Documents
Court Filing Containing Prison Guard Email About Failure to Contain Coronavirus
Apr. 10, 2020
Case 7:13-cr-00353-KMK Document 90 Filed 04/09/20 Page 1 of 3
Federal Defenders
OF N E W YO RK , I NC .
Southern District
52 Duane Street - 10th Floor, New York, NY 10007
Tel: (2 12) 417-8700 Fax : (212) 571--0392
Sowcl,rmDucric,of N.,., Yorlc
Dc11'id£ . Pa11011
£x""'1iu , Direcror
Jnwifcr
I~. Brmnt
Aaomey, m,O,a,g,,
a nd .-lllfH"1
1e1·- i11-Cl uef
April 9, 2020
BY ECF AND EMAIL
Honorable Kenneth M. Karas
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re:
United States v. Rabadi
13 Cr. 353 (KMK)
Dear Judge Karas:
We write to briefly supplement our reply, filed this morning, based on
factual information we just received from correctional staff at the MDC that
directly contradicts information provided by the BOP to the government, and
relied on by the government in opposing Mr. Rabadi’s compassionate release,
with respect to the measures being taken by the BOP to control the spread of
COVID-19 within the facility. Specifically, we learned that the VicePresident of the Union that represents correctional staff at the MDC sent the
below email to the Warden of the MDC this morning:
------------------------------------------------Good morning,
The Preamble states that we recognize that the employees are the most valuable resource of the
agency.
It has come to the Union's attention that management has shown that inmates are the most
valuable asset to the Bureau. Can we please address the following concerns:
Why are staff not quarantined who have been in direct contact with inmates who have tested
positive or were symptomatic? Meanwhile, you are quarantining an entire unit, and not saying a
word to those staff members left behind.
When will we show staff that we care about them? You only gave us 2 surgical masks to enter the
building for protection, one more mask than you gave the inmates to reuse weekly.
Why do we have 2 inmates who tested positive on regular housing units? J-73 and G-43. These
inmates were released to general population even before 7days of quarantine. Why aren't those
Case 7:13-cr-00353-KMK Document 90 Filed 04/09/20 Page 1 of 3
Federal Defenders
OF N E W YO RK , I NC .
Southern District
52 Duane Street - 10th Floor, New York, NY 10007
Tel: (2 12) 417-8700 Fax : (212) 571--0392
Sowcl,rmDucric,of N.,., Yorlc
Dc11'id£ . Pa11011
£x""'1iu , Direcror
Jnwifcr
I~. Brmnt
Aaomey, m,O,a,g,,
a nd .-lllfH"1
1e1·- i11-Cl uef
April 9, 2020
BY ECF AND EMAIL
Honorable Kenneth M. Karas
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re:
United States v. Rabadi
13 Cr. 353 (KMK)
Dear Judge Karas:
We write to briefly supplement our reply, filed this morning, based on
factual information we just received from correctional staff at the MDC that
directly contradicts information provided by the BOP to the government, and
relied on by the government in opposing Mr. Rabadi’s compassionate release,
with respect to the measures being taken by the BOP to control the spread of
COVID-19 within the facility. Specifically, we learned that the VicePresident of the Union that represents correctional staff at the MDC sent the
below email to the Warden of the MDC this morning:
------------------------------------------------Good morning,
The Preamble states that we recognize that the employees are the most valuable resource of the
agency.
It has come to the Union's attention that management has shown that inmates are the most
valuable asset to the Bureau. Can we please address the following concerns:
Why are staff not quarantined who have been in direct contact with inmates who have tested
positive or were symptomatic? Meanwhile, you are quarantining an entire unit, and not saying a
word to those staff members left behind.
When will we show staff that we care about them? You only gave us 2 surgical masks to enter the
building for protection, one more mask than you gave the inmates to reuse weekly.
Why do we have 2 inmates who tested positive on regular housing units? J-73 and G-43. These
inmates were released to general population even before 7days of quarantine. Why aren't those
Case 7:13-cr-00353-KMK Document 90 Filed 04/09/20 Page 2 of 3
Honorable Kenneth M. Karas
United States District Judge
April 8, 2020
Page 2
housing units on quarantine with appropriate PPE for staff? if a staff member gets sick or even
dies from the COVID19 virus in one of these units it's now noted that you were well aware. We are
asking for N-95's on those units and for all staff entering these housing units.
