The White House used a photo that was digitally altered in its PR campaign against resistance to the federal agents’ assault on Minnesota.
A Google digital watermarking system initially flagged that the image had been manipulated with Google’s AI tools. Later tests after the publication of this article resulted in different responses — raising questions about the consistency of Google’s SynthID system.
In the original photo, local civil rights activist Nekima Levy Armstrong was shown being escorted by authorities after her arrest in connection to a protest against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at Cities Church in Saint Paul, Minnesota.
The version published by the White House’s official X account showed an image that had been altered to make it appear as if Levy Armstrong were openly weeping.
“I was there when they arrested her, and she definitely wasn’t crying — she was calm, rational, and dignified,” said Jordan Kushner, an attorney for Levy Armstrong. “This is part and parcel of a fascist regime where they literally invent reality to serve their fascist agenda.”
According to an initial Intercept analysis using Google SynthID — a program that identifies hidden markers used by Google AI tools on photos — the photo had been altered with the tech giant’s generative AI tools. Subsequent tests at Google’s request produced inconsistent results. Though Google’s tool initially stated that the crying image had been manipulated using its AI, a later test claimed that image was authentic. (A Google spokesperson said, “We’re trying to understand the discrepancy” — but did not answer repeated questions about it.)
In response to questions about the altered photo, a spokesperson for the White House referred The Intercept to a tweet from White House spokesperson Kaelan Dorr lashing out at “the people who feel the need to reflexively defend perpetrators of heinous crimes in our country.”
“Enforcement of the law will continue,” wrote Dorr. “The memes will continue.”
The original, unaltered image showing Levy Armstrong looking stalwart first appeared on the web in a pair of tweets by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, according to several image search engine tools.
About a half hour later, the White House posted its altered image showing Levy Armstrong in tears — including text labeling her as a “far-left agitator” and accusing her of “orchestrating church riots.”
The White House X account appears to have been the first place the altered image appeared on the web, according to the image search tools.
Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Levy Armstrong’s arrest on Thursday. Along with Chauntyll Louisa Allen and William Kelly, Levy Armstrong faces charges under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, a 1994 law designed to limit anti-abortion protesters from impeding patients from seeking care.
The arrests followed days of outrage online from the right over a protest on Sunday in which anti-ICE demonstrators entered the Cities Church, where a local ICE official serves as a pastor, according to The Associated Press.
“Religious freedom is the bedrock of this country,” Bondi wrote on X Thursday. “We will protect our pastors. We will protect our churches. We will protect Americans of faith.”
Jeffrey Lichtman, a defense attorney with numerous high-profile federal cases under his belt, told The Intercept that the post could conceivably have a prejudicial effect as the case against her proceeds.
“This altered photo makes her look weak and scared, and some people may interpret that as guilt,” Lichtman said. “I’d try to use it as evidence that this was a political prosecution. This isn’t, like, some aide that works in a congressional office somewhere, this is the White House, and it’s clear the White House controls Pam Bondi, and she’s the one responsible for this arrest.”
Ron Kuby, a veteran civil rights lawyer, told The Intercept that the problem lay less in the meme than in the prosecution itself.
“As a defense lawyer, I’d work hard to make sure it wasn’t repeated, but it’s not going to result in dismissal of charges or any meaningful sanction from a judge,” Kuby said. “This is just Thursday in America. The outrage is not the graphic — the outrage is that they turned a simple disorderly conduct case into a federal prosecution for their propaganda efforts.”
Update: January 22, 2026, 5:27 p.m. ET
This story has been updated to reflect that Google declined to comment.
Update: January 24, 2026
This article and its headline were updated after subsequent tests of Google’s AI watermarking tool provided inconsistent responses about whether the image the White House posted on X had been manipulated by Google’s own AI tools.
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
Voices
Israel Will Keep Occupying Lebanon Despite Ceasefire
Reduced violence is welcome, but the Gaza “ceasefire” has meant continued genocide. We can't let them get away with it in Lebanon.
Israel’s War on Gaza
The Dam Breaks: Democratic Senators Overwhelmingly Reject Arms Sales to Israel
Despite their defeat by Senate Republicans, bills seeking to block arms sales to Israel found widespread Democratic support.
Chilling Dissent
Armed Off-Duty Cop Tried to Incite Violence at a High School Anti-ICE Protest
“My plan is legitimately to just let them all assault me and you guys arrest them all,” the Phoenix cop told fellow police after the incident.