Skip to main content

Single Mom Thwarts the New Jersey Prosecutor Who Went Easy on Ray Rice

Shaneen Allen, the Pennsylvania woman arrested last year for bringing her legally licensed gun across state lines into New Jersey, avoided a possible three-and-a-half-year jail sentence after New Jersey’s attorney general effectively overruled a decision made by a county prosecutor, paving the way for Allen to enter a pretrial intervention program. Allen, a 28-year-old mother of two, […]

Shaneen Allen

Shaneen Allen, the Pennsylvania woman arrested last year for bringing her legally licensed gun across state lines into New Jersey, avoided a possible three-and-a-half-year jail sentence after New Jersey’s attorney general effectively overruled a decision made by a county prosecutor, paving the way for Allen to enter a pretrial intervention program.

Allen, a 28-year-old mother of two, had purchased a gun to protect her family in the wake of two robberies. She did not realize, before getting pulled over for a traffic violation, that the weapon’s Pennsylvania permit was not valid in New Jersey. After telling the officer who pulled her over about the weapon, she spent 40 days in jail and faced a lengthy mandatory prison sentence. Atlantic County Prosecutor Jim McClain denied her entry into the state’s pretrial intervention program, even though McClain had allowed NFL player Ray Rice into that same program when he faced charges of violently assaulting his girlfriend.

It should have never reached this point in the first place.

But Wednesday afternoon, New Jersey acting attorney general John Hoffman delivered a letter to county prosecutors in his state, clarifying that state weapons laws should allow defendants like Allen access to those intervention programs. McClain subsequently said Allen would be admitted into the pretrial intervention program.

Hoffman’s letter, an analysis of New Jersey’s Graves Act, which imposes mandatory sentences on certain gun crimes, raises questions about the tough line McClain took with Allen. In addition to denying Allen’s application for pretrial diversion, McClain asked her to swallow a three and a half year prison sentence as part of a plea deal. But after canvassing the state’s 21 county prosecutors, Hoffman found that out-of-state residents found to be carrying weapons they can legally posses in their home state don’t generally go to jail and have been admitted to pretrial intervention programs.

“The survey showed that absent some case-specific aggravating circumstances, typically a defendant who commits such inadvertent offense is not sentenced to State Prison,” Hoffman wrote. “The survey also showed that some defendants are admitted to PTI, depending on the case-specific circumstances.”

“In most of these cases,” Hoffman wrote separately, “imprisonment is neither necessary nor appropriate to serve the interests of justice and protect public safety.”

The Graves Act says that prosecutors should consider the specifics of a case and not categorically deny defendants entry into pretrial diversion just because they are accused of a weapons-related offense with a minimum mandatory sentence.

In the wake of Hoffman’s letter, McClain’s office not only reversed its decision on Allen but also pledged to review other cases in which it denied pretrial intervention requests.

Thankfully a semblance of common sense arrived in time for Allen to avoid years of imprisonment and further separation from her children. But it should have never reached this point in the first place. Even one minute in prison was too much for Allen, let alone being locked up for more than five weeks before being released only on bail. And until major reform of prosecutorial behavior in America takes place, more alarming and irresponsible decisions that affect innocent, powerless people will occur.

Photo: Ben Fogletto/The Press of Atlantic City/AP

IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.

What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. 

This is not hyperbole.

Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.

Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” 

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.

We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.

In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.

That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?

Donate

Latest Stories

Join The Conversation