Documents
KSM cable C06606424
Sep. 10, 2019
C06606424
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
TOT: 051J24Z
0517252
JUL 02
ALEC l81325
ALEC 181325
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
SUBJECT:
EYES ONLY - POST-ISOLATION
PHASE OF THE
ABU
ZUBAYDAH
INTERROGATIONS
REF:
NONE
TEXT:
1.
ACTION REQUIRED:
ON THE POST-ISOLATION
PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR HQS/.ALEC DETAILS
PHASE OF THE ABU ZUBAYDAHINTERROGATIONS FOR
THE RECORD.
(b)(1)
.
(b)( ) CIAAct
2.
oN 1 JULY 2002, HQS/ALEc HELD A MEETING To oiscuss THE_
3
n"cT-ISOLATION
PHASE OF THE .( (ABU ZUBAYDAH)) (AZ) INTERROGATIONS.
(b)(3) Nat SecA
..,.,~tPRIMARY PARTICIPANTS INCLUDED □CTC, CTC/COPS,
(b)(6)
rcTC/UB
. ANB½cc
□
~CT_C_/L_G_L_.-A~Z
I
INTERROGATION TEAM MEMBERS
IC SERE PSYCHOLOGIST
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(6)
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
(b)(6)
C06606424
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
TOT: 051J24Z
0517252
JUL 02
ALEC l81325
ALEC 181325
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
SUBJECT:
EYES ONLY - POST-ISOLATION
PHASE OF THE
ABU
ZUBAYDAH
INTERROGATIONS
REF:
NONE
TEXT:
1.
ACTION REQUIRED:
ON THE POST-ISOLATION
PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR HQS/.ALEC DETAILS
PHASE OF THE ABU ZUBAYDAHINTERROGATIONS FOR
THE RECORD.
(b)(1)
.
(b)( ) CIAAct
2.
oN 1 JULY 2002, HQS/ALEc HELD A MEETING To oiscuss THE_
3
n"cT-ISOLATION
PHASE OF THE .( (ABU ZUBAYDAH)) (AZ) INTERROGATIONS.
(b)(3) Nat SecA
..,.,~tPRIMARY PARTICIPANTS INCLUDED □CTC, CTC/COPS,
(b)(6)
rcTC/UB
. ANB½cc
□
~CT_C_/L_G_L_.-A~Z
I
INTERROGATION TEAM MEMBERS
IC SERE PSYCHOLOGIST
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(6)
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
(b)(6)
C06606424
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
lDJllJ
(b)(3) NatSecAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
(b)(6)
(b)(6)
FBI SA~--~AND[
PRESENT FOR THE MEETING.
.
FROMI
~D WERE
FBI OFFICERS
7RETURNED
IN ADDITION TO
(b)(6)
(b)(6)
PRESENT WERE
REPRESENTATIVES FROM OTS/OAD;
OF SECURITY WERE ALSO IN ATTENDANCE.
MEETING, ALL PARTrns
CRITICAL
OMS, AND THE OFFICE
AS IN THE PREVIOUS 4 JUNE
WERE IN AGREEMENT THAT AZ IS WITHHOLDING
INFORMATION, PARTIC.ULARLY ON DIRECT THREATS AGAINST U.S.
INTERESTS BOTH DOMESTICALLY AND OVERSEAS AND INFORMATION ABOUT
AL-QA' IDA PRESENCE IN THE U..S.
3.
CURRENT STATUS: AZ IS PRESENTLY IN THE FOURTEENTH DAY ~F
HIS ISOLATION PHASE.
INDIVIDUALS
DURING THIS PHASE,, HIS CONTACT WITH OUTSIDE
IS LIMITED To· A 'CIRCA 20 MINUTE 'DAILY ·MEDICAL
TREATMENT FOR HIS LEG.WOUND.
AZ· HAS NO CONTACT WITH ANY
INTERROGATION PERSONNEL AND HAS ACCESS TO WRITING MATERIAL AS HIS
SOLE METHOD OF COMMUNICATION.
HAS BEEN AN INCREASE IN AZ'S
CONDITION.
