Documents
DIOG Profiling Rules 2016
Jan. 31, 2017
4.3.3
(U) G UIDANCE ON THE U SE OF R ACE, E THNICITY, G ENDER, N ATIONAL
O RIGIN, R ELIGION, S EXUAL O RIENTATION, OR G ENDER IDENTITY IN
A SSESSMENTS AND P REDICATED INVESTIGATIONS
(U) Considering the reality of common ethnicity, race, religion, or national origin among many
criminal and terrorist groups, some question how the prohibition against racial or ethnic
profiling is to be effectively applied—and not violated—in FBI Assessments and Predicated
Investigations. The question arises generally in two contexts: (i) with respect to an individual or
a group of individuals; and (ii) with respect to ethnic or racial communities as a whole.
4.3.3.1
(U) INDIVIDUAL R ACE , E THNICITY , G ENDER , N ATIONAL O RIGIN , R ELIGION ,
S EXUAL O RIENTATION , OR G ENDER IDENTITY AS A F ACTOR
(U) The DOJ 's 2014 Guidance on Use of Race, etc. permits the consideration of race,
ethnicity, gender, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity information
based on specific reporting—such as from an eyewitness. As a general rule, race, ethnicity,
gender, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity as an identifying
feature of a suspected perpetrator, subject, and in some cases, a victim, is relevant if it is
based on reliable evidence or information—not conjecture or stereotyped assumptions. In
addition, the DOJ's 2014 Guidance on Use of Race, etc. permits consideration of such
personal characteristics in other investigative or collection scenarios if it is relevant to an
identified criminal incident, scheme, or organization. These examples illustrate:
A) (U) The race or ethnicity of suspected members, associates, or supporters of an ethnic-based
gang or criminal enterprise may be collected and retained when gathering information about or
investigating the organization.
B) (U) Ethnicity may be considered in evaluating whether a subject is—or is not—a possible
associate of a criminal or terrorist group that is known to be comprised of members of the
same ethnic grouping—as long as it is not the dominant factor for focusing on a particular
4-13
UNCLASSIFIED – FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Version Dated:
March 3, 2016
4.3.3
(U) G UIDANCE ON THE U SE OF R ACE, E THNICITY, G ENDER, N ATIONAL
O RIGIN, R ELIGION, S EXUAL O RIENTATION, OR G ENDER IDENTITY IN
A SSESSMENTS AND P REDICATED INVESTIGATIONS
(U) Considering the reality of common ethnicity, race, religion, or national origin among many
criminal and terrorist groups, some question how the prohibition against racial or ethnic
profiling is to be effectively applied—and not violated—in FBI Assessments and Predicated
Investigations. The question arises generally in two contexts: (i) with respect to an individual or
a group of individuals; and (ii) with respect to ethnic or racial communities as a whole.
4.3.3.1
(U) INDIVIDUAL R ACE , E THNICITY , G ENDER , N ATIONAL O RIGIN , R ELIGION ,
S EXUAL O RIENTATION , OR G ENDER IDENTITY AS A F ACTOR
(U) The DOJ 's 2014 Guidance on Use of Race, etc. permits the consideration of race,
ethnicity, gender, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity information
based on specific reporting—such as from an eyewitness. As a general rule, race, ethnicity,
gender, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity as an identifying
feature of a suspected perpetrator, subject, and in some cases, a victim, is relevant if it is
based on reliable evidence or information—not conjecture or stereotyped assumptions. In
addition, the DOJ's 2014 Guidance on Use of Race, etc. permits consideration of such
personal characteristics in other investigative or collection scenarios if it is relevant to an
identified criminal incident, scheme, or organization. These examples illustrate:
A) (U) The race or ethnicity of suspected members, associates, or supporters of an ethnic-based
gang or criminal enterprise may be collected and retained when gathering information about or
investigating the organization.
B) (U) Ethnicity may be considered in evaluating whether a subject is—or is not—a possible
associate of a criminal or terrorist group that is known to be comprised of members of the
same ethnic grouping—as long as it is not the dominant factor for focusing on a particular
4-13
UNCLASSIFIED – FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Version Dated:
March 3, 2016
UNCLASSIFIED – FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide
§4
person. It is axiomatic that there are many members of the same ethnic group who are not
members of the criminal or terrorist group; for that reason, there must be other information
beyond race or ethnicity that links the individual to the terrorist or criminal group or to the
other members of the group. Otherwise, racial or ethnic identity would be the sole criterion,
and that is impermissible.
