The U.S. military has paid nearly $6 million to civilians killed and injured in combat operations over almost 10 years of war in Afghanistan, according to the latest numbers released by the Army.
These sums, known as condolence payments, are among the ways the U.S. military compensates civilians for deaths, injuries or property damages that occur during fighting.
The new numbers come from spreadsheets that the U.S. Army Central—the Army branch of U.S. Central Command—posted recently to its Freedom of Information Act website. The Intercept had requested all of this data but had received it only for fiscal years 2011 through 2013—years we included in our analysis and visualization of compensation for civilian casualties published last week. The military’s figures cover fiscal years 2006 through 2014, and total $5,927,200.
In conflicts since the Korean War, the U.S. has paid out these token amounts in situations where commanders decide it is culturally appropriate. The payments are not intended to admit wrongdoing or actually assess the value of lost life or property. Condolence payments began in Afghanistan in 2005, but as The Intercept has reported, the system is far from perfect, marred by inconsistency and poor record keeping.
Like those we reported on last week, these records offer only a bare minimum of information. Most do not have a date, only the province is given by way of location, and the level of detail in the incident synopsis varies widely. Some entries are simply labeled “condolence payment.” A few include names of the victims, and are as specific as “Mr A. Khan’s truck, cow and a cord of wood was destroyed during combat activities on 27 Sept 04,” or “local national’s hand injured and lost 3 fingers.”
The most money was spent in fiscal year 2011, when the military logged 557 payments for a total of $1.3 million, followed by $1.29 million in 2010. For the first two years the program was in existence, however, there are only a few dozen recorded payments. Between October 2013 and September 2014, the most recent data, the U.S. committed to pay more than $174,200 in 89 payments.
The Pentagon has previously said that the general ceiling for condolence payments in Afghanistan is $5000. These records show greater amounts were regularly paid out — but those sometimes reflect a lump sum for multiple deaths or injuries. In fiscal year 2010, for example, there was one payment of $156,720 for the family members of 22 people who were killed and 23 who were wounded.
The earlier years include a few payments for repairs for battle damage. One payment of $160,000 was to replace “a dozen commercial vehicles due to collateral damage.”
In our analysis, we have not separated out totals for deaths, injuries and property damage, because many of the records do not specify what they are for.
In Afghanistan, these payments come from a special congressionally funded pot of spending money known as the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program. (It is also used for reconstruction and other “goodwill” projects.) The military distinguishes between condolence payments and “solatia,” which, while functionally the same, come out of a unit’s operating budget. So these condolence payment records are still only a partial accounting of how much the U.S. has paid to civilians.
You can download the year-by-year data from the Army Central’s FOIA website.
Photo: Aref Karimi/AFP/Getty
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
Voices
We Need to Kick Prediction Market Betting Out of Journalism While We Still Can
Treating journalism like a casino will harm reporting — and erode democracy.
The War on Immigrants
Who Decided to Indict Kilmar Abrego Garcia Over a Years-Old Traffic Stop?
A DOJ prosecutor insists he charged Abrego based strictly on evidence of human smuggling. A federal judge seems skeptical.
Voices
How Trump’s America Produces Normie Assassins
The only extremism would-be assassins like suspect Cole Tomas Allen share is an extreme response to Trump’s deranging politics.