DURING THE ISOLATION' PHASE, THERE
COMPLAINTS ABOUT HIS MEDICAL
THE TEAM ASSESS THAT THIS IS PROBABLY A TECHNIQUE .TO
TEST THE RESPONSIVENESS OF HIS MEDICAL CARE AND/OR INITIATE
LEVEL OF HUMANCONTACT.
SOME
FOR THE MOST PART, AZ APPEARS QUITE BORED
AND SHOWS NO SIGNS OF SEVERE EMOTIONAL DISTRESS.
I
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) NatSecAct
THROUGHOUTHIS ISOLATION,
AZ HAS MADE NO/NO ATTEMPT AT PROVIDING
INFORMATION ON DIRECT THREATS AGAINST THE UNIT.ED STATES.
4.
POST-ISOLATION
PHASE: THE 1 JULY MEETING FOCUSED·
PRIMARILY ON THE NEXT PHASE OF THE AZ INTERROGATIONS.
IT WAS
CONCLUDED THIS PHASE WOULDBE THE LAST HARD PUSH IN THE
INTERROGATIONS OF AZ AND CONCENTRATE ON TWO·MAJOR ISSUES:
1)
PENDING TERRORIST ATTACKS PLANNED AGAINST THE UNITED .STATES·OR.OUR
INTERESTS OVERSEAS, AND 2)
THE TERRORIST SUPPORT N.ETWORKIN
AMERICA AND SAUDI ARABIA.
THE POST-ISOLATION
PHASE WILL LAST
APPROXIMATELY FOUR WEEKS, AFTER WHICH THE TEAM WILL RETURN TO
IMPLEMENT THE NEXT PHASE.
AZ'S
AS THIS
IS A EXTREMELY FLUID SITUATION,
BEHAVIOR DURING THE POST-ISOLATION
PHASE MAY REQUIRE
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE GENERAL BLUEPRINT OUTLINED ABOVE AND .BELOW.
ADDITION,
A FOLLOW-ON MEETING WILL BE HELD ON~Y
THE sPEcIFics
5.
oF BELow GENERAL sTRATEGY.
POST-ISOLATION
POST-ISOLATION
OUTSIDE AZ'S
IN
TO OUTLINE
(b)(3) NatSecAct
STRATEGY: IN APPROACHING THE
PHASE, IT WAS DECIDED THAT WK MUS.T ACT IN A WAY
EXPECTATIONS AND FOLLOW THROUGH ON OUR THREATS.
UNTIL THIS POINT IN THE INTERROGATIONS, WE HAVE MADE SEVERAL
(b)(3) NatSecAct
THREATS TO AZ WHILE IMPLEMENTING THE "BAD GQY" ROL.E PLAYED BY
c=]WHILE
THE FIRST OF THESE THREATS FACILITATED THE 19 MAY
"REVELATION,"
REPERCUSSIONS,
~-~
EACH SUBSEQUENT EPISODE LACKED THE PROMISED
A FACT THAT WAS NOT LOST ON AZ.
THAT HIS TREATMENT HAS NOT CHANGED --
AZ HAS REALIZED
A REALIZATION THAT HE HAS
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
C06606424
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
lDJllJ
(b)(3) NatSecAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
(b)(6)
(b)(6)
FBI SA~--~AND[
PRESENT FOR THE MEETING.
.
FROMI
~D WERE
FBI OFFICERS
7RETURNED
IN ADDITION TO
(b)(6)
(b)(6)
PRESENT WERE
REPRESENTATIVES FROM OTS/OAD;
OF SECURITY WERE ALSO IN ATTENDANCE.
MEETING, ALL PARTrns
CRITICAL
OMS, AND THE OFFICE
AS IN THE PREVIOUS 4 JUNE
WERE IN AGREEMENT THAT AZ IS WITHHOLDING
INFORMATION, PARTIC.ULARLY ON DIRECT THREATS AGAINST U.S.
INTERESTS BOTH DOMESTICALLY AND OVERSEAS AND INFORMATION ABOUT
AL-QA' IDA PRESENCE IN THE U..S.
3.
CURRENT STATUS: AZ IS PRESENTLY IN THE FOURTEENTH DAY ~F
HIS ISOLATION PHASE.