Once staff test positive why haven't we informed all staff who have been in direct contact with
those individuals? Why are they not quarantined? Why are we not appropriately informing the
staff?
Rhonda Barnwell,
A.F.G.E Local 2005 - Deputy Chief
U.S. Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Metropolitan Detention Center
80 29th Street Brooklyn, NY 11232
------------------------------------------------The BOP has repeatedly asserted in litigation in the Southern and
Eastern Districts of New York that it is containing the spread of coronavirus
by keeping positive and symptomatic inmates on isolation (Gov’t Opp. at 1718; April 9 Letter to Chief Judge Mauskopf, pursuant to Administrative
Order No. 2020-14, from Warden Edge and Warden Licon-Vitale, attached as
Ex. A), but the Union, whose members are required to work inside the facility
every day, states that two inmates who have tested positive were returned to
regular housing units after less than 7 days, that those units are not now
quarantined, and staff on those units have not been given appropriate
personal protective gear. The Union also raises the clear problem of exposed
staff not being quarantined, but rather, continuing to work on the units, and
of staff members not being informed when other staff members whom they
were in contact with have tested positive.
These assertions by the Union call the credibility of the BOP’s
representations about the practices at MDC Brooklyn into serious question
and further speak to the risk to all the inmates from such practices that are
contrary to the CDC’s advice, and in particular the risk to vulnerable inmates
such as Mr. Rabadi.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/
Sylvie J. Levine
Deirdre D. von Dornum
Federal Defenders of New York
Case 7:13-cr-00353-KMK Document 90 Filed 04/09/20 Page 2 of 3
Honorable Kenneth M. Karas
United States District Judge
April 8, 2020
Page 2
housing units on quarantine with appropriate PPE for staff? if a staff member gets sick or even
dies from the COVID19 virus in one of these units it's now noted that you were well aware. We are
asking for N-95's on those units and for all staff entering these housing units.
Once staff test positive why haven't we informed all staff who have been in direct contact with
those individuals? Why are they not quarantined? Why are we not appropriately informing the
staff?
Rhonda Barnwell,
A.F.G.E Local 2005 - Deputy Chief
U.S. Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Metropolitan Detention Center
80 29th Street Brooklyn, NY 11232
------------------------------------------------The BOP has repeatedly asserted in litigation in the Southern and
Eastern Districts of New York that it is containing the spread of coronavirus
by keeping positive and symptomatic inmates on isolation (Gov’t Opp. at 1718; April 9 Letter to Chief Judge Mauskopf, pursuant to Administrative
Order No. 2020-14, from Warden Edge and Warden Licon-Vitale, attached as
Ex. A), but the Union, whose members are required to work inside the facility
every day, states that two inmates who have tested positive were returned to
regular housing units after less than 7 days, that those units are not now
quarantined, and staff on those units have not been given appropriate
personal protective gear. The Union also raises the clear problem of exposed
staff not being quarantined, but rather, continuing to work on the units, and
of staff members not being informed when other staff members whom they
were in contact with have tested positive.
These assertions by the Union call the credibility of the BOP’s
representations about the practices at MDC Brooklyn into serious question
and further speak to the risk to all the inmates from such practices that are
contrary to the CDC’s advice, and in particular the risk to vulnerable inmates
such as Mr. Rabadi.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/
Sylvie J. Levine
Deirdre D. von Dornum
Federal Defenders of New York
Case 7:13-cr-00353-KMK Document 90 Filed 04/09/20 Page 3 of 3
Honorable Kenneth M. Karas
United States District Judge
CC:
AUSA Daniel Richenthal
AUSA Margery Feinzig
Chief U.S. Probation Officer Michael Fitzpatrick
Albert Dayan, Esq.
April 8, 2020
Page 3
Case 7:13-cr-00353-KMK Document 90 Filed 04/09/20 Page 3 of 3
Honorable Kenneth M. Karas
United States District Judge
CC:
AUSA Daniel Richenthal
AUSA Margery Feinzig
Chief U.S. Probation Officer Michael Fitzpatrick
Albert Dayan, Esq.
April 8, 2020
Page 3