4.3.3.2
(U) C OMMUNITY R ACE , E THNICITY , G ENDER , N ATIONAL O RIGIN , R ELIGION ,
S EXUAL O RIENTATION , OR G ENDER IDENTITY AS A F ACTOR
4.3.3.2.1
(U) C OLLECTING AND A NALYZING D EMOGRAPHICS
(U) The DOJ's 2014 Guidance on Use of Race, etc. and FBI policy permit the FBI to identify
locations of concentrated ethnic communities in the field office's domain, if these locations
will reasonably aid the analysis of potential threats and vulnerabilities to national and
homeland security or an authorized intelligence activity, e.g., assist domain awareness for the
purpose of performing intelligence analysis. If, for example, intelligence reporting reveals that
members of certain terrorist organizations live and operate primarily within a certain
concentrated community of the same ethnicity, the location of that community is clearly
valuable—and properly collectible—data. Similarly, the locations of ethnic-oriented
businesses and other facilities may be collected if their locations will reasonably contribute to
an awareness of potential threats and vulnerabilities, and intelligence collection opportunities.
Also, members of some communities may be potential victims of civil rights crimes and, for
this reason, community location may aid enforcement of civil rights laws. Information about
such communities should not be collected, however, unless the communities are sufficiently
concentrated and established so as to provide a reasonable potential for intelligence collection
that would support FBI mission programs (e.g., where identified terrorist subjects from certain
countries may relocate to blend in and avoid detection).
4.3.3.2.2
(U) G EO -M APPING E THNIC /R ACIAL D EMOGRAPHICS
(U) As a general rule, if information about community demographics may be collected, it may
be "'mapped." Sophisticated computer geo-mapping technology visually depicts lawfully
collected information and can assist in showing relationships among disparate data. By itself,
mapping raises no separate concerns about racial or ethnic profiling, assuming the underlying
information that is mapped was properly collected. It may be used broadly - e.g., for domain
awareness of all relevant demographics .in the field office's area of responsibility or to track
crime trends — or narrowly to identify specific communities or areas of interest to inform a
specific Assessment or investigation. In each case, the relevance of the ethnic or racial
information mapped to the authorized purpose of the Assessment or investigation must be
clearly demonstrated and documented.
4.3.3.2.3
(U) G ENERAL E THNIC /R ACIAL B EHAVIOR
(U) The authority to collect ethnic community location information does not extend to the
collection of cultural and behavioral information about an ethnic community that bears no
rational relationship to a valid investigative or analytical need. Every ethnic community in the
Nation that has been associated with a criminal or national security threat has a dominant
majority of law-abiding citizens, resident aliens, and visitors who may share common ethnic
behavior but who have no connection to crime or terrorism (as either subjects or victims). For
this reason, a broad-brush collection of racial or ethnic characteristics or behavior is not
4-14
UNCLASSIFIED – FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Version Dated:
March 3, 2016
UNCLASSIFIED – FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide
§4
person. It is axiomatic that there are many members of the same ethnic group who are not
members of the criminal or terrorist group; for that reason, there must be other information
beyond race or ethnicity that links the individual to the terrorist or criminal group or to the
other members of the group. Otherwise, racial or ethnic identity would be the sole criterion,
and that is impermissible.
4.3.3.2
(U) C OMMUNITY R ACE , E THNICITY , G ENDER , N ATIONAL O RIGIN , R ELIGION ,
S EXUAL O RIENTATION , OR G ENDER IDENTITY AS A F ACTOR
4.3.3.2.1
(U) C OLLECTING AND A NALYZING D EMOGRAPHICS
(U) The DOJ's 2014 Guidance on Use of Race, etc. and FBI policy permit the FBI to identify
locations of concentrated ethnic communities in the field office's domain, if these locations
will reasonably aid the analysis of potential threats and vulnerabilities to national and
homeland security or an authorized intelligence activity, e.g., assist domain awareness for the
purpose of performing intelligence analysis. If, for example, intelligence reporting reveals that
members of certain terrorist organizations live and operate primarily within a certain
concentrated community of the same ethnicity, the location of that community is clearly
valuable—and properly collectible—data. Similarly, the locations of ethnic-oriented
businesses and other facilities may be collected if their locations will reasonably contribute to
an awareness of potential threats and vulnerabilities, and intelligence collection opportunities.
