Skip to main content

1983-84: U.S. Withdrawal From Lebanon

Shortly after the U.S. military was sent into Lebanon’s civil war, hundreds of Americans were killed in a suicide bombing. After taking conflicting positions, Joe Biden wanted the U.S. to get out.

An American Marine Second Lieutenant stands with his back to rescue workers swarming the ruins of the American embassy after a suicide bomber attacked killing 63, including 17 Americans among them CIA station chief Robert Ames, Beirut, April 18, 1983. The US Marines were there as part of the failed Multinational Force peacekeeping intervention in the Lebanese Civil War. FDM-1349-8.  (Photo by Francoise De Mulder/Roger Viollet via Getty Images)
A U.S. Marine and rescue workers are seen at the ruins of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, following a suicide bombing attack on April 18, 1983. Photo: Francoise De Mulder/Roger Viollet via Getty Images

On October 23, 1983, a series of buildings used by a U.S.-led multinational military force in Beirut were attacked with two truck bombs driven by suicide bombers. Among the sites hit was a barrack housing U.S. Marines. More than 240 U.S. personnel were killed, the vast majority of them Marines, along with 51 French soldiers and a half-dozen civilians. Following his earlier conflicting public positions on Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon, which eventually led to the deployment of U.S. forces, Joe Biden joined calls for the U.S. to withdraw its forces after the terrorist attacks. “We’ve got to change this crazy policy,” he said. “It’s the wrong policy, in the wrong country, at the wrong time. Our objectives have not been achieved, and it is time to change our role.” Biden told Reagan, “It’s time to bring those Marines back, and it’s time for us to have a coherent foreign policy. We don’t have one.” Biden introduced a Senate resolution aimed at securing “the prompt withdrawal of the multinational force from Lebanon.”

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation