Documents
DuPont Acceptable Exposure Limits List
Mar. 24, 2017
t?l.3251/
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
EXPOSURE LIMITS (ASL) LIST pRBpAcg
ABLS
AELs are exposure limits for chemicals (or for levels of
physical agents) set by the DuPont ASL Committee. arr: specify
Time-Weighted Average (TWA) airborne concentrations, doses or
biological limits which should not be exceeded, and applicable
time periods.
AELs may be set to prevent health effects from exposures for
full workshifts (8- or 12-hour or to prevent effects from
shorter period exposures such as irritation, narcosis, odor or
nuisance (15-minute TWA). As a general guide, excursions to
which short-period AELs apply should occur no more than four
times per shift and a recovery period of approximately 60 minutes
is required between excursions. In addition, the corresponding
full shift (8- or 12-hour) art. should not be exceeded.
hats are set by the DuPont ASL Committee, which includes
experts in toxicology, industrial hygiene, occupational medicine,
pathology, and epidemiology. AlLs are based on the best
available information from industrial experience, animal studies,
and controlled human studies. They are guidelines based on
informed judgment, and are not fine limits between safe and
dangerous concentrations. -They are not for use as relative
toxicity indexes, limits for continuous uninterrupted exposure,
or proof or disproof of health effects. They should be
interpreted and applied by appropriately qualified personnel.
Specific questions or consequences of occasional excursions above
an ASL should be addressed to the Safety, Health and
Environmental Affairs (SHIA) manager for your business or staff
function. DuPont Engineering Standard provides
guidelines for evaluation of air sampling data.
An AEL is established in three steps. The first step is a
request for an ASL by a business or staff function.? The second
is a review of the available toxicity and human health data
followed either by a recommendation for a provisional ASL or a
recommendation for additional information additional
testing, or more complete test'data from another company). An
ASL is provisional, typically for six months.- At the end of this
provisional period, the ASL is reviewed again in light of any new
data, before it is declared to be a final ASL. This review, the
third step, concludes the process. An ASL goes into effect once
it becomes final. ASLs are updated every five years, or sooner
if warranted by new data, by a special subcommittee appointed by
the ASL Committee. If this update indicates new data are
available that might result in a change in the ASL, the chemical
is referred back to the ASL Committee for review.
Note: Material Safety Data Sheets for the chemical or mixtures
containing the chemical must be revised within 90 days of the
provisional ASL being established.
USEPA 15743
1
t?l.3251/
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
EXPOSURE LIMITS (ASL) LIST pRBpAcg
ABLS
AELs are exposure limits for chemicals (or for levels of
physical agents) set by the DuPont ASL Committee. arr: specify
Time-Weighted Average (TWA) airborne concentrations, doses or
biological limits which should not be exceeded, and applicable
time periods.
AELs may be set to prevent health effects from exposures for
full workshifts (8- or 12-hour or to prevent effects from
shorter period exposures such as irritation, narcosis, odor or
nuisance (15-minute TWA). As a general guide, excursions to
which short-period AELs apply should occur no more than four
times per shift and a recovery period of approximately 60 minutes
is required between excursions. In addition, the corresponding
full shift (8- or 12-hour) art. should not be exceeded.
hats are set by the DuPont ASL Committee, which includes
experts in toxicology, industrial hygiene, occupational medicine,
pathology, and epidemiology. AlLs are based on the best
available information from industrial experience, animal studies,
and controlled human studies. They are guidelines based on
informed judgment, and are not fine limits between safe and
dangerous concentrations. -They are not for use as relative
toxicity indexes, limits for continuous uninterrupted exposure,
or proof or disproof of health effects. They should be
interpreted and applied by appropriately qualified personnel.
Specific questions or consequences of occasional excursions above
an ASL should be addressed to the Safety, Health and
Environmental Affairs (SHIA) manager for your business or staff
function. DuPont Engineering Standard provides
guidelines for evaluation of air sampling data.
An AEL is established in three steps. The first step is a
request for an ASL by a business or staff function.? The second
is a review of the available toxicity and human health data
followed either by a recommendation for a provisional ASL or a
recommendation for additional information additional
testing, or more complete test'data from another company). An
ASL is provisional, typically for six months.- At the end of this
provisional period, the ASL is reviewed again in light of any new
data, before it is declared to be a final ASL. This review, the
third step, concludes the process. An ASL goes into effect once
it becomes final. ASLs are updated every five years, or sooner
if warranted by new data, by a special subcommittee appointed by
the ASL Committee. If this update indicates new data are
available that might result in a change in the ASL, the chemical
is referred back to the ASL Committee for review.
Note: Material Safety Data Sheets for the chemical or mixtures
containing the chemical must be revised within 90 days of the
provisional ASL being established.
USEPA 15743
1
a
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
COMMUNITY
A Community Exposure Guideline (CEO) 1; an .xpogur. quid.11n. (r .
established by Haskell Laboratory. The assume. a 24-hour
lifetime exposure by all, including the most sensitive
individuals, in an exposed community population. Exposure above
the C86 will not necessarily result in any adverse effects.
Where data indicates that the C86 may be approached or exceeded,
Haskell, the appropriate business, and Legal will evaluate what
action, if any, should be taken. It is the Company's intent to
maintain exposure below the C86.
CEGs may be recommended for air or water or for both. he
with AELs, CEGs are based on the best available information from
industrial experience, animal toxicity studies, controlled human
exposure studies, and epidemiological findings. However, because
of the variability of sensitivities of members of the community
the infirm, the old, the young, pregnant females, etc.),
versus the healthy worker involved with an AEL, a larger
uncertainty factor needs to be used in extrapolating these data
to a C86.
EMERGENCY EXPOSURE LIMITS (EELS)
EELs are set for emergency situations, such as a pill or
accidental release of a chemical. They specify brief durations
and concentrations from which escape is feasible without any -
escape-impairing or irreversible effects on health. EBLs are
only applicable to emergency situations where occurrence is
expected to be rare in the lifetime of an individual.
OTHER SOURCES OF EXPOSURE LIMITS
ABLs supplement any mandatory regulatory limits developed by
national or local governmental agencies. The more stringent
limit, either that developed by DuPont or by the regulatory
agency, shall apply.
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial hygienists
(ACGIH) annually publishes a booklet containing Threshold Limit
Values (TLVs) for many chemical substances and physical agents.
Also,.the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIRA)
publishes Workplace Environmental Exposure Limits (waste) for I
some chemicals not found in the TLV booklet. ACGIH TLVs and
WEELs should be used as guidelines~for workplace exposures if no.
other more apprOpriate limit exists. If a business or staff
function has some concern about the validity of a TLV or HEEL,
then the ASL Committee should be asked to establish an ABL.
.5.
other compilations of limits American Society of
Testing and Materials and American National Standards
Institute (ANSI) should be used after consultation with your SHEA
Manager and with Haskell Laboratory.
?00000an
I
-2-
a
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
COMMUNITY
A Community Exposure Guideline (CEO) 1; an .xpogur. quid.11n. (r .
established by Haskell Laboratory. The assume. a 24-hour
lifetime exposure by all, including the most sensitive
individuals, in an exposed community population. Exposure above
the C86 will not necessarily result in any adverse effects.
Where data indicates that the C86 may be approached or exceeded,
Haskell, the appropriate business, and Legal will evaluate what
action, if any, should be taken. It is the Company's intent to
maintain exposure below the C86.
CEGs may be recommended for air or water or for both. he
with AELs, CEGs are based on the best available information from
industrial experience, animal toxicity studies, controlled human
exposure studies, and epidemiological findings. However, because
of the variability of sensitivities of members of the community
the infirm, the old, the young, pregnant females, etc.),
versus the healthy worker involved with an AEL, a larger
uncertainty factor needs to be used in extrapolating these data
to a C86.
EMERGENCY EXPOSURE LIMITS (EELS)
EELs are set for emergency situations, such as a pill or
accidental release of a chemical. They specify brief durations
and concentrations from which escape is feasible without any -
escape-impairing or irreversible effects on health. EBLs are
only applicable to emergency situations where occurrence is
expected to be rare in the lifetime of an individual.