Also, members of some communities may be potential victims of civil rights crimes and, for
this reason, community location may aid enforcement of civil rights laws. Information about
such communities should not be collected, however, unless the communities are sufficiently
concentrated and established so as to provide a reasonable potential for intelligence collection
that would support FBI mission programs (e.g., where identified terrorist subjects from certain
countries may relocate to blend in and avoid detection).
4.3.3.2.2
(U) G EO -M APPING E THNIC /R ACIAL D EMOGRAPHICS
(U) As a general rule, if information about community demographics may be collected, it may
be "'mapped." Sophisticated computer geo-mapping technology visually depicts lawfully
collected information and can assist in showing relationships among disparate data. By itself,
mapping raises no separate concerns about racial or ethnic profiling, assuming the underlying
information that is mapped was properly collected. It may be used broadly - e.g., for domain
awareness of all relevant demographics .in the field office's area of responsibility or to track
crime trends — or narrowly to identify specific communities or areas of interest to inform a
specific Assessment or investigation. In each case, the relevance of the ethnic or racial
information mapped to the authorized purpose of the Assessment or investigation must be
clearly demonstrated and documented.
4.3.3.2.3
(U) G ENERAL E THNIC /R ACIAL B EHAVIOR
(U) The authority to collect ethnic community location information does not extend to the
collection of cultural and behavioral information about an ethnic community that bears no
rational relationship to a valid investigative or analytical need. Every ethnic community in the
Nation that has been associated with a criminal or national security threat has a dominant
majority of law-abiding citizens, resident aliens, and visitors who may share common ethnic
behavior but who have no connection to crime or terrorism (as either subjects or victims). For
this reason, a broad-brush collection of racial or ethnic characteristics or behavior is not
4-14
UNCLASSIFIED – FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Version Dated:
March 3, 2016
UNCLASSIFIED -FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide
§4
helpful to achieve any authorized FBI purpose and may create the appearance of improper
racial or ethnic profiling.
4.3.3.2.4
(U) S PECIFIC AND R ELEVANT E THNIC B EHAVIOR
(U) On the other hand, knowing the behavioral and life style characteristics of known
individuals who are criminals or who pose a threat to national security may logically aid in
the detection and prevention of crime and threats to the national security within the
community and beyond. Focused behavioral characteristics reasonably believed to be
associated with a particular criminal or terrorist element of an ethnic community (not with the
community as a whole) may be collected and retained. For example, if it is known through
intelligence analysis or otherwise that individuals associated with an ethnic-based terrorist or
criminal group conduct their finances by certain methods, travel in a certain manner, work in
certain jobs, or come from a certain part of their home country that has established links to
terrorism, those are relevant factors to consider when investigating the group or assessing
whether it may have a presence within a community. It is recognized that the “fit” between
specific behavioral characteristics and a terrorist or criminal group is unlikely to be perfect—
that is, there will be members of the group who do not exhibit the behavioral criteria as well
as persons who exhibit the behaviors who are not members of the group. Nevertheless, in
order to maximize FBI mission relevance and to minimize the appearance of racial or ethnic
profiling, the criteria used to identify members of the group within the larger ethnic
community to which they belong must be as focused and as narrow as intelligence reporting
and other circumstances permit. If intelligence reporting is insufficiently exact so that it is
reasonable to believe that the criteria will include an unreasonable number of people who are
not involved, then it would be inappropriate to use the behaviors, standing alone, as the basis
for FBI activity.