INDIVIDUALS
DURING THIS PHASE,, HIS CONTACT WITH OUTSIDE
IS LIMITED To· A 'CIRCA 20 MINUTE 'DAILY ·MEDICAL
TREATMENT FOR HIS LEG.WOUND.
AZ· HAS NO CONTACT WITH ANY
INTERROGATION PERSONNEL AND HAS ACCESS TO WRITING MATERIAL AS HIS
SOLE METHOD OF COMMUNICATION.
HAS BEEN AN INCREASE IN AZ'S
CONDITION.
DURING THE ISOLATION' PHASE, THERE
COMPLAINTS ABOUT HIS MEDICAL
THE TEAM ASSESS THAT THIS IS PROBABLY A TECHNIQUE .TO
TEST THE RESPONSIVENESS OF HIS MEDICAL CARE AND/OR INITIATE
LEVEL OF HUMANCONTACT.
SOME
FOR THE MOST PART, AZ APPEARS QUITE BORED
AND SHOWS NO SIGNS OF SEVERE EMOTIONAL DISTRESS.
I
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) NatSecAct
THROUGHOUTHIS ISOLATION,
AZ HAS MADE NO/NO ATTEMPT AT PROVIDING
INFORMATION ON DIRECT THREATS AGAINST THE UNIT.ED STATES.
4.
POST-ISOLATION
PHASE: THE 1 JULY MEETING FOCUSED·
PRIMARILY ON THE NEXT PHASE OF THE AZ INTERROGATIONS.
IT WAS
CONCLUDED THIS PHASE WOULDBE THE LAST HARD PUSH IN THE
INTERROGATIONS OF AZ AND CONCENTRATE ON TWO·MAJOR ISSUES:
1)
PENDING TERRORIST ATTACKS PLANNED AGAINST THE UNITED .STATES·OR.OUR
INTERESTS OVERSEAS, AND 2)
THE TERRORIST SUPPORT N.ETWORKIN
AMERICA AND SAUDI ARABIA.
THE POST-ISOLATION
PHASE WILL LAST
APPROXIMATELY FOUR WEEKS, AFTER WHICH THE TEAM WILL RETURN TO
IMPLEMENT THE NEXT PHASE.
AZ'S
AS THIS
IS A EXTREMELY FLUID SITUATION,
BEHAVIOR DURING THE POST-ISOLATION
PHASE MAY REQUIRE
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE GENERAL BLUEPRINT OUTLINED ABOVE AND .BELOW.
ADDITION,
A FOLLOW-ON MEETING WILL BE HELD ON~Y
THE sPEcIFics
5.
oF BELow GENERAL sTRATEGY.
POST-ISOLATION
POST-ISOLATION
OUTSIDE AZ'S
IN
TO OUTLINE
(b)(3) NatSecAct
STRATEGY: IN APPROACHING THE
PHASE, IT WAS DECIDED THAT WK MUS.T ACT IN A WAY
EXPECTATIONS AND FOLLOW THROUGH ON OUR THREATS.
UNTIL THIS POINT IN THE INTERROGATIONS, WE HAVE MADE SEVERAL
(b)(3) NatSecAct
THREATS TO AZ WHILE IMPLEMENTING THE "BAD GQY" ROL.E PLAYED BY
c=]WHILE
THE FIRST OF THESE THREATS FACILITATED THE 19 MAY
"REVELATION,"
REPERCUSSIONS,
~-~
EACH SUBSEQUENT EPISODE LACKED THE PROMISED
A FACT THAT WAS NOT LOST ON AZ.
THAT HIS TREATMENT HAS NOT CHANGED --
AZ HAS REALIZED
A REALIZATION THAT HE HAS
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
C06606424
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
PERCEIVED AS A VICTORY.
AZ HAS ALSO SCORED A VICTORY :rn HIS MIND
BY GETTING OUR MEDICAL PERSONNEL TO RESPOND TO HIS CONCERNS,
PARTICULARLY ABQUT BLOOD IN HIS SEMEN:
AZ'S
LONG-TERM OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS
BOLSTER
6.
POST-ISOLATI'ON
OF THE INTERROGATIONS.