OTHER SOURCES OF EXPOSURE LIMITS
ABLs supplement any mandatory regulatory limits developed by
national or local governmental agencies. The more stringent
limit, either that developed by DuPont or by the regulatory
agency, shall apply.
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial hygienists
(ACGIH) annually publishes a booklet containing Threshold Limit
Values (TLVs) for many chemical substances and physical agents.
Also,.the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIRA)
publishes Workplace Environmental Exposure Limits (waste) for I
some chemicals not found in the TLV booklet. ACGIH TLVs and
WEELs should be used as guidelines~for workplace exposures if no.
other more apprOpriate limit exists. If a business or staff
function has some concern about the validity of a TLV or HEEL,
then the ASL Committee should be asked to establish an ABL.
.5.
other compilations of limits American Society of
Testing and Materials and American National Standards
Institute (ANSI) should be used after consultation with your SHEA
Manager and with Haskell Laboratory.
?00000an
I
-2-
ago
P132173
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
HAZARD DETERKINATION
In DuPont, hazard determination is defined in a corporate
policy (1) quoted below:
when toxicologic and/or epidemiologic data indicate that a
chemical might present a carcinogenic, reproductive,
developmental, or germ-cell mutagenic hazard, any business
or staff function which proposes to initiate the hasard
determination procedure shall inform other interested
businessos_and staff functions before issuing a formal
request for such determination. Following receipt of the
request, the Director of Haskell Laboratory and Corporate
Medical shall evaluate the data, and after review by the
Vice President of Safety, Health and Environment shall
discuss their evaluation with the involved businesses
and/or staff functions. This discussion should cover the
extent of knowledge about the hazard associated with the
chemical and should also give an indication about the
potency of the chemical. The Director of Haskell
Laboratory and Corporate Medical will confirm the results
of the discussion by letter to the appropriate SESA
manager(s) or their representative.
Carcinogens. developmental and reproductive toxins, and
germ-cell mutagens are defined as follows:
Carcinogen - A substance or agent with the potential to 3
pro uce or incite cancer. For The Carcinogen Classification
System, a weight of evidence analysis is used with all the i
following factors considered in the evaluation (NOTE: These
factors are net listed with any rank or priority). The
categories included in the carcinogen Classification System
are found on the next page.
Amount of chemical (dose) required to produce the effect
Route of exposure relative to potential human experience
Type of tumor(s), site of tumors, and whether the tumors
are benign or malignant
a Number of animal species affected
Tumor incidence
a Time to tumor formation
a Genotosicity data
0 Mechanistic data
Pharacokinetics and metabolism.
Structure Activity Relationship
Epidemiologic studies
"Guidelines: Control of carcinogenic, Reproductivo,
Developmental. and Germ-Cell Mutagenic Risks Posed by
Chemicals nade or Used within DuPont". BLC Corporate Policy
and Guidelines. IIC (September 1991).
3700000817?
-3-
USEPA15745
ago
P132173
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
HAZARD DETERKINATION
In DuPont, hazard determination is defined in a corporate
policy (1) quoted below:
when toxicologic and/or epidemiologic data indicate that a
chemical might present a carcinogenic, reproductive,
developmental, or germ-cell mutagenic hazard, any business
or staff function which proposes to initiate the hasard
determination procedure shall inform other interested
businessos_and staff functions before issuing a formal
request for such determination. Following receipt of the
request, the Director of Haskell Laboratory and Corporate
Medical shall evaluate the data, and after review by the
Vice President of Safety, Health and Environment shall
discuss their evaluation with the involved businesses
and/or staff functions. This discussion should cover the
extent of knowledge about the hazard associated with the
chemical and should also give an indication about the
potency of the chemical. The Director of Haskell
Laboratory and Corporate Medical will confirm the results
of the discussion by letter to the appropriate SESA
manager(s) or their representative.
Carcinogens. developmental and reproductive toxins, and
germ-cell mutagens are defined as follows:
Carcinogen - A substance or agent with the potential to 3
pro uce or incite cancer. For The Carcinogen Classification
System, a weight of evidence analysis is used with all the i
following factors considered in the evaluation (NOTE: These
factors are net listed with any rank or priority). The
categories included in the carcinogen Classification System
are found on the next page.