4.3.3.2.5
(U) E XPLOITIVE E THNIC B EHAVIOR
(U) A related category of information that can be collected is behavioral and cultural
information about ethnic or racial communities that is reasonably likely to be exploited by
criminal or terrorist groups who hide within those communities in order to engage in illicit
activities undetected. For example, the existence of a cultural tradition of collecting funds
from members within the community to fund charitable causes in their homeland at a certain
time of the year (and how that is accomplished) would be relevant if intelligence reporting
revealed that, unknown to many donors, the charitable causes were fronts for terrorist
organizations or that terrorist supporters within the community intended to exploit the
unwitting donors for their own purposes.
UNCLASSIFIED -FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide
§4
helpful to achieve any authorized FBI purpose and may create the appearance of improper
racial or ethnic profiling.
4.3.3.2.4
(U) S PECIFIC AND R ELEVANT E THNIC B EHAVIOR
(U) On the other hand, knowing the behavioral and life style characteristics of known
individuals who are criminals or who pose a threat to national security may logically aid in
the detection and prevention of crime and threats to the national security within the
community and beyond. Focused behavioral characteristics reasonably believed to be
associated with a particular criminal or terrorist element of an ethnic community (not with the
community as a whole) may be collected and retained. For example, if it is known through
intelligence analysis or otherwise that individuals associated with an ethnic-based terrorist or
criminal group conduct their finances by certain methods, travel in a certain manner, work in
certain jobs, or come from a certain part of their home country that has established links to
terrorism, those are relevant factors to consider when investigating the group or assessing
whether it may have a presence within a community. It is recognized that the “fit” between
specific behavioral characteristics and a terrorist or criminal group is unlikely to be perfect—
that is, there will be members of the group who do not exhibit the behavioral criteria as well
as persons who exhibit the behaviors who are not members of the group. Nevertheless, in
order to maximize FBI mission relevance and to minimize the appearance of racial or ethnic
profiling, the criteria used to identify members of the group within the larger ethnic
community to which they belong must be as focused and as narrow as intelligence reporting
and other circumstances permit. If intelligence reporting is insufficiently exact so that it is
reasonable to believe that the criteria will include an unreasonable number of people who are
not involved, then it would be inappropriate to use the behaviors, standing alone, as the basis
for FBI activity.
4.3.3.2.5
(U) E XPLOITIVE E THNIC B EHAVIOR
(U) A related category of information that can be collected is behavioral and cultural
information about ethnic or racial communities that is reasonably likely to be exploited by
criminal or terrorist groups who hide within those communities in order to engage in illicit
activities undetected. For example, the existence of a cultural tradition of collecting funds
from members within the community to fund charitable causes in their homeland at a certain
time of the year (and how that is accomplished) would be relevant if intelligence reporting
revealed that, unknown to many donors, the charitable causes were fronts for terrorist
organizations or that terrorist supporters within the community intended to exploit the
unwitting donors for their own purposes.
15.6.1.1
(U) D OMAIN M ANAGEMENT
(U//FOUO) As part of Strategic Analysis Planning activities, the FBI may collect information
in order to improve or facilitate “domain awareness” and may engage in “domain
management.” “Domain management” is the systematic process by which the FBI develops
cross-programmatic domain awareness and leverages its knowledge to enhance its ability to:
(i) proactively identify threats, vulnerabilities, and intelligence gaps; (ii) discover new
opportunities for needed intelligence collection and prosecution; and (iii) set tripwires to
provide advance warning of national security and criminal threats. Tripwires are described in
DIOG Section 11. Effective domain management enables the FBI to identify significant
threats, detect vulnerabilities within its local and national domain, identify new sources and
threat indicators, and recognize new trends so that resources can be appropriately allocated at
the local level in accordance with national priorities and local threats.
(U//FOUO) The field office “domain” is the territory for which a field office exercises
responsibility, also known as the field office’s area-of-responsibility (AOR). Domain
awareness is the: (i) strategic understanding of national security and criminal threats and
vulnerabilities that exist in the domain; (ii) FBI’s positioning to collect against those threats
and vulnerabilities; and (iii) the ability to recognize intelligence gaps related to the domain.
