A top state election official expressed alarm Wednesday that the federal government withheld information about cyberattacks against the U.S. election infrastructure from state-level governments that actually run the polling systems.
Connie Lawson, the Indiana secretary of state and president-elect of the National Association for Secretaries of State, said that last summer intelligence agencies found that some 20 state networks had been probed by Russian hackers. Yet, she said, the Department of Homeland Security repeatedly assured her that no “specific or credible threats” existed to the 2016 election. Lawson said the FBI had warned state officials about attempts to infiltrate some election systems, but the federal government hadn’t expressed the full scope of the attacks.
“In more recent days, we’ve learned from a top-secret NSA report that the identity of a company providing voter registration support services in several states was compromised,” Lawson said. She was referencing a report from The Intercept on a National Security Agency document that claims Russian hackers launched a cyberattack against a U.S. voting software supplier and more than 100 election officials just days before the election.
“It is gravely concerning,” Lawson went on, “that election officials have only recently learned about the threats outlined in the leaked NSA report, especially given the fact that the former DHS Secretary Jeh Johsnon repeatedly told my colleagues and I that no specific or credible threats existed in the fall of ’16.”
Lawson questioned why the intelligence community held back on notifying state officials. “It is unclear why our intelligence agencies would withhold timely and specific threat information from election officials,” she said.
She told the committee that in order for state election officials to credibly run their own elections, they had to fully understand the threat from nation-state hacking. “No secretary of state is currently authorized to receive classified threat information from our intelligence agencies,” she said, adding that the dynamic “threatens to erode public confidence in the election process as much as any foreign cyber threat.”
Jeh Johnson, the Obama administration Homeland Security chief, could not be reached for comment in time for publication. This story will be updated if he responds.
Under the Constitution, states take the lead on running their own elections. But the specter of nation-state hacking has lead the federal government to offer increased technical assistance to the states.
In January, the Department of Homeland Security under then-President Barack Obama designated election equipment as “critical infrastructure” — a move that was supposed to help the Department prioritize requests for cybersecurity assistance from state election officials. The Trump administration has publicly stated that they support the designation.
Lawson, however, told the Intelligence Committee that the Obama administration never provided clarity on what the designation meant: “At no time between August of 2016 and January of 2017 did NASS members” — those in the National Association for Secretaries of State — “ever have a thorough discussion with DHS on what the designation means.”
Prior to Lawson’s testimony, the committee questioned multiple high-level officials from the Department of Homeland Security. Each repeatedly testified that they had a high confidence that Russian hackers did not tamper with vote totals in the election.
Top photo: Republican Connie Lawson speaks during a viewing event on Nov. 4, 2014, in Indianapolis.
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
Voices
Big Finance Might Be Dooming the SPLC — Even Before Its Day in Court
Fidelity, Charles Schwab, and Vanguard are tamping down on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s donations as the government’s de facto censors.
Voices
Tennessee GOP Moves to Decimate Black Voting Power After Supreme Court’s Blessing of Jim Crow
With the Supreme Court blessing racial gerrymandering, Tennessee’s GOP rushed to eliminate the state’s only majority-Black congressional district.
Amid Hantavirus Panic, the Ivermectin Super Fans Are Back
Those who cheered ivermectin as a Covid-19 treatment are now making unsubstantiated claims about its use against hantavirus.