Sister Helen Prejean, the Roman Catholic nun whose relationship with death row prisoners was dramatized in the 1993 film Dead Man Walking, testified today as the final defense witness at the trial of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. Her testimony, while brief, offered the first answer to one of the enduring questions about Dzhokhar’s role in the crime: Does he feel remorse?
“No one deserves to suffer like they did,” Tsarnaev told Prejean, according to her testimony, on one of several visits she has made with him over the past several months. “He lowered his eyes … his voice, it had pain in it,” Prejean said, describing Tsarnaev’s feelings of guilt over the harm he had done to the marathon bombing victims. “He said it emphatically … I had every reason to believe he was sincere.”
Since his arrest, Tsarnaev has been held under highly restrictive “special administrative measures” that have limited his communication with the outside world. In recent years, federal authorities have imposed such restrictions in high-profile terrorism cases in an attempt to prevent defendants from issuing statements to the public. In Tsarnaev’s case, the special administrative measures and his decision not to testify in his own defense — which is exceedingly common in capital cases — have combined to leave his feelings about his crime a mystery.
As a clergywoman, Prejean was permitted to meet with Tsarnaev despite the special restrictions imposed on him. Her resulting testimony about Tsarnaev’s remorse contradicted widespread public speculation that Tsarnaev has been unrepentant about the bombing he conducted with his deceased older brother. His posture in court seemed to buttress the testimony: Tsarnaev looked at Prejean throughout her testimony, and she, in turn, paused to smile at him at certain moments. When she described his feelings of remorse and shame, Tsarnaev bowed his head toward the table in front of him.
Following Prejean’s testimony, defense counsel rested their case in the sentencing portion of the trial. Having already been found guilty on 30 counts related to the 2013 marathon bombing, Tsarnaev’s defense team is now fighting only to spare him the death penalty for his role in the attack. Arguing that he will face “unrelenting punishment” while serving a life sentence at the ADX Supermax facility in Florence, Colorado, his lawyers have sought to describe execution as an inappropriately harsh sentence given his age and degree of involvement in the plot relative to his deceased older brother, Tamerlan. Jurors are expected to begin their deliberations on his sentence next week.
The strategy of Tsarnaev’s lawyers throughout the sentencing phase has been to portray Tamerlan as the primary actor in the bombing. At the same time, the defense team has sought to humanize their client through the testimony of those who knew him personally and can give insight into his thoughts and character.
Last week, in the midst of her testimony at the trial, Tsarnaev’s former college friend, Alexa Guevara, 21, broke down and wept on the stand while recalling her memories of Tsarnaev. Fighting to compose herself, she told the court she was crying because, “I really miss the person that I knew. He was a good friend.” Describing how, after seeing her sketchbook one day, Tsarnaev had encouraged her to apply for art school, Guevara said, “He told me I have talent, and I shouldn’t let it go to waste. He made me feel like somebody believed in me.”
The testimony of Guevara and of other friends, relatives and teachers who knew Tsarnaev has helped paint a more complex portrait of the defendant than the callous, middle-finger waving, aspiring jihadist the press has commonly depicted. Indeed, in spite of the bombing, many of the people whose lives actually intersected with Tsarnaev’s appear to have loved him.
In a Facebook posting after her testimony last week on behalf of Tsarnaev, his former middle school teacher, Becki Norris, wrote, “I’ve discovered the painful truth that when you care deeply for someone, that doesn’t stop even if they do unfathomably horrible things.” Speaking of her enduring affection for Tsarnaev, whom she had known since childhood, she said, “Yes, he did the unforgivable. And yes, I still love him. And — this one is hard to fathom, I know — he still needs love.”
A former coach on Tsarnaev’s high school wrestling team dissociated the boy he knew from the one now on trial for his life in the bombing case, testifying last week that he was simply not “the same Dzhokhar that I knew.”
In her testimony today, Prejean described Tsarnaev as respectful and apparently sincere in his interactions with her. “The first time I met him, I thought, oh my God, he’s so young,” Prejean said. “We talked about his crimes. I thought he was genuinely sorry for what he did.” Adding that she had not been paid “one dime” for her testimony, Prejean testified, “I would not tell the jury Dzhokhar was remorseful if I didn’t really believe it.”
Image: Jane Flavell Collins/AP
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
Voices
Big Finance Might Be Dooming the SPLC — Even Before Its Day in Court
Fidelity, Charles Schwab, and Vanguard are tamping down on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s donations as the government’s de facto censors.
Voices
Tennessee GOP Moves to Decimate Black Voting Power After Supreme Court’s Blessing of Jim Crow
With the Supreme Court blessing racial gerrymandering, Tennessee’s GOP rushed to eliminate the state’s only majority-Black congressional district.
Amid Hantavirus Panic, the Ivermectin Super Fans Are Back
Those who cheered ivermectin as a Covid-19 treatment are now making unsubstantiated claims about its use against hantavirus.