Amount of chemical (dose) required to produce the effect
Route of exposure relative to potential human experience
Type of tumor(s), site of tumors, and whether the tumors
are benign or malignant
a Number of animal species affected
Tumor incidence
a Time to tumor formation
a Genotosicity data
0 Mechanistic data
Pharacokinetics and metabolism.
Structure Activity Relationship
Epidemiologic studies
"Guidelines: Control of carcinogenic, Reproductivo,
Developmental. and Germ-Cell Mutagenic Risks Posed by
Chemicals nade or Used within DuPont". BLC Corporate Policy
and Guidelines. IIC (September 1991).
3700000817?
-3-
USEPA15745
P1.3217.4
.
I
son DUPONT US: ONLY .
C-H
(C)
(NC)
mcmocsu cusszucmos srs-rrn
snows sum cancmocsu - .
Substances which are known to be carcinogenic in
hunans. There is sufficient evidence. based on
epideeiology data, to establish a causal association
between exposure.to the substance and the developaent
of cancer.
PROBABLE HUMAN CARCINOGEN (POTENT ANIHAL CARCINOGEN)
b7??
There is sufficient evidence in one or nore adequately v/
conducted studies that the substance is clearly
carcinogenic in experimental aninals.
There are no epideliology data available or the
existing epideaiology data are conflicting or
linited/insufficient to establish a causal association
between human exposure and the development of cancer.
POSSIBLE HUMAN CARCINOGEN (WEAK ANIHAL CARCINOGEN OR
LIMITED EVIDENCE IN ANIHALS)
There is soae or liaited evidence it the substance is,
carcinogenic in experinental animals.
There are no epidemiology data available or the
existing epideaiology data are conflicting or
liaited/insufficient to establish a causal association
between huaan exposure and the development of cancer.
NOT LIKELY TO BE A HUMAN CARCINOGEN (ANIHAL CARCINOGEN
UNLIKELY TO SAVE HUMAN RELEVANCE,
There is sufficient or limited evidence in experimental
animal studies that the substance is carcinogenic at
high dose levels (may have exceeded the HTD), by routes
of administration, in tissues, or by mechanisms that
are not considered relevant to potential hulan
exposure.
NOT CONSIDERED TO BE A CARCINOGENIC HAZARD TO BUHANS
(LACK OF EVIDENCE CARCINOGENICITY)
There is evidence from an adequately conducted?
experimental animal study showing a lack of
carcinogenicity.
If-any epidemiology evidence exists, it supports the
conclusion that there is no known association between
exposure and and increase in cancer risk to huaans.
-4-
soobooarm
USEPA 15746
P1.3217.4
.
I
son DUPONT US: ONLY .
C-H
(C)
(NC)
mcmocsu cusszucmos srs-rrn
snows sum cancmocsu - .
Substances which are known to be carcinogenic in
hunans. There is sufficient evidence. based on
epideeiology data, to establish a causal association
between exposure.to the substance and the developaent
of cancer.
PROBABLE HUMAN CARCINOGEN (POTENT ANIHAL CARCINOGEN)
b7??
There is sufficient evidence in one or nore adequately v/
conducted studies that the substance is clearly
carcinogenic in experimental aninals.
There are no epideliology data available or the
existing epideaiology data are conflicting or
linited/insufficient to establish a causal association
between human exposure and the development of cancer.
POSSIBLE HUMAN CARCINOGEN (WEAK ANIHAL CARCINOGEN OR
LIMITED EVIDENCE IN ANIHALS)
There is soae or liaited evidence it the substance is,
carcinogenic in experinental animals.
There are no epidemiology data available or the
existing epideaiology data are conflicting or
liaited/insufficient to establish a causal association
between huaan exposure and the development of cancer.
NOT LIKELY TO BE A HUMAN CARCINOGEN (ANIHAL CARCINOGEN
UNLIKELY TO SAVE HUMAN RELEVANCE,
There is sufficient or limited evidence in experimental
animal studies that the substance is carcinogenic at
high dose levels (may have exceeded the HTD), by routes
of administration, in tissues, or by mechanisms that
are not considered relevant to potential hulan
exposure.