:STRATEGY (CONT'.D):
DYNAMICS OF THE INTERROGATIONS,
(b)(3) NatSecActAND
=7
I
THESE VICTORIES
RESOLVE AND RESISTANCE STRATEGY, THUS DECREASING THE
FIRST
IN ORDER TO CHANGE THE
I.T WAS TENTATIVELY DECIDED TO
THE ROLE OF THE "BAD GUY" BEYOND THAT ALREADY PLAYED BY
THIS NEW "BAD GUY" WILL ACT AS A MORE COMBATIVE BE THE
INDIVIDUAL TO CONFRONT AZ AFTER HIS PERIOD OF ISOLATION,
WHICH MAY END WITH TIME SPENT IN THE CONFINEMENT BOX.
RECOMMENDATIONOFII
OTS/OAD IS
THE SERVICES OF ~O
PER THE
(b)(3) NatSecAct
IN THE PROCESS OF ACQUIRING
.IS 'WELL-VERSED IN CONDUCTING SERE-LIKE
HOSTILE INTERROGATIONS.
THE "BAD GUY" WILL CONVI·NCE Az· THAT HIS
SITUATION HAS_DRASTICALLY CHANGED, AND THAT HIS ISOLATION AND. TIME
(b )( 1)
IN
(b)(3) NatSecAct
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(6)
THE BOX WERE ONLY THE BEGINNING OF THIS CHANGE.
'---------------------------------~
'------------~
SERIES
HE POST-ISClLATION STRATEGY WILL IMPLEMENT A
OF INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES AND TOOLS, ALL OF WHICH WILL
WITHIN OUR LEGAL GUIDELINES.
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(6)
7.
[J:TC/LGL
HAS EMPHASIZED THAT WE SHOULD NOT/NOT RULE OUT
ANY METHOD OF INTERROGATION WHATSOEVER, SO LONG AS THE
INTERROGATION TEAM BELIEVES
IT WILL BE EFF.ECTIVE,
OF.COURSE,
HQS
WILL NEED TO DOCUMENT IN ADVANCE THE LEGAL ANALYSIS FOR SUCH
METHODS, TO ENSURE. THAT OUR OFFICERS ARE PROTECTED; ALONG THESE
LINES,
IF/IF
REQ.(JIRED BY A SPEC!"FIC .PROPOSAL, WE WILL ASK THE DCI
TO SEEK A FORMAL DECLINATION OF ·.PROSECUTION FROM THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL FOR ANY SPECIFIC
EFFECTIVE
METHODS WHICH THE TEAM·BELIEVES
BUT WHICH MIGHT NOT OTHERWISE BE PERMISSIBL.E.
RULE OUT NOTHING.WHATSOEVER THAT YOUBELIEVE
OFFICERS
REMAIN AVAILABI:.E 24/7
IN SHORT,
MAY BE -EFFECTIVE;
RATHER, COME ON BACK AND WE WH,L GET YOU THE APPROVALS.
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(6)
WOULD BE
(b)(3) CIAAct
CTC/I:.GL
TO ENSURE IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE AND
DOCUMENTATION ON ANY PROPOSALS, AND THE OFFI.CE AN[1
CONTACT NUMBERS FoRc::}Tc/LGL
f\RE P~Ro_v_I_D_E_D~I
___
I
D (
(b)(3) NatSecAct
____,
IT MAY BE OBSERVED THAT THE APPLICABLE u. s. ·LAW'WITH RESPECT
TO INTERROGATION METHODS IS. MORE PERMISSIVE THAN,. SAY, .. THE
COMPARABLE EUROPEAN OR ISRAELI
THAT EVEN THE ISRAELIS
8.
LAW: WE LAWFULLY MAY EMPLOY METHODS
MAY NOT-)'.
HQS/ALEC WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RESULTS.· FOLLOWING THE 8
JULY HQS MEETING.
REGARDS.
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(6)
C06606424
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
PERCEIVED AS A VICTORY.
AZ HAS ALSO SCORED A VICTORY :rn HIS MIND
BY GETTING OUR MEDICAL PERSONNEL TO RESPOND TO HIS CONCERNS,
PARTICULARLY ABQUT BLOOD IN HIS SEMEN:
AZ'S
LONG-TERM OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS
BOLSTER
6.
POST-ISOLATI'ON
OF THE INTERROGATIONS.
