(This post is from our new blog: Unofficial Sources.)
This is what happens when there is no accountability.
President Obama has chosen to operate his drone war in such unprecedented, absurd and arguably illegal secrecy that even in a rare burst of compelled transparency yesterday, neither he nor his press secretary could actually bring themselves to say the word “drone.”
Over and over again, Obama called the drone strike that killed two al Qaeda hostages a “counterterrorism operation.”
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest at the press briefing:
Q: How will this incident affect specifically the U.S. policy, government policy on usage of drones?
MR. EARNEST: Well, Jeff, there are certain aspects of this specific operation that I’m not going to be able to discuss, including how this specific operation was carried out …
Q: Can you address the issue of drones, though, in any way? I take it you don’t want to confirm that that’s what used in this particular strike.
MR. EARNEST: I’m not in the position to talk specifically about how the operation was carried out.
Q: Can you talk, though, about a future review of drone strategy more generally?
MR. EARNEST: What I can say is that these counterterrorism operations that are critical to the national security of the United States and critical to the safety of the American people continue …
If they cannot even say the word, how can they even begin to tell the truth?
Accountability serves a primary and essential purpose in a democracy. Not to embarrass people who make bad decisions. Not to expose incompetence. (Although those are both common consequences.) It’s so that we don’t make bad decisions in the first place.
When you know your decisions are going to be examined, you make better ones. When your previous bad decisions are exposed, dissected and diagnosed, you make better ones.
When you know the world is looking over your shoulder, you think things through more.
On the third day of his presidency, Obama launched his very first drone strike, in Pakistan, which claimed not a terrorist, but a prominent pro-government tribal elder and four members of his family (including two children).
Theoretically, he imposed new rules after that, calling for higher levels of certainty and requiring his own sign-off. But the January drone strike that killed two al Qaeda hostages evidently did not require or get his approval, and was aimed at a suspicious building whose occupants were not actually known.
Imagine if we’d known about that first strike soon after, rather than learning about it deep inside a book published in 2012?
Maybe none of this would have happened.
Instead, Obama and the political operatives running the White House continue to make life-or-death decisions in a bubble, surrounded by overconfident and overly bellicose men who are so in denial about the fact that they routinely kill civilians that they have created their own reality in which everyone who dies deserved it, and every death helps.
It’s simply unacceptable. At the risk of stressing the obvious:
1) The drone program should no longer be a secret.
2) The rules for engagement should be made public, so there can be a public discussion about them, and how they should be changed.
3) Every bit of information the government has about every past drone strike should be made public, and subject to scrutiny.
The use of drones and cyberattacks mean you can have secret wars now. But secret wars and democracy don’t go together. One has to go.
___________
Articles worth reading if you haven’t already:
- “Drone Strikes Reveal Uncomfortable Truth: U.S. Is Often Unsure About Who Will Die” (The New York Times)
- “A Drone Program That Has Killed Hundreds Of Civilians Finally Killed Some That The White House Regrets” (Huffington Post)
- “Hostages’ deaths raise wider questions about drone strikes’ civilian toll” (The Washington Post)
- “Warren Weinstein and the Long Drone War” (The New Yorker)
- “The United States Needs a Drone Board” (Defense One)
Also on The Intercept:
- When Will Obama Apologize for all the Other Innocent Victims of Drone Strikes?
- The Key War on Terror Propaganda Tool: Only Western Victims Are Acknowledged
- Secret Details of Drone Strike Revealed As Unprecedented Case Goes to German Court
- Germany is the Tell-Tale Heart of America’s Drone War
Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
The War on Immigrants
Trump Bulldozed a 1,000-Year-Old Archeological Site to Make Room for a Second Border Wall
DHS was in talks with the wildlife refuge that hosts the ancient site to make sure it was protected, a local archeologist said.
Ron Wyden Is Pissing Off the NSA’s Biggest Backers. Tom Cotton Warns There Will Be “Consequences.”
Debate over a secret court opinion involving the Trump administration’s use of data collected by the NSA turned personal.
Midterms 2026
Democratic Leaders Wanted to Control the Maine Senate Race. Their Pick Just Dropped Out.
Janet Mills dropped out of the Senate race against Graham Platner, despite the establishment’s longtime support for the Maine governor.