NOT CONSIDERED TO BE A CARCINOGENIC HAZARD TO BUHANS
(LACK OF EVIDENCE CARCINOGENICITY)
There is evidence from an adequately conducted?
experimental animal study showing a lack of
carcinogenicity.
If-any epidemiology evidence exists, it supports the
conclusion that there is no known association between
exposure and and increase in cancer risk to huaans.
-4-
soobooarm
USEPA 15746
Develo mental Toxin - An agent with the potential to
interfere with the development 0! an individual while in
utero or after birth.
Potency is determined by the Developmental aasard Index
(081) which is the ratio or the minimum dose?toxic to the
mother and the minimum dose toxic to the conceptus.
Substances or agents with bars of greater than are
considered potent and are identitied on the ASL List by a
capital letter 3 to 5 indicate a less potent
substance or agent and are identitied on the AIL List by a
small letter d; substances or agents with a but of less than
3 are not considered developmental toxins and are identified
on the ASL List by a in parentheses, (D).
Re roductive Toxin - An agent with the potential to attect
adversely the reproductive process of adult males and/or'
females.
Potency is determined as follows:
Reproductive toxicity occurred at a dose level
considerably below that resulting in other signs or
toxicity. These substances or agents are considered
potent and are indicated on the ASL List by a capital
letter R. male or :emal' will also be indicated it
reproductive toxicity occurred only in one sex.
Reproductive toxicity occurred at a dose level at or just
below that resulting in other signs of toxicity. These
substances or agents are considered less potent and are
identified on the ABL List by a small letter r. hale or
female will also be indicated it reproductive toxicity
occurred only in one sex.
If reproductive toxicity occurred, but only at a dose
level considerably greater than that resulting in other
signs of texicity, these substances or agents are not
considered reproductive toxins and are identitied on the
ASL List by an a in parentheses. (R).
USEPA 15747
Develo mental Toxin - An agent with the potential to
interfere with the development 0! an individual while in
utero or after birth.
Potency is determined by the Developmental aasard Index
(081) which is the ratio or the minimum dose?toxic to the
mother and the minimum dose toxic to the conceptus.
Substances or agents with bars of greater than are
considered potent and are identitied on the ASL List by a
capital letter 3 to 5 indicate a less potent
substance or agent and are identitied on the AIL List by a
small letter d; substances or agents with a but of less than
3 are not considered developmental toxins and are identified
on the ASL List by a in parentheses, (D).
Re roductive Toxin - An agent with the potential to attect
adversely the reproductive process of adult males and/or'
females.
Potency is determined as follows:
Reproductive toxicity occurred at a dose level
considerably below that resulting in other signs or
toxicity. These substances or agents are considered
potent and are indicated on the ASL List by a capital
letter R. male or :emal' will also be indicated it
reproductive toxicity occurred only in one sex.
Reproductive toxicity occurred at a dose level at or just
below that resulting in other signs of toxicity. These
substances or agents are considered less potent and are
identified on the ABL List by a small letter r. hale or
female will also be indicated it reproductive toxicity
occurred only in one sex.
If reproductive toxicity occurred, but only at a dose
level considerably greater than that resulting in other
signs of texicity, these substances or agents are not
considered reproductive toxins and are identitied on the
ASL List by an a in parentheses. (R).
USEPA 15747
P1.3217.6
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
Germ-Cell Mutagen - A genotoxic agent uith the potential to .
cause permanent heritable damage in germ (reproductive) cells
of expesed individuals. A substance is identified as a
mutagen if it is:
A proven human germ?cell mutagen, I
Pesitive in a mammalian in vivo germ-cell assay tor gene
mutatiens er chromosome aberrations. or
Pesitive in'a mammalian in vivo somatic (non-reproductive)
cell assay (or gene mutations or chromosome aberrations,
and, in addition. the substance is either positive in a
mammalian In vIvo germ?cell assay tor DNA damage and
repair, gEfTs Identified en the AIL List as a reproductive
toxin.