15-3
UNCLASSIFIED – FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Version Dated:
March 3, 2016
UNCLASSIFIED – FOR OFFIC1AL USE ONLY
Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide
§15
(U//FOUO) Through analysis of previously collected information, supplemented as necessary
by properly authorized Type 4 Assessments, domain management should be-undertaken at the
local and national levels. All National Domain Assessments must be opened and coordinated
by the Directorate of Intelligence (DI). Examples of domain management activities include,
but are not limited to: collection and mapping of data such as I-94 data, census crime
statistics, investigative information, entities in the domain; analysis of trends; source
development; and placement of tripwires. See DIOG Section 11for further discussion of
tripwires. Further guidance regarding domain management and examples of intelligence
products are contained in the FBIHQ IPG.
(U//FOUO) All information collected during a Type 4 Domain Assessment must be
documented in the appropriate Assessment file (801H – 807H classifications), or if obtained
without opening an Assessment, in another 800-series classification file as directed in the DI
PG. Any time a Type 4 Domain Assessment begins to focus on specific individual(s),
group(s), or organization(s), whose activities may constitute a violation of federal criminal
law or a threat to the national security, or identifies persons or entities who may be actual or
potential targets of or vulnerable to federal criminal activities or national security threats, a
separate Assessment (Type 1 & 2 Assessment or a Type 3 Assessment) or Predicated
Investigation must be opened to collect information regarding the particular person, or the
threat or vulnerability.
(U//FOUO) FBIHQ DI provides specific guidance in its PG regarding, the opening,
coordination and purpose for a field office and national domain Type 4 Assessments.
15.6.1.1
(U) D OMAIN M ANAGEMENT
(U//FOUO) As part of Strategic Analysis Planning activities, the FBI may collect information
in order to improve or facilitate “domain awareness” and may engage in “domain
management.” “Domain management” is the systematic process by which the FBI develops
cross-programmatic domain awareness and leverages its knowledge to enhance its ability to:
(i) proactively identify threats, vulnerabilities, and intelligence gaps; (ii) discover new
opportunities for needed intelligence collection and prosecution; and (iii) set tripwires to
provide advance warning of national security and criminal threats. Tripwires are described in
DIOG Section 11. Effective domain management enables the FBI to identify significant
threats, detect vulnerabilities within its local and national domain, identify new sources and
threat indicators, and recognize new trends so that resources can be appropriately allocated at
the local level in accordance with national priorities and local threats.
(U//FOUO) The field office “domain” is the territory for which a field office exercises
responsibility, also known as the field office’s area-of-responsibility (AOR). Domain
awareness is the: (i) strategic understanding of national security and criminal threats and
vulnerabilities that exist in the domain; (ii) FBI’s positioning to collect against those threats
and vulnerabilities; and (iii) the ability to recognize intelligence gaps related to the domain.
15-3
UNCLASSIFIED – FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Version Dated:
March 3, 2016
UNCLASSIFIED – FOR OFFIC1AL USE ONLY
Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide
§15
(U//FOUO) Through analysis of previously collected information, supplemented as necessary
by properly authorized Type 4 Assessments, domain management should be-undertaken at the
local and national levels. All National Domain Assessments must be opened and coordinated
by the Directorate of Intelligence (DI). Examples of domain management activities include,
but are not limited to: collection and mapping of data such as I-94 data, census crime
statistics, investigative information, entities in the domain; analysis of trends; source
development; and placement of tripwires. See DIOG Section 11for further discussion of
tripwires. Further guidance regarding domain management and examples of intelligence
products are contained in the FBIHQ IPG.
(U//FOUO) All information collected during a Type 4 Domain Assessment must be
documented in the appropriate Assessment file (801H – 807H classifications), or if obtained
without opening an Assessment, in another 800-series classification file as directed in the DI
PG. Any time a Type 4 Domain Assessment begins to focus on specific individual(s),
group(s), or organization(s), whose activities may constitute a violation of federal criminal
law or a threat to the national security, or identifies persons or entities who may be actual or
potential targets of or vulnerable to federal criminal activities or national security threats, a
separate Assessment (Type 1 & 2 Assessment or a Type 3 Assessment) or Predicated
Investigation must be opened to collect information regarding the particular person, or the
threat or vulnerability.
(U//FOUO) FBIHQ DI provides specific guidance in its PG regarding, the opening,
coordination and purpose for a field office and national domain Type 4 Assessments.