:STRATEGY (CONT'.D):
DYNAMICS OF THE INTERROGATIONS,
(b)(3) NatSecActAND
=7
I
THESE VICTORIES
RESOLVE AND RESISTANCE STRATEGY, THUS DECREASING THE
FIRST
IN ORDER TO CHANGE THE
I.T WAS TENTATIVELY DECIDED TO
THE ROLE OF THE "BAD GUY" BEYOND THAT ALREADY PLAYED BY
THIS NEW "BAD GUY" WILL ACT AS A MORE COMBATIVE BE THE
INDIVIDUAL TO CONFRONT AZ AFTER HIS PERIOD OF ISOLATION,
WHICH MAY END WITH TIME SPENT IN THE CONFINEMENT BOX.
RECOMMENDATIONOFII
OTS/OAD IS
THE SERVICES OF ~O
PER THE
(b)(3) NatSecAct
IN THE PROCESS OF ACQUIRING
.IS 'WELL-VERSED IN CONDUCTING SERE-LIKE
HOSTILE INTERROGATIONS.
THE "BAD GUY" WILL CONVI·NCE Az· THAT HIS
SITUATION HAS_DRASTICALLY CHANGED, AND THAT HIS ISOLATION AND. TIME
(b )( 1)
IN
(b)(3) NatSecAct
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(6)
THE BOX WERE ONLY THE BEGINNING OF THIS CHANGE.
'---------------------------------~
'------------~
SERIES
HE POST-ISClLATION STRATEGY WILL IMPLEMENT A
OF INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES AND TOOLS, ALL OF WHICH WILL
WITHIN OUR LEGAL GUIDELINES.
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(6)
7.
[J:TC/LGL
HAS EMPHASIZED THAT WE SHOULD NOT/NOT RULE OUT
ANY METHOD OF INTERROGATION WHATSOEVER, SO LONG AS THE
INTERROGATION TEAM BELIEVES
IT WILL BE EFF.ECTIVE,
OF.COURSE,
HQS
WILL NEED TO DOCUMENT IN ADVANCE THE LEGAL ANALYSIS FOR SUCH
METHODS, TO ENSURE. THAT OUR OFFICERS ARE PROTECTED; ALONG THESE
LINES,
IF/IF
REQ.(JIRED BY A SPEC!"FIC .PROPOSAL, WE WILL ASK THE DCI
TO SEEK A FORMAL DECLINATION OF ·.PROSECUTION FROM THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL FOR ANY SPECIFIC
EFFECTIVE
METHODS WHICH THE TEAM·BELIEVES
BUT WHICH MIGHT NOT OTHERWISE BE PERMISSIBL.E.
RULE OUT NOTHING.WHATSOEVER THAT YOUBELIEVE
OFFICERS
REMAIN AVAILABI:.E 24/7
IN SHORT,
MAY BE -EFFECTIVE;
RATHER, COME ON BACK AND WE WH,L GET YOU THE APPROVALS.
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(6)
WOULD BE
(b)(3) CIAAct
CTC/I:.GL
TO ENSURE IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE AND
DOCUMENTATION ON ANY PROPOSALS, AND THE OFFI.CE AN[1
CONTACT NUMBERS FoRc::}Tc/LGL
f\RE P~Ro_v_I_D_E_D~I
___
I
D (
(b)(3) NatSecAct
____,
IT MAY BE OBSERVED THAT THE APPLICABLE u. s. ·LAW'WITH RESPECT
TO INTERROGATION METHODS IS. MORE PERMISSIVE THAN,. SAY, .. THE
COMPARABLE EUROPEAN OR ISRAELI
THAT EVEN THE ISRAELIS
8.
LAW: WE LAWFULLY MAY EMPLOY METHODS
MAY NOT-)'.
HQS/ALEC WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RESULTS.· FOLLOWING THE 8
JULY HQS MEETING.
REGARDS.
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(6)
C06606424
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
(b)(6)
END OF MESSAGE
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
C06606424
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424
(b )( 1)
(b)(3) CIAAct
(b)(3) NatSecAct
(b)(6)
END OF MESSAGE
Approved for Release: 2017/11/29 C06606424