In evaluating experimental studies in mammals, the tollewing
factors are considered:
The experimental design and reute of administratien.
The dose required to preduce genotoxicity.
The magnitude e: the genotexic respense and the presence
.0: a dose-response relationship.
The general cencerdance e: positive findings among
different germ-cell genetoxicity assays (it known).
The genetic endpeint assessed (gene mutations, chremesome
aberrations, DNA repair).
Petent mutagens are identified on the AIL List by a capital
letter whereas less potent mutagens receive a small letter
m. Agents not censidered to be mutagens are identified by a
capital letter a in parentheses,
Potent germ-cell mutagen categorizatien is primarily
applied te:
Proven human germ-cell mutagens, or
Experimental mammalian germ-cell mutagens with a strong
evidence e2 causing genotoxic damage in humans.
In general, validated germ-cell mutagens in experimental
mammals receive a small letter I.
Although genotoxic agents also affect somatic (non-
reproductive) cells, the guidelines described here address
only genetic damage to germ cells. Genotoxic effects on
somatic cells are usually addressed in carcinogen hasard
determinations (see page 3).
.6-
LMXWOHDM
USEPA l5748
P1.3217.6
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
Germ-Cell Mutagen - A genotoxic agent uith the potential to .
cause permanent heritable damage in germ (reproductive) cells
of expesed individuals. A substance is identified as a
mutagen if it is:
A proven human germ?cell mutagen, I
Pesitive in a mammalian in vivo germ-cell assay tor gene
mutatiens er chromosome aberrations. or
Pesitive in'a mammalian in vivo somatic (non-reproductive)
cell assay (or gene mutations or chromosome aberrations,
and, in addition. the substance is either positive in a
mammalian In vIvo germ?cell assay tor DNA damage and
repair, gEfTs Identified en the AIL List as a reproductive
toxin.
In evaluating experimental studies in mammals, the tollewing
factors are considered:
The experimental design and reute of administratien.
The dose required to preduce genotoxicity.
The magnitude e: the genotexic respense and the presence
.0: a dose-response relationship.
The general cencerdance e: positive findings among
different germ-cell genetoxicity assays (it known).
The genetic endpeint assessed (gene mutations, chremesome
aberrations, DNA repair).
Petent mutagens are identified on the AIL List by a capital
letter whereas less potent mutagens receive a small letter
m. Agents not censidered to be mutagens are identified by a
capital letter a in parentheses,
Potent germ-cell mutagen categorizatien is primarily
applied te:
Proven human germ-cell mutagens, or
Experimental mammalian germ-cell mutagens with a strong
evidence e2 causing genotoxic damage in humans.
In general, validated germ-cell mutagens in experimental
mammals receive a small letter I.
Although genotoxic agents also affect somatic (non-
reproductive) cells, the guidelines described here address
only genetic damage to germ cells. Genotoxic effects on
somatic cells are usually addressed in carcinogen hasard
determinations (see page 3).
.6-
LMXWOHDM
USEPA l5748
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
P1321720
ABL LIST
mn/ -
CHEMICAL ABL REMARKS STATUS 3L8 GUIDELINES
tChlorinuron Ethyl 10 ng/I3 8- and 12-hour TVA. 1992
(Used in Classic? totnl dust
Herbicide) 5 ugluk 8- and 12-hour TVA,
(DPX-P6025) dust
[90982-32-4]
tChlorine 0.5 8- and 12-hour WA 91994
[7782-50-5] 1 15-Iinuto TVA
n-Chloroanilino 0.5 pp: 8- :nd 12-h0ur TVA, 1988
[108-42-9] skin
o-Chloroanilino 2 8- and 12-hour TVA, 1988
'[95-51-2] skin
p-Chloroanilinc 0.5 ugll? 8-hour TVA, skin 1988 1988
[106-47~8] 0.3 Isl-3 12-hour TVA, skin (R 1988)*
TChlorobenzeno 23 8- and 12-hour um 1986 (no 1986,)9
[108-90-7] (D 1986)*
1-Chloro-1.1-dit1uorocthunc Sec
SQ. ECPC-ZZ
So. 8870-31
tChloroform 2 pp. 8- and 12-hour TVA 1993 1993
[67-66-31 (D 1993)*
(R 1993)*
(H 1993)*
0.1 13/33 8- 9nd 12-hour TVA 1991
[2682-20?4] Iixturc with
[26172-55-4]
(Kathono
chloroptcno 10 8- and 12-hour TVA 1988
[126-99-8l
1 1
fluoroothanc
SO.
