .mil/security contractor/ jaded gov’t worker types who will benefit either way- and your speech suppression tools are your actual dildoes with which your type have screwed the Constitution.
A minority of a minority? We’ll see about that, as we work to mitigate you.
Sillyputty-
The thing about fascists/zionists/whitefemalevoters/Ukrainiansexslavesfrom1915/progressiveshiksasingermany1927 like you, is that your minds are premised on false dichotomies, and you suffer from the callous indifference of other brutish animals(pigs, for example)-and you are incapable of hearing anything that doesn’t flatter your purpose-to whit, your initial cherry pick of what I wrote is hasbara-SJW 101.
“get them back on board with human rights at home?”
Yeah- here in AMERICA where we live- our HOME-land. Not over in the Negev, where your types masquerade as crusaders for Israeli policy cum American policy as your wives cook you dinner wearing straw wigs.
You see, no one want you cooking for us anyways. Or even as guests in our kitchens- you have bad table manners and soiled agendas.
But your types are pretty good at derailment .Have no doubt about it- your veiled threats to “mitigate” me, personally, are a two way street- you clowns are outed-and not as hidden and covered as you think. We the people will see you to the door.
Feverishly anticipating your next article on Trump’s intelligence “dossier”, which was passed on by multiple media agencies (all wanting to destroy Trump’s election outcome) yet published by Buzzfeed… I’ll check back periodically.
Journalistic Integrity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism_ethics_and_standards
From the wikipedia page linked above:
public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility.
A Fake News site seeks to misinform. When evidence is presented that contradicts their story, they double down and refuse to retract.
When WaPo received a report from what they considered a credible source that there was an attack on the grid, they reported it. As more facts came to light that disproved, they updated the original article to retract the story and publish more information that they collected
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-hackers-penetrated-us-electricity-grid-through-a-utility-in-vermont/2016/12/30/8fc90cc4-ceec-11e6-b8a2-8c2a61b0436f_story.html?utm_term=.641904762201
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-government-hackers-do-not-appear-to-have-targeted-vermont-utility-say-people-close-to-investigation/2017/01/02/70c25956-d12c-11e6-945a-76f69a399dd5_story.html?utm_term=.006ce9bcec84
Nobody gets everything right all the time. Some choose to get things wrong. Others don’t. That’s the difference.
So how is what this person did any different from say a Post reporter publishing a 100% false story about Russia hacking Vermon’t electric grid and other reporters tweeting that out? Seems like a very fine line between intentionally made up fake news and 100% false stories where no good faith attempt was made to verify the story prior to publication.
While the post story was false, there was at least some kernel of stuff that could be twisted into the “Russiadiddit” conspiracy theory. This one involved making something up out of whole cloth.
Of course, at least this guy is being held accountable, unlike WaPo.
Seeing Cam Harris advertise himself as an informed voice that can contribute to a conversation on media ethics is flat out disturbing. He clearly understands the existing biases of a significant part of the electorate and he enthusiastically admitted to exploiting the narratives for his own gain, yet I believe him when he says that he thinks his actions did not contribute to the ongoing polarization in American politics. It’s cognitive dissonance at its best.
Cam, if you’re reading this (you seem to be the person that would analyze the comments of an article written about you), you are wrong. Your work legitimized a cancerous whisper in our country’s political dialogue, amplifying its toxic voice. You can separate yourself from your actions as much as you like, but that does not change the fact that it was you, Cam Harris, that manipulated people’s prejudices for the sake of your own benefit to the detriment of our discourse. I hope that you will some day articulate the moral vacancy of your decisions. Learn to live by principles that extend beyond making money.
Here’s the surprising thing about this story. The Intercept, which has spent the past year attacking Hillary Nd Democrats, finally writes a story critical of Republicans. Greenwald has done more to turn Bernie voters away from Hillary, and help elect Trump, than any “journalist” this side of Breitbart. And now, finally, they start to focus on Republican malfeasance. The barn door is closed, too late to make up for your havkery. Trump sends his warm regards…
Thanks. Great article.
“watergate style dirty tricks”, oh like the clinton and the dnc pulled on sanders.
Do you honestly think that if the tactics, as low as some of them were, used by the dnc were as bad as inundating outlets with “fake news” of which most amounted to character assassination, Bernie would’ve come around and support Clinton? Come on… I bet the Barbie camp pulled off even worse stuff (i.e. Clinton’s “artful smear campaign” was real if your think about it). Bernie saw the dnc emails for what they were… some of his supporters are being what the kids call these days “extra.”
It’s not possible to smear HRC because there’s no crime she hasn’t committed. Furthermore, in the annals of fake news, nothing quite compares to The Trumpdown.
Only in the age of “fake news” would someone accuse someone who hasn’t been charged/indicted/arrested of committing a crime… you are exactly what’s wrong with our country. Get some sort of an education to broaden your logical/critical thinking skills asap.
Yes, Clark, yours is the take-down of an educated man with “critical thinking skills” – critical enough to run straight for his bucket of personal smears rather than debate content of Chas’ assertion. Also, you raise a fine point: In a bizarre twist of critically thought circular “logic”, if someone isn’t charged with a crime, they obviously didn’t commit one. You’re no fun.
“Furthermore, in the annals of fake news, nothing quite compares to The Trumpdown.”
Nothing; literally.
Both sides were doing it, hard. Worse the news was often fake news, and still is apparently (they hacked the electrical grid! Ahhhhh!; not to mention apparently all the paid off journalist and their unbiased opinion) Then there were the troll warriors working bullet point arguments. The worse though is when the bullet points began to parrot out of the people I knew. A fake news article can at least be debunked fairly quickly (most, certainly not all). Spewing shoddy rhetoric and and pushing generalizations and bigotry to cover up your own candidates corruptness (don’t care which side you’re looking at here, the view was a staggering pile of corruption) is more like brainwash, but the prop was so heavy I don’t blame those that took part in the spewing. Then there was the “real” news omission campaigns, such as omitting an entire state, North Dakota, from the “24-hour” news cycle all year long.
i dont see how anyone can figure that hellary clinton – the woman with 2 faces – can have opposing points of view where both are not fake which points had arisen from the same facts.
maybe she could get a job in vegas in a magic show
Your comment shows a distinct incapability of figuring out what a fact is. Here you have an article wherein a creator of fake news is exposed and even admits to creating fake new, and you try to say that the content was fact based.
I don’t see wherein he tried to say that at all.
The Intercept loses credibility every time they publish a Mackey article.
Funny how you people can never refute the information in an article.
i didn’t read the article carefully, but seems like he missed claiming the guy was a putin operative. this isn’t like him.
There wasn’t a single mention of Russia or of Putin. My theory is that only part of Mackey’s story was posted. A botched upload, perhaps.