Substances or agonts rovicvcd recording to 31? Guidelines and not
considcrod to be a carcinogenic, dovelopnontal. roproductivo, or torn-c011
mutagonic hazard are indicatod by the appropriate lotto: vithin
parenthasos. 0.3., (NC), (D), (R), or (H).
June 17, 1994
-10-
USEPA 15762
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
P1321720
ABL LIST
mn/ -
CHEMICAL ABL REMARKS STATUS 3L8 GUIDELINES
tChlorinuron Ethyl 10 ng/I3 8- and 12-hour TVA. 1992
(Used in Classic? totnl dust
Herbicide) 5 ugluk 8- and 12-hour TVA,
(DPX-P6025) dust
[90982-32-4]
tChlorine 0.5 8- and 12-hour WA 91994
[7782-50-5] 1 15-Iinuto TVA
n-Chloroanilino 0.5 pp: 8- :nd 12-h0ur TVA, 1988
[108-42-9] skin
o-Chloroanilino 2 8- and 12-hour TVA, 1988
'[95-51-2] skin
p-Chloroanilinc 0.5 ugll? 8-hour TVA, skin 1988 1988
[106-47~8] 0.3 Isl-3 12-hour TVA, skin (R 1988)*
TChlorobenzeno 23 8- and 12-hour um 1986 (no 1986,)9
[108-90-7] (D 1986)*
1-Chloro-1.1-dit1uorocthunc Sec
SQ. ECPC-ZZ
So. 8870-31
tChloroform 2 pp. 8- and 12-hour TVA 1993 1993
[67-66-31 (D 1993)*
(R 1993)*
(H 1993)*
0.1 13/33 8- 9nd 12-hour TVA 1991
[2682-20?4] Iixturc with
[26172-55-4]
(Kathono
chloroptcno 10 8- and 12-hour TVA 1988
[126-99-8l
1 1
fluoroothanc
SO.
Substances or agonts rovicvcd recording to 31? Guidelines and not
considcrod to be a carcinogenic, dovelopnontal. roproductivo, or torn-c011
mutagonic hazard are indicatod by the appropriate lotto: vithin
parenthasos. 0.3., (NC), (D), (R), or (H).
June 17, 1994
-10-
USEPA 15762
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
CHEMICAL
Ammonia
Carbon Honoxidc
Chlorine
Chloroprene
Chlorosulfonic
Acid
1,A-Dichloro-
butane-2
fN,N-Dimethyl-
aniline
Dinothyl Sulfate
Fluorobenzenq
Fluorosulfonic
Acid
Formald?hydn
Halon 2402
BCFC-31
Hexafluo:o-
propylene
June 17, 1994
EMERGENCY EXPOSURB LIMITS
BBL
500
300 pppp.
2000 ppm-min
20 lag/II1
10 ng/IJ
120 ppm-min
400 pp-
100 pp-
30 ppm-Iinutcs
2000
1000 pp-
10 nzll?
5 Isl-3
10 pp.
500
2500?-
1000 pp-
1000 pp-
6000 ppm-sin
TIER PERIOD
mum
10 linutcs 500 pp. .
10-60 minutes
10 ninutns 900
10-60 minutes
1 ninuto 10 pp.
1-5 linutcs
5-60 Ilnutes
60 linutcs 2000 pp-
15 minute: 20 .3133
15-60 minutes
60 minutes 2
10 minute 600 ppn'
11-60 ninutes
60 nxnutcs 2 ppn'
1 ninutn 2000 pp:
2-60 ninutcs A
15 ninutca 10
15-60 ninutcs
60-n1nutcs 10 pp-
15 ninuto: 500 pp-
1-I1nutc 2500
2-60 linutes
2-60 ninutes 2500 pp-
60 ninutcs 1000 pp-
- 55 -
P1321766
90000151?
USEPA [5808
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
CHEMICAL
Ammonia
Carbon Honoxidc
Chlorine
Chloroprene
Chlorosulfonic
Acid
1,A-Dichloro-
butane-2
fN,N-Dimethyl-
aniline
Dinothyl Sulfate
Fluorobenzenq
Fluorosulfonic
Acid
Formald?hydn
Halon 2402
BCFC-31
Hexafluo:o-
propylene
June 17, 1994
EMERGENCY EXPOSURB LIMITS
BBL
500
300 pppp.
2000 ppm-min
20 lag/II1
10 ng/IJ
120 ppm-min
400 pp-
100 pp-
30 ppm-Iinutcs
2000
1000 pp-
10 nzll?
5 Isl-3
10 pp.
500
2500?-
1000 pp-
1000 pp-
6000 ppm-sin
TIER PERIOD
mum
10 linutcs 500 pp. .
10-60 minutes
10 ninutns 900
10-60 minutes
1 ninuto 10 pp.
1-5 linutcs
5-60 Ilnutes
60 linutcs 2000 pp-
15 minute: 20 .3133
15-60 minutes
60 minutes 2
10 minute 600 ppn'
11-60 ninutes
60 nxnutcs 2 ppn'
1 ninutn 2000 pp:
2-60 ninutcs A
15 ninutca 10
15-60 ninutcs
60-n1nutcs 10 pp-
15 ninuto: 500 pp-
1-I1nutc 2500
2-60 linutes
2-60 ninutes 2500 pp-
60 ninutcs 1000 pp-
- 55 -
P1321766
90000151?
USEPA [5808
?1
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
P1.3217.69
COMMUNITY EXPOSURB GUIDELINES
Airborne Guidelines
CHEMICAL
Acetic Acid
Acrylonitrile
Ammonium Periluorooctanoate
.Benzene
1,3-Butadiene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Carbonyl Sulfide
Chlorine
Chloroform
Chloroprene
Dibromomethane
Dimethylacetemide
1,4-Dioxane
Dodecenedioic Acid
Bthanolamine
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dichloride
FC-116 (Rexafluoroethane)
Formaldehyde
1,4-Hexadiene
n-Hexane
RFC-23 (Tritluoromethane)
RFC-125 (Pentafluoroethane)
.Bydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Cyanide
Hydrogen Fluoride
Haleic
Hethyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Nitrogen Dioxide
June 17. 1994
E25
1 6015)
20
0.0003 "In,
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.2 I
0.05
0.2
0.5
1
0.4
1
0.5 mg/m? (total duet0.1
0.01
2
10 pp-
10
0.2 (60-minute TVA) in?
combinetion with the
Rational Ambient Air
Quality Stenderd of
100 ug/m3 (0.053 ppm) -
Annual arithmetic mean
59 -
USEPA 1581]
?1
FOR DUPONT USE ONLY
P1.3217.69
COMMUNITY EXPOSURB GUIDELINES
Airborne Guidelines
CHEMICAL
Acetic Acid
Acrylonitrile
Ammonium Periluorooctanoate
.Benzene
1,3-Butadiene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Carbonyl Sulfide
Chlorine
Chloroform
Chloroprene
Dibromomethane
Dimethylacetemide
1,4-Dioxane
Dodecenedioic Acid
Bthanolamine
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dichloride
FC-116 (Rexafluoroethane)
Formaldehyde
1,4-Hexadiene
n-Hexane
RFC-23 (Tritluoromethane)
RFC-125 (Pentafluoroethane)
.Bydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Cyanide
Hydrogen Fluoride
Haleic
Hethyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Nitrogen Dioxide
June 17. 1994
E25
1 6015)
20
0.0003 "In,
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.2 I
0.05
0.2
0.5
1
0.4
1
0.5 mg/m? (total duet0.1
0.01
2
10 pp-
10
0.2 (60-minute TVA) in?
combinetion with the
Rational Ambient Air
Quality Stenderd of
100 ug/m3 (0.053 ppm) -
Annual arithmetic mean
59 -
USEPA 1581]